New Lineup created by Lou
The lineup goes as:
Theriot SS
Soriano LF
Lee 1b
Ramirez 3b
Fukudome RF
then I think the rest will be:
DeRosa 2b
Soto C
Pie CF
I really do not understand what Lou is trying to accomplish here by putting Soriano 2b. Theriot really isn't that great of a leadoff hitter. This is going to be used on Friday. I don't really feel like bringing him up, but are they using this to see out the lineup would be if Brian Roberts was leading off?
Source: http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2008/03/soriano-to-bat.html
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation, Bleed Cubbie Blue, or Al Yellon, editor-in-chief. FanPost opinions are, however, valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
88
comments
Comments
Don't worry about that line-up
This is what Piniella does, he plays around with stuff until he finds something he likes. For all we know It could just last a game or two, so nobody should really pay much attention to it until we see it during the regular season alot. Personally I think Soriano should either bat 1st(get the most productive Soriano), or 5th so he can drive in runs with his power. I think most likely he will be in one of those spots come opening day. Alot probably depends on his legs being healthy, if we get Roberts or Theriot(375 this spring) keeps hitting well in the regular season.
by cubsfan25 on Mar 12, 2008 4:29 PM CDT 0 recs
It wont last

by Hammer on Mar 12, 2008 4:32 PM CDT 0 recs
No you don't
by zambranofan on
Mar 12, 2008 4:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
LOL
by jazzypete on
Mar 12, 2008 6:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
It's just a Spring Training game lineup
by lemon20pie on
Mar 12, 2008 9:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
who this Roberts guy?
by JB 23 on
Mar 12, 2008 10:36 PM CDT
up
0 recs
More ABs?
by stelmodad on Mar 12, 2008 4:48 PM CDT 0 recs
Enjoy this lineup now...
by MPH73 on Mar 12, 2008 4:50 PM CDT 0 recs
Quote from Lou in the linked article...
So relax. He's just trying something out. I doubt it lasts more than a day.
And between now & Friday, he could change his mind again.
by Al on Mar 12, 2008 4:54 PM CDT 0 recs
Several moving parts
It's a complicated proposition. No doubt about it. And none of the solutions are "ideal."
by MDBNIU on
Mar 12, 2008 5:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
why?
by DartmouthCubsFan on
Mar 13, 2008 2:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
sounds to me
by anormal on Mar 12, 2008 6:09 PM CDT 0 recs
Agreed...
by airweino on
Mar 12, 2008 7:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
well,
by anormal on
Mar 12, 2008 7:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
6:08 AM
by Rev Gunia on
Mar 13, 2008 6:12 AM CDT
up
0 recs
These are the kind of
The reason Lou's lineups look wierd is the roster is wierd. We have an $18 million dollar lead-off man who doesn't take pitches and can't steal anymore, but can't hit anywhere except the 1-spot (and though we signed him to play center field, he can't play there, so we have to get rid of our other left-fielder). We have a whole menagerie of second basemen, but no shortstops who can hit, so our proposed solution is to get a second baseman. We signed a $12 million dollar right fielder ideally suited for the 2-hole, but we needed a 5-hole hitter, so he'll bat there.
The reason this lineup looks so baffling is the roster is so ill-constructed, in my opinion.
by jazzypete on Mar 12, 2008 6:45 PM CDT 0 recs
I disagree
And while this roster may be ill-constructed it is better than the one we won the division with last year. They way I look at it if we get TOWDSO we can put him leadoff Dome @2 Soriano @5 and Soto@6 and we have a pretty well constructed lineup
by jds2 on
Mar 12, 2008 7:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
IF
by anormal on
Mar 12, 2008 8:00 PM CDT
up
0 recs
He's a switch hitter but fair enough
by jds2 on
Mar 12, 2008 9:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You are correct that
For example, if Furcal was such a necessity than missing out on him would cause us to overpay for Pierre (through trade) and Soriano (through free agency), then maybe he was worth the extra mil or two to get him. Maybe they should have known FOR SURE that Soriano could play center field before they gave him one of the richest contracts in baseball history to do it. Since he can't, he has made Murton essentially worthless to the team, and Soriano has become an overpaid left-fielder.
As far as second basemen go (and its menagerie, a collection of animals in captivity, as in the glass menagerie, a Tennessee Williams play), those names you mention are but a few in the long line of stockpiled second basemen that Hendry collects every year is his tenure. Every year he has one or two too many second basemen, and every year it causes problems with people unhappy with playing time, and not having enough depth at other positions.
Hendry wastes more money every year on unneccesary roster filler and replacement level players than some GMs have in their whole budget. If there is a GM who gets less return on his budget than Hendry, I'd like to know who it is. He is a terribly inefficient GM, and these lineup problems are a symptom of that.
by jazzypete on
Mar 12, 2008 9:35 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Ben Zobrist
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 11:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Theriot
by cubsfan25 on
Mar 13, 2008 12:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm with you...
by timlacy on
Mar 13, 2008 12:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
First off
Second "Hendry wastes more money every year on unneccesary roster filler and replacement level players" I guess I didn't realize that Fotenot, and cedeno we're getting paid so much they we're draining the budget.
And yes Hendry has made a few blunders but he also traded He Soip Choi for Derrick Lee and spare parts for Kenny Loften and ARam.
by jds2 on
Mar 13, 2008 6:38 AM CDT
up
0 recs
He got
Also, the fact that Cedeno and Fontenot don't make much means nothing. I don't recall saying that EVERY player on the roster was overpaid, so bringing up players who aren't overpaid is an irrelevant argument.
Lastly, it doesn't matter whether other teams were competing for Soriano. Unless he is the perfect and only solution, overpaying is overpaying no matter how many other people want to do it. If there had been a bidding war for Alex Cintron, and we ended up giving him $8 mil per year, would that be ok since other teams were bidding on him? Clearly not.
I will say Hendry has been a little wiser with his money the last couple years (Marquis signing notwithstanding), but I think that is more a function of Lou telling him what to do than anything else.
by jazzypete on
Mar 13, 2008 8:46 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Overpaying for soriano?
And the only reason I brought up cedano and fontenot was because you said Hendry waste budget on roster fillers...well our bench players are probably paid close to what other teams pay their bench players
by jds2 on
Mar 13, 2008 11:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
problem is
by ExNorthsider on Mar 12, 2008 7:27 PM CDT 0 recs
remember that it's only spring
by anormal on
Mar 12, 2008 7:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Both good posts
And let's all remember as we complain about the roster/lineup not fitting together, that it may fit together a whole lot better later this year or next year depending on how Pie develops. Next year, he may be a good 5/6 hitter allowing Fukudome to hit 2nd.
The problem remains - how do you balance Sori, DLee, and Rami in the lineup without batting them right in a row and without batting one of them 6th?
The other thing to remember about Soriano is that the reason he bats better as a leadoff hitter is because he bats better without men on base. In a certain sense I think it may just be best to say, he SLGs enough to keep him batting first and pretend the lineup really starts at #2.
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 9:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well, for the money Soriano is making a season
by lemon20pie on
Mar 12, 2008 9:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
EDIT: gd IT!!!!
by lemon20pie on
Mar 12, 2008 9:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
If that were simply the issue...
I just think it's plain stupid to put the two guys in your lineup who get on base the least in front of your guys who are supposed to drive in runs.
by cwyers on
Mar 12, 2008 9:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
If Sori could hit with men on base
Assuming you can't teach him to hit with men on base, what do you do with him?
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 11:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I think you have it backwards
by Luis on
Mar 13, 2008 2:14 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I thought
by jazzypete on
Mar 13, 2008 8:48 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Lineup construction
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/constructing-lineups
A relevant quote for us re: the 3-spot:
"One of the problems is that teams often put their highest OBP batter in the third position, but the #3 spot is the one LEAST likely to lead off the second inning. James said it, others agreed, and The Book confirms it. In addition, The Book found that the #3 hitter has more plate appearances with two out and nobody on. So the run value of every hit (except the home run) is lower in the third position than in any other of the top five positions. That's why they recommend putting your fifth-best hitter in the three spot. Whether or not you believe that, the Angels should bat Vlad fourth."
So, let's assume the Cubs acquire a speedy-lefty middle-IF with a .375 OBP, we'll call him Ryan Bobberts. What lineup could we have?
Well, Ryan Bobberts makes the most sense to lead off. And positions 6-7-8 are fairly clear, depending on whether Riot or DeRo is displaced:
Soto/DeRo
FPie
Riot/Soto
That leaves Sori, Dome, DLee, and Rami for 2-3-4-5 and let's step back and say, that's a really nice problem to have, figuring out how these guys best mesh, but batting Sori, while he's an atypical 2-hole hitter has it's advantages if it lets you bat the left-handed Dome 3rd, while one of Bobberts or Sori is on 1B. So, I think I end up batting them
Sori
Dome
DLee
Rami
by DGU on
Mar 13, 2008 2:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
well
by kylejo on
Mar 13, 2008 6:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
That's a big if
by lostinthevines on
Mar 13, 2008 6:59 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm pretty sure Theriot
Now later in the article he suggests Theriot might bat 2nd and everyone move down a spot, giving us:
L-SMIF
Riot
Sori
DLee
Rami
Dome
Soto
FPie
But that lineup seems impossible when you look at it, given the investment made in Dome and the emphasis on breaking of the RH-hitters with leftys, so I'm discounting that idea.
by DGU on
Mar 13, 2008 2:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
We bought Soriano, knowing what he was/is
Soriano is still a good hitter, he's just not going to be a high OBP hitter and he doesn't appear to be a RBI-type hitter, either. The way I look at it is this - as long as Jim Hendry thinks his lead-off hitter has to steal bases, there aren't many better lead-off men to get the most ABs in the Cubs lineup than Alfonso Soriano, who at least creates a good number of runs comapred to the outs he also makes.
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 11:10 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I kind of agree
Also, if Soto becomes the hitter most of us expect/hope he becomes he would fit great batting behind ARam.
by jds2 on
Mar 12, 2008 9:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Pie's strength is not likely
Along those lines, let's not make his speed his primary attribute when he's slugged very well, especially for his age, throughout his minor league career.
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 11:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
in my opinion
by anormal on
Mar 12, 2008 10:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
That's an interesting idea
Lefty/Speedy-MiddleIF
DLee
Dome
Rami
Sori
FPie
Soto
DeRo/Riot/EPat/RCed
But if Lee's SLGing is one of the top 2 or 3 in the lineup, it just won't happen.
by DGU on
Mar 12, 2008 11:16 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So, is Hendry a frustrated 2d baseman?
(Good points, lemon20pie.)
by Fraggin Judge on Mar 12, 2008 9:48 PM CDT 0 recs
I've seen a better
This is a joke and disgusting. I think someone needs to start a FireLou.com immediately as this is as insane as anything "Toothpick" did during his tenure.
I can only hope this is a ploy to get Soriano out of lead-off, acquire Roberts, play DeRosa at SS, and get Theriot a ticket to Iowa.
I can only hope.
by socalbob on Mar 12, 2008 9:49 PM CDT 0 recs
IT'S SPRING TRAINING, FOLKS!!!
by lostinthevines on
Mar 13, 2008 7:00 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I fail to see
Theriot leading off > Neifi leadding off > Macias leading off > a pile of feral pig droppings leading off.
by gary varsho on
Mar 13, 2008 7:05 AM CDT
up
0 recs
GV -
by lostinthevines on
Mar 13, 2008 7:16 AM CDT
up
0 recs
It's part-and-parcel
by gary varsho on
Mar 13, 2008 8:49 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I disagree
by jds2 on
Mar 13, 2008 8:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
If this trade goes down...
Robets 2b
Soriano LF
Lee 1b
Ramirez 3b
Fukudome RF
Theriot SS
Soto C
Pie CF
by mossey12 on Mar 12, 2008 10:06 PM CDT 0 recs
Any lineup with Roberts leading off
FWIW, for the 50th time, here's what my lineup would look like with Roberts:
- Roberts - almost as ideal a leadoff hitter that you can get. Most certainly the most ideal on this team anyway.
- Fukudome - Good contact hitter who can spray the ball anywhere and a great hit and run hitter.
- Lee -
- Arm -
- Soriano
- Derosa - I'd play him at 2nd (roberts SS) or SS whichever. Theriot isn't a great SS where the loss on Defense will be that glaring.
- Soto
- Pie
by lemon20pie on
Mar 12, 2008 10:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Agreed with one exception
by okiecubbie on
Mar 12, 2008 11:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Has anyone run those fancy run simulations on this
I haven't a clue how to do it. Just curious as to what the results might be.
by IllinoisCubs on Mar 13, 2008 12:07 AM CDT 0 recs
Yeah.
I've tweaked the projections a bit since the last time I ran the sims, so this isn't directly comparable to any of them. Comes to about 4.953 runs per game, which isn't that great considering the players Lou has to work with.
by cwyers on
Mar 13, 2008 12:13 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, not so good
Based on those lineup projections, Soriano is better for the team anywhere not in the leadoff spot, so this is a step in the right direction, no?
by IllinoisCubs on
Mar 13, 2008 12:24 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The lineup simulator also seems utterly convinced
by cwyers on
Mar 13, 2008 12:30 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Your data set for...
by timlacy on
Mar 13, 2008 12:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So you have some frame of reference...
I bring it up mostly so we can look at this countervailing lineup where Roberts replaces DeRosa and everyone else stays the same.
Probably our most optimal lineup with Roberts would be:
- Brian Roberts
- Derrek Lee
- Kosuke Fukudome
- Aramis Ramirez
- Geovanny Soto
- Alfonso Soriano
- Felix Pie
- Pitcher
- Ryan Theriot
If we don't land Roberts, I'd really like to take a look at Fukudome leading off, Lee batting second, and find someone to bat between Lee and Ramirez out of Soto and DeRosa.
by cwyers on
Mar 13, 2008 12:28 AM CDT
up
0 recs
When
Also, is there a reason steals are not considered in this scenario? It seems an effective basestealer would effectively have a higher sluggin percentage, since they can often turn a single into a double on the next pitch. So a hypothetical player that only hits .260/.290/.350, but literally steals every time he gets on base (so like 150 steals a year), would probably get put in the 8-spot in the sim, but nobody would ever advise putting him there.
by jazzypete on
Mar 13, 2008 9:05 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I've done that before...
You're right that the lineup simulator is ignoring several things that could probably impact the results - not just stolen bases. Baserunning in general, strikeout tendancies, home run rate, and GIDP tendencies are all things that Tom Tango looks at in his lineup simulator, which I don't have access to offhand.
But OBP and SLG are the two stats that generally get you 90% of the way, and Theriot's a good base stealer, but he's certainly not elite enough to change the analysis much.
Also, and I know this sounds counterintuitive, but realistically basestealing is more productive in the bottom half of the order. Players at the top of the order don't have to run as much because they're batting in front of players who can drive them in very well. Base stealing is more important when you're not hitting in front of the best sluggers on the team.
by cwyers on
Mar 13, 2008 11:55 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Agree with Colin...
As our rally extender/second leadoff guy I really like it, but even if we get Roberts its not going to happen.
by The Ryno and I Know on
Mar 13, 2008 9:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Eh.
by cwyers on
Mar 13, 2008 11:49 AM CDT
up
0 recs
2nd and 6th
The media is educated to sell "leading off" and "batting cleanup" and not much else.
However, they would lay off of 2nd bc it appears as "being 2nd is right behind 1st so its like being second best on the team" and the story of putting him 6th is much more controversial for the media than putting him 2nd.
If you had a murders' row of lee-fuku-ram-soto-sori, well then the media would continue to press the issue of "Lou, is Soto better then Sori? Did the team overpay for a 6th hitter? Does Sori have some physical ailments you're not disclosing?"
Mariotti would drool over drivel like this. Its true. Sori would never bat lower than 5th if healthy.
by The Ryno and I Know on
Mar 13, 2008 2:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Everyone read this
So if you don't think this line-up will work you have nothing to worry about. If it somehow works well then Piniella is a genius and all us fans are idiots. Personally I think Piniella will try it for a few days and make a change again. But with the way Theriot has hit this spring, I wouldn't be surprised if Theriot stays in the leadoff spot but Soriano and Fukudome are flipped flopped. I know Piniella wants to have a guy who can run leading off. But without Roberts most likely Soriano will get moved back to the lea


