Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

More evidence Dusty Baker set the Cubs back 5 years

Star-divide

There's a FanShot that already addresses this Jeff Passan article in Yahoo! sports, but I figured this could use both a "what if" analysis and some lively discussion about the 2003 Cubs rotation abuse.

The section of the article that nauseates me is the following:  "You’d hope so, though the universal consensus is that Cubs manager Dusty Baker abused Prior at the end of the 2003 season simply because he knew no better. In Prior’s last nine games, including three in the playoffs, he logged the following pitch counts: 131, 129, 109, 124, 131, 133, 132, 115, 119. House believes the overuse by Baker doomed Prior."

Looking @ Prior's gamelogs from 2003 (courtesy of Baseball Reference), during all 9 games, Prior left with the lead (including NLCS Game 6).  By taking out 0.2 or 1 inning of work per game from Prior's arm, you come up with these pitch counts:  112, 104, 109 (didn't modify), 104, 97, 117, 113, 88, 95.  Assuming the bullpen would've held up the lead, one could say that those extra innings worked (and subsequent pitches thrown) were unnecessary.  One extra and probably related note on the extra pitches thrown--Prior seemed to inflate his pitch count right before he got pulled (he threw 34 pitches alone in the 8th inning on 9/21)

For you Wood fanboys,  here's his pitch counts the last 10 games of the season (including postseason):  125, 120, 122, 114, 125, 122, 124, 117, 109, 112.  Again, taking out 0.2 or 1 inning of work, you could come up with these pitch counts:  109, 96, 107, 114, 100, 95, 98, 106, 109, 100.  Modifying Wood's workload was much more difficult--he pitched a CG shutout during the 2nd 122 pitch game, and a few of those games were either in doubt or losses.

Moral of the story:  overusing your golden arms does NOT create a Braves-like dynasty; just a lot of heartache & millions of dollars wasted.  All comments are appreciated.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs  |  Comment 89 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Do we need more evidence????

I can sorta understand the many Blanco/DeRo/Wood posts. They were popular players on LAST years team. To follow them this year, is something many of us will likely do.

But Prior/Dusty Baker? Wasn’t that topic beat into the ground maybe a year or two ago?

"That's what you live for. You live for the opportunity and when that day comes, you better be ready," Soto said. "I tried to make sure that whenever they gave me a chance, I was ready and I knew I had to take advantage of the opportunity."

by Madison Cub Fan on Mar 13, 2009 1:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Only 5 years?

I hope they don’t overuse Zambrano, Harden & Lilly too much. We might need one of them to go to San Diego for Peavy

"It was a wise Man that invented Beer" (Plato)

by LarryCubFan on Mar 13, 2009 2:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They already overused Big Z.

There’s an insider article on that very subject today on espn.com.

by Kornchex on Mar 13, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

I liked the article, I don’t think we are beating this down. Just sad commentary and what might have been. Wonder if Dusty will run the young Reds arms into the ground?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Mar 13, 2009 6:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Its hard to pin it all on Dusty

One can never tell if it was Dustys antiquated methods, or if those two were predisposed to arm problems; I would argue its the latter, which couldve been hastened by Dustys old school ways, either way, with the litany of DL stints between the two of them, they were bound to break down at some point.

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Mar 13, 2009 6:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not all Baker's fault

The Yahoo article clearly indicated that Prior had bad mechanics, he refused to change them, House was feeding him bad info, and the towel drill, which he was doing constantly, is apparently a bad drill that helps ruin arms.

by dr stabbingworth on Mar 13, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big +1

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on Mar 13, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen!

"He can't hit, he can't field, he can't run—all he can do is beat you."

by Itchy on Mar 13, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

"I owe [Dunston] a lot. Nobody would know how good I was at digging balls out of the dirt if it wasn't for him..." -Mark Grace
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Mar 13, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

another rec

"I lof to hit de home ron!"

by Tekboy on Mar 13, 2009 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and another.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Mar 16, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, no, no.

The article suggested Prior might have had bad mechanics – something that has been suggested but not proved. In my limited view, the arguments for Prior’s mechanics being good have been more convincing than the arguments that they were bad.

Bold 2009 Cub Prediction: Of the Cubs' OFs, Joey Gathright ends the season with an OBP second only to Milton Bradley.

by DGU on Mar 15, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There can NEVER be enough stories

About what a disaster Dusty Baker was. The 2003 NLCS was like a junk food high. Overall, he was bad for this entire franchise.

Prior however, is just not physically capable of being a major league pitcher.

I’ll blame Dusty for psychologically damaging Prior to the point where he refused to pitch if he didn’t feel perfect, but I think Prior would have fell apart with a 100-pitch limit too.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Mar 13, 2009 6:56 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Agreed. Never Forget.

But seriously, no reason to speculate about what Prior may have done with rational pitch limits.

We know that Prior had absolutely no pitch limits, and we know his career completely fell apart.

For a contraindicator, look at Rich Harden with the A’s. Incredibly injury prone. Tons of shoulder problems and DL stints. And yes, strict pitch counts.

BUT…. no surgeries whatsoever, and back to pitching with ungodly effectiveness for the 2008 season.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We will never know...

…but I am convinced Prior would have had the same fate regardless of a stricter pitch count in 03.

Some guys have what it takes (physically and mentally) to be a dependable major league starter and some don’t. I don’t think Prior had either one to last any length of time no matter who his manager was.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Mar 16, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 16, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Glad We Have Lou

The Cubs recovered nicely in 2007 with Lou Piniella from an atrocious 2006 and a bad second half of 2005. It was just simply time for Dusty to go after 2006, when his contract was up. He may have set the team back two years but not five years. The Cubs made a good decision to quit relying on Prior and Wood as starters.

"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Mar 13, 2009 7:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Funny

I was just thinking yesterday how quiet the injury front has been this S.T. I think many of us over the past few years grew accustom to hearing this injury or that injury to whoever. Let us hope this season the Cubs have minimal injuries, not just to the staff, but position players as well.

"You can't take life to seriously, you don't get out of it alive"

by wild bill on Mar 13, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lou cleaned house

Remember, in the first 1/3 of 2007, this was a bad club on its way to another 3rd/4th place finish.

by dr stabbingworth on Mar 13, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate to pile on one player, because I liked him, but....

….isn’t it funny how things turned completely around when the Cubs improved their catcher defense?

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

…and it wasn’t just the defense, it was the block head baserunning errors from Barrett and choosing to incite the other team (when they were dead in the water) at the wrong time – see 2004 Astros.

A good catcher must have a feel for all important aspects of the game, Barrett was numb all over.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Mar 16, 2009 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was time for Dusty to go far, far earlier than that.

He should have been fired after the 2004 season. By that point, it was clear that he had serious deficiencies w/r/t baseball strategy, and weird personality issues to boot.

By October 2004, we knew that Dusty had no business managing a 9-figure payroll. I wouldn’t let him manage my fantasy team.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

And I know it’s debatable how much effect a manager really has on a team’s win-loss record, but I fear the 2009 Cincinnati Reds a lot less with Dusty at the helm. A young team like that does not seem like a good fit for his managerial “approach.”

"That little kid at second base - he is after a job, isn't he?" ~ Lou Piniella, 3/9/09

by dat cubfan daver on Mar 13, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only that -

but Dusty wasn’t even able to do the one thing he was supposed to do – manage the big personality.

Bold 2009 Cub Prediction: Of the Cubs' OFs, Joey Gathright ends the season with an OBP second only to Milton Bradley.

by DGU on Mar 15, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

Time to let this go.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 13, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitching motion

Analysis of his pitching motion from year to year (linked from the Yahoo article) shows he made a lot of changes to his motion. I doubt Baker had much to do with it, except under Baker, Prior had to make a lot more pitches with his bad motion.

by dr stabbingworth on Mar 13, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

another defense of Dusty

had we had a better bullpen, and deeper pitching depth (like our 7 man rotation today) Prior could have been either pitched less innings, or traded when his value was high and some people would not be looking for ways pin Dusty for something that is truly not his fault.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

glad he is looking at the Ohio River

Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."

by Ivy Walls on Mar 13, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boooo.

In NLCS Game 2, we were ahead by 9 runs in the 8th inning, Prior was already over 100 pitches, and Dusty sent him back out there for more abuse.

If the Borowski-Farnsworth-Remlinger bullpen couldn’t hold a 9 run lead for 6 outs, I would eat my hat. In fact, as it happens, after Prior got cuffed around a bit, that bullpen managed to hold a smaller lead for 6 outs.

You cannot defend Dusty’s decision here. You know that he abused Prior. The only possible argument you can make is that “no one can prove that Dusty’s abuse of Prior was the proximate cause of his injuries.”

Which is, of course, true. No one can conclusively prove that.

I don’t think that matters a bit.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed -- furthermore

Why wasn’t Zambrano just as injured, if it was all Dusty’s fault?

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point

and when I think about it, Maddux used to tell the coaching staff he was done, and it was time for the bullpen to take over. Why are Prior and Wood not responsible for knowing their limitations and doing similar? No one knows your body as well as you do, no matter what the studies, pitch count limitations or trends state. You know when you are done, anyone who has pitched before knows when they are losing their stuff and it is time to let your mates pick you up.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, how long had Maddux been playing?

Young players are more likely to stay in, both because they aren’t as aware of their limits (they haven’t had as much experience with them) and because they have more of a tendency to want to be heroes, as we all do in any pursuit when we’re 22, 23, 24 years old.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Mar 14, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who compares to Maddux

I think comparing any pitcher to Maddux is not fair. Maddux seems to have a better understanding of all aspects of pitching than any pitcher in baseball. One very important aspect being that at some point you are no longer effective, there’s nothing you can do about it and winning is more important than personal pride or stats.

by Rockford Die Hard on Mar 15, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because Zambrano was less susceptible to injury?

I don’t understand why this is so hard for some to follow.

No one is saying that every pitcher reacts the same to high pitch counts, or that high pitch counts will automatically lead to injury for every single pitcher.

What I am saying is that high pitch counts are correlated with injury. Generally speaking, repeated high-pitch outings increase the risk of injury.

And as such, it was stupid to let AJ Burnett or Mark Prior hit the 130 pitch mark so often so early in their careers.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, that's arrogant
I don’t understand why this is so hard for some to follow.

I said, “if it was all Dusty’s fault”. I don’t understand why that’s so hard for you to follow . . . .

Baker had issues. I doubt that he was solely responsible for Wood (remember 1999?) or Prior.
How many in baseball think that he was?

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We Will Never Know The Answer

… the truth of the matter is somewhere with Amelia Earhart. Still, it looks like House blames Baker… and I wonder if Prior will too whenever his baseball career is finally done.

by TheHawkRules on Mar 13, 2009 9:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

There may be enough blame to go around for House, Baker and others.

Again, as you say, “we will never know the answer”. Time to move on.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 13, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aaron Harang has been pitching even longer.

Could Dusty’s decision to use him 3 times in 5 days last year really have caused his injuries and derailed him completely?

Well, probably, yes.

Prior was a 22-year old who Dusty saddled with 2 months worth of pitchcounts that would make Curt Schilling blush.

You are right that it’s impossible to say that those months destroyed his career. But you can’t prove the inverse, either. What we do know is that pitchers who have run that kind of a gauntlet of abuse have gotten injured at an absolutely ridiculous rate — and that it’s even worse for young pitchers.

What Dusty did was completely inexcusable. He should have been fired.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how much of the problems

lie more in the training that the pitchers do now compared to when there was a four man rotation and it was not uncommon for a pitcher to throw 125+ twice a week?

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There were fewer teams back then, too.

And when young pitchers blew their arms out, it was no huge loss. They weren’t paying him anything (and nothing at all after the current season…), there was someone else in the giant minor league system ready to go, and the broken armed kid retired to sell insurance, and you never heard about him again.

Look at Jim Bouton. Do you think he would have had to become a knuckleballer if he hadn’t completely blown his arm out throwing 95 MPH heat every 4 days? Could Tommy John have avoided Tommy John surgery?

There are just as many superstar invulnerable aces in the game today as there were back then. Some people’s arms can just handle the abuse. But for every Nolan Ryan whose arm didn’t fall off in the old days, there was another kid who had to retire with a ligament tear.

The prime difference is that teams now have exponentially more $$ invested in young pitchers, thereby ratcheting up teams’ incentive to keep them healthy. Moreover, we now have the knowledge necessary to improve the chances of keeping these vulnerable young pitchers healthy through their “red alert” years of ages 20-25.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

meaning

genetics are quite possibly as much to blame is not more than Dusty

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

is = if

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that you're following the argument.

We’re assuming that some pitchers are genetically predisposed to become injured under high pitch counts.

We’re also agreeing that no one can conclusively tell which pitcher is vulnerable to high pitch counts, and which is invulnerable, before the fact.

We’re also agreeing that, for young pitchers, a series of high pitch-count games is correlated with elbow and shoulder injuries.

Now, you’re entrusted with an incredibly talented young pitcher in whom the team has invested 10 million dollars.

You don’t know if he’s susceptible to injury, or a Livan-esque workhorse.

You can err on the side of caution, and limit his pitch counts. It might help. It might not. It might not have even been necessary, if the guy turns out to be Nolan Ryan durable.

Or you could ride him as hard as you possibly can, let him throw 130 pitches for 9 straight starts, hope he survives, and if he breaks down, blame his genetics and say something like “it turned out he was vulnerable to getting injured under high pitch-count loads, but who could have possibly known that?”

If you choose option B, you are Jeff Torborg or Dusty Baker.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of the 4 "horses" Baker rode in 2003

only Carlos Zambrano hasn’t had major injury problems since then and he has trouble pitching well from opening bell to closing bell. It’s possible that all four of these guys have bad genetics. It’s probable that at least one of them has issues in addition to what Dusty did. But it’s also clear that Dusty overworks pitchers because he doesn’t understand the modern game of baseball. There’s a lot Dusty does know about baseball, but there’s a lot more he doesn’t fathom at all.

Bold 2009 Cub Prediction: Of the Cubs' OFs, Joey Gathright ends the season with an OBP second only to Milton Bradley.

by DGU on Mar 15, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One of the other differences between then and now is...

… and pitchers from the 60’s and before will tell you this, is that back then, they wouldn’t throw their hardest stuff in the early innings; they’d save some heat for the 8th and 9th.

Now, pitchers go all-out from pitch #1, knowing that when they reach 100-110, they’ll be relieved. Except, of course, if their manager is Dusty Baker.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 13, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitchers did pace themselves...

…more back in the day, because they knew how to pitch vs knowing how to throw.

Lot’s of ways to get hitters out, but you have to be able to hit your spot and make the right pitch.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Mar 16, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

You’re nailing ’em today.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 16, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the fact is, pitchers aren't trained to throw that much

so the manager shouldn’t do it. Period. I don’t know how anyone could argue with the point that Baker had no business using Prior the way he did. He still may have wound up injured, but Baker showed absolutely no concern for the player or the team’s investment.

"Enough foreplay- let's get crackin'"- Fred Garvin

by davidalanu on Mar 13, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

where is the unequivolcal evidence

that 100 pitches is the magic number? This abuse thing makes me sick as people who never pitched or played the game (not saying you specifically) want to cry foul at 100 pitches. There are fewer pitchers who get hurt as there are pitchers who remain injury free—it’s not because of pitch counts.

If a pitcher averages 4 pitches per plate appearance (pretty efficient although I am unsure of the “average” number), he would be removed after 8 innings IN A PERFECT GAME because he’s at 96 pitches. That’s why this entire 100 pitch thing stinks. It’s arbitrary and cannot be applied to all.

The culprit is the player’s mechanics, not some arbitrary feel-good number that leads to injuries. If you recall correctly at that time, Prior was said to have the best mechanics of any young pitcher ever and Wood had made major overhauls in his delivery. Revisionist history proves those calls were incorrect.

by socalbob on Mar 13, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

plus to use the pitch count as a measuring tool for injuries

really leaves some interesting questions with relievers who get injured nad throw 10 pitches, or a LOOGY going down after three pitches.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We have decades of empirical evidence.

First, I hate fighting strawmen. Where did I, or anyone else in this thread, state that 100 pitches is the “magic number”? I don’t even think that the people counting “pitcher abuse points” give much for a 100 pitch outing.

As for the science of pitchcount restrictions as a whole — There are some pretty smart people who are charged with keeping track of these kinds of statistics. And there are, literally, tens of millions of dollars on the line.

With tens of thousands of games worth of data, and knowing in hindsight which young pitchers avoided injury, and which needed arm reconstruction, we can pretty conclusively estimate that high pitchcounts correlate strongly with injuries in young pitchers. Whether that’s caused by a pitcher’s good mechanics being altered by fatigue, or simply by repetitive use of the same muscles more than 100-110 times or so, is completely irrelevant.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Mar 13, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I understood

you to be fully engaged in the pitcher abuse argument and with that understanding then you would know “100 pitches” and then the number of ptiches above that number are considered “abuse.” You even referenced the 100 & 110 numbers in your last paragraph, so I don’t know why you make that an issue. I pose this question—why are there no abuse points for pitches from 55 up to 75, are there? And why is that?

Fatigue could take all forms—backing up bases to covering first base to running the bases to fielding bunt plays. However, given that pitchers train harder through running and core strength maintenance today than in any past era, I don’t buy a fatigue argument. It’s is mechanical failure and flaws that lead to injuries. Prior has broken down twice DURING BULLPEN sessions after being surgically repaired because his mechanics are still poor for throwing a baseball.

You failed to provide what I asked for with a reply about “smart people and money on the line.” It’s okay too because there is NO scientific evidence for injuries related to this so-called “pitcher abuse” theory. You subcribe to a pitcher throwing 110+ pitches every 5th day for 9 starts in a row leads to a breakdown, but if he only threw 100 pitches (90 or so less pitches over a 45 day period) than he’d be ok. I don’t subscribe to that.

For the record, I do not defend Dusty for what he did in the NLCS as I feel he should have taken Prior out earlier, but all the other games to get the Cubs to the playoffs he was right on.

You wrote: we can pretty conclusively estimate that high pitchcounts correlate strongly with injuries in young pitchers

No we can’t. Bad mechanics correlate strongly with injuries. It may take longer if that pitcher doesn’t throw as many innings or pitches, but the pitcher with bad mechanics will break down.

We have differing views on this subject. And I do not blame Dusty for Prior and Wood breakdowns. Their poor mechanics led to their injuries.

by socalbob on Mar 13, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

One game over the pitch count doesn't hurt

No one is saying you should pull a guy if he’s got a perfect game going.

The idea is that you risk injury if you run him out there for 110-130 pitches over and over and over again. Unless I missed Prior pitching nine perfect games in a row, that argument doesn’t apply.

Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.

by cocknfire on Mar 14, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harang situation to Prior

Is as apples are to oranges

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who is this Dusty Baker that you speak of?

Sorry, I just had to say that….. Thankfully, I think I’m finally ready to let it go……I’m so thankful for the old codger that we have now.

Hey Lou, we're long overdue.

by deadcatbounce on Mar 13, 2009 11:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Dusty didn't ruin Mark Prior or Kerry Wood

This has been endless debate for several years. Let it go. I firmly am of the belief that Dusty did little to abuse his starting pitchers. On the margin it can perhaps be argued that going to the whip hard on Prior was not wise. But the medical professionals were baffled for years what if anything was wrong with Prior’s arm. What it boils down to is that Prior was predisposed to flame out quickly, for a combination of factors to likely include his mechanics, physical DNA and makeup, and commitment to craft.

Kerry Wood? Well Wood was a china doll ever since his return in 2000. He was never remotely the same pitcher coming off of major surgery in 1999. His durability was never good, nor was the consistency of his performance on the mound. Laying blame on the doorstep of Dusty for the woes of Kerry Wood is wrong.

We as Cub fans were naive and gullible with both these pitchers. We let ourselves believe that Kerry Wood was going to be the next Roger Clemens or Nolan Ryan after his 1998 season. Then we let ourselves believe that Mark Prior was going to be the next Tom Seaver after his 2003 season. Meanwhile Carlos Zambrano was a near-after thought among Cub fans at the time but has gone on to be one of the best starting pitchers in baseball.

by BLou on Mar 13, 2009 12:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

didn't

Riggleman get balmed, then Baylor, and now Baker, soon Lou will be blamed somehow. No one wants to blame the pitchers themselves for their inability to correct an issue, or train properly during an off season, or God forbid just accept that their bodies were injury prone no matter what they tried to do differently.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 13, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ive always wondered

What makes one injury prone? Its kinda the chicken and egg argument. Was Prior bound to have serve injury problems at this birth? Or did the brutal pitch counts he suffered early in his career cause his injuries? In my opinion, those pitch counts are insane and should have never happened. But its all in the past now. Nothing for the best for Mark though. I would love to see him pitch again. But not against the Cubs!

by TJ3117 on Mar 13, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that it's way too simple to blame Baker for Prior's (and Wood's) breakdowns.

There are so many different schools of thought and variables about this that we’ll obviously never have a definitive answer. And you correctly point out that various doctor’s couldn’t diagnose Prior’s problems which just goes to show how complicated it really was/is.

At the same time, Baker (and Riggleman ) certainly didn’t help the situation by riding them as hard as they did early on.

by bluekoolaide on Mar 13, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You really need to stop with the Dusty bashing...

You need to remember that Dusty almost got the Cubs to the promised land in his first year. You need to remember that Dusty has a proven track record as a manager, (a winning manager at that), that continues to get jobs in MLB. This is not by chance. It is because Dusty is a professional baseball man. I will never forgive Chicago for maligning Dusty and running him out of town in the shameful way that they did. I was there, it wasn’t the pitch counts, it was the bad trainers who didn’t realize how badly Prior was hurt, and rushed him back after Giles flipped him onto his pitching shoulder. Give it up. Please.

Jimmyeatworld

by Jimmyeatworld on Mar 14, 2009 12:22 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This isn't all of it, either.

Talking about rushing back — it’s pretty clear to me, at least, that Prior shouldn’t have been rushed back after the line drive from Hawpe hit him on the elbow. At the time it appeared to be season-ending, if not career-threatening, yet he was back in four weeks.

In retrospect, it’s possible that injury forced him to subtly alter his motion and possibly led to the labrum problems.

In 2005, he was 4-1, 2.93 in nine starts, 58.1 innings, with 18 BB, 62 K before the injury.

After his return he was 7-6, 4.07 in 18 starts, 108.1 innings.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 14, 2009 4:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

plus some players in all sports

never have the same mental edge after a major injury. how likely is it Prior was never the same mentally, and that contributed to his set backs

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 14, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 14, 2009 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd again

and I would add that today’s pitchers generally have more days of rest between starts than pitchers who were members of a four-man starting staff. You would think that this would decrease injuries significantly.

I think that Dusty is often made a convenient scapegoat for the problems of two pitchers, and we would probably not even care about any of it if the Cubs had managed to get those five outs before Florida could come back. I remember many people bashing Lou for pulling Z early in Game 1 of the 2007 NLDS to ostensibly save his arm for later, yet we still have to hear about Baker letting his horses go too long.

I am convinced there is no perfect scenario in which a manager of the Cubs would be given a passing grade in Pitch Count 101, unless that scenario resulted in a WS win. That appears to be the benchmark for all the Goldilocks hindsight.

"I've got an idea...an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about." ~Peter Griffin

by Goodie1969 on Mar 14, 2009 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Major League pitching seems to fly in the face of all athletic training methods. Sprinters train

by running middle distances. Middle distance runners train by running the mile. Basketball and football players train by practicing for two hours and playing for one hour. By contrast, major league pitchers are not allowed to throw more than 60 or 70 pitches in the minors and then are expected to come to the big leagues and throw 120 pitches per game. Does that make sense? Many of the top pitchers are rushed to the big leagues before they get enough pitching under their belts because of the pressures of performing after signing a big contract. No wonder many of them need elbiw and shoulder surgery.

"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris

by willie mays hayes' gloves on Mar 14, 2009 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also rec'd

Good in general, but the “Goldilocks hindsight” is perfect.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 14, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+ Jack Morris and Dave Stewart

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 14, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very well said!!!!!

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Mar 16, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitch counts in general

We have to acknowledge that times have changed in society, affecting baseball.

It IS true that the 1970s were a golden era for durable arms. Ryan, Carlton, Seaver, Blyleven, and Gibson among others, all had high pitch counts and remained healthy.

It is also true that the number of pitches per game hasn’t changed all that much. It’s still roughly 145-150. It’s just now you almost always have at least two and more often 4-6 pitchers making those pitches.

But life has changed, both in baseball and the real world. Here’s how:

Yes, there are still 150 pitches per game, but those first 85 pitches are arguably much tougher than they used to be. The DH removed the easy out. Smaller ballparks and strike zones meant pitches had to be much more precise. Steroids turned pop flies into home runs.

Nolan Ryan and Bob Gibson had the freedom to throw balls under the chin as well, opening up the outside corner, which the ump was far more likely to give them. That’s gone.

But even more, society has changed.

  • Kids are instructed more thoroughly than ever before. Nolan Ryan and his ilk would play baseball from sunup to sundown and threw god knows how many pitches. Now, 8 year olds are on pitch counts.
  • The best arms don’t always play baseball now. The kid with the strongest arm in school is now just as likely to be a quarterback.
  • Pitch counts are now being tracked. And stop whining about it. Teams never used to track OPS either.

Simply put, today’s 17-year-olds, the ones scouts are watching, aren’t ready to throw 150 pitches. They haven’t been prepared for it. It’s not their fault, really.

And instead of whining about it and blathering on about the old days, managers should get with the fricking program and adjust to the tools they have.

So yes, it’s Baker’s fault. It’s every manager’s fault.

Nolan Ryan ain’t walking through that door. The old days are over.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Mar 14, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Nobody is advocating having 17-year-olds throw 150 pitches. The problem with your theory is that there is no proof that

limiting pitch counts alone is the answer to limiting pitching injuries. One of the problems with limiting pitch counts is that you also limit workout pitching also and many believe that that is more important than the actual pitch count in a game. Off-line throwing has been reduced in an attempt to save high-priced arms and many believe that this type of work builds arm strength and conditions the body to be able to survive the rigors of big league pitching. Side sessions and periods of long toss are extremely vital in building the variety of muscles needed to pitch a baseball at 95 miles an hour without tearing your arm to shreads.

We know that pitch counts aren’t going away, but you can’t totally disregard the past when investigating why pitchers get injured and how to avoid excessive injuries. The easy out is to blame the managers, but how do you explain a pitcher who has never thrown 100 pitches in a game getting an arm injury? The ‘fricken program" you refer to needs to be adjusted so that pitchers are prepared to throw before the get to the big leagues. If you rush a guy to the big leagues because you paid him a multi-million dollar signing bonus and he gets hurt, are you going to blame the manager for that too? It’s not as simple as stopping at 100 pitches. If it were, the A’s would never have a pitching injury, and we know that’s not the case.

"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris

by willie mays hayes' gloves on Mar 14, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely

There are some pitchers, either through genetics or luck, that can go longer and there are some that have rotten luck. Prior himself suffered two non-pitching injuries in the collision on the basepaths and that shot up the middle.

But my problem is with a manager like Baker, who acts as if he is managing in the 50s. A manager who sneers at pitch counts is no more useful than a manager who insists on having his guys throw of a 15-inch mound.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Mar 15, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not going to defend Baker. He went to the whip with Prior and Wood and they both brokedown afterwards,

that much is fact. I will concede that if a pitcher is lightly worked before reaching the big leagues, the best course of action is to limit his pitches. If you work them lightly in the minors, it’s ludicrous to grind them into the ground when they reach the bigs. That approach won’t eliminate injuries, but it certainly makes more sense.

My problem is with not preparing kids for the grind of pitching in the big leagues. it’s crazy to not prepare an arm for the big leagues and then rush them along because the have signed a big contract. You are just ruining an investment with that approach. Proper preparation will lead to better performance and reduced injuries.

"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris

by willie mays hayes' gloves on Mar 15, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the chin pitch

is lost because of batters wearing all kinds of padding and hanging over the plate. I have seen hitters start to charge the mound on a called strike that was too “inside” for their liking.

"I like coconuts, you can break them open and they smell like ladies lying in the sun" Widespread Panic

by Cubbie-Tim on Mar 14, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty Baker is one of the best and most respected managers in the game

I’m not going to defend Dusty Baker, but fact is he has been a big league manager for 15 years plus now. He had less than inspiring rosters in San Francisco, yet for the majority of his 10 years with the Giants his teams were solid ballclubs that contended. Dusty also did something in 2003 with the Cubs that nobody has been able to do in years, and that is to get the Cubs to the National League Championship Series. Now Dusty presides over an emerging Cincinnati ballclub that is bursting with good young talent.

Walt Jocketty is one of the most respected GMs in baseball. It speaks volumes that Jocketty has stuck with Dusty in Cincinnati even though his predessor Wayne Krivsky hired him. I dont’ see Jocketty lamenting about Dusty ruining bright young arms in Johnny Cueto, Edwin Volsquez or Homer Bailey. I also see that Dusty is committed to playing young talents in Joey Votto and Jay Bruce, among others.

Dusty got two bum raps in Chicago.

1. He was unwilling to play the kids. To that, I say horseshit. Fact is the youngsters supplied him by the Cub farm system were crap and Dusty was smart enough to know it. Just like Sweet Lou has been smart enough to smell out crap.

2. He ruined Mark Prior and Kerry Wood. Again, to that I say horseshit. Wood was never the same after 1998 and will go down in the annals of baseball as one of the most enigmatic pitchers of all time. Prior was and is a medical mystery with bad mechanics and where you seriously have to question his commitment to craft.

by BLou on Mar 14, 2009 3:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The truth is somewhere in the middle

I’m no Theriot fan, but you really think that playing Neifi Perez over him in 2006 was the right move? I sure don’t.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 14, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

C'mon

Dusty is to be doomed for not playing a Ryan Theriot who quite frankly fell into the category of non-prospect at the time?

Dusty got ripped to shreds in this town for “mis-handling” Hee Seop Choi, Bobby Hill, Corey Patterson. Hindsight vindicates Dusty 100%. Fact is the Cub farm system supplied Dusty with crap and he was smart enough in his assessment skills to play people like Eric Karros, Randy Simon, Neifi Perez. And speaking of Perez, you can rip him all you want. But fact is the guy was an exceptional defensive middle infielder. Absent of other wondrous options, I can certainly understand why Dusty went to Neifi. Did he play Neifi too much? Sure he did. But if that ranks has one of his most egregious decisions while in Chicago then my goodness.

Dusty wore out his welcome in Chicago and needed to be let go. And he was. But fact is he is a damned fine manager that has consistently presided over teams that contend. He’s got something good going in Cincinnati too. And isn’t it ironic that Dusty has a lineup card full of youngsters. Actually GOOD youngsters in contrast to the crap he had to work with in Chicago.

by BLou on Mar 14, 2009 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I said, in the middle

The Neifi Perez reference isn’t intended to be a summary of the Baker era. It is intented to refute the claim that he’s a great talent evaluator.

I’ve gone on record more than once saying that Baker took the 2003 Cubs further than anyone else likely would have. I also think he gets way too much blame for Wood and Prior — although to fire a trainer is absurd — Baker sent Prior back to the mound after the collision with Giles, not the trainer.

As good as 2003 was, 2004 was the beginning of the end. That was the most unlikeable, unfocused Cubs team I’ve ever followed.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Mar 15, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty was smart enough to know it who was talented and who wasn't?

Dusty was so married to Corey Patterson that he brought him back to Cinci last year for one more go at being a lead-off-man.

Meanwhile Dusty is the only manager that couldn’t get anything out of Juan Cruz, who has been a fantastic bullpen arm everywhere else.

Bold 2009 Cub Prediction: Of the Cubs' OFs, Joey Gathright ends the season with an OBP second only to Milton Bradley.

by DGU on Mar 15, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re

Dusty Baker is the Jessie Jackson of MLB, he earned his reputation in both SF and Chicago because he’s a clueless former player who thinks his sole responsibility as a manager is to hand in a lineup card full of grizzled vets, and as long as he’s the manager in Cincy, the Reds won’t win a thing.

Under Baker, the Cubs went farther than expected in the 2003 playoffs after winning a very weak Central and then proceeded to crash and burn after a long, painful death spiral that only served to demonstrate what a poor manager Baker is. Under Piniella, the Cubs have become consistent winners led by a manager who actually knows the game of baseball and isn’t afraid to get off his ass and run his team. The difference between the two couldn’t be more pronounced.

I don’t know if Dusty Baker ruined any specific player’s career (although his inability to manage a pitching staff has been one constant throughout his managerial career), but I am absolutely positive he ruined the Cubs as a team. And I’m ecstatic that he’s managing in the same division as the Cubs because the Reds will have to overcome both the Cubs and their own manager to keep the Cubs out of their third straight playoffs this year.

by Jed Taylor on Mar 16, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You make it sound so simple, but the fact is the Cubs organization has

decided to make a serious financial committment to winning now. This is unlike anytime in cub history. I agree that Pinella has proved that he can take this team to the playoffs, but don’t discount the fact that the Cubs now have a payroll that is representative of the support that the receive from their fans. You could not say that in the past.

Would Dusty win with the current Cubs roster? I certainly don’t know the answer to that question and neither do you. So don’t be so quick to point out how much better Lou has performed over Dusty. Yes, Lou has won a championship and Dusty has taken a team to the WS. If you criticize a manager when a team loses, you damn well ought to praise him when they win, and with all his faults, Dusty’s teams have won.

Dusty is long gone from Chicago now and it’s easy to pile on, but let’s be fair about it. Lou has yet to win a playoff game with a payroll significantly higher than Dusty had and Dusty’s Cub team was pretty close to the WS. I’m not advocating that Dusty is the manager that Lou is, but look at the facts objectively.

"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris

by willie mays hayes' gloves on Mar 16, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure if anyone noted this

but a year or so ago, Rick Peterson, who does work with one of those sports health institutes that focuses on pitching, mentioned in an article, which I’ll try and dig up, that when he looked at Prior coming out of college, he saw a pitcher whose mechanics were a mess and would lead to injuries throughout his career.

Ah … it was actually last summer in this Verducci article. It also noted the Bobby Brownlie situation.

Mark Prior is a classic example of a high-performing pitcher who was permitted to break down because of poor mechanics. Ironically, Prior was often hailed for his “flawless” mechanics when the Cubs drafted the righthander out of USC with the No. 2 pick in 2001, though that assessment seems to have been influenced by scouts’ preference for his 6’ 5", 225-pound body type. Studied closely, his mechanics included two severe red flags: 1) Prior lifted his throwing elbow higher than his shoulder before reaching the loaded position, increasing the stress on his elbow and shoulder; and 2) unlike Lincecum’s dynamic late torso rotation, Prior rotated his hips and torso before getting to the loaded position. With the letters of Prior’s jersey already facing the target, his arm could not simply “go along for the ride” — the ride was over, so his arm had to generate all of its own power.

Prior went 41-23 over his first four seasons in the big leagues. During that time, in 2003, when Prior was on his way to a career-high 18 wins, Peterson gave a presentation to the Oakland scouting department about “certain red flags in a delivery that we can’t do much about” as the A’s prepared for the draft. The idea was to avoid sinking large signing bonuses into players with a high potential to break down. (Late picks, because of their lower cost, don’t carry the same concern.)

One of Oakland’s scouts, responding to Peterson’s red-flag warnings, said, “Hey, that’s what Prior does. Are you saying that we shouldn’t draft a player like that?”

Replied Peterson, “No, not exactly. He’s one of the best pitchers in the league right now, but what I am saying is, If he doesn’t have maximum [shoulder] rotation, it will lead to injury. It’s like slamming the brakes over and over. The brake pads are going to wear out until it’s metal on metal.”

Prior has suffered a series of shoulder injuries that have limited him to one win and nine starts in the three seasons since. Still only 27, he is out for the season — again — after surgery to repair a tear in his right shoulder. “Prior is almost all upper body,” Chris Lincecum says. “You could cut his legs off and he would throw just as hard. I don’t like to put my finger on players, but I’ve been doing this a long time. I’ve said, ’He’s going to blow his elbow out’ or ‘His back will go out.’ Sure enough, it happens, including Dice-K [Daisuke Matsuzaka], Jake Peavy, Prior. . . . I have a hard time enjoying the game. I’m sitting there criticizing the pitcher. It hurts to watch pitchers. Seventy percent of the pros have poor mechanics.”

Bobby Brownlie was supposed to be Tim Lincecum. A 6-foot righthander from Rutgers who hit 97 mph on the gun, Brownlie was regarded as one of the top pitchers in the 2002 draft. Peterson was working as the A’s pitching coach at the time. Just before the draft, Oakland G.M. Billy Beane gave Peterson videotapes of some 20 pitchers the A’s were considering as draft picks and told him to break down each pitcher not by stuff and performance but by the biomechanics of their deliveries.

The previous winter Peterson had met Brownlie at a banquet and told him, “Hey, I hear you’re great. Congratulations, I hear you’re going to be a [first round] pick.” But when he watched Brownlie on the tape Beane had given him, Peterson says, "I’m literally sick to my stomach. I’m going, ‘This is so sad.’ "

A few days later, when Beane asked Peterson what he thought of Brownlie, the pitching coach replied, “He has certain characteristics in his delivery that will lead to shoulder problems.”

___________________

by toonsterwu on Mar 14, 2009 6:36 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Brownlie was hurt before he was even drafted.

That’s why he fell to the Cubs, who were picking fairly low that year due to their 88-74 record in 2001. Otherwise he might have been the first pick in the draft.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Mar 14, 2009 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting.

Thanks for that.

Bold 2009 Cub Prediction: Of the Cubs' OFs, Joey Gathright ends the season with an OBP second only to Milton Bradley.

by DGU on Mar 15, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

pitching

i cringe whenever lou lets zambrano throw a 120 pitches.you need to really baby these guys.in the 70,s you had guys like jenkins and gibson and lolich throwing 200 to 300 innings.and they were never hurt.how things have changed.

by NOMAR on Mar 15, 2009 8:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Ask BCB - Wacky Trade Proposals
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1

Recent FanPosts

Goodhawkdawson_pic_small
Dawson '88
Self-portrait-4_small
Tell Me About Mr. Cub
Small
What to do with Marshall?
Small
Time to get yelled at...
Cubs_small
Cubs HR Over/Under
Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

OT: Andruw Jones a White Sox
How Kosuke Fukudome Spends His Offseason
Miguel Cabrera Available, which leads me to ask if Granderson really is available
Keith Moreland On How The Cubs Can Win It All
Marlins Considering Moving June Series Vs. Mets To Puerto Rico
Mike Kiley insults Wrigley and Cubs fans
Muskat on Fuld : even DUMBER than usual
Free Agency Blunders
"I Want Mark DeRosa"
White Sox Sign Vizquel To One-Year Deal

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman