**POLL** More Night Games at Wirgley?
I can't find the stat (Lord knows if I wasn't looking for it I'd find it easily) but as I recall the Cubs have a better overall record in night games then in day games.
Would you like to see the Cubs play more night games?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I voted no
by Kzoo Cubs Fan on Mar 12, 2008 11:39 AM CDT reply actions
I wish
me too!
by drewishdrewid on Mar 12, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Dont get me wrong
I guess I am a little fortunate becauase I live right by the Sheridan stop and work at Evanston Hospital so getting from work to the game is very easy because of the L. Thankfully as well, my boss grants 1/2 vacation days.
You obviously
I can walk to the game though.
Its also a nightmare getting to a game at 120 when you have a 9-5. ACtually ITS IMPOSSIBLE
This is why...
Even that is a change. In the 1970's most teams started their home night games at 7:35 or even 8:05. When I first started working in the TV biz most White Sox home night games started at 8:05. The joke was that there was a rule that those games couldn't end until the 10 pm news was over.
I know
Wont happen----Im OK with day games, gives me something to listen to at work
1:20 starts
Maybe I'm too much the traditionalist, but I love the 1:20 start. I wouldstill prefer to take an afternoon off and go to the ballpark than I would go to a night game. There's just something really cool about afternoon games.
Chicago businesses should hope so
Counterbalance
As a person who lives about 2 miles from the ballpark, I can tell you that I would love it if the Cubs were banned from ever playing a weeknight Night game. I can't even imagine what its like for someone that lives in the above described "block".
Of course, the best thing would be to build a new Park downtown where the Transportation System and other infrastructure is in place to support a park. And the best place is smack dab in the middle of Grant Park -- thereby ending that other blight on the City - Taste of Chicago.
by frustratedfan on Mar 12, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
you don't like the taste?
by mike @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Mar 12, 2008 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't Like the Taste?
by frustratedfan on Mar 12, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Not sure where I read this but...
That said, I prefer day games. Nothing beats skipping work to goto Wrigley. :)
The fans vote with their attendance....
Selfishly, I look forward to day games during the week so I don't have to spend the night in Chicago. Games are expensive enough as it is. I can make the 5 hour trip, watch a noon game and go back to Des Moines that night.
As far as a small boost to the Chicago economy, it would make sense to add a dozen more night games or so, so that out of towners have to stay the night.
I voted no
You should have had a third choice...
I'm as traditional as anyone and love day baseball. But it really doesn't matter to me.
my thoughts exactly
Night games
night games........
by bolson1076 on Mar 12, 2008 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
This is really one decision that I think...
Day games
I actually wouldn't mind if they added a handful of night games from what they have now, but this is a slippery slope. I'd hate to get to the point where they play 65 to 70 a year, because Wrigley is at its most beautiful during the day.
Mayor Daley and Tom Tunney are strongly aligned
Well,...
by Damen Jackson on Mar 12, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I think more is better.
We can debate this every day of the world and twice on Sunday, but I still say that more day games in the hot summer months is a disadvantage. I'm not saying it's THE reason the Cubs haven't won a World Series, because it's not. I'm saying it's a disadvantage, when most other teams are playing in cooler temperatures, coming off road trips and having the entire day to rest, etc. It's all about the body clock, and working in the hotel business where my schedule is all over the place, I can relate. Anything that is to the Cubs' advantage, meaning the players, I'm all for. I think maybe 40 night games, or about half, would be a good thing for the team, and not too much to ask from the city. And I think Wrigley Field is equally beautiful at night as it is during the day.
Change the question slightly...
Wins versus more game at night
All Night Games and three World Series Wins in a row
Current Night Games and a World Series Win or
All Day Games and another 100 years of frustration
I would reluctantly take all Day Games and another 100 years of frustration.
by frustratedfan on Mar 12, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Gimme a break
that's ridiculous
you may have been joking, in which case, LOL
I voted yes because
I prefer the asthetic of day games because that's what I grew up with, and it's easier to enjoy a game on a nice summer day, have dinner at Lou Malnotti's and still get home at a decent hour.
I also think it should be an advantage to play day games for two reasons -- on days when the Cubs win at home (and are in the race), the competition sees that before they even take the field. Plus, as Lee alluded to yesterday, the home team should be used to it.
Having said that, if the team still sees it otherwise, well, maybe there is something to it.
by Shanghai Badger on Mar 12, 2008 2:26 PM CDT reply actions
Well who really cares about this topic
by LilLPLancer23 on Mar 12, 2008 3:11 PM CDT reply actions

by 


















