How To Fix The Baseball Steroid Mess
Rather than yet another post with the non-news that's trickling out of Cubs camp so far (hopefully, we'll get more once actual games start on Wednesday), I thought I'd weigh in with some thoughts on how the sport might actually begin to not only clean up the steroid mess, but make sure it doesn't happen again.

When have you ever seen
Bud Selig smile before?
Over the weekend, I came across several online articles that not only summarize the history of the problem succinctly, but place blame where it's needed -- not that blame is going to solve anything -- and suggest ways in which things might be cleaned up.
Arizona Republic columnist Dan Bickley (who used to write for the Sun-Times) posted this thoughtful column in which he writes that Bud Selig must take responsibility for what's happened on his watch, and quotes Selig:
"The idea that I said this wasn't my fault is nonsense," Selig said. "I'm the commissioner, and I accept everything that's happened. But every decade and every commissioner has had to face problems that affected the record book.
"We've had amphetamines, a very serious problem; we had cocaine issues in the '80s, and I know that from running my own club in Milwaukee; we've had the Pittsburgh drug trial, and we had four players go to jail. All of that, and they still couldn't get a drug test in baseball back then. Think about that."
Selig makes compelling arguments. He details how there are quotes from him regarding steroids dating to a 1995 story in the Los Angeles Times, well before the time Selig claims to have had an epiphany.
But here's the problem. He's the commissioner of Major League Baseball, a sport that has desecrated its holy grail (the record book), a sport in which many of the bigger stars (Bonds, Rodriguez, Sosa, Roger Clemens, Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmeiro, Andy Pettitte, Jason Giambi), have been exposed as cheaters. A couple of them might end up in jail.
Regardless of when Selig saw the light, this all happened on his watch. And that's why he made $18.3 million last year. While his owners/employers enjoy their new revenue streams and their glorious digital future, Selig must wear the flak jacket and take the arrows, from here to eternity.
That's the bottom line, I think. Selig claims he knew about this years or even decades ago, but his comments and Bickley's column indicate that he (and the rest of ownership) turned a blind eye because all the home runs were bringing people back to the game after the disastrous work stoppage of 1994-95. As I have written before, Selig's commissionership (I started to type "leadership", but that's not quite right, is it?) has made baseball's owners billions of dollars. (And not coincidentally, it has made the players multiple millions of dollars too, so they may be equally culpable. More on this later.) So, they have a vested interest in keeping things status quo, right?
Right, but it's not quite that simple. Biz of Baseball columnist Jordan Kobrits suggests some solutions, and they won't be pretty and they won't be easy to implement:
But if Selig wants to be known as something other than the steroids commissioner, he needs to focus on the future, rather than the past. It’s not too late, but he must act quickly, decisively and forcefully. If I were advising Selig, here’s what I would tell him to do.
Selig should hold a closed door meeting with the players on every team during spring training. The union conducts such meetings every spring and there’s no reason why Selig can’t do likewise.
In those meetings, Selig should tell the players that he believes that the overwhelming majority of them are clean, and yet a skeptical public suspects all of them are cheating because of the actions of a few. As commissioner, he intends to invoke the "best interests of baseball" clause in the Baseball Agreement and order unannounced, year-round drug testing to begin, say, 90 days after the beginning of the season.
He should further tell the players that the testing program will be conducted by an independent agency selected by them. The players are the ones being tested, and they should decide who they can entrust with their reputations. All players who test positive the first time will be suspended for the equivalent of one full season and will also forfeit their salary and benefits during the period of suspension. A second failure will result in permanent disbarment from the game.
Of course, the union will scream. But the union, led by executive director Donald Fehr and his sleazy sidekick, Gene Orza, long ago forfeited the high ground on the steroid issue. If a majority of players are clean, and I think they are, they should be allowed to tell the union what they want, rather than the other way around.
(Emphasis added by me in the last paragraph, and I happen to agree with the author's proposed penalties.)
To me, Fehr and Orza are just as culpable as Selig. Hiding behind legalities, technicalities and the cries of "violating privacy", they've protected the bad boys of baseball for too long. It's time for these two to step up, and as Kobritz wrote, take the cue from the leaders among MLBPA members, rather than simply dictate policy and have players follow in lockstep. I'm a member of a union myself (for those of you who don't know, I am a Directors Guild of America member and have been elected to serve on both local and regional councils) and to me, the best leaders of unions take direction from the members and lead in the way the members want to go, not the other way around.
Fehr and Orza have to wake up and see that the public -- the people who are responsible for ponying up the money that pays for their multimillionaire members' contracts, whether it be by ticket prices, souvenir purchases, or by buying the products of the advertisers who wind up financing the billion-dollar TV contracts -- isn't going to put up with MLBPA members cheating, then lying about it, all in the name of "I didn't think I could live up to my contract", or jealousy, or whatever other reasons, stated or not, for doing PED's.
Athletes getting an edge on other athletes? That's a time-honored way of competing, and I don't have an issue with it -- just be above-board about it and don't break the rules. (This doesn't mean I'm in favor of everyone doing PED's, either.) Let's level the playing field and bring professional sports to a fair competition level. Watching part of the Sandberg game yesterday on the MLB Network, I was struck by how much smaller the baseball players of 25 years ago looked than those of today do. Part of that may be better nutrition and better workouts.
But part of it isn't, and that's the part Selig, Fehr and Orza have to deal with. When the labor agreement of 2002 was finally signed, the union and management acknowledged that an adversary relationship in labor relations was hurting the game, and that working together was for the benefit of everyone -- and it did so, making untold billions of dollars for all involved in baseball over the last six years.
That can be true for the steroid issue as well. Get it done, so we can start talking about baseball again, instead of this.
Finally, if you were or are wondering about whether A-Rod was telling the truth of not during his press conference, here's an interesting take from a Ph.D. who is, according to the article, a "recognized authority on the role of emotions and body language through his extensive experience with Fortune 500 Companies".
0 recs |
73 comments
|
Comments
its tough to believe Arod was telling the truth
when he was reading from a script to get his story straight. give him some credit for admitting it though
churchofbaseball.com
by MJMars on Feb 23, 2009 8:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The point is, what did he really admit?
Do we know the whole truth yet? I wonder.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 8:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Give him credit?
He got CAUGHT, its not like he came out with it. Now he is trying to lie to cover up the truth behind his steroid use…
#34: You'll be missed!
by Chanman25 on Feb 23, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Others got caught
and have not admitted anything. There is no way he is being completely truthful, but he has said more than many
churchofbaseball.com
by MJMars on Feb 23, 2009 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True that he didn't take the Clemens or Bonds route
but if he continues to lie about the situation, its only going to put him in the same category..
#34: You'll be missed!
by Chanman25 on Feb 23, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Please.
Are things so bad that people who aren’t as sleazy and slimy as Bonds and Clemens should be praised and given credit? Rodriguez admitted what was already known(saying that he started a year or two before the testing is worthless in my book), and even his admittance was full of holes.
by dakoose on Feb 23, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MInimal Credit
at best. He has lied about his “facts” of the situation, I respect that he admitted and didnt go Clemens/Bonds about it, but he still lied which has come out after the most recent interview.
The Union is telling the players to not talk about it, be careful fielding any questions, etc. So the players are being told to bold face lie or disregard the situation, not a good thing IMO.
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 23, 2009 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unilaterally imposing testing over the objections of the union?
And the union just caving?
Here are some things MORE likely to happen than that:
- Time travel will be invented and Hank Aaron will go back in time and break Bonds’ legs.
- Lord Hiron from the Planet Zambawoobie will invade and use his death rays to wipe out every single steroid known to man
- Neifi Perez will come out of retirement (or wherever the hell he is) and hit 81 homers and pass twice daily drug tests while doing so.
Al, all due respect, it may be time to place MORE blame on the players than on the union leaders. Men like Tom Glavine have long been part of the union leadership and they blather on about how they want to keep the integrity of the game.
Tom Glavine had his chance. I don’t want to hear from him now. He didn’t say anything when his salary was going up due to increased revenues.
I think the number of players who are outraged over being painted with this steroid brush are far overrated. Their salaries were pulled up when McGwire, Sosa, Bonds and A-Rod got their deal.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 8:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's another problem.
You’re right that the players haven’t stood up to their union leaders. They need to.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a little harsh...
Lord Hiron really has no reason to visit Earth when the beaches and liquor are better on Zambawoobie. If he came, it’d be purely for recreation.
by CubFan81 on Feb 23, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Have you been there during tourist season?
He’s better off working somewhere else for two weeks.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Feb 23, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Zambawoobian women
Are kind of frigid as well.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1984: Willie McGee
Willie McGee looks very thin compared to current players in that Sandberg game hitting for the cycle. Who is that thin in today’s game? He was the NL MVP in 1985.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 23, 2009 8:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thats pushing a little bit.
Weightlifting and conditioning have become increasingly prevalent in recent years. It doesn’t take much effort for professional athletes to get a solid build and/or thicken up a bit.
by dakoose on Feb 23, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Athletes build
Also there was a big change in what was expected of players from 84-85 to 2008. While some players have definitely been using PEDS to get bigger there was also movement towards people who more like softball players where their biggest skill set was slugging whereas in the 80’s there was a bigger emphasis on all the skills of the game.
by KyCubsFan on Feb 23, 2009 4:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Selig isnt a dictator
He cant just lay down laws and expect players to acquiesce, every move he makes has to be agreed upon by the Union, so they share just as much blame.
The players do have a right to privacy, the union and its policies/stances are there to protect all its members, and if some less than moral members of that are able to use those rules to their benefit, well thats the price you pay for equal protection. The clean players should hold their Union reps accountable, make a fuss so their voices are heard.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Feb 23, 2009 8:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly what the article is saying...
… and so am I.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotcha
Thats why I pay little to not attention to all the faux-rage stemming from the latest revelations. The Blame Game accomplishes very little.
The worst part is that the other sports are going unscathed on this issue, especially when you have punters and guys who ride bicycles for living doing the same drugs.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Feb 23, 2009 9:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think there are two reason why the steroid story is such a story
1) Baseball is and always will be America’s national passtime. Americans care about baseball for the sport itself and the integrity of it. I know that football might garner more of the attention, but that’s because it can be packaged much more effectively and because gambling is a major component of it not because people care about it more.
2) The owners, Selig, and players still have not publically accepted blame for thier responsilibilty in this mess, though I would say that the playres have accepted much more than the either two.
I’m glad that these articles have been written. Maybe they’ll do some good.
by jerry morales rules on Feb 23, 2009 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bud Selig and Donald Fehr are most culpable
They have sat there and done nothing when they each have known damned full well the magnitude of this problem. Selig is as terrible a Commissioner as Boobie Kuhn. Fehr will protect his players until the death, which I suppose is what a union leader should do. But don’t anybody buy into this bullshit coming out of Bud Selig’s lying mouth. He’s paid $17 million a year and he is “powerless” to fight performance enhancing drugs in the sport he has had participation in since the early 1960’s? Selig is the biggest slime in professional sports.
by BLou on Feb 23, 2009 9:17 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Steriods come....on they have been around since 1971, no 1954, no 1936
The NY Times did an article in December 1991 about how the East German’s were systematically using steriods since 1971.
The stunning domination of international swimming by East German women for nearly two decades was built upon an organized system of anabolic-steroid use, a group of 20 former East German coaches confirmed yesterday.
Their admission, provided to reporters in Bonn, is the latest evidence — and some of the most convincing — that senior sports administrators of the now-dissolved Communist state made performance-enhancing drugs a critical part of the training programs for the country’s elite athletes.
“We confirm that anabolic steroids were used in former East German swimming,” the coaches said in a signed statement. “Not all of us were involved in doping. The extent varied.” A Golden Period
Now of course the East Germans didn’t just come out of the blue—-or Red as of course the Soviets were at the heart of the beginning of the “roid age” where again it goes back to 1954 and the Soviet’s Weight Lifting Team. As the story is told; the US team physician opnely questioned the Soviet’s team´s doctor afterward, and the soviet doctor admitted that his team had been receiving testosterone injections—-the the first time anyone had ever ’admitted that steroids were used to enhance athletic performances.
But then there are unconfirmed sources that testosterone oral preparations were used by Germany´s Olympic team in 1936 for the Berlin Olympics, this rudimentary effort did little but back to the Soviets, however, rumors of discarded syringes in their dressing rooms made it clear that they were not using oral steroids anymore.
By the 1990´s, Anabolic Steroids had been introduced into the US athletic society, and their use had penetrated every possible sport including the professional ranks but also down to the High-Schools. But if you recall even back to 1987 the National Football League introduced it´s anti-steroid policy, and Major League Baseball was left as the most major sports organization in the world which still had no such policy. That is 22 years ago!
Let us look at a 1990 survey of of 2113 high school students where 94 (4.4) admitted using anabolic steroids. and by gender, we find that (6.5) of 1028 males and (2.5) of the 1085 surveyed females were already users of steroids. were athletes 5.5 used of steroids compared to non-athletes (2.4%)…YOU DON’T THINK THERE WAS A PROBLEM ALREADY! By 2003 these numbers as studied by the Center of Disease Control had doubled!
The first official hint in MLB was a eyeballed bottle of a nutritional supplement seen in Mark McGwire´s locker. The bottle contained Androstendione, a prohormone, or a compound which can convert into another one inside the body. At the time time, McGwire was en route to breaking Maris’s single season home-run record. MGwire retired shortly after breaking that record.

Then in 2002 Ken Caminiti revealed to Sports Illustrated that he used anabolic steroids, and that he estimated roughly fifty percent of the players in the league were using them also. This admission opened the floodgates where then Jose Canseco’s book published during the height of the steroids in baseball stated that , 85% of all players in MLB used steroids, where he admitted using them.
So who is kidding who? When you mention the following:
But here’s the problem. He’s the commissioner of Major League Baseball, a sport that has desecrated its holy grail (the record book), a sport in which many of the bigger stars (Bonds, Rodriguez, Sosa, Roger Clemens, Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmeiro, Andy Pettitte, Jason Giambi), have been exposed as cheaters.
all I see are this era’s All Stars who grew up in the 1980’s and 1990’s when steriods were already vogue in High School. Now here is a tidbit. Cheating became systemic, cheating in college basketball where recruiting became a real industry, cheating in football by spying on other teams practices is the next big deal with surveillance electronics…that is why pro teams have built their own indoor practice facilities….cheating in baseball was beefing up the players…..basketball and football players got bigger….so did golfers…no matter what a 300 lb lineman was unusual even in 1985 but now it is normal, even small.
So who is kidding who….
Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."
by Ivy Walls on Feb 23, 2009 9:32 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
the 1970's Steelers
had players admit to using Steroids. And that is not including Lyle Alzado and the Raiders.
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 23, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Courson and Mike Webster
They both admitted to using steroids. Neither one of them is alive today. Courson has his heart weakened by steroids. Webster didn’t think his health problems were because of steroid use.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 23, 2009 1:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MONEY = DRUGS= PROFESSIONAL SPORTS
Maybe baseball will get this mess turned around someday . But for now we will deal with this problem for many seasons . Very hard to explain to Little League age kids who have questions about this topic . Lets hope baseball can clean this up real fast …..
by cubs north on Feb 23, 2009 9:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is the reason steroids need to be banned.
Kids emulate their sports heroes, whether that’s a good thing or not. If steroid-enhanced major leaguers succeed, kids are going to want to do it, too.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To play devil's advocate for a second
There ARE some major privacy issues out there. Just because Fehr and Orza have little to no credibility left doesn’t mean there aren’t valid concerns.
1) False positives are a reality. There should be a liberal appeal process.
2) The players need some real guarantees that steroids, HGH, etc… are the only things being tested for. Players DO have the right to keep certain medical information private if they choose.
3) Any team executive, manager,etc., who leaks the info before it is appropriately released — if it is to be relased at all — should receive the EXACT same penalty as the players who test positive — 1st offense, one year; 2nd offense, permanent ban.
4) Any and all contracts containing incentive clauses attached to numbers — games played; at-bats; homers, etc… will be null and void and renegotiated if the sides wish. Players on PEDs made a lot of money and won a lot of games for owners. They should not be held to standards established when they were using.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 9:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good point about false positives.
Maybe they need double and triple testing for positive tests.
And, the leaks have to stop. There needs to be a specific mechanism for revealing positive tests, and you’re right, anyone violating it should be subject to severe penalties.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Personal statistical achievement is the magic of baseball
Baseball is unique in that statistical accomplishment holds reverent and magical appeal to fans. It’s unlike football, basketball or hockey in this regard and it is one of the great appeals of baseball. Ted Williams hitting .406, Babe Ruth banging out 714 home runs, Greg Maddux winning over 350 games, etc…
What has happened during the steriod era is a total disregard to the sanctity and magic of baseball. The gatekeepers of baseball have allowed the record book to be desecrated. It is inexcusable. Baseball is becoming a cesspool. And it is getting to the point that baseball may never be fixed.
I can’t look at the all-time statistics in baseball anymore without crying. It absolutely sucks. Clemens, A-Rod, Bonds, Sosa, McGwire and all the rest need to be permanently banished from baseball and their statistical accomplishments wiped off the face of the earth. But we all know that won’t happen.
by BLou on Feb 23, 2009 9:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Oh get over it
There is no CRYING in baseball.
There are plenty of reasons to get rid of steroids before you get to numbers in a book:
- Health. I already fear that we’ll have a mass epidemic of players dying early. That should be stopped.
- Fairness. No 22-year-old AAA player should be forced to wait while a 37-year-old has-been uses steroids to keep his roster spot.
- Equality. MVP’s; All-Star appearances; Batting titles and championships all come with financial gains.
- Legality. Not for nothing, but they are illegal.
It’s shrill hyperbole like this, crying over records set by men who didn’t play blacks, broken by men on amphetamines and re-broken by men on steroids, that will prevent real change.
The more you scream, the more it’s easier to tune you out as a goofy purist who is still pissed off over the introduction of the divisional playoffs, much less the wild card.
And stop crying.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not crying
You take away their records and you remove one of the reasons they cheat. If they know there will be no record of them in the game it will make them think twice. If a player gets caught cheating (roids, corked bat, etc…) that year gets wiped off the books and noted as to why. A second time and their name gets wiped from everything. “Cheaters never win” has to rule the day.
by goddess on Feb 23, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, you can't "take away" a record.
The numbers are what they are. Home runs were hit, runs were scored, games were won. You can’t erase those without changing the history of many baseball seasons.
Those of us who will view these numbers in the future will know which ones were tainted.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Compunding the Home Run Issue
Is the fact that the ball parks are so much smaller now than they were in the Golden Days. Home runs are much cheaper now, and I think that sucks. Has anyone actually addressed that issue, or have I missed it?
by NWIowaCubFan on Feb 23, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Compounding
Sorry for the typo. People say home runs add excitement to the game. I say, give me a park that’s 400 feet to the poles, 470 to straightaway center, and scream like a banshee when someone smashes one into the left-center gap and everyone on the field is running for their lives. Woo hoo!
by NWIowaCubFan on Feb 23, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Al,
I was meaning to post a fan shot to a link I just found, but put it in the fan posts by mistake. is this ok or does it need to be moved? Sorry for the mistake
by nmcubsfan on Feb 23, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Was that the A-Rod thing?
It seems to be working there OK. Keep in mind, you can delete your own FanPosts.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 23, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine, Goddess
Let’s start with 1998.
Cubs made the wild card that year in a one-game playoff. Without looking, I feel safe in saying that Sosa had at least two game-winning hits.
In other words, taking away Sosa takes away the Cubs playoffs.
Let’s start with the financial:
- Cubs go through the books, find out how much they made in tickets, concessions and parking for that one game at Wrigley and they give it to the Giants
- Every player, coach or employee who got a playoff share should pay their counterpart at the Giants with interest compounded from 1998.
- Fans who have a valid ticket stub for the game will be eligible for a refund.
Now, let’s move to the records
- Sosa’s season is wiped out. That in turn means he scored no runs, which further in turn means no teammate gets credit with an RBI for knocking him in. No opposing pitcher gets charged with walking him. Any appropriate bonuses are either paid out or refunded.
- Sosa’s MVP award moves to McGwire and then in turn moves to Alou. Any bonus is paid.
Tired yet?
Good, think next time.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well devil's advocate
I have a wreckless driving charge that was dropped in court. Although I actually did do the event, it has been wiped clean of the recordbook. Same principle?
#34: You'll be missed!
by Chanman25 on Feb 23, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hope It Was "W"reckless Driving
I hope your “reckless” driving was “wreckless” driving.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 23, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah driving fast like hell that you are unable to cause a wreck
its like mind bottling, you get the idea..
#34: You'll be missed!
by Chanman25 on Feb 23, 2009 8:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Plenty of blame all around
Who knows where this all started, the Bash Brothers? Who knows, however once it became a culture the union and Bud needed to step up and put some teeth in a policy. And we know that never happened and we are left with more roid stories then actual baseball stories.
I would collectively put this on the players/union and Bud. However Bud needed to be more forceful have some balls and go after this issue, but he failed. He caved to the strength of Fehr and the union, just like the players caved and turned there face when other players had a needle sticking out of there backside.
I don’t want to here Bud whine about the diffuclty he had dealing with the union. This is your freaking job Bud, that is why they over pay you by 15 million get the shit done.
Some of the players finally are getting it right, Oritz and manager Ozzie, give a one year suspension, that has some guts into the policy. However to continue as is, the crap won’t go away.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Feb 23, 2009 9:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You can blame fans, players, Union, owners, Selig
none of the above are innocent, but the vast majority has to be on the players, they know who in their locker room are using, or are the ones using.
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 23, 2009 10:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is all about Bud
for better or worse, he oversaw this whole mess..
Until he goes it wont be over… It wasn’t over when Mark McGwire left or Bonds, or Clemans…
The new face of baseball will start at the top… Bud must go, for baseball to put the steriod era to rest
LouPrules
by LouPrules on Feb 23, 2009 11:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
bud
Bud can go but it is not all about bud see Cubbie-Tim’s point above. If those who were clean stood up faster, longer and louder then it would have been different.
I personally blame Bush we was owner of the Rangers long before he was president of the country.
by KyCubsFan on Feb 23, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This statement:
“Fehr and Orza have to wake up and see that the public — the people who are responsible for ponying up the money that pays for their multimillionaire members’ contracts, whether it be by ticket prices, souvenir purchases, or by buying the products of the advertisers who wind up financing the billion-dollar TV contracts — isn’t going to put up with MLBPA members cheating, then lying about it, all in the name of "I didn’t think I could live up to my contract”, or jealousy, or whatever other reasons, stated or not, for doing PED’s."
How are we going to put up with the MLBPA members cheating?? People still are going to the games, buying merchandise, etc. The only way to fix the solution is to stop going to games and buying products
#34: You'll be missed!
by Chanman25 on Feb 23, 2009 12:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That link is very interesting
It’s not just that he’s lying. It’s that he doesn’t care. He’s dismissive. Even now, fine, you got him, but at the end of the day what is it to him? Nothing. He knows that all he’ll have to do is withstand some booing and give some quick “apologies” and nothing that actually affects his money or tenure with the team will happen. It’s that attitude that turns me off.
by chitownhawkeye on Feb 23, 2009 12:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Arod Clemens and Bonds
Arod has openly admitted but not where he can be called in on perjury charges. They can’t do anything to you for lying on TV.
Bonds and Clemens have clammed up while testifying in congress or such and under current investigation.
BIG DIFFERENCE.
And does anyone really think Arod would have said anything if it wasn’t published?
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 23, 2009 1:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
New Baseball Era?
Who knows, if any legit steroid rules get enacted AND enforced, we could go back to the stats of the pre-divisional era…personally, I’d like to see Sam Crawford’s mark of 309 career triples challenged :-)
But of course, legit steroid rules actually being enforced is about like wishing for Wrigley to be rebuilt out of solid gold—it just ain’t gonna happen.
by Jaydee1978 on Feb 23, 2009 1:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
this is going to be an unpopular opinion, I can see
and it really burns to agree with Worf, even peripherally, but…
you’ll do a LOT better keeping steroids out of the hands of children by legalizing and regulating it.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Feb 23, 2009 1:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wait...
We’re still discussing steriods, right?
by N Oakley on Feb 23, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
although it works well for other things. :P
Look, we let football players inhale pure oxygen. THAT has a stimulative effect. Why is that ok and not this? Because there’s a rule that says so, that’s all.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Feb 23, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I ever said that...
Or maybe I did. Who knows?
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's peripheral
by legalizing it, you’d allow players to use it. Your position on this appears to be “everyone’s going to do it anyway, so why worry?”
Am I wrong on that?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Feb 23, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's fair
At the least… I’d rather have that than some kind of witchhunt.
I actually am OK with baseball’s current policy. 50 games is quite a bit.
My beef has always been with the mad obsession with the record books.
You mention oxygen up above. There’s an even better comparison.
Cortisone is a steroid. Without cortisone, Kirk Gibson strikes out on three pitches (or can’t even get up the steps) and the A’s likely win that World Series.
There’s just a rule saying it’s OK.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Feb 23, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There’s just a rule saying it’s OK.
And that’s exactly right. The rule says one steroid is ok, and another steroid isn’t, just like the law says one drug (alcohol) is ok and another (mary jane) isn’t.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Feb 23, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That being said
considering the long term health effects, legalizing steroids is a tremendously bad idea, just from a public health policy standpoint.
We have no idea what the long term effects of HGH or other newer generation PEDs will be.
by chitownhawkeye on Feb 23, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In actuality,
there are almost no legitimate studies out about the long term effect of steroid use. Sure, you can point to professional wrestler or bodybuilder and come to some type of conclusion, but almost no baseball player, or athlete in the four major sports takes nearly the amount of drugs that those guys take.
I’m not saying that I’ve read a ton of studies, but from what I’ve read about studies done it appears that steroids taken in moderation under a controlled environment with a sound post cycle program are not nearly as bad as played out to be. The most ardent anti-steroid people around, those in the government, have no idea what steroids even are. We all just hear about how bad they are and take it as truth.
by dakoose on Feb 23, 2009 6:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Additionaly, most steroid horror-stories
result from mis-use, with a large chunk stemming from proper post-cycle therapy.
by dakoose on Feb 23, 2009 6:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which doesn't change the fact that we don't know the effects
Legalizing them just for the purpose of having a target group to study is not really optimal.
I guess what I’m trying to say is the FDA has a hard enough time trying to regulate drugs designed to cure/treat/prevent disease that have had years of controlled clinical studies. Personnally, I wouldn’t want to open up the door to users, whether professional or armchair warriers, who want “better performace” only to find out down the road about serious long term medical effects.
by chitownhawkeye on Feb 24, 2009 8:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
cortisone not an anabolic steroid
All steroids are not created equally. Cortisone injections that reduce swelling can not give the same kind of benefit as muscle building anabolic steroids. It should also be noted that the side effects of Dr. supervised use of cortisone does not have the same kind of detrimental side effects that illegal use of anabolic steroids does. This is comparing apples to oranges.
by Acapulco Taco Pie on Feb 23, 2009 6:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Testing
Union picks a company. Baseball picks a company.
Each sample is divided and half sent to each company.
If both come back clean obviously not a problem/
If both come back poisitive obviously there is a problem.
If one comes back negative and one positive they have a third company in the wings and that determines what it is.
Obviously a second testing of the sample in a positive test always.
I used to work in HR for a company that did drug testing. Current employees always got the benefit of the doubt and it was retested.
Here’s scary. 15 or so percent of the positive tests came back negative on retest.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 23, 2009 1:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Should clarify
The original sample was retested.
Also they can do hair follicle tests as well which a lot of companies go to. I don’t know if steroids show up in your hair long after they’re out of your urine like cocaine and such does.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 23, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Idea
A good friend just started dating an employment lawyer. She’s not a baseball fan so is looking at this from purely a legal standpoint. She had some more to say and is going to summarize it for me and email me if people might be interested in me posting it.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 23, 2009 1:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Random observation
This has nothing to do with steroids but I found it kind of amazing.
US Cellular Field is now the 8th oldest ballpark now that the Yanks and Mets will open new facilities (Older parks are Cubs, Red Sox, Dodgers (hard to believe it’s 3rd isnt it), Royals, Twins, Mariners and Blue Jays) and it will be 7th when the Twins open their new park in 2010 so in 20 years its gone from #1 newest to #24th.
Also anyone else as baseball fans happy to see Griffey and Glavine going home so to speak to finsh their careers?
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 23, 2009 1:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Griffey and Glavine going home...
Giambi too- back to Oakland…
,,,now “happy” is another issue…
Go Green! Go White! GO STATE! (Now #12,966 on the Cubs season ticket waiting list- UP from 13,031...WHOO HOO!)
by Zeke on Feb 23, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Those testing positive for Steroids should be forced to join T.E.S.S.H.I.M.M.M.M.J.S.N.I.D.H.O.A.A
Which stands for "The economy sucks so hard it made me misplace my job so now I don’t have one Association of America"
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 23, 2009 4:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Selig may have advanced the game
for owners and their wallets, but truly set the sport back in both moral compass and keeping MLB as THE national sport. I think he’s an asshole.
Dan
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Feb 23, 2009 8:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
I think I must have missed something.
MLB steroid policy in 2002:
A first-time offense would only result in treatment for the player, and the player would not even be named.
This wasn’t very good, so before the 2005 season, this was MLB’s policy:
A first positive test resulted in a suspension of 10 games, a second positive test resulted in a suspension of 30 games, the third positive test resulted in a suspension of 60 games, the fourth positive test resulted in a suspension of one full year, and a fifth positive test resulted in a penalty at the commissioner’s discretion. Players were tested at least once per year, with the chance that several players could be tested many times per year.
Players were suspended for steroid use in 2005. Still, MLB made it tougher at the end of the year:
A first positive test would result in a 50-game suspension, a second positive test would result in a 100-game suspension, and a third positive test would result in a lifetime suspension from MLB.
There have been numerous players suspended under this policy (see Sergio Mitre, 50 day suspension just this year).
Why are you guys arguing about the union and players rights? Maybe the penalties should be steeper. But, the argument that the union/players have privacy has been lost a long time ago.
by roscoevillage on Feb 23, 2009 9:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wish
Five years ago or so Selig would have made a proposal similar to this to all players:
Admit now that you have taken steroids, and you will be free of all penalty other than some community service, talking to highs schools, colleges. etc. But if you are discovered later, there will be season long suspensions. This type of deal offers leineincy and harsh penalties. And sure the players coming clean would still probably be villified by the media and fans, which would prevent some (many?) from admitting usage, but at least some step is made in hopes of preventing this debacle from continuing for DECADES. Selig is so reactionary to everything it makes my skin nearly crawl.
Let’s not forget the teams, owners and GMs in all of this, either. I can’t recall a team or GM declairing they would clamp down on steroids, boycott past users, run the personal trainers out of clubhouses, etc.
And yet, I think we also need to remember that steroids aren’t all evil and bad. My wife received a shot of steroids when she whacked her head shutting the car’s back hutch and was left with a quarter sized bald spot on her noggin. My cat has also received steroid injections from the vet. All of the cat’s accomplishments are now tagged with an *. If steroids can help an injured player heal faster, I see no problems in that, if they are administered over a short period of time. But that opens a whole new can of worms that a simple, steroid-profiteering, reactionary Commish like Selig would be unable to pull off. It’s well past time for Bud to take his 18 million and just go home.
by BucknerKongCardenal on Feb 23, 2009 9:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're talking about two different kinds of steroids.
There are steroids that aid in healing, such as cortisone or the type your wife had.
We’re discussing anabolic steroids which are, generally, illegal to possess without a prescription and aren’t used simply for “injured players healing faster”.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 24, 2009 4:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's the thing
Fehr and Orza have to wake up and see that the public… isn’t going to put up with MLBPA members cheating, then lying about it, all in the name of “I didn’t think I could live up to my contract”, or jealousy, or whatever other reasons, stated or not, for doing PED’s.
They have, and they will continue to. The steroid scandal has done nothing to hurt baseball’s bottom line, and mostly consists of posturing by the same baseball columnists and sports talk show hosts who knew about he problem and failed to say anything at the time.
And why are we acting like the A-Rod incident is a sign that we haven’t been doing enough? The incident took place before testing was implemented. The Clemens incident took place before testing was implemented. Bonds? Before testing was implemented!
by Wreckard on Feb 23, 2009 10:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
LSAA
Big clap, whatever it takes on this site…
All of these posts/responses indicate that steroids are still legal in MLB — see my post above…
The ARod stuff is from 2003. Maybe(likely) he is lying about stuff that he took after that. But, in general, MLB has stopped widespread steroids use since 2005.
These arguments about union/players rights are way out of date.
by roscoevillage on Feb 23, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Players, Union leaders, Owners, Commissioner, etc...
… are all “to blame”. It isn’t one “leader” or one “player”. Selig does not make $18 million to police this crap—he makes it because as one of his critics seems to contradict himself (in claiming that he’s over paid) in pointing out that he has been at the helm of the greatest financial expansion of the game. The players did it to get paid and with the strength of their self interest they made a killing and they still live by the code of the cheat and they have contempt for the so called “rat” more than they do their own greed. Do I assume that the vast overwhelming majority of players used steroids—absolutely.
It’s amazing to me what people want to believe? Or maybe it isn’t or shouldn’t be amazing? Greed is a very strong motivating force, from the utility scrub trying to make the league minimum, to the “homeowner” who has no equity in their house and never had the ability to afford the loan but decided they had to get theirs, too…even if they didn’t understand what they were doing…(what a f’d up country!!!!! and we are surprised by the scope of cheating amongst a bunch of under educated over-represented millionaires)
If owners believe that they have the negotiating strength to impose a strict testing program with meaningful penalties for violation then they should do it. If not, then the sport is better off embracing steroids and promoting itself like professional wrestling—there’s probably more in it for everyone that way.
by DudeVf11 on Feb 23, 2009 10:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















