Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Is Steve Stone A Tool?

I used to like Stone for his thoughts and analysis but now I just think he is too full of himself.  I'm sure he would have agreed to be pulled from a no hitter when he was a pitcher.  Here are some comments from his appearance on the Mike North show:

Looks like ESPN analyst and former Mets GM Steve Phillips wasn't the only one who didn't think Lou Piniella should have let Carlos Zambrano finish that no-hitter on Sept. 14.

As Elliott Harris pointed out in today's Quick Hits, Sox analyst Steve Stone was on Mike North's Web show and echoed Phillips' sentiments.

They weren't the only ones who thought that because Zambrano was coming off a missed start due to rotator cuff tendinitis, Piniella should have limited his pitch count. Zambrano threw 110 pitches in the no-hitter.

''I don't agree with allowing Zambrano to throw 110 pitches,'' Stone said Tuesday on ''The Mike North Webio Show'' on wildfirerestaurant.com. ''I don't care if it's a no-hitter. The only job that Lou Piniella has to do, and still has to do, is make sure his pitchers are ready.

''I would have pulled him in the sixth. A manager is paid for some very tough decisions and no-hitters are delightful. You can always say you have a no-hitter.

''He is becoming Sammy [Sosa] Jr. They are creating another monster on the North Side.

''This is a really talented guy, but so was Sosa. But the point is, if you remain completely complicit, in guys you know in taking more and more, eventually the tail cannot wag the dog.''

 

What are your thoughts on the Cubs Ex-Analyst?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs  |  Comment 126 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The answer to the question posed in your post's title is...

Yes.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Sep 25, 2008 8:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...

I saw that and thought…“Is the sky blue?”

Comments I had not head, at the very least…though there is a reason Lou gets paid to make these decisions and Stoney gets paid to criticize them

Proudly waving the Cubbie Blue from Northern Missouri! GO CUBS GO!

by Tater01 on Sep 25, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, he is a bit of a tool.

However, he is one hell of a baseball analyst when he’s not pontificating about something. The guy knows the game, but his ego can really get the best of him, which is just a shame.

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Sep 25, 2008 8:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Totally.........

I met him a couple of times. He was always full of himself. One thing I noticed about him right away was how he behaved like he was above the little people.

Even so I used to like him and enjoyed listening to him but over the last couple of years my opinion has really changed.

by cubsgirl2 on Sep 25, 2008 8:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tool

Asking if Stone is a tool is like asking if the Pope is Catholic.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 9:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

To the defense once again

I’m not going to get into what has become one of the most popular things amongst Cubs fans, the continued ripping of Stone.

What I will ask is why these comments make Stone a tool? Disagree with it if you wish. I know I do. But why does this make Stone a tool? This is not a ridiculous argument (again, one that I think is wrong). As for Zambrano becoming another Sosa, Stone is 100% correct.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 9:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Stone is a talented analyst that comes off as a jerk. But the fact is I doubt most of the people ripping him here have ever met him.

As for his analysis, why does that make him a tool? Doesn’t it make sense to limit a pitch count on a guy making $18 million a year who just came off an injury?

Let’s also not forget that after the no hitter, Zambrano has come out and laid two absolute eggs. Is that related to his injury? I don’t know, but it’s certainly a question worth asking.

Regardless of your like/dislike for him, Stone is right. Z’s only job at this point is to win playoff games. And Lou’s job is to make sure he’s ready for that. Based on recent performance, I’d say they’re not setting themselves up correctly..

by dr stabbingworth on Sep 25, 2008 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I see nothing wrong with the comments. It’s just an opinion and this opinion does have merit.

Formerly NO100

by jerry morales rules on Sep 25, 2008 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1000

"Remember each day this year, where you were, what you were doing, who you were with, how you felt as the Cubs win their way through it. Because if this does turn out to be the promised land we have all been waiting for, you will want to remember, savor, cherish every moment..."

by CubsBullsBears on Sep 25, 2008 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to know

whether he thought he could/should be pulled off of the mound in the middle of a no-no when he played.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 25, 2008 9:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If Stone would have been manager...

And walked out to pull Z in the midst of the no-hitter, Z would pound him into the ground like he does to Fontenot, literally though.

"Remember each day this year, where you were, what you were doing, who you were with, how you felt as the Cubs win their way through it. Because if this does turn out to be the promised land we have all been waiting for, you will want to remember, savor, cherish every moment..."

by CubsBullsBears on Sep 25, 2008 9:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Zambrano

Is really the guy who should be focused on. His antics of late have been truly abdominal. His comments in this article border on insubordination:
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/1181210,CST-SPT-cubnt24.article

What troubles me most is this:

’’He’s a good manager. As a human, he makes mistakes also. But he’s human. That’s basically all I have to say about him.’’

I’m not sure if this Carlos saying that Piniella is wrong if he decides to go with someone else to start the first game of the playoffs. But as far as what Stone says, he’s 100% correct in that someone needs to reign in Carlos because he’s turning into Sosa.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 9:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What do his abs have to do with this?

"Remember each day this year, where you were, what you were doing, who you were with, how you felt as the Cubs win their way through it. Because if this does turn out to be the promised land we have all been waiting for, you will want to remember, savor, cherish every moment..."

by CubsBullsBears on Sep 25, 2008 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could be...

Working my abdominals is abominable

"Remember each day this year, where you were, what you were doing, who you were with, how you felt as the Cubs win their way through it. Because if this does turn out to be the promised land we have all been waiting for, you will want to remember, savor, cherish every moment..."

by CubsBullsBears on Sep 25, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think that word means what you think it means.

Insubordination is the willful disobeying of a legal order. Criticising your boss is not insubordination. What more, saying your boss is human and like any human can make mistakes is not even a criticism.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

look at the article

Zambrano was being very critical of Piniella. Its just something that you don’t want or need from your ace pitcher, someone who is going to be here for a long time and one of the key leaders of this team.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Killer abs, dude!

The Chicago Cubs: 2008 Central Division Champions

by dat cubfan daver on Sep 25, 2008 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Z's actin a foo.

Kwa...Ki...Sur...Pee...Nee...Ku?

by Kinky Reggae on Sep 25, 2008 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how does this article make stone full of himself?!

he’s a sports commentator, his job is to do exactly what he did. being full of yourself would be what BB does ever day, talk about your WS ring and your days as a catcher.

and have you guys considered that stoney is right? z throws 110 pitches after an injury and now has had two TERRIBLE starts since….no one else is seeing a correlation between the two?!

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Sep 25, 2008 9:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's not analyzing Baseball

When he commens on the club creating a monster. Did Stone praise Pinnella for making Z go back to the mound when he took the ball from him in his last Wrigley outing. Did Stone say that it was a tough decision for Pinnella to leave him in and that Stone might have felt differently when he was a pitcher?

Zambrano has not had a great month. He has struggled before and after the no hitter. I am also tired of the 100 pitch debate. I do not feel based on the rest Z received that 110 pitches were excessive.

by Chodes on Sep 25, 2008 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes he is

Zambrano’s attitude is seemingly impacting his play on the field. If you do not think that the “creating a monster” issue is not analyzing baseball then you are ignoring the Sosa era at Wrigley.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

See what you want to see

Z has had a couple bad outings. Attributing that to his attitude is quite a leap that you choose to make. A more obvious reason may occur to people when you consider someone coming off a possible injury who then throws a lot of pitches. But you can see what you want to see I guess.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

honestly..

… you don’t think his attitude/behavior has ever gotten in his way? He has basically said so in articles today, saying that he just needs to go out there, relax and have fun.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wish he'd take his own advice.

He pulled the ‘stomping-around’ act again last night. It’s getting really old, Z. Grow up.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Sep 25, 2008 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yup...

… and I’m glad to see that Piniella
a.) isn’t sitting back and letting Carlos’ behavior go unaddressed
and
b.) isn’t letting Carlos’ star status override the needs of the club. Many managers would have Carlos start game 1 regardless of the antics and attitude. Good to see Lou going with Demp.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Attitude

Except you are insinuitaing something different when you say “attitude”. Z is saying he needs to not get so overly upset when things go badly. Remain calm and not over react.

How does a tendancy to over react show he is selfish, or has a big ego?

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zambrano

I’m not sure I said he was selfish or has a big ego. But I do think its an emerging problem and its something that I could see continue to develop. I think that when someone lets their emotions go unchecked and it begins to impact their performance and ultimately the team, though, there is a concern.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fine if you didnt say it, then I am talking to those who did.

Except you say “But I do think its an emerging concern”. What “it”? That he needs to work on controlling his temper? Yes, and we know that and he knows that.

How does Stone’s Sosa comment fit in? Sosa never should a fiery temper. So when he says monster like Sosa he isnt talking temper. So what is he talking about? I understood it to mean ego/selfishness/thinking you are bigger than the team.

How has Z done that? The Sosa comment is crap.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

his pitching

affects his attitude, not the other way around.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+ 700,000,000,000

Hey, if Congress can do it, so can I.

by dr stabbingworth on Sep 25, 2008 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not really.

the correlation is his grandmother’s death, the flying back and forth…

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

okay what about last night?

you can’t imagine how coming off an injury and then throwing 110 pitches would negatively affect his arm?

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Sep 25, 2008 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought...

…he had good stuff last night, but he lost command of the strikezone and made it very difficult on himself. His velocity and movement were very good, he just didn’t throw enouph strikes.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

again, the correlation is his grandmother's death,

the flying back and forth.

He got screwed by the ump last night, too.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The ump had a rough night...

…but good pitchers need to work through that, because its going to happen several times a year. He just completely loses his composure in those circumstances, and actually, I think he has gone backwards in this regard in the last couple of years.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't agree with Stone in this case...

…but it does bring up a good question. How many pitches would’ve been too many.What if Z had thrown 115-120 through 8IP? Do you allow him to go out? I think that number might be different for everyone. But to say that anyone who disagrees with Lou is a tool would be a mistake as most of us disagree with him some.

To the larger comment that Zambrano is turning into a monster, I didn’t agree with him until last night. Knowing this was his last start of the regular season, Zambrano completely lost it on the mound last night. It seemed as much as any night that he still fails to pitch with any kind of game awareness. I have to think some of his teammates are losing confidence when he is on the mound. They don’t know what they’re going to get.

Since the All-Star break, Zambrano has been the Cubs 5th best starter. That’s not a small sample size either (12 starts). Even with a no hitter, Z’s ERA is 5.80 (compare that to Grand Marquis – 4.41). I think any dissappointment directed at Fukudome for having a bad 2nd half ought to be shared by Zambrano. I don’t advocate benching him or anything like that, but there needs to be some accountability. I think Stone hits the nail on the head there.

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 10:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It's not the pitch count

I hate to keep harping on the pre-pitch count days, but all of the greats would have been allowed to keep pitching in that situation — Drysdale, Koufax, Gibson, etc….Z’s mental state, his attitude is the problem here.

I think it is conincidental that these two outings come after the no-hitter. However, it does seem that his ‘all about me attitude’ is getting well out of hand. If you saw the no-no, I think you’d agree he was throwing free and easy. (And of course, the disagreement is Stone’s opinion….the pitch count , with a prior problem led to what’s happening now.)

Stone, like any sports talker is paid to say whatever he wants, and to be controversial, if necessary. Don’t really take anything a talk show says with any seriousness.

However, there is much concern with Zambrano. Perhaps taking him out of that position as ‘ace’ will knock down his ego a bit.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Sep 25, 2008 10:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think a bigger question is...

How is the tendinitis? Is Z healthy NOW? I agree with this post in that Steve Stone has abandoned whatever he had left with Cubs fans, but the more important question is what’s up Z? The no-no had to happen, and it’s in the past now, so get over it, Stoney.

Perhaps an extra day or three would have been enough to give him a mental health break necessary to come down from his last bad start? Perhaps a planned 60 pitch start last night to allow Zambrano to focus on his control and emotions?

So what’s the deal? Is he injured? Has he lost focus? Can we count on him when it matters?

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.

by IowaCubs- on Sep 25, 2008 10:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

you make it seem...

… as though Stone is harping on it

The no-no had to happen, and it’s in the past now, so get over it, Stoney.

Did anyone actually hear the interview? I assume North asked Stone the question and he answered it. Is he supposed to not answer the question? Is he supposed to say “it happened already, so I’m going to not provide my opinion”?

I’d still like to know why Stone’s comments make him a tool, aside from the fact that a lot of people here just want to not like him.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His opinion is...

He’s a former pitcher who never threw a no-hitter. He’s got to have some resentment there. I just doubt his motives are pure in this respect.

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.

by IowaCubs- on Sep 25, 2008 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you kidding?

The man won a Cy Young award. In your estimation, every pitcher who never threw a no hitter has resentment when someone else throws a no-hitter. This is just ridiculous.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, apparently Z is a head case.

We should cut him if he refuses to be more obedient, stop criticzing management, and be more docile on the mound.

Or maybe its just that he isnt throwing strikes. No that couldnt be it.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One question...

…if you had to pick a starter for a 5th game in the NLDS at Wrigley who would it be? Keep in mind, that if the Cubs don’t advance beyond the NLDS how you are going to feel going into the offseason.

I think Zambrano right now would be my 4th choice. That being said, the Cubs still have the best 4 options of any team going to the playoffs (in my opinion).

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 10:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

5 effective options

If Z starts to tank one of his games, pull him and throw out Lilly or Marquis. Don’t even let him implode. If he doesn’t have it, then thrown someone out there who does.

by dr stabbingworth on Sep 25, 2008 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

Here is my opinion on things…

Steve is a bitter man.

Still, in my opinion, he’s kinda like the grandpa who is stuck in his own ways. You listen to what he says, and agree with only parts of it. It’s the same here…

No way Lou, nor anybody should pull a guy from a no-hitter unless the pitcher asks so. That is just how things go…

What he said about Z is absolutely true. I also think a lot of people have thought this but are too afraid to say it.

I have worried for a few years about Z becoming a Sosa. I think there will be one major difference though, and we’ve seen it this season. Z isn’t using steroids to inflate both his ego and his numbers… plus, with out, Z’s body is going to fall apart because his ego won’t allow him to work as hard, nor train as hard, to keep his body in shape enough to be a star for many years. Without the juice, most players are becoming human again. Unless he matures, his body is going to fall apart under the strain of being a MLB player. The real question will be if he’ll ruin his rep before this happens…

If he’d grow up some, learn off of the maturity of plays like Kerry Wood and Ryan Dempster, who work hard to take care of themselves… then Z will be an allstar pitcher for a very long time. Usually though, ego players, unless they cheat, just won’t have the discipline to “keep on a rollin.”

by TheHawkRules on Sep 25, 2008 10:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Maturity

Like insisting you switch from closer to starting pitcher even though no one thinks thats a good idea? That kind of maturity?

Give me a break. A guy who pitches well is mature, and a guy who struggles isnt. Well thats not true, we dont seem to apply that to Howry, or Marquis/Lilly earlier in the year.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Marquis took a lot of flak

for saying what he did in spring training.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he didn't know what he was doing

It was very immature of him to think he could be a starting pitcher.

by LT on Sep 25, 2008 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The answer is simply put; yes!

I learned much that I know of the game of baseball growing up listening and watching Steve Stone. When he was with Harry, (who got him the job by the way), he was great. That is up until the early ‘90s, when it became apparent that Harry wasn’t going to be around forever. At that point, Stone began to correct Harry, make fun of Harry, interrupt Harry… the list goes on. It was obvious that he felt he was the show now. He couldn’t have made a bigger mistake. Harry, even in the later years, was still pretty sharp. He had surgeries, heart attack(s), and stroke(s), and he kept going. Certainly, he lost a little year by year. Cubs fans tuned in to listen to Harry, not to listen to Stone interrupt & belittle him. Stone helped create the “drunk Harry perception”, which sold a lot of Budweisers, but wasn’t really Harry.

Stone is in the entertainment business, analyzing baseball games, whether on radio or TV. He has tried to get into baseball, front office or GM, or even ownership- no one will touch him, and there has to be a reason… I think it’s because he’s a tool. Listen, he gets paid to “analyze”, (as he calls it). That includes giving his opinion, and it seems his opinions, rather than being informed, are instead tinged with bias & jealousy. He is in the job of stirring the pot, making waves. He does it well.

I have lost so much respect for Stone that I can’t listen to him anymore. His comments about Z, how he would have pulled him, are absurd. It doesn’t even deserve my attention. As far as Zambrano being a “Sosa Jr.”, that’s just plain ridiculous. Z is going through a rough patch, and everybody is on his back. He’s not superman, but I still trust him. He always comes back. His velocity was normal last night, and he had good stuff. Those two things are much more important than the runs he gave up, or the walks he gave up, (which were questionable).

I won’t allow Steve Stone to muck up what is a great march on to the ultimae goal of our Cubs bringing home a World Series Trophy. Steve Stone is more than a tool, he’s a prick.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 10:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

care to explain?
His comments about Z, how he would have pulled him, are absurd.

Why are they absurd? Disagree with him… thats fine. I disagree. But I don’t think its as cut and dry as you make it seem. And the comments about him becoming Sosa Jr. are real and I am thankful that Piniella isn’t cowtowing to Zambrano the way that Baker, Baylor and Riggleman did to Sosa.

DmL

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interrupting...

…I don’t remember it that way. I remember as Stone and Harry got more comfortable with each other that Stone began to rib Harry a bit. It was never mean spirited. And you simply weren’t listening if you think that Harry didn’t create the “drunk Harry perception”. I loved Harry, but Harry drank and he created that on his own.

No one in their right mind can deny that Zambrano has been at the center of every big distraction the Cubs have had to deal with in the last few years. It isn’t ridiculous to wonder if his actions are to the detriment of the team.

Anyone who says you can’t pull a guy who has a no-hitter under any circumstance is not being honest. Everyone has got to have a number that is “too high” for a pitch count. What if Zambrano had thrown 135 pitches through 8? Do you pull him then? 140? 150? Your number may be real high. Steve Stone thinks 110 total is too high. I think 125 would’ve been a limit for me. What is your number?

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say he was mean spirited.

Stone felt he had to be the show as Harry declined. I was listening. I was watching. Everyday. Many thought that listening to Stone interrupt Harry was too much, and that is when Stone began to get a big head.

Z hasn’t been a huge distraction. Stone and others have made him out to be. His actions were such a detriment last night that they, gasp, still won the game…

I’m honest, believe me, no manager would have pulled Z. Your suppositions about what if Z had thrown X many pitches, what is your number?: Balderdash. That is all “what-if”; it didn’t go down that way. Z only threw 110 pitches, he had lots of rest beforehand, Lou would of pulled him between 95-100, if Z didn’t have a no-hitter going.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

offbase

Stone was never the show when Harry was around.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Harry was definitely the show

Steve just seemed to chafe at that since he was the brilliant one.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ridiculous

Commenting on pitch count is analysis we can argue about.

We can argue whether Carlos is turning into a “monster”, however it is a personal attack any way you look at it, and is completely out of bounds for a sports analyst. And why is he a “monster”? Because he has had a bad couple of outings? He is selfish, because when he tries to get guys out he has failed recently? Was Soto a “monster” for striking out a bunch of times in a row earlier this year? Was Howry a “monster” most of the year?

Uncalled for personal attack.

As for those posters who call Z, selfish or all about me or big ego’ed or even immature you are falling for stereotypes. I have seen no evidence of Z being a selfish person. Where is all the criticism of Lilly being immature after the glove slam? Why isnt he a “monster” for pitching so poorly in the first half.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

there was plenty of criticism

towards Lilly. PLENTY. And he also admitted he was wrong but most importantly he never did anything like it again. Carlos continues to act like a two year-old. If you don’t think Carlos’ attitude and intensity has gotten in the way of his performance, of his throwing strikes, that your opinion and your entitled to it. But it is not unreasonable to think that it has.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you call him selfish?

Did you say he had a big ego? Did you say he needs to be moved down in the rotation? No.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please...

… point to one other incident that Lilly has had on the mound similar to the mitt incident or similar to the crap Carlos has done. Please do so. Carlos is being questioned based on a treasure trove of mount outbursts. The criticisms towards Carlos is based on a pretty long history.

But the fact of the matter is that what has led people to call on Carlos being moved down in the rotation has been his performance. In my opinion, Carlos’ attitude and volatile emotions have played a contributing role here.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is more than a tool...

…and he still has the majority of the average fans duped (including the media).

From a personal standpoint, they guy leaves a lot to be desired and he has been given a complete pass by the mass media in this town. Also, his vaunted baseball knowledge is also never questioned. Last year, I recall him saying the Cubs needed to make it a priority to sign Barrett to a long term deal (this was in May), and a few weeks later Lou launches the guy.

What amazes me is you would think a pitcher would recognize a horrid catcher when he sees one, but I guess that flew right over his head. In the end, I think Stone let his opinion be swayed by the fact that Barrett used to kiss his ass when he was with the Cubs.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 11:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why are they absurd?

Simply because a pitcher is not pulled from a no-hitter. It’s just how it’s done in MLB. In this particular situation, there was no reason to pull Z, even if pitchers throwing no hitters were routinely pulled from games. Z had plenty of rest between starts, had just had a cortistone short roughly a week before. He threw 15 or so more pitches than Lou really wanted him to, that’s not a ton of pitches. Z was still strong in the 9th during the no hitter.

The “Sosa Jr.” crap- (which is what it is), is made up and purported by Stone & others. It is meant to stir controversy. If Lou was pissed at Z, believe me; we would all know it. Z hasn’t demanded anything from Piniella that would make him “special”, in fact he admitted last night that in the playoffs, Demp should go first. Stone is all about hype to make him look important and right on every point of contention. He’s a prick.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 11:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

actually

there have been plenty of pitchers pulled from no-hitters. After the Zambrano no-hitter there was a list of most recent no-hitters by team. A few had listed combined no-hitters. So it does happen. Again, I don’t agree with pulling Zambrano but its not totally unreasonable to think that you’d pull a guy who has had arm issues this season and is on a team hopefully headed for a title.

I won’t get into the “Sosa jr. crap” as you deem it not to be the case and you’ve made up your mind.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at who gets criticized and who doesnt.

Its not rocket science where these attitudes come from.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

I have no idea what you’re getting at

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rare, but not unheard of

There have been nine combined no-hitters. The last was the Astros over the Yankees in 2003. That was a weird one. Oswalt went just one inning and the bullpen no-hit the Yankees.

I think Stone is off-base about the pitch count. 110 is not astronomical. BUT, I think Zambrano has Sosa-like potential. The stomping around, the up-and-down personality, the weird refusal to drink liquid there for a while. All we need is a sneeze and a doctored baseball and we have the whole package.

I loved Stoney. Baker will always be beneath contempt in my eyes for the way he handled that situation. I’d throw Brenly over in a second if Stone came back.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Baker did handle...

…it poorly, and he should have made sure his players (and himself) would rise above the situation.

With that said, it doesn’t change the fact that Stone was not a favorite of many who had to deal with him on a day to day basis. What happened in 04 was a build up of stuff over a period of time, and Stone was very much invloved in the “building” part.

The guy is not well liked or respected by the majority of players, managers or front office people. He is where he is, because the fans are not exposed to what others see, and he has gotten a pass from scrutiny on many fronts.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

interestingly

Stone still had a good relationship with MacPhail, McDonaugh and others with the Cubs beyond his tenure with the Cubs.

by dmlichte on Sep 25, 2008 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know...

…about McPhail, but McDonough’s first thoughts are on public relations, and that is why he needed to do that. Also, McDonough also recognized that Stone was popular with most of the public, and that is what McDonough keeps his pulse on.

In regards to the baseball people, it was a completely different story. They saw Stone for what he was, and didn’t care what his public perception was.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will always hold Stone in contempt for the way...

he tried to insinuate himself into the Cubs clubhouse under Baker’s tenure. Baker told him to mind his own business, as he should have. Stone created a major distraction in ‘04. He’s a prick with an axe to grind.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You lost me at Baker...

That man has no credibility with anything. If he told me the sky was blue, I’d wonder if he was lying.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Baker has a track record as a proven winning player & manager.

He almost got our Cubs to the WS. It was shameful the way that Dusty was run out of town. He managed the first back-to-back winning seasons for the Cubs in 30 years. Dusty has so much credibility that he now manages the Reds, apparently many people find Dusty credible.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And...

he has skated on the Bartman game. Bartman is in hiding. Alou is a twit who keeps changing his story and Alex Gonzalez is now mostly blamed.

But Baker wouldn’t get up off his fat ass to make a mound visit to at least calm everyone down. And then he presided over a horrid collapse the next year, all the while enabling clowns like Patterson and LaTroy.

Baker won’t be managing the Reds by the All-Star break next year. Sooner if the Cardinals and LaRussa part ways.

Baker can go back to worrying about who his daughter is screwing.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Baker would have gone out to the mound, that magically changes the outcome.

Enabling, he played the players that the cubs had. They ran out of steam, and were distracted by Stone trying to be a part of it all, thinking he was the manager or GM. If the Reds were going to fire him, they would have done so already.

The Bartman play was fan interference, a call missed by the umps beause none of them were in position to make the call. Alou was pissed, I was pissed. Alou is a respected veteran MLer.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

WOW... that may have set a record

for incorrect statements in one post

1) He played Neifi Perez, LaTroy Hawkins and Corey Patterson long past any reasonable person would have cut bait

2) The Reds won’t fire him while the season is still going on. But today’s “Corey isn’t dating my daughter” nonsense might make it sooner rather than later

3) Bartman should have left the ball alone, but it wasn’t interference. The fan has the right to the ball if it’s in the stands. And 15 other fans were going after it too.

4) And if it was interference, why didn’t Baker move his butt from the dugout to say something to the umps? He might as well have been replaced with a wax replica of himself that game.

Baker was a short-term gain that resulted in major setbacks from the franchise. Only when the team was almost entirely made over did they succeed again.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Be logical.

Baker played with the team that Hendry gave him. If he cuts bait, then other players have to take their place; management wasn’t going to overhaul the roster no matter what happened.

The Reds have had plenty of time to fire Baker during this year, sometimes it would have been justified, other times not.

I’ve watched the Bartman play over & over. Not only did Bartman have his arm over the railing and into the field of play, others did as well. The railing on the wall there in Wrigley demarcates the field of play from the stands. By rule, if you reach over the railing at that point in Wrigley, you are reaching into the field of play. It was interference. Bartman wasn’t even in the front row! He had to reach over others in front of him to interfere with that ball.

Why didn’t Baker go out and argue interference? I don’t know. He probably couldn’t see the play with the way the field was at the time.

It’s obvious to me that you really need someone to blame, and Dusty is an easy target.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can honestly say I have

not watched that game or inning again and avert my eyes when the Bartman play comes on ESPN or Fox.

Disposable dixie cup drinkin... I'm hiding out in the big city blinking...

by N Oakley on Sep 25, 2008 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't for a while.

I have watched that play, because I can’t stand that people blame Bartman, while at the same time they deny the fact that his contact with the ball should have been called interference.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty =/= Credible

The theory I find credible is that Dusty looks good from afar. While he had talented, self-policing players in SF, he looked like a good manager. Always good for a quick quote. However, at the end Giant fans and management were happy to shove him out the door as they knew the reat Dusty Baker.

He arrived in Chicago to great fanfare and succeeded the first year with self-policing players including Karros, Grudz and Miller. He was still good for a quick quote.

Without the strong clubhouse guys the wheels fell off and at the end, Cub fans and management were happy to shove him out the door.

Dusty as a good manager is a mirage that does not withstand close scrutiny. The Reds are the latest team to fall for it and they will be damaged at the end.

Disposable dixie cup drinkin... I'm hiding out in the big city blinking...

by N Oakley on Sep 25, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Pluto was a dog

no wait, a Roman god.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Combined_No_Hitters

I said it was rare.

7/12/97 Francisco Cordova went nine innings; Ricardo Rincon finished it for a 10-inning no hitter. Pittsburg beats Astros

4/11/90 Mark Langston goes seven. Mike Witt finishes. Angels beat Mariners.

Others have been starters going five, six…

Here’s a fun one. In 1917, Babe Ruth was ejected after walking first batter. He records no outs. Ernie Shore finishes the game with a no-hitter. Boston beats Wash. Senators.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rare indeed.

I wonder what the extenuating circumstances were surrounding the Cordova & Langston games, (besides the fact that the Cordova game went extra innings).

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Sep 25, 2008 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that only tells you about the games

that ended as a no hitter. I wonder how many others got pulled and the relief pitcher gave up a hit?

by LT on Sep 25, 2008 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Prior was pulled from a no-hitter...

….after 5.2IP in 2006 because of a pitch count by Dusty. The game was inconsequential (for the opposite reason) and Prior’s health had been an issue moreso than Zambrano’s. But there are plenty of examples of managers taking pitchers out with no-hitters.

In July 1997, Gene Lamont pulled Francisco Cordova after 9IP (121 pitches). At the time the Pirates were in a tie for 1st place.

Kent Mercker was pulled from a no-hitter with the Braves in 1991. Bobby Cox made the call there.

So no the “this is just how it’s done in MLB” isn’t really true. There are plenty of other examples out there besides these.

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, but Z's no hitter

WASN’T inconsequential. The Astros were a team on fire, and they’d swept the Cubs at Wrigley. Z was dominating. You don’t pull him.

I think all this talk about how Z is a baby is crap. He’s an emotional man. He may have problems working through his emotions, but when he takes some time to try and talk himself down, he’s hollered at for acting like a baby. He can’t win.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We both know that Z wasn't left in the game...

…because it was the best chance to win. If he had given up an infield single in the 2nd and the record books weren’t involved, Zambrano would’ve been relieved after 7.0, maybe 8.0IP. So, I agree the game wasn’t inconsequential, but leaving Z out there had more to do with no-hitter than game management. Lou even said so.

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's fine

but don’t suggest that the game wasn’t important.

I wouldn’t have wanted to take him out. Screw the next two starts. No-hitters are forever.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Sep 25, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Answer to Post Heading

Yes

Join the BCB Flickr Group: http://flickr.com/groups/bleedcubbieblue

by tony412 on Sep 25, 2008 11:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The only thing Z and Sosa have in common are being a star player on the Cubs

Sosa ended up being egocentric, selfish, and literally walked out on his team.

Z cares so much about his team that he takes bats (sometimes his own fist) to water coolers, breaks bats, and yells at himself on the mound when he lets the team down.

If you can’t see how the Sosa comment was utter crap than I dont know what to say. I guess you have made up your mind, so we can leave it at that.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Smashing water coolers

Is not impressive. It’s a stupid, destructive thing to do.

At least he isn’t breaking bats over his knee any longer.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fine

But stupid and emotional still isnt selfish/egotistical/me-first/monster

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not yet...

And I don’t agree with Stone in that it’s already happened. I’m saying the potential is there. Pinella seems to have a handle on it.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its easy to be a critic...

…from the booth, but Piniella can handle Z as well or better than any manager in baseball today. One thing Stone could never do, is command near the respect (from players) that a guy like Piniella could.

There is a big difference between making comments in the booth and being in a position to lead players each and every day and have to make the decisions. If Stone was in Piniella’s spot, he wouldn’t last a week trying to make tough decisions under pressure and trying to get respect from the players. His type just wouldn’t get it done in the real world of those he critiques.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 !

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Sep 25, 2008 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Neither would most of us....

…but that doesn’t stop us from critiquing Lou’s decisions. Steve Stone has alot more credibility than anyone on this board. Not being insulting, but he did win a Cy Young and has spent his life in baseball.

"I'm petrified of nipple chafing. Once it starts, it's a vicious circle." Andy Bernard

by TXCub on Sep 25, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

See my post below

They arent related. They come from opposite attitudes. When did Sosa ever beat himself up over his performance? An egotisitical person doesnt care that they let the team down. As long as he got his dingers Sosa was happy.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zambrano

Zambrano also flew back and forth to Venezuela while dealing with an extremely tough personal loss to be with his team.

Stone will probably say he shouldn’t have gone.

I wonder if it still is affecting him emotionally.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steve Stone

Steve Stone keeps saying he is going to put his Cubs years behind him has he announced when that is going to happen?

He keeps bringing up Sosa.

Sosa and Stone both departed the Cubs after the 04 season. Which one has put his experience behind him and acted like an adult?

Not Stone.

If anyone has been immature it’s been Stone.

Do we ever hear Sosa going out of his way to make personal attacks against his former team? No.

Who has supposedly called to congratulate Hendry this last week? Not Stone. (Heard the Sosa thing elsewhere).

Who has been quoted as saying he is happy for Kerry Wood and his comeback? Not Stone who repeatedly has made it obvious he hopes kerrys arm falls off.

Who will probably root for the Cubs all the way? Not Stone.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 11:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No one ...

gives a rat’s butt what Sosa has to say for himself. Stone still gets paid to talk baseball. There’s your difference as to credibility.

Pluto will always be a planet to me!

by DaBard on Sep 25, 2008 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stone

Stone goes out of his way to make personal attacks against Hendry especially. He could be asked what is the weather outside and he’d find a way to make a personal attack.

I can’t believe there are actually people that wish he was the Cubs GM.

Sosa has been called by reporters about the Cubs and he always makes respectful comments.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He gets paid...

…for one reason, he has people like you duped.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fans

People are Steve Stone fans. He was good but very overrated in my opinion.

I find Bob Brenly more enjoyable. He doesn’t make it personal. I don’t know who he likes and dislikes on the team on a personal level. We knew who were Steve Stones pets.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stone gives a lot...

…of clues of what he is like behind the curtain, but most choose to ignore those.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

Agreed with the comment below that while he may be a good analyst, he doesn’t seem like a good person.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Sep 25, 2008 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steve Stone is a good analyst

He just doesnt seem like a nice person.

Reed Ballgame - best CF in the MLB

by californiachicagoan on Sep 25, 2008 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

IF this were Camp Dusty, I'd be concerned

But we’re talking about LOU here. Does anyone think he’s as nutty as he can appear to be during his press conferences? I do not. He’s smart as – if not smarter than – a fox.

NFW and I mean NFW would Lou and Larry let Z self destruct what ever could be ailing him in the name of a no-no.

Stoney is entitled to his opinion and often he goes the route of a columnist rather that a reporter. He’s an arrogant ass and everyone knows it. It is also the reason why he’s not the GM, pitching coach, manager or whatever anywhere.

Lou has the big prize in sight. He knows the team has to be relaxed but still play hard. Look how they rallied last night. You’d think a team down 5-1 after 3 could just mail it in knowing they’ve clinched all they can in a regular season? Yup, but they didn’t and that is a testiment to Lou’s system.

Zambrano has one physical issue and it really stems from his mental approach. He has to learn he DOES NOT have to throw the ball through the catcher. Once he can learn to pitch instead of throw – and there’s a huge difference there – he will be one of the top few pitchers of all MLB. Right now he’s good, really good. But no one will put him in their top 5, maybe not even top 10.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Sep 25, 2008 12:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Stone

Stone is a polarizing figure. People seem to either think he’s Jesus Christ or think he’s Satan nothing much in between.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 12:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

north and stone

they would make a great show.

And talking about tools. North is the biggest tool to ever populate the Chicago radio scene.

Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Sep 25, 2008 12:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Carlos Zambrano is a headcase

We all understand this. Fortunately for the Cubs Lou Piniella has a true ace in Rich Harden and a pitcher having a phenomenal year in Ryan Dempster to pitch ahead of Carlos Zambrano. Taking the pressure off the enormously gifted Zambrano is huge.

by MDBNIU on Sep 25, 2008 1:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Steve Stone is a very smart and very bitter guy

He speaks the truth on most occasions. And he is quite observant on things and doens’t pull punches. But he has bitterness toward the Cubs, and for good reason.

by MDBNIU on Sep 25, 2008 1:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would add...

…the Cubs have very good reason (those that dealt with him on a daily basis) to be happy he is gone.

His is smart and he is very bitter, but his bitterness has also gotten in the way of his objectivity. Like most folks with enourmous egos, he fails to comprehend his role in why things went sour with the Cubs, so he chooses to blame others.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 25, 2008 1:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Stone remains very astute on things....

I was in the car the other day and caught a Sox game on the radio when there wasn’t anything else to listen to. Stone still maintains the observational touch that made him famous with the Cubs. He knows the game very well, and he knows players and situations very well too.

by MDBNIU on Sep 25, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stone, Morgan, Phillips......

are the worst! Stone and Morgan always talk about themselves. Phillips is just plain bad, and Morgan also seems to have a wee bit of racism in his remarks from time to time.

Also, am I the only one who also thinks the guys on Baseball Tonight are complete goobs?

At least they haven’t all gone Olbermann on us……

by MSCub on Sep 25, 2008 1:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They are painful to watch...

Eric Young, Orestes Estrada, and Fernando Vina are painful to listen to. My favorite is John Kruk, he looks so uncomfortable up there stuffed into that suit, under those lights, sweating…

"Remember each day this year, where you were, what you were doing, who you were with, how you felt as the Cubs win their way through it. Because if this does turn out to be the promised land we have all been waiting for, you will want to remember, savor, cherish every moment..."

by CubsBullsBears on Sep 25, 2008 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Eric Young sounds like he sucked on a helium baloon while simultaneously getting kicked in the nuts. Fernando Vina is a whole world of bad all onto his own. I like John Kruk, but apparently he has quit Nutrisystem for Men because every night it looks like he put on another 10 pounds.

by MDBNIU on Sep 25, 2008 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steve Stone is a tool

…..and I hate him. I hated him with the Cubs; arrogant SOB.

If I met Steve Stone I would confront him. Period. He is a jerk IMO. Small man syndrome who must be sleeping with Dan Bernstein.

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Swung on belted!!!"---Chip

by Hammer on Sep 26, 2008 12:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
P272649reg_small
VERY OT: The BT Football, "Congrats to ballhawk" & "Sorry, sue369" Thread
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1
Derrick_rose_poster_by_rokasm_small
You know you want him, Get it done Jim!
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Player Picture Puzzles

Recent FanPosts

Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Dscn2381_small
Cubs 2010 2B and "the L word"
Cubswin712_small
Is there anyway we trade some of our high-priced players?
Yelloncard_small
Milton Bradley Named NL "LVP" By Joe Posnanski
Self-portrait-4_small
Crazy Idea: Rob Quinlan
10424_528302137858_173702948_31567344_967269_n_small
OT: Big Ten Football Thread, Nov. 21
Small
Grabow to sign

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

Cubs install sign boards in bleachers to block Horseshoe Casino (Budweiser) building...
This one is for you sabermetricians
A Chicagoan, Part Of Cardinals Ownership Group, Dies
Making Fun Of Tim Lincecum's Hair...
Minor League Ball Interview With Billy Beane
Castillo Rumor Won't Go Away
Minor League FA's
The Cubs Debut of Turk Wendell: A Cautionary Tale Of Classic Cubs History
Slightly OT re: Cards

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman