Stadium Graveyards
I stumbled across this page today while looking up old stadium pictures. This is a great site, with many modern pictures of the late stadiums to be demolished. It makes me sad that stadiums such as Ebbets, The Polo Grounds, and Comiskey are gone, because they were such historical stadiums that would definitely sell out crowds today..
almost 3 years ago
Chanman25
31 comments
9 recs |
Comments
Very cool pictures...
… including many I had never seen before. You can see how the new Yankee Stadium echoes the original, and how the Mets’ new ballpark echoes Ebbets Field.
Thanks for posting this!
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I stumbled across it while looking up Shea demolition pics
I think you can get to them from that website, but some die hard Met fans took solid pics of the stadium in the months that it was being demolished
#34: You'll be missed!
The Polo Grounds
makes the Crawford Boxes in Houston look challenging. I would imagine a dead pull hitter would have quite inflated HR numbers in that park. And a 483-ft. center field wall makes Dolphin Stadium look like a softball park.
"I've got an idea...an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about." ~Peter Griffin
I like seeing the Dodgers at the Colisseum pics
Where Left field looks like it could have been 250 feet and right field was so much larger
#34: You'll be missed!
Fantastic site!
Take a look at the Babe Ruth pic in the Yankee Stadium section. It shows him pitching. Is he pitchings for the Yanks or Braves? I can’t tell. I thought he only pitched for the Braves. Also, note it is the fat Babe, I thought he was thinner when he was a pitcher.
Biggest question, while I greatly enjoyed the Wrigley pics, WHY IS WRIGLEY IN THE GRAVEYARD!!!!!
it and Fenway are in the "Endangered Species list"
which is true, considering they are the only ballparks left of that era. Pity that cities wanted to go to multi sport stadiums like Old Busch, Three Rivers, etc. that had no aura or querks to it that Ebbets, Polo Grounds, and Cominskey had
#34: You'll be missed!
While the multi-use ovals are lame....
I have equal disdain for the current era of manufactured retro-quirkiness.
There is no need for a flagpole on a hill in CF. Someone’s going to get hurt on that thing someday, and I hope that it’s an Astro.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 3, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Ruth pitching
He pitched one game for the Yankees in both 1930 and 1933, and earned complete game victories in both. From the way he looks, I’m guessing the picture is from 1933 when he would have been about thirty-eight.
And that’s a wonderful site! I’m looking forward to checking it out at length when I have the time. Thanks for posting it Chanman!
by Mike Vails Evil Twin on Mar 28, 2009 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Ruth pitching
A few times, the Yankees forced Babe Ruth to pitch the final game of the season, as the starter, as a box office draw. They did it the first two years that he was on the team, after they’d either clinched or been eliminated, and then a couple more times late in his career. The Yankees would promote the heck out of it though Ruth hated it, and went on record as saying so. He was embarrassed by the results because he knew that he wasn’t much of a pitcher anymore.
Each pitching appearance, with the Yankees, is covered in detail in Robert Creamer’s biography of Ruth. Mostly, Creamer just quotes the Babe complaining about having to pitch…because Ruth did complain, loudly and publicly, to any reporter within earshot, whenever the Yankees asked him to take the mound.
"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko
by LaddieRenfroe on Apr 1, 2009 2:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Much as he claims to have hated it...
… he was 5-0 as a pitcher in a Yankee uniform, with four complete games.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
because its old
and all the publicity it got for the falling concrete a few years ago.
A good renovation will keep it running – at least in the physical aspect – for many more years. Economically its debatable how long Wrigley can run w/o huge revenue streams skyboxes generate.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
Metropolitan Stadium
appears as if it was built with an 1960’s erector set.
Looks like one guy with a screwdriver could dismantle the place.
The KC Muni pix were great — I have never seen good images of the park and I really don’t have any memory of TV games, outside of AFL Football.
I do remember some sort of signage on the bottom of the temporary football bleachers built on the outfield (ala Wrigley) that read in the Chiefs Red and Yellow — “The Chiefs welcome you to Kansas City” or something hokey like that….
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Mar 28, 2009 4:12 PM CDT reply actions
Metropolitan Stadium...
… was originally built in the mid 1950’s for one of the Mpls. area minor league teams, with the idea it could be expanded for major league baseball, and that’s exactly what happened.
In 1983, I was in Minnesota and happened by the site of the old park, which had been closed for over a year. A gate was open. I went in and took some photos. Eerie, huh?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I remember that post
I’m even in it….
But the erector set description looks even better seeing the remains of what were metal grandstands, like you would see at Spring parks….and HS Stadiums..
It was quite amazing that you could just walk in. You could have come in with tools, and taken seats out. The stadium memorabilia craze didn’t really get going until the 90s…
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Mar 28, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions
True.
I did take some things that I still have — some blank World Series ticket refund checks from the 1960’s.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
sheesh, very eerie indeed
Hard to believe it could look that crappy in two years time. I wonder what Wrigley would look like if they decided to just abandon it. I’m sure the grass would be that tall and the ivy may grow out of control onto the bleachers
#34: You'll be missed!
Rec'd
Centerfield at the Polo Grounds really seemed to be ahead of it’s time.
It’s cool to see all the spectators wearing full suits and bowler hats. If the Cubs did another throwback game, they ought to ask the fans to participate and dress the part. Although not during a day game in July haha.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
Nice Find!
Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.
Santo's high school
On the Sick’s Stadium page, second photo from the top, the large brick building beyond the lights standard is Franklin High School, where Ron Santo graduated. Unfortunately, I haven’t figured out where his home was, so I can’t say if that appears anywhere.
I would have loved to go to Ebbets Field.
If I had lived in New York, pre-1957, I have no doubt I would have been a Brooklyn Dodgers fan. I have no use for the L.A. Dodgers, and I felt that way long before the 2008 NLDS. But the old Brooklyn Dodgers, now that was something special. I feel like there are a lot of similarities about the old Brooklyn fans, and Cub fans, with their ballparks, their neighborhood, and their undying loyalty. Hey, they coined the phrase “Wait till next year” for God’s sake. I love the fact that they played the Yankees in five World Series, and lost all five, but then finally won. It’s a great story, and I think we, as Cub fans, can learn a lot from that. They persevered, and they finally won. And they were rewarded by having their hearts ripped out two years later.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
Most of those old stadiums probably would have been condemned by now
For as much work as Wrigley Field needs, it was kept up better than a lot of other parks were.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Mar 31, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions
Great site
Scrolling through the photos of current stadiums, its remarkable how much Fenway, Wrigley and even Dodger Stadium stand out. It’s uncanny how closely many of the newer stadiums resemble one another as they appear to follow the exact same formula: huge scoreboard with jumbotron, huge grandstand in right or left (or both), and a quirky gimmick that attempts to set one apart from all the rest (smokestacks in CIN, train/hill in HOU, old building in SD, pool in AZ, slide in MIL, rocks in ANA, etc.)
I understand the need to maximize revenue and all of the newer stadiums are superior venues in the absolute sense – improved sight lines, concession variety, etc for the fans and bigger clubhouses, training facilities for the players – but the newer stadiums, although flashy, seem rather soulless and interchangeable.
I’ve not been to all of the “newer” parks (only PNC, Chase, Petco, Great American and Nationals, plus Coors, Angels, Camden and Turner if you want to count those as new); how do places like Miller Park, Citizens Bank, AT&T and Safeco appear/feel in person?
Thats how I feel about Citi Field
It’s a remarkable facility but it’s just not the Mets, if you know what I mean. Your accustomed to thinking they play at Shea, but now it seems like they aren’t playing in their home ballpark. It’s much easier to think that for New Yankee considering its essentially the same stadium, but Shea…
#34: You'll be missed!
CBP and Petco
seem to be similar. Remove the Western Metals Building in SD, and the CF mini-bleachers with the sandbox — they are then remarkably similar (And the field dimensions, obviously are way different)
A T & T may be the best of them all, due to location.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Apr 9, 2009 2:28 PM CDT reply actions
Don't forget PNC.
PNC and Phone Holding Co. Ballpark in SF are my favorites of the new parks. Both blend into their surroundings perfectly, have excellent sightlines, and have spectacular views.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
the SF park, (ATT?)
to me, has a very strong Wrigley feel to it, even though its relatively new. And your right, the views on clear day are spectacular.



















