Should we trade him, or should we not?
From now on until he gets traded ( or until Spring Training), Milton Bradley will be yet again in the spotlights here in Chicago. Most Cubs Fans want to see him gone, myself included. That has to be one of the top priorities in Jim Hendry's to do list and if he doesn't find a way to trade him, Hendry better get on his knees and pray that Bradley does well. Now this gets me asking; should we trade him, or should we not?
Why we should trade him.
For various reasons. From the moment he signed with the Cubs, he looked lost. He never fit in with the club and really looked bad with the bat. He got me convinced in Spring Training and I was drinking the MB kool-aid. Then, he started his career with the Cubs, going 0 for 18 until he got his first hit when he hit that 2-run shot in Milwaukee ( coincidantly, it came in the same game in which Kevin Gregg blew his first save as a Cub after a masterful perfromance by Rich Harden). He was mad at himself for the better half of the season, and while struggling, the media got on to him a bit and so did the Cubs fans. Why wouldn't we? He then called us racist, which made me say wow. Derek Lee was our best player this year, and after his last at bat, which was an out, every one at Wrigley gave him a standing ovation. Maybe he's color blind and think Derek is some kind of white. But to even say that is pathatic. And to backlash at us, saying we're the reason and where the place is located is the main cause why the Cubs haven't won in 101 years is mind boggling. SO HERE are the top 10 reasons why we should trade Milton Bradley.
1. Most expensive bust for the Cubs.
2. Supposed to balance the whole lineup, but how could he when he can't even balance himself?
3. You will always have to worry with him about injuries. Even if he really didn't get injured last season, he's an injury bomb just waiting to explode this season.
4. A cancer to the clubhouse, really never got along with anybody in the club house.
5. Already made enemies with every Cubs fan, and I'm sure there will be plenty of protest if he comes back.
6. 32 years old and injury prone. Are his best days behind him? Or did the ballpark in Arlington made his stats look sweeter then it actually is?
7. Showed us that some times he just wasn't in the game. This occured throughout the season, but the most significant game was the Twins game.
8. You should never have a guy on your team who is so self-centered, especially a guy who thinks it's him against the world. Time to get a player who will only think about the team, and most of the team is like that. Bradley is not.
9. He's already uncomfortable in Chicago. Why would you come here in the first place? I really think he never realized how much pressure he would get from a fanbase that supports a team that hasn't won in over a hundred years. You must get that if you play for the Cubs, and he never did.
10. He is better suited for the AL. To injury proned in the outfield, even when he runs the bases. The only clutch hit that I can remember was that 2 out single against Lidge, but then again, everbody's been clutch on that guy. A year to forget for him, maybe a Cub to forget for us. I want to see him traded. For whom, that's the problem for us.
Why we should keep him
To his credit, he rarely got hurt. Maybe that was a bad thing. He played solid defense, he was not flashy but he got the job done. Took his share of walks, and especially love takin the free base with men on scoring position. Everytime he swung, he looked like he swung above the ball, including with men on 2nd and 3rd. But then again, Rudi Jaramillo was his hitting coach when he played for the Rangers, so there is this possobility that Rudi will fix him up again. If he stays, we'll just have to wait and see. However, there is one more note I have to make. If he is willing to forget about last season and put it behind him and start anew, I'll be willing to forget and expect this season. Only if he comes back. Play for another team, and I'd be willing to expect the Bradley of '09 to any other team he plays for. I'll list five reason why he should come back instead of 10.
1. Who would we get from him? I don't want to go from one bust to another. Vernon Wells, no, Aaron Rowand, no. Just who would we get for Bradley?
2. Rudi Jaramillo might just get him back on track. He is considered the best hitting coach before the Cubs hired him. Lets just compare the Cubs offence to the Rangers offence next season.
3. You have to take chances. No questions should go unanswered. If he struggles next season, then we'll get our answer. If you do get something out of him next season, then you still trade him, since his value might increase. Maybe he helps us go all the way. You never know.
4. Maybe he actually has reflected upon himself this offseason. He might of looked in the mirror and said hey, maybe I'm the one who let everyone down. Maybe he'll get prepared and cohttp://www.sbnation.com/admin/entries/new?community_id=8&entry_type=FanPost#wysiwygme back stronger than ever. Do I beleive that, no. But that' s a chance.
5. You got to let this story play itself out. You don' t pay a guy 21 million dollars and get nothing. Again, we'll just have to wait and see. Some time or another, he'll get hot and actually win us some games. He really played solid defense and hustled every ball out. You can't question his desire. Those are good qualities for Bradley and you just have to look for the positives instead of concetrating on the negative this season. Look for the little things. If he comes back, I'll expect a better MIlton Bradley, the mature one.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments

Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we will go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
by cubnational on Nov 7, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I wouldn't be so sure...
… via @CarrieMuskat on twitter:
#cubs GM Jim Hendry says Milton Bradley may be back in 2010, and called the outfielder’s ’09 season a “major hiccup”
-about 1 hour ago from web
http://twitter.com/CarrieMuskat/statuses/5576684316
Now i know there is no context, and i know Carrie isn’t exactly Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, but…
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
True, but it could be both posturing to help
a trade and also laying the groundwork to see if he can come back.
The one scenario we havent discussed is if he can’t be traded, does Jim experiment with him back for ST and the start of the season? If he can come back and contribute without distraction, he has value and could still be traded.
The Cubs could always release him.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
The key is "without distraction".
That’s impossible. The distractions would begin on day one of spring training.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Personally, I agree, but if other GM's won't bite,
there may be real value in meeting with Bradley and his agent this offseason to lay the groundwork if trade partners don’t materialize.
Make it clear it’s a tryout and for MB to play in 2010, he better be on his best behaviour so somone will step forward to want him. If not, teams will be committed to their budgets and rosters and he could be done with a capital D.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
His history says he is incapable of doing that.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
History also said the earth was flat...
… and the sun rotated around the Earth.
Things CAN change, not matter how unlikely we believe them to be, and no matter how hard you wish they wouldn’t.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
by AndrewJStone on Nov 11, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
Ten years of Bradley's history suggest that is EXTREMELY unlikely.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
If that is so blatently obvious to you...
… how would every other GM not know the same?
And if that was the case, what is the point of the posturing?
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
by AndrewJStone on Nov 10, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
Maybe
Another 100 posts on the exact same topic will get this situation resolved sooner.
I would sleep with Blou if it meant the Cubs would win a WS. by Doggie Stalker on Aug 22, 2009 4:11 PM EDT
This is a post from a 13-year-old kid, according to his profile.
So, I’d ease up on him a little.
However, the best reason to get Bradley out of town is that it would stop the posts. Let’s hope he goes to a team that the Cubs don’t play in 2010, so we won’t have to hear about him at all.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yes, please do
It’s actually pretty well written.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Nov 8, 2009 8:58 AM CST up reply actions
Fair enough
but couldn’t there be a limit on repetitive threads? It is not as if the post is shedding new light.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Nov 8, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions
Hopefully..
… the trade will get done soon, and that’ll be the last we hear of him.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
yeah, I don't want to be mean, and it is great bit of self expression
but it is moot.
MB will be traded. He will not be back.
His antisocial behavior made sure that this is what the Cubs will be doing.
Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we will go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
No,
but more threads here on whether or not to trade MB are doing no good. There is nothing left to be said and nothing left to be gained.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Nov 9, 2009 1:41 PM CST up reply actions
So shouldn't the solution be a moratorium on Bradley posts?
…at least until he’s either gone, or Hendry publicly commits to him as the 2010 Cubs right fielder?
I guess I just don’t understand how being tired of people discussing his future with the Cubs on a blog dedicated to discussing the Cubs should be a factor here.
Chase your tail if you want
but no one is introducing anything new about the Cubs and MB, so what is the point of new posts?
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Nov 9, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions
Let the mancrush go.
That’s not true!!! WHY THE F*CK WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU AHOLE!! Ok maybe your right but you gotta give a little something here for it to work. I don’t know what I’m going to do this is the worst thing I’ve ever read, this day could not get any worse. Fine, F*ck it, you’re right.
by Ditkavsworld
wow
that was really well thought out and shows exactly why this topic is indeed controversial and unresolved. Good job. Even tho my vote is to trade him I dont want to just give him away.
Well written post
I shudder to think what I would have written at that age.
Sure, it’s been done to death, but I just wanted to give the kid kudos.
It took guts, especially with all the arsonists around here :)
Scott Bora$ is satan.
by Canadian Cubs Fan on Nov 8, 2009 10:33 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
+2
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Nov 8, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions
Hmm
Maybe I should change the age on my profile. I could be 10 again. :) Then again, I’d have to believe everything I read on the Internet. I wonder how good his Portuguese is ….
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
by WayneCampbell08 on Nov 9, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
Scandalous
http://profiles.yahoo.com/noracanary2004
She’s a tad older than 13 according to her Yahoo profile.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
by WayneCampbell08 on Nov 9, 2009 12:22 PM CST up reply actions
its probably his mother
I got stuck with my daughter’s yahoo ID on my computer and have no clue how to change it
hmm...
Well written post, and thanks for your contributions to this site and everything, but…

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.
He Voted Yes
It’s on his profile page.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
by WayneCampbell08 on Nov 9, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for your post
My big issue with Bradley is that his stock is so low there’s no way we are going to get a decent return on him this winter.
Despite the disruption it will cause (there’s no chance of things just becoming fine and dandy and MB changing his attitude overnight) I would keep him and try to move him mid-year to a contender who would possibly be more willing to take a risk with their season on the line than planning for the year ahead.
Unless Bradley completely bombs with the bat in the first half of 2010, his value will instantly go up because the Cubs won’t seem as desperate to move him having already moved on from this mess (which, despite his horrendous attitude and less-than stellar stats, is the most obvious reason for his low trade value).
But, in saying all that, those bridges look pretty well burned, and the Cubs might just have to sell with their stock at an all-time low.
I'll give him points for organizing his thoughts in a very readable way.
I also like this line:
[Milton was] supposed to balance the whole lineup, but how could he when he can’t even balance himself?
Boom goes the dynamite!
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
That line says a lot.
OK I don't know shit about basketball.
by SoulEater7 on Nov. 5, 2009 9:51 PM CST
No, it’s not my mom and I want to see more instead of getting stuck with no one.
by braziliancubsfan on Nov 9, 2009 7:43 PM CST reply actions
And sorry about the topic. I kind of knew it might have been old, but I wanted to see what you guys might think of it, besides the fact that this topic been discussed a lot.
by braziliancubsfan on Nov 9, 2009 8:05 PM CST reply actions
Jim Hendry knew he was taking a risk on Bradley, so he’s got nobody to blame for what has transpired. He is right that Milton will be in a cubs uniform because no other team wants him or is willing to pay out the remaining portion of his fat contract. Hendry could eat the remaining 20 million and give Bradley away, but that would make him look more silly than he already does and put his job on the line. His penchant for signing and overpaying underproducing players has become a cancer for the Cubs organization. Look for him to try and sign wells, figgins and cameron to complete the circus before the next season starts!

by 























