Talking about possible playoff matchups...
Okay, I'm a little wary of invoking bad joo joo with this post, but I figured if I kept it to discussing the playoff matchups in the entirety of baseball it'd lessen the potency of any joo joo impact on the Cubbies...
Anyway, since about the All-Star break I've been doing informal calculations on playoff matchups. That is, I take a look at the possible playoff match-ups in both the AL and the NL to determine (based on previous series this year between teams) which teams would be most likely to advance if they faced each other. I do this partly because I get bored at work, and partly because I'm curious as to which composition of teams in the playoffs (across both leagues) would be most beneficial to the Cubbies... In this fanpost I've included 3 interesting scenarios for the playoffs. There are a lot of other scenarios that could be included, but 3 seemed like a good number to me.
If the season ended today:
Sox @ Rays
Red Sox @ Angels
Arizona @ Cubs
Brewers @ Mets
Are the division series matchups. The format for the division series is 2-2-1. With that in mind...
In the White Sox @ The Rays:
The first two games of the series would be played in Tampa, where the White Sox are 3-4. Because the record is nearly even, I'm splitting the first two games of the series.
The next two games would be played in Chicago, where the White Sox are 1-2. Again, because the teams are nearly even in record, I'm splitting the next two games. That means the final game would be played in Tampa Bay, and because the Rays have a better record overall vs the White Sox, they win the last game and advance to the ALCS.
In the Red Sox @ Angels series:
The first two games of the series are played in Los Angeles. In games played there, the Red Sox are 0-3 vs the Angels. Therefore, I give the first two games of the series to the Angels.
The next two games of the series are played in Boston. In Boston, the Red Sox are 1-5 vs. the Angels. Therefore, the Angels take the next game of the series and cleanly sweep the Red Sox and advance to the ALCS.
Over to the NLDS....
In the Diamondbacks @ Cubs series:
The first two games of the seris are played at Wrigley, where the Cubs are 3-0 vs the Diamondbacks. Therefore, the Cubs take the first two games of the series. The next two games of the series are played at Arionza where the Cubs are 1-2 vs the Diamondbacks. This means the next two games are split, which gives the Cubs a victory over the Diamondbacks in 4 games and they advance to the NLCS.
In the Brewers @ Mets series:
The first two games of the series are played in New York, where the Mets are 1-2 vs the Brewers. Therefore, the first two games of the series are split. The next two games are played in Milwaukee, and unfortunately we don't have much data to go on at the moment, so I'm just going to split the next two games. This sends the series to a fifth game, which the Brewers win based on overall record to advance to the NLCS.
Back to the AL for the ALCS...
LA Angels @ Tampa Bay Rays
Both the ALCS and the NLCS follow a 2-3-2 format.
The first two games of the series are played in Tampa Bay where the Angels are 1-5. Therefore, the first two games of the series go to Tampa Bay. The next three games are played in Los Angeles where the Angels are 2-1. Therefore, the Angels take two out of 3 at home which puts the series at 3 games for the Rays and 2 for the Angels and takes it to a sixth game. The sixth game would be played at Tampa Bay, and given the Angels abysmal record there, the Rays take the next game and win the ALCS to advance to the World Series (what a shocker!)...
To the NL for the NLCS...
Brewers @ Cubs
The first two games of the series are played at Wrigley. The Cubs are currently 2-4, which means that Milwaukee takes the first two games of the NLCS. The next three games are played in Milwaukee, where the Cubs are 4-0. Thus, the Cubs win the next three games of the NLCS. The next two games are played at Wrigley where the two teams split, which means the Cubs win the NLCS in 7 games and advance to the World Series (yeeey!).
To the World Series...
Cubs @ Rays
The AL has home field advantage from the All Star game, and the series follows the 2-3-2 format.
The first two games are played in Tampa Bay where the Cubs are 0-3. The first two games therefore go to Tampa Bay. The next three games are played in Wrigley. At this point, we have no data, but because the Cubs play so well at home, we give them the next three games. The series then moves back to Tampa, where Tampa Bay wins the sixth game. During the seventh and final game... well, let's just say to avoid the bad joo joo I'm going to let y'all make up your own conclusions on this one. ;)
Now for the second of our three scenarios...
If the teams currently in 2nd in the AL East, AL Central, NL East, and NL West end up in first.
This scenario is pretty much what it sounds like. I took the two divisions in each league that are the most contested (which leaves out the AL West and the NL Central) and flipped the first and second place teams. To determine the wild card in this scenario, I made the assumption that the teams in question would continue playing pretty much as they have - that is, even if Boston wins the AL East, because both Tampa Bay and Boston have been playing better than either the Twins or the White Sox, the wild card in the AL still comes from that division. The wild card in the NL is unchanged because all the contending teams in the NL East and NL West have worse records than both the Cubs and the Brewers.
In this scenario:
Boston wins the AL East, Minnesota wins the AL Central, and the Angels win the AL West. Tampa Bay is the AL Wild card. Philly wins the NL East, the Cubs win the NL Central, and the Dodgers win the NL West. Milwaukee is the NL Wild card.
Rays @ Angels
Twins @ Boston
Dodgers @ Cubs
Brewers @ Phillies
For the ALDS...
Rays @ Angels
The first two games of the series are played in LA. The Angels are 2-1 at home vs the Rays. The first two games of the series split. The next two games are played in Tampa Bay, where the Angels have an abysmal 1-5 record. The next two games therefore go to Tampa Bay, and the Rays advance to the ALCS.
Twins @ Boston
The first two games of the series are played in Boston, where the Red Sox are 3-0. The first two games of the series go to Boston. The next two games of the series are played in Minnesota, where the Red Sox are 1-3. The next two games therefore go to Minnesota. The fifth game of the series goes back to Boston, where the Red Sox win based on record to advance to the ALCS.
For the NLDS...
Dodgers @ Cubs
The first two games of the series are played at Wrigley, where the Cubs are 3-0 vs the Dodgers. The Cubs win the first two games. The next two games of the series are played in LA, where the Cubs are 2-2. The next two games are therefore split, which gives the Cubs a win over the Dodgers in 4 games to advance to the NLCS.
Brewers @ Phillies
The first two games are in Philly, where we don't yet have data. Philly has a marginally better home record than the Brewers' road record, so we split the first two games of the series. The next two are played in Milwaukee, where Philly is 1-1. Again, we split the two games. The crucial fifth game is played back in Philly, where based on the slightly better Phills home record, they take it to move to the NLCS.
Back to the AL for the ALCS...
Rays @ Boston
Again, the ALCS follows the 2-3-2 format.
The first two games of the series are played in Boston, where the Red Sox are 6-0 vs the Rays. They win the first two games. The next three games are played in Tampa Bay, where the Red Sox are 0-6 vs the Rays (odd, isn't it?). The Rays take the next three games of the series. The final two games of the series are played in Boston, where the Red Sox win in 7 games based on record to advance to the World Series.
Over to the NL for the NLCS...
Phillies @ Cubs
The NLCS also follows the 2-3-2 format.
The first two games of the series are played at Wrigley, where the Cubs are 2-2. The first two games of the series are therefore split. The next three games of the series are played in Philidelphia, where the Cubs are 1-2. Therefore, the Cubs win one game and the Phillies win two games. The next two games are back in Wrigley. Based on the Cubs far superior home record vs. the Phil's road record, the Cubs take the next two games to win the series and move on to the World Series.
World Series
The AL has home field advantage from the All Star game, and it follows a 2-3-2 format.
Cubs @ Boston (exciting!)
The first two games of the series are played in Boston. We have no data for the two teams, so I'm going solely based on home records vs. road records for the two teams. Boston has a better home record than the Cubs have a road record (Boston is nearly as good as the Cubs at home, while the Cubs are only a few games over .500 on the road) so I'm giving the first two games to Boston. The next three games are played at Wrigley. The Cubs are fantastic at home, while Boston is below .500. Based on this, the Cubs take the next three games. The last two games are played in Boston. Based on records, Boston evens up the series in the sixth game. The seventh and final game is played in Boston where... again, to avoid the bad joo joo, I'm going to let you make your own conclusions.
And now on to our third and final scenario...
If the teams I dislike the most miss the playoffs
As a Cubs fan, there are certain teams that I have a personal dislike for. These include (in no particular order) the Brewers, the Cardinals, the White Sox, the Diamondbacks, and the Marlins. This scenario is therefore based on a situation in which none of these teams are in the playoffs. Based on this and current standings...
Tampa Bay wins the AL East, Minnesota wins the AL Central, the Angels win the AL West. Boston is the AL Wild card. The Mets win the NL East, the Cubs win the NL Central, and the Dodgers win the NL West. Philly is the NL Wild card.
Twins @ Rays
Red Sox @ Angels
Philly @ Cubs
Dodgers @ Mets
For the ALDS...
Twins @ Rays
The first two games are played in Tampa Bay. As of right now, the Twins have not played the Rays in Tampa Bay. But, based on record, we know that the Rays are ridiculously good at home, and the Twins are below .500. Therefore, the Rays take the first two games of the series. The next two games of the series are played in Minnesota, where the Twins are 1-1. The Twins therefore win the 3rd game but lose the 4th, which sends the Rays to the ALCS.
Red Sox @ Angels
The first two games of the series are played in Los Angeles. In games played there, the Red Sox are 0-3 vs the Angels. Therefore, I give the first two games of the series to the Angels.
The next two games of the series are played in Boston. In Boston, the Red Sox are 1-5 vs. the Angels. Therefore, the Angels take the next game of the series and cleanly sweep the Red Sox and advance to the ALCS.
For the NLDS...
Philly @ Cubs
The first two games of the series are played in Wrigley, where the Cubs are 2-2. The first two games are therefore split. The next two games are played in Philly, where the Cubs are 1-2. I'll give the next two games to Philly. The fifth and crucial game in the series is played in Wrigley, where, due to the Cubs superior home record, the Cubs win to advance to the NLCS.
Dodgers @ Mets
The first two games of the series are played in New York, where the Dodgers are 1-2. Based on the closeness of the record, I'm splitting the first two games. The next two games are played in LA, where the Dodgers are 2-1. Again, based on the closeness of the record I'm splitting the games. The fifth and crucial game is back in New York, where the Mets win to advance to the NLCS.
Back to the AL for the ALCS...
Red Sox @ Rays
The ALCS follows a 2-3-2 format.
The first two games are played in Tampa Bay, where the Red Sox are 0-6. The Rays therefore take the first two games. The next three games are played in Boston, where the Red Sox are 6-0. The Red Sox therefore take the next three games. The last two games are back in Tampa, where, based on superior record, the Rays take the last two games to win the series and advance to the World Series.
Back to the NL for the NLCS...
Mets @ Cubs
The NLCS also follows the 2-3-2 format.
The first two games are at Wrigley, where the Cubs are 2-0 vs. the Mets. The Cubs take the first two games. The next 3 games are in New York. We don't have any data for the Cubs in New York yet, but the Cubs are only a few games over .500 on the road, while New York is 41-25 at home. Based on that, we give the next two games to the Mets, with the last game going to the Cubs. The last two games are back in Wrigley. The Cubs crush the Mets in the sixth game to win the NLCS and advance to the World Series.
World Series
The AL Has home field advantage in the World Series, and it follows a 2-3-2 format.
Cubs @ Rays (haven't we seen this before?)
The first two games are played in Tampa Bay where the Cubs are 0-3. The first two games therefore go to Tampa Bay. The next three games are played in Wrigley. At this point, we have no data, but because the Cubs play so well at home, we give them the next three games. The series then moves back to Tampa, where Tampa Bay wins the sixth game. During the seventh and final game... a meteor strikes the stadium prior to the start of the game (nobody is hurt) but the series is postponed indefinitely while the population of the Earth attempts to fight off the invading Zerglocks of planet Alpha Centaris 11. ;)
So... which playoff scenario would you like to see the Cubs in? Do you have any other wacky configurations for the playoffs? And if we get invaded by scary aliens, will we all die horrible horrible deaths, or win like in Independence Day?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, editor-in-chief (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
46
comments
Comments
That was painfully long so in short....
no. Not with an anemic offense like this one.
Kwa...Ki...Sur...Pee...Nee...Ku?
by Kinky Reggae on Sep 1, 2008 4:51 PM CDT 0 recs
anemic offense?? Cubs??!?!!!
Cubs are 1st in NL in runs scored, avg., slg., obp, etc. etc. etc.
the pink hat guy is my father
by joeschmitt on
Sep 1, 2008 6:20 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Please use the Intro Paragraph and Entire Body (Continue Reading)
when making a post this long
BTW WAY TOOOOOO EARLY for this….think Sept 28th
Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."
by Ivy Walls on
Sep 2, 2008 12:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Pretty potent offense the past few games huh?
That was my point Joey.
Kwa...Ki...Sur...Pee...Nee...Ku?
by Kinky Reggae on
Sep 2, 2008 3:40 PM CDT
up
0 recs
NO!!
Every heard of the saying, “don’t put the cart before the horse”?
This is the perfect example.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Sep 1, 2008 5:06 PM CDT 0 recs
I'm okay with discussing potential FIRST-ROUND matchups...
…but let’s not get ahead of ourselves with LCS and WS discussion.
"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman
by hip2bsquare on Sep 1, 2008 5:11 PM CDT 0 recs
Oh...
shrug I felt like I would be a tease if I included only first round match ups…
by hmlee on
Sep 1, 2008 5:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Everybody is going to have a different answer
on whether to discuss or not.
Half the place is so superstitious that there’s going to be 80 grouchy replies.
by Arbusto on Sep 1, 2008 5:49 PM CDT 0 recs
the question
in the subject was meant to be rhetorical, but, point taken…
by hmlee on
Sep 1, 2008 5:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
your data
is quite awful and made me cringe. Small sample sizes do not indicate crap. “The Cubs are currently 2-4, which means that Milwaukee takes the first two games of the NLCS. The next three games are played in Milwaukee, where the Cubs are 4-0. Thus, the Cubs win the next three games of the NLCS.” is probably the stupidest thing I have ever read in my life and follows no real logic. Please, there are more pressing issues you could discuss and/or propose.
by scarymonsters85 on Sep 1, 2008 6:05 PM CDT 0 recs
I find
your critique to be quite offensive and don’t understand why you feel it necessary to call my post stupid or imply that it has no logic. It’s not a scientific or empirical study, but I don’t claim it as such. It’s not a sabremetric analysis, but I don’t present it as such. It’s merely a fun way of looking at potential playoff match ups. You decry small sample size, but it’s not as though there are large sample sizes beyond these games that are relevant. I can’t include historical data because of the fact that any of these teams are different (in some cases very different) from the same team in any other year… how else could one explain the fact that the Tampa Bay Rays are poised to possibly have the worst record in baseball one year and the best record the next? Further, it’s not as though I’m sitting here and guaranteeing that this is going to happen. Chill out dude.
by hmlee on
Sep 1, 2008 6:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I appreciate your effort hmlee
There will always be haters, don’t worry about em.
by fanofthegame on
Sep 2, 2008 8:35 AM CDT
up
0 recs
i have no problem with your post or discussing playoff matchups
but i do think your approach is flawed. in addition to the sample size issue pointed out by scarymonster, an even more fundamental problem is the fact that you ignored the pitching matchups. the regular season features essentially random matchups. the playoffs feature the top pitchers for each team. its so different that reg. season results really don’t matter at all come playoff time.
the pink hat guy is my father
by joeschmitt on Sep 1, 2008 6:23 PM CDT 0 recs
Right right
I thought about pitching match ups, but the problem is, I do not have the familiarity with other team’s pitching rosters that I have with the Cubs. It would therefore be difficult for me to determine which starters any given team would pitch in a series, as well as which pitchers would pitch twice or be saved for any future series… it’s hard enough to determine with the Cubbies, with which I am quite familiar… determining it for any other team would be more difficult. Further, if small sample size is a critique, using pitching matchups would make the sample size smaller due to the number of times any given pitcher has faced any given lineup in the regular season…
by hmlee on
Sep 1, 2008 6:40 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The thought of once again facing Arizona in the first round causes indigestion
We all know our wretched history against the Arizona Diamondbacks, at Chase Ballpark in particular. In a five game series we plan on facing soon to be three time Cy Young Award winner Brandon Webb twice in addition to the very good Danny Haren and the rejuvenated future Hall of Famer Randy Johnson. Plus the D’Backs have a quality bullpen and have added infamous Cubbie killer Adam Dunn.
by MDBNIU on Sep 1, 2008 7:17 PM CDT 0 recs
Yeah. Our history against the Arizona Diamondbacks
includes having SWEPT them at Wrigley earlier this year.
But, Go Arizona, right Blue-Mike?
Our 2008 Chicago Cubs -- FINDING WAYS TO WIN!
by drewishdrewid on
Sep 1, 2008 9:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
jeez leave the guy alone
he makes good points, all of that scares the crap out of me too when it comes to playoff time……do i think we will win, yes
by cubswynn on
Sep 2, 2008 9:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree
I find drewishdrewid far more obnoxious than MDBNIU.
by WashUBearCub on
Sep 2, 2008 9:59 AM CDT
up
0 recs
DIdn't mean to sound like you did.
Just agreeing with your comment, then adding my own.
by WashUBearCub on
Sep 2, 2008 10:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
-1
"I see the playoff schedule posted in the paper, and that stuff makes me nervous because you can't take anything for granted. We have a great team. We have a really good team. We're playing well, but we haven't won yet." - Jim Edmonds, 8/31/08
by dat cubfan daver on
Sep 2, 2008 10:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
At this point...
Its a little silly to put the cart before the horse, and what you’re doing is putting the cart before the horse, the horse before the family, and the family ahead of little timmy the seven year old with a great memory and inquisitive mind.
First thing’s first, the NLDS. I’d prefer to see the Cubs play the Dodgers, Phillies, or Mets.
Come to think of it… I’d just like to see the Cubs win the NL Central, and we’ll go from there.
(I’ll play along… If I had to pick which team I wanted to see the Cubs play in each series, it’d go as follows… Dodgers in the NLDS, Mets in the NLCS, and White Sox in the World Series…)
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on Sep 1, 2008 8:14 PM CDT 0 recs
Here's what I would prefer.
I’d prefer that the Cubs start winning games again, like tomorrow.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on
Sep 1, 2008 8:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
+∞
"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman
by hip2bsquare on
Sep 1, 2008 8:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Agreed
I was just going with the point of the post… I hope this is a sudden lack of concentration by the Cubs, or regression to the mean after such a winning streak, and NOT a sign of things to come.
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on
Sep 1, 2008 8:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well...
If our offense has to take a nap and we lose three in a row for what seems like the first time in forever, I’d rather it happen this week than oh… I don’t know…. the first series in October…. right?
by hmlee on
Sep 2, 2008 7:10 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm sorry
I didn’t mean to offend you hmlee. I was merely trying to point out that the win/loss record against a certain team in the regular season doesn’t translate well into the post-season. Our Chicago Cubs have trampled on many a teams in the NL this year, and while we didn’t fair too well in interleague play, we were also without one of our best hitters. We were also dealing with a major collapse in Carlos Marmol. While I do appreciate your effort in compiling the data, which, as a amateur statistician myself know that it is very time consuming. However, while stats provide insight into a team, without looking at the box scores just know that this Chicago Cub team is not your father’s cubs or your grandfather’s cubs. This team is solid from top to bottom. Also, for those of you who are “afraid” of playing the Diamondbacks in a short series at chase field, know that we are a lot better team than them, including pitching.
by scarymonsters85 on Sep 1, 2008 8:26 PM CDT 0 recs
They're all good when it comes to the playoffs...
Its a matter of going out, executing your pitches and getting big hits. The playoffs have just as much to do with hot streaks as they do with ability.
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on
Sep 1, 2008 8:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You lost me...
…after Okay.
Let’s just wait until things fall into place and the games are actually played. I don’t care how things look on paper, reality always seems to work out quite a bit differently when you factor in the human element of actually competing on the field.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Sep 1, 2008 9:25 PM CDT 0 recs
Can't Fault The Effort And Time Put Forth
Some of the other posters have suggested some other factors and metrics to improve your analysis for next time, so at least consider what they’re saying. You seem to be appreciative of numbers and stats, so you should enjoy learning about some of the newest measures being used by SABR and BP.
Cubs v. Rays? That’s what I’d like to see!
"Sometimes I feel like as a Cubs fan if I’m not worrying about something, I’m not doing it right." - HalfBlindCubbieGirl
by CaliCub on Sep 1, 2008 10:42 PM CDT 0 recs
Yuck (on Cubs v Rays)
Cubs vs either Sox would be more exciting. Angels or Twins? Meh – but better than the Rays.
My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.
by JohnM on
Sep 2, 2008 4:43 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Not only that, but...
… the Cubs got swept by the Rays in June. Don’t want to see that again.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on
Sep 2, 2008 7:15 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Can't forget!
That god awful dome!!! At least if they made the series they might draw 20,000 rays fans…. and 30,000 cubs fans…
by fanofthegame on
Sep 2, 2008 8:40 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I disliked that stadium even before it became the Cubs' house of doom
and even though i’ve never been there.
And back on the White Sox, I’d rather they didn’t face them, but if they did it certainly would make for an exciting series.
My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.
by JohnM on
Sep 2, 2008 9:21 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm always receptive...
To new ways of looking at things like this, I’m not that familiar with baseball stat analysis beyond the basic sabr stuff…..
But you’d really like to see the Rays? I think I’d like that matchup only slightly better than the White Sox, which I’d like to see the least. I think the Red Sox would be interesting… or maybe the Angels….
by hmlee on
Sep 2, 2008 7:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The Sox
would be a good matchup for the cubs. They have aggressive hitters and a familiar home ballpark. We just don’t want to play them for fear of the crap we would all catch if our worst nightmares came true.
by fanofthegame on
Sep 2, 2008 8:38 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Haven't you heard?

"Thank god I threw out my belt & shoelaces."-Bernies Mustache Wax on Evil BCB, 7/31/08
by Bildo1805 on Sep 2, 2008 8:48 AM CDT 0 recs
Bi-Polar BCB
Just a couple days ago, all the FanPosts had titles like “Relentless,” “Our Team Never Gives Up .. Never ..”, “Any Doubt?” and “The Frosting and the Cake.”
Now, the sky is falling.
My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.
by JohnM on
Sep 2, 2008 9:26 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I know
My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.
by JohnM on
Sep 2, 2008 12:01 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This appears to be...
…a very well-researched and thoughtfully written fanpost. Unfortunately, my only response is: See my sig line.
"I see the playoff schedule posted in the paper, and that stuff makes me nervous because you can't take anything for granted. We have a great team. We have a really good team. We're playing well, but we haven't won yet." - Jim Edmonds, 8/31/08
by dat cubfan daver on Sep 2, 2008 10:31 AM CDT 0 recs
Right now...
as cubs fan, we need not to look that far ahead. Yes, things look good now, but they looked just as good in 1969. Forgot about the teams behind us and push for a solid 100 win season.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." - Alvin Dark
by cubs199235 on Sep 2, 2008 4:34 PM CDT 0 recs
Precisely...
…as the old saying goes; “don’t take your eye off the ball”
They got to this point staying in the moment and they have a pretty good manager to keep reminding them of that.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Sep 2, 2008 7:10 PM CDT 0 recs














