1977: The Year That Might Have Been
This time it's for real I know, I know it, baby, this time it's for real -- Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes
The song "This Time It's For Real" came out in the summer of '77 and those of us who watched the Cubs roar out to an unbelievable start could have been forgiven if we had adopted that as the team's theme song that year.
Consider the context: we hadn't quite gotten over the crushing disappointment of 1969 and the subsequent failures of our childhood heroes, including 1973 when, as in 1969, they raced out to an 8.5 game lead in June, only to collapse -- at one point in July and August going 5-27 -- and finish fifth. GM John Holland backed up the truck after 1973 and the '74 through '76 editions of the Cubs were pretenders, not contenders.
A former member of the late and unlamented College of Coaches, Bob Kennedy, had been hired as GM on November 24, 1976, and he immediately got busy remaking the franchise. He sent the popular Rick Monday to the Dodgers for the sore-kneed and sore-ankled Bill Buckner and a kid SS named Ivan DeJesus, shipped the underperforming Bill Bonham to the Reds for Woodie Fryman (OK, that one didn't work out so well), and in a controversial move, traded popular and productive third baseman Bill Madlock to the Giants for Bobby Murcer and Steve Ontiveros. (Ontiveros was an acceptable 3B, but his hitting was atrocious -- despite hitting .299 with 32 doubles and 81 walks in 1977, he scored only 54 runs.)
On the surface, the deal made no sense -- why would you ship a 25-year-old 3B who had won two batting titles for a 31-year-old outfielder? The purported reason was Madlock's salary demands. Then the Cubs gave Murcer more money than Madlock had supposedly been asking for. Without making any accusations, it was widely assumed at the time that Madlock wasn't the type of black player the Wrigleys liked... even though it was the 1970's, black players like Oscar Gamble, Bill North and Madlock had been shipped away for virtually nothing, even though they went on to have productive years elsewhere. It was the wrong thing to do from the standpoint of equal rights, and the wrong thing to do from a baseball standpoint, too.
And probably the key change in the 1977 team was new manager Herman Franks' decision to use reliever Bruce Sutter, in his first full major league season, only in games where the Cubs were leading in the late innings. He wasn't a closer in the modern sense, since he often threw more than one inning, but Franks was the first manager to use someone in this sort of role. And Sutter dazzled, until August, when the workload caught up with him and he missed three weeks.
The team got off to a mediocre start, standing 7-9 on April 30. And then they started winning, and winning, and winning some more. On May 17 they set a team record with seven homers and beat the Padres 23-6 at Wrigley Field. Eleven days later they beat the Pirates 6-3 to go into first place and, as they did on July 2, 1967 when the Cubs took over the top spot in the NL for the first time that late in the year since 1945, fans refused to leave until the Cubs flag on the scoreboard was moved to the top spot in the NL East.
They lost a pair at St. Louis to end May 28-16; that still made it a 21-7 month, one of the best in team history. June started off just as well as May -- there was a winning streak of six and another of eight, and the last of the eight-gamer was a 4-2, 10-inning win over the Expos in Montreal. The Cubs' record was 47-22 and their division lead was 8.5 games.
In those days not every road game was televised. That happened to be one that wasn't; those of us listening on WGN radio heard an exuberant Lou Boudreau say, "They can kiss the .500 mark goodbye!"
Oh, poor Lou. If he had only known what was to come.
But despite losing their last two games of June to finish the month at 47-24, that meant that the Cubs had gone 40-15 for the months of May and June. That still stands as the best 55-game stretch any Cubs team has had since 1945, when they had a 43-12 stretch at one point. Even during the great regular season the Cubs had in 2008, their best 55-game stretch was 37-18 (April 5-June 3).
July turned tough, but the Cubs still ended it two games ahead, with a 61-41 mark. On July 28, they played a game for the ages at Wrigley, erasing deficits of 6-0, 10-7 and 14-10 to win 16-15 in 13 innings, with Rick Reuschel, of all people, scoring the winning run as a pinch-runner.
It seemed at the time to be the kind of game that you'd remember forever when your team went on to postseason glory. Instead, it was the beginning of the end. The Cubs fell out of first place when they lost the first game of a DH to a bad Padres team on August 7, and a week later got swept in a four-game series by the eventual division champion Phillies, falling 6.5 games out in third place. On August 22, Bobby Murcer's 24th homer of the year helped seal a 3-2 win over the Giants, putting the Cubs briefly back in second place, 7.5 games behind. On that date, Murcer had 24 HR, 83 RBI and was hitting .280/.374/.492, seemingly on his way to his first 100-RBI season.
And then he almost literally stopped hitting. From August 23 through season's end he hit .216/.288/.328 with 3 HR and 6 RBI in 35 games. It wasn't the only reason the Cubs went 11-28 from then to the end, but it was a big one.
The home season ended on September 28 with a 5-2 loss to the Phillies in front of 5,116. The Phils had clinched the division at Wrigley the day before. And as for Lou Boudreau's proud boast on June 28? After winning the first game of that Philly series 11-7 on September 26 with a 20-hit barrage, including a too-little-too-late homer from Murcer, the Cubs stood 81-76.
They lost their last five games to finish exactly at .500.
There were good things that happened in 1977. Rick Reuschel won 20 games -- the only Cub pitcher to win 20 between Fergie Jenkins in 1971 and Greg Maddux in 1992. Bruce Sutter saved 31 games, tying what was then the team record, and had an amazing WHIP of 0.857. Two years later he saved 37 games, which stood as the club record until Randy Myers saved 53 in 1993.
But it wasn't enough, and it wasn't "for real". The Cubs edged around the margins of contention with much the same cast of characters in 1978 and 1979 before collapsing to a 98-loss year in 1980, and it would have been worse in 1981 if not for the strike. When Dallas Green came in the next year, he began the renaissance that led to the 1984 division title.
0 recs |
77 comments
|
Comments
1977, the year I became diehard Cub fan
With all due respect to the late Bobby Murcer, he sucked as a Cub. I will remember 1977 more for Rick Reuschel, Bruce Sutter, Bill Buckner, Manny Trillo, Larry Bittner.
by BLou on Feb 5, 2009 8:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Biittner.
I forgot to mention this game, where he came in to pitch to save the bullpen on a 100-degree day with the Cubs losing 11-2 in the first game of a DH.
He gave up three home runs and was warned for throwing at Del Unser’s head (it wasn’t intentional, he just couldn’t find the plate). He did wind up striking out three, too.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
regarding bobby murcer
I love that movie four brothers.
by Kchance on Feb 5, 2009 8:52 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
blast it, Al
you had to remind me of this year .. the year that I began to really BELIEVE since the 69 debacle.
I was a kid in 1969 and had the innocence of childhood that buoyed my newfound faith in the Cubs. In 1977, I was a teenaged buck who’d been half heartedly following the Cubs – having watched those great Cubs teams come up short and die the death of attrition by 73 and 74 .. with only a Burt Hooton and Milt Pappas moment now and then.
This was the team that made me think that THIS WAS THE YEAR .. for the first time .. THIS was it. And no one can ever tell me that the Reuschel brothers weren’t studs. They looked like overgrown 10 year olds but those boys could play the game better than few other pitchers could in the Cubs’ bullpens for years.
Dang, I’m young again .. Let’s hit Rocky’s Disco in Steger .. and boogy oogy oogy
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 5, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Can we find
a “Guess this Cub” picture of a guy in large collar polyester shirt and a big ’stache?
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana
by copes006 on Feb 5, 2009 9:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can't find the collar...
but how about these ’staches?


Kasey
See what old Cubs Scorecards looked like at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/scorecards.html
Also, see the Cubs 2009 schedule at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/sched2009.html
by kaseyi on Feb 5, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Reuschel wasn't nearly as good as his brother.
And you summed it up. That’s exactly how I felt in ’77. Well, until August, anyway.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true ... but he gave it a good run there for a while
How many other MLB teams had a duo of brothers in their rotation? ..
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 5, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Reuschel
…was horrible. And off the top of my head, Bob and Ken Forsch come to mind.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
by krummy12 on Feb 5, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
Allow me to correct myself, the Forsch’s weren’t on the same staff. I misread the comment. And Paul didn’t start a game in 1977 so they weren’t in the same rotation either.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
by krummy12 on Feb 5, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Reuschel was bad
His highest and best use was as a swingman out of the pen. And even then he wasn’t too good.
Big Daddy Rick Reuschel was awesome though. He’d take that mound, get into a hypnotic rhythm and mow down the opponent in just a pretty a fashion as Greg Maddux. Reuschel was a horse too. 250 innings was routine.
by BLou on Feb 5, 2009 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
didn't the Niekro's pitch together?
Erm, well if we are going to call Milton Bradley nicknames, mine is Fischer Price: yes, you heard it here first..
by Chanman25 on Feb 6, 2009 6:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
The Reuschels were the first brothers to throw a combined shutout, though.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 7:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yep, that's the memory I have about Paul ..
that was it .. I remember reading about that the next day in the paper .. missed the game.
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 6, 2009 7:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1977
I will always remember that team. Thanks for the posting…as I have said before on this site, the 1977 team was the first cubs team where I becanme a die hard fan. I went to like 5-6 games that year, got many autographs from players like Bonham, Swisher, Ray Burris, “Tarzan” Wallis. 2 of my favorites games that year were when Cubs/Mets (old Timers Game) the Cubscame back with 3 run in the ninth to win 5-4 and the Reds/Cubs when Rick Reuschel pitched a shutout 3-0. Great team.
by cubprofessor on Feb 5, 2009 9:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
By the way...
Al,I beleive Bill Bonham was traded AFTER the 1977 season. Woody Fryman did not join the Cubs until the 1978 season…also the Cubs got Bill Caudill in that deal.
by cubprofessor on Feb 5, 2009 9:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're right.
Misread the transaction list. In any case, it would have been a horrible trade had the Cubs not gotten Caudill.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bill Caudill, the Inspector
I’ll never forget we were standing next to the player parking lot as dorky high school kids one day. The players and coaches pull up in nice Cadillacs, Chevy Blazers, etc. Lynn McGlothen pulls up in a brand new Mercedes. Then the final car to pull in the lot is a old beat up Chevy Vega that is kicking out white smoke. Open the door and out pops Bill Caudill with a big smile for the fans. Too bad we got rid of him because he went on to do some good things in Seattle.
by BLou on Feb 5, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What a year.
That was also the year of the South Side Hit men, & talk around Chicago was serious about another cross-town series. It seemed when Sutter got hurt, right before the all-star game, that the team morale was gone. He had the most amazing single year I’ve ever seen from a closer that year. It remains his best year, even though he had better “save” years. I remember talking with my friends that this team was really over achieving, but with the one pitcher in baseball who just could not be hit, we could win it all despite some of our other shortcomings. The season DID peak on the old-timers game. I always wondered what they would have done had they kept Madlock that year. He would have made a huge difference.
"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields
by KedzieKid on Feb 5, 2009 9:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're right about Madlock.
Sutter was so successful that year because no one had seen that split-finger pitch before. Batters would stand at the plate stunned after they would swing at a pitch that looked down the middle, only to drop two feet at the last possible second.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Madlock
Unfortunately, the Wrigleys had a problem with outspoken and rebel like black players. Billy Williams and Fergie Jenkins were always fine because they towed the company line and behaved the way the Wrigleys thought the should.
by BLou on Feb 5, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
While that is a very harsh judgment...
… it happens to be true.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 1:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Royko
Royko had a column about how the Wrigleys really doomed the Cubs because of some of the attitudes they had and how it took a city like Chicago 6 years after Jackie Robinson to have their first african american player.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 5, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was
1 year old, dont recall much about the season lol
"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic
by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 5, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
They were still 2 games above .500 when I was born that year
That’s why I enjoy these flashback posts so much—keep em coming, though I know they are a lot of work
by TC Cubby on Feb 5, 2009 10:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
I was born Aug 6th that year. I went to my first game in August of 1980 at age 3. Game was called because of rain/darkness. They blew it the next day if I recal correctly. I have the game card framed next to the one from my son’s game this past September. I do love the flashbacks, it helps me relate to the pain my Dad’s been living through all these years.
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand. - Homer J Simpson
by MikeOxbyg on Feb 5, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When they traded Madlock
I told my brother I will never buy Wrigley gum again. I was really mad then and to this day I still have not bought Wrigley gum.
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
by tucsoncubsfan on Feb 5, 2009 10:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That mystery pic is Bobby Murcer!
Ding. Ding. Ding.
What do I win???
by Ghost of Fred Merkle on Feb 5, 2009 10:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Little Blue Machine
as the Tribune dubbed them.
Like so many others here, 1977 was my first real experience with Cub heartbreak. I’d been a diehard since 1971, but this was the first (seemingly) really good Cub team in my lifetime.
Still, I’m left with several great memories. Foremost was probably watching Bruce Sutter suddenly become the most unhittable reliever in the game. I still remember the excitement in Jack Brickhouse’s voice as he’d describe Sutter’s splitter as “rolling off the table” as he racked up another strikeout.
If memory serves, I think he missed almost six weeks (and appearing in his first all-star game) due to his heavy workload. The Cubs clearly weren’t the same team without him.
by bluekoolaide on Feb 5, 2009 11:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
hearing about the Cubs in the '70s is weird
I was born in 1980, and I just barely remember the 1989 team. I grew up watching the Cubs on WGN for most of the ‘90s, and the stories of the ’69 team’s collapse were mentioned often.
But, until a few years ago, I had no idea that the Cubs had competitive teams in the ’70s. I assumed for years that after the nucleus of the ’69 team was broken up in the early ’70s, that the Cubs just kind of sucked until ’84.
by elgato on Feb 5, 2009 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well, that's not too far off really
The 1977 team was more of an abberation (and even they completely fell apart over the last two months of the season).
Most of my memories of Cubs team of the 70’s and early 80’s was that you basically knew they didn’t have a chance of beating out the Phillies or Pirates and so we tended to get excited by individual accomplishments like Madlock’s batting titles.
by bluekoolaide on Feb 5, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto
Born in ’79 and only knew of ’69 team until a few years ago.
After reading this great book:
My long-term perspective changed and now I can certainly empathize with the pain many of you experienced in the earlier years
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Feb 6, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That book is indeed excellent.
Whenever the BCB Free Agent Frenzy is finished (there are still plenty of unsigned free agents on the list), this book will be the prize.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 8:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
welcome to the Cubs Nation
Remember well the words of the Cubs fan who when asked by his dentist if he needed another shot for his root canal cheerily told him to proceed: “I’m a Cubs fan. I have a very high tolerance to pain.”
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 6, 2009 8:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
meh - '77 was a pretty lame year
…except ’77 was the year hell froze over:
Wednesday 19: Snow falls in Miami, Florida. This is the only time in the history of the city that this occurs.
"Just win tonight" - derv
by derv on Feb 5, 2009 11:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
1977
For another internet group I belong to I wrote an essay about how while I can remember Cubs stuff starting when I was 4, 1977 is the year when this girl fell in love with the Cubs and baseball. (I turned 9 that summer).
I remember them needing a police escort when they came home from a road trip at Ohare.
I remember going to the Park Ridge Metra station where Sutter was appearing and something like 1200 people showed up.
And I also developed my first famous person crush on Bill Buckner who was my favorite player until he was traded and is still in my top 5 faves all time (FTR the other 4 are Sandberg, Sutcliffe, Dawson and Wood).
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 5, 2009 11:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Also
Also 1977 was a very rare year where the Cubs and Sox both were in contention at the same time.
It was a completely wild summer in Chicago.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 5, 2009 11:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
ugh .. I didn't want to have to remember that ..
it was not a happy time for our Cubs and Sux-split Mexican clan ..
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 5, 2009 9:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And at the finish...
Sox 90-72, 3rd place
Cubs 81-81, 4th place
by DrCrawdad on Feb 6, 2009 10:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for that trip down memory lane
I turned 12 the summer of ‘77. This was one of my all-time favorite Cubs teams. You didn’t even mention Jose playing in the infield in that wild game against the Reds. That was one of the few games I got to watch that year … my family moved to Indiana and for the first time I couldn’t watch the Cubs on Channel 9 (and couldn’t until 1984, when cable finally came to Indianapolis). Fortunately, the Reds were televised a few times a year and that was one of the games. At that time, I thought “great, the Cubs finally win something and I can’t watch the games.” Anyway, what a great year …. I can still name all the players and know most of the stats …. Buckner .284 11HRs, Biitner, .299 12HRs. Mitterwald, .238. Burris 4.75 era. Willie Hernandez 3.03 era, the recently deceased Dave Roberts was on that team, Morales, Trillo and Sutter in the all-star game …. I could go on and on and be even more boring …. just wanted to say “thanks Al.”
In your next post, can you recap the highlights of the career of Carlos (not Sixto) Lezcano?
"We gotta circle the bandwagons." - Devin Hester
by Jose's Eyelid on Feb 5, 2009 12:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
When the Cubs beat the Pirates
…the TV camera showed everyone in the crowd holding up their index fingers for “We’re in first place!!!”
As a 10-year-old that summer, with a 13-year-old brother who was a HUGE fan (and two parents who were fans as well), I was in heaven. It seemed that the Cubs won every day.
by jdb-44 on Feb 5, 2009 12:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Year I Was Born.
First of all, let me say, as Harry would, “Hello again, everybody!”
I think it’s been about six months since I last posted on BCB, because the last couple of months of the season I was so excited I did not have the will to sit still in front of the computer for very long. (How could I be so stupid?) And as for post-October 4th, well, you know. I was in mourning until the Cubs Convention a couple of weeks ago, but now I’m ready to go again. There still has not been a single day since October 4th that the Cubs have not entered my mind (we could be under nuclear attack, and I would still be thinking about the Cubs) but I could not sit down and participate in any BCB discussions. It was just too painful after the playoff debacle. But mourning time is over, the black arm band comes off today, because we’re about a week away from the start of ST.
Now, back to business. As I said, had I been around to witness seasons like 1969 and the subsequent failures with that group, 1977 and subsequent teases with that group, and then witnessing 1980-1983, I would think the only word that could describe life as a Cubs fan would be “hopelessness”. I know that in late ‘70s, the Wrigleys were still doing business like it was the late ’30s, so basically the Cubs had no chance. Not that modern fans are spoiled by any means, but it’s safe to say that anyone who became a Cubs fan during the major drought (1946-1983) and stuck with it all those years, you don’t have to prove your loyalty to anyone. I know that between 1985 and 2002 there was a lot of bad baseball, but we had at least a few bright spots.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
by ctcoff99 on Feb 5, 2009 12:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
1977 1st Half Vs. 2nd Half
The Cubs were 51-30 in the first 81 games of 1977. The Cubs haven’t had a better “half season” since then. The Cubs were 50-30 in the last 80 regular season games of 1984. One game was rained out. They posted a 50-31 in the last 81 regular season games of 1989. Of course, in the second half of 1977, the Cubs went 30-51.
The only team in recent history that I know of that fell off nearly that much between the first half and second half was the 2005 Washington Nationals. They went 50-31 in the first half, only to finish up 31-50 in the second half. Ironically enough, the 2005 Nats finished at 81-81 just like the 1977 Cubs did.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 5, 2009 1:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The 2008 Cubs were 49-32 in the first half.
That’s pretty close.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Another fond memory of that season
That 23-6 game was very important in my family history.
That day my mom and me and my older brother went to the game with the man she was dating the first time we met him and it was the man who would become my stepfather.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 5, 2009 1:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Holly crap, Herman turned 95 last month!
Herman was a real estate magnate and could FLIP flop the batting order with the best of them.
by Employee22 on Feb 5, 2009 2:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I added the 77 to my screen name
in honor of that team.
The Madlock trade was forced because Madlock was “playing out his option” in 1977. The Reserve clause was still in the contracts, but the Seitz decision meant that contracts were only renewable for one season, not in perpetuity as the owners had been interpreting the clause. So Madlock was going to be a free agent at the end of the season if his demands weren’t met. PK Wrigley hated free agency and hated ungrateful employees of any color (although he did seem to give white players the benefit of the doubt a lot more than black players—although Phil Cavaretta might remember differently in the 1950s.) So the decision was made to trade Madlock and they got Bobby Murcer, whom the Cubs no doubt remembered from ten years earlier when he was supposed to be the next Mickey Mantle. The problem was that either the Cubs didn’t realize that Murcer was also playing out his option or that they figured the good white kid from Oklahoma would be more reasonable in his demands than Madlock was. He wasn’t, he asked for more than Madlock was asking for and because of the trade, he had Cub management over a barrel. Unlike Madlock though, he wasn’t worth it.
PK Wrigley died in April of 1977, and it was like a curse had been lifted from the team. All of a sudden, guys were playing the best ball of their careers. Reuschel and Sutter were the stars of that team, but Jerry Morales played out of his mind for a while to, until he got hurt in the All-Star game.
I’m surprised you didn’t mention this game which looks like an unremarkable 5-2 Cubs win in July, but it was actually the suspended game during the NYC Blackout. I was watching that game on TV when the power went out. Not at my house, of course, but the power for the broadcast. I also remember that all the network TV signals in those days went through NY, so TV in Wisconsin was pretty much out except for some local public access stuff on cable.
1977 has gotten a lot of attention lately with “The Bronx is Burning” and “Summer of Sam” as well as the kiddies today all being into the early punk/new-wave music (and a lot of today’s popular artists heavily influenced by that period.) Most of the stuff is centered in NYC (which was on the brink of collapse) but it’s good to remember that the Cubs had a magical summer that turned into a horrible fall that year too.
by Josh77 on Feb 5, 2009 2:25 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Wrigley
P.K. Wrigley, IMHO (and this is based only on what I have read about him), was a guy who had no business in the game in the first place, and by about 1950, the game had completely passed him by. Unlike his father, who was a true sportsman, loved the Cubs, and genuinely wanted to win, P.K. was kind of an egghead who inherited his father’s business gene, but got passed over in the sports department. While the Yankees, Cardinals and Dodgers became the model of how a professional baseball organization should be run pre-free agency with their farm systems, P.K. was hiring “athletic directors”, not embracing night baseball, refusing to develop of farm system, instituting the College of Coaches system, trading any player whose salary demands were too high, and expecting every black player to be just like Ernie Banks in both performance and personality. Honestly, the only good things he ever did as owner that I can find in my readings were expanding radio and television coverage (he was a pioneer in this area), and hiring Leo Durocher. I’m sure there were other good things he did, it’s just that I’m not aware of any. Was he a good man? According to Ernie, Billy, Ronnie, and others who speak reverently about him, he was. Personally, I have no idea. He died just before I was born. I do know that he had no business owning a baseball team, and that the organization’s post-1945 collapse, for the most part, is his legacy as the owner of the Chicago Cubs.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
by ctcoff99 on Feb 5, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's a good summary of P. K. Wrigley.
He probably should have sold the team in the late 40’s or early 50’s when they started sucking, but I think he had promised his father on his deathbed that he wouldn’t.
Also, he left the team in his will to his wife instead of his son. When P. K.’s wife died shortly after he did, they faced a huge estate tax bill, which is why they finally did sell.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Deathbed legend
appears to be just that, a legend. It’s something he claimed in the 1960s when people were wondering why he still owned the team. But Stout’s book points out that William Wrigley was pretty much unconscious the entire time from his heart attack to his eventual death. But it is clear that PK considered the Cubs and Wrigley Field, in particular, as a shrine to his father and wasn’t going to sell it.
PK was an odd man. He had many friendly acquaintances but no friends. He was loyal to employees to a fault and often hired people because they needed a job and were down on their luck. On the other hand, he’d turn viciously upon anyone he thought was ungrateful.
He hardly ever went to a game. Yet he expected a daily telegram (or later, phone call) explaining to him how the team did that day. He followed the Cubs closely from afar, which is how he liked it.
He was a brilliant salesman: he managed to convince the US Government in WWII that chewing gum was an industry vital to the war effort. He managed to convince millions of us to cheer for a lousy ballclub. But as a businessman, maybe not so much. He died with an estate of $81 million, which isn’t so good considering that he inherited $24 million 45 years earlier and was running a business through some of the most prosperous times in American history (after the Depression, of course.)
PK Wrigley was a Sphinx.
by Josh77 on Feb 5, 2009 5:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for this Al
1977 is the reason why I became a Cub fan. I was 9 and I think I learned what it meant to have your hopes dashed. It’s been a love/hate relationship ever since.
I hate you. Please don’t leave.
by jerry morales rules on Feb 5, 2009 2:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
August 3-14, 1977
The Cubs went 3-9 during that time, and the Phillies won 12 in a row. Chicago went from 2.5 games up to 6.5 games out in the span of 12 days. Ouch!
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 5, 2009 3:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
1989 Montreal Expos Collapse
If it takes the sting out of the 1977 collapse, then think about what happened to the Expos in 1989. The 1977 Cubs were 62-42 at the end of play on August 2 and were only 19-39 the rest of the way to finish at 81-81 in fourth place.
The 1989 Expos were 63-44 and 3 games up at the end of play on August 2. The Expos were only 18-37 the rest of the way to finish at 81-81 in fourth place. Of course, the Cubs won the NL East in 1989. That regular season had a happy ending.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 5, 2009 3:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bobby Murcer, groan....
I never liked him in a Cubs uniform. Maybe it was my imagination back then but he seemed to hit a lot of warning track flyballs.
by rlpete on Feb 5, 2009 4:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Off Topic
Dusty and the Reds signed Jacque Jones.
by Rick B on Feb 5, 2009 4:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
There's a FanShot on this topic.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 5, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1977 Opening Day Lineup and Win Share Ratings
The Cubs lineup on opening day was a mostly a average group of regulars with nobody performing close to an All Star level, except maybe Bobby Murcer. If you use the Bill James Win Share standards (10-19 is an average player season; 20-30 is an All-Star season; and 30+ is a Hall of Fame Season) you get the following results for this bunch:
1B: Larry Biittner (11); 2B: Manny Trillo (14): SS: Ivan DeJesus (15); 3B: Steve Onterveros (18); LF: Jose Cardenal (3); CF: Jerry Morales (15); RF: Bobby Murcer (19); C : Steve Swisher (3); P: Ray Burris (10).
The studs on this team were Reuschel (26) and Sutter (27) and the reasons they won 81 games. The first half of the season with these guys was pretty interesting, but they were clearly unable to replace Bill Madlock with Bobby Murcer. And Trillo drops from .362 at midseason down to .280 – it was that kind of season.
by cub512 on Feb 5, 2009 7:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That July 28th game was incredible
It was my first summer home from college. I had a minimum-wage job in a warehouse in what we now call the West Loop. At least I was able to bring along a transistor radio and listen to Cubs games while I pulled merchandise for the shipping clerks.
I remember when the game started, when Vince & Lou mentioned 1) that Ray Burris was pitching and 2) the wind was blowing out. That meant some balls were heading into or over the bleachers, and indeed they did — 3 HRs, 6 runs, in the top of the first.
But the comebacks were amazing.
The game was still going on at quitting time, and I rode the “Evanston Express” north to Howard Street, still listening to the radio. I remember passing Wrigley as the game was still going on. People were crowding around to get game updates; I remember saying “Sutter struck out the side!”. I didn’t remember (but see on that baseball-reference link) that the strikeout victims were named Griffey, Foster, and Bench.
Remarkably, even by the time I got to Howard Street, caught a 97 bus west, and walked home to my family home in West Rogers Park, the game was still on, and I was able to see the finish on channel 9.
The next day’s Sun-Times headline was “The Most Exciting Game” and I’d heartily agree. I always wondered why that game isn’t replayed on ESPN Classic, while that 23-22 Phillies game (which the Cubs lost) is.
About that warehouse job: the other memory I have, which would have been a few weeks later, was being told by the security guard that Elvis Presley had died.
And that building? Now it’s been reborn as an office building, “River Center”, with polished marble walls at street level. But in 1977, it was a dump.
by ChipSet on Feb 5, 2009 8:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Elvis' death...
… was announced as a break-in bulletin during this game, which had gone into long extra innings (the Cubs finally won in the 15th).
When WGN returned to the game, Jack Brickhouse said, in his most fulsome tone, “What a sad bulletin!”
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 4:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Elvis
My mom cried for a week when Elvis died.
I remember that as well it being broken into during the game.
Barbara V. October 14, 1941 - December 19, 2008. A great lady who was a friend to all and like a second mom to her children's friends (she was my best friend's mom)
by cubstoseriesby100 on Feb 6, 2009 5:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, but I just couldn't believe R Reuschel would ever be a pinch runner
(even in a crazy 13 inning game) so I had to check the box score of the July 28th game. At the risk of being picky and detracting from a great story, Reuschel was in the game pitching (not as a pinch runner) and pitched 2/3 of an inning in the top of the 13th. He was up in the bottom of the 13th, singled, and eventually came around to score the winning run..
Anyway , thanks for a bumpy ride down memory lane.
by West Coast Diehard on Feb 5, 2009 10:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're right.
My memory failed me — I should have relied on the box score.
My dad was in the hospital that day with some back problems. He told me that when the Cubs won, you could hear cheering up and down the corridor outside his room.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 4:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i was at that game....
and since i was a 17 year old in Sheboygan, Wisconsin…it was a pretty big deal/flukey that my high school buds and I picked that one game out of the calendar (our only game that year) to make the big drive down to the big city..and whoa nellie….what we got to witness!! (and by the late innings, we had moved into the lower boxes by the dugout no less).
Pete Rose, leads off the game with a HR run and the Reds are off and running with a 6 spot off Ray Burris. Mitterwald and Buckner go yard twice. Reuschel indeed comes in to pitch..and improved to 15-3 (or 16?)…getting the win in relief (he would finish 20-10, ughhhh), and scores the winning run on the Davey Rosello hit.
Lastly, just after Mitterwald’s bottom 12 HR to tie it…Gene Clines comes up….hits a blast that immediately leaves his bat and we all think he had gone back to back and the game was over. It wasn’t as it fell short of the wall for a double. The Reds get out of the inning, before the Cubs win it in the13th. Still…..everytime I see this friend from HS (which is extremely rare these days)….we look at each other and simultaneously say “I thought Cline’s shot was OUT!!” What a memory. Still have the game stub.
by jimvanders on Feb 8, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that box from that game..
is INDEED worth spending some time on.
by jimvanders on Feb 8, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That boxscore can be found...
… here.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 9, 2009 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs defense in the 12th and 13th
another wild aspect of that game was in the top of the12th and 13th. Franks had run out of infielders so he had to move Murcer to the infield. Check out how with each batter Murcher and Rosello (a true utility infielder) would flip flop. If a righty was up, Rosello would play short and Murcer second. If a lefty came up, they’d switch. I had never seen that before, nor since. At least not for TWO FULLING INNINGS.
by jimvanders on Feb 9, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and incidentally...
… Rick Reuschel WAS once used as a pinch-runner. For Steve Ontiveros.
No, really. August 27, 1978. The Cubs lost 5-4 in 10 innings.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 4:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Date is actually August 27, 1979 in the above link, not 1978.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we had fun discussing this a few months ago ..
In this post .. I posted a pic of Rick’s triumphant rounding of the base.
1977 .. ah, what a fun year .. a return to innocence!
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Feb 6, 2009 7:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course I was unable to see this season
But its interesting reading articles about Cubs seasons from the past. Keep em coming!
Erm, well if we are going to call Milton Bradley nicknames, mine is Fischer Price: yes, you heard it here first..
by Chanman25 on Feb 6, 2009 6:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This year's version of "Wrigley Season Ticket"...
… which will have a different name (“Maple Street Press Cubs Annual”) but the same type of articles, will have long articles on the 1969 Cubs and the 1989 Cubs.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Feb 6, 2009 7:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You may enjoy this if you haven't seen it before
A nice analysis of the late 60’s and especially the ’69 team.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/the-williams-santo-cubs-1966-1969/
by rlpete on Feb 6, 2009 8:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
“Ontiveros was an acceptable 3B, but his hitting was atrocious — despite hitting .299 with 32 doubles and 81 walks in 1977, he scored only 54 runs.”
A) In 1977, Ontiveros had an OPS+ of 109. This means his hitting was above the league average and could not be called “atrocious” in any reasonable sense.
B) The use of a runs scored stat as a detriment is meaningless. Unless a guy hits only home runs, he needs the OTHER players on the team to make him score.
This misinformation posted is not only wrong, it undercuts the argument that going from Madlock to Ontiveros was a bad move. Ironically, the underlying argument is correct. I just wish the facts and been gotten right.
by Ivychat on Feb 6, 2009 3:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ditto
It can be said that Ontiveros’ hitting was atrocious in other seasons, but not in ‘77. There are a number of factors that determine the number of runs that a player scores. First, the player must get on base. Steve did so at a .390 pace in 1977 and that rate is more than sufficient. Second, there must be good hitters behind him to advance him around the bases. The Cubs may have been a bit lacking in that department, but that doesn’t tell the whole story. The third factor is a player’s baserunning ability. A player must have good instincts to know when to take the extra base, have good technique at rounding the bases and have adequate speed.
I can’t recall whether Ontiveros had any talent for rounding the bases, but I know that he was a snail on the bases. Statues can probably run faster than Ontiveros did. The fact that the Cubs used Reuschel to pinch run for him pretty much says it all. Reuschel wasn’t the slowest man alive, but he was no speed demon to be sure.
by FrankSereno on Feb 7, 2009 5:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















