It's Official: Rich Hill To Orioles For PTBNL
From the official press release:
The Chicago Cubs today traded left-handed pitcher Rich Hill to the Baltimore Orioles for a player to be named.
![]()
photo via nbcsportsmedia3.msnbc.com
Hill, who turns 29 on March 11, went 18-17 with a 4.37 ERA (164 ER/337.2 IP) in 64 appearances (57 starts) in all or part of four seasons with the Cubs (2005-08). The southpaw went 11-8 with a 3.92 ERA (85 ER/195.0 IP) in a career-high 32 starts in 2007 but went 1-0 with a 4.12 ERA (9 ER/19.2 IP) in five starts with the Cubs last season before being optioned to Triple-A Iowa on May 3.
The Orioles, now the official dumping ground for failed Cubs (thanks, Andy), take on the nearly 29-year-old Hill. Hill had a great 2007 after some outstanding years in Triple-A, but somehow lost it last year. Whether he can get it back is now Baltimore's problem.
The move leaves an open slot on the 40-man roster, so I'd expect another move before pitchers & catchers report to Mesa a week from Friday, on February 13.
73 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jeez, do you think the O's would take me?
I once threw a no-hitter in Wii baseball.
Old Style is the nectar of life.
Wii baseball?
Psh. I threw a perfect game in MVP 05. Twice
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
You'd probably beat Rich Hill at Wii.
Or MVP 05.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Oh Yeah
In 1992 , as a sophmore at Taft High School I threw a no htter in High School (Taft vs. Austin High)
does Al Bundy Trophy Pose
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
I was undefeated
in Little League (10-0) in 1967. Might be a little old now but I could be a pitching coach.
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
by tucsoncubsfan on Feb 2, 2009 11:35 AM CST up reply actions
I played Wii baseball for the first time...
…around New Year’s with my 11-year-old nephew. My arm was killing me for a day or so afterward because I insisted on doing the full windup and throw.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
You gotta do your stretches
And don’t forget the “warm down” after.
"Who's Bob Brenly? The guy that used to be the manager for Arizona?" ~ Alfonso Guilleard Soriano
and dont forget
the towel sessions
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
My arm hurt me
for a couple of days after playing the bowling game.
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
by tucsoncubsfan on Feb 2, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions
When they make these PTBNL deals...
I assume it’s from an agreed upon set of potential players. Anyone have an idea of who might be in that group?
I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Feb 2, 2009 10:42 AM CST reply actions
And
how do they decide which in the group it would be under what circumastances?
I never truly get how PTBNL is better from one team or another, to know the players and what not would be nice.
What to do, with Larry Hughe?
Player to be Named Later
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/wiki/index.php/MLB_Rules_and_Procedures#Player_to_be_Named_Later
In many trades, one or both of the teams may agree to send “a player to be named later”. A specific player must be agreed upon within six months of the initial trade; if this does not occur, the two teams may agree upon a cash amount to be sent instead. Often, the teams will agree to a list of players who can be used as the PTBNL; such an agreement would happen before the trade has been announced, and once the trade is final, the team receiving the PTBNL may take any of the players from the list within six months.
If a team receives a PTBNL, the player must not have been playing in the league to which he is being sent at the time of the trade (e.g. if the Red Sox receive a PTBNL, the player may not have been playing in the American League at the time of the trade). This rule was instituted after Harry Chiti was traded for himself in 1962 (he was traded from the Indians to the Mets for a PTBNL, which turned out to be himself). As a result, PTBNL’s are usually minor leaguers. Sometimes, teams will use players on the disabled list as players to be named so as to avoid having to get special permission from the commissioner’s office.
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
The key words in that post are...
… “may agree”, and “often”.
It doesn’t happen all the time. Sometimes, teams agree in advance on a list. Other times, it’s not decided till later. It’s up to the teams.
FWIW, the Chiti story is a myth. Chiti was sold from the Indians to the Mets, and then sold back a month later. There was no PTBNL involved.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
There was some spec
That the PTBNL would depend on Rich Hill’s performance (well, if rich makes the roster would be the first step).
I’d look for the Cubs to be targeting some low level arm that flashes some raw ability. There’s a whole host of possibilities so if I have time, I’ll try to run through them later, but that seems the Cubs MO on trades (looking for some raw arms).
fallen so far in a couple years
How so many of us thought he was a shoe-in for the ‘07 rotation after the team’s disastrous ’06 season. Now look.
Wonder what he and Pie would have returned 2 off-seasons ago.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
Or even ONE off-season ago.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
history is easy to
pick apart, but no one has a crystal ball
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
Won't stop the complainers
Hendry should have traded Rich Hill when his value was highest blah blah blah
/rabble
by dr stabbingworth on Feb 2, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions
And two years ago
they were saying Hendry should not trade this kid, he will be a great pitcher, he is a top prospect.
Wow, sounds like Vitters this off season. Lets hope he can produce and move up otherwise we will be having this same conversation all over again
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
Heck, Vitters hasn't even proven
he can hit at AA. Hill dominated the minors and showed flashes in the majors before 2007. In the second half of 2007, he looked like he was a long term solution in the rotation.
How about Rich Hill sounds like Dontrelle Willis
only we aren’t stuck with him because we gave him a big contract? This sort of thing happens to veterans and young players. Rich’s problem is a little more unusual, but it’s really hard to be effective at this level of baseball for one season, let alone several season.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
Yup...
I was all for giving Pie and Hill a chance a couple years ago. But if they – along with another kid or two – would return a player that really made a difference, I would still have gone for it.
I was the same way with B.Hill & Choi and I’ll be the same way again for Vitters.
The only move Hendry has made the last few seasons of dumping kids for a veteran that sucked from day #1 was the Pierre trade.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
Alex Rodriguez? Cole Hamels? Dustin Pedroia?
Kidding.
But seriously, if I am rooting for any player / player(s) not on the Cubs next season it would definitely be Rich Hill and Felix Pie. I wish them luck and I hope they find success. Sure I’d be a little disappointed but a change of scenery was necessary.
"It's hard to win 97 games, it's hard to win the division. Our attitude is if you get in every year, you get in most of the time, sooner or later you are going to knock that door down." -- Jim Hendry
So - who gets the open roster spot?
A four corners guy? Another middle IF option? Or no candidate for the 25-man?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
Just because it hasn't been mentioned...
There will be a cage match between Roberts and Peavy, with the survivor securing the spot on the 40 man.
I would think it has to be someone who can backup 3B
Maybe Aurilia or someone that hasn’t been mentioned.
Question about the 25-man roster:
Has Hendry indicated whether the Cubs will carry 11 pitchers or 12?
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
He said "you gotta have 12"
I think it was in Shanghai Badger’s convention report.
"Who's Bob Brenly? The guy that used to be the manager for Arizona?" ~ Alfonso Guilleard Soriano
Ah, OK. Thought so. Thanks. Haven't read that one yet.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
Need 'em
Got to have ’em.
Doesn’t matter if they ever pitch or not . . . .
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Feb 2, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions
Ridiculous.
I’d rather they drop a pitcher (package Vizcainio and Wuertz?) and pick up Aurilla or Cintron or someone who can back up 3B and SS.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
I would have probed this further
But after you read my post, you’ll see why I didn’t . . .
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Feb 2, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
Just read it and left a comment.
Yeah, Jimbo was in a surly mood alright. And I know this “12 pitchers” thing has been a sticking point with many Cubs fans for a while now, so maybe he’s taken some guff about it (and deservedly so) before.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
I see no openings on the 25-man...
…unless one of those “mandatory” 12 pitchers is dropped. See my post here.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
Maybe...
Terry Shumpert? Bring him back to back up Rami?
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." - Alvin Dark
Well, I'm glad to see he'll get a shot somewhere...
…because Lou probably would’ve put one of his grandkids on the mound before Rich Hill. And I don’t mean that as a slight to Lou – Rich has completely lost the plot and shown no signs of finding it.
To be honest, I’m relieved: Succeed or fail, he’s Baltimore’s problem now. Assuming he does make it back to the bigs, however, he’’ll have to deal with the AL East – a much tougher division.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
Agreed
I think Rich is a decent guy, but this is probably best for all involved.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Feb 2, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions
Baltimore is where Cubs go to die
sammy sosa
corey patteron
felix pie
rich hill
http://www.mysportsscoop.com
Also
Rocky Cherry, Luis Montanez and Jason Dubious, Jason was realeased and is back.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
Jason Dubious.
Exactly.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I have a question
Do the Orioles have to keep him on the 25 man roster? Or do the Orioles have options?
"You can't take life to seriously, you don't get out of it alive"
Rich has burned his options; or rather the Cubs burned Rich's options.
If Rich can’t get it together, then Baltimore will have to try and slip him through waivers, where he could be claimed by someone else.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
They Can Attempt To Send Him Down To The Minors...
… but he would have to clear waivers first. Something the Cubs didn’t want to do, cuz they knew that someone would claim him.
That would have been a bad thing?
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Feb 2, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions
Rich Hill?
Ball….ball….ball….ball
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
poor mechanics...
That dude pitches uphill both physically and mentally…just look at that picture! He’s fighting himself all the way to the plate. It was only a matter of time until his mechanics killed him. He’s a big curve high fastball type of pitcher. With those mechanics he’ll never really be able to consistently be low in the zone with his fastball. Also, he’s a huge sallynanny…
Y'know, that's a good point.
I always thought his windup was a little awkward and “pitching uphill” is a good (and rather appropos) way of putting it.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
Isn't the great Rothchild suppose to fix mechanics?
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
when will
“The Cub Can of Worms: Rich Hill” debut?
Rich Hill helped us get to the post-season two years ago
and did not hold the 2008 team back, so I’m not sure why he deserves that infamy.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
Well, he certainly doesn't deserve to be hated...
…but he was, ultimately, a pretty big disappointment for many of us.
We are a fever ... we are a fever ... we ain't born typical.
I have not hate for rich hill
just a big dissapointment from what the cubs thought he was going to be……..Just another big name prospect that hasn’t panned out. Thats why we shouldn’t always be opposed to trading our top prospects….we could have gotten a lot for rich hill just a year ago.
Oh yeah
He’s a big disappointment, but I’ll prefer to remember the good year he gave us.
The funny thing is – I don’t remember him in Roberts trade rumors so much as Bedard ones, and I think we’d have been nearly as disappointed had we gotten Bedard. Oh well.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Feb 2, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
Its a shame Rich flamed out
I hope he can find some sort of success in Baltimore, but looking at those AL East lineups I don’t think he will.
Let the Blaine Gabbert era begin.
Fare thee well, Richard.
You will always be a friend of the [cubs].
"It's hard to win 97 games, it's hard to win the division. Our attitude is if you get in every year, you get in most of the time, sooner or later you are going to knock that door down." -- Jim Hendry
I heard a rumor of Weurtz to the A's
So maybe another deal is coming.
by Sam Householder on Feb 2, 2009 12:32 PM CST reply actions
Yes, it'd be nice if Bruce came on and gave us more info
I believe you are referring to Levine’s report. It makes sense – we’re overloaded with righty arms and Wuertz has had control issues the last two years, along with the fact that we might get some savings in the move.
well
Richie Robnett and Justin Sellers for Wuertz. okay.
What are your thoughts on these two?
by dr stabbingworth on Feb 2, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
Posted it in the Wuertz thread, but real quick
Neither guy has huge value. Of the two, Sellers intrigues me more in terms of his fit for the organization. He is, by most accounts, a plus shortstop defensively. He has some offensive tools but hasn’t put together much. He does overswing at times.
A year ago, I would’ve had huge intrigue in Robnett. Big time toolsy guy. But he just hasn’t put it together, and in many ways, is similar to a guy we picked up in Brad Snyder.
Robnett is the guy that’ll get attention, but Sellers might prove more useful. I think, as of now, there’s a chance both start in AAA. Let me add, though, the betting money is that neither becomes much.
Player Tobenamedlater
This guy has been traded a ton in the past few years…
Erm, well if we are going to call Milton Bradley nicknames, mine is Fischer Price: yes, you heard it here first..
It really is Groundhog Day
Why doesn’t Baltimore trade for Dusty, Dick Pole and complete the transformation.
2008 Chicago Cubs: A busted pipe
The Baltimore Former Cubs
Hopefully the Cubbies get another Mike Fontenot as the PTBNL; the O’s had all but given up on Fontenot when they traded him for Sosa.

by
























