Why Are The Giants Trying To Block The A's Moving To San Jose?
Mark Purdy of the San Jose Mercury-News calls them the "Fraidy-Giants". I agree.
about 2 years ago
Al Yellon
28 comments
1 recs |
Comments
Fremont Deal Dead?
I had heard that the A’s were interested in moving to Fremont, but I wonder if that deal is dead now. How many Giants fans come from San Jose? Evidently, McGowan must think there are more Giants fans in San Jose than A’s fans. Even if that is true, does McGowan not think he could get enough A’s fans from Oakland to come across the bay to San Francisco to replace what would be the perceived lost Giants fan base in San Jose that would go over to the A’s? That must be his concern. I know Josh77 knows a lot more about the issue than I do.
"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray
The Fremont deal IS dead.
There are some Giants fans in San Jose, but it’s more than 50 miles from SF. There’s no doubt that it makes sense for all involved for the A’s to move to San Jose. The Giants are being pigheaded.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
About Same Distance as Baltimore to Washington (SF to SJ)
I don’t think the Orioles can blame their dropoff in attendance on the Nationals. That’s got everything to do with the Orioles not being any good since 1997. I know there were a lot of Orioles fans around DC. I don’t believe the Giants attendance would decline because of an A’s move to San Jose. If anything, I would think it was cause a slight increase in attendance in San Francisco with some A’s fans coming over from Oakland to see games. It’s got to be easier to get from Oakland to San Francisco than it is to get from Oakland to San Jose.
"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray
A lot of A's fans live in the South Bay near San Jose.
They’d be very happy with a move there. Otherwise the A’s are likely going to wind up in Sacramento.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
On a related note...
…Al, the A’s are expected to sign Coco Crisp pending tomorrow’s physical. Time for Hendry to speed dial Beane about Rajai Davis. Even if he does regress, and there will be some regression, he’s a spot on CF and we could use his speed.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."
I know the Cubs have asked about Rajai Davis before.
It’s very possible this will happen. I’d be fine with it.
Davis has a pretty strong reverse split — he hits LHP better than RHP.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Why are they doing this?
Because right now there are probably four Giants fans in Northern California to every A’s fan, despite Oakland’s four World Series titles to San Francisco’s zero. There are many reasons for this (tradition, TV contracts, Mays/McCovey/Clark/Bonds) but one reason is location. Baseball Fans simply don’t want to be associated with the poor, rough and mostly minority Oakland when they can be associated with hip and rich San Francisco. (This isn’t an issue in football, where Raider fans like the tough connotations of the city.) San Jose ain’t San Francisco in the "cool’ factor, but it’s a big step up from Oakland. On top of that, the south bay is where the people live nowadays, and a lot of potential Giant fans would cheer for the A’s if they were located in San Jose.
So if the A’s were in San Jose, the ratio of Giant to Athletics fans might drop all the way down to 2 to 1. Still way more than enough for the Giants to thrive. Essentially, they’re just being greedy. So yes, the Athletics should move to San Jose. Sacramento can’t support them right now—heck, they’re having trouble supporting the Kings right now and the Monarchs just folded.
Hard to believe...
… that if you’re a Giants fan you’d switch allegiances just because another team is closer. But maybe Bay Area fandom is different from Chicago fandom.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Your argument might...
…have legs when speaking of a generational transition. Currently though, I do not expect to see a large fan shift. Especially given the ease of transit between SJ & SF. Should the A’s actually move to San Jose, the East Bay (Oakland, Alameda, Berkeley, etc.) and the North Bay fans (think Napa & Sonoma) would be the real losers given the new distance of about a hundred miles for North Bay fans, and the vagaries of transit.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."
I remember some speculation that the Giants were considering a move to San Jose themselves
That may still be on their minds…
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
They were considering a move to San Jose...
… before their current park was built. That’s why they were given SJ as their “territory” by the commissioner’s office.
Now they have a state-of-the-art ballpark. They should give up a “territory” more than 50 miles away.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yes, Bay Area Fandom is different.
Big sellers in the 1989 World Series were unis/caps with half/half motif.
1/2 the cap was green with the A’s logo, half black with the SF logo.
The uni was the same.
Awful.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Dec 21, 2009 7:27 PM CST reply actions
Agreed.
For some reason the area thinks it’s perfectly acceptable to root for both for both teams. It’s almost as bad as people who say, “I root for Chicago first” and support the North & South Sides.
You gotta make a choice sometime.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."
I will admit, in 2005 I wanted the Sox over the Astros
but I live in Texas and never would have heard the end of Chicago losing. It was not saying I am a Sox fan, it was the lesser of two evils. Also I always liked Dye and have a personal reason to hate Berkman unlike anyone else on this site
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Tim!
Where the hell is my ’Dome jersey, man!
I agree, though. In ‘05 I would’ve rather had the Southsiders win, too. I even bought a cap for the series (that has now been deep sixed to the bottom of some box in my storage unit), mainly because my SO went to school with Buehrle.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."
I was given a 2005 WS Champ shirt by a former coworker and it still has the tags on it
re Dome, email me. its in my profile
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
That reminds me...
…a current big seller: green n’ gold caps emblazoned with ‘SF’ on the front. I haven’t seen much of the reverse, but they do exist.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."
The As will likely move to San Antonio or Charlotte in a few years
As cannot get a stadium deal put together in northern California. It’s just that simple. And with the state of California teetering on bankruptcy and the San Francisco Giants fighthing the As at every step the decision to leave the state is a certainty. Its just a matter of when. Either that or Bud the Dud Selig will be talking contraction once again.
The Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup in 2010.
There always Portland...
Though the economic situation isn’t great to move a team anywhere, there would be a lot of sense to moving the A’s to Portland.
Among other things it would keep them in the AL West and give the Mariners a natural rival (though of course the Mariners view PDX as their territory and would fight it like crazy).
by CubsWin!Oregon on Dec 21, 2009 11:38 PM CST up reply actions
San Jose...
is only even “Giants” territory (in terms of MLB exclusivity rights) because the team used the threat of moving there as leverage to ensure San Francisco’s assistance/permission in building of ATT Park, if I’m remembering correctly. The area itself never struck me as traditionally a natural location of Giants fans (though I of course interacted with a lot of them when I lived there.) The Giants Single-A team is down there, too.
In terms of now, I think a lot of it does have to do with the population base in South Bay as being perceived a developable market for each team. And given how big (in population) San Jose and the surrounding areas are—the CITY of San Jose itself is just under 1,000,000—we’re talking a lot of potential money. Plus, as someone mentioned, the demographic dynamics of the Bay are very much in the Giants favor. I think moving to San Jose would alter the perception of the the A’s as being connected to a grimy, depressed market to one of much more respectability (let alone what getting away from the Coliseum would do), and would therefore open up a lot of opportunities throughout Silicon Valley and up and down the CalTrain line to recruit fans to the A’s franchise.
In that sense, it makes sense why the Giants would wish to kill that, even if it’s pretty lame on their part.
I hope the A’s move there though. I really like San Jose and think it would be pretty cool if they got a nice stadium down there.
by CubsWin!Oregon on Dec 21, 2009 11:35 PM CST reply actions
In San Francisco's defense...
…they are one of the only franchises in professional sports who for all intents and purposes self-funded construction of their new stadium. Giants got very, very little public money to build the new park. And I think as part of that they believe Major League Baseball is obligated to uniquely look out for their best interests.
The As are screwed in terms of a new stadium. The state of California is near bankruptcy and beyond that there seems to be no appetite among the communities in the area (e.g., San Jose, Fremont) to help the As secure a property and development deal. So either Lew Wolff find a way to self-finance stadium construction or their alternative is to move. It would seem to me that San Antonio or Charlotte are realistic destinations…maybe even Mexico City. Portland doesn’t seem to have the political climate or baseball enthusiasm as a community to lure the As. Las Vegas might have been a logical destination at one point, but the rapid explosion of that city has been devastated by economic forces that will take many years to correct in that town.
The Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup in 2010.
It's a good point about the self-financing...
I always respected that they did that (it’s a scandal that taxpayers are forced enticed to finance stadiums for multi-hundred million dollar teams. (It’s even more aggravating when politicians and baseball owners lie and argue that cities actually recoup the money they pour in)
You could be right about your other points. I know that that criticism of Portland has been made as well. It might be right, but I sure wish (and hope) that it happens someday.
As for the A’s…they deserve better, so I hope it works out for them.
by CubsWin!Oregon on Dec 22, 2009 11:38 PM CST up reply actions
San Jose might actually do it this time
This one is right in my wheelhouse. The proposed stadium site is a mile from my office!
When the Giants threatened to move here, they would have screwed the taxpayers royally with stadium subsidies. We voted it down, about 55% against, as I recall. They went back to SF after that, and gave the city a much better deal.
This time could be very different. San Jose is battling budget deficits, like every city in California. The A’s owner knows that he can’t get a big, fat subsidy from the taxpayers due to hard times, and that previous stadium vote shows that we won’t be taken advantage of. The fact that he still wants to come here for the existing fan base leads me to believe that the deal could be reasonable. The thing that has changed since last time from the fans point of view is that the NHL Sharks history in the SJ arena (now “HP Pavilion”) shows that there is a real upside to having a well-run sports franchise move in. The part of downtown near the arena really blossomed over the past ten years — although the recent downturn has still killed some major bars and restaurants in that area.
In my opinion, the Giants got plenty out of the San Jose territorial rights, and it is time that they expired. They leveraged us into a new deal with San Francisco. They will do fine as long as they put a decent team on the field. I would rather have a National league team down here, but I will see a few more American league games if the A’s do the deal. MLB should not stand in the way.
Oh, and about Mark Purdy. He is an idiot Sox fan, putting down the Cubs when he gets an opportunity. After this article came out, I sent an e-mail to challenge him on his claim that he writes at a fifth grade level. I think that he should have to go on the show “Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader?” to prove it.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
IIRC...
… that grant of San Jose as Giants territory was made in 1989, 20 years ago, not long after the Giants went to the World Series. You’re right, it’s time that expired.
I did not know that about Mark Purdy. Did you hear back from him?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I got his standard e-mail reply
“I get 75 e-mails a day, and I do eventually read all of the serious ones.” Who knows?
I will admit that he is good-natured enough about being tweaked that he writes a “mail bag” column every now and then with a lot of letters berating him and his abilities. He always ends with a letter from a loving fan, though.
Since I have lived here for 27 years, I should revise my statement about “putting down the Cubs when he gets an opportunity”. The fact is that he has written a couple of columns over those many years, most memorably when the Sox were in the series in 2005, about his memories from when he was in college. His memories of seeing Cubs games and Sox games have led him to conclude that Sox fans are genuine, knowledgeable and working class fans, and the Cubs fans are know-nothing yuppies. I searched the Mercury News online archives, and they don’t seem to go back that far. I’ll see if I can find the offending column in my own archives, and scan and post it if I can.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
Here is an interesting legal take on this issue
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I like this
It really points out the lack of legal standing. The real issue is what the owners will vote for.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
"Territorial rights"
Basically, the giants were ready to move to St. Pete/Tampa Bay, FLA in the early 90s. A’s owners at the time, held territorial rights to san jose area, so giants can get a vote on the ballot for a possible stadium. Which never passed, never happened as we know. So with the A’s permission they gave those territorial rights to the giants, who have held it since. But now the situation is reversed and no help or compromise from the giants at all. Unlike most 2 team markets, the bay area doesnt share territories. So giants own rights to 6 counties, A’s own only 2. Now is that fair, since it basically limits the A’s of most potential sites in their area? This can be oveturned if selig and theirstadium planning commission pushes owners for a 3/4 vote. Call me skeptical since every decision during the selig era moves likes a snail.


















