Interesting video regarding dead-center-field TV camera shots and how they can show strike zones more accurately than the traditional slightly-off-center CF cameras.
about 1 month ago
Al
12 comments
1 recs |
Comments
That camera does show the strike zone better from a left to right standpoint
But I don’t like how it is up and down (meaning high and low). I think it has to be set too high and you can’t always tell how high or low a ball is.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
by nji232 on Oct 12, 2009 11:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
That said… I would love to see this angle more often. It seems that we more often have questions about in and out than up and down. Plus, I think replay could use the “check swing” angle camera more often as a replay for high and low.
by fsuapollo on Oct 12, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if there is question of high or low
The dugout cameras usually give a good angle
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Oct 12, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, interesting stuff.
I think every team should at least have a dead-center-centerfield camera set up for replays. The more accurate the portrayal of a pitch, the better.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
by dat cubfan daver on Oct 12, 2009 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Oct 12, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would definitely
limit the “Where was that one?!!” exclamations that then to annoy the other people in my house when I am watching a game on TV, so I would welcome a dead center cam too.
Wrigley would seem to be a prime location for such a camera. It could be placed in one of the scoreboard panels.
"Respect" ~ Ryne Sandberg
by gwood on Oct 12, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then again...
the only teams that use it for their local broadcasts were just swept from the playoffs. Not that has anything to do with, but I’m just saying…
by CubFan81 on Oct 12, 2009 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
An umpiring conspiracy perhaps in retaliation? Quick, call Oliver Stone!
"Pain don't hurt you none" - Sparky Anderson (1987)
Obviously Sparky was never a Cubs fan...
by Zeke on Oct 13, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oliver "Steve" Stone?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Oct 13, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was great.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
by dtpollitt on Oct 12, 2009 5:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh
I (and I suspect most readers of this site) can fairly accurately call balls and strikes no matter where we’re sitting in the ballpark. The dead-center camera angle vs. offset is no different – the cameras just have better zoom features than someone in the stands.
The dead-center camera seems like a marketing gimmick. If it’s better than the offset angle, it’s not by much, and I don’t see the need for a ball club to spend the extra dollars and incur the extra liability just for this “more accurate” view. Perhaps new ballparks can incorporate this platform into their designs from the beginning, but the benefits of a retrofit are minuscule, IMHO.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
by Clutch16 on Oct 13, 2009 8:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs


















