Cubs Historic Photos: Seventh In A Series
There are a number of color photos in the set I got from Leo Bauby; this is the first of several I hope to post.
I'll give you the identity of the three players in this photo; it should be fairly easy, with a little digging, to figure out when it was taken. They are: Bill Bonham, Vic Harris and Billy Williams.

The players involved should have been enough to figure this out. Harris, acquired as part of the Bill Madlock deal from Texas, was supposed to be the Cubs' 2B for years to come; he was only 24, and though that .659 OPS doesn't look great from a 2009 standpoint, remember that middle infielders in that era weren't expected to hit. As it turned out, Harris really couldn't hit at all; he put up Aaron Miles-like stats in 1974 and played only five games at 2B in 1975 before being shipped to the Cardinals after that season for Mick Kelleher.
Billy Williams had started playing 1B in 1973 after his outfield mobility was reduced and played more games there than in the OF in '74. After '74 he was traded to Oakland, so it has to be a 1974 game.
With the ivy in full bloom and shirtless fans in the bleachers, it had to be a summer game. All three of these players played in only two games at Wrigley in June, July or August, 1974: a 9-4 loss to the Padres on June 18 and a 4-1 win over the Braves in the first game of a DH on July 5.
So what's this play? It appears to be an error on Bonham, but neither Bonham nor Harris made an error in either game. Williams did err in both games, but his error in the June 18 game is listed as a "catch"; the July 5 error says "ground ball". So this must be a play in the top of the fifth inning of the July 5 game, where Billy misdirected a throw to Bonham on a ground ball by Darrell Evans. It led to the only Braves run of the game (unearned). (Also giving a clue that it was the July date: it was 69 degrees on June 18, 78 degrees on July 5.)
Bonham threw a CG and improved his record to 7-11 with a 4.37 ERA. It wasn't so good for him the rest of the year. Despite having a 3.43 ERA the rest of 1974, Bonham went 4-11; he is the last Cubs pitcher to lose 20 games in a season, finishing at 11-22. The Cubs "improved" their record to 34-43 with the win; they would go 32-53 the rest of the way to finish with 96 losses, at the time second-most in team history. The 1974 Cubs finished in the middle of the NL pack in runs scored (669, sixth) but were second-worst in runs allowed (826, just four short of the Padres' 830).
Also of note in this photo: you can see clearly the large sheets of Astroturf that the Cubs used to cover the center field bleachers during most of the 1970's, and the fact that the HR basket only was in front of bleachers where people actually sat; in that era it was not in CF, nor was it past the LF or RF wells, where there were no seats at that time.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Photo
Great photo—heroes from my childhood. Bonham, along with Ray Burris, were according to Jack Brickhouse, the guys with the “lively arms” who would bring the Cubs back to respectability. Do you think the green stuff beyond center field is actually “Astroturf” or just green canvas? And why would the Cubs eventually extend the basket to that area, even though no one sat there for baseball games? Did fans sit there for Sting games?
It was definitely Astroturf.
No one sat there for Sting games. The soccer field ran from the 3B dugout to the RF bleachers — I once sat in the RF bleachers, behind one of the goals, for a Sting game.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
He actually was good, briefly.
He had a really good year in 1976 — 15-13, 3.11, threw four CG shutouts and had an ERA+ of 123. He was 24 years old, people thought he was going to be “the next Jenkins”.
He never had a year anywhere close to that — well, one, nine years later with Oakland.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
The one time that .....
I sat in the left field bleachers in my life was a game in I think was 1976-Cubs vs. Dodgers. Rick Monday hit a lead-off homerun, Dodgers get a run a little later and it’s a pitcher’s duel until the 8th….when Bill Bonham BALKS in the winning run. God what a way to lose a ballgame.
The game you are talking about might be...
… this one from August 15, 1976.
Monday did hit a leadoff HR. Bonham did balk in what turned out to be the winning run… but in the 4th inning, not the 9th.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
That was probably the one....
my college friends from Drake University who lived in the Chicago area and I had many Old Styles that day….and continued to try to consume most of the beer in Palatine that night. Thanks for the link, Al!!
Boy that ivy looks great going all the way to the top of the wall
uneven top probably made HR judgments a lot harder, though
Not really.
If the ball went behind the ivy into the unused seats, it was a HR.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Good lord, everything about this photo is depressing.
The team was horrible, Vic Harris was a bust, Billy had obviously come to the end of the Chicago line, the stupid Astroturf in the CF bleachers, and Bill Bonham. I can’t explain it but I always loathed Bill Bonham even though he was a very educated man. But I always got the feeling he thought that if this baseball lark doesn’t turn out, he could go do something else. And either Jim Marshall or Whitey Lockman was the manager. Ugh! The two most anonymous guys ever to skipper the Cubs. I don’t know how I got through the mid-70s with the Cubs!
Joe, you coulda made us proud!
by copingwiththecubs on Dec 23, 2009 6:55 PM CST reply actions
Lockman was still the manager when that game was played.
He was fired 16 days later and replaced by Marshall.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
The curtain went up in '74...
…on the last sad act of Phil Wrigley’s 45-year tenure as owner and team president. As the head of a great multinational and publicly traded consumer goods firm, he always had a lot more to lose than other old-line owners who depended on baseball for a living.
His family name was on the door and on every piece of gum his company produced. Understandably, he was risk-averse, and when owners such as Rickey, MacPhail I, and Walter O’Malley were relatively free to experiment, he held back. Any conflict between baseball and his other business interests inevitably would be resolved in favor of Wrigley Company shareholders. And yet, knowing he was unable or unwilling to compete, he stubbornly refused to sell, perhaps because of the enormous value of the free advertising on the ballpark marquee that his heirs still enjoy.
We all know his policies: no lights; foot-dragging on scouting, signing and playing minority talent; cronies-only hiring in the front office, field management, and broadcast booth; virtually no farm system before ‘46 or after ’52. With all this, it’s amazing the Cubs didn’t have more than two 100-loss seasons in that era. As Jimmie Dykes famously said in the midst of the Cubs postwar, pre-Durocher disaster: “Without Ernie Banks, the Cubs would finish in Albuquerque.”
Perhaps it was Gussie Busch’s success as head of both a successful multinational and a winning team that prompted Phil to relax his hidebound approach long enough to hire Durocher. And, whaddya’ know, with an aggressive and knowledgeable baseball man in charge, we suddenly had a winner.
But when the organization’s other built-in handicaps proved too much even for Durocher and the ’69 Cubs to overcome, Wrigley threw in the towel. By late ’73, he was 80 years old and apparently content to cut costs, play out the string, and mothball the Cubs once again, along with the Packards and Duesenbergs at his estate in Lake Geneva. Hiring Jim Marshall as manager certainly was a step in that direction, as was trading Fergie for Vic Harris and Bill Madlock.
And, speaking of Madlock, Phil Wrigley’s final insult to loyal fans, taken a few weeks before his death in ‘77, was all too typical: end a contract dispute by trading two-time reigning batting champ Madlock for a washed-up and indifferent Bobby Murcer. "There’s no ballplayer worth $200,000," Phil said, as he proceded to pay Murcer as much or more.
100-loss seasons
The irony, of course, is that both the 100-loss seasons came with Hall of Famers on the team — 1962 with Williams, Banks and Brock, and 1966 with Williams, Banks and Jenkins. (Santo would make a fourth HoFer on both those teams).
The 154-game schedule probably prevented four or five 100-loss season in the 1950’s.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
'66 was just Durocher burning away the oil slick...
…left by Wrigley and Holland. The ’62 record, however, was earned strictly on the merits, although, as you say, the team was loaded with talent enough to contend in any era. Brock had a phenomenal spring in AZ, including a 500 ft homer off Spahnie and, as he and Ken Hubbs joined an already impressive lineup, we all looked forward to a major breakthrough.
I remember Head Coach El Tappe’s quote as the team left for the season opener in Houston: “We’ve got a solid lineup,” he said, “but it’s important that we get off to a good start.” Twenty games later, at 4-16, Tappe was through masquerading as a big league manager, replaced by the equally-inept Charlie Metro.
Incredible, really, to have Banks, Williams, Santo, Brock, Hubbs, Altman, Ellsworth, Cardwell, Buhl, Hobbie, Elston and Schultz, yet still finish 59-103. Even supersalesman Brickhouse was at a loss, and spent a good part of the season muttering “This team is just snakebit.”
We can only wonder what Durocher might have done with Brock and Hubbs. Somehow, I don’t think he would have kept Hubbs batting second all year, or had Brock swinging for the fences.
Durocher would have recognized Brock's speed...
… and realized he already had several power hitters. Hubbs might have matured into a mid-range power guy; with his size he was almost a prototype of the power-hitting middle infielders of the 1980’s.
Oh, well.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Vic Harris again
I raised his name a few weeks ago at the Aaron Miles departure. Vic Harris was the worst Cubs hitter I remember but Miles was close.

by 



















