Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

OT -- Does Rondo have to actually kill someone on the court?

Before he gets thrown out of a game? Does he have to set up a Michael Vick rape stand?

Just when I start to show some slight interest in the NBA again, this crap happens. Just how badly does Stern want Boston and Cleveland in the Eastern Finals?

This series will be talked about for years to come, like the Lakers-Kings in 2002, or the Bulls-Knicks in 1994.

This is the kind of stuff that will eventually kill this league.

 

 

 

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 59 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Looks like

he threw a little punch there before backing away.

Can’t imagine the NBA would suspend him, though.

WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll

by Gibbon Jockey on Apr 30, 2009 9:49 PM CDT reply actions  

The difference

between professional basketball and professional wrestling appears to be dwindling.

by Cubinator on Apr 30, 2009 9:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Does OT stand for off topic or Over Time?....as in three of them so far tonight!

This is an epic series!

BTW – Rondo is a punk ass bitch

New sig currently under construction

by JB 23 on Apr 30, 2009 9:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Rondo is such a tool and a punk

Seriously the NBA should suspend him for Game 7. The problem is David Stern really needs his defending champs to play another round or two so that Garnett can possibly return.

I sure hope the Bulls win game 7, but it won’t be easy.

Hey Cubs could you start winning again? That would be real nice.

by nji232 on Apr 30, 2009 10:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Rondo grabs Hinrich's arm and slings him into the scorer's table. how can this not be

worth at least a one game suspension—even if it is a game 7? even without the backdrop of the previous crap he already pulled on Hinrich and Miller in prior games. That move looked totally pre-meditated, Shame on the NBA/WWE if they do not suspend him.

…my guess is they will not.

"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru

by LAcarl519 on May 1, 2009 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thank You

Rajon Rondo is the NBA’s new pet project, so Mr. David Stern is going to let him get away with murder.

I was so pissed when they didn’t toss his ass for trying to throw Hinrich to the ground. Remember Game 6 of the Suns/Spurs series a couple years ago, when Robert Horry hip checked Steve Nash out of bounds? Horry got a 2 game suspension for the hip check and a subsequent forearm to Raja Bell, which leads me to believe that each action cost him a game. Therefore, and also considering Dwight Howard’s recent supsension for the elbow to Iguadala, and further considering the clear video evidence, I would like to believe Rondo will be suspended for Game 7.

However (imagine Stephen A Smith’s voice) my money is on not a damn thing happening to him, although he has already tripped Kirk onto his face, and went upside Brad Miller’s grill the other night.

by CubsFan87 on Apr 30, 2009 11:10 PM CDT reply actions  

To be clear...

And I have not seen the Rondo play yet, Howard received his suspension for a blatant punch above the shoulders (elbow in this case). The play was over. Rondo’s hit on Miller, though excessive, was a swipe near the ball.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on Apr 30, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

3 feet = near?

When a 7-foot man has the ball placed on his palm with his arm completely outstretched in front of him, how far would the ball be from his face? About 3 feet, right?
My favorite part of the NBA’s explanation for not suspending Rondo for Game 6 was the Stu Jackson quote:

In terms of the criteria that we use to evaluate a flagrant foul penalty one, generally we like to consider whether or not there was a windup, an appropriate level of impact and a follow-through. And with this foul, we didn’t see a windup, nor did he follow through. So for that reason we’re not going to upgrade this foul to a flagrant foul penalty one.

Until you actually look at the play and see Rondo taking both a wind-up and a follow-through, that argument may actually have had some merit.
I’m just looking forward to the explanation as to why Rondo won’t get suspended for Game 7. (To be fair, Hinrich should be suspended as well.)

by rob9802 on May 1, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

yes it was hard for Rondo to follow through with his fingers firmly locked into Miller's mouth

what a joke.

…the NBA is WWE.

"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru

by LAcarl519 on May 1, 2009 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Meh...

I think it’s just playoff basketball. In 1985 or 1995 Rondo wouldn’t have even had a flagrant. Howard wouldn’t be suspended.

I know some people get turned off by all the physical contact, but I find it fascinating. These players are squaring off against the exact same people for up to 7 straight games; they develop a general dislike for one another and that often reveals itself in many skirmishes. I love to see it. I’m sure all the Bulls fans would love to stick a big W in Rondo’s face, just as Celtics fans would love to wipe that insane smirk off of Noah.

I’m a big NBA fan, but it’s hard to keep a close eye on things until the postseason. I love seeing skirmishes, I love seeing players go at each other, and I love when fans get absolutely entrenched hating the other team.

Remember Kurt Ramis getting taken down? Bird going at the Sixers? The Pistons throttling MJ until the sweep. It’s a natural part of playoff basketball. I agree that the league needs to make sure it doesn’t get to the point of injury; I think things really changed with the Pistons in 1990, because they took ‘being physical’ a bit too far.

You match up against the same player over and over….and a little disdain will certainly develop.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

So what's your argument?

… that Rondo shouldn’t be suspended because Ramis got taken down? That when sitting around a table trying to decide suspensions, NBA execs say, ‘ah hell, this is so damn captivating, let’s let them cream each other?’
I guess I don’t buy it. Surely, this is interesting stuff, and yes the animosity does make the series significantly more fascinating, but that doesn’t mean there should be no punishments handed down for what Rondo is doing. That’s just a silly argument to make.

by rob9802 on May 1, 2009 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

No...

I’m saying it’s the playoffs. It’s going to be physical. It always has been physical. The past serves as a precedent. Every team and every player has gone through it.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 2, 2009 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

it was not even close to the ball

unless you mean EYE BALL

even Larry Bird (former Celtic and HOFer) said the refs and the NBA botched that one

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

i think it is less Rondo and more Kirk

had ROndo thrown Rose, he is ejected. Stern would have cared more about the ROY being slammed than Capt Kirk (which is bullsh*t, each player is needed tio have a league Stern.)

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rondo's now on the shortlist of players that every Bulls fan loathes...

Laimbeer, Reggie Miller, John Starks, and now Rondo. Maybe Chuck Person too and guys from the ‘70s that I’m too young to know about. Anyway, Rondo will now be booed everytime that he plays in the UC for the rest of his career. Personally, I like that there’s a new villain because it sets up a rivalry with Rose that, hopefully, we get to enjoy for years to come.

At the UC, they didn’t show the replays of the scuffle with Heinrich and for good reason, as the crowd was so pissed off at Rondo by then that they probably would’ve started throwing stuff. Also, unless you were sitting courtside at that end, I can’t imagine being able to see Rondo touch the ball when it was in the cylinder in the 3rd OT. I certainly didn’t see it from the 300 level. Again, it was probably best that they didn’t show that replay even if it does help to explain why Hinrich missed that cripple.

Another strange thing was that this game wasn’t sold out until a day or two ago. I bought my tickets on Monday, after just checking to if, maybe, there was still a single seat available for the “if necessary” game. Turned out there were lots of tickets available and I was able to take my nephew. It says something bad about the state of the NBA, that a key game in one of the best playoff series ever between two big and popular franchises was barely a sell-out. Part of it probably has do with the Bulls having shed so many of their casual fans during the decade that they’ve spent in the wilderness…but whatever, I can’t complain about seeing such a fabulous game in person.

I should go to bed, I need to get some sleep but I’m still too keyed up. I doubt that I’ll ever walk out onto Madison St. again to hear hundreds of people chanting “Joa-chim
No-ah.” Fabulous.

"I'd rather play baseball than eat." - Andy Pafko

by LaddieRenfroe on May 1, 2009 3:04 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't know if its as much of that

as it is in hoops, the players can’t really police themselves as much w/o getting thrown out of a game.

Now, last night in game 6 what he did to Heinrich could make for a suspension, but who knows. Kirk took a technical on that while Rondo did get the flagrant. But unless there’s a suspension, players cannot police on the court like players in hockey.

For example, Rene Bourque of the Flames (and ex-Blackhawk as recent as last season), was running all over the place. In games 1, 2 and most of game 3, he got his stick up, took slashing penalties – 3 in game 3 alone, breaking a ’Hawks player stick each time – and generally always got in that extra shot after the whistle.

The ‘Hawks fixed that issue at the end of game 3. Adam Burish clobbered him with a cross-check into the shoulder, breaking his stick and leveling Bourque. It set off a scrum and basically elevated the rest of the ’Hawks players awareness this crap won’t be tolerated. Bourque was a non-factor the remainder of the series and in games 5 and 6 especially, the ’Hawks were more physical, clean but physical.

Basketball simply isn’t constructed to do this.

But then again the best way in hoops to get back at a guy like that is to block his shot late in a tight game, which the Bulls did.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 1, 2009 6:14 AM CDT reply actions  

One of the many reasons the NBA

just is painful to watch anymore, and the NHL is far superior. Crisper end-to-end action, few time-outs, constant motion. The NBA is slam-dunks and timeoutandtimeoutandtimeout andfreethrowsandfreethrowsandfreethrows.

But, in the U-S-A, the NHL is rated somewhere below NASCAR.

That being said, I am a Bulls fan but I rarely watch any more. Whe nit takes an extra hour to play the final 2 mins of any game and OT’s are so damn long, I’m out. (it shouldn’t take 30 mins to play 5 — It just shouldn’t. The older NBA never let that happen. Games moved along rapidly. ) However, I did juggle between the Bulls, Hawks and Cubs Thursday night.

A bad line change cost the Blackhawks that game, what a shame. But they will be back.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on May 1, 2009 7:28 AM CDT reply actions  

yes the NBA flowed a lot better when the players (and coaches) were coked up

and no one cared. the games moved pretty fast. everyone wanted to get out of there to get high again. :-)

"If it's obvious, it's obviously wrong." - a well known stock market guru

by LAcarl519 on May 1, 2009 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Miller...

Foul was blatantly flagrant. The ball was just about in the air already, and he swiped right at Miller’s face. Last night’s throwing of Hinrich into the scorer’s table should’ve warranted an ejection; if not that, then the punch he threw should’ve had him out of there.

Any other situation, I’d like to see Rondo suspended for the next game. But because this has been such an epic playoff battle, I think it would cheapen it a bit if one of the Celtics’ best players was out.

Best basketball game I’ve ever seen in my life btw, not most significant (Jordan era), but most exciting and emotionally draining ever.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on May 1, 2009 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

the Bad Boys in the last 80's early 90's (Pistons)

would be considered a Boy Scout Troop compared to modern basketball. The game is missing players like Magic, Bird, Jordan, Wilkins, Barkley etc to police the game so to speak.

None of the above players would have let Rondo get away with that last night, especially if Rondo was their teammate.

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 8:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Those players...

Don’t exist anymore, and if they exhibit any of that behavior, they are vilified as thugs and fined and/or suspended. Although I wish the Bulls were more physical at times, they showed tons of mental toughness and heart.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on May 1, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

they also worried more about winning the game

insteaed of winning a brawl (Pistons / Bulls series aside)

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta disagree Tim...

What has Magic and Barkley said in the TNT studio? “It’s about time things started getting physical.” Both of them echoed that thought….

Today’s game isn’t even close to being as physical. Watch McHale clothesline Kurt Rambis. Watch Larry Bird get flipped by Bill Laimbeer. Bird’s reaction? Starts PUNCHING the crap out of Laimbeer. Watch Dr. J and Bird start swinging at each other. Watch the baby Bulls getting knocked around by the Pistons, only to eventually turn the tables. Watch Reggie take down MJ.

I believe that not a single of those fights (and many more from the 1980s and 90s) resulted in suspensions. No, every player from that era knows that the game was more physical, and they truly enjoy seeing players mix it up nowadays.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't forget...

Knicks vs. Bulls in the early 90’s. Jordan and Pippen getting hammered on every play… Xavier McDaniels and Jordan standing nose to nose ready to go to war… Those were the days.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on May 1, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not only did he throw him into the thing...

But he dragged him from inside the three point line… such a dirty, dirty play. As much as I dislike Kirk Hinrich, I wish Kirk would’ve turned around and beat his ass.

by kanderber on May 1, 2009 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

See, that's the in-game player-policing

the NBA doesn’t have but the NHL does have. This kind of thing happens in the NHL, there’s a good chance one of his team mates on the ice at that time engages him in a fight, or at a later time in the game – like I mentioned above in the Flames series vs the ’Hawks – a player from the ’Hawks “settled the score”. The result? The offending player not only missed game from being hammered by the hit, he was ineffective in the 2 games that followed.

You really have to be a big time hockey fan to appreciate this. It’s when the league meddles in what can and can’t be done, season to season is where the players lose sight of what they need to do and what is tolerated or not; penalty (and suspension) wise.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 1, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

I still don't see why fistfights are necessary in the NHL.

Yes, hockey is a rough sport. But you’d think things could be “settled” in a way other than a fistfight, which is NOT a natural part of the game.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 1, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree.

It’s part of “the code” in hockey…Like brushbacks in the MLB. Sure, there COULD be better ways to settle things than literally fistfighing, but it helps protect your best players, etc…

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on May 2, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like you said...

… there COULD be better ways. I understand the “protection” idea. But fistfights turn me off to what is, when played well, a wonderfuls port.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 2, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

on the plus side

there are less fights and no true “goons” like there used to be, adn the NHL has placed some rules in place to try and stop or at least slow down the amount of fights

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 2, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

True.

It’s better than it was. But there’s still room for improvement.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 3, 2009 4:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

The opening up of the offencive

game was the biggest way to cut down on the overly defencive and sometimes “goon” like play. It forced the way the roster was constructed, meaning more speed guys.

One rule change effectively helped generate what I consider the game-winning goal last night by Bolland, elimination of the 2-line offside.

Putting rules into curb fighting will only result in more stick swinging incidents. So if the penalties for those aren’t proportionally increased, less fights are only going to mean more stick swinging.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 3, 2009 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not if the penalties for stick swinging are increased.

They could stop all of it by instituting severe penalties for that kind of thing. But they don’t seem to want to, because it seems that fistfights sell.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 3, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

What, they should have a postmortem

and discuss their “feelings”?

And it IS a natural part of the game. It’s been part of the game since its inception. That makes it natural.

It prevents an overly aggressive player for taking advantage of your skilled guys. I can’t say more about this than what Burish’s hit on Bourque did to that player – and their entire team’s psyche – for the remainder of the series. Now the Canooks are trying the same crap.

It came close to that again last night. The ’Hawks duly noted who was overly aggressive. Suffice to say if it happens again in game 3 on Tuesday, Eager, Byfuglien, Walker or one of the other top physical guys will be sure to protect the likes of Kane, Toews, Sharp or Havlat.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 3, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fighting has NOT been a natural part of the game "since its inception".

I watched hockey in the 1960’s and there were far fewer fights, not the drop-the-gloves fistfights you have now. That didn’t start till the goons of the 1970’s were hired.

I still don’t see why that is necessary.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 3, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

In the 1940's-1960's

there were far fewer fights because there were a max of 70 games in a season and until 1967-68 there were only 6 teams (called the golden age of hockey; 1942-1967). The league doubled to 12 teams in its first major expansion.

Fighting is down with the offencive-minded rules changes implemented after the season-long lockout. But it’s always been there. The rules were changed to open up the offence – just like in other sports – more people are attracted to higher scoring games. The rules were not overtly changed to curb fighting, curbed fighting is a consequence of opening up the game. Just like tighter calls on interference, left-wing traps or any traps in the neutral zone for that matter and the elimination of the 2-line offsides.

The reason it looks like a lot now compared to the pre-expansion era is there’s nearly 6 times more games in a season now; not 6% or 60%…..600%.

Yes, teams like the Broad St. Bullies mid-1970’s Flyers teams lead by Dave – the hammer – Schultz gets a bad rap from the fight-haters but that style has significantly changed. Its role isn’t as prominent but its still there.

This is the fastest team game in the universe, played on artificial feet, with player changes during live play on a rigidly confined playing surface. It needs real-time, on-ice player policing. It’s a huge part of the game and its draw.

Last but not least, there’s the respect factor (for the opponent and the sport) that isn’t quite as prominent now as it was a few decades ago. Hockey is far and away the league who’s players respect the sport the most (more than the other major 3) but even it has fallen a bit from the time when respect for the opponent and the sport itself was an all-time high for North American sports.

If it makes you happier, note the number of fights per playoff game is below that of the regular season. Special teams are key and no-one wants to take the extra penalty that may end up resulting in a game-changing goal.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 4, 2009 6:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd expect that in the playoffs...

… playoff hockey is fun to watch. You say players respect the sport the most. If that’s true, why do they resort to the equivalent of a barroom brawl to settle their differences? The “fastest team game in the universe” should be the draw, not fisticuffs.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on May 4, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

First, a bar room brawl?!

I’ll give you this: Leaving the bench, 3rd man in and an assortment of other rules put in place over the past 15-20 years have curbed significantly any fights of more than 2 players in a single scrum (>95% decrease).

You’re way off equating a normal 1-on-1 fight to a bar room brawl. Not even close. If one of the tougher Canuck players take liberties with a Kane, Sharp, Havlat, Toews or Bolland, I totally expect an Eager, Burish, Byfuglien, Walker, Seabrook or Ladd to step in there and answer. It’s somewhat similar to the brush-back / HBP. You know, the unwritten code of “one of yours for one of ours”. Tell me this, in the last 10-15 years how many bench clearing brawls have you seen in MLB compared to NHL, normalized to the number of total games played?

It’s this simple. When an opposing player takes too much of a physical stance with your highest skilled guys, especially if they’re in a vulnerable spot/position during the play, that opposing player should have his head on a swivel for the rest of the season.

Dan Clearly labeled Patrick Kane on 30Dec in Detroit. A hit that should have drawn a penalty. What the ‘Hawks didn’t do that time – that they do now – would be to absolutely hammer him with an open ice hit or a crushing shot along the boards. Whether or not that’d result in a fight is TBD. BTW, Kaner is still feeling the affects of that hit; playing in the Winter Classic only aggravated the condition.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on May 5, 2009 7:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously...

the play that turned the game was Noah’s steal, but how can Pierce be that stupid? I think he should have let him go and take the 2 point deficit, but if you’re going to foul, make it count. Don’t nudge him as he’s dunking on you; take him down and preven the basket, or foul him 20 feet before the rim. Brain lapse on Paul’s part.

Another thing: Allen has 50 some points and with the game on the line doesn’t get a touch? Rajon Rondo and his limited offensive game with a fadeaway on Rose? Ridiculous. Boston deserved to lose.

Third point: failing to foul Allen on his late 3 in the second OT almost cost Chicago the game.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 12:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes:
Third point: failing to foul Allen on his late 3 in the second OT almost cost Chicago the game.

It seems as though this is a concept VDN will never understand.

And on the sixth day, God created Joakim Noah...

by TheTruth11 on May 1, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually...

he did say that was the plan going in. It looked they attempted to foul right away and then let off. Might just have been failed execution.

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

"I don't care if it's wrong...

he looks like an elf, and deserves to be taken down."

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

And Ronda

was compared to looking like Whitney Houston this morning on tv.

by sue369 on May 1, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackie Moon you said

we could dance thru the Bulls

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on May 1, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Alright, Stern said he had my back tonight. I got this.”

"I'll never forget how I felt last October." ~Kosuke Fukudome

by Goodie1969 on May 1, 2009 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rondo is

a piece of shit – but he embodies the entire Boston team. Garnett was way better off back in the obscurity of Minn. Now he’s in the public eye, he shows me nothing but the fact that he has no respect for the league, or any other team.

I just don’t know how the bulls can beat both the Celtics and the league on Saturday – but how sweet would it be to watch that bunch of bitches get knocked out in the first round, on their home court, by a team before this series no one respected. Go Bulls!

"Writing is exciting and baseball is like writing. You can never tell with either how it will go or what you will do." -- Marianne Moore

by duboisdm on May 1, 2009 4:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Well the league

decided to take no action against Ronda so hopefully the Bulls can use that to fuel a fire.

by sue369 on May 1, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

How does Garnett

not respect the league?

Free Ronny Cedeno

by Kansas25 on May 1, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I agree

that Rondo’s flinging of Hinrich onto the scorer’s table was a cheap shot, you couldn’t be more wrong in saying that this kind of stuff will eventually kill this league. Go back and watch tapes of any playoff series back in the 90s- bulls-knicks, bulls-pistons, any game dennis rodman was ever a part of, the list goes on and on. bottom line is the NBA used to be way more physical and way more exciting to watch. I enjoyed it because the players were able to unleash their passion and intensity and the game was a true battle that you had to love as a fan. Nowadays the officials have started calling every little hand check a foul which has drastically altered the dynamic of the game—it is this, if anything, that will eventually kill the league.

by wewantwood on May 1, 2009 6:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Charles Barkley, after the game commented ...

on Rondo’s backing away from Hinrich, after Kirk came after him when he had been thrown against the table. Sir Charles said that, when you’re doing that, it means you can’t fight. You’ve got to love Charles.

By the way, on the Boston Globe’s Celtics blog, they just announced that the NBA will take no further action against either player (are you surprised?). And the way the blog described what happened is hysterical, but sad: “Rondo grabbed Hinrich’s arm and pushed him against the scorer’s table.”

LOL.

IF IT TAKES FOREVER!!

by Cubfansince1957 on May 1, 2009 6:40 PM CDT reply actions  

I saw that

on BAB. It also said Kirk was bouncing around like a boxer. They didn’t mention Ronda back peddaling like a little girl.

by sue369 on May 1, 2009 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

On the plus side

Noah did manage a beautious takedown of Rondo

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on May 3, 2009 9:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  282 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski