Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

Burnett Refuses to back down from talk about the Cubs

This comes from the Toronto Star. 

http://www.thestar.com/Sports/Baseball/article/443988

"Blue Jays fireballer A.J. Burnett may have talked his way out of town even before the opt-out clause in his contract takes effect after this season.  Burnett insisted he was simply being honest when quoted in the Chicago Sun-Times yesterday as being receptive to an opportunity to play in a baseball-mad city like Chicago.  I don't really care about how the fans take it," Burnett said. "If they won't read the part where I said where I'm at in my mind (focused on Toronto), whatever. I'm a Blue Jay now and I'm a Blue Jay until they tell me otherwise. I'm proud of that."

I guess I am left feeling pretty divided about this.  On one hand it makes me a little giddy that a guy like Burnett blatantly says that he would love to come to Chicago.

But on the other hand, reading further into the article in a start Burnett got shelled and he left the field mocking the fans by tipping his cap to them.  Is this a guy we even want around our team chemistry?  Maddux has never done anything even remotely close to this on a mound, but Zambrano hasn't exactly been the most classy player to grace the sacred ground at Wrigley.

Like we have all said, if a guy like Burnett can help us win a championship then I have no problem bringing him over to the Friendly Confines.  Curious as how other are perceiving his situation as it continues to develope.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs  |  Comment 69 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'd take A.J. Burnett in a nanosecond

If the Cubs want to solidify their playoff chances then acquisition of a primetime starting pitcher is imperative. A.J. Burnett would look awfully good in the Cub rotation pitching behind Carlos Zambrano.

Rich Harden !! 8 starts, 3-0, 47 IP, 58 Ks, 2.85 ERA

by MDBNIU on Jun 16, 2008 12:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

agreed

aj burnett has the stuff to dominate anytime he takes the mound. in the NL, and re-focused with the current best team in baseball one can imagine him turning it on bigtime. would love this move if the cubs make it.

The Aramis BB/K Watch: 40 BB to 41 K's. Im not sure who the last Cub to have more bb's than k's was, but Im sure it was a very long time ago.

by kylejo on Jun 16, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And he EATS INNINGS, which will help Marmolade

Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

by dtpollitt on Jun 16, 2008 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He eats innings?

I think we need to work on a new definition of innings-eater. Burnett has only topped 180 IP twice in his career. Don’t get me wrong – I’d love to have him. But he’s not what I’d call an innings-eater.

by SouthernCub on Jun 16, 2008 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

Apparently, MDBNIU would like to get an entire pitching staff full of injury-prone guys.

Me, I’ll stick with what we have, because they’re winning.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jun 16, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

You can think what you want Al. Me? My head tells me a starting rotation to include Ryan Dempster, Ted Lilly, Jason Marquis and a green Sean Gallagher isn’t good enough come September and October baseball. The mission is simple—win a World Series. If the starting pitching isn’t there to do that (and it’s not) then going after a blue chip pitching talent like A.J. Burnett or Rich Harden is what needs to happen.

Rich Harden !! 8 starts, 3-0, 47 IP, 58 Ks, 2.85 ERA

by MDBNIU on Jun 16, 2008 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're not addressing Al's point.

That is, Harden is perenially injured. And, of course, Marquis and Gallagher more than likely won’t be in the picture in October anyway.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jun 16, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ummmm...have you compared our staff to others?

We seem to be pretty good. Harden ISN’T the solution to a solid top 3 rotation, MDBNIU. It has been pointed out to you in terms of statistics, DL, cost that the A’s would demand and just general terms a first grader could understand. The mission is to win the World Series EVERY year, not just this year. I’m curious…..do you think we could make a trade with the Phils, say Marquis and Theriot for Utley and Rollins? The Phillie’s consideration of such a trade is as ridiculous a thought as the Cubs getting Harden from the A’s…

by crazymountain on Jun 16, 2008 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Notice MDBNIU didn't mention Zambrano.

Wonder why?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jun 16, 2008 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zambrano

Zambrano is a given. We all know that he is a 1a, but our 1a lost to someone else’s 1a last October. That is going to happen. I think, and I dont want to speak for MDBNIU, he meant that our 2nd option should be far more reliable, or better, than Lilly or Demp. Demp has been great, but Demp hasnt proven to me or anyone else, that he can win on the road or pitch like he has for 6 months.

Harden and Burnett are injured a lot, but there are other options out there that will help.

Tell me honestly. If it was us and the Dbacks again this October, would you prefer Dempster or Lilly vs. their #2 (Dan Haren), or would you rather see Burnett or Harden? I am aware that Lilly and the Cubs beat Haren back in April, but I would rather increase our odds a tad with one of them, rather than hope Demp (who hasnt started for an entire season since his Marlins days) or Lilly (who is a little less than dependable this season).

by louslovechild on Jun 16, 2008 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This year's different from last year.

Remember, the Cubs swept Arizona in May—and the D’backs don’t look so dominant right now, do they?

I like this pitching staff and they are getting more consistent. Burnett and Harden are as likely to be on the DL as on a pitching staff by September.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jun 17, 2008 6:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

He has a lot of good years under his belt and I believe he can be a leader.

"Check the magic of a winning season and there are always reasons beyond the talent." Ned Colleti

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jun 16, 2008 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, you and fndr5 posted a fanpost on this topic...

...at exactly the same time. 11:51 am. So who’s gonna blink?

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jun 16, 2008 12:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

AJ Burnett is a huge pitching improvement

granted that he stays healthy throughout the season and hopefully the postseason as well. He’s also a cheaper option than someone like Rich Harden, who Billy Beane is asking a fortune for. He’s got great stuff and I would love it if he came to Chicago.

I think my favorite uncle was Uncle Caveman. We called him that because he lived in a cave and would eat one of us. We then realized he was a bear.

by deepthoughtsbyjackhandey on Jun 16, 2008 12:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Stop talking about Maddux

We do not want him back, we have enough 3-4 spot in the rotation pitchers, he will never be a number 2 pitcher again, sorry.

"This is why Major League Baseball does not need instant replay, because then every single play will then be reviewed." -- Joe Morgan, 5/18/08, referring to an umpire ruling a Carlos Delgado homerun foul when replays showed it hit the foul pole.

by CubsBall2202 on Jun 16, 2008 12:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nobody's asking to have him back for that reason.

If you don’t understand now the reasons many of us would like Maddux back, you never will.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jun 16, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's true.

Sentimentality is hard for people on the outside to understand.

by Wreckard on Jun 16, 2008 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sentimentality doesn't win games.

Acquiring a pitcher for sentimental reasons is horribly irresponsible. The Cubs are trying to win the World Series, not write a happy ending to Greg Maddux’s career.

by kanderber on Jun 16, 2008 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about doing both?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jun 16, 2008 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to see both

But I don’t see Greg Maddux as an upgrade to this team. His numbers away from Petco (and away from the cavernous NL West stadiums if you want to look even closer) the last couple years are pretty terrible.

by kanderber on Jun 16, 2008 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thought i'd post a response in this thread too

Maddux coming back to me is a segue to him taking over for Rothschild (in my head). I can’t imagine a more knowledgeable pitcher in the game who could contribute both on and off the field. And he deserves to win one here.

by fndr5 on Jun 17, 2008 3:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

And I think that sentimentality is the only thing Maddux has over, say, Marquis, who he would replace. Otherwise they’re pretty similar pitchers at this point in their careers.

by Wreckard on Jun 17, 2008 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I wouldn't mind having him back as say a 4 or 5 starter to replace marquis

but what’s the price of getting maddux and will we still be able to get a top tier pitcher after that.

"This is why Major League Baseball does not need instant replay, because then every single play will then be reviewed." -- Joe Morgan, 5/18/08, referring to an umpire ruling a Carlos Delgado homerun foul when replays showed it hit the foul pole.

by CubsBall2202 on Jun 16, 2008 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring on Burnett

We need Burnett, especially since Marquis is so unpredictable. But getting Burnett probably won’t happen since the Jays will be wanting too much in return. Go CUB!

by The Raf-Man Love the CUB! on Jun 16, 2008 12:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would rather get, ahem, Sabathia as well.

And let’s hope the Cubs don’t use that sobriquet when communicating with his agent.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jun 16, 2008 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lmao

"The 12 second rule is how long it takes Carlos Lee to hear, turn around, run over, find and eat a hot dog dropped by a fan in the Crawford Boxes at Minute Maid park" - ballhawk

by MScubbie on Jun 16, 2008 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I always called him

Chocolate Cake Sabathia. I would love to have him though I doubt it will happen. That division is so nutty anything could happen.

"I'm not giving him a high-five ever again." - Sammy Sosa, joking about Moises Alou's personal habits

by MorePiePlease on Jun 16, 2008 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I would rather have

Sabathia .. a rotation of Zambrano-Burnett-Lilly-Dempster-Gallagher would be excellent!

As long as Hendry doesn’t trade Gallagher I’m happy .. trade anybody in the farm, but do not trade Gallagher.

My new life, my new world, and my beautiful daughter:
Kayla Davis: Due date (8-11-08)!

by Unique on Jun 16, 2008 12:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Greinke

If I get to choose any of the pitchers rumored to be on the market, the one I want is Zack Greinke: 3.48 ERA, 1.30 WHIP, no injury-worries, a fresh arm, 24 years old, and we’ll have him under control for more than just half a year.

And the dream scenario is to find a way to get Greinke and Maddux on the same team (but not totally a dream because if we need two pitchers something has gone wrong somewhere).

by DGU on Jun 16, 2008 12:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I doubt it will happen

The Royals won’t give up Greinke for the same reasons we’d like to have him-young and under contract for longer than half a year. Plus, trading him would be like waving the white flag, and the Royals are trying to give the impression that they want to win sooner rather than later. Trading your ace is not a good way to send that message to the fans.

by Tate491 on Jun 16, 2008 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everybody has their price though.

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Jun 16, 2008 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually read something the other day

that said the pitcher the Royals WILL NOT part with is Meche. It was something about the Cubs having interest in trading for Meche(rumors of course) and Meche saying it wouldn’t happen because of his NTC. Then the Royals GM saying that they wouldn’t be able to make their run in ‘10 without Meche. I have heard of no such support for Greinke from the Royals. IMO, he would be the guy to go after if he became availabe.

"I'm not giving him a high-five ever again." - Sammy Sosa, joking about Moises Alou's personal habits

by MorePiePlease on Jun 16, 2008 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to see where Greinke is on the market

People keep bringing him up but I’ve never seen anything that says the Royals are shopping him.

by rlpete on Jun 16, 2008 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do not view Burnett as a true ace...

So if we trade for him, I hope he doesn’t command an “ace” type bounty in return. He has never won more than 12 games in a season (he should this season however) and always has an ERA in the high 3’s.

Looks like a solid #2.

by smitster2008 on Jun 16, 2008 1:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Getting to the playoffs

Burnett could possibly help with this, but I don’t see how he improves us that much for a playoff run since you really only need 3 starters. Unlike others, I don’t see him as a solid #2. Between him and Lilly it is basically a toss up (except Lilly is less likely to get injured) and Dempster has outpitched both of them.

If we could get him relatively cheap, I would do it but I wouldn’t give up much.

by madeindetroit on Jun 16, 2008 1:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

In Burnett's defense...

Z did something very similar last year after fans gave him a hard time about a bad start, and we all still love Big Z and wouldn’t ever say he was a bad influence in the clubhouse.

I’m not saying I’m in love with the idea of Burnett, just something to think about.

by jbgindy on Jun 16, 2008 2:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I saw Burnett at Wrigley...

a few years ago when he was with the Marlins. He wasn’t pitching that day, but he was in the outfield shagging flys and long tossing. Rumor then was that the Cubs might be after him later that year or as a FA.

Burnett started out acting like what I thought to be a complete jackass – throwing balls over the bleachers onto the street, etc. Just toward the end of BP, he came out on the RF line and dumped a bucket of balls out on the ground. he then proceeded to throw them into the bleachers to fans. He then walked into the grounds crew storage under the bleachers and 10 minutes later was sitting in the bleachers signing autographs.

Either he’s a pretty cool guy or a complete egomaniac…..you decide.

by MSCub on Jun 16, 2008 4:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ah...

I dunno about Burnett. I think the Cubs could do better going out and getting somebody else. Besides, he could have kept his opinions to himself, and if he wanted to leave, he could have just told his GM to trade him. He didn’t need to turn it into something public. I do wonder if his “makeup” isn’t right for this team.

by TheHawkRules on Jun 16, 2008 4:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Besides...

I want to add that he makes how much this season? 13 million? He’s only averaged 10 wins over the last two seasons. I wouldn’t want to pay that much when Lieber prolly could do the same thing, just much cheaper.

by TheHawkRules on Jun 16, 2008 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wins? You're judging his performance on wins?

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Jun 16, 2008 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah! You're right!

I don’t really love his ERA either… especially this year.

by TheHawkRules on Jun 16, 2008 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His K/BB ratio is nice...

but he gives up too many HR’s. He’s a big injury risk, and is relatively expensive. If Toronto wants to eat salary, then maybe. I’m highly skeptical that Hendry really wants him.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Jun 16, 2008 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

amen

You’re preaching it the way I like it bro. Keep it up!

by TheHawkRules on Jun 16, 2008 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Burnett did show loyalty to Toronto. But...

he knows the team is cleaning house and he’ll probably be gone before the season’s over. Burnett was asked about Chicago and he favored the Cubs as an alternative to go play for. That’s all.

He would be an improvement over Gallagher, for example, and whether a trade for him would be worth it depends on what it costs the Cubs. I agree with MDBNIU that the Cubs need a starter (and perhaps a reliever too, down the road if Lou keeps burning the arms of a few of those who are now in the bullpen) to be favorites to win it all in October.

by Fraggin Judge on Jun 16, 2008 5:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would love to have Burnett.....

provided we get CC first and AJ doesn’t cost a lot. The Indians have spent an awful lot of resources scouting our guys, major and minors. As I said between Matlock updates on the game post, I think Shapiro has already talked to Hendry. And, I don’t think Jim would pull the trigger UNLESS a long term deal was already on the board with CC. Burnett would be fine, if he is cheap, as his injury history is unsettling. That being said, I think that, above all, we keep Gallagher. IF we get a signed CC, Burnett looks really good in the pinstripes…

by crazymountain on Jun 16, 2008 6:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No to Burnett, he's a clubhouse cancer

signed,

Jim Edmonds haters

Before Edmonds: 24-16, (.600); With Edmonds: 21-9 (.700)
Edmonds with Cubs: .309 / .342 / .515

by joeschmitt on Jun 16, 2008 8:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't look now but....

I heard on the local sports radio this morning that the Yankees have their eyes on CC. I’d certainly prefer him over any of the other alternatives discussed on this thread.

IF IT TAKES FOREVER!!

by Cubfansince1957 on Jun 16, 2008 8:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

they don't have the young talent that we have to offer in trade, do they?

plus, all else being equal, cleveland would much rather help us than their AL rival.

Before Edmonds: 24-16, (.600); With Edmonds: 21-9 (.700)
Edmonds with Cubs: .309 / .342 / .515

by joeschmitt on Jun 16, 2008 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

can you be a bit more specific on which "young talent" you'd trade?

in other words, are you willing to trade some legitimate talent or the usual collection of Murton, Hill, Pie, Cedeno, et al. that are usually mentioned here in trade scenarios.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 16, 2008 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i dunno

i leave that to the experts. just saying i was under the impression we had more to offer than the yankees.

Before Edmonds: 24-16, (.600); With Edmonds: 21-9 (.700)
Edmonds with Cubs: .309 / .342 / .515

by joeschmitt on Jun 17, 2008 3:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome to the imaginary trade department!

Cubs get:
SP Tim Lincecum

Giants get:
SS Ryan Theriot
CF Felix Pie
SP Donald Veal
SP Jeff Samardzija

That would totally happen, right?

Alan Trammell: Assistant (to the) Manager

by northsider on Jun 16, 2008 9:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

from Theriot alone

Alan Trammell: Assistant (to the) Manager

by northsider on Jun 16, 2008 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe if the trade from the Giant's side went:

SP Tin Lincecum
GM Brian Sabean

Sabean would need to get himself outta town after that one.

I do wish he was a storied former Cub, a la McHale and West in the NBA…maybe we can steal some talent from the Dodgers.

by jbau on Jun 16, 2008 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball
Small
Don't Make the Mistake of Dumping Bradley

Recent FanPosts

66103_small
The Ordinary Wizarding Levels of Milton Bradley & the 2009 Chicago Cubs
Sandberg94home_small
An argument for Mike Cameron
P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night
Helmet_small
Az Fall League Cubs
4167bqf31ml
Five tool player available!
Self-portrait-4_small
This Might Be A Long Shot...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?
Gary Matthews Jr.

Recent FanShots

Cubs GM Jim Hendry says Milton Bradley may be back in 2010, and called the outfielder's '09 season a "major hiccup"
Bradley 3 Way-Trade????
This ought to end any MB for Wells talk...
The incongruity of our perceptions and probabilities
SC takes some BP before this past weekend's AFL RSG.
Happy Birthday, Al!
Chicago Cubs Headlines for Monday (Chicago Now)
Not a rumor, Bruce Miles speculates on a Bradley trade with good return
OT: Lidge to have surgery
OT, sexist and imho funny

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman