I Think We're A Bit Broke...
So many people will say, in response for the call to seek out more pitching, "If it aint broke don't fix it". This is my explanation as to why I believe we are broke.
Now this is not a panic post in any way as we have lost 1 in the last 10 games. This team is clicking in ALMOST every way possible. My issue is this: our team has won quite a few of the last 10 games by "picking up our struggling pitchers". IMHO, a c hampionship team wins based on it's solid offense AND its solid pitching. My breakdown:
Zambrano: Well what to say? He is what we want him to be so no complaints here.
Lilly: Yesterday's game looks a lot better in the box than it did while the game was being played. People will say when you give up 2 runs, your offense ought to be able to win. Well, not if it has spent the last 10 games doing just that. Lilly gives up too many lead off hits, he didn't appear to be hitting his spot as well as he wanted to, and as usual, he gives up too many 1st inning runs. He also appears to tire out and seems to have a tendency to unravel as things get more difficult. His defense has also picked him up quite a bit as of late.
Dempster: Again, pleasantly surprised and happy with his performances.
Hill: Well, he's gone but we were all counting on him this offseason.
Marquis: Oh please! This guy is just not going to cut it. He gives back almost every run our offense picks up. this is not a recipe for success. he is likely going to get worse IMO. A god sinker ball pitcher locates and induces the ground ball outs the team needs. Jason Marquis does not.
Gallagher: I like him so far...so far.
Lieber: Great long man. May be our answer but i like the security he brings to our pen/rotation.
So...I believe this club NEEDS to add a solid #2/#3 pitcher to its rotation. I think that a team will tire out having to "pick up struggling pitchers" If this were October, I would be less worried as they would appear to have maintained and have it in them. It's not though, and therefore, I think that Hendry needs to be on the prowl sooner than later. This club needs to be well rested so as not to tank a la 2007 should we be where we are now, in October.
PS. I know the issue is who is available. I cannot make that statement but it is Hendry's job to at least identify the need and find a solution if one exists.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
1 recs |
131 comments
Comments
Framing the issue
Where you stand here often depends on the question you are posing:
Can this staff get to the playoffs? Answer: Yes.
Can this staff win in the playoffs? Answer: Let’s add another starter, please.
by TC Cubby on Jun 5, 2008 9:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Perfect summation.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, thank you
Perfect before noon? I’m taking the rest of the day off
by TC Cubby on Jun 5, 2008 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You may...
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's my thought also
good enough to get there but not good enough to win those first two. This is starting to remind me of Lou’s good Seattle teams, a lot of wins and nothing to show for it.
This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).
by mrcubsfan on Jun 5, 2008 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That 2001 Seattle team...
... that won 116 games, worries me, because they SHOULD have blown through the playoffs.
Does anyone have any recollection of why they didn’t?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They ran into the Yankees
Yankees were on a mission that year for 9/11.
"Please move away from this vector and get into another coordinate pronto. There's no access for you in this quadrant." Mike Donnelly
by McRipper on Jun 5, 2008 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Starting pitching was the achilles heel for Seattle
That and a New York Yankees team on a mission and with a Murderer’s Row lineup.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't exactly "Murderers' Row".
Here’s the series, the 2001 ALCS.
The Yankees won the first two games by 4-2 and 3-2; the Mariners won game 3 14-3; the Yankees won game 4 3-1 and game 5 12-3, so they were about even in runs scored for the series.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
Soft tossing Jamie Moyer also fronted the Seattle pitching staff. Which is hint of problem for this Cub team. If you look at the teams who have done best in the playoffs most had power pitchers who dialed it up a notch in October. Besides Carlos Zambrano our staff is devoid of quintessential power pitchers. Even the great Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine have lousy playoff track records.
Hence why there is critical need for Jim Hendry to add a primetime power pitcher to the mix.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
2001 Seattle starting pitchers....case proven
Their rotation that year? Jamie Moyer, John Halama (another soft tossing lefty), Freddy Garcia, Aaron Sele, Brett Tomko. Though they won 116 games that year I doubt that anybody would find that rotation awe inspiring. The only “power pitcher” among was Freddy Garcia.
It reinforces what the Cubs need to do AND THAT IS ADD ANOTHER POWER PITCHER TO COMPLEMENT CARLOS ZAMBRANO.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This pitching staff is already better than that Seattle staff.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
100% agreed!!!
"Please move away from this vector and get into another coordinate pronto. There's no access for you in this quadrant." Mike Donnelly
by McRipper on Jun 5, 2008 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
word
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, word up!

Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe, if you want to include Brett Tomko
but since he wasn’t a part of the rotation, he should be left off. But it doesen’t matter, that Seattle staff was better simply because they didn’t have a Jason Marquis or a Ted Lilly holding them down. Their worst starting pitcher that year was John Halama and he only started 17 games and he still put up better numbers than Marquis and Lilly.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta stick up for my man Ted Lilly here...
...or at least ask the question: Has he really been holding this team down? Granted, his first three starts were pretty dreadful. But he’s given the Cubs a quality start in 7 of his last 10 starts (racking up double-digit Ks in two of those games). And his ERA has been declining steadily since his first start.
I know, I know…had it not been for the Cubs miracle offense, the game against the Rockies would have been a blowout loss. But last night’s game was quite a comeback, no? What I guess I’m saying is that I would argue that Lilly has been inconsistent but not necessarily bad.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Offense helps a lot
and I never said Lilly was holding down the team, I said holding down the rotation. And he is (as is Marquis). Basically, is the 2008 version of Zambrano, Lilly, Dempster, Marquis, Gallagher/Hill better than the 2001 versions of Garcia, Moyer, Sele, Abbott, Halama/Piniero?
I still say no, and it has everthing to do with Marquis and Lilly and the positions they hold within the rotation. The top 3 starters for these Cubs in terms of starts is Zambrano, Lilly Dempster as opposed to Garcia, Moyer, Sele for Seattle. Right there, you have Lilly getting the most starts on the team and has performed the worst of all pitchers in the rotation. Plus you have Dempster who has been really good, but I think the jury is still out on what he will do in the 2nd half of the season.
There is no weak link in the Mariners top 3.
Then when you look at the bottom to spots of the rotation, the cubs have Marquis and Gallager/Hill vs. the Mariners Abbott and Halama/Piniero. Abbott was average that year while Piniero was lights out.
Once again, I tend to favor the 2001 Seattle Mariners starting rotation over the 2008 Chicago Cubs and it has everything to do with Ted Lilly and Jason Marquis.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I guess I see what you mean.
Of course, you have the benefit of hindsight with that Seattle team. We still don’t really know definitively how history will judge this ‘08 rotation. I still have hope that Lilly will turn in another good season.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparing the top 3
Player / ERA+ (2001)
Jamie Moyer – 121
Freddy Garcia – 136
Aaron Sele – 116
Player / ERA+ (2008)
Zambrano – 176 (!)
Lilly – 85 (yuck)
Demptster – 161
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how did Ted Lilly
hold this team down yesterday?
Answer: He didn’t. ONE run through 7, and then the second run after he should have been taken out anyway.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But that is what I said initially
the numbers do not look great but between his laboring innings and the pitching staff’s ultimate tendency to make this offense work overtime to “pick them up”, the offense gets tired. They cannot carry the team the whiole way.
It is not so much last nights performance but the sum of all the performances by 3, 4, and 5.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course the offense carries the team
you can’t win if you don’t score runs.
Maddux was on last night. Sometimes you just lose. It was a good game.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
you win with pitching AND offense. If a rotation continually shows up lame (not including last night) then an offense tires out, especially if it is only june 5th.
What I am saying is outside of Z and Usually Demp, I lack confidence in our rotation. This is not a characteristic of a championship team.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep...
This Cub team is loaded in what is a weak National League. Our only achilles heel is a less than stellar starting rotation. This team craves a primetime starting pitcher in the mold of Rich Harden. Otherwise I fear we will yet again have a very disappointing end of the season.
When you haven’t won a World Series since 1908 and you’re team is as good as this one? Well then you should pull out ALL the stops to make sure you can get over the top. Even if it means sacrificing part of the future.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, will you ever get tired of bringing up his name?
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect the answer is...
no. Tell me he doesn’t remind you a bit of Mr. Wu though? Rich Harden? Good! Felix Pie? No good!!
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, he reminds me of an old toy
I think it was called See-N-Say. Big round thing, you pull a string, arrow spins to an animal, and a voice tells you how the animal sounds.
[pulls string…]
[toy voice] This is a Blue Mike. And Blue Mike goes “Rich Haaaaaaaaaaarden…”
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Jun 5, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha ha...I had one of those. Yeah, that suits him to a tee.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
too bad we don't have a pic of him
I could see SWL creating a see and say for us.
by Shanghai Badger on Jun 5, 2008 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
pete's sake.
will you give up on this guy? He’s a doctor’s dream. Money for golf-clubs EVERYWHERE.
And you don’t want to sacrifice “part” of the future, you want to sacrifice ALL of the future.
Harden is not the answer. I think the rotation will be beefed up from within the team.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should instead
focus all our resources on getting Joba for our #2 starter.
SARCASM
This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Ray. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again.
by HectorVillanueva on Jun 5, 2008 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Lets package Marquis (who doesn’t look like he wants to be here anyway) and some minor leagueres for a solid starter, that is if any are available.
Svelte
by ryanbrixenivy on Jun 5, 2008 9:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wishful thinking
I seriously doubt that Marquis is going anywhere. The only teams who might be interested in unloading a solid #2 are the ones who will be out of the race by the deadline, and none of them would take his salary. The only way I see it happening is if the Cubs eat most of his salary, and that isn’t likely.
by Tate491 on Jun 5, 2008 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
and part of my thought is that Marquis doesn’t necessarily ahve to go anywhere to improve. He is a serviceable 5 starter. Gallagher, while promising, can benefit from a bit more time at AAA. i just want new arms, don’t HAVE to get rid of MArquis.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gallagher
You’re right, we do have the luxury of sending Gallagher back down if we get a better option. What concerns me though is that the reason Marquis has been serviceable in the past is his ability to eat innings, which is not really the case so far this season.
by Tate491 on Jun 5, 2008 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marquis
Nobody on this planet is going to take Jason Marquis. Not with the ridiculous amount of money owed him thru 2009. He is all ours for the duration.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless the Cubs eat part of the contract...
... or take someone else’s bad contract in return.
That’s not likely, and I don’t know who fits that description. But it’s the only way.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, basically...
You like the staff, but are dissatisfied with the 5th starter? I can think of 20 teams around the league that would love to have that problem, and another eight “contenders” that have the same problems. You come up with a talent likely to be available at the deadline that’s an upgrade, and I’ll help you campaign. Seriously. And please, no more Rich Harden.
As an aside though, I’m a little surprised that Al’s mention of the Kevin Millwood rumor didn’t garner more comment. He looks back to his April form after that trip to the DL.
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 10:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I haven't heard Gil Meche's name brought up
I’m not necessarily advocating a trade for Meche, but the Royals have to be looking to dump that contract for some young players. A few years ago, when the Cubs signed Marquis, I know a lot of fans were hoping for Suppan or Meche instead (I know I was hoping for Suppan over Marquis).
What do you all think of trading a few youngsters for Meche? I can’t imagine he’d cost a lot (in players) since his contract is a little ridiculous. I’m not saying he’s a number 2 by any means, but he may be an innings eater that at least keeps the team in most game he pitches.
This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Ray. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again.
by HectorVillanueva on Jun 5, 2008 10:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it's a non-starter...
Gil Meche was a credibility signing, with Drayton Moore attempting to signal that the Royals had a new path, and management was committed to winning. To deal him now for prospects suggests that it’s back to rebuilding mode, which would have negative implications to their fan base, and probably not only kill single-tickets sales for this year, but season-ticket sales for next year. Maybe you trade him in the off-season, but it’s a bad message that I don’t believe Drayton will make right now; even if perhaps he should.
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meche has three plus years left on his deal...
... at $11 million a year. Forget it.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seemed to me
that Lilly got BETTER as the game went on. His velocity went up, his location got better.
He shouldn’t have been left in for the 8th. Period.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 10:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That I agree with!
Not sure what Lou was thinking with Relievers ready in the pen.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I worry...
... that some of the pitching will wear out in the 2nd half.
Basically, it’s Marmol and Dempster. I really worry that they’ll both tire out and won’t be nowhere near as effective in the 2nd half. And you’ve seen how dependent upon them both we are right now. I have a feeling Wood won’t tank and I wonder if Lou will end up using him a lot more than just closer if Marmol does tucker out.
Anyway, we are going to need some more pitching… you just cannot expect those two guys to carry the load for a full season like they have.
by TheHawkRules on Jun 5, 2008 10:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
available pitchers
i hope i can eat my words but I predict there wont be any better pitcher available than what we have.
millwood-hurt all the time
harden-didnt he sign with the pads
padilla-his arm is still intact
burnett-billion dollar contract and #1 dl filler
blanton—-marquis esque??
anyone else??
It might beeeeee!! It could beeeeeee!! It issssss!! Homerun!! Holyyyyyyy Cow!!!
by cubsluver22 on Jun 5, 2008 10:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think our pitching buffer
comes from within the organization. Maybe it’ll be Hill, or Marshal, or (god help me) even Neil Cotts or Ascanio.
This offense has been able to hit good pitching so far. There’s no reason to think that’ll end. If it DOES happen, well, then that’s what happens.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should we be this worried?
In the National League the Cubs staff is second in runs allowed behind only Atlanta, and ahead of eveyone in run differential. Our pitching problems are starter’s inconsistencies and not one of the people available is going to help bouy that. Unless a truly reliable starter becomes available the team is better off standing pat, and resovling the problem from the seven starters they already have.
"It's a pier 9 brawl!..."
by rrobinson on Jun 5, 2008 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
I think our depth chart is good enough. No one’s going to be available at the deadline who will be able to address these issues anyway. Harden is a walking injury.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am speaking from the "win now"
standpoint that apparently this team is working with. Win now = proven pitching staff to work along side powerful productive offense.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hendry will make a move
Hendry will make a move if needed, I have no doubt about that, and the trading deadline is July 31st so it probably won’t happen anytime soon. I don’t think the Cubs will go into the playoffs with this rotation. Last year they made the weak move of picking up Trachsel…this year they will get somebody to move the meter…I’d be shocked if they didn’t.
by jeff_pico on Jun 5, 2008 10:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Let me ask a question...
and this isn’t so much directed at you as to the general audience. Could someone give me a few examples of “move the meter” talent that we might envision becoming available in July?
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
possible pickups
CC Sabathia would be number one on any list, as has been mentioned here the oft injured Rich Harden, Joe Blanton. Its hard to tell who might fall out of contention right now and who will be the buyers and sellers.
by jeff_pico on Jun 5, 2008 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
The trading deadline is more than seven weeks away. We just don’t know who will be out there, yet.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why...
I asked. I’m having trouble following posters who keep talking about “power pitchers that Jim needs to go get”. I’m interested to know who they’re speaking of, as I don’t know of any either readily available, or likely to be in July, for that matter.
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My response is this
while I cannot say who IS available…I can say that if Hendry is willing to part ways with talent, he can approach some of these basement clubs with top starters and try to amke it happen now…before all the winning teams want a piece of these pitchers in late july.
Not saying it can be done, but it never hurts to pick up the phone and try. NO, I am not saying I know Hendry hasn’t just sayin…
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which starters are you talking about, specifically?
Name names.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I keep asking!!...
And all I get are tumbleweeds.
Tell you what, let me start if off. Vincente Padilla. Scouts like what they’ve seen this year. Rumor has it he’s got a 5 dollar arm, but a ten cent head. Easily the nastiest of the “trade candidates”. But the Ranger have a shot at .500 - and an outside chance at the WC - and probably shouldn’t be dealing pitching anyway. What exactly is the pitch to get Jon Daniels to make that move.
But if you want to insert your own name and scenario, don’t worry. I’ll wait.
by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
until you can say
“who IS available” what’s the point of talking to anyone, or even having this conversation???
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The reason I don't talk to anyone is I cannot do so.
Pleanty of names have come up as possibilities. Millwood, Padilla as mentioned above, Blanton, CC is not going to happen. Grienke perhaps? Not sure. BUT, the point is this…IT CANNOT HURT FOR HENDRY TO BE WORKING ON ANY POSSIBILITIES.
There I named names.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The other name that was mentioned
was Bonderman. It would be nice, if Hendry had the pieces to make it happen, to pull that off under the radar. I lie his stuff and he is young enough.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bonderman vs Marquis
ERA + 2008, 2007:
Bonderman 97, 91
Marquis 88, 101
Not only is he not the #2 you say we need, he’s not even much of an improvement over our #5. I’d argue that given that they’re equally valuable on the mound, Marquis’ ability to pinch hit and pinch run makes him the more valuable player of the two.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm rooting
for the Rays to tank ASAP. If they get into selling mode, how about a blockbuster that gets us Shields and Upton? Solves the pitching and CF issues. I’d been saving this one for when Paul Sullivan does his wild and whacky trade suggestion mailbag, but I can’t bear to wait that long to have someone shoot it full of holes.
by goldglove on Jun 5, 2008 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
I’ve heard the Rays are dying to get Marquis and Pie and would be willing to give up anything to get those guys. Shields and Upton? No questions asked.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if the Rays were to tank
...which I don’t see happening – why on earth would they sell 2 guys who they have under cheap club control for multiple years? Shields just signed a 4 year, $12M deal to buy out his arb years. He’s the cornerstone of their future, along with Scott Kazmir.
The Rays are set up to content for multiple years to come. Anything they would sell would come at a very, very high price.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what your smoking??
can I have a little? please please—-this just in were trading pie and the shark to the mets for beltran,johan, and 100 million dollars.
It might beeeeee!! It could beeeeeee!! It issssss!! Homerun!! Holyyyyyyy Cow!!!
by cubsluver22 on Jun 5, 2008 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sullivan
He’s as bad sometimes as that Bulls reporter at the Trib, who every other day comes up with some goofy trade idea that will bring the Bulls back to the Jordan days.
"Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had better learn baseball." - Jacque Barzun
by Bump Bailey on Jun 5, 2008 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good grief
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pardon?

Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's one of the goofiest suggestions I have ever heard on this site.
Shields and Upton? Those are the building blocks for that franchise for a decade. They’re not going anywhere, period.
And I don’t think the Rays are tanking, either.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I thought this didn't make sense...

by Damen Jackson on Jun 5, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You thought Alfonso Soriano didn't make sense? Or the guy wearing his hat backward?
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The fact that the scoreboad
Says Soriano is 0-3 with a solo homer. I mentioned this about 2 weeks ago because I was at a series of games when the scoreboard made no sense. I was actually at this game, and sitting on the other side of the LF bleachers
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Jun 5, 2008 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, OK. I didn't even notice that.
The guy running that sign must be a real saber-magician.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not the first time the board has been wrong.
Whoever is running it this year needs some help.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This ad brought to you by the fine school system in Chicago...
courtesy of the CTU.
by blackhawk24 on Jun 5, 2008 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
bet the guy lives in Evanston or Wilmette
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Jun 6, 2008 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If it were not for our amazing offense, Marquis and Lilly would be the story this year (and not in a good way). We are lucky to have the record we do with the poor pitching of our 3-5 starters.
We need more consistent pitching (either from inside or outside) if we’re to advance in the playoffs. I can’t imagine our offense being able to keep this up
I haz show: http://hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Jun 5, 2008 11:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is kind of a pointless conversation at this point in the season
In the short term, the best improvement we can hope for is for Hill to come back and be the number 2 starter he has the potential to be.
No one is really so out of it that they’ll be in a sell now mode for another month. Even then, which teams are likely enough to be out of it to be selling? You’re looking at maybe a Zack Greinke type at best, and I’m not sure he’s worth the very very high price that the Royals would reportedly be asking for. Same goes for Daniel Cabrera – he’d maybe be available but I’m just not a believer.
MLB Trade Rumors has a very good rundown of the kinds of names that might be available by the end of the year. The only names I like on there are Sabathia and maybe Burnett, and I’m not convinced either of those teams are going to be out of it come the trade deadline.
But again, no one is available now. Any of the names we would really want simply aren’t available at the moment.
People keep throwing his name out there, but Marquis simply isn’t a valuable trading chip. He is priced at or above (ok, above) market value. Now, there are teams who would be happy to take him (there are a number of contending teams that have gotten significantly worse production out of their fifth starters – look at the Mets, Twins, and Astros for example) if the Cubs ate a few million, but they certainly wouldn’t give you anything in return. I say it all the time here, but when something is priced at market value you don’t give anything up for it. You’re trading contracts not players.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 11:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't think it's pointless
things can ALWAYS happen and if the offense has to do this the rest of the season, we are doomed.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What can happen?
Honestly, what can happen right now? All the teams with the pieces we would want aren’t going to sell for another month at best.
Greinke and Cabrera would maybe be available but their price would be way out of whack with what they’re actually worth.
It’s definitely a point of weakness for us, and I personally think we should make a run at Sabathia when the time comes… but that time won’t come for another 2 months. In the meantime we just need to hope Hill can come back, Gallagher Lilly and Dempster can continue to pitch well, and Marquis starts to show some damn poise.
Then the very second he’s available you pay whatever the Indians want for Sabathia because we’ve never had a team with such a great shot at winning it all.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why?
we’re scoring the most runs in baseball. We have the best record. Why are we doomed with the staff we have?
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I DON'T FEEL CONFIDENT IN THIS STAFF PERIOD.
Why must you keep hearing this? It is my OPINION. I am nervous about the toll that the poor outings takes on an offense who needs to save something for the rest of the season. Done.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 5, 2008 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, ok
I’m sorry you don’t feel confident in the staff. I continue to not understand WHY, since we continue to have the best record in the league. I don’t think the offense is particularly overworked. It’s baseball.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 6, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess.
100 more games. You think this team will continue to come from behind for enough games (if necessary) to maintain? And..if so, will they be ready NOT to tank the way they did last year?
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 6, 2008 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question about Marquis' status
Let’s say the Cubs decide to bite the bullet and DFA him. And then say he ends up pitching with another team, Whoever picks him, just pays the prorated league minimum, right? And the Cubs are on the hook for rest of his salary for this year.
Now what about next year? I’m pretty sure Cubs are also on the hook for Marquis’ salary for next year too. Well, what about his services? Does he have to at least start with the Cubs next year in spring training and take it from there? Or by DFAing him this year, are the Cubs also cutting ties with him for next year as well (except for the $$).
I’m just wondering about this because it may get to a point this season where Marquis is taking up valuable space on the roster, esp. the rotation, so the Cubs will just let him go if they can’t trade him. But it’s not entirely out of the realm of possibility that somehow, somewhere, Marquis figures something out in the offseason and comes back next year as maybe a halfway decent pitcher. Seems to me that if the Cubs are paying his salary for next year, they ought to at least get first dibs on his services too…
Anyone know?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Jun 5, 2008 11:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If they dfa him and he leaves, he's gone
and the cubs continue to pay him.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well it would never happen
But yes if it did, happen, the Cubs would pay him for both years of the contract. For this year, he could sign for the pro-rated minimum. My understanding is that he would then be a free agent next year.
It would never happen because if the Cubs were willing to eat 1/3rd of the contract, someone would take him for free (i.e. trade for a b-level prospect). Just because we’re paying him too much doesn’t mean no one would take him, despite what certain shrill commentors might tell you.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who would want him at any price?
Not a contender that’s for damn sure. He doesn’t help your rotation and can’t pitch out of the bullpen. And he doesn’t even eat innings, so a team looking to insert him into a rotation for stability doesn’t have much need for him either.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
See my post above
The Twins, Mets, and Astros are all contenders who have gotten much worse production from their #5 starters. I’m sure there are many others if you just look around (it’s surprisingly hard to get a list of baseball’s 5th starters).
For as much maligned as he is, I’m sure if he were a free agent at the start of this season he’d have gotten a 2-year, $10-14M deal. Just like with Soriano, people here tend to confuse “overpriced” with “has no value.”
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he's got another year left on his contract
so any team picking him up would not only have him this year but next.
This is a guy with a horrible track record, who has been left off of two consecutive playoff rosters. Why would you trade for two years of him just to help out your 5th spot in the rotation…a spot you don’t even use in the playoffs?
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teams usually leave their 5th starters off the playoff roster...
You still have to win enough games to get to the playoffs! Believe it or not there are teams out there with 5th starters who are much worse than he is.
If the Cubs were willing to eat $5-8M, and didn’t want much of anything in return, a lot of teams – contenders even – would be happy to take him. Just ask the Mets if they’d rather have 2 years of Marquis for market value or if they’d rather keep trotting Mike Pelfrey out there.
However, it’s all academic because it will simply never happen. If we do trade him before his contract is up, it will be in the off-season this year.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zambrano is the only starter I feel good about come postseason play
Look at the teams who sliced thru the playoffs en route to the World Series the past number of years. Nearly all of them had a couple quintessential “power pitchers” in the mix.
Ryan Dempster and Ted Lilly are decent pitchers. Certainly they can help you win during the season. But come post-season? Guys like this typically get lit up like a Christmas tree.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 11:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So are you backing down from your assertion...
...that Ted Lilly is just as bad as Jason Marquis?
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ted Lilly is OK
He’s been pitching too much like Jason Marquis this season. That needs to change.
Look, Dempster and Lilly are decent starters. But in my view they aren’t going to be good enough come playoff time. A playoff team needs to have 3 starters it is highly confident in. Preferably you want at least 2 of those starters to be of the power pitcher variety. Sorry, but I’m not comfortable saying Dempster and Lilly are options B and C after Zambrano in a playoff rotation. If this team is to make a serious World Series run then the absolute imperative is to add a high quality starting pitcher to this mix.
Come playoff time Arizona has Webb, Haren, Owings and maybe the Big Unit. Los Angeles (who I think makes the playoffs somehow) has Penny, Billingsley, Lowe and maybe hotshot youngster Kershaw. Philadelphia (who I think will win the East) has Hamels and Myers.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right.
And I’m sure Hendry and Pinella are on top of it. This is the best chance the Cubs have had in my lifetime to go all the way and Hendry is going to do everything in his power to add another frontline starter. I still think that C.C. Sabathia might be available at the deadline. Cleveland doesn’t look like they’re going anywhere and he’s already tuned down something like a 120 million dollar deal. The big question is do we have the prospects to get the Indians to pull the trigger.
by bluekoolaide on Jun 5, 2008 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sabathia
I don’t see the Cubs in the bidding. One, I doubt we have the caliber of prospects that would entice Cleveland. Two, Sabathia may turn out to be a mega expensive two month rental. Three, Sabathia’s physical conditioning worries me. Not in the short-term but definitely in the long-term. He’s a big tuna is what he is.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indians don't want/need prospects
IF they trade CC – and as I’ve said many times here before; that’s a HUGE if – it’s going to be for a big bat and/or a closer. So the Cubs can put their prospects away or go dangle them somewhere else. If Hendry wants CC, he’s going to have offer the likes of Ramirez, Soto, or Marmol. And there’s no way Hendry does that – that would just be plain stupid.
Now if you’re still really lusting for CC, then let me plant a wild little seed in the back of your mind that you can go home tonight and burn a little incense at the foot of the Cubby Gnome and toss some salt over your shoulder… Might have to fill in around the edges with some other players or prospects and/or play with the dollars, but chew on this one for awhile…
Sabathia for Soriano.
Pretty wild, eh? I can come up with lots of reasons why it doesn’t make sense, but every now and then, something slips in there that makes me go whoa… this could work for both teams. It would certainly be a bold move – for both teams. I give it about a 0.5% chance of happening.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Jun 5, 2008 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd give it less than that.
The Tribe won’t take that contract, and the Cubs won’t eat it, because they’d then have to pay Sabathia.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I have to admit...
...now that I compare their numbers, Lilly and Marquis aren’t as far apart as I’d thought. In fact, Marquis has a lower ERA (5.02 to Lilly’s 5.23) and slightly higher ERA+ (88 to Lilly’s 85). He’s also given up 6 home runs to Ted’s 13 (ouch).
Then again, Lilly has started two more games (13 to Marquis’ 11) and pitched more innings (72.3 to Marquis’ 61). Ted also has far more strikeouts (69 to 34) and a better (though certainly not particularly good) WHIP (1.382 to 1.656).
All in all, I obviously can’t deny that Lilly has a lot of room for improvement. That bad start against Colorado now seems to loom more than ever as a major step back, though, by the same token, last night’s quality start shows hope is far from lost. I stick by my notion that he’s had enough good starts to offset the bad ones, and I’d still label him “inconsistent” rather than “bad.”
As far as getting a power pitcher for the playoffs, well, yeah. That would be great. But the options are so limited as to be virtually nonexistent at the moment.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hence...
Why the crumbling of Rich Hill hurts this team more than we currently recognize. I think Hendry and company were rightfully thinking that Hill could take the next step in his progression and be a capable power pitcher in tandem with Carlos Zambrano. But that hope has sorta exploded.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mmmm...ya had me then ya lost me.
Maybe this is semantics, but I don’t see how one could ever consider Rich Hill a “power pitcher.” Even at his best, Filthy Rich is a finesse lefty. I thought by “power pitcher” you were referring to a Roger Clemens (boo hiss!) type guy who could just blow hitters away.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curveball can be a high K pitch for Hill
His fastball sucks. That much I shall grant you. Hence why he is 28 years old and back toiling at Triple A. It’s bizarre to me that a promising pitcher like Hill who has known for at least 2 years that he needs another pitch still doesn’t have another pitch.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually Hill is in AA
because his mechanics are screwed up and he cant throw strieks. Has nothing to do with his fastball sucking.
Youre wrong and spouting garbage again. Same ole Same ole
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Jun 5, 2008 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, yeah, I never said (or meant to imply)...
...that Hill’s fastball sucks. I actually think he’s got a pretty good fastball when he spots it. My point was I don’t understand why you would think Hendry et al. were ever looking to Rich to be a “power pitcher.” I think they were looking to him to be a classic “crafty lefty” with a devastating curve ball. And I don’t think they were looking for him to be the No. 2 this season, either That’s Ted Lilly.
As far as Hill’s third pitch, my impression is he’s had a third pitch (a changeup) for some time. He knows it—he just can’t throw it with confidence. That’s probably one of the things he’s working on in Iowa.
Again, I’d really like read your definition of “power pitcher.” If you mean the Cubs need to get a “good pitcher,” well, yeah…and I need to some alone time with Eva Longoria.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should amend my definition of "power pitcher"
You are right. In pure form Rich Hill doens’t really qualify. I think of a power pitcher being Zambrano, Volzquez, Beckett, Sheets, etc.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, that makes sense...
...but it also leads back to the fact that there really aren’t any of those kinda guys available right now. And, as has been said ad infinitum, Rich Harden is too big of an injury risk. Why give away valuable prospects just to have Mark Prior redux sitting on the DL, leaving the team with the same pitching options they have right now?
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zambrano isn't really a power pitcher, either.
One of the best reasons for his success this year is the success of his sinker, and the groundball outs he is getting.
Who is leading the Cubs in strikeouts? Ted Lilly. Who is second? Ryan Dempster… Z is third, and with MORE innings than either Lilly or Dempster.
And to me, this is a GOOD thing.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I agree.
Big Z used to be a power pitcher, but, by his own admission, he’s moved away from that approach in favor of his sinker. Methinks this whole “power pitcher” obsession is just a wee bit out of control.
Nanika Ga Okoru!
Oh, and remember, folks: Alfonso Soriano is NOT batting leadoff. He's batting first.
by dat cubfan daver on Jun 5, 2008 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha---
Im not advocating for Maddux but didnt Maddux mention to Z that movement is better than velocity?
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip
by Hammer on Jun 5, 2008 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DINGDINGDING!
We have a winner.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jun 5, 2008 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Power pitcher?
We need a power pitcher?
"Let's not get too giggly." ~Lou Piniella
by JohnM on Jun 5, 2008 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, lord knows
Lou wants to find a rotation that a two-year-college player feels good about.
Sheesh.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about trying to point out where he's wrong.
Formerly Big Red (victim of the SBNation upgrade)
by Tackle Box on Jun 5, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have a big enough paintbrush.
"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08
by drewishdrewid on Jun 5, 2008 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagreed
Look at Dempster doing what he’s doing now and where he’s been. He’s clearly on the bounce back from major physical deficit, restretched out to start again and has done well. There’s no clear promise as to where he may be in two months, but while he’s not been overwhelming, he’s been pretty solid. Barring injury or a mental meltdown, I don’t see him getting “lit up” in the postseason.
Lilly’s more complicated. He flat out helped carry the team last fall and then sadly lost touch with everything in October. He’s not quite come back to form .. but he’s definitely got the horses to do so. He almost had the same deer in the headlights look the other night in the first inning. But he was a pro, settled down, did some adjustment and he kept us in the game. He did what he was asked to do.
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Jun 6, 2008 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good discussion Kinky
I’ve felt all along the staff isn’t in position to go deep in the playoffs. They’ll win the division, in fact I’m considering going beyond the 5-7 game margin mentioned before. LDS is a good chance, LCS is iffy and WS is risky at best.
I’d like to be a fly on the wall when Hendry discusses Greinke 3.56ERA, 5/2 K/BB, 1.25WHIP. BAA is OK at .258. What would KC want? Hmmmm….
Duchscherer from the A’s is intriguing. Injuries may be an issue but in his 9 starts he has an ERA of 2.32, BAA of .212, WHIP (my favorite pitching stat) of 1.03 with a K/BB ratio of 5/2. Would Beane try to ream Hendry on a trade here like we all thought he would for Harden or Blanton?
These guys wouldn’t cost a bundle like Sabathia; who I understand may be of interest by the BoSox. Tribe scouts are supposed to be watching the BoSox and their farm closely.
by blackhawk24 on Jun 5, 2008 8:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I suspect you have that backwards
Particularly with regards to Greinke. Greinke and Duke are under club control for a couple years each (Duke will be a free agent in 2010 and Greinke in 2011).
For CC, you just need to offer the Indians something better than what they’d get as a draft pick (and reportedly next year’s draft is weak). Where Greinke would probably take 3-4 top prospects, I suspect CC would only take 1-2 top prospects.
Duke is a lot harder to value; given Beane’s trading record though I can’t imagine he’d be cheap. I’ll concede the asking price could be at least similar to CC’s.
by Wreckard on Jun 5, 2008 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How's that backwards?
Greinke has decent numbers, the Royals suck, the Cubs have a need and resources to trade. Yes, the FA is 3 years off and that has value. I look at the guys numbers and they’re decent.
Dealing with Beane is always a gamble since he seems to get value in return. Duchscherer’s WHIP, BAA and K/BB is very good.
Sabathia would be the “sexy” acquisition but very costly.
by blackhawk24 on Jun 6, 2008 7:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Indians aren't going to let CC go
i dont think ..
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Jun 6, 2008 7:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure either, however
It’s June 6th, they could tank in the next 5-6 weeks and things could get interesting. But if they’re close and the crap continues to get deeper on the South side, they would be crazy to deal him.
by blackhawk24 on Jun 6, 2008 7:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm saying you have the asking price backwards
I think the asking price for Greinke and maybe even Duke is going to be higher than CC. You implied it was the other way around.
by Wreckard on Jun 6, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
Because its Beane they’d have to deal with, or just because CC is not doing so well this year.
by blackhawk24 on Jun 7, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Zach Grienke
His career has been a yo-yo ride to date. But there is no denying the quality of his arm. I’d imagine that Kansas City would would at least two blue chip prospects in return. But Grienke might form a nice one-two punch with Zambrano. A risky acquisition? Yes. But the opportunity to win a World Series probably won’t be as close as it is this year. If you are the Cubs then you have to pull out all the stops. Shoring up our suspect starting rotation is a priority.
Get Rich Harden !! 7 starts, 3-0, 41 IP, 49 Ks, 2.61 ERA
by MDBNIU on Jun 5, 2008 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
I had mentioned Grienke above. I have always thought he would be worth the risk. He has a nice arm and yes…some baggage to go with it. I think adding talent though, at this point, would be a plus for this staff.
Of course I want CC, just not sure if we can outbid other clubs with prospects. At least once July 31 arrives…if he is on the block of course.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 6, 2008 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This thread : One of the best of the year
Clearly, the Cubs of 2008 could well be a team of destiny … but the very heart of the issue that clouds this destiny has been well examined.
GREAT thread, Cub Nation .. we definitely are needing another starter and more longevity and consistency in the rotation as it stands. It’s early June .. and with the heat of a long summer coming in, perhaps the war horses will finally settle in and run like the dickens into history. But the misfiring continues – so may Lou and Hendry ever so carefully do what they gotta do to tune it out.
If it means a new set of plugs, module, wires, whatever .. what needs to be done has to be very careful, yet deliberately done in the month to come. If the Comeback Cub offence slips up at some point, that’s when the rotation has gotta shine and as good as it’s been in years, it just has got to be tighter. I think our long/short relief staff is probably the best in baseball, but it has been at times overworked.
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Jun 6, 2008 1:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
you summed up what I have been saying perfectly. I thought I did so originally but perhaps not.
When the comebacks taper off (and thay have to taper off in such a long season), the pitching has to return the favor. We need to have quality starts up our sleeve and i am not sure that we do at this point outide of Z and Dempster.
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 6, 2008 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone think
the Rockies will deal Aaron Cook? No idea the specifics of his contract but they are really bad this season and perhaps want to deal for younger players?
How does that make you feel?
by Kinky Reggae on Jun 6, 2008 8:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















