Alfonso Soriano
I just heard Len and Bob discussing the fact that Fonzie will be back soon, and that he'll bat leadoff.
This has been discussed before, but here we are again.
Now, I love the Fonze, and I love Uncle Lou, but why is the Fonze going bak into the leadoff spot?
We have viable leadoff options in Reed Johnson and Ryan Theriot as well as Cedeno, and Fontenote off the bench. DeRosa could probably even do it on the short term.
Meanwhile, we are insisting on putting a 40 home run gun (in the past, and potentially for the future) free swinger, who struck out 130 times last season, and 160 the year before. Furthermore, with his leg injuries he may not be able to run as he once did.
So the question has to be asked; or rather the question sneed to be asked:
Should Alfonso Soriano bat leadoff
and
Why is Soriano going to bat leadoff again?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Beating a dead horse
Johnson’s lifetime OBP is .345. Theriot’s is .348. So it’s not like either one of them is a great leadoff hitter. The only true leadoff hitter we have is Fukudome, but Lou is insisting on using his one left-handed threat to break up all the righties in the middle of the order.
Soriano’s numbers are consistently better throughout his career in the leadoff spot than any other position.
Bottom line is that way too many pixels have died in service to this issue.
It's a girl! Born 1-18-08. 2246 PST. 8 lbs. 1 oz.
by Josh77 on Apr 29, 2008 11:07 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
whether we agree with it or not...
Lou has made it very clear that Soriano is going to be batting lead-off when he returns and, barring some major trade, that isn’t going to change.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 29, 2008 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I’m afraid a lot more Pixels ain’t going home to the wife and kids because of this.
I seriously doubt this will be the last time this topic is brought to discussion.
by Snake Plisskin on Apr 30, 2008 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
SELFISH!
Sori hits lead off cause he is a selfish player. No rehab stint in the minors? Anyone else think there’s a need for him to work out the kinks (pre-injury stuff as well!). I know the Cubs signed him as a leadoff threat, but I for one am not interested in seeing him hack away anytime soon in the one hole!
by socalicubsfan on Apr 29, 2008 11:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why are you selfish if you want to hit where you hit the best for the team?
If Soriano hits a .900 OPS leadoff and an .800 OPS anywhere else, why is it selfish for him to want to hit where he does the most damage?
I don’t know Soriano. He may be selfish. I just don’t get why so many others on this board are assuming he is.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2008 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
JMO -- I like Sori in the leadoff spot (on this team)
Assume that we don’t make any trades, and that Murton will get a one-way ticket to Des Moines on Thursday.
Let’s look at the lineup possibilities for Sori…
1. OK, most of his HRs are solo, but having Sori and his .900 OPS at the top makes pitchers work immediately. (See Young, Chris and Sizemore, Grady)
2. Probably the worst spot for Sori, since he would be of no help protecting a leadoff hitter trying to steal. He looked awful there at the start of the season. Why make him change his game - one that can produce a quick 360 feet - to accomodate someone trying to advance 90 feet? (This is especially true since Lou wants low-OBP speedsters leading off rather than higher-OBP guys. These guys have to try to steal to justify their place in the lineup.)
3. Normally, this is where your best hitter (combining OBP, BA, and SLG) hits. The Cubs have an ideal candidate in Lee; why move him for a guy with subpar OBP?
4. This would be the second-best place for him. He would get fastballs in front of Ramy and might hit with runners on-base. The problem is that Dome is then batting 6th (losing PAs), or batting 1st or 2nd and leaving an all-RHB middle of the order.
5. Not so good. He would see a lot of junk as teams are not scared about Dome’s power (or certainly DeRo’s). It would also present the same problems with Dome as #4.
6. Lots of breaking pitches - even DeRo gets a bunch at #6 - and easy to pitch around. Besides, I’d rather have a .900 OPS getting more PAs than Theriot.
7. Wasted in this spot.
8. See #7.
Given the current starting 8, leadoff ends up being the best spot for him. I’m not saying that he is an ideal leadoff man, only that he is the best fit given the current situation.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Apr 29, 2008 11:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My own personal view...
Was probably obvious from the initial post, but I don’t think you put him in the #1 spot.
Johnson and Theriot’s OBPs may not be ideal, but they’re better than Soriano’s career .326
To me he bats 4-5. I hesitate to move Ramirez from cleanup, but I trust Ramirez to be more patient in the 5 spot than the Fonze.
Fukudome moves to the 2 spot or 6. I’m not worried about Fukudome in the 6 spot, DRMH. He’ll get his. And, the better choice for 6 would probably be Soto, but I know he’s a rookie.
I understand that Soriano was signed to be the lead-off guy, but things change. We signed him for 8 years, we knew things would change. Maybe things have already changed, and maybe not.
And, just so everybody knows, I want to bat Soriano down in the lineup as a compliment. His bat is just to big to lead-off. Get some guys on in front of him.
by Snake Plisskin on Apr 30, 2008 12:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No way in hell...
...he should leadoff, but at this point, I am so burned out on this topic, I really don’t care where the dude hits.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Apr 30, 2008 12:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sigh...
... I think you’re right.
We could have said, a few days ago, that the team was winning with others in that spot. But now they aren’t.
So let him hit there again and see what happens.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Apr 30, 2008 3:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
This is now, and has been, topic non grata (for me anyway).
Nanika Ga Okoru!
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2008 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Little known fact
Reed Johnson has been dreadful in the leadoff role this year. Look it up. People think he’s this amazing leadoff hitter—but he’s not. Not at all actually. His line is .222/.341/.250/.591 .
by kanderber on Apr 30, 2008 7:18 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
It's a dilemma
Alfonso Soriano is a guess hitting hack that also happens to be overly sensitive. Apparently Sweet Lou needs to coddle the $136 million man, just like Cubbie managers of the past coddled Sam-ME “Corky” Steroid.
Nobody loves Piniella more than I do. But his accomodation of Soriano is a joke.
by MDBNIU on Apr 30, 2008 9:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
do us all a favor
and put your first 2 sentences in your signature so we dont have to look at it so closely. Question for you….last night when Reed Johnson came up in the ninth 2 outs and the tying run who would you like to have up Reed or Sori?
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Apr 30, 2008 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well youre wrong----well its your opinion so youre not wrong.
but in order for the Cubs to win that game it would have taken a hit from Johnson and most likely a double from Theriot.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Apr 30, 2008 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You shouldn't have bothered answering that, because...
... he would have chosen any player in baseball instead of Soriano.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Apr 30, 2008 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who would you pick?
A discplined hitter in Reed Johnson who is quite good at putting the ball in play or a free swinging guess hitting hack who may hit a home run, or more likely will strike out or fail to advance the runner?
by MDBNIU on Apr 30, 2008 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd have rather had Soriano in THAT situation.
Johnson put the ball in play—right to the third baseman for a game ending FC.
Soriano might have hit the ball out of the ballpark.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Apr 30, 2008 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may be misusing these stats...
...but Soriano’s career splits for “2 outs, RISP” (y’know, like last night) are .230/.318/.424 (.742 OPS); whereas Reed Johnson’s are .268/.330/.360 (.690 OPS). I think I’d go with Soriano, too, if only because he has the capacity to hit the ball a lot harder than Johnson.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2008 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus in that situation
with Johnson and little league Theriot coming up it take 2 HITS….Ill take Sori in that situation.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Apr 30, 2008 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gee, there's a shocker.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A guess hitting hack?
So, if 33 HR, 70 RBI, and a .299 BA is a hack, what does a good hitter do?
Sosa corked bat….MLB cut up his other 78 bats and found that they were….well, bats.
Find a flunked drug test for Sosa, a mention from anyone in the Mitchell Report….ANY kind of evidence that Sosa used steroids….
by crazymountain on Apr 30, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
its too hard to find at least some circumstantial evidence that Sosa juiced.
And the other 78 bats might have been pure, but he was at the plate with the corked one.
"When you have a fat friend there are no see-saws, only catapults." --Demetri Martin
by Reddevil on Apr 30, 2008 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, to paraphrase
Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake! I haven’t seen even circumstantial evidence of Sosa using steroids….
by crazymountain on Apr 30, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean besides the fact that he got freakishly big during the years in question?
Nanika Ga Okoru!
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2008 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freakishly? No not really


"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The man was extremely ripped back in 1990
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I was 21
I weighed about 145, wore a medium shirt. When I was 30 I weighed 205, 2x shirt. So, I did steroids? Nope, built houses…...
by crazymountain on Apr 30, 2008 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and, in anticipation....
I wore a larger hat also…..
by crazymountain on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta wonder
if constant pessimism is as tiring as I think it is.
Okay, "Wendy: hot and juicy redhead." Give this a try.
by neverAcquiesce on Apr 30, 2008 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















