Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

"My family and I are Cubs fans," said Tom Ricketts, the family's point person in the Cubs purchase. "We share the goal of Cubs fans everywhere to win a World Series and build the consistent championship tradition that the fans deserve."

about 3 years ago Alyellontoppscard_tiny Al Yellon 141 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This makes me all giddy

Erm, well if we are going to call Milton Bradley nicknames, mine is Fischer Price: yes, you heard it here first..

by Chanman25 on Jan 23, 2009 6:31 AM CST reply actions  

Sounds great! Finally we have a Cubs fan as team owner!

I’ve had enough of newspaper conglomerate management, and quirky chewing gum magnates.

"I'm not much of a chemistry guy, you know. Chemistry to me is a pinch-hit double with the bases loaded"--Jim Frey, Chicago Tribune, 1985.

by zevkalman on Jan 23, 2009 7:37 AM CST reply actions  

I hope this leads

to a long run of sound player personnel decisions, financial commitment and a championship. If Ricketts is a cubs fan, he knows all too well what we want and need.

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Jan 23, 2009 8:01 AM CST reply actions  

I couldn't agree more.

As long as he’s willing to spend, I think we are in extremely good hands.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 8:11 AM CST up reply actions  

This does sound promising but I still maintain

we could have done a lot worse than the Tribune. I really feel they got a bad rap.

Dallas Green!

by SonnyJ9 on Jan 23, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 8:30 AM CST up reply actions  

I see light at the end of the tunnel

Now I’m hoping that the Peavy price drops to bargain pricing, and we can get that done too, then, BUILD THE FARM SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!
The Cubs make way too much money from us fans to rank #27.
The Red Sox have set the bar, lets exceed it, I think we may have the owner in place to do that!!! FINALLY!!!

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 8:34 AM CST reply actions  

Since Ricketts is not officially the owner yet...

… any Peavy deal might have to wait till the trading deadline.

At this point, I think we can have that much patience.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 8:44 AM CST up reply actions  

True

I think at this point, we can all be happy to have the sale almost completed.
And if Ricketts is truly a Cub fan, we have a great deal to look forward to.
And I agree on the patience part, I think we all will be happy to see what happens moving forward.
These could be great times for Cubs fans.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 8:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Do you get the feeling

That the Cubs are waiting to see how Harden’s arm is holding up to see how necessary a deal for Peavy might be?

by NWIowaCubFan on Jan 23, 2009 9:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Or

they are waiting to see how desperate the Pads get.
I know Al and I have both agreed numerous times that the Cubs are dealing from a position of strength, so I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Pads try an unload him closer to opening day just to trim payroll.
Its also possible that its a little bit of both, waiting for SD to flinch, and waiting to see how Hardens arm holds.
Either way, whether we get Peavy or not, I think we are stocked on SPs.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions  

putting aside the dollars for a moment

if it gets to the point where there’s a deal on the table that does NOT include Vitters, I think it’d be baseball-stupid not to make the deal. I gotta believe though that the Padres won’t do the deal unless Vitters is part of it.

So to me, that’s the measure of how desperate the Fathers are – whether or not Vitters is part of the deal.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 23, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm happy

there is finally one person that is ultimately responsible for the Cubs direction. I realize that doesn’t guarantee success, but many of the consistent franchises across sports have 1 visible owner. (Red Sox, Yankees, Steelers, Mavericks, and in the infancy….HAWKS!)
And I like the story where him and his wife met in the bleachers.

I'm finally moving on...

by slocs55 on Jan 23, 2009 8:39 AM CST reply actions  

Great quote from Mr. Ricketts

Hopefully, sometime soon, he follows it up with something like this:

"We’re going to invest in the team – both on the field and in Wrigley Field itself, to assure that the Cubs are continually in a position to compete for World Series titles.

“We will follow the models of baseball’s successful franchises, investing in player development and other areas to assure that the Cubs are not beholden to the free agent market, but are in a position to develop talent as well.”

That’s what I hope, at least.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 23, 2009 9:19 AM CST reply actions  

I think we'll hear something very much like that.

It follows naturally from the original statement.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

It’s the exection and effectivness of the plan that’s yet to be evaluated…………..

by MrShowtime on Jan 23, 2009 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Well, they can borrow that if they'd like

I’m excited to have someone who seems to “get” what the Cubs mean to people and are about running the show.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Bill Potter on Jan 23, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Let's hold it to him

and remember this quote on the dark days.

One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.

by chilango2 on Jan 23, 2009 10:21 AM CST reply actions  

He had me at hello.

I can think of no three better words than “consistent championship tradition.” I’m not expecting miracles – though one every century or so would be nice. Just give me a winning baseball team that it’s in the hunt every season and that I can be proud of.

RIP Ron Asheton (1948-2009)

by daver on Jan 23, 2009 10:36 AM CST reply actions  

I think John McDonoungh said it best

It’s time for the Cubs to win the World Series — not win the Wild Card or win the division or win the pennant," “It’s time to win. It’s time to win the World Series.” Now with an owner in place who understands the plight of us fans it may very well happen. No longer will ownership be worried about profits instead of championships. I look forward to ownership doing what is necessary by pulling out all the stops for the Cubs to win a World Series.

Someday we'll go all the way.

by Cubbinstrongsince86 on Jan 23, 2009 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

The sad thing...

Is that if this team actually does win a championship, the sheer legend and fan outburst alone will make it’s value positively Priceless. Not only will more fans than ever buy more merchandice than ever, it will simply raise the value of the stock of the Chicago Cubs and Wrigley Field to a level unsurpassed by almost anything in history.

by northernsails on Jan 23, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

At least...

that’s my opinion. I’m hardly a Finance or Econ guy

by northernsails on Jan 23, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I remember John McDonough saying

that winning is the best marketing plan.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 23, 2009 9:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Ricketts OVERPAID!

How could the Cubs sell for $900 million when John Henry bought the Red Sox in 2002 for almost the same amount? The Red Sox were perennial contenders who always fielded good teams. Granted they hadn’t won a WS since 1918. However, the teams were always competitive and had a cult following similiar, if not greater than the Cubs. Throw in the current economic evironment and the sale price becomes even more bloated.

"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse

by ronsanto10 on Jan 23, 2009 12:37 PM CST reply actions  

If winning baseball games translated to value

the Marlins would be worth a lot more than they are now. The value of a team has everything to do with how much money could be earned by owning it. The Cubs have a larger market than Boston, fans that have shown they will attend games even if the team is not winning, and the sale also included the stadium (which may or may not be worth more in potential income than Fenway) and 25% of the Comcast Sports Net.

A winning team is simply part of that equation.

by madcow256 on Jan 23, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, at after spending all that money..

…Ricketts has enough sense to build a new stadium.

"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse

by ronsanto10 on Jan 23, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you really know how may fans

that would totally piss off??
I think he will work on restoring Wrigley, but to build a new stadium is really daft IMO.
And Fenway has blossomed since it was restored / rebuilt.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

They will get over it. White Sox fans did.

"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse

by ronsanto10 on Jan 23, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I must disagree

I don’t think some of the Cubs fans ever would, Wrigley is a shrine, and a symbol, althouhg it needs some serious TLC, its still workable.
If Fenway can be restored, then Wrigley can too.
Regardless of opinion though, I really doubt Ricketts will build a new stadium, with his ties to Wrigley and all.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

TLC?

It needs me? those are my initials……..

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL

But only if you restore it too.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I sure can restore it

I am not saying it will lok good, or pass any codes, but I will try

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

OK, want to compare to Fenway?

For starters:
Where do you place the new bullpens so they are not on the foul lines?
Where do you put the Jumbotron scoreboard?

And in my opinion, Fenway is still a dump. Sometimes you just have to give up on nostalgia and move on.

"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse

by ronsanto10 on Jan 23, 2009 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Have you been to Fenway lately?

Most Red Sox fans would disagree with you.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

ok

I won’t profess to have been there recently, so I can’t totally say its still better, but the last time I did go, prior to the restoration that is, it was in really poor shape, and the after was much better.
Will Wrigley get the same facelift?? not sure.
But, I think the only viable middle ground, woudl be to build a new stadium, and use the old for minor leagues, or as a historical site.
Although I still like the idea of play at Wrigley, and I do hope it can be turned into a good park again. But reality may be a factor.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually

Money may be a bigger factor.
I will reiterate as well, I still want Wrigley to get restored, but I know there is allot of disagreement, just mulling over thoughts in my head.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

That actually is a viable option.

Obviously, it would be prudent to wait until the credit markets improve. I had dinner with a real estate guy from Chicago and he threw out the old Meigs Field as a great location for a new park. Wouldn’t that be nice…people in kayaks in Lake Michigan in the summer waiting for that Soriano home run ball.

"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse

by ronsanto10 on Jan 23, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Meh,

I guess deep down I’m a purist, I still want to see Wrigleyused for the Cubs, and restored, but there is the financial portion as well.
Do you build a new stadium, and improve the seating capacity, and everything else?? or do you restore, either way, Wrigley will cost a bunch to fix for whoever uses it.
As a Cubs fan I want to keep Wrigley for the Cubs, but seeing through the market as well, I see benefits to all sides.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd prefer an airport there

Daley screws up the transportation infrastructure under false pretense, then claims he’s a hero for adding an O’Hare runway. He causes the taxpayers to pay fines to the FAA and damages to aircraft owners/operators, destroys a Coast Guard hub . . .

Ok, I’ll stop here.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 23, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll pick it up from here...

Gotta love a guy who can plow Xs into runways in the middle of the night but won’t plow side streets for days…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 23, 2009 9:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Touche!

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 24, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, I'm definitely NOT in favor of tearing down Wrigley...

…but I must confess that the thought of a fully modernized lakefront ballpark is rather enticing.

Consistent. Championship. Tradition.

by daver on Jan 23, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

And I agree

I woudl never want Wrigley to be torn down, but I see both side, and IF there was enough steam to build anew stadium, I woudl recommend someone like the cheifs live in Wrigley and the Cubs have their new park.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Just move the wall!!

And bring all the local bars inside the gates. I’m sure they’d split the profits.

by Clutche on Jan 23, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

If nothing else

There would be an increase in the number of bathrooms

by Clutche on Jan 23, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Very true

possibly cleaner too, (Did I say that??)

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't really see the benefit of it, to be honest

I lived in Atlanta, went to many Braves games, and never really got anything out of all the “modern amenities.” Turner, for example, has a huge jumbotron, to which I said “meh.” I was watching the game on the field, and the only place I ever had trouble seeing it, in the outfied, was the one place where you couldn’t see the jumbotron.

Maybe it’s just because I’m a history buff, or maybe it’s just because I didn’t get to go until I was 25 — but I’d take Wrigley over Turner any day.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 23, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

You mean

The little shops at every other stpe wasn’t enough to make you love it??
I have been there too many time, and usually gotten grief for wearing a Cubs jersey, but I think Turner Field is missing that whole feel that both Wrigley and Fenway have.
May be nostaligia, or it may be that you feel more a part of the game in those two.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, I was referring more to the actual playing field and the player's facilities.

Seems like a lot of Cubs players (Big Z, for instance) have made some subtle and not-so-subtle comments on the difficulties of the small clubhouse, the very inconvenient batting cages, etc.

Consistent. Championship. Tradition.

by daver on Jan 23, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

viable?

While Northerly Island could lend itself well to a nice lakefront park with spectacular skyline views, I think the gameday logistics would be a little bit daunting. Can you imagine 40,000 people going to and from the park on game day via that one road (E. Solidarity Drive)? Although there’d be lots of parking due to close proximity to Soldier Field, public transportation would be way worse than it is now.

Besides, I can’t swim very well, so my ballhawking career would be severely curtailed. I’d have to pull a Don Novello and train me some Portuguese Water Dogs to retrieve the home run balls.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 23, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a good point about the logistics.

It would also make downtown/LSD traffic about 20 times worse on game days. Maybe they could restrict automobiles from the area entirely and use an underground rail system to get everyone in and out. Ah, science fiction is fun.

And I was picturing you in a kayak a la AT&T Park in San Francisco. Just don’t get caught in a current or you could end up somewhere in northern Michigan.

Consistent. Championship. Tradition.

by daver on Jan 24, 2009 9:02 AM CST up reply actions  

I think my biggest fear in that regards,

other than Wrigley being torn down, is a nightmare like Ten Run Field or Fruit Juce Field, or whatever it name is now. I am all for the nostalgia, but I also understand that Wrigley is one of the smallest parks in all of baseball, fitting for a minor league team, not a mlb team.
Regardless, I think there is too much history there to build a new park, and I think it has the same affect on Ricketts.
Oh, and Fenway is AMAZING compared to its prior condition.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

That or

Ads everywhere

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

But I must admit, I am still confused by the train in houston, wasn’t the design of CF enough to boggle the mind??

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions  

The train

is because where MMF stands used to be there Grand Central Station back in the day. I had to ask as well. There is a bar there (where Cub fans flock) that is called B.U.S. (Bar @ Union Station)

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

I have a friend in Houston who couldn’t answer that one for me.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

New Game

Name That Ballparks Historics Goofy Shit that you see at the game?

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

That

might be a new one for here, The odd things at the parks and why in the hell are they there.. good idea… Myabe we should ask Al. LOL

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions  

to follow that up

It is alse a part of why their AAA team is Named “Round Rock Express”

There is a train track that runs next to the ballpark, the tie in to the Astros ballpark (goofy, but it is true) and of course Nolar Ryans “Express” fastball

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

For starters?

Move the bullpens to the walkway beneath the Bleachers. I vended at Wrigley and there is a massive amount of room down there.

The Jumbotron is another story. I cant see it being placed anywhere that wont destroy part of the Wrigley field historia.

by northernsails on Jan 23, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions  

There isn't THAT much room.

However, if they build the triangle building and move the batting cages there, there MIGHT be some room.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 25, 2009 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

why not

have them warm up in the middle of Waveland or Sheffiled

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 25, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

that's a great idea!

I can personally show Wuertz where some of the bombs he gave up landed… ;-)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 25, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

There wouldn't be enough room for you...

… to show that to Howry, if he was still here…

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 25, 2009 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

and thank the heavens he isn't!

"Truth does not do as much good in the world as the semblance of truth does evil," - Duc de La Rochefoucauld, Maxims, 64.

by Emelie on Jan 26, 2009 4:55 AM CST up reply actions  

If they're willing to move...

the spiral staircase out and push some of the commisaries away and get rid of the spyhole there’s enough. But I agree the the triangle building would free up a large amount of space. The trick is actually getting it done.

by northernsails on Jan 25, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it will get done.

If all goes well with the sale, construction could start next offseason.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 25, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Adjusted for inflation

The BoSox would be worth 1.2 billion in today depressed marlket

by Clutche on Jan 23, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

The Red Sox were sold for $700 million, not $900 millon.

There’s quite a bit of difference there, not to mention it’s 7 years later.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

What do you think the Red Sox would sell for today if they were for sale?

I’d say more than $900 million.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 1:48 PM CST up reply actions  

What all was included

In the BoSox sale? Did it include 25% stake in a station, ala CSN?

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

It included 80% of NESN.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I think we should keep in mind

these values are guessitimates by Forbes. MLB teams are private and their books are closed to the public.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 23, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Not really

They’re private, but must report revenues and operating profit to MLB

by Clutche on Jan 23, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Purchase price isn't completely determined by value

There are other factors that go into it as well, including what a new owner thinks the potential for growth is, how badly he/she wants the asset, etc.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 23, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Just over $20 million.

(It’s been in all the papers.)

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 23, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

And, having been around then...

… I can tell you that $20 million was considered a huge sum for a baseball team in 1981.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a good point.

The stands were empty during most of the decade before the Trib bought the team.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 23, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Barring any rainouts,

I bet they will set a new attendance record this year just due to fewer home games in April. I don’t think they even play at home until mid-April, opposed to last year when they opened the season at home.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 23, 2009 4:15 PM CST up reply actions  

hard to say

since the attendance is based on tickets sold, not tickets collected at the gate (correct me if i am wrong)

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 23, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

It'll be hard to break a record...

… set in a year when they played to 99.1% of capacity.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 5:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't count them out yet

The papers need to re-think their model, but a lot of people still like having the paper in their hands.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 23, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

yes,

but they keep that in the bathroom don’t they?? Kidding, I’ll stop now.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

As a newspaper journalist

It’s time to go online. It’s the only way to cut non-core functions, like distribution, and stop cutting content. The only problem is that the people in the big offices spent their entire careers selling ads in newspapers and can’t conceive that that model is dead.

All IMO, of course. And I’ll stop talking shop now.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 23, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually, I find your insider perspective interesting

I do think the commuters will still want a paper, though. Wireless devices are great, but the displays are small and it makes it hard to browse thru articles. Also, while it’s not what chrisw95 meant, some people do read during a constitutional . . . .

I don’t subscribe to a paper, because I have a long commute that I drive to. I get my sports online and my news mainly on the radio during the drive. However, if I took public transportation, I think that I’d like to have a paper on the way.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 23, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Although I stated in humour,

I happen to agree, I know if I had to ride MARTA all the time, I would want ANYTHING to read, and the displays on handhelds are getting larger, and clearer, the providers are slow to adapt to an unlitited stream (Most here are limited to 5gb a month).
And if you use anything data related for work, that is usually gone in about the months time, not counting any extra “surfing”.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I like having a hard copy sometimes, too

I’m thinking about the survival of the industry, though. My father will still tell you with a straight face that vinyl records were better than casettes or CDs when it comes to not breaking, etc. He might be right; who knows? But there’s not a market for vinyl anymore.

I’m just thinking about reality, and the fact that the industry has to cut a tremendous amount of cost over the next decade or so. As a fan of media as well as a reporter, I’d rather those cuts come in distribution — as much I hate to lose anyone in the industry — than in content.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 23, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, capital costs

Those are higher for a printing press, etc., than for the content side.

Now, I will honestly stop.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 23, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Let me chime in.

What the managers at newspapers don’t seem to understand is that they are in the information business, not the “print a daily newspaper” business. If they ever figured that out, maybe they’d figure out a way to stay in business.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Jan 23, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions  

You are so right Al

But unfortunately, they are so far behind in the internet game that they can’t replace lost ad revenue in print with any other dissemination of their news online or otherwise. They are screwed.

by Clutche on Jan 23, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

OT -- vinyl

Best Buy was selling it the last time I stopped in . . . .

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 24, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Who's MARTA?

Consistent. Championship. Tradition.

by daver on Jan 23, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

only

not nearly as fun as the CTA. The sorts you see on MARTA aren’t nearly as ammusing. And no pantless days here. (bummer)

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 4:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Ah, I see.

I thought maybe he misspelled “Metra.”

Consistent. Championship. Tradition.

by daver on Jan 23, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Unfortunately, no.

Its an acronym for a silly thing, Metro Atlanta Rail Transit Authourity, and their wesite, not to plug, but to show how silly it is: itsmarta.
Anything to make a Y shapped public transport have the word Smart in it. Go Figure.

by chrisw95 on Jan 23, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

In the words of Lewis Black: "Subway to Nowhere"

One of my friends from Connecticut literally laughed when she saw the “subway system” in Atlanta.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Jan 26, 2009 12:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Good Move

That’s about all there is to it.

Chicago Cubs 2009 World Series Champions

by CUBSfaninYANKEEcountry on Jan 23, 2009 4:16 PM CST reply actions  

I am really happy abou the Ricketts family

They seem like they might have a economic downturn proof business because people will probably always have to trade stocks? I am really happy. I ave been thinking about it all day and this is the best possibl owner. Much beter than cuban.

I am really not sure how i feel about Peavy. I am very very ver indifferent. I really realyl really really dont want to give up Vitters but in the heat of the moment if we did it i would say hell yea! Weird

"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"

by fischisgod on Jan 24, 2009 12:15 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule
MLB.com Cubs Top 20 prospect list

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  256 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski