The Myth of Derrek Lee's Decline
All across this site, you can read posts confidently stating, as if it is a fact long-since proven, that Derrek Lee is in decline. Sometimes, even, the Hoffpuerilites say it with glee, eagerly anticipating a DLee benching; for them, a DLee 0-fer elicits a Pavlovian response of drooling and growling.
Perhaps you have noticed that these statements are often carelessly unfactual. For example, recently one poster complained that the Cubs didn't even want the 2005 DLee as much as they just wanted the same Lee who had played pre-2005. Of course, what the Cubs have gotten from 2006-2008 IS that Lee. Derrek Lee's OPS+ from 2000-2004 are 124, 112, 131, 131, and 117. From 2006-2008, they are 112, 131, 110. It is nearly the same kind of distribution despite the fact that we're looking at Lee's age 30-32 seasons.
Yet, people keep saying he's in decline. It's true that players hitting their mid-30s can start to decline. But Lee is in great shape physically. He's not overweight or out of condition. It is possible that he's declining, but projection systems from PECOTA to CHONE to Bill James don't expect it. They include massive databases of statistics and body types and all sorts of information we can't take in when we make comparisons. Yet, so many think they know better.
Well, doesn't Derrek Lee's horrendous 2009 start prove that he's in decline? Did Alfonso Soriano's horrendous start to 2008 indicate he was in decline last year? Hardly. But let's not just "small sample size" this away. Let's actually look at Lee's stats this year.
Last year, Lee's problem was typified by his rolling over the ball and hitting more GBs than usual. His GB% went up 3.5% from his 2003-04, 2006-07 levels and up over 6% from his 2005 levels. This year, that GB% is back to the 2005 level, so far. Lee also has an "unlucky" BABIP of .232. I put "unlucky" in quotes because Lee's LD% is also way down. His LD% has been fairly consistent, even last year. So, this bears watching. But what was ailing Lee last year is not the same thing that's going on this year.
And that's what this whole myth of Lee's "decline" is predicated on. It expects you to believe that since 2005, Lee's stats are a straight line down. They're not. His 2006-2008 stats are all in line with his 2000-2004 stats. Yes, his last four-five months of 2008 were rough, but what was troubling him then is not the same thing holding his 2009 stats back.
So, the next time someone throws out DLee's "obvious decline," remember that 1) the stats don't back that idea up, 2) the projection systems don't back that up, and 3) even this year's frustrating beginning doesn't back that up. It's a myth.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
15 recs |
285 comments
Comments
Thank you.
Well said and presented, and I agree 100%.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 29, 2009 8:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Derrick Lee is no Wally Pipp, and Hoffpauir is no Lou Gehrig
That said my good friend the coach always maintained the star or starting player is more motivated by competition or the anxiety that some youngster is behind him/her trying to win that playing time. Nothing like competition. Hoffpauir is a fine role playing participate, hits in spots for power and the league has not figured him out yet. Gehrig (.373 47 HR’s) people forget followed the greatest player in history—-the Babe (.356 60 HR’s) and backed up by Muesel (who batted .337) and Lazzeri (.309 and 18 HR’s).
Derrick Lee is a very good player, he had a career year in 2005 when he hit .335 and hit 46 HR’s, and is a high quality 1B. He might not be the the quintessential #3 this year and in 2005 he wasn’t either until the Cubs approached May when he was clean up until then. This lineup and club is not balanced but could be.
I think right now Fukudome is probably the #3 right now and Theriot is probably #2 while Soriano is a the wild card at the #1.
Fine when then let us put Ramirez is the clean up and if/when Bradley is healthy and ready #5 where then the lineup is then stronger with D Lee at #6….
Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."
by Ivy Walls on Apr 29, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Posts like this are why BCB exists
Thank you very much, great post. Rec’d.
by lswaidz on Apr 30, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I hope you're both right...........
we’ll know more come September
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
by Clutche on Apr 30, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for No because I think he will rebound eventually but I do think he is on the decline.
He will put up respectable numbers and provide good defense, but he’s on the down turn of his career. That fly ball he hit to the warning track today against Arizona, used to be a home run. Still, he will probably hit .280 with 15-20 home runs.
by dlee25 on Apr 29, 2009 8:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, in the general sense
almost any player, except, for example, Barry Bonds, will not be as good from ages 32-40 as they were from 24-32. I think we all agree on that. But that’s not what people are meaning when they talk about Derrek Lee’s “decline.”
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, I wanted to say...
… this is an excellent example of a good FanPost. It’s a new topic, it’s presented well with facts to back up the writer’s opinion.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 29, 2009 8:30 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
agreed
How many BCB bucks did you reward DGU for his hard work?
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's the ratio of Schrute Bucks to Stanley Nickels?
The same as the ratio of Leprechauns to Unicorns. Duh.
by TheHawk5 on May 2, 2009 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let the lynching begin...
I voted “IT’S OBVIOS!” ‘cause it is people. He’s gone through HELL for a while now and as much as I support him helping his daughters cause I thin that’s where the toll has been taken.
Him not being able to concentrate on the game is secondary to him standing by his daughter. Hell, the game is probably way further down the list… which just goes to prove the point….
Lynch way….
an ad-lib on the standard reply when posting around here
by __Sean__ on Apr 29, 2009 8:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lynching...
really?
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Apr 29, 2009 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's drunk
don’t worry about it.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 29, 2009 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better than Himesing, I guess
Debatable as to whether it’s worse than Freying.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 29, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IT'S OBVIOS
wasn’t an option
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes Its Obvious
IS an option….in fact, it is the first option
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently not an option for you when it comes to jokes though
by Wreckard on Apr 30, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
jokes
what is that?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
spell-check
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shark?
what? Where?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how you can so easily dismiss May-Spetember of last year.
I’m not gonna sugarcoat his stretch of suckiness last year. He averaged an OPS of .762 from May through September. That’s simply awful. His walk rate is down for the third straight year, which is particularly bad here as usually you can expect older players to walk more as the power dwindles down. At least that’s what I’ve read in several Baseball Prospectus publications. Additionally, his ISO is down for the fourth straight year. That’s two huge components of his game clearly losing steam.
Looking a bit deeper, his pitch recognition isn’t as good anymore.Overall he’s swinging at more pitches now than he has in years, and that includes pitches both in and out of the zone. However, he’s making less contact on the in-zone pitches while making more contact on out-of-the-zone pitches.
I don’t have the same optimistic view of Lee as you do, as I see too many red flags popping up over the last year+.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 8:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not ignoring the red-flags. He had a rough end to the year.
Plenty of players go through similar stretches and bounce back.
And again, my plea here is to stop with the exaggeration. A .762 OPS is not “simply awful.” It’s sub-standard, especially for a 1B, but it’s hardly awful. And the projection systems take second half slides into account.
So answer me this. If you’re so dependent on Baseball Prospectus’ insight, why does Lee PECOTA out at .289/.368/.464 for his median projection?
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Using that .762 in place of his
.823 from last year places him 23rd among 30 first baseman with 400+ AB’s, right there with Ryan Garko, Rich Aurilia and Nick Swisher, with the latter considered a colossal failure on the south side last year.
Coming into this year, I expected something along the lines of .280/.345/.450 from last year, and I may be revising that soon. For the record, Hoff is projected to have a 816 OPS by Pecota this year.
Just wondering, do his recent swing tendencies and declining walk rate worry you at all?
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you don't get to ignore the first 6 weeks of 2008 as if they aren't relevant.
There are things Lee is doing right now that are of concern, but they aren’t the same things he did that was problematic in 2008. That’s significant.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From the numbers I'm looking at,
it’s like everything he did poorly last year is just getting worse this year. His walk rate is down, as it was last year. Same goes for his power, pitch recognition and swing trends. Outside of his overall contact and strikeout rate, I don’t see much of anything that hasn’t been trending downwards for a couple of years now.
What are these new issues that weren’t around last year? I’m not trying to challenge you, I’m just wondering what I’m missing here.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What #s are you looking at?
What particularly bothered people last year were the double plays, of which there are 0 this year, which is not surprising because his GB rate is down. That’s different.
His walk rate is down, but so is his k-rate. In that case, I think we just have to give him time to face a wider # of pitchers and see where that lands.
What’s an issue so far this year is that his LD rate is down. If that stays down, we’ll have a problem, but a different problem than last year. It seems to me, though, that he’s not squaring up on the ball, and that when he does, the LD rate will go up, and so will the overall stats.
Again, the main point is that this isn’t some steady, straight-line decline.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, his line drive rate is down from the usual 20-22 percent.
Interestingly, his BABIP is actually lucky, as it should be lower than it is considering his super-low 8.8 LD%(Hey, at least he’s not Chris Iannetta, he of the 0% rate over 42 AB’s.).
Anyway, here are the (three+ year) trends I’m looking at:
2006-2009.
BB%- 12.5, 11.1, 10.2, 8.2.
ISO- .189, .196, .172, .104.
HR/FB- 15.1%, 12.6%, 11.7%, 3.3%.
Outside Swing Rate- 17.7%, 18.7%, 20.8%, 22.7%.
Swing%- 40.9%, 41.2%, 43.7%, 45.7%.
Outside Contact Rate- 50.7%, 52.5%, 57.4%, 68.8%.
First Strike Rate- 55.4%, 56.4%, 57.6%, 61.3%
I’m not saying he won’t rebound from his poor start. Rather, I think the point he will rebound to won’t be a very good one. In my opinion, he won’t be anything more than a middle of the pack first baseman this year, and that’s best case scenario. I could be wrong, and I hope I am, but I have little confidence in a resurgence from Lee. I’d be ecstatic to just get another 2007 type season from him.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you and I are far apart on what we expect of Lee.
I expect him to be in the top half of 1B, but not the top third.
Of the trends you are looking at, the ISO is not a straight line, notably, and really most of 2005-2007 is similar; it’s 2008 which makes it look like a trend. And we all agree that 2008 was “bad” for Lee.
And what’s further problematic for these “trends” is that if you pick them apart into half-seasons, Lee’s 2007 second half was better than his first-half.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hasn't it been proven
that first and second half splits are poor indicators of future performance?
by dakoose on Apr 30, 2009 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I remember Nate Silver saying
that there’s a small nudge given to second half splits, but not much.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
what scares me about what you just said is that he appears to be finding new things to do that create problems and simple numbers wouuld suggest that will just increase his suckness.
That being said, his DP tendency going down is a good thing I suppose.
Kwa...Ki...Sur...Pee...Nee...Ku?
by Kinky Reggae on Apr 30, 2009 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Confused by PECOTA projections
But they are not totally for naught. Perhaps those numbers are based on his production over the past few seasons, and they saw 2008 as a bit of an outlier (at least everything after April). Or maybe they projected a bounce back from an injury. But as we know, projections are hardly perfect.
A .762 isn’t DFA material, but it’s pretty darn terrible. Miles had like a .760 OPS last year. So for about 5 months of 2008, Aaron Miles and Derrek Lee were very similar in their overall offensive value to their respective teams.
I will admit that the overall stats that Derrek put up in 2008 look OK. But if you remove the outlier months of April and May (May was actually his worst OPS month), he was pretty mediocre (.782 OPS). It’s easy to sell the idea ‘Hey, our 1B hit .290 with 20 homers!’, but fail to recognize that his OPS was just over league average for the better part of the year.
Look at the mans At-Bats why don’t you. Can you honestly say that his bat doesn’t look slow? It sure looks slow to me. To me, I don’t think I could be convinced that his bat isn’t slow until I see him actually pull a ball foul. Honestly, I don’t think I’ve seem him be out in front of a pitch yet this year. That, to me, conveys that his lack of production isn’t a timing issue, if it was he’d be late on fastballs and ahead on off-speed stuff. He is consistently, very consistently, late on everything.
Again and again he’s weakly fouling off pitches that should be squared up, and he’s not even crushing them foul. Everything his bat touches is dribbling straight back, or is popped up. Although he has impressive warning track power.
In my opinion, there are only 2 causes for optimism with Lee. 1. His bat is slowed because of an injury that maybe once is healed he can get that speed back again. And 2. His BABIP this year has been anorexic.
But at the same time his line drive numbers are way down as well, which is quite the opposite of discouraging. I’d also note that his BABIP from 2008 was .330, which is also an indicator that as bad as he was after April last year, he was still getting lucky. (Isn’t .300 about average?) And if you remove his two outlier months (May – .238, September – .368), his BABIP for 2008 was .352, which suggests that he was really lucky.
NOTE – After checking, Lee’s career BABIP is .322, so the .330 doesn’t seem to reveal as much as the .352.
I’ve said it in another thread, I would love to be wrong, but I have virtually no doubt that this guy is not going to be very good this year. I’m still thinking like a .260-.270 BA with like 12-15HRs. I think he’ll have something along the lines of a 4-6 week surge where he’ll get away with starting his swing early. But once the league sees what he’s doing, his numbers could fall like a stone.
Honestly, wake me up when he rips one foul down the LF line.
by WittyUserName on Apr 29, 2009 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to have a few professional scouts' opinions on Lee's swing.
Otherwise, I don’t put much stock in what fans see in players’ swings (and I’m including myself in that). We see what we want to see, plain and simple.
Now to the rest of your argument. You fall into the exaggeration-line when you call Lee’s non-Apr/May stats “pretty darn terrible.” Just ask Daric Barton what “pretty darn terrible” is. I’m not arguing they were good, especially not for Lee; but overall his season was a 110 OPS+ and you don’t get to just ignore the first two months of the season.
PECOTA sees the second-half split. If it was as significant as you think, it would dock Lee’s projections even more. It’s not as significant as you think.
When you say you have virtually no doubt that Lee is not going to be very good, you are saying that you know baseball better than the best projection systems and better than Lou Piniella who vouched for Lee this off-season.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His non-April 2008 was pretty darn terrible
I never gave credit to him for a good May, in fact, speaking strictly of OPS, May was by far his worst month last season. And his only really good month was April. I’m not ignoring anything, I may be removing his best month, but I am also removing his worst.
It’s important to look at his whole season, sure. But to say that Lee was just as effective on August 15th as he was on April 15th because he finished the year with a 110 OPS+ is just being naive. It is completely fair to isolate his best and worst months to try to get a better picture. And in the case of Derrek Lee’s 2008, it is almost required before any analysis because there was such a dramatic change in performance.
I took out his outlier months (his statistically best, and statistically worst) in order to try to get a better idea the kind of hitter he really was last year. Because he was not the 1.118 OPS guys that he was in April, and he wasn’t the .681 OPS guys he was in May. He was somewhere in the middle, and based on the other 4 months, he averaged an OPS of .782 (which I noted in my post). .782 is certainly not terrible, so maybe the language I used isn’t completely accurate, but a sub .800 OPS from a 1B whom isn’t quite as good defensively as his reputation, is a liability. There really is no two ways about it, he is a liability with a sub .800 OPS.
Again, what I find even more discouraging about last years numbers was the .352 BABIP I found by removing his outlier months. That suggests that even though he struggled, he might have been a bit lucky as well, as his .352 is 30 points higher than his career BABIP of .322.
You are correct in that it’s difficult to trust the eyes of a fan as opposed to baseball professionals. And surely, they should know better than you or I how fast Lee’s bat is.
But again, when was the last time he pulled a ball foul? I would type that last sentence in caps if it wasn’t so darn obnoxious because I think that the lack of pulled foul balls is incredibly telling. I have yet to see him be early on anything, I’ve only ever seen him be late. If he was sometimes early, I wouldn’t be writing him off, because it would give hope to the idea that he’s in a funk and will work out of it. But the fact that he seems to always be late, tells me that this isn’t something that is going to get better, and it could just get worse.
Now, I don’t claim to know more than projections experts or MLB managers. But projections aren’t facts. If they were taking numbers from his past 3 seasons, from a projection standpoint they could have viewed 2008 as a statistical anomaly as opposed to the start of a trend. If PECOTA had an accuracy approaching 100%, there would likely be no poor FA signings or fleecing in trades. Projections aren’t time machines.
Also, whether Lee is still here at the behest of Lou, or the NTC that binds him to the Cubs, Lou is by no means going to throw his starting 1B under the bus. And I’m not screaming ‘bench Lee, start Hoff’ although really I’d rather see that at this point, despite the fact I’m not a huge believer in Micah.
Lastly, you start the thread in, what I can only assume, an effort to generate discussion about whether or not Derrek Lee is declining as much as the general consensus would leave one to believe. And I put together a rather thought driven post, and you respond by inferring my opinion/judgment is irrelevant because PECOTA and Lou are (or were at least) in Derrek Lee’s corner. I’d appreciate it if you didn’t try to devalue my opinion when tossing my hat into an arena that you invite those with varying viewpoints into.
by WittyUserName on Apr 30, 2009 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Much of what we're discussing is precisely how to talk about these things.
But let’s take the two parts about Lee that remains first. If Derrek Lee had been a ML baseball player for just 2008, then maybe your strategy of removing the high and low outlier months would make sense. But you’re also throwing out 9 straight seasons of above-average ball, if you assume he’ll be below average going forward.
Secondly, let’s say I can remember Lee pulling a ball foul because I do have that memory in my mind. Where do we go from here in this conversation? Have you seen every one of his ABs? Can you correct my potentially faulty memory? What if Lee has been told by Lou and Gerald not to try to do that right now to get his hitting going? Then what does it tell us?
Next, you, who called me “naive” for something I didn’t say are asking me not to devalue your opinion. If by that you want respect, well, I assumed that a response which argued the merits of your case without name-calling showed respect. If by that you mean that I can’t show you where your opinion seems wrong to me, then one of us is in the wrong forum.
Here’s what I mean when I say we’re talking about how to talk about these things. Really, it’s very similar to what you’re arguing about projection systems. We don’t know what Derrek Lee’s 2009 will turn out to be. Never have I made the case that Lee will definitely do anything. I’ve allowed for the possibility that he will be in decline. You are the one who says you are certain about things.
I find it wrong to be certain about any player’s production. Alfonso Soriano is the perfect example – he goes through stretches where it looks certain to my eyes like he could hit anything and then he goes through stretches where it looks certain that he could be fooled by the fringiest ML pitcher. Of course neither is certain, even when he’s in those stretches.
So, you write,
I have virtually no doubt that this guy is not going to be very good this year.
And it’s precisely my own argument that you are over-stating the case and over-valuing the testimony of your own eyes. I truly am sorry if my case offends you.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you’re also throwing out 9 straight seasons of above-average ball
how many of those seasons worthof stats win a game in 2009?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I get your point, Tim.
Our players’ past performances are the best indicators we have to go on for how many games they might help win in 2009. W/o solid scouting data, that’s what we’ve got. Are you arguing something different?
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
First
My intention wasn’t to call you naive. But for someone to assume he was the same player last August 15th as he was last April 15th, IS being naive. You can’t just say Lee finished with an 110 OPS+ for 2008 and assume that he was equally productive throughout the season. Just because you average 60MPH for an hour, doesn’t mean you’re always going 60MPH.
There is validity to the notion that one would half to remove his outlier months each year, or the outlier years throughout his career to get a better indication of Lee’s production. But my point wasn’t to analyze his career, my point was to analyze 2008. You clearly were arguing that Lee still had a good 2008, as he finished with a 110+ OPS. I was arguing that when you remove the statistical extremes from last year, he was pretty mediocre. I can’t argue with 9 seasons of good offense from Lee, because he had them. But his production from three or four seasons ago isn’t really relevant at all. Sure, you could likely find some help by analyzing 2006 as well as 2007, but Sheffield has had tons of years of great offense, you can’t ascertain that he’ll have a good 2009 because he’s had a good career. What’s more is that my position is that Lee has abruptly lost a considerable amount of bat speed, so analyzing his career isn’t nearly as significant as analyzing his most recent season.
I have not seen all of Lee’s ABs, but I have watched, I believe, more than half of the games thus far this year, which would lead me to believe I’ve seen roughly half of his ABs. And perhaps when I’m not watching he’s crushing the ball foul out of play to LF. But when I have been watching, I haven’t seen him be out in front of anything. Ever. I know that I have seen every other position player be out in front of a pitch, and the fact that I haven’t seen Lee do it seems like an indication of what I’ve been saying.
I have thought, and will continue to think, that Lee isn’t only in decline, but he’ll struggle to be very good at all this year. I won’t apologize for thinking that. I’ve also stated that there are two causes for optimism with lee:
“1. His bat is slowed because of an injury that maybe once is healed he can get that speed back again. And 2. His BABIP this year has been anorexic”
Perhaps the slow bat that I am witnessing is a result of Lee playing through an injury that maybe he should have let heal. And maybe if he does sit for a while, he could recover completely and get that bat speed back again. I’ve never said that it’s impossible for him to be good this year, or ever again, I’ve just said that I don’t think that he will.
by WittyUserName on Apr 30, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said he was the same player on Aug 15 than he was on Apr 15
What I am saying is that his net 2008 season stats does more to help us predict 2009 than just his August 2008 stats.
Consider this. The last DLee stats we had before 2009 were his playoff stats. Should we have concluded from those that he’d hit .500 this year? They were, after all, the most recent stats we had. By no means! We need to use as much of Lee’s career (weighted properly) as possible.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely disagree
with the fact that a fan can’t pick out a flaw in one’s game. Do you need a scout to tell you that Cotts is terrible? No. Some people on this site have played baseball at a high level, coached, and studied the game endlessly. Having the term scout attached to your name is not the end all be all.
Its funny, you spend most of your life gripping a baseball. And in the end, its almost always the other way around.
by TCobb1911 on Apr 30, 2009 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree with that.
I simply have no way of knowing who has that expertise on an anonymous blog.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on May 2, 2009 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DGU (or anyone else) can correct on this...
I’m putting this here b/c it relates to a few points in Wittys post (though I’m not meaning this entirely as a response because he covers a lot more than I’m going to here…)
You don’t really look at a cross league BABIP as being meaningful. As you probably know, BABIP is correlated to the LD% of a given hitter (+.12). Looking at a league-wide average BABIP doesn’t really tell you anything, save perhaps what one might expect the average hitter to break down on a LD/FB/GB%. Do you guys know of any reason why you would compare an individual’s BABIP to the league at large? (This is reference to your comment about “Isn’t .300 BABIP about average”).
You also don’t just cross compare a players BABIP from year to year irrespective of his LD/FB/GB%. A player could have a .330 BABIP two years in a row and still be lucky one year and unlucky in another…
by CubsWin!Oregon on Apr 30, 2009 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Valid point...
…and that is what had concerned me most about Lee.
His bat speed declined for several months in 08, and I am not sure whether he was playing through pain, or whether it is the start of a decline in his skills. Me experience is telling me it may have been the former, because good players typically don’t decline that quickly without a physical issue. Lee did not attack the ball the same way for the last 2-3 months, and he has been too consistant over his career for me to think it was not a physical problem.
We’ll see how things go, but I tend to think this neck thing has been bothering him for a while.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Apr 30, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is the other point I'm trying to make -
a banged-up Lee is not the same as a declining Lee. They may amount to the same thing for the next few months, or even for all of 2009, but it’s not the same thing.
And your point about good players not declining this quickly is one to be highlighted, because not only has Lee been a very good player for 9 seasons, he’s still a fit player. This is not Mo Vaughn we’re talking about here.
Rec’d
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
…there is no reason a good hitter can’t be a good hitter into his mid to even late thirties, especially if they stay in decent shape. This is why I stated last year that I suspected a chronic issue that is not allowing him to get the bat from the launch position – to impact, as quickly as he used to.
If it is a chronic neck condition (and I suspect it is), those can be really difficult, because any thing in the spine has a domino effect as to how well you can move your body. Lastly, if it is a bulged disc, the nerves that control some of your upper limb muscles are in this area. If those nerves get compressed, it can cause a very subtle decline in reaction time, that is only measured with sophisticated nerve conduction testing.
Something is keeping him from swinging the bat like he still should be able to with his skill, and I hope they find a way to get him over that hump.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Apr 30, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't
want to get into a steroids discussion, but I think that Bonds is a great example of what you are saying. Not all of his impressive hitting was steroids powered. He had one of the best eyes in the game and even into his forties he could find his pitch and put it out of the park. I realize he is a very special case but I think he proves your point quite well.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And one thing we could note in hope
is that the Cub trainers got Blanco over it and he went on to have one of his best hitting seasons of his career.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe you should wait till you're sober to post.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 29, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
... and representing the anti-Lee position admirably.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 8:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I used to think it was funny to leave drunk voice mails
Until a friend forwarded one back to me. Yeah, never been tempted to do it again.
Make sure you go back and read these tomorow.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 29, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
good point
I don’t type so well w/ a buzz on that’s for sure. Regardless I don’t think my stance on the situation is any different. I do think he’s been distracted, for goo d reason and that it is obvious his game has suffered.
by __Sean__ on Apr 30, 2009 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Distracted"?
How?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
c'mon bra
This entire thread has dudes sayin’ the same thing as for his distractions with his daughter. It’s not just me and no one’s being mean spirited, it seems to be the consensus non the less.
by __Sean__ on Apr 30, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that combined w/
his neck and wrist lead to major distractions.
by __Sean__ on Apr 30, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
or he is jealous that Hoff has EA
and he has nothing
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ha ha ha
Funny! I’m w/ Al; Put him on the DL.
by __Sean__ on Apr 30, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree and have said so
Henry Blance missed about a month last season with bulging disc in his neck. Lee likely needs the same, if not more time if this has been ongoing for 3 season now.
For those who truly do not understand what a bulging disc is, here is a link from my dr that explains it in basic terms. www.procarespine.com/disc_herniated.php
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the end of this season,
I think Lee is the division’s fifth best first baseman, maybe even the worst. Pujols, Berkman, Votto and Fielder are all better in my book, and if LaRoche has really gotten past his first half jitters, he may be better as well. And no, his defense doesn’t make up the (enormous) gap in offense.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 8:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Enormous gap?
Wow, he’s going to step out of it. It’s not like were 50 games into the season, and he’s still batting Mendoza-ish. It’s 18 games.
"Check the magic of a winning season and there are always reasons beyond the talent." Ned Colleti
by wrigleyrocker12 on Apr 29, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be how many games...
we were into the season.
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Apr 30, 2009 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, we're 20 games into the season.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Key word was...
“were” as I assumed 18 was the number at the time of the post. Although I think he meant 19, as it was definitely before the 20th game.
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Apr 30, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not relevant.
Those are 4 of the best 10 1B in baseball. LaRoche and Lee are in my pre-season rankings for top 15 1B. It’s like arguing that Yunel Escobar’s no good because all the other SSs in the NL East are so good.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
That’s just bad luck for them.
"Check the magic of a winning season and there are always reasons beyond the talent." Ned Colleti
by wrigleyrocker12 on Apr 29, 2009 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
have you thought to do a point / counterpoint type post with the author of this post?
would be neat to see both posts in one, showing the good and the bad from two perspectives side by side
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda made a little post/comment already,
and we may go back and forth a bit. But that’s a pretty good idea. Not tonight though, as I have a decent amunt of homework, which I should be doing right now.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it would be interesting if two people on here
any two who have a disagreement about a player did a point / counterpoint type post allowing the conversation to (hopefully) stay informative, and a good debate. Who knows, we might all learn something.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my only problem with this post
which was well presented, and I give you kudos for that, is that all the stats of every player from 2008 or prior wins us 0 games in 2009. I know stats help to get a true idea of a player, and his trends, but there is also a time to look at present stats and not stats of yesteryear.
Again, great post, and I appreciate the time you took to post it, it was well thought out, innformative, and a breath of fresh air. I rec’d it
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 8:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post, thanks!
I voted for “We won’t know for a while yet.”
Since you’ve studied this in detail, what do you think best explains 2008?
by DudeVf11 on Apr 29, 2009 9:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Your poll results validate the sagging belief Cub fans have in Derrek Lee
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 29, 2009 9:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if he gets hot or cold in May
the results are different. I bet most of us are voting on their current emotion more than anything
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, 75% of BCB voters have the patience
of a sailor on shore leave.
this was part of a well documented psychology study at Wattsamadu U.
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i went to Funk U
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not emotion...
it is a vote cast based purely on performance to date. I can only keep it that simple so that I can defend my position.
I would agree that his stats are not that horrible when you look at them over the past couple seasons. He has apparently though, added bad habits/more frequent slumps on a steady basis which is cause for concern in my opinion.
Kwa...Ki...Sur...Pee...Nee...Ku?
by Kinky Reggae on Apr 30, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
belief
and fact rarely go together.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's my challenge for all those who think it's obvious that Lee is done.
(And I don’t know what you’ll find, so maybe I’ll look silly in challenging this-) but find me a player who had an OPS+ over 150 somewhere between his age 27-31 seasons, as well as above average seasons consistently for 9 straight seasons, and then never had another above-average season after he turned 33. Is there a single player in the modern era who fits that description?
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OPS+ > 150, 9 above average, then finished
Mo Vaughn is close, he was done at age 34.
David Ortiz looks to be done, also age 33. 3 seasons 150+ age 27-31, 9+ above average and now his OPS+ is 63.
Not saying Lee is done, but recent similar decline paths exist.
by cliff on Apr 30, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now ask yourself this -
Does Derrek Lee’s body type look like Mo Vauhn’s or David Ortiz’?
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
besides their dark suntans?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so you have to have the same body type to have the same decline?
you’re clutching at straws here. Lee is in decline.
by aramis on Apr 30, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Body type
I’m sorry, I didn’t realize you asked is there a single player with Derrek Lee’s body type in the modern era who fits that description.
by cliff on Apr 30, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, my point
is that Lee is not carrying extra weight as those guys are. That is a relevant factor.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on May 2, 2009 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not quite sure what you are saying there
The poll results do perhaps confirm the sagging belief Cub fans have in Derrek Lee. But they certainly don’t validate it.
by simonuk on Apr 30, 2009 7:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To really get a good gauge of a player's current trends
It’s pays to look at his more controllable skills (walks, strikeouts, power) than his actual results, because those correlate best from year to year and aren’t muddied with luck or other factors. Looking at those controllable skills over the past three seasons, I definitely see some signs of decline.
2007: 11.1 BB%, 20.1 K%, .196 ISO (650 PA)
2008: 10.2 BB%, 19.1 K%. .172 ISO (698 PA)
2009: 8.2 BB%, 17.9 K%, .104 ISO (75 PA)
He is walking less, striking out less and hitting for less power. K’s have actually been shown to have a decent correlation with walks and homers, so if he is striking out less than that isn’t really a positive thing, especially for a guy who doesn’t have the speed to sustain a really high BABIP.
It’s too early to tell whether he is actually fallen off of the cliff this year, but he is most likely on the downside of his career. As a first baseman with a below average glove (at least based on most defensive metrics), he is simply not offering the Cubs anything in the way of production right now. Regardless or whether or not he is actually in decline (I think he is for the reasons I stated above), he is hurting the team right now, and it doesn’t appear that he will turn it around any time soon. I hate to say this, but Micah should probably be getting some starts at first, at least until Lee shows something offensively.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 9:32 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
all i see here is
Lee should be traded for Pujols, as the Cardinals request
actually, vivaelpujols, I always look forward to your posts, they are always well thought out, and insightful.
now about the trade idea
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Throw in Gathright and we've got a deal
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell, we'll give you Miles back, too
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 29, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and Cotts
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well and objectively stated
Thank you. You took the emotion out of this debate and provided solid analysis.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 29, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think Lee's 2009 stats, as is, this early in the season, are a relevant data point for this analysis?
No, you admit they do not in the last third of your post, thereby contradicting the first third of your post.
This I totally agree with:
It’s too early to tell whether he is actually fallen off of the cliff this year, but he is most likely on the downside of his career.
Of course a 33 year old is “on the downside of his career.” The question is how steep this downside is. I am arguing against those who say Lee’s decline is dated back to 2006 (which you left out of your analysis) and is steep right now. Further, I am arguing that while they may end up right, they are unlikely to be right.
As for Lee’s glove, I’m aware of the range metrics. Meanwhile Lee continues to have a very good reputation, which doesn’t necessarily count for anything. But watching Lee, I believe his range is average, but he is a picking machine at 1B, which is very relevant when you have Aramis Ramirez and Ryan Theriot throwing from the left side.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see three main data points in Lee's numbers over the past few seasons
These are the last three seasons in which he was healthy all year. His 2005 season when he was a monster (given his previous and preceding seasons, that looks like a fluke), his 2007 season, in which he was still very good with an OBP of .400 and a wOBA of around .390 (although his BABIP was very high), and his 2008 year which was almost exactly league average for a first baseman. Before this year, I would have projected Lee to hit somewhere between his 2007 and 2008 level of performance. However, given his abysmal start, and the fact that his ISO and BB rate have pretty much gone down for 5 straight seasons, I would say that it is more likely that he is suffering a decline in skills, rather than a random cold streak.
Also, a note on first basemen “picks”. Mitchell Litchman wrote an interesting article about valuing first baseman’s scooping ability. Because his method comes with a lot of error bars, the individual results aren’t going to be perfect, however it the spread is only about 8 runs from the best to worst, meaning that even really good pickers aren’t going to be that valuable.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, but was Lee healthy all last year?
Reports have been coming out that Lee has been playing banged up. Now, he may never get healthy again. That certainly seemed the case to the Cubs with Moises Alou at the end of 2003.
Thanks for the article reference.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
has he been healthy the past few years?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We simply don't know with players like Lee who play through their injuries.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that is the case, I wouldn't be surprised if he was injured this year
That would partly explain the Neifi-esque hitting.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the bulging disk in his neck
could certainly be related.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the bulging disk could go away. Or it could not.
It could go away next month. Or it could go away in September. Or it could not.
A player whose performance is suffering from injuries is not the same as a player whose body is no longer capable of playing at the ML level because of age. It may end up amounting to the same thing, but it is definitely not the same thing.
Again the point – is that Lee’s future is not nearly as simple to predict as many want to assume it is.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if it is the same one from 2007
that he missed two weeks due to, and has later come out he played with last season, then this is year three of this bulging disc issue, and he needs to sit for an extended time and get it corrected (like Hank White did last season).
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That could very well be.
I’d love to get more information on just what is ailing Lee.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis...but...
…you’re forgetting the mighty N. I think it’s a great disservice to include this year with those the prior two years. A sample size that is a bit more than 10% of 2007 and 2008 is just plain shit at this point. You can fairly compare 2007 to 2008, but not to 2009. Not yet.
Also, saying Micah Hoffpauir deserves playing time over Lee is ridiculous if the factor is age; Micah is 4 years younger than Lee (29 vs. 33). He’s not 22, 25, or even 27. He’s twenty-nine years of age. He’s probably gonna start regressing, too, hell.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Apr 29, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont look at who is the future or past of the team
I worry about the now, as we all should. And IF Hoff is the better option, you got to run with it, right?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you're smarter than this Timbo.
Com’on! Micah is a great bench option. He’s not a starter over a Gold Glover, leader, and superb bat. Silly.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Apr 29, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but is Dlee
still a gold glover and a supern bat (now, not last season)?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
superb
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 29, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you give him
a real chance to prove it.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i am not writing him of........yet
but there seems to be a decline from what is seen, and what vivaelpujos has provided stat to back up
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats not all that silly.
Last year, Lee hit like a very mediocre first baseman overall, and hit like a second baseman from May-Sep. For what it’s worth, Hoffpauir and Lee came into the season with similar projections for OPS, and if Hoff takes a little step forward while Lee takes a little step back, that makes Hoff more than a little better than Lee.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's be clear about Hoff's projections
His median PECOTA is .261/.327/.490. Your collapsing this into OPS hides the fact that Micah is projected to make a lot of outs. In a lineup as deep as the Cubs, Lee’s projected OBP becomes even more valuable.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually wOBA is the most valuable
Because it weighs all aspect of offense by how much they contribute to runs. Before this year, CHONE projected Lee to have a .381 wOBA and Hoffpauir to have .349 wOBA. Not even considering defense, that is about a 16 run difference between the two players. Of course Lee’s projection seems worthless, considering how badly he is hitting right now, but he is definitely a better player than Hoffpauir.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exaggerate, exaggerate, exaggerate
You start to make good points and then ruin them with exaggeration.
Lee’s projection seems worthless, considering how badly he is hitting right now,
Why? James Loney was hitting as poorly as Lee up to when Lee sat, and then has recently come alive. Jimmy Rollins is still struggling to approach his projection. All hitters, except, of course, Albertus Magnus, will go on slumps this year. Just because Lee started the season on a slump does not throw out his projection for the year.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
His projections shouldn’t be worthless, but they should be re-projected because of the extended slump that he is in. By weighing his preseason projection and his current slump, I have him hitting for around a .367 wOBA the rest of the way. Which is basically average for a first baseman. Add that with average fielding at first, and he looks like a 1 WAR player this year, which isn’t very good.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Ryan Theriot?
He’s in an extended slump. The only reason people don’t notice it is because he started the season very, very hot for 1 week. Do we need to re-project him, now that we’re seeing a two week slump?
Everybody wants to be able to predict the season 3 weeks in. The Rays started the season 8-11 last year, too. It’s time for patience, not re-predictions.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have to repredict peoples performance based on the current performance
If you think that Lee is a “true” .380 wOBA hitter, and his is hitting way worse than that so far, than you can either write it off as small samples size, or you can incorporate it into your preseason projection. I choose to do the latter, you can do whatever you want.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
writing off what has happaned vs incorporating it makes less sense, since one actually has happened, the other would be dismissing it because it does not support your argument
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope.
Did vivaelpujols write off Miguel Cabrera’s slow start last year? Did he make too much of Nate McLouth’s hot start last year. What about Carlos Beltran’s slow start last year? What about Soriano’s slow start last year? At this point in the season slow or fast starts don’t prove as much as people think they do.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have incorperated them into my projection if I had bothered too
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 30, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO
projections are an educated guess
reality does not always mirror projections as we all know.. Rich HIll was projected to have a good 2008 for prime example.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
Projections are more educated guesses than our personal guesses (unless we are professional scouts)
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
but the point i was making, is people seem to get too wrapped up in previous seasons stats and projections of a player and sometimes lose sight of what is taking place on the actual field.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I am arguing that people get too wrapped up
in slow starts. Please, trade me Jimmy Rollins, B.J. Upton, Mark Teixeira, and Brandon Philips. Maybe one of them really will end up with a clunker of a season, but the most likely eventuality is that they will all end up playing as projected.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do agree
its really a catch 22. either their projected stats and prior seasons do pan out, or the player falls off the map. anything can happen, and that is why they play the game.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
George Brett is a gold glover, and he's not starting for the Royals.
And by all accounts, D-Lee really isn’t much of a clubhouse leader. He’s a steady, stoic contributor.
And he’s certainly not a “superb” bat. He’s only been “superb” for 4 seasons in his career, and that’s stretching the definition about as far as I can without looking silly.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 30, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
4 years ago for Lee was 2005.
So, yeah, forgive me for thinking age is one point in Hoff’s favor.
by Orval Overall on Apr 29, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee is a superior player to Hoff
However right now Hoffpauir is clearly hitting the ball well, while Lee just looks awful. If this was a 20 at bat hitless streak than I would still start Lee because it has been pretty much proven that “hot streaks” have no predictive value. However at ~70 PA, it is starting to get to the point where we can make some basic inferences about how well a hitter will continue to hit in the near future. Again, I don’t think that Hoffpauir is a better player than Lee, however he is the better player right now.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
below average glove?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 29, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's true
His UZR’s have consistently hovered around average since 2002. At 33 years old, he is only going to get worse defensively. So I would call him slightly below average. UZR does have it’s flaws, and I wouldn’t advise using it in the context of one season; however, when you see such a consistent year-to-year correlation like he has had, it tends to be pretty conclusive.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about that.
For instance, Baseball prospectus has Lee as +7 for 2008. Defensive metrics vary wildly, and it’s usually not a good idea to look at just one or to eliminate the eye-test. I wouldn’t say Lee is below average defensively just yet.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball Prospectus' fielding metric is lightyears behind UZR
It is basically range factor, with a shitload of adjustments thrown in. I can’t even go about explaining how that is wrong. The end result, is that you get Michael Young rated as excellent defender, and Grady Sizemore rated well below average. Again, UZR isn’t perfect, but over a large sample size it is pretty good. It is WAY better than BP’s metric.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, you buy into the simplistic template
At 33 years old, he is only going to get worse defensively.
Unless he plateaus for several years, or recovers from previous injuries and bounces back. It reminds me of what people were saying about Magglio Ordonez back in 2006 (when he was Lee’s age, coincidentally). In 2007, Ordonez’ hitting and fielding took a tremendous rebound jump.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because it is a simplistic template
The facts are, Derrek Lee has been rated around average for the past 7 seasons. 7 years is enough data, so that I can confidently say it represents his true fielding ability. At 33 years old, most players, even first basemen exhibit some decline in their fielding ability. So if Lee has been an average defender for the past few years, and is now past his defensive prime, it is a pretty valid assumption that he will get worse with age.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are you really saying?
Are you saying, as I quoted, that he will only get worse or are you saying that he might stay average for several years before getting worse?
Sure, we all agree that in 2012 he will be worse, but I don’t think many people here care what he will be in 2012. He may easily maintain his defense for the next three years. He may even see an uptick this year or next year. We don’t know for sure that he will “only get worse” in the short-term future.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
However, history shows that players get worse on defense when they age. We should expect the same for Lee.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right - long-term, he'll be worse.
But who knows what he’ll be for the remainder of his Cub contract? PECOTA expects his defense to stay on this plateau – which is not “only get worse.”
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't trust PECOTA when it comes to defense
Their fielding metric is, umm… suspect, and any conclusions drawn from the flawed metric are wrong. You could do you’re own projection based off of UZR (weighing the last 3 years of data and then applying an aging curve like this one). It turns out that at age 33 is when 1B really start to decline fielding wise, at least by that particular UZR regression.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you on the value of the defensive metrics
but I think you can still take value from their overall projections without buying too heavily into their metrics.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But PECOTA is not even close to UZR or Total Zone
Defensive metrics are valuable, just not PECOTA’s. You saying that PECOTA projects Lee to do well on defense doesn’t mean anything, because the data used to make the conclusions is most like wrong.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 29, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not totally
They are looking at a complete player, and, fwiw here, BP’s defensive rating is not far off UZR. So, they expect Lee to maintain his skills through 2011, and then to have his defense start to tail off. This would be more of an issue if their defensive metrics for Lee were wildly different than UZR, but they’re not.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're missing the point
BP’s metric isn’t close to UZR. It is basically range factor, where UZR uses play by play data. PECOTA metrics are likely so far off of the mark, that they will lead you to wrong conclusions.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on Apr 30, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you just said what i been saying
stats and projections are nice, but the reality of what he can or cannot do is more important
and I do not see him reaching the projections with the slow start, and the neck problem
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FANTASTIC SABERMAGICIAN POST.
Lee also has an “unlucky” BABIP of .232.
This is more than unlucky. This will increase to .300 or .320 by the end of the year. No way in hell it stays below .300. I would kiss you DGU if I could. Well done.
Dan
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
by dtpollitt on Apr 29, 2009 9:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What are Hoffpuerilites?
Is that like the Hittites? Well, whatever it is, I guess I am one, and I doubt you’ll find a post from me saying Lee is in decline. When this topic came up, I think I said the evidence was pretty mixed, but was susceptible to being interpreted as a decline.
And despite what you say here, I dont see how thats deniable. Throw 06 out b/c of the injury. To say his 07-09 stats are comparable to his 00-04 stats (when he was a young and improving ballplayer), with his incredible 05 thrown in between, draws a pretty clear picture for me of a bell curve — ascending through the 05 peak, and descending ever since. Hence, decline. Does that mean he’s terrible? No. Does it mean Hoff is a better HITTER than him today? Again, no, though I happen to think that case for that is ever stronger. But its not propogating a “myth” to say his skills are in decline. Its one pretty reasonable interpretation of the evidence.
by Orval Overall on Apr 29, 2009 10:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
By Hoffpuerilites I do not mean all Hoffpauir fans at all.
I’m referring to the childish few (hence, please pardon the poor pun on “puerile”) for whom Micah can do no wrong and Derrek can do no right. Their absurd posts are as grating as the taunts you hear on grade-school playgrounds.
As for your argument… hitters seasons don’t always, or even necessarily often go on straight bell curves. Look at Moises Alou. He had troughs in 1996-97 and 2002-2003, but continued to be productive much longer than I or Jim Hendry expected. Look at DLee’s #1 comp on his PECOTA – John Olerud. His career went up and down.
This is my biggest complaint with the DeclineLee storyline – it’s utterly simplistic to the point of not being very realistic.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh Jeez...
Their absurd posts are as grating as the taunts you hear on grade-school playgrounds.
Derrek Lee is in decline. Sometimes, even, the Hoffpuerilites say it with glee,
I think you’re overexaggerating. I mean, besides that CLUTCHE guy, are their truly any Hoff fans “saying it with glee”? I guess I’m not seeing it. I"m seeing a lot of “DLee is in decline”, but not all those people are Hoff fans gleefully wanting DLee to fail, necessarily.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Apr 30, 2009 6:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe so.
And I don’t want to name any names. I’ll retract that as a complaint about the current BCB community.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like both Hoff and DLee
but I want the Cubs to win, no matter who is in the line up, and I want the best line up on the field. If Hoff flops, it is a cheap loss in salary, and we can move on to the next person. If DLee continues to struggle, you cannot keep running him out there.
I want wins, and I do not care if Cotts is at first, if that produces wins. To me, elmiinate the last name, and the face, and look at who allows us the best chance to win day in and day out.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted "Yes"
But having done so, I think the Cubs can still survive with an aging DLee provided the other bats in the regular lineup get healthy (ARam, Bradley) and get going (Fontenot, Soto). Not sure I’d leave him in the #3 spot, though.
by CaliCub on Apr 29, 2009 10:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think I'd leave him at No. 3
but moving him down to No. 6 or No. 7 might not change things, because as a result you’re probably moving Soto up – and he hasn’t hit yet. Once Soto starts hitting, I can see sliding Lee down to 6 or 7, depending on the lineup.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Apr 30, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that too many people are treating this like an "all or nothing" proposition
There has to be a middlle ground between the “DLee is still great, just give him time” people and the “DLee sucks make way for Micah” contingent.
Personally, I think the people who seem to not see any decline in his skills are in serious denial based on the fact that they really like him. I mean, I remember how hard it was for me to acknowledge a similar fact about Ryno when he made his comeback in ’96.
I like Lee. I don’t advocate taking him out of the lineup (although I would try resting him maybe more than he seems to like). He simply should not be hitting in the 3 hole anymore. Move him down, take some of the pressure off of him and see how he responds.
Mike Murphy on WSCR the other day said that he thinks Lou’s afraid to move Lee in the order which, if true, boggles my mind. Keeping him where he is, whether it’s some sort of a “respect for a veteran thing” or not, isn’t helping him or the team.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 29, 2009 10:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike Murphy is always cooking up strange theories.
I don’t buy for a second that Lou is afraid to move any players down the lineup. Hell, he’s already moved Milton Bradley around a little bit, and if there’s anyone to be afraid of, it’s Milton Bradley.
by dakoose on Apr 29, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope you're right
I don’t usually put much stock into anything Murphy says but, in this case, Lou does seem to be fairly stubborn about messing with Lee.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 29, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you read what I'm saying here carefully
you will see, I hope, that I am arguing precisely the same thing, namely that too many people have a simplistic narrative to Lee’s career. I am not arguing that he will definitely be good old 2007 Derrek Lee this year. I am not arguing that he will be better than Micah Hoffpauir this year. I am arguing that the “rapid decline” narrative is baseless.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
So what point are you making then? Leave him where he is and hope he comes out of it…move him in the order, etc.?
by bluekoolaide on Apr 29, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm making a few points.
1) The main point is that the “DLee is in precipitous decline” crowd are making a case that is not built on facts.
Other points are that
2) What marked Lee’s poor year last year – excessive GBs, is not his problem so far this year. We’re looking at a different Lee than the one who disappointed for the second half of 2008 (minus the post-season).
3) The projection systems still project Lee to be good this year and better than Micah Hoffpauir (sure they could be wrong, but they know more about prediction that we as individuals do).
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 29, 2009 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LET'S HOPE D. LEE
Snaps out of this and can be productive at the plate , But it is so painful watching him the way it is now…….
by cubs north on Apr 29, 2009 11:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
D Lee hasn't played right since his daughter was diagnosed
D Lee has not been right since his daughter Jada was diagnosed in 2006 with Leber’s congenital amaurosis, a rare genetic disease resulting in loss of vision.
I don’t have the hard numbers but someone that has that ability please used that as your starting point.
I honestly can’t blame him. His mind has to be somewhat filled with that everyday.
I expect him to rebaound and go on a tear once school lets out and his daughter is home.
The Cubs will be great in 2008!
by Scott G F on Apr 30, 2009 6:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is another version of the myth.
Derrek Lee’s 2007 was right up there with his best pre-2005 seasons. He’s not unfocused on baseball, focused instead on his daughter.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do know....
that earlier this year, Lee revealed that Jada had been misdiagnosed and does not have the disease?
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Apr 30, 2009 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
really?
I didn’t know that! Do you have a link?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard that too, but I can't find the link right now.
Lee is, however, still supporting Project 3000.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.1sttouch.org/home.htm
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Apr 30, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well!
that’s awesome that she doesn’t have it, and doubly awesome that he’s keeping the foundation alive anyway.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and somewhat hilarious that he got so many teammates to donate
to something that his daughter didn’t even have
by aramis on Apr 30, 2009 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hilarious?
or maybe, a good thing, hmmm?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good thing
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he's in decline, BUT...
I do think his hand/wrist are still and issue and will be for the rest of his professional career. Don’t laugh at this comparison, but I watch a lot of MMA, spar a bit myself, and know some people who train (although they’ll never be at a professional level). A broken/damaged hand or wrist is one of the worst injuries you can sustain because that broken hand or wrist, even when it’s healed, will always be a problem. You’re always going to have some type of pain in that hand when doing something that is physically taxing, it’s never going to be as strong as it once was, and your mind and body will adjust how you use that hand to minimalize the pain/avoid injury. His nagging neck/back/disc issue isn’t helping things either. I think if he could at least get over that, he’ll be solid for the rest of the year, despite the previous injury to his hand.
by Craig in South Bend on Apr 30, 2009 7:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I respect your personal perspective on this.
The problem is that his 2007 was just as good as his best pre-2005 years.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and neither 2007 or pre 2005 seasons stats win a game in 2009 or beyond
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about this, then, Tim, as a corollary to what you are saying -
None of 2009’s banked stats will win a game going forward either. Just because Mike Fontenot hit 2 HRs the first two games of the series didn’t mean he’d hit one the third game.
Would you trade Aaron Hill and Brandon Inge for Brandon Philips and Aramis Ramirez? No – despite the frustrating starts for the latter two, they are still better bets, based on career stats, to do better than those two hot starters.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
again that is the beauty of the game
anything can happen when the games are played.
and if I was the GM of the Pirates, I would probably make that trade, but ask for less in return so i do not feel like I am taking advantage of you :=)
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
2008 was skewed because of his hot start
And in 2008/2007 he hit below his norm in HR and RBI’s. 2006 he was hurt, so he didn’t produce that year. But he hit into career highs for GiDP’s in ’08 and ’07, and was in route to that in ’06 with 11 in 50 games.
Am I saying he shouldn’t be on the team? No. He is a good defensive asset. But he is not producing in the 3-hole.
by GoCubbies34 on Apr 30, 2009 7:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that's the whole issue...
…maybe he’s declining, maybe he comes back strong, but we have BETTER options for the 3 hole, and I think that’s the most frustrating thing about the whole DLee thing. Is that his fault? No. That’s on Lou.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Apr 30, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In 2007, Lee DID NOT hit below his norm.
It was the same OPS+ as his best pre-2005 years. If he was below-norm in RBIs, then go look at who was batting in front of him. Also, his GDP problem was last year and is not the problem this year (so far).
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DId you read what I wrote?
He hit below his norm in HR AND RBI’S. As a player in the 3-hole, he is not producing how he should. I don’t give two flying flips about his OPS+ as that doesn’t consider position or spot in the order.
by GoCubbies34 on Apr 30, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RBI's don't reflect anything about a player' skill
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 1, 2009 5:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was right there with his pre-05 best years.
However, I dont’ think that the Cubs were expecting Lee to revert to that level when they gave him an eight-figure salary.
Whether it was because of injury, or a fluke contract year, or aging, the Lee deal just hasn’t worked out. Thank goodness it’s over in 2010.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 30, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um
he has been worth more than he has been paid.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read through this entire thread.
I think the back/neck problems are likely the source of much of this. Any sort of trouble like this is going to make it more difficult to swing a bat and make good contact. Lee is the type of player who you have to force to take a day off.
Maybe they need to force him to take 15 days off and really, truly heal, because playing every day isn’t going to help back and neck trouble.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 8:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I love that thru this entire debate and discussion
no attacks on each other, good discussion without calling people stupid, etc. to me this is a perfect example of how a thread should be. a topic that generates discussion, and a discussion that doesnt generate high blood pressure
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Your rational post...
is making my blood boil.
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Apr 30, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Easy Does It Buddy!
Cut that stuff out or I’ll Flag you and tell Al
I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Apr 30, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flag me...
and I’ll flog you. Simple as that!
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Apr 30, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A virtual flogging?
what does that even mean? :)
I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on May 5, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I think injuries are probably the most likely cause of 2008's last 130 games,
I’m not sure that injuries affected the start of 2009. When did Lee’s neck become a problem? And if it’s been all season, why didn’t off-season rest start him fresh? Did it show up in spring training?
Now, I don’t want the Cubs telling us those things, because they give an edge to opposing teams’ prep, but I do hope DLee is giving a full and open report of his health to the Cubs’ trainers.
I also think It is still possible that he’s just not started squaring up the ball yet, because his timing is a smidge off.
But with either of those cases, an adjustment or proper attention of the trainers can return to us an above-average producer at 1B.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
then again would we expect honesty about Lee's neck
after the “he is progressing just fine” reports about Prior for how long?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We shouldn't expect honesty from the Cubs on injuries;
being honest does not help them win and can hinder them from winning.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injuries happen in baseball
Enough with the injury excuse for Derrek Lee. If injuries have taken a definite toll on his productive value over the last few years, then it is what it is. At age 33 Lee is very doubtful going to find the magical fountain of youth in terms of injuries and health. Talking about Lee’s injuries doesn’t excuse his marked decline in productive value. It is what it is. Lee is becoming something of an albatross to this lineup.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 30, 2009 9:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Again you exaggerate
Lee has not had injuries take a toll on his production the last few years. His production was only down for part of last year (yes, it was the greater part).
Also, I have to tip my cap to your new strategy of qualified hyperbole, as seen in “something of an albatross.” Almost as good as the earlier, “somewhat alarming” phrase you were using.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
POINT being...
Instead of obsession over “WHY” Derrek Lee continues in decline mode, the more productive exercise would be to determine solution. My view is that Lee is in non-recoverable decline phase. A 33 year old with his mounting injury list in recent years — hand, bulging disk — isn’t likely to find the fountain of youth and restorative waters. Here it is April and Lee is already banged up.
Solution?
A. Put Derrek Lee on the DL if indeed he does have a bulging disk problem
B. Move Lee down to the 6th or 7th hole in the lineup where he belongs at this stage
C. Identify somebody who can play a couple games a week at 1st base
But hey, if you want to keep up the grand debate on whether Lee is in decline then go for it.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 30, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what's ironic -
You won’t even debate whether he is or not, all while you keep confidently espousing that he is. You could take up defending your proclamations, or, hey, if you want to just keep assuming the worst about Lee (without proof) and that’s your thing, then you, too, should go for it.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read Lee's stats line the last two years...
Also, take a gander at what VivaPujols had to say on the subject. Good objective stuff that is hard to ignore.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 30, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
C is already resolved. Micah Hoffpauir is a good substitute first-baseman.
B may be addressed when Rami comes back to the lineup.
A is probably last resort, because Lee wants to play. It was surprising to me that Lou kept Lee off the field for an extra day.
Knowing WHY something happens is a pretty important component of deciding HOW to deal with it. But sweeping pronouncements are easier to do than research.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know that it is hard to tell by watching on TV
but his bat speed seems to be declining. Pitches that he used to be able to handle inside are now getting by. He has a challenge because he has longer arms and a longer swing, but those pitches he was turning on last year at this time seem to be tying him up since late last summer.
"I still don't know what happened"- Fergie Jenkins on '69
by tommy veryzer on Apr 30, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee is cheating up in the box on the fastball
Which happens with a lot of players as a concession to age and a micro-fraction loss in reflexes. That’s not what concerns me so much. What concerns me is that Lee is actually trying to guess pitches. Hence why he is having some real awkward looking whiffs on pitches that you never used to see out of him. This was going on last season too. The added problem is that major league pitchers are smart and can smell blood in the water. They know more about Lee’s current handicaps then you can imagine.
Whether Lee is hurt or not is irrelevant. Fact is he has battled a variety of health problems for four seasons now. The point is the alarming reduction rate of his productive value.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 30, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, whether he is hurt or not IS relevant.
If the neck and back problems are causing the hitting decline, then put him on the DL till he’s healthy.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
it could also be a combonation, some decline and some injury bug
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least
you made a decent literary reference, if its not altogether correct or accurate…
DLee’s year after May last year was pretty bad, but he still contributed to the team. He was far from an albatross, yes the DPs were frustrating but he hasn’t hit one this year.
I dont know if he has been hurt all year or just the past few games, but I do hope he will get healthy and contribute to the team. I think that is more of a possibility than some folks allow it to be.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His 2008 after April was pretty bad.
May 2008 was, by far, his worst month — .234 /.269 /.411 isn’t going to get much done.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 30, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially when the manager is insistent he is the # 3 hitter in the lineup and shall play everyday
Hence yet another argument for moving Lee down the # 6 or # 7 hole for good.
The window for winning a World Series may have waned.
by BLou on Apr 30, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
We more or less got away with him in the 3 hole last year because guys were producing around him. this year, however, the “hit or miss” nature of the lineup means that Lou is going to have to, sooner or later, make a concession and move him down.
People can debate whether he’s in decline or not all year but the simple fact is the the #3 spot in the order is supposed to feature a team’s best hitter. I can’t believe anybody here still thinks of Lee that way.
by bluekoolaide on Apr 30, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was told there'd be no math
I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Apr 30, 2009 10:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lee's
warning track power, to me, is
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Apr 30, 2009 11:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry
Lee’s warning track power is the most troubling thing I see in his 3 hole slot. When he has made good contact this season, his drives are not reaching the seats.
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Apr 30, 2009 11:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
at least two of those in Wrigley
were from the wind; remember that game the only HRs went into the right-field corner. And warning track power at the aircraft hanger they played at last night IS HR power in a lot of other fields.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which could be a sign of injury.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
or just bad luck
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 1, 2009 5:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or both.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on May 1, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
or neither
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts:
Forget the numbers for a second and watch his at bats. If you can’t tell that his bat is slow, you don’t watch enough baseball. Opposing announcers comment on it. I think even the FOX crew commented on it before. He gets fastballs right down main street and almost always fouls them back towards the first base line. That right there is all I need to see to know that he’s simply not getting the barrel of the bat around in time to truly drive it. And this isn’t an isolated thing that I’ve seen, it happens all the time.
Now, you might say ‘well the numbers tend to disagree with you over the years’. Fine. But everyone here (including myself) has proclaimed him an amazing (or at least very good) defensive first basemen in spite of the mediocre defensive numbers he has. That’s another case where I trust my eyes over the numbers sometimes. I know he’s still a very good defensive first basemen. The numbers disagree. But I watch him pick throws out of the dirt every game, plays that I see countless first basemen mess up rather frequently.
Now, do I think Hoffpauir should take over? Of course not. I’m willing to give Derrek the benefit of the doubt. I’m hoping that he turns it around – I really want him to. I’m just afraid that an .800 OPS is asking too much of him this year. And if his offense continues to slip that much, the Cubs have a serious problem on their hands.
Also:
but find me a player who had an OPS+ over 150 somewhere between his age 27-31 seasons, as well as above average seasons consistently for 9 straight seasons, and then never had another above-average season after he turned 33. Is there a single player in the modern era who fits that description?
I thought about this for 3 seconds before going here. In Andruw Jones’ age 28 season he had a 136 OPS+ while dropping 51 bombs, and we’ve seen him fall from grace like few others. And he’s actually a year younger than Derrek (32). He’s looked good this year, but that’s 39 plate appearances while mostly DHing. I’m not sure if this was the type of example you were looking for, and I didn’t think about it for too long, but it’s not impossible for a player around this age to lose their bat rather rapidly.
Ron Santo should sing TMOTTBG everyday. Period.
by Schwa on Apr 30, 2009 11:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jones never had the peak that Lee did, and we know why he fell off so badly - his condition was horrible Lee's condition is not horrible.
As for the “just watch the player argument,” I tend to discount what I see as being a lot of confirmation bias; it’s too hard to see where Derrek Lee is in the box, how fast his swing is moving, etc. Maybe you and others here are more talented at that than I am. I know that people can be trained to see the right things. I would love to have the opinions of opposing team’s scouts on Lee. I know that when Jayson Stark interviewed people in baseball, asking if Lee was done, the returns were mixed.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones finished ahead of DLee in MVP voting that year - he was 2nd, Lee was 3rd.
They both had incredible seasons.
When you watch Derrek Lee bat, do you not see him fouling back center cut fastballs? You don’t have to be a scout or baseball genius to see it. If Aramis Ramirez got those pitches, you would very quickly see the difference. There’s no bias involved. I WANT him to succeed, I WANT him to rip those pitches. I love Derrek Lee – he’s one of the rare athletes that is an actual role model, and not just a de facto role model because they’re a professional athlete. But the decline in his skill set is alarming.
Ron Santo should sing TMOTTBG everyday. Period.
by Schwa on Apr 30, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Dale Murphy qualifies.
157 OPS+ at age 31, and then 106, 89, 99, 103, and that was that.
I suppose that by the absolute definition, 106 and 103 are “above average”, but I think that he’s the poster boy for inexplicable rapid decline.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Apr 30, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
rec'd
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you..
regarding the wind. I was just pointing out that while most posters are concerned w/ what Lee’s not hitting, I’m a little concerned w/ the balls he is hitting well. Maybe it’s a coincidence that he’s only hitting balls solidly in such circumstances? I don’t know.
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Apr 30, 2009 11:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i doubt
that it is coincidence.
One of the nice functions of a windy ball park is that it becomes a pitcher’s dream. You can grove pitches and players can swing their hearts out and they are still catchable because the wind knocks them down. Good contact on a windy day is probably not a coincidence its just a function of a more aggressive pitcher.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Call.
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Apr 30, 2009 11:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sweet mother of cream corn...
…there’s so much good info and discussion in this Fanpost that I think I need to print it out and read it later. I can’t quite summon the energy to digest all of it right now. Thanks for doing this, though, DGU!
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 11:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
This is one of the best fanposts since if have been around. it also has had the best, friendliest and smartest discussion that I have seen on a controversial topic to date. Everyone has been so civil that it feels like we are arguing with adults.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
AUGH
you are so stupid, die you ledge jumped, I know you love DLee and hate Hoff so much you are hoping for a DLee injury to force Lou to bat Lee 7th
ok, feel more at home now?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post
Loaded with all sorts of good information. I was under the impression that DLee was in a decline. I am surprised to see the statistics do not back that up.
Good Work.
by jajonez77 on Apr 30, 2009 12:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
actually if you look up at vivaelpujols
his stats show the oopposite
this is a good debate here
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
There’s nothing definitive on either side. The statistics both show that he’s not declining in some aspects and he is declining in others.
Ron Santo should sing TMOTTBG everyday. Period.
by Schwa on Apr 30, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so for this topic is it confirmed
that we can have cake AND eat it too?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say this, and maybe vivaelpujols will confirm or deny -
part of where he and I seem to disagree is in what it means to be “in decline.” If by “in decline” we mean that a player at age 33, is not going to be getting any better in the long-run (although he may tick up or down in the short-run), then most people agree with that. I’m not arguing that Lee’s actually younger than he says.
But I wrote this post to argue that Lee’s most likely not in a precipitous decline, where he might end up out of baseball after this current contract. While it could be happening, it’s not the most likely occurrence. I’m not sure where vivaelpujols stands on that.
Derrek Lee is good.
by DGU on Apr 30, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BASICALLY
how each person defines decline is what makes the argument
natural decline in age, or declining that is escalating faster than the natural pace
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
You’re probably right about his small sample size this year not really meaning anything. Before this year, he showed a slight, but steady, downward trend in his skills over the past 3 years. However, this year it seems that he has fallen off of the cliff. I’m not sure if it means that he is in precipitous decline, or if he is just experiencing an extended slump. I would probably lean towards the latter.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 1, 2009 5:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting stat about DLee
From 2004-2009 his OBI% (runners on base batted in) has remained largely unchanged. Check it out
2004 – 0.15603
2005 – 0.16095
2006 – 0.15172
2007 – 0.16086
2008 – 0.15487
2009 – 0.15789
With the exception of 2006 that looks pretty consistent to me. This is by no means a defense or attack on Lee, I am just throwing one more stat into the mix. To put this into context. Rami tends to average around .18 or so.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on Apr 30, 2009 2:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Driving in runs isn't a skill
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 1, 2009 5:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
However, I think that OBI% reflects timely hitting. Also I did qualify throwing those stats out there as being fairly neutral, just that these situational numbers look pretty similar from year to year. I realize that RBIs really mean very little however I feel like there may be more meaning in OBI% but that could just be me.
Oriole by nurture. Cub by marriage.
by wax eagle on May 1, 2009 6:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I work for D-Lee; So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies. Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me…. You don’t. I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don’t know what you are talking about. This is how bad info gets passed around. If you dont know about the topic….Dont make yourself sound like you do. Cos some BCBers believe anything they hear.
the pink hat guy is my father
by joeschmitt on Apr 30, 2009 3:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Condescending much?
We’re on a blog. A blog is all about expressing your opinion. Unless you plan on enlightening us with your ‘inside’ knowledge (which I’m skeptical of), this post has absolutely no point.
Ron Santo should sing TMOTTBG everyday. Period.
by Schwa on Apr 30, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh.
This was a meme from sometime last year. It wasn’t funny then and it isn’t funny now, when no one but the poster remembers what it was about.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I vaguely recall joe claiming to work for someone or another.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Apr 30, 2009 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Dont make yourself sound like you do."
’splain Lucy. Please enlighten those of us who will believe anything we hear…
The Kool-aid stand is open for business…
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what is your position in DLee Inc
and if you are so knowledgable about where we are wrong, correct us. Otherwise you are guilty of just spreading rumors that we are without any intelligence, and you are just typing to hear yourself and pretend that you know everything as well.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um...
… it was a lame joke. Please ignore this part of the thread.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Apr 30, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
gotcha
ignored it is
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
by Cubbie-Tim on Apr 30, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
Great post DGU. Rec’d.
Boring replies everyone.
One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.
by chilango2 on Apr 30, 2009 3:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
welcome to the club, Shakespeare
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Apr 30, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the words of the great Chicago philosopher Abe Frohman
Bite me
:-) :-)
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 4:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
oops, so much for the reply button, chilango2
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I got it
I just don’t understand all the fighting and, frankly, it’s getting a bit jarring. Some people are being too aggressive lately.
One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.
by chilango2 on Apr 30, 2009 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
falling further behind the RedBirds and sitting at .500 gives many angst
let’s just hope the Cubs have a good home stand and the team gets healthy soon. this family feud is getting ugly.
but aren’t we supposed to be dysfunctional cub fans?
"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru
by LAcarl519 on Apr 30, 2009 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+ 100... 'cause it doesn't seem like we'll win 100 right now.
Timing is everything.
by __Sean__ on Apr 30, 2009 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
100 games?
100 games was a reach last year. I’ll be happy to win 92. Heck, I think 87 takes the division.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Apr 30, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not this year
The Cards already have too many wins in the bank.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 1, 2009 5:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they'll have their flat spots too
and if they don’t, well, then, they will have played excellent baseball all year, and more power to them.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 1, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs


