Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

My Cubs Top 50 prospects, 1-14

I will post the tentative revised order (along with a couple slot changes), with the Indians prospects, below as a post, otherwise this would be too insanely long, along with sleeper/breakout guesses at some point as a post.

Star-divide

14.  Micah Hoffpauir, 1st, C+. 

I'm not fond of any 28 year old being considered this highly on any prospect list.  That said, our system is weak and you've got to give Micah some credit.  This Micah Hoffpauir isn't the same one that first made it back to AAA ages ago in 2005, the one that had a .268/.334/.342 line.  This Micah is better than the one that got briefly demoted to AA in 2006 for Brandon Sing.  Micah's always had raw power - he now balances that with better contact ability, making him a viable major leaguer.  His declining walk rate is a concern, but it is matched with a similar steep drop in K rate.  Overall, he's simply a better hitter from 4 years ago.  He put up insane numbers last year, particularly a .390 ISO.  Perhaps the most interesting numbers to me from his AAA 2008 numbers is his flyball percentage of 49.8.  His AAA MLE line would've been solid (.296/.331/.575), but to expect him to put up that level of numbers and power in the major leagues is probably a bit unlikely, particularly since his .920 OPS in 2007 in AAA showed he could hit that level pitching quite well already, so his 2008 stats have to be taken with a grain of salt.  I'm not going to breakdown the stadium numbers to get a more accurate picture of Micah, but Micah has hit pretty well on the road in recent years as well.  Micah is also, by most accounts, a fine glove at first base.  This is, on paper, a guy deserving of a chance to start on a poor team in the MLB, and thus, deserving of a C+.  His stint with us showed that he had some problems with certain pitches that he had to work on, but nothing glaring.  Barring a trade, though, he will be a cheap, cost-controlled bench option for us, a guy to provide left handed power starting in 2009.  If you think he's deserving of a starting chance to start on a good team, then his ranking could go higher.  Marcel projects a .287/.351/.449 line for him btw.

13.  Esmailin Caridad, SP, C+.

I went back and forth between Atkins and Caridad for a long time.  At the end of the day, Atkins was the nod.  Caridad's been the hot name this offseason, with folks talking him up.  I'm a bit skeptical, but then again, more knowledgeable people have posted on him before, so it may be me being cautious.  Esmailin's a slender guy, but his throwing motion and mechanics haven't been suggested as anything that would cause a problem.  After struggling in April, Caridad settled down in May and June in Daytona, enough to deserve a bump to AA Tennessee.  There, due to quite a bit of luck (BABIP .221), he posted a 7-3 record with a 3.16 ERA despite a 5.48 FIP (posting the overall Daytona numbers doesn't make much sense to me, as he had that sharp April vs. May/June split in performance).  In Tennessee, he maintained the low 2 walk rate that he showed at Daytona while upping his K rate to the low 5 range.  The 1.59 walk rate is a disconcerting sign, though.  Caridad had a decent Arizona, which got a lot of people buzzing, as there were some reports of increased velocity.  That said, he was coming out of the pen.  In AA, he was more effective against righties than lefties.  He offers a low 90's fastball, a solid curve, and a decent change, but his best asset is that he throws strikes.  If Caridad can maintain plus velocity while still maintaing the curve/change (and the ability to locate), then he is far more intriguing, but color me not sold on his ability to maintain the plus velocity just yet.  As of now, he profiles as a back of the rotation option or a pen arm.  Fleita indicated that Caridad may start in AAA, but wherever he starts, I expect him to be a backup plan to Atkins if we need a stretched out arm to call up.

12.  Mitch Atkins, SP, C+.

The presence of Gallagher the last few years sort of made Atkins less visible, as Gallagher was a far better talent.  That said, Mitch has been quietly productive since entering our system and he had a strong 2008 campaign that finished in AAA.  He stepped onto the scene in 2006 when he had an excellent campaign at Peoria, going 13-4 with a 2.41 ERA (although he had a 3.52 FIP), while posting an 8.26 K rate and a 3.45 walk rate.  He followed it up with a solid 2007 in Daytona, although the K rate dropping to 6.9, along with a 4.27 FIP compared to the 3.13 ERA, suggested that he was a bit lucky and that he profiled more as an end of the rotation option.  He struggled a bit in his short stint in 2007 at AA, but in 2008, he performed much better in AA, seeing his K rate go to 7.2 and the walk rate dipping to 2.21, before finishing it off with a 8-1 record in AAA.  He posted a 4.07 FIP in his 2008 AA go around, with a 3.76 ERA, but he had a 4.47 ERA to a 5.70 FIP, showing that he benefited from his .253 BABIP in AAA.  His rising HR rate has been a tad troubling the last few years, and as noted, he has been a guy who has benefited from a bit of luck in his quick run up the Cubs system, moving steadily up the system since he entered as an 18 year old in 2004, with only the brief repeat of AA this past year as the only slowdown.  Atkins throws a high 80's fastball that occasionally gets into the low 90's, with a decent curveball, a cutter, and a change.  He's a back of the rotation option, or perhaps a pen arm, although I have questions on how good he would adjust to the pen as anything more than a long man or the rare ROOGY with his curve.  I expect him to start 2009 in Iowa as a stretched out arm, someone to call upon off the 40 man in an emergency situation.  Both Esmailin and Mitch get some bonus points for their "readiness" and thus were moved ahead of arms with higher ceilings.

11.  Dan McDaniel, P, C+.

The 431st pick (14th round) from Chabot College was a guy who had been reported as a solid Oklahoma State guy before we snapped him up and spent a bit to make sure he signed.  There's a poster on BCB (or maybe it was Sickels) that knows him or played with him (I forget who right now, my apologies) that can tell more about Dan than I ever could.  The big 6'3" 220 pounder runs a mid-90's fastball coupled with, iirc, a plus curveball, and usable slider and change.  After a stopover (2.1 innings) in Arizona, he was sent to Boise, where he proceeded to dominate, getting 7 saves and posting a 1.67 ERA with 45 K's, in 32.1 innings, while having a 0.96 WHIP and giving up only 1 long ball.  Yes, he was helped by a 0.220 BABIP (FIP at 2.58), but still, he was awfully good, and the power stuff is there.  Personally, I'd prefer to see him as a starter in 2009, as I'd love to see if he can be a power starting arm.  He started a bit at Chabot.  That said, I'm expecting him in the pen, probably Peoria to start, for 2009, although he could move fast.  Some will say this is high - I think the upside and performance were there, and I don't think he's that far behind Cashner's upside (Cashner's upside is better, not debating that, though).

10.  Hak-ju Lee, SS, C+.

There isn't much I can say here that other people haven't already pointed out online (and as noted, nothing here is new, just a fan).  I'll point you to Aaron Shinsano's article on him awhile back (for those that don't know, Shinsano scouts for us in the Far East now).  Maybe I'm being too cautious on this one.  I'd like to see some production first, and the few reports on his time stateside indicated that he was a work in progress, particularly with the power.  With another shortstop that's toolsy and has had production, along with having an excellent scouting report, I couldn't justify placing Lee ahead as of now, but who knows, Lee could very well be the top guy in our system next year if he's as good as many suggest.  I imagine XST/Arizona or Boise is the route for him in 09.

9.  Starlin Castro, SS, C+.

Considering there's that article where Tim Wilken professed his love for all things Starlin, where he compares Starlin to Tony Fernandez, I'll link that here as that tells you how our front office feels about him.  I forgot where it was, but some folks do wonder if Starlin is a utility player in the making.  That said, the tools and performance from his time at Arizona deserve recognition.  BA recognized him as the 14th best prospect in Arizona, 2 ahead of teammate Junior Lake.  BA noted that he handles curveballs well for his age, and his frame should fill out some more, perhaps leading to more power.  He had an excellent season, finishing up at .308/.361/.458, with a strong 2nd half, and by most accounts, a good fall.  I'm not sure where Starlin goes.  Samson was the only shortstop that was mildly intriguing and ahead, assuming Flaherty is moved to 2nd, so a spot is open at Peoria, but I could also see them start him at XST for a little bit and then bump him up quick to Peoria, or I could see them slow play it and go to Boise, although I doubt that.

8.  Tyler Colvin, OF, C+.

Was it really due to injury?  Tim Wilken's bold gamble a few years ago fits the toolsy profile that Wilken likes.  Keep in mind that Wilken is considered "old-school".  Tyler showed improved discipline this year, increasing his walk rate to 7.5% and only striking out 18.7%, a 3.2 % decline from his AA campaign in 2007.  Colvin also finished strong, but on the whole, his season was a disappointment.  Following up a 2007 that saw him rise rapidly to AA, expectations were high.  He tried to force more discipline this year, but as many have noted, he hit better when he was swinging away.  It's certianly possible that the forcing of discipline didn't have him react naturally.  That is, his instincts were taken away.  It's also possible that the injury played a role.  That said, maybe it's nothing and that Tyler Colvin is what he appears to be, a LF prospect that can pinch elsewere if needed, toolsy, but with average power and discipline issues that will on occasion lead to spurts of succeess coupled with some hard times.  One thing that stood out to me, while fully acknowledging that Colvin's 2008 was a tale of the last month vs. the whole season, is that Colvin's final 2007 AA line (267 AB's), .281/.306/.438, a line buttressed by a red hot August (.319/337/.511) wasn't all that different from his final 2008 AA line (541 AB's) of .257/.313./425, a line made better by his red hot August (.342/.368/.615).  Who is Tyler Colvin?  Well, it's been suggested that he'll start at Daytona as he works his way back, so it might be until the summer when we get a more accurate gauge on where he is.  If he can find some balance between instinct and discipline, the upside is still there, an upside that was likened to Shawn Green once upon a time, IIRC.  With the Cubs likely to sign an OF, Colvin's future is as a trade chip if he can bounce back.

Ranking the C+'s:  Colvin gets the top nod as he's the furthest along.  After that, shortstop is just more valuable to me than end of the rotation arms, pen arms, or a 28 year old 1st baseman, and Castro's performance beats Ju's unknown for me.  I think McDaniel's upside intrigues me more than two arms in Esmailin and Mitch whose value is higher on account of readiness moreso than how they project, although I can buy flipping that in any order.  Micah's age and position hurt him slightly, but as noted, there's a case to be made for pushing him higher.

7.  Jovan Rosa, 1st, B-.

In the final Draft and Follow class (2006), we netted two intriguing guys in the spring of 2007.  Jordan Latham has positioned himself well in our system pen arm depth.  The other acquisition was Jovan Rosa from Lake City Community College (Fl.), where he was his conference's player of the year.  A former collegiate shortstop, Rosa has been excellent since joining the Cubs system.  Let's get the one major downside out of the way - he was never going to stick at short, and the Cubs had hoped he could play third.  His future, though, is likely at first (or maybe the OF, the arm is there).  He's a fairly big kid who will likely grow into his frame some more.  He was solid in 2007 in Arizona and was jumped to the MWL this year.  He posted an excellent .293/.353/.443 line, with some consistency outside of a power drop in June.  Breaking those basic numbers down a bit more, .293 would be 7th in the MWL, .353 was tied for lucky number 13, and .443 was tied for 12th, with the .796 OPS tied for 9th.  That's solid folks.  Yes, he was likely the beneficiary of a bit of luck pushing him along, but there's potential, and yet, many seem to dismiss him (Sickels didn't have him in his top 20, supposedly wasn't even close to the BA MWL Top 20 list).  Jim Callis was high on Rosa's power potential, as he netted a league high 43 doubles.  Now, I fully acknowledge though, that I'm probably higher on Rosa than most.  Besides the defensive issues, the whole thing on his offense revolves around potential.  That is, Rosa getting bigger, Rosa getting stronger, and Rosa's power developing, because he'll need plus power at first.  But I'm buying it, and hence the B- and the 7th slot.  He's got a good stroke that should be conducive to a solid average.  The 7.7% walk rate is fine, the 26.4% K rate needs to come down some more.  I imagine Rosa will start 2009 as Daytona's first baseman, with Marquez Smith at 3rd and perhaps Ryan Flaherty/Nate Samson.  If all goes well, he could be in line to take over for Derrek Lee at first base come 2011.  Don't lose sight of him folks, although don't place your chips just yet.

6.  Welington Castillo, C, B-.

I've slid him down to a B- from my previous rankings.  At the end of the day, the question I had to ask was, is he a top level talent?  If not, why not?  Our top catching prospect, the 21 year old really burst onto the scene in 2007, where he posted a .271/.321/.423 line.  He has excellent defensive potential, with a strong arm and some athleticism.  He gunned down 35.5% of runners this year, with a higher rate of 43% in AA.  There is room for some more power development.    Castillo had a cup of tea in AAA this past year, but was largely at Daytona/Tennessee.  He posted an excellent .298/.344/.414 line in AA, but that needs to be taken with a grain of salt, as his numbers were carried by an insanely hot June, before sliding in July and August.  I think he's fairly underrated amongst catching prospects in the minors, but at the end of the day, he isn't an elite catching prospect in the minors yet.  The thing with Castillo is that it's still projection - projecting that he'll get better defensively, projecting that his bat will continue to improve.  By next year, he may very well be one of the top catching talents in the minors.  In some ways, he projects similarly to Geovany Soto.  He should start 2009 in Tennessee, I think, with Hill/Johnson in AAA and Bako looking like the MLB backup.  If we don't deal him, there's a chance he's our backup in 2010, but in all honesty, with Soto set, and with other young catching talent behind, Castillo is, in all likelihood, a trade asset, and a potentially excellent asset.

5.  Ryan Flaherty, 2nd, B-.

The 12th ranked prospect in BA's NWL Top 20 list was Pedro Alvarez's protection back in Vanderbilt.  He got off to an excellent start in Boise, but what is fairly clear is what was known at the time of the draft - he's not sticking at shortstop.  That said, with a .297/.366/.511 line, even as he moves up, he should be an excellent 2nd base option, which I imagine the Cubs will move him to soon, perhaps to start 2009 in Daytona.  There are some that suggest the Cubs may give him another go at short, perhaps starting him out in Peoria.  He easily is our top 2nd base prospect right now, a guy that projects to have plus power for the position.  So, why B-?  Color me cautious, but I want to see how things play out.  He should get physically stronger, but a 2nd base prospect isn't as interesting as a shortstop prospect.  He's still developing his overall power as well, as he's more gap power right now, so let's see how the power numbers shake out as he moves up, although it could be balanced by physical maturation.  I understand I'm probably in the minority on this, and maybe I'm carrying too much from the conversation with PaulThomas, but I somewhat buy what people are saying on Flaherty.  I admit I might be cautious here and come next year, he may be topping our system with an outside shot at the bigs.  Some folks suggest he could move to third, but with Vitters at the same level as Flaherty, I don't see that happening with us.

4.  Andrew Cashner, RP, B-.

This one may catch some folks off-guard, but more for who I have at 3.  Cashner represents another attribute of Wilken - Tim really follows guys that he likes real well, as Wilken saw Flaherty as a kid before he matured, and Tim also liked the Matulia family a lot.  We drafted Cashner in 2007 as well, as a 29th round pick when he was a middling starter with a low 90's fastball, inconsistent slider and curve, and a just developing changeup.  Then, TCU moved Cashner to the pen, and off he went.  The velocity jumped up to the mid-upper 90's and the slider was nasty.  I believe one draft site (pgcrosschecker?  gotta go look it up again) said that the move to the pen allowed him to just blow guys away, rather than having to think too deeply, which is a very telling statement in some respects about his future.  After struggling a bit in regular season stops in Boise and Daytona, he stepped it up in the playoffs, when he was flat out dominant.  He's still go some control issues to iron out, or he becomes a plus version of Kevin Gregg instead of the Brad Lidge comparisons some have thrown around.  That said, there's all the makings of a dominant pen arm.  So ... why a fairly cautious B-?  Again, maybe I'm just being overly cautious here, but he is a pen arm and I want to see some production in the upper levels.  There's a lot of guys that toss a similar arsenal.  Maybe not as good, but similar.  Let's see how he tightens up his control as he moves up before really sliding him in as the dominant closer talent.  He's close to where Ceda was, but not there yet (I don't think his stuff matches Ceda's, and Ceda had better control).  I can see the Cubs following a Ceda-like 2008 path for him in 2009, starting Cashner out in Daytona, perhaps in a stretched out role to improve the change, and then perhaps sliding him to Tennessee.  There's a shot he's in the bigs in September if all goes well.  He'll be a pen arm, and a potentially good one, a guy that we may look at as a setup man perhaps as soon as 2010.  One side note, BA did say that if he had qualified with innings, he would've been a top 10 prospect in the NWL.

3.  Jay Jackson, SP, B-.

This is the one large reorganization that I did.  At the end of the day, I couldn't justify not placing him this high, and I'll explain why in a bit.  Another former 2-way player (OF), Jay Jackson, a philosophy major (something Sickels loves to highlight) was drafted out of Furman for his arm after the improvement he showed in 2008.  Jackson is a superb athlete, perhaps in the top level in our system overall, but his future is with his arm.  He has a loose arm, in a positive way, with a good delivery and mechanics.  Add in his athleticism and the injury risk is probably lessened.  Despite being raw to full-time pitching, Jay Jackson showed an advanced slider to go with a low-mid 90's fastball that, by some reports, showed excellent sink.  There are some that wonder if he's living off the slider in the lower levels (suggesting he's not as good as he seems - think the suggestions about Rich Hill years ago).  I would argue that Jackson's fastball has more than enough juice, and he has shown a usable change and curve before (the change being the more important pitch for obvious reasons).  As he adjusts to full-time pitching, and as he gets stronger (losing some of his athleticism perhaps), he should add some velocity to the fastball.  After a quick stopover in Boise (9 innings), he jumped to Peoria, where he was excellent, going 2-2 in 6 games (1 start, 24 total innings) with a 3 ERA with 37 K's in 24 innings, a 13.88 K rate, a 1.88 Walk rate, leading to a 2.49 FIP.  They quickly bumped him to Daytona, where he was excellent, and by some accounts, dominant at times.  He went 2-0 with a 1.59 ERA with 3 starts and 4 appearances.  He had a 1.96 FIP, with 21 K's in 17 innings, a 11.12 K rate.  The one concern may be the walk rate jumping to 3.71, but that feels like something that could be tightened up, although it is worth watching.  Look, it's limited sample sizes, so hence the B-, but the upside is clearly there.  This is an excellent prospect who is going under the radar.  So ... why do I have him ahead of Cashner?  This is what it came down to me, an imaginary game, but a worthwhile one.  What is Jay Jackson if he is simply a pen arm?  After all, he needs that third pitch to develop to be a viable starter, so certainly, there's a chance that he's in the pen.  Well, if Jackson is in the pen, he likely profiles as a late inning arm that could potentially gun it in the mid-high 90's with a plus slider.  Sounds a lot like Cashner, eh?  Now, Cashner's 2 pitch arsenal is probably better (I'm projecting fastball velocity increase for Jay), but I don't think it is by much.  Pull back the lens a bit.  Almost everyone acknowledges that Cashner will be in the pen, with Jackson getting a shot to be in the rotation.  Is the slight difference in stuff more significant than the potential starting ability of Jackson?  For me, no.  Starting potential always gets a bonus in my book.  Yes, closing prospects, as I've said a few times, are underrated in the minors (pen arms, on the other hand, are  overrated), but starting value trumps for me.  I look for him to start in Daytona, and if things go well, he could be in Tennessee or Iowa by year's end.  He has TOR potential, so it'll be worth tracking Jay.  I'm rooting for it, because our system could use it, and our future could use an asset like him.

Stacking the B-'s:  As noted, starting potential wins out for me.  After that, Cashner seems like a safer bet than the others.  Flaherty is a bit less projection than Castillo, but Castillo plays a more valuable position, so that was close.  That said, gave the edge to Flaherty for now.  A potential plus glove, decent offense catcher shouldn't be underrated, though, and it was real close.  Rosa brings up the rear, as he's a corner projection that has a lot of work to do and a fair case can be made that I've overvalued him.

2.  Jeff Samardzija, P, B.

After further consideration, I downgraded Jeff Samardzija to a B.  Simply put, there's too much inconsistency, too much unknown at this juncture.  I think a lot of Cubs fans on other places have overstated his abilities right now.  While the upper 90's fastball, along with the split/slider/change arsenal shows potential, there's a lot of work to do in regards to consistency on his secondary offerings.  There's still some question as to whether or not he is a starter, although the Cubs will give him that chance.  As a starter, I think he feels more like a 2/3 type unless a lot of improvement occurs.  Personally, particularly considering our system pen depth, you try a guy as a starter until he can't, so I'd prefer to see Shark starting, but in AAA gaining experience and working on his arsenal.  That said, barring a stunner, he'll likely be in the bigs in some role, either as 5th starter or 7th inning type arm.  All this, though, shouldn't take away from the rapid advancement Samardzija has made.  For all the talk about Shark being a Hendry pick, he does fit Wilken's athletic profile with upside.  Shark wasn't all that great in AA, but part of that was due to a hiccup in May.  With a bit of luck in June, Shark's overall numbers improved, leading to a bump in AAA.  That said, even in AA, he wasn't missing enough bats.  In AAA, though, things took off a bit.  He wasn't as dominant as his overall line suggested, but for once, he was blowing people away with a bit more regularity, with his K rate jumping into the 9's.  The walk rate dropped into the high 3's, which was a nice sign, although he gave up too many long balls.  An improved AAA effort led him to get called up to the bigs, where he got off to a hot start before faltering in September.  The late season struggles may be a stamina issue.  One clear problem was still control, as even before September, he was walking too many.  Shark is a maddening situation to figure out - he flashes and oozes potential but is inconsistent.  Part of me feels like the quick bump to AA was fine, but I wonder if we rushed him this year, but I'll trust the staff seeing and feeling something.  I really, though, hope we add another starter so that we won't even think about trotting Shark out there as the 5th starter.

1.  Josh Vitters, 3rd, B+.

The one prospect with elite potential in our system, the most disappointing thing about Vitters so far is that he hasn't played a lot of full season ball, as he got hurt at Peoria and went back down.  That said, he's the one guy in our system that oozes superstar potential and has some power the system lacks.  BP compared him to Kendrick, with a bit more power, IIRC, and if so, that's an solid talent.  He was the NWL's top prospect this past year.  Reports late in the year suggested that his glove was improving at third, which is a positive sign as that's where he holds the most value for us.  The one thing that BA said that I loved was the fact that he hung in there on breaking balls, instead of flailing away, and Instructional League reports were good, indicating solid enough discipline at this stage.  The .328/.360/.498 line was solid in Boise, although one hopes a bit more power develops.  What I loved, though, was that hit streak (um was it 25 or 26 games), coupled with a K rate of only 17.4%.  You hope the walk rate rises as he gets up, as my guess is that the pitching was too easy for him.  Now ... as I am finishing this up, I feel like a cautionary note should be sounded.  If his power doesn't develop, then he loses some luster, particularly if he can't stick at 3rd.  I imagine he'll start 2009 in Peoria, with a shot at Daytona/Tennessee late.  There's a chance he's ready by 2011, in time to slide in an open corner IF spot with Lee moving on, but 2012 may be more realistic.

__________________________________

Well, there she is.  An attempt at 1-50.

Links to the Other two posts, as they will slowly be pushed off.

Old 15-35

Old 36-50

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 79 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Small adjustments

Let’s see, the Top 50, with some small adjustments and the Indians players added. Always contemplating. As noted, tried to balance out based on a variety of factors, readiness, upside, performance, fit, and so forth.

1. Josh Vitters, B+
2. Jeff Samardzija, B
3. Jay Jackson, B-
4. Andrew Cashner, B-
5. Ryan Flaherty, B-
6. Welington Castillo, B-
7. Jovan Rosa, B-
8. Tyler Colvin, C+
9. Starlin Castro, C+
10. Hak-Ju Lee, C+.

11. Jeff Stevens, RP, C+.

I had a tough time figuring out where to place him. Stevens was the arm the Indians received in that disastrous Brandon Phillips deal. He was actually decent as a starter in 2006 after joining Cleveland, going 7-3 with a 4.42 ERA in 16 appearances (15 starts) in Low A, with a 7 K rate and a 2 walk rate. Not bad. In 2007, the Indians shifted him to the pen, and he took off a bit. He still had his excellent control, and when he made the jump from High A to AA, his K rate climbed to the 12 range. 2008 saw more of the same, as he went 5-1 with a 2.51 ERA in 28.2 AA innings, with a 11.62 K rate. The walks, though, rose to a 3.45 rate. He moved to AAA, logging 29.2 innings with a 13.35 K rate, although the walk rate moved up some more, to 4.85. In 2007 and 2008, Stevens was on Team USA in the World Championships and the Olympics. He’s an intriguing late inning arm that has reportedly been more consistent in the mid-90’s while offering a good curve. An Indians prospect site suggests he has a cutter/change/slider as well. My biggest concern is that walk rate, which initially had me thinking of him in the 15-35 range. That said, is this a byproduct from trying out different pitches? The stuff is still there. At the end of the day, he’s ready, he’s a notch above Kevin Hart, and I can’t help but think that he’s a more advanced version of Dan McDaniel, a guy who could’ve been a starter but both were put in the pen to accelerate their development. Thus, after further consideration, I’m going with the 11 slot for him for now, and a C+. Another guy he feels like, to me, is Kevin Gregg, as you see Stevens effectiveness against lefties. If Stevens is with us, I’m thinking AAA and potential callup, as he’s on the 40 man.

12. Dan McDaniel, C+.
13. Mitch Atkins, C+.
14. Esmailin Caridad, C+.
15. Micah Hoffpauir, C+.
16. Dae-Eun Rhee*.
17. Kevin Hart.
18. Brandon Guyer.
19. Casey Coleman.
20. Junior Lake.
21. Aaron Shafer

22. Chris Carpenter.
23. Larry Suarez.

Another small change – Carpenter’s upside is still excellent and he’s more advanced than Suarez. Despite his poor start, I think Carpenter deserves the benefit of the doubt and the edge.

24. Tony Thomas
25. Casey Lambert
26. Rocky Roquet

27. Alessandro Maestri
28. James Russell
29. Justin Bristow
30. Nate Spears

Some more changes. The upside of the arms was too much for me to pass on in the end, so slid Spears down.

31. Jeremy Papelbon
32. Nate Samson
33. Matt Cerda
34. Jeff Antigua

Some wholesale changes from here on out.

35. Marquez Smith – I think, after further consideration, I was undervaluing him. Here’s a versatile talent with an intriguing bat. I wouldn’t mind seeing him used in RF if his bat develops.

37. Jake Fox
37. Darwin Barney
38. Jose Ascanio
39. Randy Wells – Slides down because, well, his value is his readiness and ability to be a long man. Not exactly assets that really scream out in value. Ascanio has a higher upside arm, Barney is at a more critical position, and Jake Fox still offers some pop.

40. John Gaub, LHP

My early feel on where to place Gaub puts him here. The former Golden Gopher, Gaub came out of college as a potential power lefty that, on occasion, showed a plus curve and change. He dropped in the 2006 draft, though, due to injury. 2008 was his first full season, only logging 4 innings in the regular season of 2007. Gaub was dominant in low A, with a 2.23 FIP in 64 innings, all relief appearances, with 100 K’s. That’s a 14.06 K rate. The 4.5 Walk rate is a bit troublesome. That said, take things with a grain of salt. Yes, he was injured, but he was still a college arm with a plus breaking ball. That racks up K’s in the minors. According to Tony Lastoria, Gaub throws in the low 90’s now, never regaining his collegiate velocity fully. The curve was scrapped for a slider, which has to be good to rack up those K’s, and he has a junk changeup. Gaub reminds you of guys like Casey Lambert and Rich Hill. The development of the change would make him a borderline starter, but the better bet is that he adds to our lefty minor league depth. Definite command issues, and Lastoria makes it sound liIf he ever gets his college velo, then he becomes really intriguing. If he stays with us, I imagine he’ll start 2009 off in High A Daytona as a pen arm, unless they try him as a starter again.

41. Brian Schlitter. I think I’m underrating the development of his slider. Offers more late inning potential than Parker or Latham.

42. Robert Hernandez. A lot of work, but still a potentially intriguing young starting caliber arm.

43. Marcos Mateo
44. Blake Parker – Am I overvaluing pen arms?
45. Jordan Latham – Am I overvaluing pen arms?
46. Drew Rundle
47. Dylan Johnston
48. Logan Watkins. Very raw, but showed some positive signs.

49. Chris Archer, P.

My initial gut feeling on where to place Archer finds him at the end of a top 50 list. Like Gaub, he was a 2006 pick, a guy that came out of HS with a plus curve. He’s got a good 6’3" frame that he may fill out a bit more. Lastoria suggests that the plus curve is still there, and that the fastball velo sits in the low-90’s, with room to grow. He’s still got work, and Lastoria suggests that delivery/mechanical issues may need to be addressed, along with the changeup’s development. If he can get his command under control, he could be an excellent rotation prospect in a few years. A high upside arm, if he’s in our organization, I think we’ll play it safe and start him at Peoria.

50. Nelson Perez. So much upside, so raw.

Off the list -

Josh Harrison – A tough bump, but akin to leaving a guy like Campana off, the question with Harrison is does he have the skillset to really dominate? I mean, Campana has the elite speed. Harrison’s a baller, for lack of a better word, a tough, scrappy player, but he’s far away and he’s more Ryan Theriot-mold than, say, a Brian Roberts mold.

Greg Reinhard, Hung-Wen Chen – Fringe rotation arms that don’t look to be anything more than middle relief options.

I’m wondering if Fox and Wells need to be dumped.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 3:31 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

to expand on my last post

I mean, Fox, nice player, but if he makes it to the bigs, he’s a backup 1st/corner OF bench bat with some pop. There’s probably as good a chance that he’s a career minor league type. Wells, useful and I gave him bonus points on readiness, but he’s an arm that gets phased out once better guys come along.

That said, I do try to balance things, and Fox/Wells should get some points for their readiness. And a bigger part of the problem, a problem that led to some guys (like Harrison/Campana/Leverton and others previously named) being left off is that, there’s a lot of pen depth that looks capable and it was hard for me to pass some of them up due to their performance.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 3:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd agree on Fox's potential

His biggest problem seems to have been pitch recognition (Brenly skewered him on this two years ago), and he appeared to slowly figure things out last year. If he can continue to improve his plate discipline, he could be a decent bench part, backing up at 3 different positions (LF, RF, 1B) and serving as an emergency catcher, too.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 1, 2009 9:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Fox will be 27 in July.

He’s a poor man’s Hoffpauir.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 1, 2009 9:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I think I'd rather have Fox on the bench than Hoffpauir

I don’t think he’d hurt the team quite as much defensively.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 2, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Micah's a fine defensive first baseman

I’d say they are about equal in the OF. Fox does have the added bonus of being an emergency catching option, but put it this way – if you are using your third catcher in a game, that’s usually not a good sign.

by toonsterwu on Jan 2, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd agree

I wouldn’t want to see Fox catching, but I think he’s a little more versatile than Hoffpauir. Just one man’s opinion.

Watching Hoffpauir kick around the ball when he played first in September was scary for me. I know one game doesn’t make the player, but he struggled over there at times.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 2, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I to

drool at Jay Jackson’s potential. And Aaron Shinshano’s article on Hak-ju Lee was very intriguing. I hope they give Shark a chance to start this year and don’t give up on him to easily.

Thanks for the lists they are very interesting and I am sure they took some time to put together. It’s nice to see this kind of quality and time put into a post.

by nick_reny on Jan 1, 2009 3:32 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks

I like following our system, but as I always acknowledge, just a fan. I had fun coming up with this list, though.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 3:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Wish I could see some #s on Hak-Ju

I find it hard to figure out how good this kid is without seeing any type of stats to support it

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Jan 1, 2009 5:43 AM CST reply actions  

same here

I know a lot of people are gung ho over him, and I know the scouting report oozes upside, but I’m just wary until something happens.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Samardzija/Rosa/Hendry

You were right when you said that Samardzija fit the scouting directors criteria, because in an article when they announced the signing of Samardzija, Hendry said that Samardzija was number 1 on the scouting directors list. in the Tribune.
Rosa along with Latham and Samson (drafted at the time because he was signed to go to Daytona Beach cc) we’re all drafted as DNF’s which was pretty astute at that time because it was the last yr of the DNF. I’m like you in one sense that Rosa has good potential, but reading into this I dont think his 3rd base days are done yet. I was reading in an article that Rosa hands are good and he’s got plus arm strength, its all in his footwork and the fact that he’s really grown since he signed from 195 lbs to about 220/225 and still putting his body control together on a 6’4/6’5 frame and the fact that he played all yr as a 20 yr old in Peoria.

by Slamdog on Jan 1, 2009 7:48 AM CST reply actions  

With Vitters and Smith

in the A ball ranks, I think Rosa’s days at 3rd are slowly ending. Does he have the physical potential? Sure, but I just don’t see the opportunity being there. Maybe I’m wrong, though.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 9:09 AM CST up reply actions  

I should add

I could see Rosa staying at third a bit longer if Vitters needs more time at Peoria and if Marquez gets bumped to AA.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Very nicely done

Thanks. I agree on Archer. I see some upside potential there as well. Probably the highest upside of the three pitchers. Not sure what to make of yesterday’s moves until the rest of the off-season plays out but I’ll keep an eye on Archer assuming we keep him.

by rlpete on Jan 1, 2009 8:05 AM CST reply actions  

if gaub gets his collegiate

mid-90’s velo back, I’d be very intrigued.

I didn’t like yesterday’s trade, more because we have to wait and see what the next move is, as those three don’t appreciably add much to a win-now agenda. Gotta wait and see what’s next. That said, those three guys have some talent and value, so not liking the trade doesn’t diminish from their capabilities. They are three intriguing arms.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Jose Ceda

Approximately, where would you have ranked Jose Ceda, if he was still with us?

(P.S. Thanks for all the hard work.)

by Ghost of Fred Merkle on Jan 1, 2009 8:39 AM CST reply actions  

For me, 3rd

Solid B, third. Elite stuff, improved mechanics, improved control, good performance at AA, as Jackson and Cashner still have to reach AA first, so Ceda would’ve gotten the edge.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Donaldson

Same with Donaldson please?

by Slamdog on Jan 1, 2009 8:45 AM CST reply actions  

now that one is harder to figure out

There were reports all year that he was striking the ball good, just not making enough contact. If we assume that his offensive improvement in Oakland would’ve occurred with us (and not the fairest assumptions, but let’s assume), and you add in the improved glove behind the plate which gives some hope on his ability to stick behind the plate (although most still anticipate he’ll go to first), I think it’s an easy top 15 in our system. I can’t see B-, so that means C+, and my initial hunch would be that I would’ve placed him 8th, but that’s buying increased hope he can stick behind the dish. That’s me, though, and if you think that the receiving improvements were overstated, Josh would get slid down a bit, perhaps to 11?

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Great work

thanks for putting in the time on this. It’d be great if Jackson realizes his potential – regardless of whether he’s in the bullpen or starting, the organization does seem to have some intriguing power arms.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 1, 2009 9:40 AM CST reply actions  

I think it is critical that a SP

reaches their potential in the next couple years, whether it’s Carpenter, Jackson, Coleman, Shafer, or whomever. Lilly hits FA soon, it’s not like Z/Dempster/Harden are pictures of health, and Harden is a FA soon as well. We need to develop these arms to bridge to the next generation without having to ridiculously overpay on things in the future.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice work!

Thanks for the thorough and insightful top fifty list. Your knowledge of prospects is impressive to say the least. I’m glad you decided to post this here and give us links to other resources as well. I’m just starting to appreciate the importance, as a fan, of paying attention to the prospects. This, and Josh’s work really helps.

"Baseball is like church- many attend, few understand." ~ Leo Durocher

by The Lip on Jan 1, 2009 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Good stuff

I may have to start championing Randy Wells. I think he has more potential than, say, Michael Wuertz did when he first got called up, even though Wuertz had the stronger out pitch. I’d like to see Wells in the back end of the bullpen this year.

Fontenot (fon-te-no): Cajun for "scrappy"

by cubzfan on Jan 1, 2009 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

wells

could have more use, as a guy who is asked to mop up games, long man, spot start, and so forth, but I think if Wuertz’s slider is on, he’s more valuable. I think Wells is the type of guy that goes up and down during his option years. Only time will tell.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks 'Toons' an excellent piece of work

Now let us place this in context (win now) as I would if I were a executive (suite) not baseball guy I would ask the following question:

Who will have the most potential impact this year? Then I would subdivide the question as to who will bring the most resources to win now and who do we keep regardless.

To me Hoffpauir offers immediate potential as a 26th man on the roster who can be there to back up DLee (in case of injury) but also be there to fill the spot in case of the expected DL stints regarding the expected Bradley signing. (I look at Bradley like Floyd in ‘07, probably getting 100-120 game appearances and 275-300 AB’s in 80 GS’s.) Therefore there will be between 50-60 games Hoffpauir can be used like Ward in ‘07-’08.

Naturally Samardz I think is out of the prospect hole and is on the MLB roster unless he degrades in spring training, unless the Cubs do indeed acquire Peavy which then leaves Harden’s spot to be open in ’09 for a competition.

Thus the only other players on the immediate radar are Caridad and Atkins who might help in an injury pinch this year.

As for the only player I then see as a DO NOT TRADE is Vitters who could be a difference maker and a financial plum as Ramirez’s contract matures in 2010 where the Cubs must make an expensive option decision in 2011. Now if Vitters is traded they must get a All Star in return (Peavy) and the player that places them in the WS.

The other ones appear to be grinders.

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Jan 1, 2009 11:34 AM CST reply actions  

thanks

couple comments -

Hoffpauir a 26th man? You don’t think he’ll be on the 25 man? i’m assuming that’s probably a typo.

Samardzija was still rookie eligible and hence why I included him.

I think Nate Spears could see time, if something catastrophic happens, and I think guys like Casey Lambert, Jeremy Papelbon, and some righty arms like Roquet and Cashner could also see time if there are bp issues.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

not so sure

Miles is not a true SS back up, he is a game situation who can play an inning or two in a pinch at SS, I could be wrong of course and thus Hoffpauir fits. Actually I would like him to be there since he is a big bat off the bench and could spot DLee May-August once a week and possibly give DLee some pop back.

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Jan 1, 2009 6:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for this.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 1, 2009 11:59 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks and next years list.

Once again thank you with the list, I’m sure you spent alot of time on this. Next your not nuts for considering Parker and Latham because setup relievers even thou a dime a dozen are very important and these pitcherss have good value as far as thats concerned and with that thought in mind here a few players/pitchers to keep in mind.
Pitchers, Julio Pena, Hatley, Searle, Leverton, Beliveau (had more swings and misses on his pitches than anyone in short season ball last yr) Blackford, Camp, Clevenger, Aducci and speaking of setups types that converted Muyco and Sommer and possibly late next yr to watch for Kyler Burke if he doesnt hit to go to the mound.

by Slamdog on Jan 1, 2009 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

two guys I sorta regret passing on

are leverton and beliveau, but beliveau’s control had me a bit shaky.

My issue with Adduci is that he’s Matt Murton … with perhaps less power.

The catcher I’m watching is Carlos Perez. He’s got some tools to work with.

I think some other random arms off the top would be Redmond, Yohan Gonzalez, Dionis Nunez. I want to see if Kreier can physically mature a bit more and add a bit more juice.

There’s a whole bevy of names that really could fit into the 31-50 range.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

With that said!

It looks like our depth could be above avg with lack of higher ceiling players but quite a bit of depth of players and pitching.

by Slamdog on Jan 1, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I really do hope that Vitters stays in the CUBS' system

Would be nice to have a home-grown, future superstar (a stretch, but crossing my fingers) in the next couple of years. Who is the last near star player the CUBS’ system has produced (aside from hopefully Soto)….Mark Grace?

PHISH IS BACK!!!
HAMPTON, VA - MARCH 6, 7 and 8th!!!!

by TheBeerBaron on Jan 1, 2009 4:53 PM CST reply actions  

toonsterwu

I am interested in what you think our lineup and rotation will look like in the future, lets say 2011-12ish.

by nick_reny on Jan 1, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions  

Very interesting read! (Rec'd)

Both this comment and your overall list. This is why I think it’s important for every (serious) Cubs fan to at least make some effort to familiarize him- or herself with the minor league system. If I might dare coin a phrase, “To know the farm is to know the future.” Not the exact future, of course, but an inkling thereof. Thanks again.

Yes, yes ... winter is indeed a pond upon which all of us must skate, braving frostbite and runny noses in the hopes that our cars will start and we shan't embarass ourselves slipping on a patch of black ice. Spring is more a quagmire of cold mud and slush, and fall is a pile of fallen leaves that may or may not hide a pile of doggy doo-doo. But summer, ah summer is an oasis of endless green that disappears all too quickly beneath our feet as we rush through its warm, glorious bliss.

by daver on Jan 2, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Much depends on how far the economics effect baseball economies

2011 I see that this club has either made it to the WS or not in 2009 and 2010.

First some assumptions: DLee is gone to FA, but Ramirez seeing the diminishing economics takes the option knowing he has $19M and the Cubs move him to 1B.

Fukudome is in his last year after having two ever better years.

Cubs put Colvin in CF, Soriano in LF.

Soto is a mainstay at Catcher and if Vitters is still here, he is at 3B with Hak-ju Lee at SS, the 2B is someone unknown on the horizon.

SP’g: We still have Zambrano, Dempster, Samardz, Cashner or Jackson and an unknown.
RP; Marmol is a mainstay but outside of Guzman everyone is new.

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Jan 1, 2009 6:27 PM CST reply actions  

2012 Soto is moved to 1B

Castillo takes over catching, Colvin is moved to RF and Cubs acquire a CF’er, trade Zambrano and Dempster and go with youth, youth and youth.

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Jan 1, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

NIce work Toons

This is the reason this site is always a great read.
 Interesting to see the Peavy watch, because most likely Vitters will be in the deal, and then it will be years of what if…
 The key to me is Jackson, Cashner and Adkins, if they can become majors ready in two years it will help the finances of this club and future moves.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Jan 1, 2009 8:32 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks

Much as I pull for Atkins, I don’t think he’s all that critical. We’ll have end of the rotation guys come up that can replace him.

Some keys for me:

1) Josh Vitters being able to stick at 3rd. You can find first basemen with relative ease, so if Rosa and others bust, it’s not a huge deal. We all know how long it took us to find Aramis – let’s hope Vitters can stick at 3rd.

2) Development of a couple starting caliber arms. It could be Jay Jackson and Jeff Samardzija. Or it could be Casey Coleman, Justin Bristow, Chris Carpenter, or others. We need something to ease the financial burdens, and the rotation is the spot where contracts will clear up in the near future (Harden/Lilly) so having ready replacements is necessary.

3) Continued “Cup of Tea” development. Sure, I’d like Flaherty and Castro and so forth to develop. Hopefully they will. But we are a big market team, so we have financial power. Even if new ownership cuts back (hypothetical), we should still be better than many other orgs in terms of financial power. Thus, having “cup of tea” guys develop is critical. That is, bench players, bullpen, end of rotation guys. Save money on those assets and it opens up our capability to land impact talent in the market if need be.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice work

But man o’ man is the Cub system in lousy shape. To be very honest the only three names on that top 15 who I think are really worth talking about are Jackson, Cashner and Sarmardzija. And even with the Shark I’m afraid the hype overwhelms the actual impact he will ever have in the big leagues. I’m just not sold on him being anything more than a middle reliever, but we’ll see.

I can’t comment on Josh Vitters (and neither can anybody else) until this kid actually logs time in low A ball. Enormously difficult to project anything on Vitters right now.

by BLou on Jan 1, 2009 8:43 PM CST reply actions  

Agreed...

That said, nobody was at all high on Soto until he had that huge 2007. That’s not to say we should expect that sort of emergence to happen again (it was a shocking turn of events). But that’s one of the few glimmers of hope. There is little above A ball that looks exciting right now. We’re going to need to have a very high hit rate among those lower level prospects to make up for it.

by SouthernCub on Jan 2, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Any thoughts on Brad Snyder?

I believe the Cubs picked him up from Cleveland. He’s on our 40-man – thoughts?

by socalicubsfan on Jan 1, 2009 10:25 PM CST reply actions  

snyder

is very toolsy, but just never learned how to handle the zone and be a good hitter. There’s still a chance that he turns it around late, and certainly, you can make a case for him to be in that 30-50 range. I just think he’s filler that will be gone.

by toonsterwu on Jan 1, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Trying to do Sleepers

Before this thread disappears. So, my first one would be at catcher.

Our system catching depth is better than people give it credit for. Sure, there’s stopgaps in AAA, but eh, there’s stopgaps for most AAA teams. Castillo likely starts at AA, where, if he can go from a good to great defensive catcher, and improve his offense, he’ll rocket up the charts. Steve Clevenger likely starts at High A. There’s a chance the Cubs waste him quite a bit at 1st again, but if he’s catching, the hope is to improve his receiving abilities to the point where his lefty bat becomes somewhat intirguing. If Luis Flores can hit even a tiny bit, and he has some pop, he could be a potential backup backstop in the pros as his defensive abilities are rock solid. I hope Bob imparts some wisdom and ability on Michael, who shows some potential. There’s a couple kids in DSL that looked intriguing, but as noted, I don’t know enough. Blake Lalli is a personal favorite, a guy whose receiving skills are below average, but if his bat plays, has a shot. If someone wanted to name Lalli, Clevenger, Flores, Brenly as sleepers, I’d buy it.

That said, my first sleeper is Carlos Perez. At a sturdy 6 feet, 200 plus pounds, Perez, a righty who won’t turn 22 until after the 09 campaign, has solid tools. He might just be a better defensive receiver than Castillo or Flores (it’s probably close, and Flores probably is a better game caller from what I understand). There’s some pop in Carlos’ frame as well, but it might take time for it to materialize. He shows passable discipline. He’s coming off a decent season in Boise, posting a .280/.337/.366 line. Consistency with his swing and overall development could make Carlos Perez a guy to watch in 2009. He’ll likely start in Peoria, so I’d caution against reading too much into the numbers, as the MWL isn’t a friendly hitting environment.

by toonsterwu on Jan 2, 2009 12:54 PM CST reply actions  

a note

one thing about carlos is that he hits righties far better than lefties. if he can balance it out a bit, that would improve his performance. and i haven’t heard of any reason why that wouldn’t get balanced out a bit as he moves up.

by toonsterwu on Jan 2, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

well color me wrong

Fleita suggests that Castillo will start at AAA. Why did we sign Mark Johnson, to go with Koyie Hill, and bring Bako in if Castillo is going to occupy a AAA spot and demand time? I thought the idea of signing those two, along with Hill, Richie, and Robinson, was to give Castillo more time.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

First Base

This is either a position that’s set, if you think Vitters will move to first, or a position with a lot of question marks. In AAA, we’ll likely be trotting out some sort of fringe prospect, perhaps Jake Fox. A useful asset that might be a guy who fills a 13th man off the bench role, or a AAA anchor. In AA, we’ll likely see Russ Canzler. He had a strong 2nd half, so it is worth watching, but that said, he’s still likely a fringe prospect. At Daytona, we’ll likely see Jovan Rosa handling some of the first base duties. He is definitely someone to watch for me, so hard to claim he’s a sleeper. Steve Clevenger may see some time at first. Ryan Keedy will see some time at Peoria, and he has a “magic wand” (saw that in a report somewhere, will look for it later). He’s in that Lyle Overbay/Mark Grace mold if he makes it up, a guy who will make contact but limited power.

My sleeper/breakout will be a well known name, though. Rebel Ridling was our 25th round pick from Oklahoma State. He’s a big, strapping guy, 6’4" 230 who will be 23 early in the 2009 campaign. He can play some OF, and with Keedy likely there as well, both Rebel and Ryan may see some time in LF (along with the likely 2nd base tandem of Harrison/Opitz). While Keedy was the higher draft pick, his questionable power makes me wonder if he can make this up. Rebel had a hot 71 AB’s in Boise that led to him moving up to Peoria. There, he ran into some problems, some bad luck, but a 30% K rate is just bad. He needs to cut down on those K’s. But he offers power that is lacking in the system, and one hopes that with more time with wooden bats, the Rebel (and what a great name) might be able to make his move up through tightening up his swing a bit and dropping that K rate. Of course, he could turn out to be Ryan Norwood.
_______________________________

There are some guys in the lower levels, like a Jericho Jones/Nelson Perez that could handle some first base duties, as first base can be a dumping ground. Two other guys to mention would be Blake Lalli and Luis Bautista. Age is an overrated thing, but it does play a role, as both of these guys will be old for their level, which isn’t really fair to them as it isn’t like they have been languishing in the system as both were college guys. Lalli can handle it behind the plate a bit more than Luis, and Blake could be perhaps utilized in the OF as well, along with first. Both have bats that have played so far, showing some pop and contact ability, along with perhaps a tad more power that could be unlocked. My question is, though, whether either will get enough PT anywhere to let their bat grow. Now, if Marquez Smith gets bumped to AA, then maybe Rosa goes back to third and Luis gets regular time at first. If not, where’s Luis getting his AB’s at. As for Lalli, he likely won’t beat out Castillo for the regular catching duties, so he might have to wait until Castillo moves up. Can he squeeze Canzler out at first, or force his way into the OF?

by toonsterwu on Jan 2, 2009 1:48 PM CST reply actions  

First off- Thanks for the info Toonster! It is quite detailed!

I do want to disagree with your “Age is overrated” comment above though. To me it is underrated if anything. It is exactly the reason there is little excitement about guys like Bautista and Jerricho Jones. Guys like these that are 21-23 years old but playing in a league mostly filled with 18 year olds and this is a HUGE advantage for them. They should absolutely dominate and even if they do what does that tell you? Guys like them need to jump a level or two this season to become real prospects.

Age again is I am so high on Castillo (since he was at AA at age 22- when most guys are 24 at that level). Holding his own at that age at a higher level is much better than dominating a lower level. It is also why I think D E Rhee should have been higher than #16 on the list. He dominated at mid A ball as a 19 year old (a level where the avg age is 21+). Thus, even if he loses a year he comes back and is still young for that level. Plus- he had TJ surgery- which most guys recover from just fine. If he had shoulder surgery that would cause concern. I for one am excited to see what he does.

by CA Cub Fan on Jan 2, 2009 5:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I should've been clearer on the age comment

I didn’t mean age was over or underrated, but rather that judging on age alone is a bit overrated without looking at the broad spectrum. If you look at Blake Lalli’s age, one would assume he’s some sort of career minor leaguer. He very well may be … but he is only entering his 3rd season, so to be at AA is rather solid progression as long as he keeps producing. For a guy like Lalli, his bat has played well, and there are signs of some more power perhaps.

As for Dae-Eun Rhee, I think it’s a matter, for me, that he didn’t have a huge sample size, he didn’t last too long per outing, and the surgery. Yes, TJ surgery isn’t a big concern these days, but it still is a surgery, so let’s see how he rebounds first. I can buy Rhee as high as 9, though.

by toonsterwu on Jan 2, 2009 6:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Few guys I missed

Well, I sorta got Luis Bautista, who I expect at Daytona (Lalli at Tennessee).

And Lalli is actually on his third overall season. I meant to say last year was his 2nd full season.

But Sean Hoorelbeke was the former Chippewas slugging first baseman that showed some discipline. Let’s watch the power development, as that could make him a legit guy to watch. That said, with a lot of OF/1st options in that range, he’ll really have to emerge.

Bryan Jost probably doesn’t have the power to really push forward much, not when a better contact hitter is ahead of him in Ryan Keedy.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 11:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough.

Thanks again!

I am awaiting delivery of my BA prospects book and will be interested to see how they compare to your list.

by CA Cub Fan on Jan 3, 2009 12:46 AM CST reply actions  

2nd base

Is arguably the deepest position in the system. At AAA, we’ll see a decent-capable Nate Spears, a guy who looks like a potential utility infielder in the bigs, but with our infield depth, that may be with another organization in the future. In AA, we’ll see Tony Thomas, a guy who still has offensive potential to intrigue, but has to take a step forward. Daytona is a tough call right now. We could see Nate Samson or Ryan Flaherty. Maybe they slow play Flaherty and leave Samson at short. If that happens, we could perhaps see Josh Harrison. Down in Peoria, there’s a chance we see Harrison. Junior Lake or Dwayne Kemp could figure in the mix. There’s some util options in the mix.

Sleeper/Breakout Candidate: Jake Opitz.

I was a huge fan of our 12th round selection from Nebraska. Sure, the last Nebraska infielder didn’t turn out as well after being borderline intriguing out of college. That said, hey, potential always offers intrigue, and in Opitz’s case, we have a potential lefty 2nd baseman that is a solid glove with some potential for plus positional power. What’s not to like. Okay, so what is the problem?

a) Josh Harrison – Fellow 08 pick is likely to see time in Peoria, which is where Opitz likely goes.

b) Ryan Flaherty – Lefty is likely headed for 2nd base, meaning Opitz is behind in the pecking order

c) Junior Lake – Young stud that oozes potential is pushing behind Opitz.

That said, he could see some LF time this year as well, and as long as he gets enough AB’s, I think he could make a push.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 12:40 PM CST reply actions  

2nd base is treated as the "least important" position on the field by teams

Sure, it’s great if you happen to have a Ryne Sandberg, Robbie Alomar or Chase Utley. But for the majority of organizations 2nd base is the position they lose the least amount of sleep over. And it is the position where most teams try to keep a financial cap on. You can always find a 2nd baseman. Guys like Mark Grudzielanek, Ray Durham and Placido Polanco are always available, usually quite reasonably. Hence why three guys like that have carved out long major league careers.

by BLou on Jan 3, 2009 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

forgot about

Vincent Watkins, who should see time at 2nd in perhaps a XST/Boise route. He’ll also get OF time as well.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 8:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Shortstop

I guess this has shifted from a sleeper/breakout thing to more of a positional overview within the system that somewhat covers the potential outlook of each full-seasonminor league club. Maybe I should’ve made all this a separate post?

Anyhow, shortstop is a system where we finally have some excitement, but it should be tempered by the fact that those two kids are so young. At AAA, we are likely to go with a retread type, with Andres Blanco likely the option. Nate Spears may see some time at short if we envision him as a future utility player in the bigs, to help him get his feet wet. At AA, we’ll have the superbly athletic Darwin Barney, but the superbly questionable bat of his as well. He has a shot, though, of being a utility guy in the bigs as long as he can hit for anything above the mendoza line. Think somewhat Chin-lung Hu of the Dodgers, although he probably isn’t as good as Hu defensively. Peoria is a tougher guess. We could go with Flaherty at short, if we opt to give him another look there. Jake Opitz or Josh Harrison could spot there, perhaps. Marwin Gonzalez might see some time there. The best guess is that, if he doesn’t start in Peoria, Starlin Castro has a chance to be there real soon. If we go lower down, XST/Boise could have Lake/Ju, with Lake having an outside shot at Peoria before midseason perhaps. AZL is tough to figure at this point in time.

Sleeper/Breakout Guess: Nate Samson.

This one falls more into the category of sleeper than breakout, as Nate Samson had a solid 2008 campaign in Boise. As noted, Samson may not stick at short. He may be more of a utility guy in the long haul. That said, with the way the Cubs system stacks up, I think he’ll get an extra look, and there’s enough hope that he can be a Ryan Theriot-level defensive player at the position (which is meant only to say that there’s an outside chance Samson sticks). That said, Nate is coming off an excellent offensive season in the tough Midwest League, posting a solid .298/.368/.359 line with a solid 50/39 K/BB in 490 AB’s. Along with Jovan Rosa, Samson helped anchor that Peoria offense. He struggled in May and August, with the August struggles perhaps fatigue related. He did see 9 AB’s in AAA. Samson had a power spike in June and July, and considering his body has some room for growth/physical maturation, a bit more power can be expected. Any increase in power makes him exponentially more intriguing. He’s one of those guys that likely won’t ever be great, but could surprise a lot of folks as he moves up the ladder.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 2:46 PM CST reply actions  

A guy I forgot

would be Matt Camp, who is sort of a jack of all trades in terms of playing MI and some OF. Think Aaron Miles, sorta. He’ll get some AA and AAA time, in all likelihood. I’d prefer to see him get AB’s in AAA, with Thomas/Barney eating time in AA, and sending him down to High A would let him run into Flaherty/Samson perhaps. At AAA, he could get more AB’s as a 3 man rotation in the MI perhaps (Blanco/Spears the other two) and perhaps in CF. He’s a slap hitting, ground ball type with good discipline. Fringe shot at the bigs, perhaps, but if he does make it up, probably as a utility option.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 7:56 PM CST up reply actions  

3rd base

I’m really not sure how third base shakes out. Josh Lansford has started throwing as a pitcher, and Casey McGehee is out. On paper, AAA is open. They may bump Kyle Reynolds up, Matt Camp could see some time, maybe we bring back Matt Craig (I think he’s a minor league FA), or we sign a minor league journeyman. At AA, that’s a mixed bag as well. Kyle Reynolds could be plugged in here, Matt Matulia and Jon Mota may get some looks, and maybe Matt Camp is a thought here. I imagine that we’ll see a minor league FA signing at one of these spots … not sure where. It’s a tad early to bump Marquez Smith … I think, unless he has a strong spring. We see some depth in the lower levels. At Daytona, we’ll likely see Marquez Smith and Jovan Rosa as the main options, with Rosa perhaps getting time at 1st, and with Smith perhaps getting time at 2nd and maybe the OF? At Peoria, everyone is waiting on Josh Vitters, and he’ll probably be there unless they feel confident about him moving up to Daytona as a 3rd baseman. The org wants him to succeed at 3rd, as that’s where his value is. We could perhaps see Harrison/Opitz spot at third at times, perhaps Kemp?, maybe Flaherty if they think he can gain overall plus power (right now, he’s more solid power, which is a plus for 2nd), Junior Lake perhaps. John Contreras is a fringe corner IF talent, as of now, who likely goes the XST/Boise route this year.

Sleeper/Breakout: Marwin Gonzalez.

Okay, I’m stretching a bit … but I’m trying to avoid top talents unless I truly think they will explode through this year, and I think Smith can be okay, but I don’t know if I expect him to dominate, and I think Vitters may go through some struggles in Peoria, but in the end, I expect Josh to be fine and move to Daytona at some point. Gonzalez is a long, lean guy who has some athletic tools and his body is still filling out. Only going to be 20 next year, he slapped his way to a .278/.317/.363 line. He’ll see time at 2nd, short, and perhaps the OF, and if he makes it up, it’s more as a util option. But I could see his bat taking a step forward this year, although it may not show in the numbers (as I expect him at Peoria).

Btw, these lists aren’t meant to be all-inclusive of every single guy in the system. There will be times I miss someone.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 8:06 PM CST reply actions  

Josh Kroeger

I missed this, but Josh Kroeger signed with the White Sox a month ago.

I expected him to sign elsewhere, but the White Sox? That’s annoying, even though I don’t hate the White Sox.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 9:39 PM CST reply actions  

Outfielders

This, and pitchers, are more crapshoot of sorts, as there’s just too many players and a myriad of possibilities that could happen. The following will simply be my best guess at key players. I am making the assumption that Felix Pie will be gone.

AAA – The first assumption on my list is that the two OF backups are set in the bigs – Reed Johnson and Joey Gathright. Thus, I think we will see some Brad Snyder in Iowa, where the friendly environments of the PCL could lead to some power, although he needs to improve that K-zone judgment. Jake Fox may see some time out there. I expect Sam Fuld to be in Iowa’s CF again. At some point in the season, Colvin may get a look here, but he won’t be here until summer, in all likelihood. Matt Camp may see some OF time as well. I expect a minor league FA or two to be signed. Unfortunately, Josh Kroeger is gone. Doug Deeds and Jason Dubois are FA’s, along with Andres Torres. It’s possible 1, if not both, return, as they’d have a prominent role anchoring the AAA offense in the middle, which may be enough incentive (as guys like them are simply looking for the best opportunity to showcase themselves, and Dubois needs the PCL … if one or both come back, expect them to see time at first as well). If I had to guess a starting trio at the start of the year, I’d guess Snyder, Fuld, and FA at the start of the year.

AA – This one is tougher to figure out. At some point, Tyler Colvin will be here again, but Fleita had previously indicated that he’d start in High A. Ryan Harvey may get some time as well, if he’s still in the organization (could be cut in spring). Ty Wright is likely to move up the ladder. Camp and Matulia could see AA OF time if they are there. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Blake Lalli perhaps tried out in the OF a bit if he is there. James Adduci is likely to be there. If I had to guess a starting trio at the start of the year, I’ll go with Wright/Adduci/Harvey. If Flaherty emerges quick, and forces a AA promotion (assuming Flaherty starts at Daytona), then Thomas may be moved to OF potentially.

High A – It’s possible they jump Jon Wyatt to AA, as others have speculated about, but I imagine they’ll go Wyatt back to Daytona, where he’ll perhaps start the year there. That said, I think CF will belong to Brandon Guyer, as I think the Cubs will try this experiment. LF should be Dylan Johnston at the outset, the former SS turned bulked up, slugging LF. I’ve speculated on Marquez Smith perhaps getting OF looks at some point. If I had to take an OF guess right now, I’d go Wyatt in LF, Guyer in CF, Johnston in RF, but they may flip Guyer to a corner and give Wyatt CF. Colvin is rumored to perhaps be going here when things start, the nice warm weather and all, so if he’s there, you could see some different configurations.

Low A Peoria is a tough one to figure out at this juncture. As I’ve noted Opitz/Harrison/Keedy/Ridling could all see some OF AB’s throughout the year. Drew Rundle will get another go around here, and at some point, he’s got to produce. I think Tony Campana might have CF rights here. Other guys that could figure in: Cliff Andersen (former overslot has struggled to put bat on ball), Kurt Calvert, David Macias, Ryan Sontag, Jericho Jones, and Kyler Burke could all figure in. Some of those, due to a clogged roster, will likely be at XST for a bit until movement starts to happen. If I had to guess a starting OF at the top of the year, I’d go Campana in CF, Rundle in LF and Burke in RF, but for Drew and Kyler, it’s put up time. Like Rundle, Burke showed some signs of life in the summertime at Boise.

I’ve somewhat listed some XST possibilities already. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Dwayne Kemp perhaps get some OF looks. The uber-toolsy Nelson Perez is probably on an XST-Boise route for 2009. A young guy to watch would be Kevin Soto, who has some tools to work with. If Jesus Morelli gets brought over from DSL or Albert Hernandez, they would be two guys to perhaps keep a little attention to at XST. Watkins is a guy who should get some OF time in XST, and is likely on XST-Boise this year. Wouldn’t stun me if Lake got some OF time as well. One other name to toss in the mix is Sean Hoorelbeke, the Central Michigan Chippewas former 1st baseman who offers some power potential and decent discipline.

Sleeper Candidate:

I’ll go three deep.

Tony Campana – The 401st pick in the 13th round, out of Cincinnati, is, like former Bearcat teammate Josh Harrison, an undersized, top of the order type player. He got hurt at Boise last year, and thus, spent most of the season at Arizona after he got healthy, but as a college bat, he could go to fullseason ball potentially (and a senior to boot). Unlike Harrison, Campana is more of a slap hitter, as Harrison will lift the ball a bit more (Harrison, for a comp, is somewhat like Mike Fontenot in some regards, or at least, I think of them in somewhat similar regards). Campana scouting reports indicated that he’s a hard worker, and supposedly, his swing has shortened, which should help him out. He has one huge difference, though, from Harrison, and that is, Campana has elite speed. He’s often compared to Juan Pierre, which isn’t the worst thing when you factor in how few guys reach the bigs. He’s got decent discipline and obviously has the range, although he’s like Pierre and Damon in the arm regard. I can see Campana, if he starts in A ball, perhaps doing real well and perhaps threatening as an option in Tennessee by the summertime BUT I think, unless he gets a bit more lift on his balls, his ML future, IF he gets there, is as a 4th OF type that offers pinch running help.

Jericho Jones – This comes with the caveat that he has to get the AB’s. The 20th round, 611th overall pick from Louisiana Tech, Jericho really caught a lot of hype in the summertime due to strong numbers in AZL, but he’s not a finished product. His AZL numbers were boosted by a nice stretch in the middle. Like a lot of Wilken draft picks, he was a two way guy who flashed solid pitching potential, but the Cubs wanted his power bat, as the system was lacking in it. His body can get bigger, though, so there’s a lot of untapped potential. For a potential power hitter, he did hit a high percentage of ground balls in AZL, so it’s worth watching how he smooths out his swing. He’s got decent speed and a strong arm, so there’s tools.

Sean Hoorelbeke – I don’t know why the Chippewas former first baseman doesn’t get a bit more attention. I’m at fault as well, as I completely forgot about him until doing this. The 33rd round pick is a solidly built 6’1" 220ish guy who comes from good genetic stock (cousins are in the Dodgers organization). He’s displayed decent discipline (38/23 K/BB at Boise in 128 AB’s). The fact that he was bumped up was a bit telling, when guys like Perez and Jones were hammering the ball, but showing bigger flaws. Hoorelbeke doesn’t have the ceiling of either of those guys, but he still has decent potential. Like Ryan Keedy, he is a bit more gap power than HR power right now, and his body is probably close to maxed out, so watching his power development will be key, but unlike Jones, his swing is better and he lifts the ball a bit more consistently than Jericho.

  • Note: I know I picked 3 lower level guys, and here’s the thing – I also know that the chances of all three getting enough AB’s may be slim. So … am I somewhat hedging my bets? Perhaps!

Breakout Candidate: Brandon Guyer

The difference between Guyer and Colvin? Well, outside of the handedness, it’s the round and the power … as Colvin has the round, but Guyer has the power. Okay, it’s not that simple, but my point is, Guyer is somewhat lost in the mix at times, despite being a relatively high pick. Yes, I know, he’s top 20 for me, so really, can a top 20 breakout? I think so, particularly if he can handle CF. Even if he is in LF, if his bat comes together, watch out. If both Colvin and Guyer max out, Colvin may be the better average hitter, but Guyer has the pop. Look at Guyer’s months – not once did he have a month of SLG below .462. Had he qualified, Guyer’s .500 SLG would’ve ranked 2nd in the MWL. That’s pop, folks, and for the solidly built 6’1" 210 pounder, there portends the potential for more pop than he’s shown. Post ASB, he posted a .286/.352/.513 line. As expected, for a power hitter, he’s a FB guy. I couldn’t rank him higher, as July really propelled his stats, so I’d like to see some more consistency. He’s got some speed, going 22/29 in SB Attempts. He’s got to cut down on the K’s. A bit of hyperbole, but if the former HS football player puts it together, we’ve got a stud bat, even if he’s in LF. And now … he’s escaping the unfriendly confines of the MWL for the warm weather of Daytona to start, as long as he stays healthy (there’s some health issues, but I don’t recall off the top). If he can handle CF, and he might be a case of a guy who could perhaps handle CF in his youth but eventually move to the corners, AND his bat comes through … WHOA. Okay, now I’m going overboard, but still, you get the point.

by toonsterwu on Jan 3, 2009 11:43 PM CST reply actions  

Well have a few more post topics that I wanted to run through

Anyhow, some SP guesses for each of the 4 full season minor league squads (Iowa/Tennessee/Daytona/Peoria) at the start of the season. I’ll make a separate post on other pitchers later, some of them who may end up starting over some of the guys I’ve listed below.

Iowa Pitching Staff

Mitch Atkins
Esmailin Caridad
Randy Wells
Kevin Hart
JR Mathes

I think it’s possible that we sign a veteran arm to the mix. If Hart and/or Wells are in the majors, that changes the equation, but that always happens in AAA.

No high level talent here. Atkins and Caridad have been discussed, along with Wells. All three, along with Hart, are possible end of the rotation/pen arm types in the bigs. I think Hart could start in the minors, due to the big league logjam. I also think he might start as a starter, as Hart’s issue last year was losing a feel for some of his pitches, but if Hart is called up, it’ll be as a pen arm in all likelihood.

The only real breakout possibility would be Caridad, but he’s already been in the chattering this offseason. What do we know, right now, though? He can throw strikes and has a solid arsenal. Can he kick up the velo consistently, as he did in AFL? Mathes is a system arm.

Tennessee Pitching Staff

Hung-Wen Chen
Marco Carrillo
Billy Muldowney
Alessandro Maestri
Jeremy Papelbon

Like the Iowa possibilities above, the Tennessee 5 doesn’t offer much high level talent. The one exception maybe Maestri, but he has work to do to stick in the rotation, and his future may be as a pen arm. Chen has secondary stuff and average stuff. Well, same goes for Carrillo. Muldowney’s a nice, “bulldog” type strike thrower. All three are end of the rotation types. Tough option on the 5th starter, but I think the Cubs would use Jeremy Papelbon to have a stretched out lefty in the upper levels. Jeremy’s future may be sorta what Sean Marshall is right now. If I had to pick a sleeper, I’d go with Chen, as he might be able to be in that 92 range on his fastball, which would set things up better. Moved to the pen, and maybe he kicks it up. Actually, Chen might make a decent pen arm if it wasn’t for our system depth not needing it. Maestri is a possible breakout, depending on how things go. The stuff is there to be intriguing, a potential middle-end of the rotation type, or a 7th inning type arm in the bigs perhaps.

Daytona Pitching Staff

James Russell
Jay Jackson
Casey Coleman
Aaron Shafer
Robert Hernandez

Now, here’s some intrigue folks. This would be an exciting five at the start of the year. All five would have prospect value entering the year. Albeit, all five need work. All five have been detailed above, so let’s see. If I had to guess a breakout, I’d go with Jay Jackson. Not really a breakout, as he’s a top guy, but I wonder if he might make a Garza like leap up the minors of a few years ago (although I don’t see Jackson reaching the bigs). If I had to guess a sleeper, it’d be Robert Hernandez, who might really sleep his way up the board if another secondary offering develops.

Peoria Pitching Staff

Chris Carpenter
Justin Bristow
Jeff Beliveau
Kevin Kreier
James Leverton

This one’s intriguing as well. All 5 have value of some sort. Kreier has performed decently, but his stuff is fringy. Leverton may be in the pen, but he’s got upside. Bristow and Carpenter have been discussed. There’s room for growth here.

Sleeper/Breakout Possibility: Jeff Beliveau

Meet Rich Hill, v. 2.0, mini-me, which might be a good thing. He comes complete with a decent low 90’s fastball and a devastating curveball. He also comes complete with a nonexistent third pitch (okay, I’m exaggerating.) Furthermore, he also comes complete with mechanical issues that has caused control problems. Now, the issues, from what I understand, are a bit different. Beliveau is a shorter guy, though, and that may be a good thing.

by toonsterwu on Jan 5, 2009 6:13 PM CST reply actions  

No Archer in Peoria?

Otherwise nice job as always.

by rlpete on Jan 5, 2009 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

My guess

and again, it’s just shot in the dark guessing as of now, is that Archer starts in the pen at Peoria … or the Cubs start him at XST and work on fixing his mechanics before moving him forward. That said, you could perhaps flip Archer with a Leverton. As with all A ball arms, some movement between rotation and pen can be expected depending on how things go.

by toonsterwu on Jan 6, 2009 2:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Just a note to pass along

Baseball America listed Jose Ceda as the Marlins 10th best prospect which either says a lot about their system or a lot about ours.

"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"

by fischisgod on Jan 5, 2009 8:41 PM CST reply actions  

as a note

the marlins system is excellent, and we are at the back end of systems in the majors.

by toonsterwu on Jan 5, 2009 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

As I've said before on this

It wouldn’t surprise me if Ceda was, at some point this season, a solid middle relief, if not setup arm. It also wouldn’t surprise me if Ceda was closing games at some point this season (and doing well at it) although 2010 or 2011 is more likely for that.

by toonsterwu on Jan 6, 2009 2:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I think he could've very well helped the Cubs...

…as a mid- to late-season callup. I’ll be interested to see how he does for Florida.

Yes, yes ... winter is indeed a pond upon which all of us must skate, braving frostbite and runny noses in the hopes that our cars will start and we shan't embarass ourselves slipping on a patch of black ice. Spring is more a quagmire of cold mud and slush, and fall is a pile of fallen leaves that may or may not hide a pile of doggy doo-doo. But summer, ah summer is an oasis of endless green that disappears all too quickly beneath our feet as we rush through its warm, glorious bliss.

by daver on Jan 6, 2009 1:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Well aware

"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"

by fischisgod on Jan 5, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Also I havent said this but

Excellent work to the OP!!!1 I cant say enough. Where did you get all the info for your scouting reports. I love following our system and am intrigued.

"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"

by fischisgod on Jan 5, 2009 8:46 PM CST reply actions  

Well, to somewhat finish things off

I should revise my rotation projections – I’d guess Marcos Mateo will make the Tennessee rotation, with either Chen or Maestri in the pen, probably Chen.

Other arms:

AAA – Justin Berg could find himself in the rotation there. Signings Angel Castro and Jason Waddell could be useful arms in Iowa or Tennessee. I’d guess Waddell makes Iowa, as we need a lefty there. Both were effective in AA for their respective organizations last year (Castro – Tigers, Waddell – Giants). If I had to guess a closer, I’d guess Roquet over Ascanio right now. Greg Reinhard is coming off a solid adjustment to the pen and likely will be in AAA after being solid in AA last year. Casey Lambert could be in AAA or AA. It seems quite likely that we might add a couple minor league FA types to the mix. There’s probably an arm or two that I’m missing, but those would be the main ones to watch. Jeff Stevens will likely be here to start the year.

Comment: The pen should be effective. There should be a decent amount of options, with two solid AAA pen arms potentially in Roquet and Ascanio. If there’s a sleeper, it might be minor league FA signing Jason Waddell. He was strong against lefties last year (2.79 FIP, .231 Average against, 10+ K rate). Considering that Cotts and Marshall aren’t exactly LOOGY’s, keep an eye out on Waddell, who might be able to fit into the mix. Waddell sort of got jerked around in the Giants organization.

AA – Chen could be a valuable swing man. Former Blue Jays top prospect, Vince Perkins, will likely fit into the mix here or in Daytona, at least, to start. Brian Schlitter should be the closer to begin the year. Lambert/Castro/Waddell could fit here, although I think Waddell is solid for AAA, with Lambert probably starting in AA. Jayson Ruhlman may fit here as another lefty. Blake Parker and Jordan Latham could help anchor things here. Campusano could fit into the mix. A minor league FA or two may fit into the picture depending on how things shake out.

Comments: Latham/Parker/Schlitter back end could be solid. I don’t really see a sleeper. If I had to pick a breakout, it would be Latham, who has the stuff to potentially emerge as a late inning option.

Daytona – Cashner should anchor the pen at the start of the year. Former 2nd round pick, Grant Johnson, may start here. If Rich Hill is in the organization, I would guess that they start him at Daytona, in the nice warm weather, but maybe they push him to Tennessee. That said, Hill isn’t a lock to be in the organization. John Gaub is possibly going to go here, along with perhaps Dustin Sasser. Former catcher Jake Muyco could start here. Jose Pina is a thought here.

Comments: The setup crew to Cashner looks a bit shaky right now, so that’s worth watching. There are solid middle relievers, so maybe someone emerges. A guy to watch would be Jose Pina. There’s some raw stuff there to be a solid pen arm. Muyco could emerge in his 2nd year pitching, as a tough, Blake Parker-esque, bulldog type (and both were former catchers to boot).

Peoria – I think Archer starts as a swing man, but it very well could be Leverton. Ryan Searle could fit into the mix here as a pen arm or a starter. Dan McDaniel will anchor the pen to start the year. Cedric Redmond and Marcus Hatley both could be here, and both would be worth watching as pen arms. Alberto Cabrera could fit into the mix, and maybe big Rafael Dolis is a thought. Ryan Buchter, who we got in the Matt Avery trade, could fit into the mix here.

Comments: If I had to guess a sleeper, maybe someone like Rafael Dolis. Ceda-lite perhaps in some respects. That said, pick an arm. There’s a lot of raw arms. Archer could emerge. McDaniel should anchor a solid versatile pen.

____________________________________________________________

I’m sort of rushing this to get it on before this post disappears. This isn’t meant as a thorough review of all the other options, and if I get time, I’ll revisit this. Had one more post I wanted to make, though.

by toonsterwu on Jan 9, 2009 12:48 PM CST reply actions  

Be excited (at the beginning of the year)

For Ryne Sandberg – AA doesn’t look that hot to start the year. An average offense, iffy rotation, and average pen. If Sandberg does anything with them at the beginning, he’s going to bump his status up a bit (not that it wasn’t high to begin with).

About Peoria overall – I know, hard for folks to get excited about Low A. But it offers some very intriguing arms and a solid anchor in the pen in McDaniel. The lineup could be intriguing. One possibility might be:

Campana, CF
Harrison, 2nd
Vitters, 3rd
Rundle, RF
Ridling, 1st
Keedy or Opitz, LF
Perez, C
Castro SS

I’m not saying all these guys will pan out, as I doubt it, but that’s a potentially solid Low A lineup that offers speed at the top, power in the middle, and some quality prospect talent there.

About Daytona Pitching – Some key arms likely to start there, like Cashner, Jackson, Shafer, Hernandez, Coleman, Russell, perhaps Gaub. Those are key arms that could make a difference.

_________________________________________

Be excited for (midseason)

Ryne Sandberg – There’s a chance that he could get some good callups midseason, with Rosa/Smith/Flaherty/Guyer as decent possibilities if things go well, and Vitters as a darkhorse option, and Johnston as a guy to pay some attention to. Add in the possibility of some arms moving up, and he could have a loaded 2nd half roster to make a run with.

__________________________

Be excited about the direction of the system. Look, it’s not a good system, but there’s some hope in the low levels, and considering our win now mode, that works. Not everyone will pan out, but if some do, we will be able to better transition from the veterans to the next generation. Be excited about the athleticism with our pitchers that Wilken has drafted. That bodes well for the future.

Hope for more power, more front of the rotation potential.

Be intrigued with the college focus, but hope that we aren’t limiting ourselves a bit.

_____________________________

General level thoughts:

Peoria and Daytona offer two squads that, IMO, should be able to compete in the first half of the year. These are two talented squads for their levels, IMO. If both are not at the top of their division in the early going, I will be a tad surprised.

Tennessee’s talent isn’t there at the start. The offense is a bit shaky unless someone emerges, despite most of it being the core of the Daytona championship squad. The pitching doesn’t have top end talent, but it is a “gutsy” type group that may overachieve.

Iowa depends on minor league FA additions. It probably won’t be as strong as last year’s crop, as the offense should take a step back.
__________________________________________

There’s some other things I’d like to post on, but this thread will likely be gone soon.

by toonsterwu on Jan 9, 2009 1:00 PM CST reply actions  

Small revision

As noted, I don’t make a list and just say that’s that. There’s certainly a lot I don’t know, and I’m open to ideas. After contemplating things, some small changes I would make (in regards to the revised list above).

Wellington Castillo – I’m a fan, but there’s a lot of work. As good as his defense is, more work is needed. Mostly consistency, but add in that the bat is still raw, and I think I need to be fair and downgrade that to C+. Kept him at 6, though.

Jovan Rosa – Kept him at 7, but change that to a C+. I shouldn’t incorporate my biases into my grades, and just because I like him a lot doesn’t change that he has to max his potential. Namely, the power.

Brandon Guyer – The big mover and shaker. There’s enough statistical and performance numbers. There’s enough upside. Sure, he’s more valuable in CF than LF, so let’s wait and see on that, but I think there’s enough performance for a C+. Slid him up to 11, after Castillo/Rosa/Colvin/Castro/Lee.

Flip Stevens and McDaniel (McDaniel 12, Stevens 13). McDaniel’s got better raw stuff, and his fast-curve offering, by most accounts, is legit. If stuck in the pen, McDaniel could move fast. Stevens is more middle relief, fringe setup.

Keep Rhee in place but give him a C+ with an asterisk. Yes, TJ isn’t as big an issue anymore. It’s still a surgery on a kid, though.

Flip Bristow/Russell at 28 and 29. I think Bristow’s got more upside and both are far away.

Flip Spears/Papelbon – Papelbon could provide more value for the organization, potentially (Papelbon at 30).

Cerda at 31 – Very intriguing asset with a lot of upside. Folks are just big on him.

Spears at 32/Samson at 33 – Good guys, and they may surprise, but on the surface, utility types.

In an odd flop, I switched Archer and Wells. Wells utility isn’t as high as his value, and Archer’s upside is rather intriguing.

by toonsterwu on Jan 9, 2009 9:43 PM CST reply actions  

On more post

Let’s see -

Bold predictions (things that I can see happen, but not necessarily sold they will)-

Jay Jackson becomes our David Price. No, I’m not saying Jackson is as good. Rather, I can see Jackson zooming up our system and forcing his way onto the roster late. Along with this, I can see Jackson move ahead of Samardzija in the pecking order for a rotation spot.

Andrew Cashner gets a quick bump to AA … and struggles some.

Tony Thomas gets moved to CF … because Ryan Flaherty forces his way into AA.

___________________________________________________________

Two guesses at system player of the year (so I can hedge my bets):

Positional -

A) Brandon Guyer – Guyer puts it together offensively and shows a decent ability to play CF.

B) Jovan Rosa – The power starts to happen, putting Rosa on track to replace Lee.

Pitching -

A) Jay Jackson – Change develops, fastball gets a little more velo, and we’ve got ourselves a potential TOR.

B) Casey Coleman – Joe Coleman’s boy emerges and shows some improved velo and moves up the ladder.

by toonsterwu on Jan 9, 2009 9:50 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule
MLB.com Cubs Top 20 prospect list
A position ranking of the NL central by ESPN.
Draft Pick Currency and the Cubs
Yoenis Cespedes

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  19 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski