Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Iron Bowl Thoughts... Right Now

Rich Hill May Be Done.

Looks like the Cubs have run out of answers.

Star-divide

Pitching against rookie leaguers tonight in an Arizona League game, Hill lasted only one-third of an inning, allowing five runs on one hit with three walks and a hit batter. We all know Hill had been sent to Arizona to work on his control after losing command with the Cubs and at Triple-A Iowa. Apparently, that hasn't helped. Now, the Cubs are on the verge of shutting him down altogether so he can try to get his head on straight. And to think, we had such high hopes for him after last year. Hope he figures it out. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/cs-080701-rich-hill-chicago-cubs,0,637181.story

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs  |  Comment 128 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

wow

does anyone else think that maybe this wouldnt have happened if they didnt send him down at all?

by Glacier on Jul 2, 2008 1:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No.

This was a problem in the spring and has just gotten worse. I don’t want him going all Ankiel at the big league level.

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this -Oysterband

by Ross on Jul 2, 2008 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking this too

but there is a difference. Ankiel doesn’t swing the bat like a 10 yr old girl. Hill is a pitcher alone, so this is bad news for his career if he can’t get his sh*t together.

Geovany Soto you're my Hero

by love the ivy on Jul 2, 2008 3:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Must we

Continue to make Ankiel references regarding Rich Hill? I mean c’mon there is no comparison, Ankiel had 3-4 seasons of horrible minor league performances. Does Rich Hill have a case of Steve Blass, maybe. From an interview with Vine Line, Pinella further expounded on Hill’s seemingly inability to allow bad performances on the mound to be forgotten. He puts unecessary pressure on himself and digs the hole deeper. You can make your Blass, and Sax references, but until Hill performs at his current for more than one season in the Minors and then radically transforms himself into an outfielder…can we drop the Ankiel references…please?

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Ankiel references

aren’t about transforming into an outfielder, but about sudden and extreme loss of pitching control

"There are no curses here...Games are won and lost on the baseball field" - Lou Piniella

by El Borto on Jul 2, 2008 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm

I must not speak very good english, because my point really had nothing to do with him transforming into an outfielder…oh wait I take that back…it did but with a very thick layer of sarcasm. My point is and was, that its unfair to make a comparison to Ankiel because Hill hot not struggled at the minor league level to the same degree as did Ankiel (3-4 seasons). He was pretty effective last season and in the tail end of the previous season. Its unfair at this point in time to be making these references…if anything he might be Rob Bell circa 2005.

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Grrr

I admit it, my english sucks ——- hot = has

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was only speaking of his in ability to throw strikes

I have no recollection of Steve Blass (I am only 39!) and Steve Sax was an infielder. So when I refer to Ankiel, I am referring to the late pitcher, not the above average outfielder.

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this -Oysterband

by Ross on Jul 2, 2008 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Understood

My comment was made because enough (over the course of this season) Hill/Ankiel comparisons have been made to fill a volume set of encyclopedias. I also have no recollection of Blass, only stories told from my pop and grandpop and stuff I have read. I’m 27.

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It happened, early and often

He was all over the place in ST. There’s something in the mechanics that hasn’t been solved yet. I’m hoping he’s not a hot head and is willing to listen. Time off is best for him now, and if that means the rest of the season, so be it.

He’s so far removed from Clark and Addison, it doesn’t matter now at this point.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Jul 2, 2008 6:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you

He had a bad ST, I cringed everytime I saw him pitch. And as much as this has been tossed onto being a mental thing, it could also be a real struggle with the physical part of his game. We know in the past he has had some difficulty adjusting his arm movement. I like to think he is not a hot head, but he also may not allow himself to listen. I’m with Al, you, and others on this, it may be time for him to take a break from the season, regroup, get in great shape over the off season, and come back to ST with his head together. Hopefully the mechanics will follow.

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't cure

Steve Blass disease by keeping someone in the rotation, you only screw them up more and lose games that way.

Baseball is too much of a sport to be a business and too much of a business to be a sport.
William Wrigley Jr

by bubbamike the one and only on Jul 2, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't cure

Steve Blass disease by keeping someone in the rotation, you only screw them up more and lose games that way.

Baseball is too much of a sport to be a business and too much of a business to be a sport.
William Wrigley Jr

by bubbamike the one and only on Jul 2, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting theory

he was 1-0 with an ERA/WHIP around historical averages at the time of the send down. But Ross is right, his control’s been garbage since spring. The difference between 2008 Rich Hill and 2008 Barry Zito is about $120 million.

Now, if Hill can get on the HGH and start cranking home runs, then I’m all for him going Ankiel. ;)

WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll

by Gibbon Jockey on Jul 2, 2008 1:38 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Larry and Lou..

This is an example of why when things are going very good for a pitcher, you don’t change his friggin mechanincs.

Devin Hester, you are rediculous! -Jeff Joniak

by ARAM FOR MVP on Jul 2, 2008 1:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that's fair to LouPa

as he had to make a decision pretty early about a pitcher who’d shown terribly in spring training – as well as May of ‘08. The franchise has been building the past few years looking to be World Series competitive and to keep Hill around, this year especially, just wasn’t in the cards.

Now, as to Larry Rothschild – the guy is an absolute butcher who doesn’t know shit about managing pitchers. He very well might understand what a good pitcher looks like and knows a bunch of people in the business so he can remain employed, but Larry is just bad at his day to day job.

Knowing Marmol is going through growing pains as a lights out pitcher in the hands of Larry Rothschild is a frightening thought. The majors are full of snake-oil salesmen posing as pitching coaches, owning their positions only for having seen a major league manager naked in a shower somewhere, but I will say that Dave Duncan is an absolute genius and whatever he does/sees/knows is a tremendous asset. We all like to bitch and moan, ‘Oh, why didn’t Wellenmeyer throw like this for us’--well, look at the common denominator. Larry Rothschild vs. Dave Duncan. It isn’t even close.

WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll

by Gibbon Jockey on Jul 2, 2008 3:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The media loves to tell us how great

Rotschild is, but I have the same disagreement with that as you. Where is his miracle to validate making him a saint? The current list of prospects turned DL members for life is growing by the minute. Oh well, not like there’s gonna be a change any time soon. I hope Hill can either turn things around quick, or that some other team out there sees this as a “change of scenery” opportunity. He’s not getting any younger either.

Go ahead, Z me.

by tony412 on Jul 2, 2008 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I note that the DL stints of Cub pitchers...

... have pretty much vanished since Lou took over.

So who’s responsible? Rothschild or Dusty Baker?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm....

You’re aware the Cubs currently have 3 pitchers on the DL, right?

Z, Eyre, and Fox. Of course Z is coming back Friday, but I don’t think it’s right to say the DL stints for pitchers have vanished.

"I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." - Joe Morgan, Sunday Night Baseball 8-12-07

by gary varsho on Jul 2, 2008 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does Fox really count?

"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08

by drewishdrewid on Jul 2, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, now. Let's not get political.

They’re just as fair and balanced as any other network.

Oh, wait. You probably mean the oft-injured relief pitcher. Nevermind.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ar ar ar

I keep wondering when he’s going to get released. I mean, honestly…

"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08

by drewishdrewid on Jul 2, 2008 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

It reallys seems like his roster spot could be put to better use.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If nothing else, put him on the 60-day DL...

... to open up a 40-man roster spot.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We have Adam Harben on the 40-man roster.

Harben has all of Hill’s command problems and none of Hill’s track record of success at the majors.

If we want to outright someone off the 40 man, a guy that will clear waivers like Chad Fox, or Adam Harben, or Jake Fox would be appropriate. Someone would take a chance on Hill. And it’s not like we need the roster spot right this instant. If something comes up, then it becomes an issue.

by cwyers on Jul 2, 2008 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True.

Still, there’s room on the 40-man for, say, someone like Josh Kroeger, who we could actually use right now.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to see this move made.

"I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." - Joe Morgan, Sunday Night Baseball 8-12-07

by gary varsho on Jul 2, 2008 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was just gonna say

Fox pretty much started on the DL given his situation.

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sigh.

I meant the long-term Former Employee kind of DL stint.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh,

the Chris Carpenter/Mark Mulder kind? j/k

by N Oakley on Jul 2, 2008 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Yeah, THAT kind.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lou at least knows

if a starter throws 120 pitches that the next couple of times out he is giong to back them way down. That’s the difference I see in Lou and Dusty.

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Jul 2, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty..

killed young arms. I’m with you Al. Sure Rothschild isn’t the same type of guy as Duncan but he isn’t a bad pitching coach either. We’ve had success with him there.

"Go Cubs Go"

by mkcubs21 on Jul 2, 2008 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

with whom?

Who has gone from nothing to something under Uselesschild?

He is an ass and should not be managing our pitchers.

"I love this world. I hope hell is as much fun!"

by HIGGY on Jul 2, 2008 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is this a new sentiment?

I think I would have noticed if you said it before on here, Higgy. You are in a good position to know. I’m seriously interested to know more.

What is the problem with Rothschild? Lack of communication? Favoring certain pitchers? No preparation? Not taking responsibility for his decisions?

Not asking for names and stories, just general impressions.

Fontenot (fon-te-no): Cajun for "scrappy"

by zambranofan on Jul 2, 2008 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would go as far

as to say that Little League, High School, and College Pitchers (when applicable) have as much to do with this as anyone. Too many times you see someone over-used when they’re a bonafide stud.

Its funny, you spend most of your life gripping a baseball. And in the end, its almost always the other way around.

by TCobb1911 on Jul 2, 2008 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Get back.

That’s really too bad. Hopefully he’ll get whatever is wrong straightened out and get back to pitching again at the ML level.

Best wishes to you, Rich Hill!

by DrCrawdad on Jul 2, 2008 2:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the cubs should just put him in Center Field

A ugly win is better than a pretty loss-Lou

by NIUcubbie on Jul 2, 2008 3:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This is clearly a case of Steve Blass Disease.

If you haven’t seen my other posts on this topic, or don’t know who Blass was, take a look at his career numbers. Blass was a World Series hero (1971) who had been a solid starter for several seasons. The year after the WS, 1972, he won 19 games and finished 2nd in Cy Young voting.

The following season he almost literally could not throw a strike. 84 walks and 27 strikeouts in 88 innings with an ERA of almost 10. (No, those numbers are not a misprint. What’s amazing is that the Pirates, who won the NL East, stuck with him that long.)

There was nothing physically wrong with Blass - no injury of any kind. It was all in his head. I saw the last game he pitched - against the Cubs on April 17, 1974. He threw five innings and walked seven and threw a wild pitch and again, almost literally could not throw a strike. It was really sad.

I am not a psychologist, obviously, and can’t make a diagnosis. But it appears Rich Hill, who has a reputation for “overthinking”, has succumbed to this. It’s nearly impossible to fix, because baseball people look to fix physical or mechanical problems, not things like this.

The best thing they could do for Rich Hill is shut him down from pitching the rest of the year and have him see a sports psychologist, and maybe he can report to spring training in 2009 ready to go.

It’s really sad.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 3:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't go this far,

Rich Hill has always had some mental weakness – and I feel he’s always been over rated. He has moments where he can be lights out, and then he has his moments where you don’t even know what you’re gonna get from him. He was good at the end of 2006, and the beginning of 2007, but other than that, he was a mediocre pitcher other than that.

I’m kind of glad we have Sean Gallagher in the rotation instead. He’s 6 years younger, and I feel that he will be a better pitcher than Hill would of been. I’ve always thought Rich was a tad over rated.

My new life, my new world, and my beautiful daughter:
Tamia London Davis: Due date (8-11-08)!

by Unique on Jul 2, 2008 4:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overratedness and Doneness

I’m sure Hill was overrated in some circles, but “mediocre” is going too far in the other direction. Hill was #34 in pitcher VORP last year.

As for being done, (responding to the original post title), he may be done. He may not be. The one thing that gives me hope is that Hill has had some of these problems (not as extreme) before and was able to right the ship.

by DGU on Jul 2, 2008 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's his status

if he is “shut down” for the rest of the season, or for two months or whatever? He was demoted from the major league club to triple A. Then he was on the minor league DL, came back from the DL, then demoted to rookie league. He is still on the 40-man. So if he is “shut down”, does that involve putting him on the DL? Leaving him on the rookie league roster but not playing him? I assume he keeps his spot on the 40-man unless the Cubs have given up on him COMPLETELY, which doesn’t yet seem to be the case. And I assume he still gets paid….

''Listen, losing Soriano is no box of chocolates.'' ~Lou Piniella

by JohnM on Jul 2, 2008 6:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I certainly hope this isn't the case with Hill

There’s a bug in his head that requires an exorcist or an IT expert, can’t tell. But when I saw him in ST he was just all over the place.

Shut him down and see if a month or two away from everything would help.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Jul 2, 2008 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Avery was injured, though, wasn't he?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mark Wohlers

Another pitcher on the Braves at the same time as Avery, who had control issues and saw a sports psychologist.

Eat More Katsui

by CaliCub on Jul 2, 2008 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wohlers is a better comp for Hill...

... he had some success and then lost the ability to throw strikes, seemingly overnight, with no physical reasons.

His career ended suddenly.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Give him the BLUE pill....

He’ll forget everything

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Jul 2, 2008 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember reading about John Smoltz

seeing a sports psychologist early in his career. it wasn’t as common back then, and there was much ridicule, and plenty of articles about him being a headcase, mentally weak, etc. Obviously, he always had the physical gifts, and just needed some of the right kind of coaching- the kind you probably don’t find a lot of in a major or minor league clubhouse.

"Enough foreplay- let's get crackin'"- Fred Garvin

by davidalanu on Jul 2, 2008 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blaming Rothschild.....

..... is to admit one doesn’t know enough about Rich Hill. I don’t think anyone will claim Rothschild is the second coming of Leo Mazzone (and even he got dumped in Baltimore, so sometimes all the coaching in the world won’t help), but there’s a reason it took Hill as long as it did to reach the majors. I watched this kid for years at Spring training, and as Al said, he’s not very receptive to coaching. Whether that’s overthinking on Hill’s part, or he’s listening to someone else (like Mark Prior with his dad and Tom House), he’s had this block every time he got to the MLB level. He fell in love with that curveball early on, and once the league knew to wait for it, he would just nibble, nibble, nibble. He’s never learned to trust his other stuff and to pitch to contact. Hence, many strikeouts, but even then, after the middle of last year and especially this year, it was as if it was against his religion to throw a strike. Morever, Rothschild isn’t anywhere near him right now and he’s done nothing but regress.

What’s happened is a shame, because talented left handers can make a fortune in baseball. Hill’s one of those guys, he just refuses to accept that, it seems. That, and trusting the eight other guys on the field. At the end of the day, he’s got no one to blame but himself.

Santo Forever!

by BeerCub on Jul 2, 2008 7:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I apologize

I got his autograph at this year’s convention. I guess you could say I put the jinx on him. As with most of the active players I have gotten at the convention, he took a turn for a worse that very next season. Similar occurences have occurred this year with Pie, Howry, previous year it was Barrett, Before that it was CPat, before that it was Borowski (sp).

So far the only active guys to buck that trend are DLee and Dempster.

I guess you could say I am the cooler when it comes to our border line talent….

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey

by TheRiot Police on Jul 2, 2008 8:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Could you go get the autographs of a few of the Cardinals?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My curse

The curse I put on players is when I create a character in my writing and name him after a Cubs player. In February a character named Felix Hill was created. (I take one guys first name and another guys last name).

Next story will feature Cardinals galore! Albert Ankiel anyone?

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could you

be more wierd?

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Jul 2, 2008 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well..

My career Record at Busch is 1-20. So, after trying one more time this year (a 5-3 lost at the hands of the Todd Father) I have swore that off as well. Even if offered free tickets, I am not going.

Hopefully that bring us some luck this weekend.

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey

by TheRiot Police on Jul 2, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Head up to Milwaukee as well!

We could all chip in and buy you some Brewers gear, so you can go in undercover.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only other solution

What about sending him down to single A like they did with Willis. One of two things can happen from that:

-He can build his confidence by getting these guys out.
-He needs to be shut down because he can’t get the job done down there.

It’s a shame, such high hopes, a true fan favorite in the last couple years…best of luck to him.

by ak123 on Jul 2, 2008 8:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They already tried this by...

... having him pitch a game in the rookie league in Mesa. Didn’t help.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How long though?

Wasn’t it just one start down there though Al? Maybe he needs a few weeks down there.

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TRADE HIM!!!!!!

Kidding. Someone might take him as a throw in project though. He is of absolutley no value now. What an absolute shame!

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 9:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How about

Letting him pitch?

Pitching him every 9-10 days and moving him around so much probbaly isn’t helping him either. Let him take the ball every 5 days and figure it out, monster ERA or not. We already know he can pitch in the big leagues, he just has to start throwing strikes again.

Remember, in 2005 / early 2006 Rich Hill was terrible at throwing strikes (though not so awful as he seems to be now). After going to the minors after the Pierzynski game, when he came back again late in the year he was suddenly throwing strikes. Here’s hoping he re-figures out whatever he figured out in 2006.

Zambrano viciously attacked a pair of watercoolers for the crime of being within his line of vision. It was a classic battle of man versus inanimate object.

by berselius on Jul 2, 2008 9:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They tried letting him do that...

... by putting him in the rotation in Iowa. Didn’t help.

Remember, in 2005/early 2006 Hill was terrible at throwing strikes in the major leagues. When they sent him down he was dominant in Triple-A (leading me to say he was a AAAA pitcher). That didn’t happen this time—he went to Iowa and sucked, when he should have been dominating.

You say “he just has to start throwing strikes again”. Apparently, easier said than done.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just sayin'

Sometimes it takes a while to figure it out (if he ever will). From what I can tell from the I-Cubs website, he got 3 starts in a row after being sent down in may, then disappeared for awhile, then a few more starts in June…and now he’s been shipped off somewhere else. He might as well get his work in at AAA as anywhere. Just let him pitch.

Zambrano viciously attacked a pair of watercoolers for the crime of being within his line of vision. It was a classic battle of man versus inanimate object.

by berselius on Jul 2, 2008 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A while to figure it out?

We’re not talking about some 22-year-old kid here, we’re talking about a 28-year-old with a season and a half of success at the major league level.

They DID let him pitch. He failed.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. They've done all they can.

This is very, very sad, and the Cubs, understandably enough, are quickly running out of options. At this point, I would guess that he’ll be shut down for the rest of this season.

Maybe he just needs a good six to eight months away from baseball to really decide whether this sport is really his calling. Maybe he’s simply lost the passion to play and just can’t hide it – no matter how much money or what kind of commitment is on the table. In any case, I’m seriously bummed. I really liked Filthy Rich.

Oh, and here’s an easier to use link to that Trib article.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's take a step back here

Even Rick Ankiel spent a long time in the minors before finally giving up pitching. Let’s not write off Rich Hill yet.

Zambrano viciously attacked a pair of watercoolers for the crime of being within his line of vision. It was a classic battle of man versus inanimate object.

by berselius on Jul 2, 2008 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ankiel was between 22 and 24...

... before he gave up pitching.

Rich Hill is older than C. C. Sabathia, to use a comparison that might be pertinent.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Age isn't the pertinent issue...

As pitchers figure it out at different times (especially LHP). Ankiel was essentially a child prodigy (as was Sabathia). Most pitchers don’t follow that career path to the majors.

Berselius was simply saying that Hill has lost the plate for half a season. Ankiel lost it for YEARS. There’s no point in simply giving up on him right now, especially considering he’s playing in Arizona and not costing the team a look at any other players.

Hopefully he gets whatever is wrong figured out.

by SouthernCub on Jul 2, 2008 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point was...

... that Ankiel was young enough to give it a shot for a few years, so age IS the relevant issue.

Hill is 28 - and apparently had established himself as a decent major league starter for a full season. He doesn’t have the luxury of time. If he shuts it down for the rest of this year - which seems the thing to do—he just may be done.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say he has the luxury of time...

because giving up on him is pointless, for the reasons you’ve stated.

If shutting him down for the rest of the year means his career is over, why on earth would shutting him down be a good idea? That makes absolutely no sense to me.

by SouthernCub on Jul 2, 2008 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why shut him down?

It’s not like he’s injured. The only way to find the strike zone again is to PITCH. He can still see sports psychologists or whatever, but he can’t solely think his way back into the strike zone

Zambrano viciously attacked a pair of watercoolers for the crime of being within his line of vision. It was a classic battle of man versus inanimate object.

by berselius on Jul 2, 2008 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dat

6 to 8 months away may not be a bad idea.

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone remember

when Hill was untouchable?

MAN that kills me. Considering the limited success he has actuallyhad. Between him and Pie, I am starting to think that “potential” is a cruel joke that God plays on the game of baseball for perhaps distracting the world from some of his/her greater creations.

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's the Dontrelle Effect

No Cub GM wanted to be the next guy to give up Dontrelle…

Forgetting where Dontrelle is now. Forgetting that Clement and Alfonseca were keys to a 2003 NLCS run.

People just remember that the Cubs gave up Dontrelle.

No one should be untouchable. It’s that simple. Boston traded Bagwell. Detroit traded Smoltz. It happens.

At one point, Bobby Hill was untouchable too. And letting him be touched got us the best Cub 3B since Santo. There is a lesson there.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and remember, half of them are stupider than that!

by DaBard on Jul 2, 2008 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But what kills me is that

he aint goin anywhere now. The Cubs unfortunately have missed their opportunity to get rid of him for something. I don’t know how he could be worked into a trade at this point. Maybe the Yankees want to take on this project and see if a change of scenery will help Hill become their answer to Wang’s injury?

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Bagwell and Smoltz deals were stupid.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absoutely they were stupid

But given the information the GMs had at the time, they probably seemed like good moves.

When you are a contender, you have to give up on prospects to get established players. It’s that simple.

You can’t worry about untouchable. We’ve been burned too many times by untouchable players.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and remember, half of them are stupider than that!

by DaBard on Jul 2, 2008 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Tigers Fan's Perspective

In 1987 the Tigers were battling the Blue Jays for the AL East, but they still needed one more veteran hurler to put them over. They were in “win now” mode with an older, veteran club. Like everyone else I wish they had kept the then-unknown John Smoltz, but the pitcher they got for him (Doyle Alexander) went 9-0 for Detroit with a 1.53 ERA. Although the Tigers lost to a hot Twins team in the ALCS, and although Alexander was done after 1988, I don’t fault Bill Lajoie for making that trade.

It’s only a crappy trade because Tom Monaghan (Tigers owner back then) took team money that should have been put towards scouting and development and used it to finance his other projects, including donations to convents and laying the groundwork for his Catholic-only “Ave Maria” community in Florida. If Monaghan doesn’t touch the team money and their system sustained the level it reached in the late 70s (Trammell, Whitaker, Parrish, Morris, Gibson), then losing Smoltz hurts less.

Eat More Katsui

by CaliCub on Jul 2, 2008 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Red Sox Got Lary Andersen

Okay, the Bagwell deal was bad for Boston, However, Lary Andersen did help the Red Sox win the 1990 AL East title. This was not an absolutely terrible deal because the Red Sox got the immediate help for which they were looking in Andersen. Of course, the Astros got Bagwell, who helped them for years.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jul 2, 2008 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Helped them do what exactly?

They went to a World Series 15 years after the trade and lost in four games.

They finished first four times 97, 98, 99 and 01 and lost in the first round all four times.

Meanwhile, the Red Sox have won two rings.

Obviously, Larry Anderson had nothing to do with that. But the point is, organizations recover.

At least the good ones do.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and remember, half of them are stupider than that!

by DaBard on Jul 2, 2008 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really?
....Alfonseca were keys to a 2003 NLCS run.

"That’s what I love about my skip, man. He’ll tell you that you suck...I know I suck. We know we suck...Yeah, we suck. But we’ll see who sucks at the end."
- Gary Sheffield

by DrGalazkiewicz on Jul 2, 2008 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, don't you remember

that big series against the Cardinals in September at Wrigley, when
he chest-bumped the umpire after that blown foul call down by the bullpen?
That was totally key, man. :)

"Whoo, boy! Next time around, bring me back my stomach!" -Jack Brickhouse

by Goodie1969 on Jul 2, 2008 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

why the hell did they mess with him in the first place?

if he was successfully last year why change his delivery just to hold on base runners. This is the nightmare of possibly ruining a pitcher’s career. But hopefully not, but the cubs management shoulda listen to the saying “don’t mess with something that works.”

by lexmarklover on Jul 2, 2008 9:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tricky Stuff

Changing the mechanics of a player’s swing or pitching motion is always a dicey proposition. I’ve chatted with a guy who has some MiLB connections, and the guy said that minor league managers and coaches will do all they can NOT to mess with a prospect…even if said prospect has a hitch in his delivery or a hole in his swing that can be exploited once they get to the majors.

According to my guy, MiLB managers/coaches operate under the edict that “you screw with a guy and you won’t see another opportunity to manage or coach ever again”. So it becomes sort of a CYA mentality amongst instructors, as they fear retribution if they try to improve a player and the player regresses a la Rich Hill.

This would also explain why many young players come to the big leagues without their game being completely refined (pitchers not holding runners close, batters lacking plate recognition, etc.).

Eat More Katsui

by CaliCub on Jul 2, 2008 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This just sucks altogether

And to think, a couple of years ago, Rich Hill was an “untouchable” in trade talks. Damn it.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Jul 2, 2008 10:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hill

This is going to sound awful but I think most of you will understand what I’m saying.

I almost wish they’d find something wrong that can be fixed with him physically. That is much easier to fix than if it’s a mental issue,

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 10:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think we all wish that.

But it doesn’t seem likely, because his velocity is still good. It’s just his inability to throw strikes.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 2, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In 1999

Yes velocity is good but if I remember correctly in 1999 spring training workouts Kerry was hitting the mid to upper 90s with his fastball but what was causing worries was he couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn, Then he got into a game threw a pitch about 20 feet over a batters head was taken off the field and had elbow surgery a week later.

I still remember that awful weather on that awful spring day and Dave Eanet breaking in on Kathy and Judy to announce Kerry had to have the surgery.

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 10:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Mark my words...

...Hill will be back.

Actually, that’s just hoping.

What doesn’t make sense to me is in amongst all his trouble, he actually had one pretty good start where he went 5IP and only gave up 1 BB. He threw 78 pitches and 47 were for strikes. I wasn’t there but I’m just wondering if he really is that far gone. I’d like to see him go back to AAA and stay there until something clicks. At this point with all the gloom and doom, what’s it gonna hurt?

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Jul 2, 2008 10:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if shifting him to the pen briefly in the minors...

JUST TO SEE if a new role allows him to think less and throw more. Just an idea…I know I may get flamed but hell, nothing else to do with the kid now.

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 10:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And I mean re-assign him with no goals or projects

just hand him a new role and see how he takes to it.

you can’t ruin his trade value any more right?

Calm down.

by Kinky Reggae on Jul 2, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's an interesting idea...

...and I would have to think the Cubs have at least considered it. I mean, if Hill is (as one beloved BCB poster has often written) a two-pitch pitcher, why not make him a LOOGY?

I guess the huge, glaring drawback to this idea is that, if Rich is prone to overthinking, sitting in the bullpen for five or six innings would give him an awful lot of time to, um, think.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops...

didn’t mean for that to all be in the title. I’m struggling this morning.

by SouthernCub on Jul 2, 2008 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was a post from northsider

That’s his style.

''Listen, losing Soriano is no box of chocolates.'' ~Lou Piniella

by JohnM on Jul 2, 2008 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, yes. I kinda figured there might be...

...some stuff like this in his background as well. And, of course, lack of control is pretty much the worst sin a reliever can commit. I can picture Lou seething in the dugout already.

Nanika Ga Okoru!

by dat cubfan daver on Jul 2, 2008 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure what the splits say

And why they say them. Whether it’s a pitching style thing, a “mental makeup” thing, or what, that might make him less effective with runners on base. But generally relievers strike out and walk more batters. Some of that is because of the type of pitchers that get sent to the pen, the different challenges of that role, and the adjustments they make to it. But it’s also generally true that with runners in scoring position and one or two outs in an inning, relative to each other, hits of all kinds (especially homers) become more valuable, walks less valuable, and strikeouts more devastating. Hill, as a high-strikeout, high-walk pitcher, might not be so badly suited to short relief work. Unfortunately he gives up lots of home runs, too. If he could bring sharp focus to short stints, leave fewer pitches up, and thus give up fewer home runs, that would obviously be ideal.

Also. Career major league numbers for Rich Hill (http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=hillri01&year=00):
With bases empty, opponents hit him .235, .317, .404
With runners on, they go .229, .310, .394
With RISP, .241, .318, .391

0 outs: .233, .314, .409
1 out: .242, .320, .413
2 outs: .222, .307, .377

At least in his Major League career situational differences within innings are basically non-existent.

by aldimond on Jul 2, 2008 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder when...

If it hasn’t already started, that the arm-chair psychologists that all evaluated Felix Pie, will begin strong efforts to diagnose Rich Hill’s mental issues. Seems like its been a little muted…not that I am complaining!

by StevenABQ on Jul 2, 2008 11:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Very sad.

I feel so bad for Rich. Best wishes Rich!!!

by sue369 on Jul 2, 2008 12:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hm...

A seasoned veteran starter is always fixable, probably mechanical. What he’s most likely doing is dropping his elbow below his shoulder causing fastball elevation and many hanging breaking balls.

Jim Edmonds has seriously become my favorite player. WHAT'S HAPPENING????

by Cub Style on Jul 2, 2008 2:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah, but

wouldn’t they have seen that by now if it was?

"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08

by drewishdrewid on Jul 2, 2008 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not about hanging breaking balls

it’s about a complete inability to throw strikes-not mechanical at this point but mental and that’s what makes it so tricky to deal with.

by bluekoolaide on Jul 2, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That comes from mechanics

If he lowers his elbow everything elevates and flattens out. A lot of the time what’s wrong mentally is effecting them mechanically.

Jim Edmonds has seriously become my favorite player. WHAT'S HAPPENING????

by Cub Style on Jul 2, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right now...

Jim Hendry needs to determine if he’ll consider keeping Hill within the organization in 2009. This is because Hill will not be of any use at the ML level for the remainder of this season so they need to determine if it’s worth setting up a long-term plan to try to rebuild him. If they don’t want to keep him around, then they can continue to tinker and yank him around while trying to deterimine if he has any trade value. At the end of the year, if Hill shows no progress and they can’t find a buyer, Jim Hendry can look Rich in the eye, shake his hand, and wish him good luck in finding a new organization. Or Hendry could do that any old time and free up Hill’s roster spot.

On the other hand, if the Cubs do decide to try to rebuild him, they need to set up a long-term plan immediately and then tell Hill exactly what the plan is for the remainder of this season.

There are two recent examples of pitchers that were initially successful in the majors, then completely lost it, but that eventually became quality starters – Roy Halladay and Zach Greinke. In each instance the organization set down and followed a long-term plan to help that pitcher slowly return to the majors. Greinke and Halladay had different problems and the two courses of action were different, so it’s not as if either of their cases can serve as a magic rosetta stone for Rich Hill. Still, it’s clear that constantly tinkering with a pitcher, moving him from level to level, and hoping that he suddenly regains form has not and almost certainly will not work.

So what would be a good long-term plan for Hill? Beats me. I like the idea of sticking him at level for the remainder of this season and letting him work pre-determined relief assignments. That’s not to say I favor converting him into a reliever but, rather, just letting him work an inning or two with greater frequency than he would as a starter. Put him in rookie ball or wherever and tell him he’s going to be pitching there for the rest of the year and if he shows no improvement then worst consequence is a few losses for the AZL Cubs.

Ultimately, I guess that I favor giving Hill time. While some other team might take a flyer on him, Hill just won’t fetch anything of value because his problems are so severe. Still, his past success coupled with his limited service time lead me to believe that it’s worth trying to fix him, even at the expense of a 40 man roster spot. I realize that Hill is 28 years old but that only means you lower your expectations for what he can still become – there’s a chance that he could still be a productive major league player even if he won’t be a candidate to win multiple Cy Youngs. Even if the odds are against a comeback, the outside chance to gain a cheap, league-average, lefty starter justifies using one roster spot…I can’t be optimistic but I don’t want the Cubs to give up.

We sell spatulas...and that's all.

by LaddieRenfroe on Jul 2, 2008 2:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess this is the major question -

Are Hill’s problems so “severe” that they can only be fixed by a “long-term plan”?

Is there anyway for us to really know what his problem is? The problem is clearly “severe” in the sense that he is worthless right now, this minute. But I’m not convinced, especially if the problem is mental, that he will be worthless in the next minute. If it’s not a physical problem, the kind of rehabilitation Hill needs could be momentary or it could take years. Without diagnosis, none of us know.

Anyway, knowing what I know, there’s no way I take him off our 40-man. He’s not making any money. It’s cheap and easy to keep him wherever and see what can be done. His potential is too high to just cut him loose.

by DGU on Jul 2, 2008 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

two things

1. Are Hill’s PITCHING problems so severe that the Cubs should consider a long-term plan? I say yes, the results tell us that. The man hasn’t had any control for four months now – not during the spring, not for a few outings in April, not in Iowa, and not in rookie ball. It’s not simply a case of a few bad outings and, given the time that’s past clearly not a mechanical flaw that can be easily corrected. The Cubs have spent a substantial portion of that time trying to fix him under the assumption that he could easily regain form. Meanwhile, Hill himself must know that he is/was expected to contribute to a contending team. If the Cubs decide to try to salvage Hill, they need to slow down and decide what they want from him in 2009 and 2010 because clearly there is no magic wand they can wave to fix him immediately.

2. You hit on key part of this by asking if there was any way for us to know what his problem is? No, there’s not, which makes this exercise frustrating as a fan. From what he’s done, I think we can safely say that the problem is severe in that he’s doing his job very badly. But it’s really hard to say what the details of a solution would be…few of us have actually seen him pitch in two months…and nobody knows what the details are if the root problem is a mental one. If it requires counseling, either from a sports psychologist or otherwise, the Cubs may as well remove the immediate pressure on Hill to perform and focus on having a contributing pitcher in 2009 and 2010.

We sell spatulas...and that's all.

by LaddieRenfroe on Jul 2, 2008 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If 2 is true, then how can 1 be known?

I agree with you completely on your second point. My question is – if we don’t know what the problem is, how can we know how long it will take to fix it.

Here’s the bigger worry, and one that seems likely – the Cubs may not know what the problem is or how even to begin trying to fix it.

On the other hand, if they don’t know and sometime in the next month figure it out, it is still possible that the cure will take 5 minutes. I’m not counting on that.

by DGU on Jul 2, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe it's time to teach him the knuckleball...

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jul 2, 2008 2:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

... sandwich

I bet that’ll straighten him out.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Jul 2, 2008 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

to the moon

Alice!

"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08

by drewishdrewid on Jul 2, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Smoltz

I had forgotten about Smoltz and his psychologist. Maybe this isn’t a bad idea. Heck the situation can’t get any worse. Call up Smoltz and get the guy’s name and take it from there.

Smoltz is not the first and will not be the last to see a psychologist in the world of sports. I think someone mentioned Grossman is seeing one this offseason on a Bears blog. (hopefully he can teach him navy blue and orange means Bears, Other colors not Bears)

Go Cubs

by cubstoseriesby100 on Jul 2, 2008 3:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Grossman is color-blind?

No WONDER! This makes so much more sense now!

"We expect to win. We go out to win. So we're just living up to our own expectations." Derrek Lee, 5/29/08

by drewishdrewid on Jul 2, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I see happening

is that he’s shut down for the rest of the year and starts to see a sports psychologist-he’ll probably then be invited to spring training next year and given what will probably amount to one last chance (that is, if Hill even WANTS to try again at that point). If he still shows an inability to throw strike, I think that’ll probably be it for his Cubs’ (and more than likely his baseball) career. A true shame. i really thought about a month into last season that he was on his way to stardom.

by bluekoolaide on Jul 2, 2008 3:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Can we still get Bedard for him?

Remember when many (including myself) were saying that the only way the Cubs should trade Hill and Pie was if they got Bedard and Roberts back? What a difference 3 months make.

Formerly NO100

by jerry morales rules on Jul 2, 2008 4:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Uhh....

Bedard is still a great pitcher you know. Hill must be rebuilt, he has no value as of now.

Jim Edmonds has seriously become my favorite player. WHAT'S HAPPENING????

by Cub Style on Jul 2, 2008 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rich Hill stunk since day one of spring training

Best strategy probably is to shut him down completely and let him do whatever it takes to regroup. Personal opinion is that the pressure of having a two pitch arsenal - a big curveball and a mediocre fastball - ate Hill alive. He knows if he can’t get the curveball over the plate then it’s curtains. The pressure of having to always get the curveball over the plate obviously has taken a big toll on his pysche.

Maybe his best strategy is to take a couple months off, then somehow figure out an effective third pitch that can lessen the relative importance of the curveball in his repetoire. Much easier said then done.

Pitching is KING. We don't add a frontline starting pitcher and a quality bullpen arm then this season will have yet another sad conclusion.

by MDBNIU on Jul 2, 2008 5:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

can’t believe that I’m agreeing with this…

shakes head in shame

by tootle on Jul 2, 2008 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah but...

.....Rich Hill is a “legitimate” #2 pitcher and an “ace” on many teams, right? Right Cryers? and the rest of you who spewed that drivel in the off-season.

Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen

by lemon20pie on Jul 2, 2008 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You predicted he would have a 4.25 ERA with 204 IP, not an ace but a well above-average starter.

To claim that you predicted a case of Steve Blass disease for Hill is utter bullshit.

by cwyers on Jul 2, 2008 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess its

a matter of philosophy, but I can’t see the value in shutting him down. He’s not hurt. And I think giving him all that time off will just give him more time to think about it. Not too mention, all the side sessions in the world won’t help him throw strikes in a game.

Its funny, you spend most of your life gripping a baseball. And in the end, its almost always the other way around.

by TCobb1911 on Jul 2, 2008 11:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hill has a future in tv

he’s really funny and given the “quality” of most of the analysts today, someone would pick him up quick.

by AlabamaCubFan on Jul 3, 2008 6:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Ask BCB - Wacky Trade Proposals
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1

Recent FanPosts

Goodhawkdawson_pic_small
Dawson '88
Self-portrait-4_small
Tell Me About Mr. Cub
Small
What to do with Marshall?
Small
Time to get yelled at...
Cubs_small
Cubs HR Over/Under
Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

OT: Andruw Jones a White Sox
How Kosuke Fukudome Spends His Offseason
Miguel Cabrera Available, which leads me to ask if Granderson really is available
Keith Moreland On How The Cubs Can Win It All
Marlins Considering Moving June Series Vs. Mets To Puerto Rico
Mike Kiley insults Wrigley and Cubs fans
Muskat on Fuld : even DUMBER than usual
Free Agency Blunders
"I Want Mark DeRosa"
White Sox Sign Vizquel To One-Year Deal

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman