Soriano calls out Cubs effort...and DLee disagrees. Surprised?
In today's SunTimes, link below:
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/1549148,CST-SPT-cub29.article
Soriano calls out the Cubs for their lack of effort, basically saying, "you can't just play 9 innings and expect to win, you have to want it." Lou tended to agree while DLee was quoted as saying, "I don't see it." The DLee response does not surprise me.
First, it is nice to finally see SOMEONE step up and take a leadership role on this team. I think this has been lacking for the last three years. No one seemed to speak up, as the team seemed to have a "leadership by example" attitude. This has always troubled me when the team needed to fight through lulls.
I am glad that Fonzi has put his leather jacket on and is ready to kick some butt. Henry Winkler would be proud!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
2 recs |
78 comments
Comments
I have no idea who the leader in the clubhouse is. I'm not there.
But Lee has been voted captain before (I think), and Soriano usually leads with his bat and glove. Both styles can be effective. I don’t care which as long as we win.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Apr 29, 2009 10:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I side with Alfonso Soriano on this one
Frankly, I’m sick and tired of Derrek Lee and his gentlemanly ways. Somebody has needed to light a fire under his ass for a long time.
Soriano is a new player this season. As long-standing critic of his I must say that I am dutifully impressed with his focus and intensity so far this season. Combined with Milton Bradley maybe the two of them can be the shoe up the ass that this Cub team has so desperately needed for a long time.
For those not bright enough to grasp the fundamental underpinning of a message board, please take note that "EVERYTHING I state is an OPINION."
by BLou on Apr 29, 2009 11:00 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
There's nothing like a nice leathered-up shoe being shoved directly up my ass.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Apr 29, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They made a HUGE mistake
killing him off. I would have loved to see Red & Jack as a team for the next five or six seasons!
“WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR???”
“DUMBASS!”
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Apr 29, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You forgot
“IT’S THE ONLY OPTION!”
Oh, and I assume that Sen. Mayer was revived off-screen after Jack left the room. He’ll be back.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahah Tony style!
"What is he doing!?"
-Doug Collins
by TyCubsfan on Apr 29, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haven't you heard? The big villain for next season will be
Edgar.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
am i the only one...
… who finds that name really funny? Senator Mayor??
I've told you a million times never to exaggerate!!
by pscrblazer on Apr 29, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's almost as funny as
Agent Walker.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agent Walker
Might end up killing Tony at some point for the stunts that he’s pulling and for killing her one love, and almost (I haven’t watched this weeks episode yet) killing her crush.
by airmidget1 on Apr 29, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus...
The actress playing Agent Walker makes Elisha Cuthbert look like a booger.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Apr 29, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Millikin
Agent Walker is from my college.
by airmidget1 on Apr 29, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunno --
I’d opt for the, uh, booger. But both women are easy on the eyes.
by cubmudgeon on Apr 30, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clarence Boddicker?
remember
Sammy Jankis
by neverAcquiesce on Apr 29, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There’s nothing like a nice leathered-up shoe being shovedshoved directly up my ass.
Fixed that for ya…
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
argh.
stuffed fail…
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Y'know, I'm starting to come around to your way of thinking about DLee.
Let me make clear: I still respect Derrek and want to see him do well. But Alfonso Soriano is clearly the winner in this quotational cage match.
Another thing that’s really been bothering me about DLee is revealed – or at least implied – in this blogpost by Bruce Levine. To wit:
The Cubs’ first baseman feels you must go out and honor your contract even if you might not do well in the process.
Now, I don’t know how much credit to give Bruce Levine. Honestly, the overall point of that post is idiotic: That DLee is somehow a better player than Milton Bradley because he goes out on the field injured – and struggles – rather than getting himself as close to 100% health as possible. Levine actually writes:
You can hate the results, but admire the player.
Um, no, Bruce. I can hate the results and grow increasingly irritated with the player.
But, that aside, if DLee is refusing a DL stint just to “honor his contract,” he’s MISSING THE POINT OF HIS CONTRACT. He’s not here to play X number of games; he’s here to PROVIDE OFFENSIVE PRODUCTION (and defensive, too, of course). If he needs to sit for two weeks to have neck/back treatments that will enable him to HIT LINE DRIVES AND FLY BALLS, then he should do so – immediately and without hesitation.
We don’t need DLee on the field and at the plate. We need THE GOOD DLee on the field and at the plate.
Rant over.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 29, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 7 recs
Good post
This is one of the things we don’t know about Lee – how much injuries have held him back. I have a hard time believing that a very fit man like Derrek Lee is in decline already. I think it is much more likely that he’s banged up and playing through it. He’s the anti-Bradley in this way.
It’s ironic, then, that you suggest he’s missing the point of his contract. I think there’s a middle ground between Lee and Bradley and the middle ground is that we need both playing as close to 100% in October as possible.
Personally, I’d rather have Lee’s attitude and a manager who stands up to that player and sits him down than a player like, say, Erik Bedard is rumored to be, who sits himself down and takes that choice away from the manager. On the other hand, you have players, like Franklin Morales, who try and play through the pain and don’t tell the club, who is then left wondering, “Why does this guy suddenly stink?”
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more...
I think Lee may be taking the “play through it” stance too far. He’s made it clear he wants to play every day so long as he can walk, but perhaps he’s not seeing the forest for the trees. Perhaps a trip to the DL would do him good. Maybe it wouldn’t, but it definitely seems like injuries might be derailing his career. And if he’s simply gutting it out, well, that’s stupid and detrimental to the team (especially with Hoffpauir hitting well).
by SouthernCub on Apr 29, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The main point being, with Hoffpauir doing well.
This is a luxury, we should used him at 1st and let Lee get some rest. Did you see him dive for that bunt towards 1st yesterday? He’s not healthy, he should have had that and I think Hoff would have napped it.
by smash! on Apr 30, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
I think Lee is saying he’s healthy when he’s really not. And if he is (and if that’s affecting his play), then he’s honoring his contract to the detriment of the team.
by SouthernCub on Apr 30, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not one to cheer and wish for an injury
but I hope he is hurt, becuse if he is 100% healthy we are in trouble
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's an acceptable hope...
It’s not like you’re hoping that a healthy Lee will get hurt. You’re hoping that a struggling Lee is struggling because he’s hurt. Big difference. I share your hope on this one.
by SouthernCub on Apr 30, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I would concede the point that...
…it’s the very rare player who’s 100% healthy – even in April. But if an injury is substantially impeding a player’s performance, he should set aside the “play through anything” mentality and get as close to 100% as possible in the hopes of putting up the numbers he was signed to produce.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need more green in this post.
How long should we give sig lines at the bottom of the comments?
Bradley watch -- out 7 games of 20
by znohitter on Apr 29, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, all, for greening my post.
Again, I don’t want to make this a DLee “hate” thing. I respect him. He’s brought a lot of joy to Cubs fans in his time here. But his quiet and steady approach to the game appears to be keeping him from getting the rest and medical attention he needs to hit the baseball effectively. (And who knows what effect its having on his defense.) If that is truly the case, I am not pleased.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
terrific post Daver....
….you have clarifed the thoughts that I have on this subject and didnt have the time or skill to put into words today!
New sig currently under construction
by JB 23 on Apr 30, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, thanks!
I guess I should rant more often.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what you get with Lee...
…he has a little Dusty Baker in him in that he will always error towards protecting guys. I’m not saying it’s right or wrong (or it will have any impact on whether they win or not), but that is what you get with Lee.
Their slow start does not surprise me in the least. Everybody had them penciled in for the playoffs after two division titles, and we all know it ain’t that easy in baseball. I’m not saying the Cubs won’t make the playoffs, because they probably will, but all you have to do is look at Detroit from last year to see how things can look a certain way on paper, and then completely differently on the field. Also, two straight divsion titles probably has created a sense that they can coast a bit and still win the division (complacency).
It’s a long long year, and this team has not come close to gelling as of yet. One thing that does scare me are the Cards. I recall 04 when everyone had the Cubs winning the division and the Cards just played their asses off the whole year. Duncan and LaRussa (in that order), just have a way of making chicken salad………
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Apr 30, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but let's not forget...
…that 2004 team had a ton of flaws. Dusty basically letting the players run the team and allowing them to get “soft” (example, the pissing matches players had toward Chip and Steve because of criticism toward the team or praise toward opposing players).
You do make excellent points though, and frankly I’m nitpicking with the 2004 comment (I grew to absolutely despise that team at season’s end and don’t want to have to do that this year). So kudos to your post.
As far as Soriano’s remarks go, frankly I’m thrilled to see the guy taking over as the leading voice of this team because Lord knows Derrek Lee hasn’t been that voice in awhile. He DOES have Dusty in him to where he feels the need to defend the players and protect them, but when your team is 10-10 and got killed in two of the three games in their last series, something needs to be said, which Soriano did.
And if this were last year I wouldn’t be praising him like this because for the last two years I was a serious critic of his. But his bat is doing most of the talking this season and frankly, I’m thrilled to see this progress. He can’t be the only one hitting the ball out of the park though (or getting on base, for that matter). These guys need to step it up, I don’t care how early in the year it is. It’s too early to panic, but it’s never too early to become concerned and begin to wonder where this team is headed.
When it comes to Lee, I could care less what he’s done in the past. I respect the guy tremendously and tremendously admired his offensive abilities from 2004 up until halfway through 2007 when I noticed a decline. Since then, I’ve been a heavy critic of his, and for him to disagree with Soriano making a, to me, necessary comment to give the guys a bit of a kick in the ass, is a bit foolish if you ask me. Especially if he’s technically one of the guys Soriano’s talking about.
I never thought I’d cringe or expect Derrek Lee to be an out in the lineup, sadly that’s what’s come of the guy with me. Whether he’s playing hurt or he’s just lost it, I don’t know, but he’s the guy who’s going to have to fix it. As far as I’m concerned, the way he’s been playing so far this year, he’s not doing that.
We need a vocal leader, not a clubhouse leader. A clubhouse leader motivates the team on the inside, which is what Lee does, and he obviously was never one to openly criticize players. These guys need open criticism in the press and the news, and that’s what Soriano has just done. I hope we see more comments like that if the slump continues (which I’m hoping does not happen), and he keeps talking with the bat as well.
by AeroZach on Apr 30, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
or Lee is down playing it cuz he is being critizied
by so many for not producing as expected so far this season
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well... it's nice that someone on the team is expressing their disappointment to the media.
But, I’m not sure how much that’s gonna help, if they keep botching up the fundamentals.
There have been a couple instances where it looked like the Cubs were disinterested or sleepwalking though… and not surprisingly, Soriano was one of them.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
.
by SackMan on Apr 29, 2009 11:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My take
I respect Lee as a baseball player and as a human being. That said, I am glad to see someone taking a vocal leadership role – a position that has been lacking the last two years. I have written about this in the past, that there was no guy who seemed to have the passion to be this leader. I admit surprise to the fact that it was Soriano who stepped up here, but it pleases me.
Lee just seems to be a mellow, laid back, languid guy. He goes and plays the game, never gets too high, never gets too low. There is much to be said for consistency and even temper. But at the same time as a fan, I would like to see some passion and fire too.
Ladies and gentlemen! It's 1985 all over again, but this time the offense goes to hell!
by Ross on Apr 29, 2009 11:27 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
have to agree- i’ve never seen Lee get too emotional, which I always felt was a good thing (and it is). Besides the Chris Young fight and a rare slammed bat, he is the consummate professional and I always appreciated that in him.
That said, this team also needs fire and I’m glad someone called it out- it shouldn’t always have to be Lou. Seeing the Fonz do it is a surprise though- but a good one.
Attitudes like this are a good complement to guys like Demp and Lilly in the clubhouse.
by cubfan1982 on Apr 29, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 times two...
… never woulda expected this from Sori, which makes it all the more important and all the cooler IMHO.
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end"
by AndrewJStone on Apr 29, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
D-Lee isn't exactly a sparkplug
He seems like the kind of guy who would downplay everything, win or lose. Have you ever seen or heard an interview with him? It puts me to sleep listening to how low key he is. Not that it’s a bad thing. But the response doesn’t surprise me at all.
by daeviant on Apr 29, 2009 11:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how different the response to this article would be
if D-Lee and Soriano had started the season with the stats they had back in April 2008.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 12:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My take is simple
Soriano has the right to speak up about the teams play (and he seems to be agreeing with many gme threads). If DLee and others dont like what he said, there is one good way to stop it from being mentioned, win and play hard from the opening pitch untili time to head home. Last October vs LAD, we saw no fire in the team (Soriano included) and I have no problem with the highest paid player opening his mouth about it.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 12:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice to see Lee disagree, apparently his effort has been outstanding so far
Lets Go Hawks!
by CubsBall2202 on Apr 29, 2009 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
only if your "role model"
is Mario Mendoza.
Get with it DLee! If you want to lead by example, Mendoza can’t be your role model.
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 29, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aside from believing he's a legitimate clubhouse leader............
……….far too many of us have expected the 2005 version of Derrek Lee to be the standard issue at the plate.
Just as his offense that season was an aberration, I suspect our hopes for him playing a strong leadership role are falsely rooted.
Rant on, Sori. This teams needs a kick in the ass.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
by tville on Apr 29, 2009 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think most of us knew that was a career year.
If he could even get back to his 2004 level, that’d be great.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 29, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we expected the 2005 D-Lee.
I think that we, and the Cubs, expected something more than D-Lee’s pre-05 career averages and his 2005 breakout year.
Instead, they’ve gotten a lost season (through no part of Lee’s own), followed by a decent, career-average year, and two-plus seasons of decline.
There’s just no way that the Cubs would have made the kind of investment they did in Lee if they’d known he’d revert to his pre-2005 self as a hitter. The fact that he’s actually worse than that is just the kicker.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 29, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edit for clarity
I think that the Cubs expected Lee to produce somewhere between his pre-05 averages and his 2005 career year.
Of course, he has not only reverted to his career averages – he’s actually producing below them.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 29, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee's always been more of a "lead by example" kind of guy
He’s a solid, respected professional but he’ll never be the fiery, leader type that clubs occasionally need. This isn’t a criticism-it jut seems to be his personality.
Anyway, good for Soriano for speaking up and trying to kick guys in the butt a little bit.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 29, 2009 2:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good for Sori for speaking his mind, but this bashing of Lee for not
being fiery is a bunch of crap. What is this football? Since when did a player have to be fired up to play baseball. There are thousands of examples of players with tempraments like Lee’s who have been successful at the game. Being fired up has nothing to do with it. If that is your personality, fine. So be it, but don’t put down Lee for being who he is.
This business of being excited because a guy is running around banging his fist into lockers is just misdirected energy. Not everyone has to be all geeked up to be successful. A leader doesn’t have to go around screaming and kicking trash cans. Lee didn’t ask to be the leader of this team. It’s silly to bash a guy for being something he isn’t.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 29, 2009 3:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Disagree...
Being fiery is not a bunch of crap. You are right in saying that you can be both fiery and you can walk softly and carry a big stick and still be successful.
I think the point you are missing from most of the people here (myself included), is that what this team needs and has needed for the last 2+ seasons is that guy to “light a fire” under the rest of the team. That’s not to say Lee cannot be a leader, it is just a response to what seems to have been lacking from this team in 07, 08, and 09.
This team has been fun to watch over the last 2+ years and they HAVE been good enough to go further than they have. IMO, what the have needed is someone in the clubhouse to say, “LET’S F***ING DO THIS!” (Edited for the sensitive)
by jbertram on Apr 29, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being fiery is vastly overrated. Just because a guy goes around screaming and running into
walls doesn’t make him a good ballplayer.
I’m not missing your point. I just fail to see the significance of it. Why is it when the team is winning and no one if “fiery”, no one says anything? Could it be that that trait is unnecessary to playing good winning baseball? You make it seem like the players don’t want to be successful or can’t be successful unless someone is running around the field screaming like a banshee. What does that have to do with hitting, pitching or playing good defense. The players aren’t stupid. They can see the score. They know they are playing like crap. They don’t need someone running around telling them that like they are in some kind of stupor.
I’d much rather see a well-pitched ball game, a consistent offensive output and some good defense. That is the formula for winning baseball. It’s simple. You throw the ball, you hit the ball, you catch the ball. GOT IT!!!!
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 29, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Being firey doesn’t mean running into walls and it’s a stretch to call it vastly overrated. The season is 160 games plus playoffs. As we have shown the past two years by coming out flat and looking uninspired on our way to getting swept that it takes more than just skill to make it through and win the whole thing. Also when it comes to the playoffs they have been in some kind of stupor. A getting swept straight out stupor while they stand around waiting for someone to tell them that the playoffs have started.
It’s not necessary to have a guy who runs into walls screaming like a banshee, but that is not what I take firey to mean. I think it is more than obvious that in professional sports just going out and playing doesn’t always get the job done. Sometimes more is needed.
by Villeslgr on Apr 29, 2009 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is overrated. Where the Dodgers more fiery that the Cubs last year or
did they pitch and hit better? I don’t recall seeing Manny running around in the dugout screaming at guys and giving them a swift kick in the butt. These guys are professionals. They do this for a living. This isn’t high school or college. If you need someone else to motivate you to win the World Series, you have other problems. Winning a championship is the ultimate goal and a professional athlete should have the self-motivation to acomplish that goal. You can’t get it from the guy next to you. It has to come from within.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 29, 2009 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this 100 percent
“Firey” is overrrated. Does anybody really think yelling and screaming is going to make that much of a difference with professional athletes?
People say this about the Bears all the time. “Oh, if they had someone as firery as Ditka, they’d be better.” No, they just need better players who play to their potential.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Apr 30, 2009 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but
The point at hand is whether having that passion is part of how you play to your potential.
For some players, getting fired up clouds their judgment and increases their chance of making mistakes. For others, it’s absolutely necessary for them to be able to focus.
For some players, seeing that passion in their teammates will inspire them. For others, it will grate on them and you may end up with a fight on your hands.
I think good teams have a mix of both, and everything in between.
And for the record, I think there’s a difference between wearing your heart on your sleeve and showing people up or beating down water coolers. You can get fired up, but tantrums and disrespecting the game should not be tolerated, much less encouraged. It’s the reason I can’t watch professional football. I hate seeing grown men acting like spoiled children.
by redward on Apr 30, 2009 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
I also agree with those above who said that the reason the Cubs lost wasn’t because they lacked “fire”. It also wasn’t because they didn’t have enough LH hitters.
They just played three bad games at the worst possible time. It can happen to any team.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and LAD
pitched three well pitched games, give them their credit as well
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right.
Lou & Jim completely overreacted, and the result is this not-well-constructed roster.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trading DeRosa was too cute by half.
I almost wonder if it was done simply so that Hendry could use the “better to trade someone a year too early than a year too late” line at cocktail parties.
He only had this year left on his contract, and he was an incredibly useful player. I think that Lou and Hendry really, really overthought this offseason and wound up making counterproductive move after counterproductive move.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 30, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
Just like in April and May, a team can have a bad 3-game stretch in October. I don’t think the team was incapable of winning in October last year. I just think they didn’t play well, and picked a bad time to do it.
I think we still have a very capable team with loads of talent. But I don’t think it’s as good a team as last year’s team – especially when you consider the amount of added risk taken on for this year’s team. The lineup is better than last year’s lineup when Bradley is healthy and worse when he’s not. The rotation is better when Harden is healthy, and worse if/when he’s not. The bullpen is probably not as good as last year’s bullpen.
If Bradley and Harden can stay relatively healthy, this team is probably better than last year’s. But the organization definitely took a big roll of the dice, and I think they rolled the dice largely as an overreaction to a bad three games.
by SouthernCub on Apr 30, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Well stated and rec'd.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Although I do think that some of the late season strategy on the part of Lou played into the poor showing the playoff games. (Obviously the onus is on the players). I think that having the division wrapped up so early last year hurt the cubs a bit in the playoffs..I hope they can wrap up the division early again this year, but continue with the momentum into the playoffs.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed with most - not the rotation bit
Harden was a Cub for nearly 1/2 of last season.
If you want to compare it to pre-Harden 2008, well — that would be Sean Gallagher. I think it’s no worse than 2008 if one pitcher is out.
Dempster won’t be as good as he was, but he won’t be as bad as he was yesterday, either.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 30, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The rotation is as follows:
Last year:
Zambrano
Dempster (the really good version)
Lilly
Marquis
Hill/Gallagher/Marshall/Harden (12 starts)
This year:
Zambrano
Dempster (probably won’t be as good as last year)
Lilly
Marshall
Harden
If Harden stays healthy, it’s probably a better staff (especially if Dempster maintains his 2008 form). If Harden does not stay healthy, it could be a substantially worse staff (especially if Dempster returns to old form).
by SouthernCub on Apr 30, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I’m not considering fiery as simply running around giving swift kicks to the butt. I consider it as giving extra appropriate for the situation. Which if you are in the playoffs there is no excuse to look as poorly as we have the past two years. I feel there are certain situations where it takes more than just being professional.
Professional athlete or not they are still human and people respond to different situations in different ways.
by Villeslgr on Apr 30, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
DLee’s quiet and steady, Zen-like approach to the game doesn’t bother me. Some good leaders are like that. My only concern, as noted above, is that this attitude is driving him to stay in games and stay off the DL even though he’s not in an adequate physical condition to play up to his potential.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Bradley’s “fiery,” and how’s that working out for everyone?
"I'll take one in the mouth over the eyes any day". - AJ Pierzynski
http://lostinthevines.blogspot.com/
by lostinthevines on May 1, 2009 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bradley's doing
just fine.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 1, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too many on this thread are confusing "fiery" with passion.
Dempster is a leader with humor. Different guys do it in different ways, but they get to the guys on the team and keep them focused and interested in the ultimate goal.
I think many of us here worry that DLee often comes across as a guy who “punches the time clock.” Come out every day and play the 162 games and collect the pay check (whether his health is good or not). For instance, when Stoney was making negative comments or fans boo, DLee thinks the answer is “to get in line” not to examine if the opposing views MIGHT be correct. This is a guy who lives in his little box and doesn’t want to get outside it. Not only is that NOT a leader, it is a guy who is stubbornly set in his ways.
So I am happy about guys who keep the team focused on staying alert and trying to play well and trying to stretch themsleves, but I don’t care if it is through fire or laughter—I just want to see a pulse and the neurons firing.
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 12:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you do a great disservice to Derrick Lee. Basically you are criticizing a guy for being who
he is. Not every individual is the fiery type that yells and has a rah rah type of personality. Different people express themselves different ways. Just because he doesn’t conform to your description of what a ballplayer should be, doesn’t mean he has any less fire or dessn’t care as much.
Your comment about punching the time clock was particularly galling. Derrick Lee has had some awful big performances in a Cub uniform. When he was performing better, there were no complaints about his lack of desire or not having enough fire. I suspect that many of the negative comments have more to do with his lack of production as opposed to his lack of intensity.
We know very little about what goes on inside of the guys. We spectulate on why they perform the way they do, but in actuality, we really don’t know what we are talking about. To spectulate on a players lack of desire when he has shown no evidence of it, is at best disengenious and at worse a lie.
I don’t know what motivates these guys. I don’t know them personally and I don’t know what goes on in their personal lives that can manifest itself on the field. I do know that if the roles were reversed, DLee wouldn’t have the slightest idea of what makes me tick. So for me to claim that he is not a good leader or what he wants to get inside or outside is pure speculation. I don’t complain about his motivation because he is batting under .200. I only hope that he regains his stroke and can become a contributing member of the team.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 30, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't get me wrong, when I said he "punches the time clock"
what I meant is that he seems to use as a measure of his success that he gets out there and plays everyday, period. that seems to be one measure of his success. I personally think that is selfish. This is just my opinion based on what I see. You can have your opinion too.
There are times a player needs to sit and heal and he in the long-run, can do his team more good. Sometimes, guys are insecure. No one acted this way more than Brett Favre—and he was a GREAT competitor but he was also selfish (I am a Packer fan so I know what I am talking about as I lived through those frustrations when Favre wouldn’t sit).
I also gave examples of where DLee seems to never like criticism of the team, period. I just think DLee is set in his ways. This may be DLee’s way of having quiet passion, but I also think he is not as young as he used to be and when injuries like this neck flare up, you are better to let it heal completely—take a few more days. Did you ever see him look as bad as he did yesterday in fielding that bunt? We need a healthy DLee out there if he is going to play. His is one position where we do have a decent (not great) fielding back up (Hoff) to fill in while he gets better.
So don’t accuse me of lying. I am only offering observations and opinions. Let’s relax.
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't meant as an accusation. My only point is that we really don't
know what is in another person’s heart. We speculate and guess, but we really don’t know. Some players get very defensive when people attempt to throw a teamate under the bus. There is a sense of unity with a team and when someone from the outside attempts to call question to a teammate, players get defensive. It’s very difficult for those outside to understand, but that is what binds a team together.
On the subject of his health, you make a very good point about whether he should be playing. It’s a fine line. Players don’t want to be accused of dogging it. But if a guy is toughing it out for the team or just attempting to keep a streak alive, the decision needs to be made to have the guy sit. That’s an extremely touchy area from some managers and coaches. Unless a guy is missing a limb, some managers will let the player make the decision. We even applaud that behavior. When Willis Reed limped out on the court on one leg, the crowd went nuts. If there is no viable alternative to the player in question, we tend to take a guy at some percentage of his performance rather that not at all. If DLee were batting .350 now with 20 RBI, we probably wouldn’t be having this discussion. As you said, having Hoff available and healthy makes the option of sitting DLee extremely viable.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Apr 30, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























