Overflow Thread 1: The Sky Is Falling (Jake Fox Traded)
Instead of taking over other subsequent front-page posts with bemoanings of how this means "fourth place here we come", here's a new thread to talk about it.
No disrespect meant to those who are upset, but he's a role player. He is not going to be the next Harmon Killebrew, Albert Pujols or even Mark DeRosa. Jake seems like a good guy and I hope he has a nice career. However, he wasn't going to be a factor on the 2010 Cubs.
To everyone who thinks that the Cubs should have gotten more - no one was beating down their door to get Fox. Hendry shouldn't be trusted with a checkbook, but he generally has made decent trades.
Quite honestly, people should be happy for both Fox and Miles - Jake is going to get a chance that he wasn't going to get with the Cubs, and Aaron needed a fresh start.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
526 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for adding this.
Really, the angst over trading Fox is overblown. He’s a decent role player who has a better role on an AL team. The Cubs got a major league middle reliever and two middling prospects.
And they got the A’s to take 63% of a contract that we thought Hendry would never be able to get rid of.
This isn’t the best deal Hendry has ever made, but it’s far from the worst.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al Yellon on Dec 4, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions 8 recs
that trading Jake Fox has generated over a 1000 posts here
shows just how desperate things are with many of the faithful. It was Jake “freekin’” Fox, for crying out loud. Get a grip people.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Dec 5, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions
+1
Numbers may not lie, but they don’t tell the whole truth (and nothing but the truth), either. -- Doug Glanville
+1
No disrespect meant to those who are upset, but he’s a role player. He is not going to be the next Harmon Killebrew, Albert Pujols or even Mark DeRosa.
Agreed.
"Some guys make lemonade out of lemons. Hendry makes hash out of prime meat."
I tend to agree on this - i.e. I'm not bullish on Fox at all
however, it should be noted that there are a number of DHs who have been really productive in short spans of time, who were relatively given away and no one expected much of them – see Travis Hafner, e.g.
Is he traded yet?
Here's an example:
David Ortiz was released by the Twinkies.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Dec 4, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
Huh?!?!
They couldn’t afford to re-sign him at the time, so they made the tough decision to let him walk. The sure as hell didn’t want to let him go, and didn’t “release” him.
You are correct about the tough decision, because they couldn't afford him.
However, he was in fact released on December 16, 2002. Check his transaction log here.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I was thinking of him
because he was only a top player for a few years before declining which is typical of a DH. Ortiz wasn’t really anything special with the Twins (as I recall) but still had potential.
However, we have learned that Ortiz did fail a drug test so I’ll always wonder what impact whatever substances he took had on his numbers.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Dec 4, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions
or if MInn knew he was using
and was not willing to keep that in their clubhouse
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I can't imagine...
Ortiz playing outfield. :)
by CubsWin!Oregon on Dec 6, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, what is up, people?
I haven’t been back to the now 600+ Fox/Miles thread, but I’d call this deal another one of Jim Hendry’s nicer “minor” trades (akin to dealing for Grabow and Gorzellany at the trade deadline). Jake Fox was a fun guy to watch swing the bat, but I’m not really sold on whether he’s ever going to be able to adequately adapt to major league breaking balls. And though he worked hard defensively whereever the Cubs put him, he’s probably never going to excel at any one position in the field.
Meanwhile, Hendry finally put the battered punching bag that is Aaron Miles out on the street for the junk collectors to take and, lo and behold, Billy Beane was behind the wheel of the rusted-out pickup truck. Maybe Miles isn’t as horrible as he appeared in 2009 – well, he almost HAS to be somewhat better. But when a aging roleplayer’s season goes that horrible awry, it’s probably best for both said player and the organization to part ways. Best wishes, Aaron, seriously. I’m sorry you had to go through what you did. Further kudos to Hendry for getting some salary relief in the deal.
Last, but not least, the Cubs have now bolstered their pitching depth a bit. I know neither of the arms picked up in the deal appears destined for Cooperstown but, c’mon, they can’t hurt.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
My favorite
part was the guy who said that Jake’s awful 2nd half was due to Lou making him a bench player…..and then going on the complain the Cubs just traded our best bench player.
He hit fine until Lou benched him for no reason.
That said, I believe he is only gone to help rid ourselves or Miles.
Fox paid the price of Hendry’s mistakes.
Good luck to Jake-I hope he hits 30 HR for the A’s.
90 PAs in the first half
151 PAs in the second half. I know he wasn’t with the club from March or anything, but he got at least equivalent playing time in the second half as he did in the first. He wasn’t benched. He’s a bench PLAYER.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
His avg took a dive after the benching. He started playing again at the end and racked up some crappy AB's.
He was cold by then.
Bet you are sad they are trying to trade your boy Bradley.
I'm fully aware of Drew's support for Bradley.
And to be honest, i was “Oh Jeezing” your backwards thinking on Fox’s numbers JUST as much as your unnecessary Bradley dig.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
I am not a Bradley apologist
Did I say there was an element of racism in how fans behaved toward him? Yes. And I sincerely believe that.
I’m in Stone’s camp regarding him (if I’m recalling Stone’s view here): I think he can be a useful tool, but I think there’s no way he can be productive in Chicago anymore. The well is poisoned thoroughly.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 4, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions
You did support him during the season quite a bit
I am glad to see you have finally come around to the fact that he should leave.
As far as the racism, a lot of players hear all kinds of crap. It isn’t right, but it happens. MB seemed to blame everything on it and the media. I am sure there was some stuff from total fools in the bleachers, but if someone tells him “You Suck” out there it does not mean it has to be racism. Bradley took every insult that way and it gets old. People not liking him because he is an ass does not make them a racist.
I am trying to remember Andre Dawson blaming racism for anything while he was playing. He is black and the fans did and still love the guy. Why is that?
and let the Cubs name their price?
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
I don't think there is "no way" he can be productive in Chicago again.
Firstly… there is that team to the south… :-)
Beyond that, i’d prefer to see him go, and soon… but not at the price of any payroll flexibility or a player we can’t / won’t use.
We already HAVE both those problems, but at least Bradley has the potential to be productive in some manner. If everything offered in the offseason is total crap, i’d prefer to keep him and see what happens in the first days of the season. Maybe he comes out of the gate raking, and doesn’t say a peep… then his trade value goes up and we ditch him before he starts in again. Maybe he whines and moans and plays poorly… then we cut him or trade him for crap, and its the same as what we’d like to do now, but at least the team TRIED to make something of it.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
Team to the south? Astros? Cardinals? I wonder who you could mean...
;-)
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
I do not want to trade Bradley. That’s got nothing to do with Jake Fox, mmm?
I hope Fox does well in Oakland. He’s certainly not the keystone to the Cubs bench. Stop making him out to be better than he really was.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions
I know you don't, I think you are 1 of 4 people in Chicago who think that way.
I am irritated because Fox would have been a nice piece of the bench. But I am happy that he will get to play now.
It was sad in limited AB’s he almost topped your boy’s stats.
I think it’s kind of funny that you’re trying to annoy me with your Bradley comments.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions
not really.
but aside from that, why? It’s got nothing to do with Jake Fox.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
Its just hard to take you seriously when you are so far in Bradley's corner.
I was talking about Bradley not Fox. Maybe you may have missed it but sometimes these threads get a little off topic…..
It's hard to take you seriously when you are so far in Fox's corner.
And bringing up Bradley just as a way to ‘prove’ somebody else wrong is silly.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
you must be joking
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions
i have no clue what he is talking about
I have not once seen a thread get off topic, anyone else seen it before?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Not without colorful graphics!
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra

I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 9:20 PM CST up reply actions
I said colorful
Not flamboyant!
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra

I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions
Or, if you're not in a holiday mood
How about a colorful Time Lord?

I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 9:34 PM CST up reply actions
OK
I’m cool with this
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
Captain Jack Harkness approves of your cool

Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
The probem Drew is Lou's use or non use of Fox in Sept.
There was absolutely NO EXCUSE for playing Scales over Fox ( as well as Fuld on occasion). Overall I don’t have a problem with the trade but I don’t think Fox was worthless by a long shot. If he had been properly used ESPECIALLY at 3rd when A-Ram went down ( The Cubs admitted it was a mistake not to get him more work at 3rd right after that if not before) he might have done some real good. There is nothing wrong with being a bench player. Fox was the guy you WANTED off the bench to pinch hit in the late innings and he was pretty impressive at that. Who is the power bat off the bench now ? Again I don’t think this was a terrible trade but I disagree that Fox was basically worthless.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
Huh?
Fox was the guy you WANTED off the bench to pinch hit in the late innings and he was pretty impressive at that
In 30 plate appearances as a PH last year he hit 208/300/292. I’m aware that it’s an incredibly small sample size, but I can’t say there was anything “impressive” about those appearances.
And obviously, the case can be made that Fox should’ve been playing over Scales. But the truth is neither one had a future on the team (Scales because of age and lack of talent, Fox because he’s a DH). Like Drew said, he got 151 at bats in the second half as a bench player, which is all he was ever going to be here. He didn’t do so hot.
No a case can NOT be made for playing Scales over Fox
Only one of those guys will be in the MLB next year. In Sept WHEN YOU ARE OUT OF THE RACE you do not play an over 30 career minor league player ON A DAILY basis for any reason except your own bizarre ways of rewarding guys you like and punishing ones you don’t. Do you actually think Scales has Fox’s power ? Who the hell do you want to give a chance to play every day to ? It is not about average with Fox it is about POWER.
As for below , Lou does not need an excuse he need to GO ( not that he will) when you play favorites so you keep Eyre over Howry, anything over Wuertz, Scales over Fox and spend an entire season mismanaging your bullpen you should explain yourself. I will never forget Lou after he put in Howry the last weekend of 08 against the Mets to blow a 3 run lead in the 8th with one of his gopher balls explain that the reason Howry would be OK for the post season was that he had sat down and had a talk with him . Nice talk but Eyre got the ring. Basically you have a string of players ( DeRosa, Eyre, Wuertz, Fox etc) all saying Lou did not communicate with them. This is not good.
This is not about the Fox trade but about how Lou continues to play favorites and often force trades to the detriment of the team. I am not letting Hendry off the hook, he hired him and he is letting him dictate too much of the roster.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
How do we know Lou is forcing trades?
On every team there are guys who play very little, and pitchers who pitch very little too.
And Eyre? His WHIP Lou’s first year was 1.796, and then 1.676 in the time he spent with the cubs in 2008. That’s why Lou didn’t like him.
But Howry was so good he used him day after day ?
I am upset about Eyre, Wuertz, DeRosa even Wood because all have more or less said Lou did not communicate with them and an inability to communicate with players is a bad thing. It is not like Lou has been a genius at the managing strategy.
Of course there are guys who are used very little but the point is to know when to use them and to make them feel they are an important part of the team because they are. Bench guys and the 12th pitcher on the staff are often the keys to a team but like Lou’s ill fated to drive to Cincinnati Lou does not know how to use those keys properly. As with the last two seasons ( yes ever since my epiphany in Philly when Lou ran out of players in a 9 inning tie game) I hope that the Cubs can win despite him because they can not win because of him.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 2:55 AM CST up reply actions
Howry's WHIP in 2007 was 1.168
You and I are in agreement regarding Lou’s use of Howry in 2008. He was pretty damn awful (although his 08 WHIP was still better than Eyre’s 07 WHIP), and Lou should’ve stopped using him. Fail on his part. But you keep thinking that Eyre and Howry are inextricably linked, when in fact, they’re not. Howry showed Lou that he could pitch in 07. Eyre never did.
The reason I obsess on Eyre
Is that he gets dumped by the Cubs after having pitched terribly with an ERA over 7 but picked up by the Phillies where he pitches with an an ERA well under 2 for the rest of the season and the one after that. Clearly he had the talent to pitch but something in Chicago was not working and I think a manager that does not speak to you ( which is what Eyre said) does not help. For whatever reason Howry sucking was OK to Lou ( apparently because of giving up walks, he gave up home runs) and he could just talk to him after the Mets game and tell him to pitch better , but Eyre was frozen out. It is part of pattern going back years that Lou does not understand or deal well with pitchers in particular. When you have a reliable bullpen it gets glossed over, when you actually have to use pitchers carefully and stroke a few egos, Lou screws it up.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions
Have you confirmed from another source that Lou did not speak to Eyre?
Otherwise, whaddya expect Eyre to say? Think he’s going to say that it was all his own fault he sucked while he was in Chicago?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Eyre was not runing around bashing Lou
He just said rather wistfully that he wished Lou had talked to him. DeRosa and Wood more or less indicated the same. Not that Lou never spoke to them but that they did not really communicate with them. I go also go back to Derek Lowe’s comment from his rookie season when Lou had him shipped to Boston because he walked to many guys. He said Lou still thought like a hitter and did not trust or understand pitchers. So the Mariners shipped out one of the more consistent pitchers of the decade because Lou couldn’t trust a rookie who walked to many guys.
Another interesting bit involved Wuertz who also indicated Lou did not really communicate with him. In another blog someone reported going to a Sox game and shouting out to Wuertz who was practing before the game. He asked how he liked being on Oakland Vs the Cubs and he said " they let me play". When you have a whole lot of ex players pretty much saying the same thing, that Lou did not communicate with them, it is a pattern. Part of being a manager is to deal with players fairly and to sometimes give them a boost when they are in a slump. I don’t think he does either and both of these.
For the record I was fine with Lou the first season. Like everyone else I thought great we just got the most experienced winning manager in baseball but that weekend in Philly in April of 08 opened my eyes. I got a LOT of grief last year for saying he was a bad manager, this year not so much.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
just like former employees in the real world
former players will look for a reason to blame the current management at the former job.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
None of these guys attacked Lou
They were almost wistful and sad. They were not bashing him. DeRosa and Eyre in particular seemed almost confused as to why Lou did not speak to them. Lou is a guy who can’t even be bothered to remember a players name and I don’t think age has anything to do with that. I remember Terry Francona saying that his father Tito who was an MLB player told him the one thing he had to do as a manager is be straight with players and always deal with them directly. Francona does not strike me as great strategic manager but he is a guy who can keep a club house of egos working together and he has two WS in the last 5 years.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions
the "why didnt he talk to me more"
is a bs excuse. Its just like saying “why didnt management tell me before they laid me off”
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
But he did speak to them
He just, apparently, didn’t “communicate” with them. But this is all hearsay, and things you claim players “more or less” said. These people are professionals. DeRosa had his best years as a Chicago Cub. Apparently Lou’s lack of “communication” didn’t have a negative effect then.
Of course he spoke to them
It would be pretty ridiculous if you did not even speak to your players but you don’t find it odd that a parade of players who leave the club all say some variation of " I have no idea what Lou wanted because he never really talked to me". Again none of them said this in anger, more like sorrow.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions
Actually what I find odd is your obsession with Lou
Maddux, I understand. I mean, it’s a little bit out there, but hey – I stand out on a street for hours at a time hoping to catch a baseball, so I understand good obsessions. If it makes you happy, it’s time well spent.
But this negative obsession with Lou is just off the charts. Don’t you find it odd how much time you spend researching, remembering, reciting, and rehashing every little perceived mistake Lou ever did? Don’t you think life is too short to obsess on this? I mean, a person has only so much spleen to vent in a lifetime – you’re gonna waste all yours on Lou?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
It may seem like that
but I spend almost no time “researching” Lou. I stumbled on the Lowe quote last year , all the rest comes from watching the games and reading standard news stories. You can ask Al ( or my poor friend Linda who was next to me at the Phillies game) how often I go ballastic DURING the games whan Lou played Scales or put in Marmol with huge leads or Howry at all. I obsess because it is so frustrating to see the train wreck coming after these moves and not being able to do anything BUT bitch. I try to convince myself the Cubs have enough talent to survive Lou’s managing but it ain’t easy. I know the defination of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result which covers both Lou’s managing and my complaining about it. He will keep playing favorite, overusing the bench and bullpen etc and I will keep complaining about it.
Now Maddux I get google alerts on and Fuld I check on every two weeks or so but Lou I never bother with.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 11:00 PM CST up reply actions
Fuld I check on every two weeks or so\
By the way, Fuld’s wife called, and she wanted me to remind you that the restraining order is for fifty YARDS, not fifty feet. Also, she wants you to stop ringing the doorbell and running away. :P :P :P
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 11:18 PM CST up reply actions
I was only checking out the lovely fall folliage in NH
I had NO idea Fuld lived there.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions
I've never played professional baseball
But I assume the hitters were supposed to get hits, and the pitchers were supposed to get outs. When they didn’t and never showed him they could (Eyre), Lou became upset. If they weren’t aware that that was their job, well, I guess Lou did fail them then.
Look, I understand your complaints about Howry. I get the Scales over Fox thing too. But you really do seem obsessed with trying to come up with reasons for hating the guy. Your arguments against him are based on hearsay or isolated incidents, but you’ll continue to trot them out regardless.
None of this will change your mind, so I’ll just end by saying I’m sure we both hope this years team is able to win “in spite of that horrible, uncommunicative, hate filled, cleared the bench that one time, Lou Piniella”.
I do not hate him
Like any Cub fan I wanted him to succeed. The issues with players are important to me because I think they reflect how he manages but what really, honestly drives me NUTS is how he manages DURING the game (including the roster). You can ask Al or Kasey who sit near me for certain games, I think I just about lost it the time he left Marmol in to blow a five run lead the day before the all star break in 08 etc. Lou Piniella has a style that worked 15-20 years ago with different teams, but it doesn’t now. I know Lou knows more about baseball in his pinky finger as they say then I do in my lifetime but so does every other profesional in the game but I honestly believe his time has past and his attitude this summer in particular seemed to show that.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions
"...go back to Derek Lowe’s comment from his rookie season..."
you’re using something a rookie said from 1997 to bolster your argument about Lou’s managing ability now?
Wow – you’ve really outdone yourself on this one. Very impressive.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
i respect doggie
but ’seems willing to do anything to paint a bad picture of Lou
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 5, 2009 4:55 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I did not start out that way
game after game of watching him mismanage does make you crazy.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions
It is easy to paint a bad picture of Lou as a manager
He gives me way too much to work with.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 9:56 PM CST up reply actions
Rec'd
I feel the same way.
Very soon after I started following this blog regularly, I made arrangements to meet her and Al at my yearly visit to Wrigley field. They both seemed really nice, with lots of helpful advice. I did not meet up with them due to the confusion of a rain delay, but hope to in the future.
In reading her posts over the two years that I have been here, however, I do find the constant Lou-bashing pretty tiresome. I don’t know how many times I have heard about that game where Lou used up all of his players in a 9-inning game. I don’t find it to be the damning indictment that she does. I contrast this certainty that Lou sucks with her many admissions that “I don’t know that much about…”. I just don’t find her to be a credible witness that Lou should be ridden out of town on a rail. One of my favorite, well-reasoned and well-informed contributors here, DGU, says stuff like “I assume that Lou knew more than I did about what was going on…”. The day that I see Doggie Stalker post something like that, I will fall over dead from shock.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
I have known Jessica for more than 10 years.
She is a good friend and as knowledgeable about baseball and the Cubs as anyone on this site.
I, too, shake my head at times at Lou’s bullpen use, on his doghouse, on his bizarre lineup selections. But Jessica’s Lou-bashing is over-the-top, and using that one Philly game as “the prime example” is too much for me.
Lou Piniella is neither the best nor worst Cubs manager in my lifetime. But I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt after two consecutive playoff appearances.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Thanks for the response, Al
Who do you think is the best Cubs manager in your lifetime? I don’t see a lot of candidates for the best.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
No, I don't either.
I’d say Durocher, but his tenure ended in disaster. Jim Frey? He won a division title, but the rest of his tenure was mediocre.
You’re right, there are few candidates.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
1985 wasn't really his fault, though
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 7, 2009 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
you are behind the times Ballhawk
Been using that one for over a year , right next the Phillies game where he used the whole bench in 9 inning of a tie road game.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 5:05 PM CST up reply actions
Okay, have it your way...
You’re using something a rookie said in 1997 to bolster your argument that Lou was a bad manager in 2008.
That’s only 11 years old instead of 12. Yep, that’s much better.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
She's never going to let that game in Philly in April '08 go, either...
… even though the Cubs won the game, and even though they won 97 games that year.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yep they won on an error in the 10th
after Z was the only one left to pinch hit. The point is no remotely good manager uses ALL HIS POSTITION PLAYERS in a 9 innings in a road game. It opened my eyes as it were and I started to notice how Lou DID absurdly overuse the bench and the bullpen , managing for that moment only with no attention to what he might need later in the game. Yep 97 wins and and an 0-3 in the post season. Lou has had the roster to work with and it has covered a lot of his bad moves but this year it became more apparent the emperor had no clothes and no clue ( “what do you want me to do ?”). I realize a lot of you are reacting to my obsessive rants on Lou but honestly do you believe he should have played Scales in Sept ? Used Howry and Gregg as long as he did ? Bring in Marmol with 4 plus run leads ? By themselves each game is islolated but together there is a pattern. Al a certain mutual friend of ours who knows more about baseball than the entire BCB put together ( No NOT Deep Goat) seemed just about as frustrated with Lou as me ( though equally angry at certain players) is he wrong too ?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions
No, but...
…. he seems less obsessed with this than you are.
For me, Lou did a pretty good job in 2007 and 2008, less so last year when he seemed uninterested at times. I’m not going to single out one game and harp on it for two years as “evidence” that Lou is a “bad” manager.
I don’t particularly care for his use of the bullpen and his lineup selections are occasionally bizarre, though not nearly as bad as Mr. Clog The Bases who preceded him.
The bottom line is, that any manager who’s with a team long enough is going to get bashed by that team’s fans. You should see what some Cardinals fans say about TLR — and he’s brought them to the playoffs 8 times in his 14 years there, to the WS twice, and won it once.
We’d have taken that over the last 14 years.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al Yellon on Dec 6, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes I overuse the Phillies game
but mostly because it was where I saw the light as it where. It was after that game that I started paying closer attention to his actual moves. I don’t think he is that much better than Mr. Clog the bases but he definately has had better rosters and less major injuries to work with. You have sat next to me Al and seen me go crazy this year in particular with his moves. It really is NOT personal , it is an obsession because it is like watching a train wreck you can’t stop ( I actually left Shea in 08 when he put Howry in and the Cubs had the LEAD because I KNEW what was going to happen).
Bottom line if all the players work out more or less perfectly Lou will sit back and leave them alone and the Cubs can win, but if too much strategic managing is needed during a game things go bad so here is hoping Lou does not have much to decide during games in 2010.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 10:05 AM CST up reply actions
Rec'd
Al, I am glad to see that you are trying an intervention here. I have started to notice more what “good” managers do, in playoff games to boot, and they all seem ripe targets for second-guessing.
See my recent comment above. I do still hope to meet you and Doggie Stalker at a game sometime, but not really if there is going to be ranting about every move Lou makes.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
He may be letting him dictate portions of the roster
but very minimal peices. Keep in mind you are talking about Eyre, Fox and Wuertz. Eyre does have a ring, but the Phillies would have won with or without him. I wish Fox the best, but I don’t see things working out for him unfortunately. I am with you on Wuertz, but only because he is a MN boy like myself.
Lou doesn't need an excuse for playing one guy over another
he’s the manager. He gets to decide.
Fox had his moments. He had his shot with the Cubs. It wasn’t enough. If he does well in Oakland, I’ll be happy for him. I’m not worried about the Cubs bench.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
The post that you are responding to
Does not say that Fox is basically worthless. And I think that it is quite a stretch to believe that if Lou played Fox 10 or 20 more times, he would be worth more.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
Many people here do think Fox is worthless
My point is we had less of an ability to access his value because Lou played a career minor leaguer over a player we needed to see play more. The trade only reminds us of how poorly Fox was used. I don’t see how anyone can
justify Lou’s playing of Scales over Fox . I of course see this as a part of his pattern of misusing players, playing favorites, and just being an overall poor manager of players.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 11:13 PM CST up reply actions
I disagree
Fox was gone this offseason, it was almost a given. The Cubs were trying to move him before the deadline IIRC and Lou knew playing him could hurt his trade value. Scales is an older player who had better defensive skills, and less powerful a bat, no one will argue that, but during the last few weeks of the season, Scales was trying out for a ST invite and a bench role for 2010, Fox was not.
Fox is 27, he too has been a career minor leaguer. He is not exactly a 21 year old kid, he is a “vet” in age and the door is closing on him as well.
Regarding “evaluating” the two, Fox did see action in 82 games and had more AB’s than Scales, and when looking at the two against each other, neither jumps out as impressive.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
oh now I get it.
Hendry told Lou that Fox was going to be traded so don’t play him. Yes that works for me. Oh and by all means while you are at it play the career minor league player on a daily basis while other younger players like Fuld & Colvin are on the bench. Fox will by playing in the MLB next year and Scales will not be. Scales has NO chance of a bench spot. He is Iowa filler. Of course unlike Fox he was just grateful to be getting MLB pay and was not annoying folks about wanting to play like that annoying Fox.
Again whatever you think of Fox, there was no good reason to play Scales on a daily basis in Sept when the Cubs were OUT OF THE RACE. This is baseball 101 but something Lou flunked. Far more important to show he is in charge than use players who you need to evaluate.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 12:54 AM CST up reply actions
why play a DH who cannot field well
when you can play someone who can catch the ball, has speed on the bases, and is not much worse with the bat?
I agree about Colvin and Fuld, etc but Fox vs. SCales is silly, both are “old” in baseball terms for a rookie. Fox was a man without a home on the Cubs, that was not a hidden fact.
I am not saying that Scales has a spot but he has a better chance with the Cubs than Fox did.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
That is just silly
A guy who will never be more than one week call up roster filler has a better shot than a guy who has some serious power and has been steadily improving his defense ? I think that is dead wrong but even if you believe THAT , there is still zero justification for playing Scales on a daily basis. It was basically Lou saying F- You to a whole bunch of young & actual bench players that are supposed to get a chance to play in Sept
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
truth is neither should play in the field daily
and Scales is a better glove, Fox has more power, both were not good over all at the plate
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
actually, I'm pretty sure he was looking up towards your seats when he said F- You
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
No if he was looking toward my seats
He was giving Kasey the thumbs up.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:40 PM CST up reply actions
Add me to the list
… of those who haven’t been able to wade through the extensive Miles/Fox post.
My two cents worth, this was neither a good nor a bad trade, it was what it was. Is it possible that Fox will turn out to be a solid DH for the A’s, but its also possible that the three bodies the Cubs landed will provide some value. I think its much more likely that Fox continues to have the struggles that landed him in Piniella’s dog house and that the Cubs landed a few 4A players.
IMO the story of this trade isn’t the trade, it was why this trade was necessary. This should serve as yet again another reminder that Jim Hendry needs to improve how he does his job. Trading Miles was necessitated by a.) Hendry giving Miles too much money for too many years and b.) Hendry digging a massive hole with some of the contracts that he has handed out. Fox could have been a part of a bigger trade and may have netted the Cubs a better prospect, however Hendry has cornered himself in to such an extent that every million dollars is important. There is no room for waste with some of the massive contracts to untradable players and unfortunately the only way Hendry was able to free up this money was by giving up on Fox. Without the need to free up that money Fox likely could have gotten something better.
More likely than not we’ll see Miles have a bounce back (yet still mediocre) season. Fox will be what Corey Patterson, Ronny Cedeno and Felix Pie were… exciting to the new team and likely to have some standout games, but in the long run a disappointment. We can only hope that Gary Hughes and co saw something they really liked and got something under the radar. Finally, we’ve got to hope that Hendry stops giving away stupid contracts and learns how to be a GM who does more than sign free agents.
You're way too harsh on Felix Pie.
He had a good year offensively in 2009 (and a phenomenal second half), he’s salary-controlled, 25, awesome on the basepaths and with the glove in CF…. Hendry trading him for no reason is one of his worst moments.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 4, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
this
I agree with.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 2:09 PM CST up reply actions
Has the season started yet?
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Are we still upset over trading Fox?
I won’t even bother going into the other thread.
Lou didn’t like Fox, Fox barely played the last few weeks of September. In 2010 he wouldn’t have been the primary backup at third (that would be Jeff Baker) left or right (Sam Fuld) and probably not even first (Hoffpauir, Baker again).
Please have all the success in the world in Oakland Jake, but let’s not get stupid here. Fox simply wasn’t going to do much here.
Officially Aaron Free since 12/3/2009. Good work Hendry.
You've hit the nail on the head.
Even in his off-season meeting with Jim Hendry to discuss his future with the Cubs, Hendry could not tell Fox where he should focus defensively in winter ball. In the Cubs organization, he truly was a “Man Without a Position,” and that wasn’t going to change. The fact that he was the bait that helped get Aaron Miles sent out of town is icing on the cake.
As much fun as it was for me personally to watch an old high school teammate play for my favorite baseball team, I’m glad to see Jake have an opportunity to be an everyday Major League player.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
Thanks for the dose of sanity
The fact that Aaron Miles is no longer a Cub is going to make my first beer tomorrow taste that much better.
While I appreciate how Jake helped us out the best he could last year, he is an AL player. And if we had to part with him in order to say goodbye to Miles, fine by me. And any “prospects” we received in return, in my mind, are all just gravy.
To the people that are worried that now any potential deal for Granderson is out the window ~ if that deal hinged on whether or not Jake Fox was a part of it, I’ll get a tattoo of Aaron Miles on my upper-right shoulder blade. Like someone mentioned earlier in the mega-thread, Detroit is supposedly stocked with DH type players in their system, just the same as nearly every other team in baseball is. Good luck in Oakland, Jake!
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." ~Alvin Dark
by DamonBerryhillsMitt on Dec 4, 2009 12:00 PM CST reply actions 4 recs
Rec'd. The Jake Foxes of the world are NOT. THAT. VALUABLE.
The Detroit DH issue isn’t the only place this is a problem… there are scores of dudes out there who can still hit but can’t field for their lives. Because supply for them is high, demand is low. Because demand is low, expecting to get much back is asinine.
We should be happy to be rid of miles, and Fox won’t be missed in any tangible ways. If he is, there are plenty of other dudes available who can do what he did.
And you are correct… those prospects, whoever they are, are just gravy.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
I don't know if the trade was good, bad or ugly
However I find it very interesting how passioned the reaction here has been.
I bet a field sociologist would feel as happy as pig In a mud hole, researching us.
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
by eths on Dec 4, 2009 12:04 PM CST via mobile reply actions
LOTS OF FRUSTRATION,
…and too much information. Pundits, “professional” and home-grown, telling us what we should be thinking.
It’s complicated being a Cub fan in the new millennium, isn’t it?
Numbers may not lie, but they don’t tell the whole truth (and nothing but the truth), either. -- Doug Glanville
And this is just over a couple of guys that were "meh" to hated.
Very excited for the day the big bird leaves the nest.
(That’s code for you know who…)

Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
Yeah, just imagine how many comments we'll get when [name redacted] is traded.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
You might want to tell SBN to reserve some extra server space now.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
I'll get right on that!
Maybe I should make a post AND an overflow at the same time.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al Yellon on Dec 4, 2009 2:44 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You could change the blog name to Bleed Bradley Blue for a few days...
…and put his picture up in the logo space.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Hmm... now I'm in the mood to watch "The Serpent and the Rainbow"
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Al should make a post and also schedule a timed overflow
just like he does with the games threads when our favorite board game is traded.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Dec 4, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions
BREAKING NEWS: Baseball trade crashes the internet... Reality reboot necessary...
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
-100 for posting pornography
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
I can only hope and pray that sometime in the spring Hendry
fesses up that he couldn’t land Granderson because the Tigers wanted Jake Fox in return – just to see the tattoo pledge come true – and don’t worry, I’m sure the chicks will really dig it!!
p.s. Jake Fox will eventually go to Japan and become the next Tuffy Rhodes
by doofus cubs guy on Dec 4, 2009 12:09 PM CST reply actions
You don't hafta tell me
The Aaron Heilman one on my left shoulder has worked wonders for me when it comes to the ladies.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." ~Alvin Dark
by DamonBerryhillsMitt on Dec 4, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
The A's are hoping Fox can be a little bit better than say a Jack Cust.....
….and simply Fox doesnt fit here or in the NL. You cant get the A’s or anyone else for that matter to take your garbage (nothing personal Aaron) without some sort of upside.
I think there is an fan attraction to players that appear to be hard workers (trying many postions), overcome some sort of adversity (long time in minors) and are charismatic and Fox seems to fill all of those qualities.
Jack Cust is Jake Fox's ceiling
Thats the best I can possibly ever see him doing, and thats after 6 pack of red stripe
Well, except Fox...
… will never, ever draw close to 100 walks a year, as Cust has done twice (and 93 in another year). Fox just doesn’t have the plate discipline.
Fox is a poor man’s Craig Wilson. Except he’s already the same age that Wilson was when he had his one good year (2004).
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I really enjoyed the first thread.
Responding to the trade’s critics/Jake Fox’s diehards gave me a nice laugh and a half.
I do think we were all in agreement in our happiness about Miles leaving.
It won’t be the same when Bradley goes. There are still some fools on here who want him to stay.
Twice in one thread?
Come on. I don’t think anybody around here is jumping up and down proclaiming how MB MUST be around next season.
We really just want something fair in return as far as value. Giving up MB for some horrible contract that will handcuff the team or for some rotting corpse of a guy who won’t help the Cubs win a world series makes no sense.
Those are two totally separate arguments, and ignoring the gray area between doesn’t help you make your case.
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
He is a cancer and needs to go for anything
Almost anyone we get back will be easier to trade if needed. That Jim didn’t see this coming when most of the rest of the world did should cost him his job.
Ode to Joe- bye bye Miles
I was overjoyed last night when I saw that we finally traded away Miles. So happy that I scared my 6 month old a little as I was whooping it up upon seeing the posting. Thats actually two players from ‘09 that everybody hated to come onto the field (Hileman the other) that we don’t have to worry about in 2010.
Yeah Fox was a fun player to watch, but as everyone has said he didn’t have any real place on this team. Lets just hope this is the start of some more moves and trades.
Eagerly awaiting the post of Bradley being traded and curious to see how many people will actually boo-hoo it, lol. Happy Winter Meeting everyone
by NebraskaCubsFan on Dec 4, 2009 12:51 PM CST reply actions
I think this is a great move
It gets Aaron Miles out of town and puts Jake Fox into a position to succeed as a DH and get 3-4 AB’s per game that he would have NEVER gotten in Chicago. His defense just wasn’t on-par with a position player. I wish Jake all the best, and just hope there isn’t any Eric Patterson/Matt Murton hate left in Oakland from the Harden/Gaudin trade… although I think both sides have been thoroughly shafted by now. And hopefully Aaron is out of the league quickly so he and the A’s don’t have to suffer any further humiliation.
This is a great move
everybody wanted Miles gone since about April 16 of last year and he is gone now. You people killing this trade should learn something from the stock market. When you make a bad investment and finally realize it and can get out of it, you cut your losses and move on. Worst case this move saved us 1.7 mil to use at the trade deadline this year. This deal tells me we might only have to eat 5-6 million of the Bradley deal which is good and it might even be better than that. Bradley is a far better player than Miles.
by Cubsfan Waveland on Dec 4, 2009 1:10 PM CST reply actions
that's far from the worst case.
Worst case is that the Cubs are trotting the equivalent of Neifi Perez and Jose Macias out as the first bat off the bench in crucial situations, because Hendry was trying to save $1.7M that he’d foolishly spent 9 months earlier.
I refuse to believe that this move is “setting up something big” until I see it. Hendry has burned us too many times.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 4, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
There are plenty of players that can play first on a limited basis.
I never said it was setting something big up but 2 mil flexibility at the trade deadline can allow us to do things we couldn’t this year. Fox had his highest value as trade bait right now. Fox turning even into a Ryan Ludwick would be a stretch, Fox is 27 almost 28.
by Cubsfan Waveland on Dec 4, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
I think the people who are really upset
… are the ones who stopped watching the Cubs late in the year when it was clear the postseason wasn’t happening for the team. If Fox had hit like he did in June for the rest of the season, I can understand the angst.
It’s my guess that the Cubs limited Fox’s playing time when they realized other teams determined how to get him out. I got flamed for saying that in September, but is there any other reason Lou would have played Scales over Fox?
We don't know. Nobody in the media asked that pretty obvious question.
I guess we will never know why there were games when Lee, ARam, Sori, and Bradley were all out and Fox STILL didn’t play. I wish Lou would quit. He managed like he wanted to get fired late in the season. That way he could go home and still get paid.
by TJ11 on Dec 4, 2009 2:02 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The Cubs should have a good team in an even weaker division
If they start of poorly, you may get your wish. There’s really no reason for the Cubs to not be division favorites next year unless the Cards pull a Yankees and sign all the good ’uns.
Are you familiar with the old robot saying, "Does not compute"?
by dr stabbingworth on Dec 4, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions
Probably all year.
Lou’s gone anyway — Hendry probably has till the end of the 2010 season. Presuming the Cubs get back to the playoffs, Hendry probably saves his job.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Totally agree
I was at a game this year when the Cubs were only 5 games behind the Cardinals in early September. The scoreboard showed that the Cardinals had lost, but Lou sent out a line-up (against the Pirates) made up of almost all subs (Scales, Blanco, etc). It wasn’t a line-up that a team makes who is trying to catch a first place team.
The score was tied in the middle of the game, when he decided to put in David Patton, who hadn’t pitched in months. He then left Patton in long enough to give up 4 runs. He had made a huge mess without getting anyone out before Rothschild even got up to talk to him. The Cubs seemed to give up after that, and steadily dropped in the standings throughout the next month as the same people continued to play every day. There never seemed to be an urgency to win.
I think that was the white flag waiving right there, with a month left in the season. And there was NO excuse for it. Sandberg needs to be the manager now if the Cubs really want to change the current mentality.
Sandberg needs to be the manager now if the Cubs really want to change the current mentality.
Because Sandberg has… two seasons of managing? And how many does Lou have? How many rings?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 8:50 PM CST up reply actions
and Lou got his last ring when ?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 9:09 PM CST up reply actions
last night
HE WENT TO JAREDS
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
What have you done for me lately
Lou Pinella?
Don’t try to pretend any more, I can tell that you find him fascinating.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
The game has past Lou by. He managed like shit last season.
How many times does Lou need to say after a game “What do you want me to do?” For you to see that he has no answers.
He gets paid 4 million a year to get some.
Do you think he did a good job last year?
Last year as in 2009? It wasn’t a great year. But the manager doesn’t play for the players, either. The responsibility for the 2009 season falls on all of the members of the team and management.
But he took this team to two post seasons two years in a row. Who is the last manager to do that?
Go find out. I’ll wait.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 11:20 PM CST up reply actions
Frank Chance
Lou looked lost and the players feed off their manager’s energy. Of which lou had none. He looked like a tired old man who wanted to go home.
and when
did Frank Chance do that? I’ll wait some more.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions
a few years ago
I remember it like it was yesterday
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
sure,
for you, old man… :P
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions
so, what you're saying
is that Lou Piniella did something with the Cubs that hadn’t happened for 100 years?
and yet, because he didn’t play Jake freakin’ FOX, he’s a bad manager?
The 2009 season sucked. No one’s denying that. But it didn’t suck because Jake Fox didn’t get to play as much as you wanted. And if 2010 sucks, it won’t be because Jake Fox was traded to the As.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 3:41 PM CST up reply actions
Its pretty obvious the season sucked because hendry trade saint derosa
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions
and 2010 is over now
since we traded Fox
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
The only way this can be fixed
is by trading bradley for FELIX PIE
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions
There were more reasons than Jake Fox not playing
Jim Hendry had more to do with the Cubs sucking than anyone. The Fox thing is just a good summary of the Cubs thinking. I won’t go through the examples because you didn’t like him anyways.
If this team was run by a good organization it should have won the division. Even with the injuries.
I think you’re making several assumptions that cannot be supported.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
like the fact
that the GM doesn’t even put on a uniform, much less play in the games — therefore assuming that the GM is so central to the day to day playing that decisions he makes in the offseason can directly link to individual losses.
I don’t care what team you are. When you lose Aramis Ramirez for 50+ games, you’re going to have issues.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 4:14 PM CST up reply actions
Even with the injuries.
Are you stupid?
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions
How long was ARod out?
The Yankees lost their 3B and won a MUCH harder division. Matsui was out, Posada missed time.
They are just a better run team.
How long would Miles have been on that roster?
How stupid are you?
I dont know how many teams manage to contend when
2 of their major run producers are injured for a good portion of the season, another is hit with a nagging injury for the entire season, almost every member of the starting rotation ends up on the DL, the CFers main platoon partner lands on the DL twice, the starting catcher lands on the DL and probably a bunch of other injuries i cant even remember
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 6, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
The Yankees had quite a bit of that
Also the have Girardi who should have been hired instead of Lou. Another mistake by Hendry.
Also the have Girardi who should have been hired instead of Lou. Another mistake by Hendry.
oh please, a monkey can be successful managing the yankees
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 6, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
Joes first two years in NY
many were saying the opposite, since he was faikling in NY and close to losing his job there while Lou was taking us to the playoffs
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Actually, he's only been their manager 2 years
Joe Torre was in 2007
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 7, 2009 8:34 AM CST up reply actions
I think the answer to that question
is self-evident, isn’t it, jc?
The Cubs certainly aren’t the first team in the world to underachieve.
If all the so-called “experts” agreed that Hendry screwed up the team, why did almost all of them pick the Cubs to win the division last season?
That’s one thing I never see the “It’s all Hendry’s fault” camp ever, ever address.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
I'll address the "expert" point
I think most felt that the Cubs were the best team in a weak division going in to the 2009 season.
I’m not a fan of Hendry, but he’s better than Frey or Himes were.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 7, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions
How would you compare Hendry
to Dallas Green, SB?
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 7, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions
I know you didn't ask me, but
“Girth” seems the right answer here.
at daver's request, Let's frontload this B**ch!
Green
Best GM the Cubs have had since I’ve followed the team in the early 1980’s.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 7, 2009 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with both
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
I'd put Hendry #3
Candidates since Green:
Frey
Himes
Lynch
MacPhail
Hendry
MacPhail gets a lot of deserved criticism on his tenure as president, but he turned around the mess that was 2002 in a hurry as GM.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 8, 2009 6:57 AM CST up reply actions
You are right. That should have said:
That MacPhail cleaned up the mess of 2000 in a hurry.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 8, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
Fox was only an example of Lou's bad managing
Obviously playing Scales over Fox, Fuld & Colvin in Sept had ZERO impact on the standings but it is indicative of Lou wanting to show who is the boss and play favorites over what is good for the team. Girardi is kick ass kind of guy too but he does it fairly and thinks AHEAD during a game. I don’t see him using an entire bench in 9 innings or using you one speedy contact hitter to pinch hit with no on and two out in the 8th so that he can’t be used in the 9th when you need him with runners on and a chance to win. It is the day in day out staggeringly bad decisions he makes on the field and from what we know about his inability to communicate with and inspire playes, that lead me to see him as a bad manager not trading Jake Fox or Mark DeRosa. Yes he got the Cubs to the post season in back to back years but he had the roster to do it. A good manager takes a good roster and makes it great, Lou took a good roster and made it mediocre. Good enough to get in the post season but not good enough to win a game while he was there. The much maligned Dusty Baker got the Cubs MUCH closer to WS than Lou ever has and he did it with a roster that was wildly uneven. Lou lives on his past success so how dare anyone question a guy who won the WS if he wants to play Scales in Sept.
He has to have a brilliant plan behind that, Howry, using Marmol with 6 run leads etc.
I am just too stupid to understand.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions
you are a loyal and intelligent fan no doubt
but you base too much of your anti Lou argument on opinion not fact, for example
Obviously playing Scales over Fox, Fuld & Colvin in Sept had ZERO impact on the standings but it is indicative of Lou wanting to show who is the boss and play favorites over what is good for the team.
did anyone in the dugout let you know such truth or is this an opinoin?
I also disagree, there are a lot of angles that could be why he played Scales. Maybe he wanted Scales to have as much time as he can to reward his years of dedication to get to MLB level, even if only for a small cup of tea.
Most of your opinions are good to read, but when you go into rant mode about something you truly disagree with, it gets funny at times.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Many things are open to interpretation
but I seriously can find a single logical reason for playing Scales on a daily basis in Sept. Rewarding minor leaguers is a time honored tradition. You bring them let them play a few games , great, you don’t play them daily over players you need to evaluate. If Lou had played Aaron Miles every day in Sept most people here would have gone ballistic but when he played Scales day after day you can find an excuse.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions
what was there left to evaluate about
Fox who was horrible post ASG and swung at everything? I am not saying I liked seeing Scales daily, but it was better than Fox, no doubt.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
when you're trying to keep Fox's value up
it may have been best to NOT play him. He wasn’t exactly stellar in the second half.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions
i used that already
and it fell on deaf ears, as she looked for a way to flip it
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I've made that same point before
Maybe it was a combo of not wanting to reduce Fox’s value while rewarding a career minor-leaguer who is on his way out the door.
I like Jessica and respect her views and her passion, but her Lou-sucks rants can get a little out of hand.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 1:01 PM CST up reply actions
Oh right the don't play Fox to increase his value theory
Got some nices bridges in Brooklyn for sale but even if you buy the idea of not playing Fox so as to make him look BETTER, it does not explain playing Scales over Fuld & Colvin. Career minor leaguers are rewarded with a call up ( which means some serious extra money) and a a little playing time ( though this is less meaningful to Scales who had been up earlier in the year) they can tell their kids about you do NOT play them on a daily basis over players you need to evaluate. How hard is that to understand ? Do any of you honestly believe it made sense to play Scales dailly even if you hate Fox ?
Ok end of the Scales/Lou rant. I will now work on my Fuld is the next
Mickey Mantle rant.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions
Fuld/Fox
what was left to evaluate? we know what they are before playing Scales as much. And nothing wrong with easing Colvin in IMHO.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Sam Fuld is fighting for a roster spot
He absolutely needed as many ABs as he could get to see what value he has. Colvin , hell this is exactly the kind of player you give ABs too. You don’t bring him up to sit him when you are out of the race and have a chance to see how he might play. Jeez how complicated is this stuff. I guess all those teams who bring up kids and let the younger players on the roster get more time in Sept are just really stupid.
The idea of benching Fox to keep his value high is just plain silly. Hey if we had benched Soriano after April when he hit OK I bet we could have traded him and not even had to eat most of his contract and we definately should have benched Hoff & Fonty when they started to slide but kept them on roster to make sure to keep their trade value up. You guys think I am obsessed ? At least I don’t think Lou decides or agrees to agree to bench a player because it will increase his trade value.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions
its a double sided sword no doubt
you use the player who is failing and his value does go down, you bench him and people complain about benching a player who is subpar for another subpar player who can catch a ball.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Ok one LAST time
This is about playing young player either from the farm or the bench. You are OUT OF THE RACE this is what you do. This is not by any means just about Fox. There was NO justification for Bobby Scales playing on a daily basis and I have watched a lot of baseball and never seen anything like that. I have seen vets in their last hurrah get a little more playing time in Sept if a team was out of it, I have seen young player who are plain awful play a lot in Sept but I have never seen someone like Scales get that much playing time.
I assume those of you that think this was OK , loved it when Dusty kept starting Neffi ?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 3:43 PM CST up reply actions
maybe Lou did it just to piss you off DS
cuz that seemed to be his only motive, since i am sure he had NO OTHER reason to do it, that we fans were not made fully aware of, since after all Lou should ALWAYS run his lineup card past the fans prior to making his professional decision on who plays and who doesnt.
Like Lou or not, I am sure he is not as far off his rocker as you want to believe he is, and I am sure he had good reason to do what he did, and like it or not, he is also paid to make that decision, while you sit here all season and off season complaining about everything Lou.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Neifi Perez is on line 2
I have watched a lot of baseball and never seen anything like that
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 7, 2009 8:36 AM CST up reply actions
yes, I think you are obssessed
You are Captain Doggie and you are obsessed with landing The Great White Lou.
But what makes it laughable is each time someone calls you out on it, you dismiss it and feign indifference as if it’s nothing…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Feign indifference ?
Hell NO ! Let’s just say I am as obsessed with Lou’s bad managing ( of course as I see it) as many here like Al, are with getting rid of Bradley. I guess it is an obsession when you see incredibly stupid moves over and over and get really, really angry. Funny thing is that by Sept kind of recall most people here feeling the same. I am a Cubs fan and hope springs eternal so I wish Lou the best cause I am stuck with him .
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions
is there something we're going to discover about Sam Fuld
that we haven’t already? really?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 6, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
One can only hope
Ok just kidding on that. Fuld is far from assured a spot on the roster, had Johnson not gotten injured he almost surely would have had no chance to play this year before Sept. and yes indeed you need to play him or any other player you need to evaluate over players have no chance at a roster spot.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions
how do you know
who does and doesnt have chance at the roster in 2010? are you part of the decision makers about this? there is a chance none of them make it, and a chance all of them make the MLB this season, none of us know for sure.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Wasn't Fuld with the team during Spring Training?
I’m seriously asking — what, exactly did he not get an opportunity to show us during ST and then late in the season when he was called up? He’s like a short nebbish version of Reed Johnson. Face into fence? Check. Sacrificing of the body to make the play? Check. The only real difference is the placement of hair on the head.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 6, 2009 7:21 PM CST up reply actions
Fuld has been up before ST also
2007 he was on the playoff roster for example. its not as if Fuld is unknown to the staff
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
if you buy the idea of not playing Fox so as to make him look BETTER,
No. the idea is not playing Fox so as to not allow himself to make himself look much, much worse as he plummeted deeper into his slump.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 6, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
which hurts his confidence more
failing on the field or sitting on the bench? i would think failing, but thats just my opinion
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Yes we all know Lou played Scales over Fox
to increase his confidence.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
not what i was talking about nice try
but rather due to Fox losing confidence with each blunder in the field, adn whiff at a breaking ball
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
He has been in pro ball for 7 years
I would not worry about his confidence. If we benched guys because younger players when they struggled they will never get a chanc to succeed( well OK Lou does that a lot anyway). Most players struggle at some point it is a fact of the game but I am pretty 99% of them would tell you being benched hurts their confidence a lot more than struggling at the plate.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
and in those 7 years, what has he done?
beena minor league player, just like Scales, so what difference does it make if Lou plays either one
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Because Scales will NOT be in the MLB next year
FYI I checked , Scales started more games then Fuld in Sept. so that was that good too. What’s the matter Fuld playing so well they were afraid to make him over confident ? Or at 27 was he too young to take the pressure ? Honest this is the last post but I want to make it clear this is NOT about Fox ( though I think most people are grossly underatting him) it is about letting a totally useless player start every day in Sept when those ABs were needed to access players who have chance to be regular MLB players. Please point out to me any other player like Scales who would start for ANY team in Sept ?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
we know at this point
it is about how much Lou shoujld be shot into space and blown up, because his only coaching ability is to piss you off. He is horrible, and has been (since a quote you found ) forv 17 years. He has no clue who to play and why, and the fans know much better, especially the ones who have made their decision that Lou sucks, no matter what.
I think I got your basic argument about the playing time for Scales locked down there. It isnt even about Scales, it is about Lou, and your obsession with making the world believe that Lou sucks, because that is what you have decided.
I truly dont care if Fuld/Fox/Scales is 21-27-97 as long as they can play. I know Fuld is the better OF of the three, but whats wrong with Lou letting Scales play when playing for nothing more than to spoil a team (maybe).
So Lou played Scales instead, get over it. No hard, no foul. FUld will still be in ST where he can be evaluated, Fox is in the AL where he belongs, and Scales is (IMO) still a coach in waiting
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
no harm no foul***
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I don't think
that his confidence had anything to do with it; it had to do with value on paper. Jake Fox never really had a place on this team, so you make him look as good as possible. As far as I’m concerned, this trade was FOR Fox, and Miles was the throw-in.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 6, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions
You forgot the "Look" part.
It was “Look, what do you want me to do?” LWDYWMTO for shorthand… ;)
Now only 12,859 on the "Cubs Season Tickets Waiting List"...
I'm not convinced Sandberg is the right guy to manage.
It’s hard to tell, because assessments of managers are so subjective. Even if he has the right stuff to be a good manager I don’t think you’d want him thrust into a win-now situation as an inexperienced manager.
I talked with my dad about this over Thanksgiving. He thinks the Cubs need to find a manager that’s young enough that they can keep him around for a decade or so. That way there’s continuity in the system and in the expectations the coaches have for players. He also doesn’t believe Ryno is the guy. Maybe Trammell is both young enough that he could be with the team a while and experienced enough to thrust into a playoff race.
many said Ozzie would bust on the South Side
so it is hard to say. I believe Ryno will be good once he is ready, but I could be wrong.. Now when he is ready, no one on this board knows, only he and the Cubs know.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I had to laugh at this part.
I talked with my dad about this over Thanksgiving. He thinks the Cubs need to find a manager that’s young enough that they can keep him around for a decade or so. That way there’s continuity in the system and in the expectations the coaches have for players. He also doesn’t believe Ryno is the guy. Maybe Trammell is both young enough that he could be with the team a while and experienced enough to thrust into a playoff race.
Trammell is almost two years OLDER than Sandberg.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I had to laugh at your incredible ability to miss the point.
Clearly Sandberg is young enough to lead the Cubs for many years if he’s good. It’s on the other side of things that he misses. He has no big-league coaching experience, let alone as a manager. He was a great player that has said the right things and is interested, but that alone won’t make a great manager. Having him take over the Cubs in win-now mode is the wrong way to find out whether he has what it takes. In the case of Joe Girardi we saw hints that he would be a good manager during his playing days. And even so his first job was with the Marlins.
I think that’s pretty clear from my second paragraph, but the second anyone casts doubt on the dream of a Cubs’ coaching staff with Sandberg as manager and Maddux as pitching coach people ’round these parts think they must be stupid. Really, who thinks Sandberg is old for a manager?
by aldimond on Dec 5, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think he's old for a manager
I just don’t think he’d be a very good manager. Maybe I’m wrong, but he’s not the guy I’d hire if I wanted to win now.
Girardi, you could tell. Not only that, but … to put it delicately, Girardi is a brilliant guy. Engineering degree from Northwestern. His siblings also are quite accomplished.
Ryno? Great ballplayer, obviously. But not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 5, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Girardi's engineering degree...
… has nothing to do with his leadership ability.
I think you’re underestimating Ryne Sandberg, who has drawn praise for his managerial ability in the minor leagues.
Does that necessarily translate to major league managing success? Maybe not. But your slap at him is undeserved.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
+23
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Who's going to criticize Sandberg?
Minor-league players? Not if they want to be in good standing with the organization. Reporters for the Peoria Journal Star or the Knoxville News Sentinel? They’ll want to promote the team as much as the team itself does. Controversy doesn’t drive people to read about minor-league teams the way it does about major-league teams.
The fact that people say nice things about Sandberg at this point doesn’t mean much. We really don’t know what he might be criticized for or how he’ll handle that when he is. Managing a team still trying to contend as its veterans age shouldn’t be his first big-league job.
The organization loves him.
He’s been consistently promoted, to the point that it’s become relatively clear that they’re grooming him for the big-league job.
(Also, if he gets the Cubs field manager gig, it won’t be his first job in the major leagues. I seem to remember him hanging around Wrigley for a few years.)
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
Ryno has also been
at ST working with MLB talent for years IIRC, so it isnt like he has never coached a MLB talent. Sure not for a season, but you have to start somewhere, and he is making each stop up the ladder cuz he believes it is the right way to do things, and that is a big plus IMO that he wants to learn how to coach while working with kids of all skill sets and ages.
and regarding no one talking about him due to wanting playing time, didnt he have Cubs on rehab stints thru the minors the past seasons?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Thanks for correcting me there.
Really, I had no idea until I just looked it up that Ryne Sandberg ever made it to the majors. Why, this whole thing makes sense now.
Back in reality, the point is that I’m not sure the organization loves him for the right reasons. There are things you can’t prove as a minor-league manager, and Ryno shouldn’t be proving those things in a win-now situation with the Cubs.
I believe the organization DOES love him for the right reasons.
Remember, the popular former player Jody Davis was made a minor league manager at the same time Sandberg was. Sandberg got promoted. Davis didn’t. That has nothing to do with his popularity and everything to do with performance.
If the Cub organization simply wanted to do the “popular” thing with Sandberg, they’d have given him the job in 2007 when Lou got it. He applied for it and was told he didn’t have any experience. Other people might have just gone home, but Sandberg agreed to get that experience.
Three years (after 2010, it will be four) of managing in the Cub system, IMO, qualifies him.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Fair enough
but in his time as a manager in the minors, he’s shown an ability to work with the kids and to develop their abilities. That’s as much as you are going to be able to show in the minors.
I don't think it is undeserved, Al
I saw Ryno up close for two years, and the main thing he showed a talent for was getting thrown out of games.
I think he can be useful in a subordinate role, but not as the top dog.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions
What are you basing your "not very sharp" comments about Sandberg on?!
Also, you know who else has an engineering degree from Northwestern? Literally thousands of people. None of whom should be MLB managers. Girardi’s college degree means absolutely jack squat.
For that matter, why on earth would it matter what his siblings have accomplished?! You’re probably a big Frank Stallone fan.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions
Poor Fredo
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions
Well, you're continuing your pattern of ignorance, I see
Put it this way: I’ve seen the guy probably from a different perspective than most other Cubs fans. He’s a wonderful man, but … Girardi would beat him in an IQ test, let’s put it that way.
And I think intelligence counts for something in that position. Obviously, you don’t. That says a lot about you.
And Frank Stallone sucks, although his brother isn’t exactly Robert DeNiro.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 1:07 PM CST up reply actions
Say what you will about Sly
but he wrote and starred in the Best Picture of 1976.
How many times did DeNiro do that? That’s what I thought…;-)
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
Sly had nothing to do with taxi Driver
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
forgot
SARCASM
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Yes, I like "Rocky," too (and "Rocky II," for that matter)
But “Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot!” is enough to blackball Sly forever.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
Even the deepest wells
eventually run dry.
Although, I did like “Rocky Balboa,” which he also wrote, directed, and starred in. It almost made up for Rocky IV and V, you just have to pretend they never happened.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
On that I agree
“RB” probably is my favorite Rocky movie since the original.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions
I stand squarely with you on this one, NBF
Rec’d
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
I agree 100% aldimond, Rec'd
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
The case for Sandberg would go something like
a) He’s shown that he can work with youngsters
b) He’s adapted his personality to fit the role
c) He was willing to work his way up
leading to
d) After 2010, the Cubs are likely to start a youth movement of some sort. It may be slow (maybe a couple guys), and the Cubs may still be in a win-now mode, but a youth movement is likely to start sooner than later. That may diminish some of the concerns about Sandberg’s inexperience and may actually bolster him, as he’s shown he can get kids to perform at a solid level.
Am I sold Sandberg is the right guy? Of course not. Then again, I’d probably say that to most inexperienced managers being thrust in. Ideally, he’d manage AAA and then work for a year or two as a bench coach, but the timeline is such that, barring a surprise, the managerial opening is there in 2011 and Ryne is probably, as of now, the favorite for the job. That said, at the end of the day, comes down to whoever is in charge.
Probably not, but....
… Fox is a better hitter than Scales. That’s what I think people were upset about.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yeah, it was pretty odd of Lou to keep running Scales out there.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
oh, I was upset, too
Especially because Scales wasn’t that good defensively.
Well, there may have been a reason that we just don't know about.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
That's a question that never was answered
that I’m still curious about. I wonder if the answer is, like you said, something we just don’t know about. Anything mentioned just doesn’t make sense so it leads me to think there’s something missing.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Dec 4, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, we'll probably never know.
Given Jake’s comments in the article chilango posted below, I wonder whether Fox just pushed too hard for playing time and eventually irritated Lou to the point where it had the opposite effect.
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
It is easy
To get a narrative going in your head isn’t it?
SQUIRREL!
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
And told him
stay away from the Wrigley dugout? Hope so.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 5, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
Ryno
will manage in Cubbie Blue, the questions is when, and I am excited to see it
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I usually agree with you, CT
but not this time. We’ll see.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions
It was not so much that he was a better hitter than Scales
but that Scales had NO chance of being on the Cubs roster this year. If he had say played Fuld and benched Fox it might have been easier to understand. The bottom line is that when you are out of it you need to play the kids when you have the chance. Soriano was down and the rest of the outfield had issues but Fox was not playing. He should have been getting starts at 3B to sub for A-Ram as well.
I don’t think letting go of McGahee was terrible but we sure could have used him this year and I suspect we may say the same about Fox in 2010
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions
You suspect
And you can make is so!
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
I think think the love for Fox may have reached bizarre
levels simply because the team, with several unlikable players was a disappointment and Fox, who seems like a nice guy, wasn’t. But not being a disappointment and being an important cog for next year are two different things.
Yes it was a interesting read
I was surprised and amused at the passion that became the “Jake Fox” fan club. I liked the guy he can hit but does not have a position to field. I am sure he is a great guy a fan fav. This is the best situation for him. Plus no more Aaron Miles, part of a bad offseason in 2008.
I wouldn't say that.
Fox sounded gracious for the opportunity, but confident in his ability. There’s nothing wrong with that.
By the way – I stepped away for a few hours, and I see both threads are still going strong. 1000 comments or bust on the original!
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
And as an extra challange 2000 here?
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
Idunno prof...
For the first time, I have a feeling that Fox is like the rest of us and has an ego which got bruised. Thus, this comment. If we take the comments from the other players when [name redacted]’s suspension was handed to heart, we should believe the majority.
Fox is thankful to Hendry in that piece, but seems as if he carries a bit of a chip on the shoulder.
And I can start posting arbitrarily to inflate numbers. I’m stuck at the office with nothing to do but can’t leave until my a-hole boss leaves.
"Every player is always a little biased toward himself, and I felt like he underestimated my abilities . . . but it just gave me more motivation to push through, keep fighting and get me to where I was last year."
A chip on his shoulder? Really? The dude wanted to play pretty badly and didn’t take ‘no’ to mean he should stop trying. Stop trying to make it more than it is.
Whoops on my reading
I skimmed the last paragraph and didn’t know the MB reference was literal.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 4:38 PM CST up reply actions
I can tell you that's how Jake carries himself
He’s always had that “chip on his shoulder” (i.e. ego) if you will, and has always trusted in himself (even if to a fault). Without speaking for him, I think he’s felt like he hasn’t had too much support in the Cubs’ Minor League system, dating back to his argument with Servais, while others have been pushed (Geovany Soto, for one).
To be honest, I might agree with him on his assessment of Hendry to an extent. When he was hitting, he got benched. Then he couldn’t hit in September. To top it off, the GM thought he had a Major League bat, but never told him where he should focus defensively, so as to improve. I’d be upset about that, too.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
Point well taken.
What I meant and maybe I failed at explaining it well was that Fox always said very selfless things to the Chicago media. Thusly, I had the impression that the benchings and whatnots didn’t bother him because he was a truly selfless person interested only in the improvement of the team.
You're right - that's how he always sounded.
I have a feeling that once he was hitting well and contributing, he figured his role would increase once Soriano went down for the year. And when that didn’t happen, I’ll bet that’s when he began to feel slighted.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
Hmm why would a clubhouse cancer do that ?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions
fox seemed like he was being nice
Would you like MB to stay? Maybe he can hang out with the rest of the kids next year.
yes, of course
that’s it. What the players are quoted on is them being politic and nice, but what they’re rumored to say via hearsay reporting, THAT’s what they REALLY feel!
o.0
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I think Fox was telling the truth
I think the concept of Milton as a “clubhouse” cancer is grossly exaggerated. Milton has plenty of problems with the press, fans and management but I don’t think he is some guy wrecking the clubhouse. Everyone sites quotes from players not leaping to his defense when he got suspended for his tirade against the fans but those guys were attacking him , they were upset and confused by his comments. I know Milton will not be with the Cubs next year but
I think the desperation in dealing him is really stupid.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 4, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
People seem to have this idea that Milton was causing trouble throughout the clubhouse . . . stealing people’s left socks in the middle of the night, over-starching their jerseys, and otherwise making their lives hell. Yet, most of what the players have said about him was that he kept to himself and didn’t seem to fit in. Certainly not what you want out of a highly paid teammate, but you could do a lot worse.
And by a lot worse, I mean in the clubhouse
Clearly his relationship with the fans and media was worse than that with his teammates.
And if that really is all it is...
… who cares? If he plays well himself and doesn’t bring his teammates down via his presence alone, there should be no problem.
Who cares if we (or the morans writing for the papers) like him or not? If he gives this team a better chance to win than the next guy, keep him!
(I might have to cut / paste the below disclaimer somewhere on my computer so i can come back and copy it for the dozens of similar comments I’ll have to make between now and a resolution to the Bradley situation…)
- Please note that the author of this post does not wish to keep Milton Bradley, and would instead prefer the desperation surrounding him cease, and his departure be handled in such a manner that the team is not handicapped by a crappy contract or a crappy player for the foreseeable future. Kthxbye. *
Dum spiro spero…
Follow me on twitter or else: @andrewjstone.
Don't forget
The jockstrap snapping! Ooooohhhh that Bradley!
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
“You’ll play as long as you hit.” That may not be as much as you think, Jake. The AL has breaking balls too.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 4:08 PM CST up reply actions
All this passion over Fox?!
Sheesh… you’d think we’d just traded DeRosa or something
oh wait…
Cubs Supreme in Baseball World.
Think of it as spring training for The Trade
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
What does this have to do with training for the [name redacted] trade thread?
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
Oh, for Christ's sake
Cubs fans should have to take some sort of baseball knowledge test before they can join the club.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 5, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
you cannot say it was dumb
until you see what three pitchers do for us.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I can tell you what they did for us last year when Ramirez went down:
Nothing.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
and whole Dero was injured
he woujld have helped us then too, right?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
He would've helped exactly as much as the pitchers we acquired.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
and three young arms
are more likely to help long term. DeRosa would not have pushed the Cubs to top tier team, so get over it
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Get over it? Wow, that's pretty patronizing.
The point is, this team is not built for the long term. We are supposed to be in WIN NOW mode. Three pitchers who might help us in the future are of little use when time is of the essence (aside from the repeatedly stated and glaringly obvious point that we had no suitable backup for 3B).
I don’t think DeRosa would have thrown this team on his back and carried them to the playoffs, but I can still see that it was an incredibly poor move by Hendry to trade him.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
I want to win now also
but young arms are never bad to have for two reasons
1. can help tomorrow
2, can be used to trade for missing pieces if in the running
DeRosa was (unlike many times in the past) traded while at high value. People bitch Hendry doesnt make smart moves, and trade after there is little to no value remaining. He traded while DeRosa was high and gets bitched about for doing exactly what fans have asked him to do for years. Its a double standard, and you are not taking that into consideration, since it doesnt help your argument on Fox or DeRosa or whichever player is next moved that you want to use in an anti-Hendry rant
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I give up.
You want to project your generalizations of other fans on me, go ahead, but believe it or not, I am capable of viewing each of Hendry’s trades individually. Just because I find fault with one does not mean I am “anti-Hendry” or “ranting” any more than liking one of his moves makes me a sunshine pumper.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
i guess saying people
made it all about you, wow.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
It doesn't, but this does:
you are not taking that into consideration, since it doesnt help your argument on Fox or DeRosa or whichever player is next moved that you want to use in an anti-Hendry rant
Or did I misread those pronouns?
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
that was not a generalization
that was a fact pointing towards your argument and what you are dismissing while bitching about DeRosa for the 13th month in a row. He was traded last December, I think there is nothing left to say about that trade that hasnt been said. So yes, it is time to move on about it, as I said above. DeRosa is not coming back, he was not the difference maked in 2007 or 2008 playoffs, so let it go and move on.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
This DeRosa pathology among a lot of Cubs fans
is ignorant and downright disturbing.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
C'mon, NBF. That's a little melodramatic, isn't it?
I’m not saying DeRosa was a savior, saint, or superhero, and I have no pathology. Take his name out of the equation altogether and look at what he was: a relatively inexpensive, flexible, good bat, adequate defense, good clubhouse guy, who was your backup at 3B.
I don’t care if his name was Forrest Gump, I think it’s a mistake to trade that value for some perceived future value when you have a window of opportunity right now to win. I’m separating emotion from it, just giving my opinion, and it’s not part of a Hendry Sucks pathology, either. I know that there are some for whom Hendry is like a cross to a vampire, but I’m not one of them.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
by Goodie1969 on Dec 6, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Maybe not you, G69
And I apologize for lumping you with the majority.
But it’s true the big rap on the Cubs was that their minor-league system is bankrupt. This was a chance to build that up while selling high on a player for once. It can be argued that with Fontenot earning a full-time spot and with Miles’ numbers the previous two years, that would make up for what an aging utility player who just had two career seasons would offer.
I thought it was a worthwhile deal at the time and I still think it was worth it. That it didn’t work out is no fault of Hendry’s.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Dec 6, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
A break from all this nonsense....
I have heard that Ryne Sandberg has been named manager of the Iowa Cubs. I can not find any articles to confirm. I just received a text from a friend back in Des Moines.
As a DM resident I am stoked about this news! If I can locate any links I will post a fanshot.
One step away when Lou gets canned in May.
by TJ11 on Dec 4, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
And Sandy Alderson will be the one to promote him?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 4, 2009 6:03 PM CST up reply actions
If Sandy Alderson is hired by this organization...
I would entertain the idea of taking a hiatus from being a Cubs fan.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 4, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe you should
ask BM. He seemed pretty sure about Alderson being with the Cub organization when Ricketts took over. ;-)
OK I don't know shit about basketball.
by SoulEater7 on Nov. 5, 2009 9:51 PM CST
wink wink
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 4, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions

Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
There's an overflow thread about the 23rd and 25th guys getting traded?
Just so you know… I hate you all.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Dec 4, 2009 6:44 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Did you read the post?
I’m disappointed, Worf.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 8:03 PM CST up reply actions
I did read it. I'm just commenting on the fact that we are approaching 1,000 posts on this topic
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
Ok
I suppose you have a point – actually, I am surprised that the comments keep coming.
Obviously the title was sarcasm…
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 8:27 PM CST up reply actions
its called boredom.....and a lack of any baseball activity worth discussing.
….one of the bigger baseball stories this week was about Jeter offering to teach Mark Sanchez how to slide feet first!
AAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!
who is the 24th?
or was that the other Aaron who was traded?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I think Patton was 25
Fox 24
MIles 23
maybe??
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Jake Fox was a nice player to have and a nice guy as well.
In late August, my wife and I attended a game at Wrigley Field and we were able to obtain some tickets right behind the Cubs dugout through a friend of the family (where real Cubs fans hardly can ever sit due to scalpers stealing all the tickets).
It was raining hard until we got to the park, but then it cleared up right before batting practice. My wife and I were sitting about 7 rows back from the Cubs dugout when Jake Fox and another teammate started walking up. I called out to him and said hi, and held my camera up as if to ask if I could take a photo.
Jake waived me down (past their old ushers, who need sensitivity training when dealing with fans) to the gate behind home plate, and as I walked up he flipped me a batting practice ball. He then signed the ball on the sweet spot and then he stood with me while my wife took our photo. He then told my wife and I that he hoped that we enjoyed the game and thanked us for coming. He was was one of the most genuinely nice baseball players I have ever met, along with Mike Fontenot, Ryan Dempster, Sam Fuld, and Jeff Samardzija.
My point is, that you rarely see players do that anymore. He could have nodded and went into the dugout like most players do now, but he didn’t. He also played hard every time I saw him out in the field and looked as if he never took it for granted that he was out there. Everytime they showed him in the dugout he had a smile on his face. I think it’s important that teams have guys like these who understand that they would not have a job if it wasn’t for the fans and who show their appreciation by spending a few minutes making a fan’s day, as he did for me.
Contrary to what some of the people on here think (that don’t know anything about baseball), he was a good hitter who could play several positions adequately, including catcher. He was a good weapon to have if the other team brought in a tough lefty to face someone like Fukudome, Fontenot, or Hoffpauir, and his presence alone was on the other manager’s mind during late inning switches.
He wasn’t Harmon Killebrew, or Babe Ruth, but he was a good baseball player with a great attitude towards the game and the fans. If we had to trade him, we should have gotten more for him, or traded him as a package towards something that would have benefited our team. Trading him for three useless players, just to save a couple million (a drop in the bucket to billionaires), is nothing but crap. With all of the undeserved benching that Lou Piniella gave him down the stretch (for players like Bobby Scales, Ryan Freel, and Andres Blanco), I knew he was in the doghouse (for no apparent reason) and that Hendry would trade him the first chance he got (and that it would be a dumb trade, as it turned out to be).
Last season showed that the Cubs need to make drastic changes in their front office, scouting areas, and field manager/coaches (except Alan Trammell). Since they have not, and these people have only continued to make the team worse (they have completely destroyed a 97 win team that was the best in the NL), Cubs fans have nothing to be excited about this season. We will continue to hear the same whining about payroll issues, the same dumb free agent signings (overpaying in years and dollars), the same dumb trades (like this one and the DeRosa trade), the same kicking team players in the teeth (like Reed Johnson and Kerry Wood), and a steadily worse record.
All I can say is good luck to Jake Fox. Like Mark DeRosa this past year, we’ll wish that we had you this coming season. But hey, we’ll be able to watch you hit your 35 HR’s this year on Baseball Tonight. At least you’ll have a manager who lets you show your talents.
by TheGrinch13 on Dec 4, 2009 6:45 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
35 HR's??? Really?
It’s nice to hear Fox was nice to you, but holy crap man…
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 4, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions
The elderly black woman who checked my receipt at Sam's Club today
was very nice.
SIGN HER UP!
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
does she fit the bill for MLB Commish?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Whether or not you agree, there are more people who think he's capable of a lot
Brendan Roberts thinks he’s a 30 HR guy (http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/baseball/flb/story?page=hp090813), for 2010 CHONE projects a line of .257/.316/.452, and Bill James projects an incredibly generous .284/.339/.546 line.
You can feel free to disagree, but don’t make this guy out to be the only one who thinks he’s capable of being a top tier hitter. Clearly, time will tell.
Although, I should say
I think his experience meeting Jake has blinded him a little bit. I wish we had gotten a little more out of the trade, but I don’t mind it.
and once again
I present exhibt A for why the games are played not dropped into a computer and the results handed out
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Rec- Nice Recap
Can I join your coalalition for the reasoned?
Unproductive move by the Cubs front office.
Always loyal to Leon
Lost in this "unproductive move" is the fact that Aaron Miles was dumped.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 4, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions
Who cares
If you have to give up your best bench player for nothing. Who’s going to come and hit the 2 or 3 run homer now in the 9th inning when we’re down by 2 runs and have two on? One of our many automatic out/.220 hitting back-up outfielders/infielders? Hey, at least they can play good defense!
"Best bench player"?
Since when?
And at least one of the players acquired may be in the 2010 bullpen.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
He was pretty clearly the best bat off the 2009 bench.
That’s considering Jeff Baker as the starting 2B, which is where he wound up.
Fox filled a role for the 2010 Cubs very nicely. And now that role is vacant. And I have absolutely no idea what Hendry’s going to do to fill that vacancy, but I have a feeling that it will be substantially more expensive and less productive.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions
We don't know that yet.
A year ago, would you have predicted Jake Fox would fill that role?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Of course not.
And I don’t know why I’d have to. But his AAA and MLB performance in 2009 demonstrated pretty clearly that he had some value for 2010, and the Cubs just cut bait for no reason whatsoever.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions
your best bench player
We traded Andres Blanco?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 1:59 PM CST up reply actions
We all love Andres Blanco for what he is.
Every team needs a backup middle infielder with a great glove.
That said, he was not going to be the first bat off the 2010 bench, and every team also needs a big bench power bat. And that was going to be Jake Fox. And now it will probably be someone making substantially more, and providing substantially less than the 11 HR and 44 RBI that we got from Jake in a partial season last year.
Maybe John Mabry is available. Or Phil Nevin. Or Jeromy Burnitz. Or Daryle Ward. Or Craig Monroe. Or Jody Gerut. Or any of the other iron-gloved 1B/corner OF types Jim has acquired over the last few years.
Point is, Jake could have filled a role on this 2010 team, cheaply and effectively. Much like Pie could have filled a role on the 2009 team cheaply and effectively.
Instead, Hendry sold Fox to the A’s for $1.7M, in order to partially atone for his boneheaded plan to give Aaron Miles $5M last year. Awesome work, Jim.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm pretty sure Burrell can match Fox's power numbers, albeit at a higher salary
So if we go that route (trading MB for Burrell), then we’ve filled the big bench power bat role.
Again, it’ll be at a higher salary, but at the same time, it also got rid of MB – which most folks seem to think is priority one. Ergo, there has to be some intangible benefit there.
Would you have wanted both Fox and Burrell on the bench? Or do you foresee some other outcome from MB?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
In that circumstance, who is your starting CF?
I don’t see how this shuffling of the deck chairs can result in anything but a severely weakened offense.
This is just the start of the (long expected) hangover from Jim’s awful, terrible, not very good offseason in 2008. MAN, that stunk.
(Besides, isn’t the rumor a 3-way deal in which we get Luis Castillo? I’m not nuts about that, either, but it leaves us with the gaping hole at “bench bat” again.)
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions
Well, all deck-chair shuffling aside, I've always felt the Cubs have the $ for one FA move...
…regardless of what happens to MB. So in this scenario, it’s probably Cameron. Or somehow Hendry reaches way up and pulls Granderson or Upton out of u-know-where and then we’ll all be pretty happy. In which case, $ are saved for possible mid-season move.
As for MB resolution, I’d rather have Burrell than Castillo. But if it is Castillo, then I guess Baker becomes your bench bat? That would suck for Baker personally, but it’d be good for bench strength. Not sure I’d call that a power bat though.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
if the 3-way did happen
the big bench bat would essentially be Jeff Baker.
he was not the best bench player on the Cubs
he was hardly a good player when he did get time
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Reed Johnson
and Koyie HIll were both better bench players than Fox last season, just to name two
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
really....Johnson is good but missed most of the year. Hill is a nice backup C but a weak hitter.
I would not understand why you would want Hill to bat instead of Fox.
this was about who was the best bench player for the Cubs
and yes I would take Reed at the plate over Fox, since Reed knows how to work a count and walk much better than Fox, and bases loaded is better than strike three sit down Fox
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Even when Reed was healthy, he wasn't as good as Fox.
Reed is obviously way better with the glove, but in 2009 at the plate, in a more or less similar # of AB, Fox was substantially better.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions
you know how to read what i type
what did i say about him bieng better than Fox?
WORKING THE COUNT
TAKING A WALK
which is big when compared to a batter who strikes out with the best of them.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Jake had more walks last year than Reed did.
Granted, in more AB. But it’s not a gigantic difference.
Secondly, since when did Fox “Strike out with the best of them”?
He struck out one more time than Jeff Baker, in 20 or so more plate appearances.
He struck out 30 times less than Koyie, in like 30 fewer AB.
For a power hitter, 46 K in 250 AB isn’t terrible.
And in the minors, he barely struck out at all. 31 times at AAA in 2009, and 104 K in 579 AB between AA and AAA in 2008.
He’s not Mark Reynolds. And for the record, even if he was – so what, if he’s hitting for power?!
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:56 PM CST up reply actions
and who is MLB proven
and who has been inconsistant both in the minors and majors? i will take MLB tested in a high pressure position
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Exactly, who was then?
You’re down by 2 with a runner on first and two outs in the 9th inning. Who are you going to send up to pinch hit then? Bobby Scales? Andres Blanco? Koyie Hill?
by TheGrinch13 on Dec 5, 2009 4:28 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
how about you give me 100% of the game situation
no one PH’s based on what you said alone without knowing ANYTHING else about the game. You are picking a small part of the situation.
and even so, NO Fox does not PH for me, since he strikes out too often, I am looking for a contact hitter to push the ball in RF
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
No reason to be obtuse.
There is going to come a point when the Cubs are going to need a bench bat with some power. They no longer have anyone who remotely fits that description.
Because they just sold the guy who did that job last year to the A’s for $1.7M. Because their GM finally realized that giving Aaron Miles $5M at age 32 was wildly inappropriate.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
good thing the off season is over and this is the team we start with
oops, there is still time to figure out the rest of the team. not one person on here knows what exactly is in the works to build this team, and many have jumped to conclusions that Hendry cannot get a better bat for the bench than Fox, which is a sad thought
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
We've seen Hendry at work for the last several years.
What gives you any confidence that he’s going to address an OF vacancy with any kind of efficiency or success?
Jeromy Burnitz? Todd Hollandsworth? Jacque Jones? Juan Pierre? Kosuke Fukudome? Milton Bradley? Joey Gathright? John Mabry? Cliff Floyd? Freddie Bynum? Jerry Hairston?
Forgive me for thinking that the emperor may not be fully dressed.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions
nice job picking the fly shit out of the pepper
and leaving other moves out of your evaluation, example:
DLee
Rami
Karros
Grudz
Harden
Simon
there is not one GM in the world of sports who is perfect, and each move is always a gamble. you can pick the good or the bad alone, but under Hendry we have had more success than we had in nearly 100 years prior. He got us to the playoffs more than any other GM has, and I respect that
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Not an OF in the bunch.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
and neither was Fox
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
then, um..
give up? I mean, what exactly do you want us to do about it?
The Cubs have had three winning seasons in a row, and went to the post season twice in two years for the first time in a century. That’s improvement.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
so is 3 playoff runs
in 10 years, something that had not happened in my grandfather, or fathers life prior to 2000-2009 time frame
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
"Playoff runs" doesn't mean what it used to.
The current run is more or less on par with the 1967-1972 teams consistently finishing 2nd and 3rd, while winning 85-94 games.
I wouldn’t quite put it up there with the 1980’s teams LCS appearances.
And of course, Hendry has resources which he predecessors simply did not. The system is hugely unfair in his favor – it’s like he’s playing poker and gets 2 extra cards. And still manages to finish just ahead of the middle of the pack.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions
Replace the General Manager, and reevaluate the org. philosophy.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
I'll get right one that.
o.0
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 5:11 PM CST up reply actions
You're acting like career pinch hitters are a hard thing to find
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 6:32 PM CST up reply actions
that is something I wish I had said
good point
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Well, if you want to use actual evidence...
I’ll take Scales. Bobby’s PH line:
7-14 (.500), 2 2B, 1 3B, 2 HR, 5 RBI, .533 OBP, 1.214 SLG
Reed Johnson as a PH:
4-15 (.267), 0 HR, 2 RBI, .353 OBP, .267 SLG
Jake Fox as a PH:
5-24 (.208), 2 2B, 0 HR, 3 RBI, .300 OBP, .292 SLG
That’s the “big bench bat” we can’t replace?
If you’re going to continue to make random claims about the greatness of Jake Fox, you might wish to check some numbers first. In all of your ranting, you have yet to make anything that even resembles a rationally thought out argument.
by fsuapollo on Dec 6, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
rec'd
but sadly this will not stop the Fox supporters from trying to find additional reasons why Lou is the reason Fox went 5-24. After all since 2003 (when Fox started in the Cubs org) Lou has been the reason he was not used more, etc. Would have nothing to do with his inability to be consistant and play at the MLB level
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Well I have no problem with Scales as a PH
It was his daily starts in Sept that as you can tell drove me crazy. I realize you don’t mean me but just to clarify.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 6, 2009 10:57 PM CST up reply actions
No worries, Doggie
Totally agree. Just replying to Grinch, who keeps harping about the loss of the “big bench bat” of Jake Fox.
It still mystifies me as to why Scales was starting.
We could have dumped Aaron Miles for the cost of his contract.
Essentially, Hendry just sold Jake Fox’s entire cost-controlled prime to Billy Beane and the A’s for $1.7M.
That is a great investment by Beane, and a stupid move by Hendry, and it’s the natural result of many of Hendry’s other stupid, costly moves.
And now, the Cubs’ bench is weaker.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly right.
I was hoping that the new owners would have cleaned house and held Hendry responsible for the mess he made, but it looks like it’s just going to be business as usual.
by TheGrinch13 on Dec 5, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Thankfully they also hold him responsible for the success we have had in recent years. I don’t believe anyone thinks Hendry is the greatest GM, but it’s kind of a pointless argument to cherry pick moves claiming his greatness or nitpick other decisions to call for his head.
Jim Hendry has not been the GM for the new ownership and he also created a team and hired a manager that won us two Central crowns. Why would they fire him before seeing for themselves how he does his job?
One baseball game, he came to the plate and heard a woman in the crowd shout to the pitcher, "I'll make you a chocolate cake if you strike out that 'so-and-so'!" Says Strong: "I hit that ball out of the park. Then I looked at her like, 'Do I get a cake now?' "
What's the scenario there? How could we have gotten rid of just Miles?
Obviously, we could have just released him and eaten all the $. But are you thinking something else? Some scenario where Oakland (or anyone else for that matter) would have given up something for Miles? If so, would that something have been anything of substance?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
had they moved MIles alone in this deal
the anti-Hendry Army still would complain about it
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I certainly wouldn't have.
If he’d traded Aaron Miles and a check for Aaron Miles’ 2009 salary to the A’s for insignificant prospects, I would have praised Hendry.
There was no reason to include a top 10 performer from last year’s team in the mix.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions
IF Fox was top 10
that shows how bad we were
Fox = Hoff
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
They could have just released him.
Problem solved.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions
True, as they could with Bradley.
If, us as fans, have no interest in improving the on field product in 2010, outright releasing these guys is fine. As I want Hendry to upgrade positions, like Centerfield, moving money from roleplayers and guys without starting jobs is fine with me.
I’m tempering any angst on the moving of Fox expecting the money saved to go into CF. If in the end, all that moved was money saved, I’m unhappy later.
at daver's request, Let's frontload this B**ch!
just release the expensive players
and when the tickets are raised dont complain, right?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Exactly - let the
guys go, become the post WS Marlins and raise tix and beer 50%.
at daver's request, Let's frontload this B**ch!
If Fox hit 35 homers this year for an AL team
He would’ve been tied for fifth with Adam Lind. No wonder this trade caused BCB to explode.
It caused it to explode
…because most people think that it was dumb, which it definitely was. Other GM’s must spend a lot of time laughing at the management of our team.
by TheGrinch13 on Dec 5, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Um, no
As I write this, 78% of the 276 people who voted in the poll of the front page “like” this trade (36% don’t care about losing Fox, and 42% are sorry to see him go, but thought it was worth dumping miles). Maybe if Al adds an “I hate this trade, Jake Fox gave me a baseball once” option to the poll, then these numbers may change, but I guess that’s up to Al.
Everyone was pretty happy about trading Felix Pie last year, too.
Until about August, when we all realized that Kosuke couldn’t play CF, Joey Gathright was at home counting the million dollars Hendry gave him, the team couldn’t score runs to save their lives, and Pie was ripping up the AL to the tune of a 1.000 OPS all month.
“We had to trade him because we can’t help ourselves and we probably weren’t going to play him anyway” is not a valid rationale for taking action. It sounds more like describing a pathology.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:14 PM CST up reply actions
Right.
If Hendry and our management were so horrible, other GMs would be lining up to try and rip Hendry off.
If even ONE other GM thought Jake Fox was the next David Ortiz (or even Ortiz-lite), they would have made a better offer than taking Miles and shipping off three (what you consider to be) worthless prospects.
I just don’t get why you fail to compute that.
Your recap was nice - I'm glad you had that experience
But you’re letting that influence your judgement of Fox’s abilities.
I’d love for the Cubs to win the World Series with a roster of 25 good guys. Given the choice, though, of say, 75-87 with good guys, or winning it all with a roster of a-holes, I’d prefer to win.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 8:06 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, I agree with that.
Now we now why Grinch was so against this trade — he met Jake Fox and Jake was nice to him.
There is no way on Earth Jake Fox will ever hit 35 HR in a season in the major leagues. Ever.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I'm not quite so sure of that.
I think Fox has the power to hit 35 HR in a good year given a full season of at-bats. It’s hardly a guarantee, but I think it’s a possibility. In order to get all those opportunities he’d have to improve his plate discipline and contact skills against major-league pitching. He did that against minor-league pitching after struggling a couple times after moving up levels.
Again, no guarantees. I wouldn’t put the probability of Fox having a 35-HR season all that high. But he does possess the ability to hit baseballs a long way. Weirder things have happened than Fox hitting 35.
As I said above...
… Fox appears to have the same skillset (catcher who really can’t catch, so he moved around to different positions) as Craig Wilson, who had one good year and a few lesser ones for the Pirates and a couple other teams.
He won’t be as good as Wilson, and Wilson flamed out at 30. Fox is already 27.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I imagine Craig Wilson must have been, well, Jake Fox-like on defense...
… as the moment his hitting dropped below league-average he was out of a job. Wilson appears to have had a number of decent years, including one where he got significant at-bats. In that one year he hit 29 bombs; not far from 35. The year before that he hit 18 homers in 344 PA; given 700 PA that’s almost exactly a 35-HR pace. A Jake Fox-Craig Wilson comp doesn’t help your case.
It’s very possible that if a few things had gone differently for Wilson that he could have had a 35-HR season. The combination of those things are, together, not all that likely, and they didn’t end up happening of course, but it would be silly to say that there’s “no way on Earth” Craig Wilson could have hit 35 HR.
Jake Fox is probably a longer shot than Wilson was after his first partial MLB season in 2001 to ever have a 35-HR season. Wilson showed a reasonable ability to get on base throughout his minor-league career and into the majors that Fox has had to lose and regain at every level. On the other hand Wilson played mostly in the NL where he had to play defense. Off the top of my head I’d put the odds that Fox ever has a 35-HR season somewhere between 1/500 and 1/50. Not likely but far from “no way on Earth”.
FWIW, I’m not hating on the trade at all. The odds of Fox or Miles producing much for the Cubs were pretty long. The relievers they picked up might have a slightly better shot.
But Wilson never got the chance to DH for a whole year
Not sure that Fox will either, but if he does – and especially if he were in a more hitter-friendly park than Oakland – it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that he hits 35 HRs. Stranger things have happened in baseball…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
the point is
it’s not likely.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
I think if people in baseball thought Fox could hit 35 plus homeruns he would not have had to wait til 09 to get a chance to play more than a cup of coffee in the majors.
Brennan and Booth their Story Really begins November 2009
by puckishcubsfan on Dec 5, 2009 5:55 AM CST up reply actions
He never got a chance at all
He did nothing but hit in the minor leagues, and he hit well when he got up here. There’s no excuse for the benching that he received. He played 3B and 1B adequately. When Soto went down, Koyie Hill caught over 20 days in a row while Fox was sitting on the bench. That is just plain garbage managing.
He did nothing but hit in the minor leagues
You’re right- he sure never learned to play defense.
I like Jake Fox, by the way, I just think you are overreacting.
yet he is wrong
there are some low offensive stats in the minors as well from Jake. He has been inconsistent
and people forget he also had a 3 game stint in 2007 where he didnt hit well in Chicago
http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=fox—-003jac
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
You call Lou an idiot for not playing fox when soriano gets shut down. thats understandable
Calling Lou a bad manager for having hill play over fox when soto went down is an extremely stupid thing to say
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
and more teams would have been
trying to trade for him before the deadline, and once the season ended
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
You obviously didn't read the entire post.
Jake Fox had better stats than most of the roster, and he never played. His average took a hit because there were times that he batted once in a five game period while guys like Bobby Scales played in his place. You can’t stay fresh when your manager won’t give you a chance.
We’ll see how many HR he hits this year. I have a feeling that some of you will be putting your foot in your mouth. We’ll be trying to get him back within a few years, except the A’s will get a whole lot more in return than we got when that happens.
I always say...
You know how you played the game the right way?
Look up at the scoreboard after 27 outs. If your number is bigger than the other guy’s, you played the right way.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
He would test me a lot
If he goes 30-0 with a .31 ERA and 300Ks, maybe. Otherwise, fuck him.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
aha... see? Character does matter to you...
Underneath all that Klingon fur, you really are a good guy after all… ;-)
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Glad Fox was great to you. It is a great story that gives us "hope" for athletes. Seriously.
And I would sure rather have a team full of those guys than malcontents. Now, let’s look at some other aspects of your post.
According to his ESPN player card, Ryan Freel was released by the Cubs on July 4th. So Fox was never benched for him.
Regardless of your position on his abilities, Andres Blanco may very well have a role on the 2010 Cubs. Therefore it certainly was worth getting a longer look at him in September. Of course, he also plays 2B and SS - so Fox was never really benched so Blanco could play.
I, as many others do, agree regarding Bobby Scales’ playing time.
I also agree that Fox would be a nice player to have on the bench. He can play corner OF, 1B, 3B, and C. He plays none of them well, but perhaps not as tragically as some feel (particularly with limited exposure). He committed two errors in 43 chances as a 1B, two errors in 48 chances at 3B, zero errors in seven chances at C, three errors in 38 chances in LF (which is very poor), and zero errors in two chances in RF. So he committed seven errors in 138 total chances. Not good.
He is cost efficient, which is a good quality as a bench player.
As a hitter, people are making too many declarative statements. The “Fox lovers” — even if they acknowledge that he “wasn’t Harmon Killebrew or Babe Ruth” — seem to believe Fox would have kept killing the ball if only he had stayed in the line-up. They fail to acknowledge that, regardless of inconsistent ABs, Fox was really struggling with breaking balls at the end of the season.
I hope Jake does hit 35… but that is a real stretch. He hit 11 in 216 ABs. DLee hit 35 in 532. So if Jake’s HR rate stayed the same, he would project to hit 27.
Those who are too easily dismissing Fox note the struggles with the breaking balls… but fail to think that perhaps Fox would adjust with more ABs (either last season or in the future) or account for who will provide any power threat off the bench (though the likelihood is simply that that player isn’t yet on the roster).
As a PH, others have noted Jake’s numbers were pretty pedestrian. Now maybe they’d get better… and frankly I liked the idea of having him on the bench. On the other hand, the idea that managers were scheming to avoid Jake Fox is probably a bit over the top.
The point is we just don’t know enough about what Fox will – or won’t – be as a hitter. He has 230 total MLB ABs. As such, any declaration is premature.
As for the other baseball personnel… why is Trammell exempt from your wrath? There is nothing we fans could really know about the job AT is doing as a bench coach. I’m not saying he isn’t a good coach… but who knows?
The front office has NOT “completely destroyed” the Cubs. The Cubs’ offense seemed to overachieve in ‘08. It certainly underachieved in ’09. There’s really no reason to believe they shouldn’t “regress to the mean” and be more productive than last year, though less than two years ago.
The “whining” about payroll issues is financial reality. The Cubs’ spend more than enough money. Some has been spent wisely… some has not. It happens to all teams. Some FA signings work out… some don’t. It happens to all teams.
I mostly agree about Kerry Wood… but how have the Cubs kicked Reed Johnson in the teeth? By not offering arbitration to a nice, useful player who has had injury issues and may be resigned at a lower salary?
“A steadily worse record.” Really? The Cubs went from 66 wins (06) to 85 (07) to 97 (08) to 83 (09). That is “steadily” worse?
You think this was a bad trade. We get it. IMO, the difference between those who “love” the trade and those who loathe it is fairly simple. Those who like the trade realize three positives from the deal: 1) no more Miles, 2) save $1.7M, and 3) get three at least mildly intriguing pieces from Oakland.
On the other hand, those posters who are criticizing this trade center their argument on four things: 1) Fox was a “weapon” as a hitter, 2) the prospects are worthless, 3) we should have gotten more for Fox, and 4) Hendry will blow the savings from shedding Miles. The problem is none of these can be substantiated: 1) see above, 2) nobody “knows” how prospects will turn out, 3) the idea that Hendry turned down a better offer for Fox is kind of laughable (“Fox, Miles, and two minor league arms for Granderson? Naaahh… I have a better deal in Oakland.”) and 4) we don’t know how the Miles money will be spent.
If you really think “Cubs fans have nothing to be excited about this season”, then don’t be one. Otherwise, let’s see what else happens this off-season and see how the team plays when the season rolls around. Only time will tell if this was the best, or worst, move of the winter… more likely… it is just another pretty minor move.
by fsuapollo on Dec 4, 2009 8:35 PM CST up reply actions 14 recs
Well written
I don’t often feel like reading through comments this long on a blog, but this was good.
Rec’d
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 8:44 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks… didn’t realize it was THAT long until I hit post. Shows how badly I wanted to avoid working.
That in itself deserves to be recommended...
Now only 12,859 on the "Cubs Season Tickets Waiting List"...
WTF
you are using logic, reasonable thinking, no ranting and insulting, and eliminating opinon for facts? Al, delete this now please, this is obviously spam
/sarcasm
Well written and rec’d
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Obviously I need to get a baseball video game
So I can say this myself:
("Fox, Miles, and two minor league arms for Granderson? Naaahh… I have a better deal in Oakland.")
Because ain’t no one saying it in real life. :D
Good comment.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 8:56 PM CST up reply actions
You need to post more....
…because that was simply one of the best reasoned responses I’ve ever seen on this site.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 4, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks Carmen. I’ve been reading BCB since I learned about it two years ago. Just now dipping in to posting.
As my friends know, I tend to be wordy… but usually fairly well thought out. At least hopefully.
Yes, seemed to be well thought out.
I agree with Carmen – join the discussion!
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 4, 2009 9:31 PM CST up reply actions
i third that
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
great to have you on board
all I’m good for is a TWSS or two. You, on the other hand, are the real deal.
Cubs Supreme in Baseball World.
What man alive is?
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -- Yogi Berra
Turn Wearing Sues Shirt?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
oh come now, Em. You "hee" with the best of them... ;-)
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Ryan freakin' Freel???
Wasn’t he released in July??? Give me a break. I’m glad he was nice to you. He’s NOT going to hit 35 home runs in the majors next year. JOBU NO HIT CURVE BALL.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 8:53 PM CST up reply actions
no, you appear to be the one
happy when Cubs fail.
If Jake Fox can go on to be another Frank Thomas, then good on him. That’ll be excellent, and I’ll hope for him to join the Yankees or the Red Sox so he can have a good chance at a ring. But he’s not an NL player. He has no position. He was barely adequate at best. He needs to be a DH.
But it’s not likely. More likely is that Fox has peaked, and will, hopefully, do well enough next year to get a nice multi-year contract to be a DH or bat off the bench for an AL team, and will eke out a journeyman career in the bigs.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 4, 2009 11:24 PM CST up reply actions
I am not happy when they lose but I am not such a homer that I can't see when they are messing up.
You stay in your happy world where everything Jim, Lou, and especially Bradley is just fine.
Bet you miss Baker too.
As in Dusty?
Because I’m just fine with Jeff Baker.
I’ve never suggested that everything is fine. You’re very binary, you know that?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions
I don't give two
poops about Dusty Baker.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
Good
But he at least won a playoff series with the Cubs. Lou is WAY more of a manager than him and he has the same amount of playoff wins as you do in 2007-08. So what does it matter if Lou got them there?
If you really look at 2007-2009 and say that Lou Piniella has not had a good run with the Cubs, then nothing I say can help you.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
He's been decent and I like the guy but last year was BAD.
He managed like he didn’t care. He also managed like shit in the playoffs.
like I said...
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions
Drew .. .

Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we will go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
hiya
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 6, 2009 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
That was a curveball
That Jake hit into the stands for a grand slam this past season. If you don’t believe me, go to the tape. You should know something about baseball before you comment.
Your ability to make 1 instance of things seem like the norm is astounding
This Chicago Cubs team is currently Aaron free. Keep it that way, please.
by jesus christos on Dec 5, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
God I hate that phrase
“you should know something about baseball before you comment”.
Really? Because I should have to prove bona fides to be a fan? Hell no.
ANECDOTE DOES NOT EQUAL DATA.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 2:02 PM CST up reply actions
You should know something about baseball before you comment.
is a bad thing to say when you are flipping out over Fox being traded.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Right, and...
…. it’s not acceptable here. Everyone here knows something about baseball, some more than others. Simply because you disagree with 99.9% of the people here about Jake Fox (not you, Tim, this is to Grinch) doesn’t mean they “don’t know anything about baseball”.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al Yellon on Dec 5, 2009 5:07 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
MAKE IT GREEN

I am tired of hearing that kind of specious logic — that to have an opinion to be admitted here has to pass some sort of test of baseball knowledge — it’s a thought stopping cliche that doesn’t belong here.
Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we will go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
Maybe we could have kept him as an usher or a tour guide at the soon to be built Cubs Museum.
One baseball game, he came to the plate and heard a woman in the crowd shout to the pitcher, "I'll make you a chocolate cake if you strike out that 'so-and-so'!" Says Strong: "I hit that ball out of the park. Then I looked at her like, 'Do I get a cake now?' "
What position would he be playing to hit these 35 hrs?
One baseball game, he came to the plate and heard a woman in the crowd shout to the pitcher, "I'll make you a chocolate cake if you strike out that 'so-and-so'!" Says Strong: "I hit that ball out of the park. Then I looked at her like, 'Do I get a cake now?' "
The people crying over losing Fox
Probably thought Choi, Bobby Hill, Cedeno, Murton and Rich Hill were major losses…
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Dec 4, 2009 8:46 PM CST via mobile reply actions
how could you forget
Kevin Orie
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Yeah
I forgot Jason DuBois too…
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Dec 4, 2009 9:39 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I met Orie
with the Round Rock Express a few years back (before RR went AAA) and he was nice. I think the kids got potential to hit 30-35 HRs and play a gold glove caliber 3B (he can also play some 1B) I say sign him to a 45 year 1 gazillion dollars, heavily front loaded contract based on his kindness
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
With Fox out of the way, maybe DuBois gets another chance this year!
Lord knows we need someone with some pop on this bench.
The pass Hendry gets around here is just remarkable. The net result of this trade is “Jake Fox for $1.7M.”
Does that really excite anyone? Especially now that Hendry has to shop for Fox’s replacement?
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Dec 5, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions
Well, we all have our pets
I personally wanted to keep the Simon/Karros platoon going…
One quibble, though. Who in the hell thought Cedeno was a loss?
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
OK, anyone who wasn't involved in conceiving Cedeno?
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
I never was on the Cedeno bandwagon
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
best thing about topics like this
where the sky is falling over notihing……..some amusing pics pop up
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Like this picture of Fox and Miles doing their imitation of the Big Z/Fontenot piggy-back ride pregame ritual?

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 5, 2009 2:06 AM CST up reply actions
ummmm
yup
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
This is comment #1131 total for both threads
I shudder to think what will happen when THE TRADE goes down.
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
by eths on Dec 5, 2009 1:31 AM CST via mobile reply actions
The BCB server will go down and there will be mass hysteria as people run naked out into the snow screaming...
…or not… ;)
It DOES make you wonder though, doesn’t it?
Now only 12,859 on the "Cubs Season Tickets Waiting List"...
*** BREAKING NEWS *** Hell declared a disaster area *** Heavy snow extinguishes demonic fire *** Interview at 10 EST ***
demonic fire
Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.
- The Mock Turtle, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll -
Hell has frozen over

That’s not true!!! WHY THE F*CK WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU AHOLE!! Ok maybe your right but you gotta give a little something here for it to work. I don’t know what I’m going to do this is the worst thing I’ve ever read, this day could not get any worse. Fine, F*ck it, you’re right.
by Ditkavsworld
and you will continue to poke at Drew
for being supportive of a good player with a bad head. No matter how redundant it is for you to make the same comment about it over and over and over and pver
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
its called typo
not that i expect u to know that since it doesnt involve a MB bash
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
If he returns I hope he produces
if he doesnt return, whatever we get I hope produces. I want the CUBS to win, and more than I care about who is wearing the jersey to make it happen.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Fox
I’m just surprised. When I hard we traded Fox I thought we would have gotten Jeter (and Arod too if we had thrown in Hoffpauir)
Fox was more likely to be 2010’s version of 2009 Hoffpauir than Mark DeRosa.
Brennan and Booth their Story Really begins November 2009
be happy
for jake he had no spot on this team. i wish hendry would star trading guys for the right reasons instead of salary dumps. but 2 cthumbs up for unloading miles. talk about creative.
Yeah, that was so creative.
The comments just keep getting dumber and dumber as this thread gets longer and longer.
I'm a huge Fox fan.
But he has no place on the Cubs. He wanted a larger role, which the Cubs cannot provide going forward. He deserves a larger role; a role he’ll only find in the AL where he can DH most of the time. Did he get slighted a bit this past year? IMO, yes. Scales was just as bad defensively and had no business starting over Fox in LF.
We trimmed a bit of payroll, dumped a useless player, and acquired some bullpen potential. We had to part with Fox, but it comes with the assumption that he’ll get a chance to truly prove himself, which I’m happy about.
I wish Fox could play somewhere on the field where he wouldn’t be a liability to the Cubs, but he can’t. The blind, passionate fan in me wishes Fox could have found a place on the Cubs where he could thrive. But my head sees an aging prospect nearing 30 who has never found a place in the big leagues. I’m guessing that’s with reason.
ironic comment
is ironic.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions
I haven't skimmed the entire
1500 posts about this topic, but I haven’t found that many people in “angst” about losing Fox.
Fox was my favorite player this season. He really was. I was excited about this trade for two reasons: 1. No more MIles. 2. Fox should get a chance to prove himself.
I don’t think Fox will ever amount to much, but I’m still interested to see if he can carve a niche for himself in the Majors for the next 6-7 years.
Craig
Wilson had 99 career home runs and was better defensive wise than Jake Fox and he could run a fair bit better than Jake, especially early in his minor league career. Might have hit more home runs if he didnt have a severe wrist break early in his career.
Wilson was NOT better defensively.
He couldn’t catch, either, which is why they kept shuttling him from position to position.
I agree that Wilson was a better all around player. That’s why he already had 76 major league HR by the time he was as old as Jake Fox is now.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Well, the Pirates actually gave him a chance to play though.
Oh well, good luck to him in Oakland. We’ll see how all this shakes out in 2010.
For the record --
While I’m against this deal, and think that it hurts the 2010 Cubs, it is obviously not in the same ballpark as Hendry’s missteps from last offseason.
Trading Pie and DeRosa for Aaron Heilman and some minor league pitchers who would not help the 2009 Cubs — and then spending the DeRosa savings on Aaron Miles and Joey Gathright…. well, that’s a special kind of bad GMing that only comes around once in a great while.
The fact that he had to give Jake Fox away a year later in order to save $1.7M is just a symptom of the underlying rot.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
Give the guy a chance to have an entire offseason's worth of moves...
… before you call it “underlying rot”.
Hendry made some mistakes. He’s trying to fix them. Tom Ricketts is giving him a chance. Why won’t you?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
better question
if you were Hendry who was going from Trib-Zell and the “we have to keep the stock holders happy” to the new ownership that should have a different care about wins instead of the financial bottom line ONLY, wouldnt you want a chance to fix some of the issues:? The back loading of contracts, I am 99% sure were Trib-Zell;s idea wanting to get the money now from the players success and letting the new owner foot the majority of the bill. I do not blame Hendry on that one as much as many do.
To me this is a prime example of why new owners are right for giving Hendry a chance under them
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 5, 2009 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
This Miles-Fox thread is one of the more amazing things I've read over my years of lurking and posting at BCB...
If this were a chess game, many of the folks posting here would be in an uproar after the first two pawn moves.
Hendry can’t win. No matter what he does, he gets roasted. Let the full off-season play out. Let’s see what kind of team we take TO Spring Training and then what kind of team we actually bring north on Opening Day.
Now only 12,859 on the "Cubs Season Tickets Waiting List"...
by Zeke on Dec 5, 2009 7:57 PM CST reply actions 4 recs
+1
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
It's not a Thread.
It’s an Event.

"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." ~Winston Churchill
But if we get this post and the other one to 2010 comments...
… we’ll have a winner next year!
it is amazing
more posts about Fox after he is traded than the entire time he was in the Cubs org (2003 to 2009)
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Really.
I like Fox (a former Lugnut!) and wish him well in Oakland, but I’m not going to lose any sleep over this move as it pertains to the Cubs.
My biggest memory of Jake was him catching Mark Prior’s rehab starts at Olds Park Lansing in May 2004.
Good luck Jake and maybe I’ll see you at Comerica when you come to play the Tigers.
Now only 12,859 on the "Cubs Season Tickets Waiting List"...
If anyone who understand Fangraphs is reading still reading this
thread, please advise if I understand the Aaron Miles data.
The 2009 actual dollars show -5.7M. With his contract at 2.7, does this imply he was paid 8.4M above his production? Further, if this number was his trade value for 2010 (I realize it will be higher), is it reasonable to say Jake Fox was valued in the trade, solely considering Aaron Miles value as somewhere between the $1.7M remaining on AM’s contract (uneaten) and $7.4M (AM’s value plus remaining contract) to make this deal equal as a one for one.
If accurate, would those saying Hendry didn’t get enough back believe Fox could have been valued at $7.4M as part of this trade?
at daver's request, Let's frontload this B**ch!
I'm afraid I can't be of much help...
…as I’ve only recently begun delving into the “Value” part of Fangraph pages. I know Fangraphs defines the dollar amount as “WAR converted to a dollar scale based on what a player would make in free agency.” But I’m not really comfortable taking the amounts that literally. I just look at them as a dollar value assigned to the player’s production during the year in question. It doesn’t seem realistic to actually try to apply the amounts to a theoretical free agency bid.
So is it safe to assume the paranthetical amounts are negative? Why don’t they just use a minus sign like they do for WAR? Is it an accounting thing?
Catch my act on Twitter as @dat_cubfan_dave.
yes, it's an accounting thing
values in ( ) are negative.
But I don’t know if you can add in the part of the salary that was already paid out. It’s a sunk cost.
I still think the trade was for Fox, and Miles was the throw-in.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 7, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions
I was trying to quantify a "value" for Fox
and thought using Miles’ negative value would be fun. Fox had to more than equal the value deficit created by Miles, whether 2010 contract at minimum or more if Miles’ 2009 contemplated.
Really, I’m waiting for the “Hendry gave Fox away” crowd to quantify how much more Hendry should have received when pairing Miles & Fox.
at daver's request, Let's frontload this B**ch!
Apparently
Peavy, Roberts and Granderson.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Dec 7, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
Does jake fox
know he has so many threads dedicated to his being traded?
One baseball game, he came to the plate and heard a woman in the crowd shout to the pitcher, "I'll make you a chocolate cake if you strike out that 'so-and-so'!" Says Strong: "I hit that ball out of the park. Then I looked at her like, 'Do I get a cake now?' "
Holy Christ...
…on a crutch! I take time off (okay, a lot of time off), and now I’m possibly stuck watching another year of Miles?! Gah! I won’t mind seeing Fox out here in Bump City, but Miles? And I was so happy when the year ended.
As to the prospects: Not collectively bad. Though, I would’ve gave up Miles, Fox, & cash considerations to get our hands on Jemile Weeks. Our middle-IF would look great with him and The Hak.
"With Chance on first, and Evers on third,
Great things from the Cubs will soon be heard."

by 























