Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

The Cub Can Of Worms: Dusty Baker

This one could open some old wounds, so I'll be fairly brief. Most of you know I defended Dusty Baker far beyond the point at which it was reasonable to do so. I was wrong. Period. In reality, Baker should have been fired after the 2004 season, when he lost control of the team. The antics that occurred are well documented, and likely were a contributing factor in the loss of the wild-card spot that season, a playoff berth that team should have won easily.

I'm not even going to go through Baker's wacky quotes, ranging from his complaints about broadcasters to the famous "walks clog the bases" remark.

What I do want to focus on here is one incident, an incident that can be summed up in the photo that accompanies this post. It is from, as I am sure you remember, game six of the 2003 NLCS. You know what Prior is pointing at -- the incident where the foul ball was interfered with.

photo via chicago.cubs.mlb.com

We remember Prior as dominant in 2003, long before his injuries derailed his career. His 18-6, 2.43 season was one of the best in baseball that year, and he was breezing through the Marlins that night at Wrigley Field. The final score doesn't indicate how dominant he was on that October evening -- until the incident in the 8th, he had faced 29 batters and allowed two walks and three hits.

The look on his face and the way he was pointing reminds us, five years later, that despite his dominance, he was a 23-year-old kid who had just finished his first full major league season, and this incident had clearly rattled him.

And the manager sat in the dugout and did nothing. Dusty Baker could have done one of several things: first, he should have gone to the mound to try to settle his pitcher down, at the very least. And then, after Prior walked the hitter (Luis Castillo) who hit the foul ball, putting runners on first and second, he probably should have taken him out of the game; Joe Borowski, who was a solid closer in 2003, was warmed up and ready. Though Borowski had only five outings longer than an inning in 2003, if you win the game you're in the World Series and you have three days off! There's no doubt in my mind that Joe Torre would have called on Mariano Rivera in that situation. Or just about any other manager would have called on his closer to get those five elusive outs.

But Baker did nothing until Prior had faced three more batters, retiring none of them, and the game was tied.

You know what happened next, I don't have to rehash it here. Forget all the other stuff that happened under Baker's watch -- to me, this one was the most unforgivable, because if he had handled the situation the way a true leader would have, I am convinced the Cubs would have won the game and been in the World Series.

This will close the Can of Worms, as the season approaches. Oh, one more thing. Since so many of you seem interested in him, Jake Peavy has never lost to a team managed by Dusty Baker, going 2-0 with three no-decisions.

0 recs  |  Comment 219 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Game Six

Nuff said.

Ricketts and the red & blue to the promised land in ’09!

"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett

by The Ryno and I Know on Jan 27, 2009 8:11 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Oh how I bought into the Dusty's going to help idea

upon his 2002 fall hiring.

After the “incident” in the 8th inning, all I kept asking everyone around me, was where the hell was Dusty? Even after the 1st guy got on afterwards, where was he???

ALL sports utilize the “timeout” method to break momentum, even to the point in football to “freeze” the kicker before a game-altering FG attempt. OK, this wasn’t a “timeout” but WHERE WAS DUSTY? Would it have changed anything? Can’t tell, but doing nothing and then watching the touchdown and 2-pt conversion made me ill.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Jan 27, 2009 8:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

We all bought into that idea in fall 2002.

The Reds bought into it last year. They seem to be going nowhere fast.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i don't think very many people bought Dusty at Redreporter

must of the members at Redreporter were cringing at the thought of Dusty the day Jerry Narron was fired in 2007.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In defense (!) of Dusty

IIRC, Rothschild did go out to the mound after the next pitch (ball 4). Prior had shown much more poise all season long — there was no reason to think that this would be different. And, if Alex Gonzalez cleanly fields a routine ground ball, this discussion never takes place.

Baker lost the team in 2004. There is no question of that. I’ve said that many times, and posted that several times here. Instead of telling his team to “Shut the #%^@ up and play ball”, he was a ring leader in the whining. His habit of playing favorites (literally and figuratively) hurt the team in 2005 and 2006, and not bringing him back was the right move.

However, I remain convinced that no one would have gotten them as far as he did in 2003 — and no way will I blame game 6 on him.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 8:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't recall Rothschild coming out.

But I’ll take your word for it. Poise or not, that was a different situation and needed to be treated differently.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Rothschild and Baker

I might be wrong about the mound visit. I turned on ESPN a while back when they were replaying the game, just at the wrong moment. Now, this was at least two years ago when I saw the replay, but I seem to remember seeing a visit then. I don’t remember it from seeing the game the first time.

Whether or not Baker messed up here is debatable, but there are much more compelling arguments against him. I think the beginning of the end was in mid-summer 2004 (at work and don’t want to look up the exact date), when LaTroy Hawkins metled down and wanted a piece of the umpire. It took the entire coaching staff to restrain Hawkins — a total display of disrespect for authority — and Baker said nothing about it.

In my opinion, the biggest culprit in game 6 was Moises Alou and his hissy fit. Moises was as old as Moses even then, and should have known better. There are a lot of others that share the blame, and I think the culpability of those on the field (Prior, Gonzalez, Farnsworth) is higher than that of Baker.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 8:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Alou shouldn't have had the hissy fit, true.

But had Baker actually LED his team by settling down his pitcher or getting a fresh arm in the game, I think the Cubs would have won it.

You’re right about the 2004 team, too. That was a talented team that should have won 90+ games. Instead, it was about the most dysfunctional good team I have ever seen.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we essentially agree on the crux of the argument

Baker wasn’t all that we’d thought.

And, I’m willing to concede that he could have handled the specific situation better. But, in the case of changing pitchers, I think that’s 20/20 hindsight. In all honesty, were you looking for a pitching change? I wasn’t.

To me, the bottom line of the 2003 NLCS is that the players didn’t get it done. Actually, I think a better example of Dusty screwing up was preferring to pitch to Mike Lowell over Lenny Harris in game 1. We all remember game 6, but the Cubs should have won game 1, as well.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 8:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I was looking for a pitching change.

Prior at 100 pitches, the tying run at the plate, and the middle of the Marlins order up. Perfect situation to get a fresh arm in there.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Alright, I believe you

I suspect a lot of people who question the lack of a move years later weren’t looking for one at the time.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One thing I can definitely tell you

Everyone in Messner’s on Southport was screaming at the televisions for a pitching change.

They’d done the same thing in Game 2, when Dusty let Prior start the 8th inning with 105-ish pitches thrown, leading 12-2.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Game 2, I was also screaming for one

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention, where was Dusty in Prior's previous start?

The Cubs were nursing an 10 run lead, and Dusty allowed Prior to start the 8th inning with over 100 pitches already in the bank.

He should have been fired at that moment. In all honesty, that was the precise moment when I realized that he was an idiot, and should not be in charge of nine-figures worth of employees.

Dusty was hell-bent on simultaneously destroying the Cubs’ present and future, with his incomprehensible in-game strategies, and his apostasy regarding pitch counts.

He would intentionally do the “incorrect” thing, just on the off chance that it might work, in which case he’d look super-smart.

As a manager, he’s a virus. He’ll leaves organizations battered and bloodied, and destroys young men’s careers and strips them of their livelihoods. It takes several years, or a massive infusion of cash, for the effects of Dusty to wear off.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In hindsight...

…it certainly seems like the best thing to do, but is not always as easy decision to make during the heat of the moment. Many a manager have chosen to leave their ace in during crucial times in big games and Baker is not the only one guilty of this. That same year, Grady stuck with Pedro against the Yanks and they ran into the same problem. IMO, Jim Frey leaving in Sutcliffe in game 5 in 1984 was a bigger blunder and also Baker not getting Wood out of game seven sooner (and not bringing in Clement). It really comes down to this; do you want to put the game on Borowski’s shoulders or a guy who was your horse and pitching well on that particular night. 100 pitches was really no big deal and especially not on a cool night.

To me, the place Baker screwed up was not in leaving Prior in, but not going out to the mound right after the Bartman thing and simply breaking the ice. The way Prior was throwing, a few minutes to gather himself may have been all he needed to get out of that inning.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Jan 27, 2009 11:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe.

The point is, Baker did nothing. That lack of action probably cost the Cubs the game and the series.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 11:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Paralysis by analysis?

Just a year earlier, Dusty had been criticized for pulling Russ Ortiz too early in Game 6 of the World Series (and giving him the baseball).

Could it be that Dusty didn’t want to go to Borowski too early and be criticized again? I don’t think it was the right decision to leave Prior in, but I wonder how much the 2002 World Series affected his decision-making.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Jan 27, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's possible.

That’s another sign of bad managing, second-guessing yourself too much.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

In the biggest (or second biggest) moment of his managerial career, Dusty Baker froze. And that, in and of itself, is inexcusable.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Jan 27, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ironically, it seems like Lou managed this past year in the same way

overreacting to the Zambrano criticism, that he was thinking too far ahead when he needed to win the game in front of him. I don’t think second-guessing is the problem, so much as overreacting. It’s good to question yourself in private, but then lead with confidence. Lou shows more confidence than Dusty, to my eyes.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 1:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking the same thing.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Jan 27, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would second that.

Lou does seem to project an air of confidence (Cubbie swagger, if you will), but he did seem to overreact to the 2007 criticism this year.

Hopefully he finds the middle (and successful ground) this season.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Jan 27, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 for the middle ground

I think he will find it.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 6:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Baker checked out on multiple times he should have gone out

He could have gone out and calmed down Prior. But after Alou threw his fit, that would have been a good time to calm everybody down. There were 2-3 instances before Prior really hit trouble that would have been good opportunities for Baker to calm his players or at least try to slow the game down, and he didn’t.

And I don’t remember Rothschild going out there, either. I don’t remember any coach making a move until the game was tied.

by JDay on Jan 28, 2009 5:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Rothschild did come out after Castillo walked.

I just watched this game a couple of months ago when I was in a self-destructive mood one night. I was home alone with a 12-pack of beer in the refrigerator. Plus, I had not watched the game in five years and I wanted to make sure I had all of my facts straight regarding the 8th inning. Rothschild did come out to try to settle down Prior.
Here’s the thing: if Dusty takes Prior out, and the Marlins came back and won against the Cubs bullpen after Prior had been so dominant all night, he probably would have been fired after the ‘03 season the way Grady Little was. You also have to remember that except for Borowski and at times, Mike Remlinger and Kyle Farnsworth, we had a shaky bullpen at best that year. Only Farnsworth was warmed up when “the incident” happened, and I’m not sure I would have trusted him. If I’m going down with the ship, I want my best pitcher out there, and that guy was Prior in ‘03. The booted grounder by Alex Gonzalez was the biggest play, by far. I mean, it’s not even close. Even if Gonzalez only got one on that play, Jeff Conine hit a sac fly to right field, which would have ended the inning also.

"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Feb 5, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No one came out until all hell broke loose

And this was different. 1. Playoffs….clinching game….HIGHLY unusual incident….LF became unglued….normally calm SP showing WAY more emotion. It’s called a momentum shift and if you’ve ever played in these kinds of games, you’d know that momentum shifts are HUGE. The fact he sat on his ass and didn’t do a damn thing tells me he wasn’t really tuned in to the entire situation.

Should Alou have not done what he did? Of course. But’s its the coaching staff’s responsibility to maintain and restore order. They did not do this. Can’t tell what would have happened if Dusty came out.

As for getting them that far initially, no one can say who else would have done any better. I’d be willing to bet a LaRussa, Torre, McKeon, Scioscia, Francona would know how to handle a pressure situation.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Jan 27, 2009 8:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't disagree that it's different

But I’m not willing to lay the blame squarely on the manager. A veteran like Alou should know better.

Again, I think there are better arguments against Baker to be had — and how many people here honestly blamed Baker when it happened, vs. after he was let go?

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gonzales

I’ll see Gonzales’s error in my head forever.

by Jasely on Jan 27, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One of his best years fielding, too.

There was a decent case for him to get a Gold Glove.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When Gonzalez made that error

it became sickeningly obvious just how "tight’ this team was.

I’ll never forget turning to my girlfriend and saying, “That’s it. It’s over. The game. The playoffs, the dream, etc.”

Almost six years later it still hurts.

by bluekoolaide on Jan 27, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Surreal

That whole inning. It was like a cloud moved over the park.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and we

still choked away game 7

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which, sad to say,

i pretty much thought was a foregone conclusion.

by bluekoolaide on Jan 27, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I remember being at work the day of game 7 with this contant ominous feeling hovering over me. Even when Wood homered to put the Cubs up 5-3, I had the feeling we were going to lose.

If we feel this way, imagine the players, both then and now (i.e., the pressure). Of course, that pressure is why they make seven figure salaries, and I don’t.

Man, this was a painful thread to read.

IF IT TAKES FOREVER!!

by Cubfansince1957 on Jan 27, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I felt the same way before the game.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If it's any consolation...

…Dusty did introduce me to these toothpicks in Wojciechowski’s book Cubs Nation. I love those toothpicks. Greatest thing Dusty ever gave me.

Dan

Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

by dtpollitt on Jan 27, 2009 8:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Please don't tell me

You always have one in your mouth?

I mean your not like walking around the office chompin’ on a toothpick calling co-workers “slim” and “ace” are ya?

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No

Shooter, Maverick, or Suzie Q.

Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

by dtpollitt on Jan 27, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I too Al

defended Dusty for too long. I put a lot of the blame on Hendry for giving him little to work with and not putting his foot down in acquiring players that have been on your can of worms list. The incident of not going to the mound in that famous inning was the killer for Dusty. Had we kept the damage minimal, we may have made the promised land.

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Jan 27, 2009 8:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Question:

Which quote is not Dusty’s?

1. "They police themselves, but they don’t police themselves the way we used to police ourselves."

2. "I talked to him last night, and he said this is the first time he’s been in a playoff situation. He’s looking forward to it, and he told me he was sorry he didn’t help us and play better while he was here. I told him to enjoy it —he picked up a lot of games in the standings."

3. "They found every hole. We helped them with a couple of errors, and we weren’t doing it offensively."

4. "You can tell your uncle stuff that you could not tell your dad. That is kind of the role of an uncle. I feel very much like a father sometimes but sometimes I feel like a teammate."

by N Oakley on Jan 27, 2009 8:40 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

#3?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll wait a little while and see if anyone else has a guess.

I will add my $.02. Watching Dusty in SF all those years on national broadcasts, the 1998 play in game, interviews, etc. I formed the opinion that Dusty was a deep thinking, strategic manager. He appeard a man versed in handing the egos in the clubhouse, moving the chess pieces on the field, and experienced in handling the press.

I was wrong on all counts. Dusty is an intellectual and deep thinking man, but not about what happens on the field. He lets his guys play and prefers hits to walks. He relies on the players to police the clubhouse and hates to be questioned by the press.

He was a horrible fit for the Chicago Cubs.

by N Oakley on Jan 27, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

He actually was a good fit for that 2003 team, which had strong player-leaders in Eric Karros and Damian Miller, who did police that clubhouse.

With Miller and Karros gone in 2004, the inmates ran the asylum, with predictable results.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He is/was the worst....

at managing a pitching staff in the history of baseball

If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.

by Clutche on Jan 27, 2009 8:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, that's a really broad statement.

I can think of other managers who were as bad. Chuck Tanner, for one.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A close second maybe....

If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.

by Clutche on Jan 27, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but at least Tanner won a World Series (1979)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True.

He’s just one example. There are plenty of others.

Here’s a Cub example: Don Zimmer.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but he's so cuuuuuuuuutttttttteeeee.... ;-)

…and tells great stories!

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Obviously, none of his stories are about his handling of a pitching staff.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not a fair comparison

He has a plate in is head

If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.

by Clutche on Jan 27, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually not true

He has buttons in his head.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Manager of the year

If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.

by Clutche on Jan 27, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So was Baker

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll admit it...

I defended Dusty for way too long too. After 2003 I got spoiled, I had high hopes as all of us had and yes any mention of game 6 opens old wounds that have yet to fully heal.

2004 was a different story, great team on paper of course and I do blame Dusty for the whole collapse. After that he was done. Enuff said.

You ARE freaking out MAN!

by crw89 on Jan 27, 2009 8:48 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

This is the only evidence you need

Mark Prior pitch counts in Sep 2003

Sep 1: 130 Pitches (8 innings, in a game that was 6-0 after the 5th)
Sep 6: 129 Pitches (7 innings)
Sep 11: 110 Pitches (in 5.2 innings)
Sep 16: 124 Pitches (in 8.2 innings)
Sep 21: 131 Pitches (in 7.2 innings)
Sep 27: 133 Pitched (in 6.2 innings)

Not only that, but it was his first full year pitching in the majors.

Some people have 3 layers, like pie. Blog Blog Blog

by berselius on Jan 27, 2009 8:48 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Don't forget...

… that Baker left him in game 2 of the NLCS, to throw 7 innings and 115 pitches, in a game the Cubs were leading 11-0 after five.

Prior should have been taken out after the fifth. If there’s any situation to give four relievers an inning each, that’s it.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree about game 2

But also remember, they had a LOUSY bullpen. He leaned pretty hard on Wood and Prior, but if he doesn’t, they probably finish 2nd in the Central.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this is where it gets funny

Many two seasons ago ripped Lou for not sticking with Z and saving his arm for game 4, now ripping Dusty for sticking with Prior and Wood.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 8:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

An excellent point

Plus, those who rip Piniella conveniently forget that you need to score runs to win . . . and the Cubs did neither.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lou put Marmol...

… in the same situation in which he had succeeded all year. Marmol just failed at the worst possible time.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I had no problems with the move.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Neither did I.

It just didn’t work. That happens, sometimes.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The lousy 'pen was partially Dusty's fault.

Dusty couldn’t get anything out of Juan Cruz, who has been a very good reliever under every other manager he played for.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They were up 12-2 in the 8th!

If your bullpen cannot hold a 10 run lead for 6 outs, you are not going to win the title.

For crying out loud, Prior had thrown 100+ pitches through 7, with a 10 run lead!

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I said I agreed about game 2

The point about the bullpen was in reference to the stretch

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

*

stretch run .. . and game 6

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And for what it's worth

133 pitches in an Oct 3 shutout of Maddux and the Braves
116 pitches of a 12-3 blowout of the Marlins on Oct 8
And we all know what happened in the Bartman game

Some people have 3 layers, like pie. Blog Blog Blog

by berselius on Jan 27, 2009 8:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+2003 and rec'd

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, better to refer to it as the Gonzalez game

Since that’s what really blew it open. I will now light myself on fire.

Some people have 3 layers, like pie. Blog Blog Blog

by berselius on Jan 27, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

can i ask

why did my comment turn green lol

i have seen that happen a few times, but never asked why, and since it is now my comment that went green, I am further curious

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it's green with envy

it wishes it were a comment in a fanpost about Peavy or Robers, instead of stuck in some front page story about Game 6…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ROFL!

Actually, it’s green because 3 people heartily agreed with you to the point where they recommended it (click on actions) to others.

"Truth does not do as much good in the world as the semblance of truth does evil," - Duc de La Rochefoucauld, Maxims, 64.

by Emelie on Jan 27, 2009 10:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

gotcha...

thanks for explaining

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

Pitchers should be able to throw 130 pitches a game. Look at how many pitches a game they used to throw with a 4 man rotation. The pitch count crap is over rated in the season IMO. And yes I was a pitcher in HS and I had no pitch count, just the stupid inning count.

Too many pitchers have arm problems NOT because of the amount of pitches, but lack of taking care of their arm proper between strts. The more you toss on the side during off days, the better it is for your arm, since it does not allow it to tighten up, rather keeping it loose and ready to go.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 8:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but

Mark Prior was not pitching against high schoolers. The 4 man rotation (and less) worked in those eras because they didn’t have to worry about second basemen with doubles power, so they didn’t have to ma out on their pitches…not to mention the fact that pitchers of that era were not strikeout pitchers in the same way that power pitchers are today. It’s a matter of debate whether pitchers can or should pitch that many pitches (and I agree with you that they could), but it’s a matter of how pitchers are broken in to it. It’s a credit to Prior that he was able to keep that streak going for so long.

Some people have 3 layers, like pie. Blog Blog Blog

by berselius on Jan 27, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

they were not strike out pitchers in a 4 man rotation?

to name a few real fast

Nolan Ryan
Fergie Jenkins
Roger Clemens
Sandy Koufax
Tom Seaver

Each of them pitched in a four man rotation (sure Clemens later moved into the 5 man). Each of them threw a lot of strike outs annually. So you cannot use the strike out totals in your argument.

Regarding the power of players today, that has nothing to do with not keeping your arm loose. Why was it that Nolan could throw 200 pitches in a game, and not have any arm problems? His arm never got tight and stiff, since he kept it loose. The hard throwing is all well and good, but to do so without injuries you cannot let the arm get stiff. It is like a marathon runner, he cannot run once a week and expect to be able to avoid tightening up on a 5K run.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 9:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nolan Ryan was a freak.

For every Ryan, there are three guys like Dennis Leonard, Steve Busby and Don Gullett, who got overused and had careers ruined by arm trouble.

The problem is, pitchers are babied from the time they sign pro contracts these days. You’ll never get the entire industry to change course in 2009.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

true

but to say that strike out pithcers didnt exist prior to the 5 man rotation as they do now is inaccurate, and is not a valid argument in regards to pitchers having injuries this day in age. it is more the conditioning being changed so much from then to now. they need to keep the arm loose, instead of letting it tighten up. that can be blamed on both the player and the coach.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say that, did I?

How do you know pitchers aren’t keeping their arms loose? Throwing 50-60 extra pitches in an outing isn’t going to do that, all it’s going to do is fatigue you and put more stress on the joints.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but

not throwing each day is where it tightens up.

if you take days off between throwing, your arm will fatigue easier over a season. Fergue jenkins has gone over this time adn time again in detail, explaining that pitchers need to throw 365 days a year, even if only light toss to keep the muscles and joints loose in the arm, and that is why he (and others) avoided having injuries from pitching. Nolan Ryan has stated he 100% agrees regarding that.

If my memory serves correct, the routine for many pitchers is:
   Day 1 Pitch
   Day 2 No throwing
   Day 3 short and long toss
   Day 4 short and long toss, bullpen session
   Day 5 short and long toss, bullpen session
   Day 6 Pitch

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget running on days in between, too.

The running helps circulate the blood, which helps the muscle repair itself and keeps the arm fresher.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Jan 27, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think everyone can do it

Zambrano can do it, as can some other power pitchers, but for the most part I think it’s pretty rare. I think it would more likely to see junkballers/extreme control pitchers like Maddux or Moyer than most strikeout guys, because they can get people out without their arms falling off.

For the most part the organizational shift towards fewer pitches is due to teams covering their asses and advances in medical tech. When there were fewer teams they just tossed guys into the fire, and the good pitchers would emerge. But you would often not have true rotations – you would have a few ridiculous horses like Seaver and others (who would also run out of gas from being overused) and a bunch of scrubs that were arm injuries waiting to happen. Now if you can baby your merely good pitchers along, you get more innings out of them than if they were to blow out their arms.

We must remember too that this was Prior’s full season – he had only pitched 1 year of pro ball before this and ramped his inning count up by 50 (not including the postseason). I think he could have been one of those guys who could have stuck in a 4-man rotation, but that’s something you gotta build up to in the minors/early majors, and Prior did not have that time.

Some people have 3 layers, like pie. Blog Blog Blog

by berselius on Jan 27, 2009 10:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, because no one blew their arms out in old times.

Take your argument up with Jim Bouton.

The reason no one remembers all the promising young starters who blew their arms out back in the 4-man rotation days is because they all retired and disappeared.

Some guys can handle a huge workload. Others cannot. There’s no reason to push everyone to the breaking point just to see who breaks.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 11:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am not saying

no one had arm troubles, but the conditioning (or lack thereof) has caused more injuries in this age of baseball, and it is not just my opinioin, but many vets have said the same

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There are still a bunch of high-IP workhorses.

There are more teams today than there were in the 4-man rotation era, and pitchers are facing better, stronger hitters, and throwing more pitches under duress.

Even today, there are a ton of super-workhorses who can handle high pitch counts, or high inning counts, and tons of abuse. CC Sabathia. Brandon Webb. Livan Hernandez. Curt Schilling. Roy Halladay. Johan Santana.

And true, once a player passes the age of 25, statistically, they’re out of the “super danger zone”. But there’s no reason to unnecessarily risk such a valuable asset.

Back in the old days, there were ace workhorses and journeyman workhorses on MLB rosters…. and a junkyard filled with discarded fireballers who blew out their arms.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

People studied this.

https://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=1596&sessionstatus=notloggedin&mode=login

I would also like the point out the difference between 130 pitches for a 23 year old pitcher in his first full season compared to a 30 year old pitcher who’s been around the majors for a while.

by AceRockolla on Jan 27, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nice find

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In Dusty's defense...

And I hate starting a sentence off with those words…………

But, no one was complaining about Prior’s pitch counts down the stretch ni 2003. He, along with the rest of the rotation, carried us to the playoffs.

by kanderber on Jan 27, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I believe there was a lot of talk about the pitch counts and what the long term ramifications

might be. There were definitely two schools of thought: 1. Just win dammit, and 2 was oh boy, what will this do to him long term.

by N Oakley on Jan 27, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty believed myths, legends and human BS

It connects with many superstitious ball player and sport writer lore but it falls on its face when it comes to reality.

Momentum is a funny thing, it turns on a dime and tactical coaching/managing is about recognizing this at moments of a critical juncture….Once that incident happened Baker had to take the pressure off his players….all of them.

He first should have gone out and argued the dickens with the umps….taking the pressure off of Alou….blame the umps….

Then gone to the mound and done the old Gene Hackman bit in the movie Hoosiers and get Prior and his ball club refocused. Should have told Priot strike out the putce, but no Baker sat hoping for devine intervention or some voodoo dust or something

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Jan 27, 2009 8:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Dusty

Was the wrong choice, when SF fired him, he should not have been interview for starters. He IS one of the best at preparing for a game, but between the white lines he is horrible.

This can of worms (on a toothpick) is a real sour one for many here I am sure. Dusty gets blamed for some things he does not deserve, but there is a lot he is more than derserving for.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 8:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Game 6

It could possibly be one of the worst nights of my life. I could not fall asleep that night replaying in my head that 8th inning.

This inning I watched again on YouTube a couple years ago and had to stop watching because it was too painful. I am not sure if it is still there, I am afraid to look.

Favorite Game - 'The Sandberg game" June 23, 1984

by Cub Fan Mike on Jan 27, 2009 8:58 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

okay, since everyone keeps bringing up Game 6...

…I blame the ump for not calling fan interference.

Can anyone definitively say the foul ball was NOT in the field of play when Bartman and friends reached out and touched it? I don’t believe there was an “end zone line” camera angle which would have easily shown if the ball ‘broke the plane’ or not. But every replay and photo I’ve seen, it sure looks like the fans were reaching out past the wall and definitely interfered with Moises’ chance to catch the ball.

I respect most folks’ opinions here, so I welcome your thoughts and recollections here. Probably won’t change my mind, but I’d like to hear what others think.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:24 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Alou was quoted a year or so ago...

… as saying he would have had no chance to catch the ball anyway. But maybe that’s 20/20 hindsight.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, I remember that whole "he said, he unsaid" story a year ago.

Started with an elevator comment in passing IIRC, and then several more conflicting quotes in newspaper articles at which point I had no idea what the real story was.

Again, going back to replays and pictures, let’s just say that Bartman and everyone around him stay completely in their seats the whole time. There’s no way Alou doesn’t catch that ball. So really the only issue in my mind is did the ball break the plane or not. i don’t think it did.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So what are you saying when you say "break the plane"?

Do you mean you think it was IN the seats? Or not?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Judge for ourselves...

I’ve always thought Alou would of made the catch, personally.

by dorf on Jan 27, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not.

but Shangai’s comment below about why did Moises jump is giving me pause to think…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lots of thoughts

— If it wasn’t in the seats, why did Moises jump?
— I think that there was a better than 50% chance that he catches it if no one reaches for it.
— Bartman wasn’t the only one reaching.
— The incident only opened the door. The Cubs had plenty of chances to close it.
— The Sun-Times had no valid reason for printing Bartman’s personal info.
— Bartman has been unfairly villified.
— Alou should let it go.

Having said all that, I do disagree with the sentiment that any of us would have done the same. Remember Trot Nixon 3 days earlier? Situational awareness . . . if I’m in the front row, I know that a fielder has a chance to make a play on any ball in front of me.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   2 recs

Look at the photo.

You say you would have had “situational awareness”, yet there are at least three other people reaching for the ball. It’s easy to say sitting at your computer, not necessarily so easy to do if you are right there and a baseball is flying your way.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When Nixon went into the Fenway bleachers

I said, look at that — they got out of his way. Cubs fans would probably try to catch the ball.

Game 6 wasn’t the first time that I’d seen that happen at Wrigley Field.

As I said, he wasn’t the only one reaching. Would I have gotten out of the way? Hell, yes. I didn’t play baseball at a high level competitively, but I still play softball — and I know what I’m going to (try to) do if the ball is hit to me before it’s pitched.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There are so many walls at Fenway...

… lower than the ones at Wrigley, particularly on Fenway’s 1B/RF side. Maybe the fans there are more used to getting out of the way.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Al, I've seen it happen on lower walls in Chicago

The Red Sox fans were more aware.

I’m not claiming I’m a better fan, smarter or more observant. And I’ve always thought Bartman got unfair treatment. But yes, I would have gotten out of the way.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Like I said...

… easy to say sitting at your computer, not so easy to do if you’re right there in the moment.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

But there is no way to prove it one way or the other, and since I know myself fairly well, that’s my story and I’m sticking to it. I don’t think that I’ve made too many “absolute” claims on this site. This is one that I’m making.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just like there is no way to prove

That you wanted a pitching change in the moment . . .

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And what's really irritating...

Is that you still see people interfering along the walls in similar fasion every year. You’d think a high profile incident like this would be some sort of lesson.

by dorf on Jan 27, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

Weren’t there two situations in one week in 2007?

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

For the record

I hope that I can be as ballsy as “guy with hands over face” and move out of the way if I’m ever in that situation! I would have said as ballsy as Badger — but thats asking to much.

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, ballsy would be if I'd said

That I would have knocked the others out of Moises’ way, too!

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

But seriously, don’t you think if Bartman had moved back “guy in gray sweatshirt” would have grabbed for it anyway? Or worse “guy with hands over face” would have grown a pair and attempted to snag it away from Alou it a display of manly power?

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, it appears "guy with hands over face"

was not nutless, but attempting to give Moises the room to make a play.

by N Oakley on Jan 27, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know I know

Just trying to lighten the mood. Quite frankly I guess I got distracted by the guy with the collar busted up outside his jersey — burgandy no less!

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If you read what my original post said

You will see that I noted that others were reaching and that Bartman has been unfairly blamed.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know I read it

But I was just being a smart ass – my bad. However, the point I was trying to make (I think) was that IMO, you would be in the minority in terms of moving out of the way. Now if the section was full of BCBers maybe it would be different. But average fans probably would have dived for it.

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No worries . . . I've been known to be a smartss

Just missed it.

Yeah, you’re probably right on me being in the minority. And, it probably wouldn’t have mattered — there were plenty of people going for it, as you said.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

From my recollection

When I saw the replay of the “incident”, it was the guy in the grey jacket that first reached for the ball. Now, if you were listening to the game, presumably Bartman was, and you saw the guy next to you go after a foul ball, wouldn’t you to? I’m not sure that I wouldn’t have done the same thing.

I, however, do not believe the Moises Alou would’ve caught the ball if there was no interference.

by dansram on Jan 28, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Any umpires out there? What exactly is the "fan interference" rule?

I’m assuming there’s some sort of imaginary vertical plane involved, extending upwards from wherever the field of play ends and the seating area begins.

So what triggers the rule? Is it when fans reach out into the field and interfere with the player, regardless of where the ball is?
Or is it solely dependent on where the ball is – if it stays on the field side, it’s interference, if it crosses the plane, anything goes?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m pretty sure that once the ball is on the fan side of the wall anything goes, and that if the fan reaches out over the field of play it’s interference. Does the field of play end at the face of the wall? Midpoint of the wall? I don’t know. I swear there’s another angle looking down the wall and the ball is directly over the rail.

by dorf on Jan 27, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Per the MLB Defination out of the Rulebook

When there is spectator interference with any thrown or batted ball, the ball shall be dead at the moment of interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in his opinion will nullify the act of interference.
APPROVED RULING: If spectator interference clearly prevents a fielder from catching a fly ball, the umpire shall declare the batter out.
Rule 3.16 Comment: There is a difference between a ball which has been thrown or batted into the stands, touching a spectator thereby being out of play even though it rebounds onto the field and a spectator going onto the field or reaching over, under or through a barrier and touching a ball in play or touching or otherwise interfering with a player. In the latter case it is clearly intentional and shall be dealt
Rule 3.16 to 3.18
32
with as intentional interference as in Rule 3.15. Batter and runners shall be placed where in the umpire’s judgment they would have been had the interference not occurred.
No interference shall be allowed when a fielder reaches over a fence, railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does so at his own risk. However, should a spectator reach out on the playing field side of such fence, railing or rope, and plainly prevent the fielder from catching the ball, then the batsman should be called out for the spectator’s interference.
Example: Runner on third base, one out and a batter hits a fly ball deep to the outfield (fair or foul). Spectator clearly interferes with the outfielder attempting to catch the fly ball. Umpire calls the batter out for spectator interference. Ball is dead at the time of the call. Umpire decides that because of the distance the ball was hit, the runner on third base would have scored after the catch if the fielder had caught the ball which was interfered with, therefore, the runner is permitted to score. This might not be the case if such fly ball was interfered with a short distance from home plate.

Linky

"When two Whales Fight, many Shrimp Die" - Korean Proverb

by TheRiot Police on Jan 27, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I swore I'd stop the Soriano bashing...

but I just realized that if he was playing left that night the Bartman controversy would not exist….because he would have pulled up six feet short of the wall

If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.

by Clutche on Jan 27, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

pete's sake.

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella

by drewishdrewid on Jan 27, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but his hop

might have allowed him to go over the wall

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

interesting - it's more about the fans and players than it is about the ball

I was hoping that last paragraph would provide a definitive answer but the way I read it, both scenarios might have occurred.

By jumping up, one could assume that Moises’ arm or glove might have gone over the wall and per the rule book – no interference, he does so at his own risk. However, one could also assume that Bartman might have clearly reached over the wall in going for the ball and per rule book – batsman should be called out.

I feel for Bartman and I’ve met Moises so I’ll stick with my original stance. I blame the ump! ;-)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jan 27, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

dusty:(

dusty made a lot of us sound like idiots in defending him, i remember having to explain the clog the bases comments to my then g/f at the time without making it sound ridiculous and stupid, one of my greater accomplishments, now I spout to the same girl about rc/27 and OBP, thank god we finally did something and stopped giving him a pass for ‘how far’ he took us one year.

'talkin 'bout practice?

by CubFanRaysaddict on Jan 27, 2009 9:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

where to start ...

Dusty’s actions in Game 6 were stupid. But his actions in the final week of 2004 were more unforgivable, IMO, because they cost the Cubs the wild card AND led to a downturn for the team for two years. Farnsworth, Sosa, Alou and Mercker all had to go — and they were replaced by inferior players (Novoa, Burnitz, Hollandsworth … ).

The roots of that, I think, started in the 2003-04 offseason, when the Cubs made a lot of moves that were praised but ultimately backfired. Getting Maddux and Lee obviously worked out, but letting Lofton go and trading Damian Miller cost the Cubs leadership, OBP and good game-calling. Eric Karros was clearly done, but the Cubs never replaced his leadership in the clubhouse — and Dusty clearly wasn’t up to the task.

It would be interesting to know how many of the personnel moves in those years were influenced by Dusty. Clearly, he mismanaged the guys he had in 2004-06 (overplaying Neifi and Novoa, misusing Patterson) but if he inspired of a lot of the moves after 2003, he’s even MORE to blame.

by elgato on Jan 27, 2009 9:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think MOST of the player personnel decisions were influenced by Baker.

Jim Hendry gave him far too much leeway in choosing his roster.

You’re right that Baker is mostly responsible for the 2004 meltdown. However, had they made the WS in 2003 — maybe we’d have been more forgiving of that, or maybe that would have led to circumstances that would have avoided the meltdown.

We’ll never know, unfortunately.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

what's funny ...

is that you could argue that Dusty did very well with the 2004 team up until the final week. His two best pitchers missed much of the year, Clement turned into a pumpkin, Borowski got hurt, Sosa seriously declined, the Nomar acquisition didn’t help much — AND the Cubs were still in the wild card lead with a week to play with most of their guys healthy. Dusty, for about four months, weathered the storm — even if the clubhouse was an issue.

Then, all hell breaks loose! Victor Diaz, Maddux and the bullpen getting crushed by the Reds, no run support in Prior’s 16-strikeout game, the Braves getting revenge on Wood, the fighting between Dusty and Steve Stone …

Al, I guess I disagree with you on which was worse (Dusty in ‘03 or Dusty in ’04) because I can almost forgive Dusty for being dazed for a few minutes on a cold October night. But for 10 days in a pennant race? That’s bad on it’s own — it’s even worse if viewed after the NLCS.

by elgato on Jan 27, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Being dazed for a few minutes on a cold October night".

That’s exactly when a manager should be his MOST focused.

It wasn’t that cold that night, either.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I essentially agree

I’m not saying I can forgive Dusty. I’m saying I almost could — and that the 2004 was a greater transgression in my view.

by elgato on Jan 27, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed!

well said, and now Dusty will ask to have you fired from blogging…..

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 12:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

Wish I could rec it a hundred times. Well said

"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett

by The Ryno and I Know on Jan 27, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

very good points

Dusty did let a lot of things simmer, and they came to a boil in the final week or so. I guess I’m just saying that on paper, Dusty got the team through a ton of injuries to get the wild card lead.

For the record, I wasn’t trying to defend the man. I tried to couch my comment with “you could argue.”

by elgato on Jan 27, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Game 7

I was screaming at the TV when Dusty did not replace Kerry Wood with Matt Clement in the fifth inning when the Marlins retook the lead. Baker left Wood in that game way too long. McKeon didn’t waste any time putting Josh Beckett in that game for Florida.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jan 27, 2009 10:42 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

good point

Game 6 is the one that’s remembered, but Game 7 was not Dusty’s finest hour, either.

by elgato on Jan 27, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Kinda

Like Buckner and Boston, another game 6 that is remembered, and game 7 that is forgotten

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Game 7 of the 1986 World Series

The Red Sox had a 3-0 lead in that game before losing.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jan 27, 2009 10:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And a 2-run lead in the ninth, game 6

With two out and none on — the Mets tied it before Buckner’s error. No one remembers that, either.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bob Stanley "Wild" Pitch

The tying run in the 10th inning of game 6 scored on a “wild” pitch by Bob Stanley against Mookie Wilson. It was an inside pitch that some think Rich Gedman should have caught.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jan 27, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

I also hold Miller a little responsible for game 7. He should have went to Dusty/Larry and said that Kerry just does not have it tonight…get somebody else ready. It was clear very early on that he just did not have good stuff. I guess I don’t know that he did not do that but I feel better with myself passing the blame onto multiple people.

"When two Whales Fight, many Shrimp Die" - Korean Proverb

by TheRiot Police on Jan 27, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Finally

I was reading this diary and wondering when Game 7 was going to be raised. Baker was just as bad in Game 7. There is absolutely no way you let Wood give up that lead when he obviously didn’t have his best stuff. Matt Clement should have been in that game. I was screaming at the TV in that game more than Game 6.

McKeon brought in Penny in relief but Dusty just couldn’t see out of his box.

by rlpete on Jan 27, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right on

I had the exact same reaction: screaming at the tv to put Clement in. That should have been a no brainer.

God bless Woody for giving his all that game on a night when he clearly didn’t have it, and for taking responsibility afterward.

by JDay on Jan 28, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Game 6, I will always remember as the Gonzalez game.

He is the one who blew it. An easy double play ball that would have ended the inning, even after the foul ball “debacle.”

As for Dusty, I gave up on the guy in 2004, and if you look at the team, our fielding stats got worse each year. It was clear that Dusty lost control of the team and was not interested in keeping his players sharp. I for one, hated all the mental errors (fielding and base running) that seemed to get worse with each day that Dusty ran the team.

The guy was a jerk who just sucked on toothpicks and ran out his contract. The slowly declining quality of the team’s play proved this (to me).

"When you are in a hole, stop digging." - anon.

by LAcarl519 on Jan 27, 2009 11:02 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

He was inept, yes

but i don’t think any of this makes him a jerk.

by TC Cubby on Jan 27, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

that's where you and I disagree.

I do not think Dusty was inept, as in incapable of doing better. I think he gave up on this team and was playing the string out in 2005-06. He dared Cub management to buy him out of his contract. He just kept doing the minimum expected of him and waited to be fired. Look at the stats and you will see a product that kept playing lower quality ball each year.

That is why I think Dusty was a jerk. He just dared management to fire him. I think management was jerks too for waiting until the end in 2006 to fire Dusty. Why they didn’t fire him during the season (in 2006) amazed me. Even an interim manager would have sent a better product on the field every day.

"When you are in a hole, stop digging." - anon.

by LAcarl519 on Jan 27, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We argued about this here at the time.

You’re right about daring them to fire him, which is maybe a good reason not to.

That 2006 team was horrible. NO ONE could have won games with that group.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

great minds think alike. :-)

(I beat your posting by one minute)

"When you are in a hole, stop digging." - anon.

by LAcarl519 on Jan 27, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AL...

Though I wish it never had to be written, this was the best “Can of Worms” piece you wrote. Sometimes, so little words can say so much.

One thing though…. i’m a bit saddened your closing your can. We never got to do LARRY HIMES….

by TheHawkRules on Jan 27, 2009 11:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

There's always next winter!

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

haha

OK…I’ll remember you saying that!

by TheHawkRules on Jan 27, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope I will, too!

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no doubt in my mind

Cubs win that game… they would’ve won the world series. Whoever came out of the National League was going to win the World Series. It was the NL’s year and it should’ve been the Cubs…damn it it should’ve be us.

Someday we'll go all the way.

by Cubbinstrongsince86 on Jan 27, 2009 11:14 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Remember, the foul ball incident was only game 6

we still had Wood to go in game 7. Bottom line is the managers don’t play the game, the players do. This loss is on the players, not Dusty.

by Cubs and Hawks fan on Jan 27, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Baker

IMO the biggest issue I had with him was the “us against the world” mentality that he encouraged. He bred an atmosphere where no one was responsible for anything and whenever anyone asked him a substantive question that tried to shed light on problems he’d respond with a “I don’t know, dude, man…”. He was reactive, not proactive, and his reactions almost always focused away from the problem to lift the burden on his players. Dusty was the example of the extreme players manager and was the ultimate manager for the steroid era.

by dmlichte on Jan 27, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Good points

I’d forgotten how much I hated his press conferences. Two in particular stand out from 2004 – one in which he disavowed the entire idea of pitchcounts and claimed that he could “tell” when a pitcher was laboring, and that he’d remove them at that point — and another, when a reporter called him out for a particularly egregious strategic error, and Dusty said something along the lines of “I am an MLB manager and you aren’t, and as such, I know more about this than you do, and I am right and you are wrong.”

He was bullheaded. He refused to listen to criticism — constructive or otherwise — and in fact, would become more set in his incorrect ways in an attempt to “prove the naysayers wrong.”

Thank goodness he’s gone. And I can’t imagine that Walt Jocketty is going to suffer his foolishness for very long, especially after having a front-row view of his idiocy from 2003-2006.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sigh.

This is so depressing. We need some baseball. Fast.

Ron Santo should sing TMOTTBG everyday. Period.

by Schwa on Jan 27, 2009 11:39 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

+1000

New sig currently under construction

by JB 23 on Jan 27, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yuppers

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pre Cub baker Foul Up

NEVER do what he did…..

In the World Series, he took the game ball, and gave it to the pitcher who was leaving the game. It maybe superstitious B.S. but it is something you do not do in a sport full of players who have goofy routines, and superstitions to prepare.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 11:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great point

It takes a special kind of awfulness to get yourself fired from a team that just won the pennant, doesn’t it?

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 12:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i have a question

how much of an on the field difference is there between Dusty and Lou? One of the grievances against Dusty is that he over uses his starting pitchers, but Lou isn’t exactly easy on young pitchers. I read an article on baseballperspcetus about Lou, (from his Seattle days), and it said that young pitchers are in trouble if Lou doesn’t like them and it is the kiss of death if he does, because he will ride a good young pitcher to death, the article was talking about Freddie Garcia. Garcia threw 201 innings in his rookie season. Lou hasn’t exactly been easy on Zambrano. Plus I would hate to be a young player under Lou, because he has no patients. It seems that he and Dusty share many negatives.

Lou is also an “old school” guy like Dusty. Lou isn’t real into stats and what not. Lou wouldn’t let the antics around the 2004 team occur, like Dusty did. I remember being flabbergasted when Mercker came out of the dugout, and than being completely shocked when Dusty allowed Mercker to call up to the booth. I would have told Mercker that he is paid to pitch while Steve Stone and Chip Carey are paid to talk about the game.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 11:55 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

There are some valid points in their use of pitchers

One big difference is that Piniella really seems to go with who is producing. He doesn’t seem to have a problem shaking things up if someone isn’t performing. Baker seemed to have his guys (Neifi being an example) and would continue to send them out there regardless.

by rlpete on Jan 27, 2009 12:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i watched Corey Patterson lead off this year

and Paul Bako catch the majority of the games.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Night and Day

Lou doesn’t handicap our team by benching 2-3 starters every game.

Lou generally makes the “smart” decision w/r/t in-game strategy, with the occasional unexpected swerve. Dusty would intentionally make the contrarian decision almost 100% of the time.

Lou knows his pitchers statistics, and the tendencies of our opponents. It took Dusty two years to recognize that Remlinger had reverse splits. Every so often, you’ll hear Lou referring to some pretty obscure match-up stats in his post-game pressers. He knows the stats.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lou DOES like to use his bench, though...

… to rest his regulars. The difference is, he has better bench players.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I remember when Lou was hired

he talked about one of the keys to winning at Wrigley Field was to have a strong bench and use it often. This is due to Wrigley having a much larger number of day games as compared to other teams.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 27, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

dusty still does that in cincinnati...

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If he does know the stats then he didn't want Cedeno to succeed

because Cedeno has reverse splits and Lou played him against LHPs most of the time.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There may have been a LH player

he wanted OUT of the lineup as opposed to wanting Cedeno IN the lineup.

Not sure if this was the case, but it’s a possibility.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Jan 27, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Game 1

When Dusty Pinella left a clearly struggling Dempster in the game after walking the bases loaded for a second time in the 5th inning, I turned off the TV and never watched another inning of the series. I knew right then and there, we had lost the series. It’ll take me a long, long time to think of Pinella as anything but Baker 2.0 from now on.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

by WayneCampbell08 on Jan 27, 2009 1:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

OBP

The biggest difference between Dusty and Lou is the way they value OBP. The increase in the Cubs’ OBP post-Dusty has been astounding. I believe that Corey Patterson would still be a viable MLer had Lou been the Cubs’ manager when Patterson came up.

There are other differences, but this is the biggest.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 1:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Only if Lou and the coaches could have convinced Patterson to take pitches.

Patterson was well-known for ignoring coaching advice.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 2:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that it is a lot easier to ignore

Dusty Baker than it is to ignore Lou Piniella. Maybe I’m wrong; I don’t know either personally.

Either way, Dusty Baker was the worst possible manager to bring up Corey. He didn’t see Corey’s weakness as a weakness and then put Corey in a position – lead-off hitter – that Corey was never going to succeed in.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 27, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yuck

The only thing I have to say on this subject is that Dusty Baker may suck, but he did help change the culture here and make us realize that the Cubs could win.
Of course he then imploded our pitching staff.

Let the Blaine Gabbert era begin.

by nji232 on Jan 27, 2009 12:05 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

VERY TRUE

he did give us a taste of victory, adn turned us into crazed lions on the hunt.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty Smith - Lovie Baker

Are two of the same when you think about it. Players “love” to play for them both. IMO it is because they are not held responsible, and their ego are gently massaged by them both. Neither can make an adjustment, both stick to their personal favorite players too long, blah, blah, blah

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 12:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I HAVE ALWAYS

said this too!!

Stubborn as old mules!!!

Cut from the same cloth, for better or worse.

by The E-Man on Jan 27, 2009 12:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i remember

sitting with freinds watching that game. We were talking about how long Prior would go. I said then and still think it now that they should have gotten Wood up and ready. I heard all about what about game 7. My point was, wood was the best thing we had next to prior that year. You have a lead and who better to go out and start the 7 or 8 then wood. his adreniline would have carried him easily. I always wondered what might have happend if wood would have started the 8th. You had a lead and we needed to end it then and there.

But then again, what do i know.

Let go cubs

by cubsfaninkc on Jan 27, 2009 12:13 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Not to say Dusty is free of blame

But how much blame being placed on Dusty is not his fault, and is placed on him due to needing someone or something to blame? He did not drop the ball at SS. He did not throw a hissy fit when a fan touched the ball. Of course these are only two examples, adn there are a lot of things to blame Dusty for. But had we won in 03, would it have mattered how many times he started Macias the next season, or how many times he hit and ran, or bunted with Neifi in the 9th with 2 outs (that one STILL makes me laugh).

just thinking outloud…….should this be in a peavy/roberts thread?

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 27, 2009 12:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Dusty had his lunch eaten

by Mc Keon (sp?) where he had starters warming up and relieving where we had f’ing Dave Veres (yeah he was ok in the regular season and sucked his previous NLCS efforts).

One cannot “save the guys for the next game” with the Cubs! See Lou Pienella for other examples of this.

In addition, LaRussa also out-managed Dusty in the WS.

I would say for the most part, managers do not make all that much difference in game outcomes, but the 2003 NLCS, I’m sorry Shanghai Badger, it is not debatable. Dusty sucked at the wrong time.

by The E-Man on Jan 27, 2009 12:32 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Baker Vs. LaRussa in Postseason

I firmly believe LaRussa is a better manager than Baker, but the only time they managed against each other in postseason play was 2002 when Dusty’s Giants beat LaRussa’s Cardinals.in the NLCS.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jan 27, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You are right..

I had thought that LaRussa was still in Oakland in 2002, when in fact it was Art “How are You?” Howe.

Sorry Dusty.

He did get out-managed that series, in any event.

I do not like LaRussa b/c I am mostly jealous that he always has the Cards sniffing around, but will admit he’s the best there is, imo.

by The E-Man on Jan 27, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mike Scioscia..

was the manager of the then-Anaheim Angels in the 2002 World Series.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd almost forgotten - Mark Guthrie in NLCS Game 1

Oh my GOD that was a horrible decision. It was as if Dusty hadn’t seen the previous 7 Guthrie outings, in which he had absolutely hit the wall.

Guthrie had been a very effective, if somewhat lucky, reliever in 2003.

However, in Guthrie’s final 7 outings of 2003, he faced 25 batters and allowed 13 of them to reach base. He posted 5 IP, a 9.00 ERA, 9 hits, 4 walks, 5 earned runs, allowed 8 of the 12 runners he inherited to score, and had hitters tattoo him for a remarkable .450 / .520 / .700 line, for a 1.220 OPS.

Then, in the NLDS Game 4 – 8th inning, 1 out, down 2 runs, Dusty called Guthries’ number for the first time in the postseason. (It was right after Fick tried to clothesline Karros and was ejected.)

Guthrie gets Furcal to fly out, then walks Marcus Giles, wild pitches him to 2nd, gives up a HR to Chipper, a double to Javy, and finally gets Andruw out. Still, the damage is done – 2 earned in .2 innings for Guthrie, and his horrid streak continues.

Frankly, Guthrie was in week 4 of an epic implosion that actually ended his career. He never pitched in MLB again.

So, after Sammy hit the game-tying HR with 2 out, 1 on, in the bottom of the 9th in NLCS Game 1 — who ya gonna call? Mark Guthrie.

(With, I might add, a completely unnecessary and counter-productive double-switch bringing Ramon Martinez into the game at SS for Alex Gonzalez, who was 3 for 5 with 3 RBI. Was Dusty really going to use Guthrie for 2 innings? Why not just PH for the pitcher’s spot in the bottom of the inning with Eric Karros!? ANSWER: Because Dusty is stupid, and believed that double-switching made him look smart.)

We all know how that turned out. First batter – Lowell put one into the CF bleachers. Guthrie is relieved by Alfonseca, and promptly retires.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And I disagree. The players lost

Did Baker blow a 4-0 lead in game 1? No, that was Carlos Zambrano.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Lowell-Harris thing was stupid

And I mentioned that well above.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 2:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So that's it?

Dusty Baker is the gargantuan nightcrawler at the bottom of the can? The man who should bear the brunt of our collective misery? The comments go on and on, as any good producer would hope, but I stopped reading them at the point where somebody posted that picture of the foul ball. Certainly, Baker bears some responsibilty for the Cubs’ most recent spectacular collapse but there’s also:

this past October…
and Jim Frey deciding to save Sutcliffe for Game 1 of the WS in ‘84
and Durocher never giving anybody a day off in ’69
and Grimm running Borowy out there for Game 7 in ’45
and Wilson losing a ball in the sun in ’29
and Kling’s signals being stolen in 1910…the 1909 team winning 100 games but somehow not the pennant…and wouldn’t ya know it, we’re right back to 1908.

So it goes.

For me, the one person that bears the most blame for the fact that the Cubs have played 100 consecutive seasons without a title is Philip K. Wrigley. And the most painful part of that assignment is that, absent P.K., most of us would never have known that utterly sublime feeling, sitting in the sun on a summer afternoon, talking to our fathers.

"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko

by LaddieRenfroe on Jan 27, 2009 2:36 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I did cover PK's failures...

… in the College of Coaches post; that failure set back a team that was producing talented young players (Santo, Williams, Brock, Ellsworth, others in that era).

But you’re right. Wrigley destroyed the team systematically in the 1950’s. They didn’t recover till he died and his son was forced to sell.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The mistakes began well before the 1950s...

Your college of coaches post deals, almost exclusively, with the nuts and bolts of that silly experiment and doesn’t touch on the vast majority of P.K. Wrigley’s tenure as owner.

The organization began to suffer from the moment that P.K. Wrigley inherited the team from his father, although the untimely death of Bill Veeck Sr. didn’t help matters. The College of Coaches was simply the most laughable, and thus most often-remembered, episode in a series of blunders. The Cubs were an incredibly successful organization from 1876 until the late 1930s but the atrophy began as soon as P.K. took control of the team and lasted for the rest of his lifetime.

For example, after Veeck Sr. died in 1933, P.K. hired a corporate executive named Bill Walker to be the Cubs GM. Walker had no baseball experience and it showed in his decisions. Some of those decisions included failing to build a farm system beyond the Wrigley’s mutual ownership of the Los Angeles PCL team and the spectacularly stupid Hurst-for-Camilli trade. In a few years, the Cubs went from being profligate powerhouse to a cheapskate organization relying on hair-brained “innovations.” The core talent of the late 1920s and early 1930s team remained intact in those pre-free-agency days and so the Cubs remained competitive on the field for a few years after P.K. took over. The war pennant, ‘45, was a fluke that masked the general disarray within the organization. The bad decisions that followed, in the 1950s, were the just the continuation of what had been happening for 20 years and what would continue to happen for 20 more. I’ll put it this way in terms of actual baseball players – Chuck Klein is to Ralph Kiner as Kiner is to Bobby Murcer, not as statistical comps but as evidence of what could be called an “organizational philosophy” of acquiring declining sluggers.

The way that P.K. treated the ballpark was every bit as eccentric as his management of the baseball operations. The only difference is that history looks quite kindly on P.K.’s preservation of Wrigley Field. And therein lies the great conundrum at the heart of the Chicago Cubs – was P.K. Wrigley a visionary for preserving the ballpark or was he a fool for his bungling oversight of the actual baseball team?

"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko

by LaddieRenfroe on Jan 27, 2009 4:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Clearly, he was both.

And your summary is excellent.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll always remember that night...

I was eleven years old (but perhaps the biggest Cubs fan you could possibly be at that age), watching with my grandpa, grandma, uncle, dad, and mother. We really thought this was it, and for most of the game, it was. Until that dreaded incident.

My grandpa kept asking “Why isn’t Dusty going out there? Why are they keeping him in there?” All legit questions, because Prior was still young and never had to deal with something like that before (let alone on 110+ some odd pitches) and needed to be relaxed. Joe Borowski was up in the pen who was consistent for us all year, I’m sure he was set to go after the whole incident.

Of course, none of what should’ve happened, happened. And we were all stunned at how the whole thing unfolded (not to mention, seeing the look on my grandfather’s face, after thinking maybe he’d finally catch a break as a fan, a look I never wanted to see again being the biggest Cubs fan I ever had the luxury of knowing). The sheer feeling of shock and utter disbelief can’t be put into terms. Nobody hardly spoke for the rest of that night, and I do recall all feeling of “belief” gone after that inning, despite still having a chance with Game 7.

Being forgiving, I gave Dusty a second chance in 2004, which he proceeded to screw up even worse. I personally loved Chip and Steve, the only voices I was familiar with as a Cubs fan all my life (except I DID have Harry in my first couple seasons). The fact that he drove them out of town was one of the most childish things I’d seen in the sport. Of course it wasn’t all him; Alou and Mercker were just as bad, and the fact that he didn’t control it was a HUGE error on his judgement. Instead, he joined them.

Like we’re supposed to believe the broadcasters were responsible for the team not getting the job done in the way they should have? Yeah, right. I believe Steve said that, on the day they lost a chance at Wild Card berth (another day I’ll never forget), the team should’ve won the Wild Card by six or seven games, and kept making excuses for their mistakes instead of fixing them. He was dead right, and still is. It’s why I can’t even stomach the THOUGHT of that 2004 team these days anymore. From the day Steve resigned, I pretty much despised Dusty as a manager, but not just because of Steve. It was proof that Dusty was willing to make up excuses for his players just so he or they don’t have to take the blame, which to me, is pathetic.

That whole thing, along with the 2003 NLCS catastrophe, really made me uninterested for the 2005 and 2006 seasons (had nothing to do with subpar campaigns). Those things, as well as my grandfather’s passing in summer 2005 (baseball was always our central interest, he taught me just about everything), made it very difficult for me to watch Cubs games until 3/4s of the way through 2006, the only time that’s ever happened to me in my life.

So Dusty has really left a negative impact on me as a Cubs fan, and I really can’t stand anything that has to do with him. I usually come to the Cubs to seek solace and I couldn’t even do THAT anymore because of the bitterness I had towards him. That may be childish, but whatever. Just glad that era was over two seasons ago…

by AeroZach on Jan 27, 2009 4:06 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Dusty was nothing but a convenient scapegoat in the 2003 NLCS...

and afterward in his years as the Cubs boss. The FACT remains that the Bartman ball was clearly fan interference. The ump didn’t get his butt down the line to make the call correctly. It should have been ruled fan interference and resulted in an out, per the rulebook. Dusty has a great track record, despite the demonizing of him on the post. He’s a winning manager, and a players’ manager- who knows how to get the best out of what he is given. It was a shameful display the way Dusty was run out of town, even though it was clearly his time to go.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Jan 27, 2009 4:20 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

Did you put on your “In Dusty We Trusty” t-shirt right before you posted that?

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

by WayneCampbell08 on Jan 27, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i've seen him in Cincinnati as a Reds fan

i am very unimpressed. I believe Corey Patterson lead off more than anybody else last season. Didn’t that experiment fail before 2005? The Reds batted out of order last year, the same thing happened when he was in Chicago and managing against the Reds. He mismanaged the bullpen in a 18 inning marathon against San Diego. Josh Fogg was the long man, he used Josh Fogg before using some of the other “short relievers”. Eventually he handed the ball to Harang, who threw 4 marvelous innings, but pitched 2 days prior, and pitched 3 days later. Harang hurt his elbow, missed over a month, and really was for the months of June, July and August, because he was either on the D.L. or pitching hurt.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Harang situation this year was pretty awful.

I don’t think that Dusty could have handled it worse. At a minimum, they should have used a spot starter to delay Harang’s next start, in order to avoid using their #1 starter three times in a week.

Harang’s 2008 splits before and after that week are remarkable. He threw 70 innings of 3.12 baseball before… and 108 innings of 5.08 ERA baseball after the “May 22, 25, 29” incident.

He appears to have found religion w/r/t pitch counts, however, based on his seemingly reasonable use of Volquez and Cueto. Either that, or he now has a GM who has told him that he’d be fired if he didn’t get with the program.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he still overused Cueto and Volquez

Cueto struggled with pitch efficiency last season, there were times when Cueto struggled to complete 5 innings and Dusty would send him out there for the 6th and his pitch count would climb up around if not above 110, when it took him 85-95 pitches just to get through 5 innings. Cueto injured his elbow and missed a couple of starts in August, and in his second start after his return in a September game against Arizona Cueto threw 115 pitches. I feel he should have been shutdown for the season given that the Reds had nothing to gain and everything to lose by running him out there.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 27, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty Baker does not understand the double switch.

I’ll leave aside the multiple times he’s actually screwed it up, for instance, causing a pitcher to bat sooner than they otherwise would have, or causing the team to bat out of order. Those were mistakes of execution, which are bad enough – but he also seemed to philosophically misunderstand the purpose of the move.

Dusty used double-switches essentially every time he removed a pitcher after the 6th inning. Regardless of the situation. Even if he only intended to use the new reliever for one inning.

A double-switch is useful because it pushes the pitcher’s spot down an inning or so, and you can use a long reliever for multiple innings without his spot coming up immediately. But it’s not free – you’re removing a starter, and presumably hurting your team offensively and/or defensively.

For instance, on April 26, 2006, Dusty brought Howry in to pitch with one out in the 8th inning and 2 men on, in a tie game.

And in a double-switch, Dusty brought Mabry in for Jacque Jones in RF. Now, Jones was a mediocre RF, but Mabry was remarkably unsuited for the position. He played the outfield like 4 times all year, usually poorly.

The pitcher’s spot was due to start the next inning, yes. But why not just use Mabry as a pinch hitter to start the bottom of the 8th? Then, you’ve used the same amount of players, you’ve gotten past the pitcher’s spot in the order, and you don’t have to deal with Mabry playing RF!

Needless to say, the first hitter Howry faced hit a bloop into RF, which Mabry lost in the sun, and which fell for a “triple”, scoring 2, and the batter later scored on a sac fly. 6-3 Marlins.

Then, to add insult to injury, Dusty replaced Howry with Eyre in the 9th inning. The double switch served absolutely no purpose.

In fact, it made things worse in every respect – the team was worse off defensively in the 8th, AND, hilariously, the pitchers’ new spot in the order (formerly filled by Jacque Jones) was now due to lead off the bottom of the 9th, so Dusty needed to do ANOTHER double switch, this time bringing Neifi Perez in to play shortstop and lead off the 9th inning.

This is the kind of BS that we Cubs fans dealt with for far too long. The Cubs employed a manager who constantly double-switched, even when it served absolutely no purpose, and actually hurt the team’s chances of winning. Because he thought it made him look like he was “strategizing.”

The net result of all those double switches was to replace a Jacque Jones at-bat with a Neifi Perez at-bat, and to replace 2 innings of Jones in RF with 2 innings of John Mabry in RF.

And to deplete the bench unnecessarily, on the off chance that the team could somehow force extras.

How can any MLB team continue to employ this joker?

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Jan 27, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+2 on the double switches

I vaguely remember the game you referenced.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jan 27, 2009 6:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention the game...

… he screwed up the double switch, wound up with a pinch-hitter being declared out, and he got ejected — I think that was his only ejection in the four years.

Here’s the game in question.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You have a good memory.

Here’s the whole story.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Incidentally...

… the comment in that article by Baker about his experience as a player with batting out of order is true.

Here’s the game where it happened. See the top of the 1st play by play.

It was, obviously, NOT the only other time, since it happened once with the Cubs, too.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 27, 2009 8:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Was this for batting out of order?

If so, then Dusty’s memory isn’t so sharp because in the article on the Reds v. Mets game where it happened he as quoted as saying the only other time was when he was a player.

by DudeVf11 on Jan 31, 2009 11:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lou isn't better than Dusty when it counts...

Look, I’m not a fan of Dusty, nor do I think he’s a good manager. But I find it amusing that there are so many Cubs fans who think Lou is so great, when in reality he has had much more talent to work with than Dusty did. And don’t forget that Dusty took the Cubs further than any manager ever did since the playoff system started. Lou hasn’t even won a playoff game with all that talent. Yes, Baker screwed up the Florida / Bartman series, but at least he got them that far. What good is 97 wins if you can’t win a playoff game? We should quit talking about Baker and instead ask why Lou didn’t have his team ready to play last year?

by rememberthecoop on Jan 27, 2009 8:18 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The only thing Dusty Baker can take credit for "taking" as Cub manager...

is a crap. He’s not a leader. His successes have been on the shoulders of superstars and veterans that can hold things together. Open your eyes and LOOK what the man produces when he doesn’t have those two things. And as for Lou and the playoffs…what the hell did you want him to do? Bench Lee and start Hoffpauir? He was simply doing what he did to win the 97 games in the regular season…the pitching rotation was all set up nice and neat for the playoffs, the bullpen had been rested, the regulars had gotten a blow for the last week. If we had gotten our asses handed to us and Lou hadn’t rested everyone like he did you would be berating the man for wearing the team out and blaming THAT on Lou too.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Jan 27, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the team was OVER-rested.

And Lou’s use of the pitching staff on the last day of the regular season was ridiculous.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 28, 2009 4:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it was over-rest.

But the attitude that the Cubs didn’t much care about the role of spoiler certainly plays into Dempster’s explanation that they were over-confident and underprepared.

But even that explanation I don’t totally buy. I think it just happened. There were opportunities missed over the course of the 161 game season and little things here and there, but I don’t see a convincing explanation for any one tragic flaw.

The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.

by DGU on Jan 28, 2009 6:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And, again, little things get magnified in the playoffs.

What if Dempster gets out of that fifth inning? He’s probably out of the game, the Cubs get out of a jam and still lead 2-0, and maybe win that game. The series is completely different if that happens.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jan 28, 2009 7:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

IT WAS LIKE THE WORST DREAM...

That October night in 2003 . Yes I also thought Baker should have been to the mound and got a fresh arm . It looked obvious that Prior had little left in the tank ……Where was the leadership in the dugout ?? Good Question …..I still wonder what if Prior had been pulled ..We will never know will we ????

by cubs north on Jan 28, 2009 12:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Request

A lot of Cubs fans, and readers here, are from places far removed from Chicago. So while you guys are able to reference stories like what happened between Mercker and Stone, etc, can somebody do a post on the end of 2004 in detail? I only vaguely know what happened; I knew Mercker called up and griped out Stoney, I knew about Stone criticizing the team overall to some extent (“just bring the ship in”), but I only have vague details.

I’d really like to know what happened with some of these stories, and in some cases it may be good to know how you got this knowledge, if anyone cares to try to tackle this. I’m relegated to only tv and the net in following the Cubs, and I’m starting to think I miss out on quite a bit not being right around Wrigleyville every day.

by JDay on Jan 28, 2009 5:59 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Basically

Some palyers were more worried about what was being said in the broadcast booth, than what they were doing on the field. The truth hurt, and some palyers took matters into their own hands.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Jan 28, 2009 7:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

what upset Mercker was

A cubs player was hit or brushed back by a pitch, and Mercker started to come out of the dugout screaming bloody hell. Steve Stone said something to the effect that Merkcer’s teamates were not behind him.

"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.

by justin007000 on Jan 28, 2009 7:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Paul Bako

Don’t forget had Bako not allowed the passed ball, there would not have been a man on second base.

Of course, I still fault Baker for sitting on his ass, chewing is damn toothpick, while Alou cried like a baby and Prior unraveled.

Check out my Cubs shrine: http://picasaweb.google.com/vegascubfan/CubsRooms#

by VegasCubFan on Jan 28, 2009 11:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball
Small
Don't Make the Mistake of Dumping Bradley

Recent FanPosts

Fukudome_bleachers_small
The Top 10 Cubs Games of 2009
66103_small
The Ordinary Wizarding Levels of Milton Bradley & the 2009 Chicago Cubs
Sandberg94home_small
An argument for Mike Cameron
P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night
Helmet_small
Az Fall League Cubs
4167bqf31ml
Five tool player available!
Self-portrait-4_small
This Might Be A Long Shot...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?
Gary Matthews Jr.

Recent FanShots

Cubs GM Jim Hendry says Milton Bradley may be back in 2010, and called the outfielder's '09 season a "major hiccup"
Bradley 3 Way-Trade????
This ought to end any MB for Wells talk...
The incongruity of our perceptions and probabilities
SC takes some BP before this past weekend's AFL RSG.
Happy Birthday, Al!
Chicago Cubs Headlines for Monday (Chicago Now)
Not a rumor, Bruce Miles speculates on a Bradley trade with good return
OT: Lidge to have surgery
OT, sexist and imho funny

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman