The Cubs in the 90s
Was that just a decade of bad or what for the most part?
What are some of everyone's favorte and least favorite moments?
1991 High hopes with the signings of Bell, Jackson and Smith. Who would have thought the biggest contributions Bell and Jackson would make would be the trades (Bell for Sosa and Jackson for Buechele) they made later involving them?
1992 Last year for Dawson and Maddux before his return. Mild contention but ultimate collapse. Arrival of Sammy Sosa. Dawson ending the season at 399 homeruns. Dunston injures his back before spring training the season after he had shown signs of finally reaching his potential.
Worst off season I can ever remember. Losing Dawson and Maddux if I remember correctly days apart, Signing a pile of crap except for Randy Myers.
1993 Late season surge made an 84 win team. Is it just me or does anyone else wonder what might have been that season if we kept Maddux and Dawson and still acquired Hibbard and Myers? Emergence of Sammy Sosa. Ryno breaks hand in spring training misses first month and is never the same.
1994 0-13 start at home. Tom Treblehorn's famous firehouse speech. Trachsel only pitcher to be able to find butt with both hands. Season mercifully ended by strike.
Major shakeup in front office brings in Andy MacPhail which brought us all hope but his barely mentioned in the sports section hire a few months later is the one who has done the most Jim Hendry.
Okay show of hands - anyone else ever wonder if things might have been different if MacPhail had just taken over and groomed Hendry and never had Lynch?
1995 Contention for wild card til last weekend of season. Late start because of strike. Decent season overall. But for many fans even for Cub fans was Cal breaking the record. Am I the only one who got goosepimples?
1996 Decent season but nothing to write home about until Sammy broke his hand. Some promising signs of potential contention but Sammy's injury ended all hope.
1997 the most forgettable of all with the 0-14 start. Biggest memory is Kaplan living in a truck outside Wrigley until they won. We were all hoping we'd see a certain prospect from Texas before the end of the season but he wasn't recalled.
1998 Need I say more? The wild card chase. 20 K game. 66 for Sosa. The one game playoff. If any of the first 3 had happened alone it would have made it special but all 3 happening together made it one of the most incredible rides we've ever had.
1999 Kerry goes down to start spring training. Promising start but early collapse. And will someone tell Sox fans that the Cubs were not in 1st when the Sox swept them (they were 1 game out)?
This was a decade when we were all atwitter about the likes of Kevin Roberson, Ozzie Timmons and Scott Bullet at one point or another.
MVP of the decade? Sosa.
Best pitcher of the decade? It's the tallest midget but probably Trachsel.
Best manager? I have to say Riggleman.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
49 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The 1990's....
as bad as they were, might have been a great decade but for one key event in the late ’80s, which altered the entire course of the franchise. And that was Dallas Green being forced out, and Gordy Goldsberry being shown the door shortly after that. If those two had just been allowed to do their thing, without the corporate interference, continue building the farm system, and build the Major League team around Sandberg, Dawson, Maddux, Grace, Dunston, et all, there is no doubt in my mind that the Cubs would have won a world championship, at least once, by now. No doubt whatsoever.
Having said that, with MacPhail playing the role of corporate bean counter from the GM’s office, and the farm system deteriorating into one of the worst, if not THE worst in all of baseball, the Cubs of the ‘90s really were no different than the state of the franchise in the 1950’s and early ’60s. It was a classic lesson in how not to run a Major League franchise, and how they managed even one playoff appearance, even with a team that overachieved big time, is beyond me.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
by ctcoff99 on Apr 19, 2009 5:19 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Good assessment overall
First off, I think that Riggleman, and to an extent Jim Lefebvre were pretty decent managers.
I do agree 100% with your statement re MacPhail and Lynch. Lynch was a terrible hire and was allowed to go on too long as a GM. MacPhail was not allowed to simply come in and be the GM as they had to give him a promotion to get him away from the Twins. The critical mistake of the MacPhail era was not tearing down and starting from scratch, as he seemingly has done with the Orioles. I think the O’s could be a pretty solid team in the future, especially if they develop some pitching. They have some good position prospects. But MacPhail and Co arrived and the situation was horrible and they didn’t make the tough decision to build from the ground up.
The pre-MacPhail stuff, I think, gets overlooked with MacPhail’s term is considered. The organization was a complete joke, with bozos like Trebelhorn looking foolish. Stanton Cook and Don Grenesko absolutely gutted the organization. There were a lot of people who had not so kind things to say about the organization and one thing that MacPhail did was professionalize it. Aside from Mark Grace, I cannot recall an ex Cub who has left the organization in the last decade and had a bad thing to say. I heard a great interview with Barry Rozner, who was the Cubs beat reporter at the time and while he certainly pointed out the failures of MacPhail, and there were failures, he did a lot to modernize the franchise and the front office.
I remember distinctly the day that MacPhail was hired
and, like most everybody, I was incredibly pumped that we finally had a baseball man being given “god-like power” over the ballclub. His success with Minnesota certainly made it look like he was the right guy to bring the Cubs out of their stasis.
Unfortunately, MacPhail was completely out of his element in trying to run a large market franchise. He consistently kept the budgets low and maintained one of the smallest scouting and front office staffs in baseball. He refused to do things like aggressively scout the pacific rim like so many other teams had started to do.
I’m currently reading George Castle’s book, “Sweet Lou and the Cubs” and there’s a line in there that other baseball GM’s referred to MacPhail’s office as “the place where new ideas go to die”.
I personally look at his tenure with the Cubs as a trainwreck that they’re only now starting to dig themselves out from.
Cubs did not lose Maddox, they chose.....
……not to sign him. Remember very well the front office rationalization that they could get two good pitchers, for the price of one very good pitcher, and that made more sense.
That is a perfect example of the “thinking” of the Cub front office at the time, penny wise, pound foolish. I was one of so many at the time who saw the failure to sign Maddox as a huge mistake, and that was knowing “only” that Maddox was a great pitcher, one of the best the Cubs ever had or would ever have, and not knowing, at the time, that he was a future Hall of Famer who would rack up over 300 wins and be one of the five top pitchers in MLB in the 90s.
I forget now, and I am sure someone here does know and will post it, who the Cubs got to fill the loss of Maddox, but I do recall neither of them turned out to be anything more than journeymen pitchers who were at best, average, and not long with the Cubs.
Jose Guzman and Greg Hibbard were Maddux's "replacements"
Obviously Himes’ master plan worked like a charm.
I was also on record at the time as saying letting Maddux go would go down with the Lou Brock trade as the worst moves in Cubs’ history.
I still remember going to opening day in ’93 and how depressing it was watching Maddux throw a shutout against us.
What made me (and still makes me) really angry was that Maddux wanted to sign with the Cubs but because he didn’t accept their offer by a certain point, they took it off the table. Sheer idiocy on the part of the Cubs and Larry Himes.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 19, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions
story I heard, cannot say if it is just that or true
The Cubs front office gave Maddux until midnight CST “x” date to sign the contract. Maddux was in Hawaii and signed the contract but it was received after midnight CST so the Cubs rejected the contract.
Agains I do not know if this is true or just BS.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I never heard that he actually signed the contract but...
…it wouldn’t shock me considering the way the front office operated in those days.
The bottom line though is that Maddux wanted to stay with the Cubs and for some bizarre reason they decided to try to make him squirm.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions
Sandberg talks of this in his book..
Maddux agreed to the contract shortly after deadline but it was pulled off the table by then.
We're born again, there's new grass on the field. -John Fogerty
That might have been one of the places where I read it
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions
That's the story I remember hearing.
Jessica should be along soon to give us the accurate story.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
with a copy of the contract :=)
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I remember blue’s story being pretty accurate but I agree Jessica is the best source of all things Maddux. She might even know his shoe size!
Jay is our Quarterback. I REPEAT JAY IS OUR QUARTERBACK. Did I mention we have a Quarterback who happens to be named Jay?.
by puckishcubsfan on Apr 20, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
1974-1983
That was a worse 10-year period for the Cubs with 9 losing seasons and only 1 .500 season in 1977. The Cubs would have finished over .500 in 1977 and 1979, if it hadn’t been for epic collapses at the end of those seasons.
"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray
You were a Cubs fan then ..
.. when being a Cubs fan wasn’t cool
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
It was always cool to me
But, yeah, growing up during the 1970’s, I remember getting a lot of flack at school for my “Cubs love”.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions
very nice post
rec’d
I didn't get the players I wanted in the offseason!! Hopefully I get what I want in the Regular Season---The World Series Trophy!! Go Cubbies!!
1995 Cubs
I suppose I have to count them as a contending team. They finished 4 games out of a wild card spot. They were only 2 out with 2 to play. I never really thought that team had much of a chance to make it to the playoffs. They were only 73-71.
"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray
That team won 8 in a row the last week of the season to get into contention.
Here’s the kicker. Had the NL still been divided into East and West only in 1995, the Cubs would have been NL East champions at 73-71. Look it up. They were the only team among the old NL East teams to finish over .500. (The Braves, who won the NL East in 1995, were in the NL West before divisional realignment. The Mets finished 2nd at 69-75, tied with the Phillies.)
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
After 5+ years of bland and bad, seeing
some success over the ’98 season was fun, but that play in game versus SF was amazing.
That brief, 48 hours(?), of joy before the first loss to the Braves almost made up for the preceding bad seasons.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
the 1998 team
was a fun one to watch, but classic example of playing over your heads. I feel for Riggleman, he was a better mgr than people give credit IMO and that team was the “best” group of players he was given.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I also felt like the 1999 team....
quit on Riggs once they started that out-of-control losing streak in June that may or may not have begun with being swept at home by the White Sox. I remember they were never the same after that. By the second half of the season, that entire team, except for Mark Grace of course, had basically given up and thrown in the towel. It was a horrific way to end an overall bad decade. Of course, the 2000 group was just as bad.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
I blame Ed Lynch for 1999
For thinking that Gaetti had enough left to be the every day third baseman, for refusing to release Lance Johnson when Riggleman asked him to, for continuing to expect a 20-year-old (in the offseason, anyway) to be the staff ace and for generally being a pompous ass.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 20, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions
God, you're bringing back memories I've tried to repress!
We caught lightning in a bottle with Gaetti over the last month or so of 1998 but I knew we were in trouble when they decided to go into the next year with him as starting third baseman.
Typical of the MacPhail/Lynch regime; hoping to find designer clothes at the bottom of the bonus bin.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions
The Cubs have had some bad guys running the team in the past, but those
two clowns had to rank with the worst. They had a pretty decent team in ’98 (through no fault of their own) and proceeded to ruin any chance the team had of building on that year. What a fiasco.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 20, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Oddly enough...
… the 1999 team was 32-23, nine games over .500 and only 1 game out of first place on June 8. They looked at the time as if they’d continue to contend.
While it might have been folly to think that Gaetti would repeat his two months of 1998, I don’t think anyone on June 8, 1999 would have predicted the Cubs would go 35-74 the rest of the year.
They definitely quit on Riggleman the last two months; they were 19-42 after August 1.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Al, just looking at the numbers
in those last 109 games to play 39 games under is amazing. I remember that season, a great start and then TOTAL collapse/quit, especially after all the excitement of the year before. IIRC, I basically quit watching them in July, I was so sickened.
"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse
MacPhail would have been ok if he'd picked a direction
Either blow it up and start over or spend a lot of cash to win right away. He tried to do both halfway.
Himes is up there among the worst, too . . . .
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 21, 2009 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions
I think the main problem with MacPhail was
…that he had a small market approach but was running a large market franchise.
He couldn’t quite bring himself to blow the whole thing up and start over because, among other things, he felt pressure from fans and ownership to win asap and so we were stuck with his “temporarily patching holes in a leaky boat” approach (see the Gary Gaetti move).
by bluekoolaide on Apr 21, 2009 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions
He shouldn't have felt pressure from the fans
At that point in time, most of us would have accepted 3-5 years of complete crap if there was a plan in place to be consistently in contention. We’d already lived through years of crap with no apparent plan.
Instead, we got years of mediocrity with no plan.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 21, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions
I have been comparing Edmonds to Gaetti
in the pick up last season and what he likely would contribute this season to us.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
It's not a bad approximation
Although Gaetti wasn’t platooning
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 21, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Remember Gary Scott?
The most over-hyped Cubs prospect ever.
Other 90s players to remember (or not); Doug Dascenzo (now managing in the Padres system), Julio Zuleta (remember him in the outfield searching for a ball while the batter completes an inside-the-park hr?), and or course Hector Villanova (as Harry called him). Hector actually was a pretty good receiver, couldn’t throw though. If I recall, Maddux liked throwing to him.
"We gotta circle the bandwagons." - Devin Hester
I actually remember being in the bleachers one night when Scott, after...
fouling off what seemed like a dozen pitches, hit a grand slam. Definitely the highlight of his very short Cubs career.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions
The problem with Gary Scott was...
… that he was rushed to the majors after having ONE good spring, having played only 35 games above A-ball.
If he had been allowed to have a normal progression through the minor leagues, maybe he’d have become a decent player. We’ll never know.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Absolutely
The hype machine that spring was completely out of control. I remember he was suddenly, after not even playing a game in the majors, being annointed as Ron Santo’s heir apparent.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 21, 2009 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions
And Gary's heir apparent was Kevin Orie
At least Orie did have a decent rookie year, but too much hype for him, too.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 21, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Other Cubs of the 90's who I'll never forget...
(although I’d defintely like to)…Dave Smith…signed as a free agent to be the Cubs closer in ’91. He did a great job…if you compare him to Mel Rojas…another Cubs free agent aquisition who is probably my own personal choice as our WORST CLOSER EVER.
And I’m surprised that nobody’s brought up Tuffy Rhodes…when he hit the three homers off of Dwight Gooden on opeing day ‘94, I remember telling my friend that we weren’t so much witnessing the beginning of one career as we were the ending of another (Gooden’s).
The 90s pretty much shaped my fandom
OMG those were some awful seasons! Grace, Sandberg, Dawson, Dunston, Maddux and a bunch of roster fill. Always hoping for an over-.500 finish, always hoping for kids like Gary Scott and Derrick May and Shawn Boskie to turn into big-league talent, always being let down.
At the time I wasn’t aware of the bureaucratic BS that was going down but no doubt it was the main reason why the Cubs stumbled during the 90s. First the Cook/Madigan/Grenesko crowd exploiting the team to turn a profit, then Andy “Fiscally Responsible” MacPhail putting principle over pennants. How it would gall me to hear him say “I just hate wasting a season” as he refused a wholesale rebuilding and opting for catching lightning in a bottle year after year. Phooey.
I’m SO glad John McDonough and Crane Kenney are running the club properly and ownership has loosened the pursestrings. Once Tom Ricketts takes full control and the seeds that Tim Wilken has sown begin bearing fruit, things will really be great!
The 1990's were indeed a black hole of a decade for the Cubs
At least in the 80’s we had a couple of division titles and, even when we were bad it seemed like we had a lot of exciting, young talent being developed throughout the system (thank you Dallas Greene and Gordon Goldsberry).
by bluekoolaide on Apr 20, 2009 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions
"1991 High hopes with the signings of Bell, Jackson and Smith."
That was a great lead in sentence, I nearly spewed my morning coffee on to my IMac screen, while reading those names.
I have to double check
I have to double check when I get home the math but early calculations for the Cubs to match the 1990-1999 winning percentage in 2000-2009 they only have to win 66 games.
Jay is our Quarterback. I REPEAT JAY IS OUR QUARTERBACK. Did I mention we have a Quarterback who happens to be named Jay?.
And consider ...
That the Cubs were terrible in 2000, 2002 and 2006.
Guys its even worse
I calculated out 1994 and 1995 based on winning percentages of the shortened seasons as to how they would have done in 162 games. 71 wins in 94 and 83 in 95.
Calculated out that means 761 wins in the 90s.
So far in the 00s the Cubs have won 724 games. So if they only win 37 this year they will equal that.
Jay is our Quarterback. I REPEAT JAY IS OUR QUARTERBACK. Did I mention we have a Quarterback who happens to be named Jay?.
thanks for the reminder of how much that decade sucked
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
ahhh, the 90s.......
That was a bad decade all right. Larry Himes had to be the worst GM in the history of the Cubs, except maybe for Wid “Miksis will fix us” Mathews. Though I will admit that Lynch didnt do that much better. Riggleman doesnt get the recognition he deserves and Lefebvre was actually halfway decent. I actually stopped watching baseball in 1995 because I was pissed about the strike, but I came back when Sammy Sosa made his first run at the HR record in 1996 and the Cubs were actually in contention. I remember when Frank Castillo was considered one of their best pitchers(boy that was a bad year!) and when it looked like Jeremi Gonzalez was going to be a world beater. How about Chico Walker coming back a couple of times? Or the parade of 3rd Basemen(Steve Buechele, anyone?) But letting Dawson, Maddux and Sutcliffe all go was the lowest point of the decade.
How bad were the 90's for the Cubs?
A friend recently reminded me that we were actually excited the day we traded for Steve Buechele!
by bluekoolaide on Apr 27, 2009 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions

by 


















