To the "know-it-all" fans...
So I just finished reading the argument that went on last night about Zambrano bunting for a hit…and I must say I have my own opinion on it and I will state that after I’m finished with my initial point, that being…
Why does any amount of playing the game allow you to justify an opinion on what should or shouldn’t have happened in a baseball situation? If you are teaching the mechanics of pitching or hitting, maybe having played or actually knowing what the correct mechanics are would be a prerequisite to stating a belief or opinion, but even in that there are differing opinions/philosophies. Because I’ve never been involved in politics does that mean I’m not allowed to vote? My expertise isn’t up to snuff, right?…wrong.
If you haven’t figured it out by now, there are lots of successful ways to coach and play baseball. The know-it-all coach/player doesn’t exist, whether they played the game or not. Like some of the participants in last night’s discussion, I played baseball through college, was very successful/talented, played with guys who were drafted, and I myself had an opportunity to continue playing Independent ball…big deal? Does that mean my opinion is more correct than anyone elses?? No. Maybe TEACHING certain mechanics of the game, yes. IF my experiences in baseball allowed me to teach those mechanics. But opinions aren’t fact, they are beliefs.
I believe Carlos is talented, but he’s also a loose cannon and pretty much crazy. Those qualities make him both successful and unsuccessful. When he is able to harness that energy and use it in a positive way, great, but when he starts breaking bats, kicking water jugs, punching teammates, not so much. But ,his injury was not because he’s immature, crazy, or “idiotic”, (by the way, tville, you wouldn’t call him an idiot to his face, let’s be honest here) he got hurt playing baseball. Yes, he’s paid to pitch, no doubt, but he IS a gifted offensive player, even if you say it like, “he’s a good hitting pitcher.”, he’s still head and shoulders above the other NL pitchers. His MAIN job is to put his team in a position to win games, and in the NL you are given the opportunity to help yourself out by hitting as well as pitching. He knew he was talented enough to get on base via a bunt and he did, he just happened to get hurt. Injuries happen all the time.
Some of you must think he’s a fortune teller and he decided to go ahead and bunt for a hit knowing he would get hurt doing so. Ridiculous. He’s an athlete…a pitcher, a hitter, a ball-player…a very, very competitive one at that. Saying he’s not paid to do that is like saying Soriano isn’t getting paid to bunt. Which I disagree with as well…I’m sorry, these guys are getting paid to help their team win games, simple as that. Having played at a “high level” you should know that, Reed’s.
I’m not trying to ruffle feathers or anything, but I played with a lot of guys who weren’t that smart, in both academics and baseball, but they were talented. Sometimes talent alone allows you to play at a high level, more times than not I’d rather have a semi-talented guy with high baseball IQ opposed to some super talented player with no IQ any day of the week. I’m not saying Big Z is either of those guys, I’m just saying a lot of “high level” don’t really KNOW baseball, they’re just good at it. Their opinions may be as off the wall as my grandma’s when it comes to baseball. Let’s remember one thing, we are all Cubs fan, and we all cheered when we saw he was safe, and all collectively let out an “oh $%&#” when we saw he was hurt. Let’s applaud the effort, hope it’s a non-issue and worry about more pressing issues…such as Gregg/Marmol being the new cardiac closers.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
103 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Paragraph breaks are your friend.
Also, there are already several posts on this topic. This should have been a comment under one of the other posts.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
sorry...
it was more directed toward the false sense of entitlement to those who played the game at a “high level”, not Zambrano’s bunt. By the way, I thought I was hitting enter, apparently I wasn’t, I wrote it during my prep period, not a lot of time to edit.
You can edit your post and make the corrections.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on May 4, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Do people not realize they can "preview" their fanposts before they publish them?
And even go back after the fact and edit them if they find mistakes?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on May 4, 2009 1:42 PM CDT reply actions
Can't.... read.... eyes.... hurt... please.... fix....
One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.
Hmm...
I’d LIKE to read this…but….meh.
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on May 4, 2009 1:44 PM CDT reply actions
Edited for clarity...
So I just finished reading the argument that went on last night about Zambrano bunting for a hit…and I must say I have my own opinion on it and I will state that after I’m finished with my initial point, that being…
Why does any amount of playing the game allow you to justify an opinion on what should or shouldn’t have happened in a baseball situation? If you are teaching the mechanics of pitching or hitting, maybe having played or actually knowing what the correct mechanics are would be a prerequisite to stating a belief or opinion, but even in that there are differing opinions/philosophies. Because I’ve never been involved in politics does that mean I’m not allowed to vote? My expertise isn’t up to snuff, right?…wrong.
If you haven’t figured it out by now, there are lots of successful ways to coach and play baseball. The know-it-all coach/player doesn’t exist, whether they played the game or not. Like some of the participants in last night’s discussion, I played baseball through college, was very successful/talented, played with guys who were drafted, and I myself had an opportunity to continue playing Independent ball…big deal? Does that mean my opinion is more correct than anyone elses?? No. Maybe TEACHING certain mechanics of the game, yes. IF my experiences in baseball allowed me to teach those mechanics. But opinions aren’t fact, they are beliefs.
I believe Carlos is talented, but he’s also a loose cannon and pretty much crazy. Those qualities make him both successful and unsuccessful. When he is able to harness that energy and use it in a positive way, great, but when he starts breaking bats, kicking water jugs, punching teammates, not so much. But ,his injury was not because he’s immature, crazy, or “idiotic”, (by the way, tville, you wouldn’t call him an idiot to his face, let’s be honest here) he got hurt playing baseball. Yes, he’s paid to pitch, no doubt, but he IS a gifted offensive player, even if you say it like, “he’s a good hitting pitcher.”, he’s still head and shoulders above the other NL pitchers. His MAIN job is to put his team in a position to win games, and in the NL you are given the opportunity to help yourself out by hitting as well as pitching. He knew he was talented enough to get on base via a bunt and he did, he just happened to get hurt. Injuries happen all the time.
Some of you must think he’s a fortune teller and he decided to go ahead and bunt for a hit knowing he would get hurt doing so. Ridiculous. He’s an athlete…a pitcher, a hitter, a ball-player…a very, very competitive one at that. Saying he’s not paid to do that is like saying Soriano isn’t getting paid to bunt. Which I disagree with as well…I’m sorry, these guys are getting paid to help their team win games, simple as that. Having played at a “high level” you should know that, Reed’s.
I’m not trying to ruffle feathers or anything, but I played with a lot of guys who weren’t that smart, in both academics and baseball, but they were talented. Sometimes talent alone allows you to play at a high level, more times than not I’d rather have a semi-talented guy with high baseball IQ opposed to some super talented player with no IQ any day of the week. I’m not saying Big Z is either of those guys, I’m just saying a lot of “high level” don’t really KNOW baseball, they’re just good at it. Their opinions may be as off the wall as my grandma’s when it comes to baseball. Let’s remember one thing, we are all Cubs fan, and we all cheered when we saw he was safe, and all collectively let out an “oh $%&#” when we saw he was hurt. Let’s applaud the effort, hope it’s a non-issue and worry about more pressing issues…such as Gregg/Marmol being the new cardiac closers.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on May 4, 2009 1:47 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
so voting is allowed with no education or understanding
relates to the bunt how? i really am confuzzled at times on BCB.
Can we vote pre AB as to what a player should do, text or twitter it to Lou, and he can then let the coaches know what sign to give the batter? And if that is so, can we also do the same pre pitch
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
not my point...
……..really not it at all….? Basically, I was saying just because you’ve never played doesn’t mean your opinion stinks, same thing with voting…just because you’re not in politics doesn’t mean your vote doesn’t count…get me?? Don’t use “playing experience” as a way of convincing others you’re correct. If that was the case, there would be no philosophies in baseball. There would be one universal way to play and everything else would be wrong.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I commented about robcast23's fanpost
and how it was a good one.
This one not so much.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living."
I don't think this is as bad as y'all are saying.
There are valid points here. The formatting obviously needed help (Thanks, SWL — I wasn’t going to get through the original), but there were two posters last night who insisted that they knew better because they played “at a high level” and threw out strawman arguments when people disagreed.
One final note on know-it-alls:

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
and now here's something we hope you'll really like....
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on May 4, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Note: Does not apply to Max.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
If SWL hadnt posted that
No way I would ever read that, grammar, punctuation and formatting really is not too hard to do.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living."
Only you have the power to change that.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
It takes a long time to say anything in entish....
We’ve only just finished saying good morning.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on May 4, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions
We've only just begun...
…to live…
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
That doesn't make sense to me...
but then again, you are very small.
TWSS
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I disagree.
I said that there were good points.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on May 4, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Ironic, isn't it?
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on May 4, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions
It's all good
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on May 4, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Be sure and keep us updated on that...
because, you know, the 1000 comments already spread around BCB on this subject just isn’t quite enough.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on May 4, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions
While I won't speak for others regarding your issue
I believe others who played the game can offer insight to those who haven’t played. I’m fairly certain no one is trying to force their opinion as much as state what they know. I don’t think anyone is out of line by stating with a high degree of certainty that what they state actually is fact.
I find this often when discussing other sports I’m not nearly as familiar with as baseball and hockey. Having played these 2 sports for some time I certainly understand some of the idiosyncrasies that are not nearly as obvious to me in other sports such as football or basketball. Much of my familiarity with baseball and hockey really comes from having played those sports.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
I agree
and i thnk the poster was stating how some make statements “i know beter from playing” like they are Al Bundy proclaiming his 4 TDs in one game. There is a way to pass the knowledge on without trying to say “i know all”
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
It's not those saying
“i played baseball so I know a lot about it.”
It’s those saying “what you’re staying is stupid, so obviously, you didn’t play baseball, and you should listen to me because I did.”
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
what you’re staying is stupid
awesome!
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
lol
Mr. Freud, Mr. Freud, call on line 2 Mr. Freud…
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
sorry, could not help it
Typo King had to let Drew know
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Several people cannot conduct a civilized argument.
They resort to personal attacks and name calling when they find disagreement. And some simply resort to trying to shut others up with the excuse that they know more or they know better. We have all encountered those persons everywhere, more than once.
When I find myself in the company of such persons I just stop arguing and excuse myself. I suggest Lows05 do the same when he finds himself arguing with such people in this board.
by Fraggin Judge on May 4, 2009 3:21 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
thank you, I couldn't agree more..........
you have to drink their kool-aid or they’ll attack every word you say.
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
by Clutche on May 4, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I don't have a problem with Z bunting per se..
I don’t have any problem with Z or as a matter of fact any pitcher in laying down a bunt or doing anything that’s part of the game ONLY as long as they are PREPARED to do that.
I think BB pretty much nailed this on yesterday’s broadcast. Like he said, I don’t have a problem with Z in a PH role as long as he is stretched out properly.
The problem is we can all run into problems if we do things that are way out of our routine. So if Z wants to be a complete player then he should be prepared to do whatever stuff he wants to try out on the field.
Z wasn't pinch hitting when he got injured. It was in the 5th inning of a game he started he was plenty stretched out.
Not sure how being stretched out to pinch hit has anything to do with Z getting injured.
by Acapulco Taco Pie on May 4, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions
again, sorry
I wrote this in about 5 minutes (and I’m sure it shows, no time for editing). I had a meeting I had to get to so it was more of a rant, than something well thought out.
But, yea sure, someone who played MAY (and hopefully does) have more of an idea of whats going on, but it certainly doesn’t prove they do. Philosophies vary from coach to coach, from organization to organization. These people are at the highest level and yet people disagree and critisize. What makes any of us as fans think the non-players are boneheads? As a former player myself I was a little peeved, plus I disagreed with their opinion.
not unreasonable at all, but disagree and the attacks begin
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
btw...
Thanks SWL, I plagurised yours and edited the post.
"Plagurism" is contagious
much like the Plague and Mexi-Flu.
One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.
Message boards and blogs
Everybody keeps ranting about the fact that BCB is not a message board and people shouldn’t treat it as such.
Yet when I come to the home page to log-in, the link in the left hand navigation says “Start posting about the Chicago Cubs”. Maybe that ought to change to something like “Participate in the conversation.”
Just a thought.
Ladies and gentlemen! It's 1985 all over again, but this time the offense goes to hell!
Send this suggestion to...
… support (at) sbnation (dot) com
It’s a good idea.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Same old results to a well intentioned post.............
With the exception of a few serious responses, the regulars here ignore the content and badger the poster.
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
uh
whut?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I didn't expect you to understand
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
have you actually
READ the responses? Wait, let me back up.
Have you actually READ the post?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions
don't back up.........
you may fall off the cliff….second thought
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
yeah
that’s what I thought.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 4, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions
there are five that loosly qualify as above 8th grade responses..........
and you didn’t have one, unless you think this qualifies:
It’s not those saying…..
"i played baseball so I know a lot about it."
It’s those saying "what you’re staying is stupid, so obviously, you didn’t play baseball, and you should listen to me because I did."
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
too many ellipses in this comment.
-100 BCB Points.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on May 4, 2009 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on May 4, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Hey, guys. No need to fight anymore.
I just found a news clip of Carlos explaining his whole thought process behind the bunt that got him injured. I think his eloquent explanation should put this entire debate to rest once and for all. I know I feel a lot better after watching it.
OK, here’s the link.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
sigh
Youtube blocked at work.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Aw man.
Looks like no one fell for it. I just lost my daver.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Oh, I clicked on it.
just couldn’t see it.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Since I was specifically called out.............
………..by the author of this post, I feel compelled to comment.
First of all, and as I mentioned in another post, I have not referred to my baseball skills as the foundation for my position on this subject. Such experiences can be relevant to the discussion, but it is not the sole basis for anyone to have an opinion. I’ve not condemned others for not playing/coaching/etc., so that matter needs to be cleared.
That said, informed opinions, regardless of subject matter, should be given some priority.
Lastly, set up the interview with Z and I’ll be there. Give me a week to clear my schedule, but I have NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER in raising Zambrano’s level of awareness. As mentioned in another post, SOMEONE needs to be letting him know when he’s out of line, so why not me? His lunacy has rarely helped the club, and this is simply another example. I’d hope I would not have to call him an “idiot”, but I probably could not avoid calling his play, at times, “idiotic”.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
"First of all, and as i mentioned in another post, I have not referred to my baseball skills as the foundation for my position on this subject."
“That said, informed opinions, regardless of subject matter, should be given some priority.”
Wow. Did you intend that to be funny? Because you denied doing what you thought you were being criticized for and then, just a few sentences later, claimed that if you had done what you were accused of, you would have been right to do so.
That’s either genius or idiotic. I’m not sure which. It certainly does make you an asshole, but I’m not sure which adjective to associate with the noun.
Maybe Al should put up a poll to resolve the issue. Asshole-Genius? Or Idiotic Asshole?
As for you Lows05, I can appreciate where you’re coming from. I agree with you, as it happens. Not on the specifics of whether Z should have bunted or not, but on the issue of whether the arguments of an ex-jock or even a coach should be attributed to weight than those who have never played the sport. I personally don’t think they should, unless they prove themselves over time to be correct more often than their counter-parts. But that’s not usually the way the world works. Look at the sports networks and play by play booths. There are 20 Dandy Don Meredith’s for every Howard Cosell, though John Clayton still has a job while Seas Salisbury lost his not all that long ago, so there is some reason to hope. I will say that anyone who resorts to mentioning their “locker room” or “on field” experience in an argument like this is almost always in the process of losing their argument. Usually if they really had the expertise they were trying to claim by making such a reference, it would be so obvious they wouldn’t mention it at all.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on May 4, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I did not say............
……….you should consult me for baseball advice, but certainly informed opinions on ANY subject deserve priority. After all, would you contact a mortician to get an estimate for auto insurance? I’d suspect not.
If you concluded from my remarks that I was the priority source, well, that’s within your right to interpret , I guess.
I just hope the “name calling police” show up with great haste because I think you’ve overstepped your bounds.
In close, accusations without proper foundation are inappropriate, and I had not claimed my involvement in baseball made me any more of an authoritative figure than anyone else posting.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
You also suggested that yours was more informed.
And it’s my opinion that those who try to win arguments by claiming to be more informed, are in the process of losing the argument in which they are engaged.
Claiming to be more informed, which you have done twice now, isn’t arguing your point logically. It’s essentially an ad hominem attack against the person who disagrees with you. It’s also generally a sign of a lack of intelligence, or at least an unpleasant personality.
I may have overstepped my bounds, but that doesn’t mean I was wrong. :)
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on May 4, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Uhm........
…………I specifically stated that “I did not say you should consult me for baseball advice”.
Didn’t the mortician/auto insurance thing turn on a light? Seek the most informed opinions at all times, but, and at the risk of redundancy, I’m not saying I’m the opinion to seek on the subject of baseball.
I’m not “losing an argument” because I’m not making one. I’m simply stating I didn’t use my experiences as a foundation, a matter on which I have been falsely – and now repeatedly – accused.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
You know what?
I think you’re right. I scrolled through the discussions in other threads more or less convinced that I had previously read you making the ad hominem argument, only to discover that I had confused you with another person.
Many apologies. And now I get to suffer the ignominy of being banned for calling a guy an a-hole when he didn’t deserve it. Who’s the a-hole now? Come get me Al. I’ve got it comin’.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on May 4, 2009 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions
No problem. Apology accepted.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
Hey!
Glad to see you two worked this out yourselves.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Well, Al, I think Ted............
……….should buy me a beer, since Ted was, after all, a Cardinal and a Brewer.
That said, he was one of my favorite players in my younger days, so I took that into consideration when closing out our issues.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
you
are (thankfully) not in any position to tell a professional ball player when he is “out of line”. That’s his manager’s job.
His manager’s response to this whole situation is:
“Look, we had no choices,” [Piniella] said. "We’re trying to win baseball games, and he’s a good pinch-hitter. That has nothing to do with him getting hurt… He laid down a good bunt, it was a 2-2 ballgame. I know a lot of people say ‘Why did he bunt?’ Well, if he had hit a ball off the wall and hurt it trying to go into second with a double, (would they say) he should’t have hit a double?
“I don’t get the reasoning.”
Now, maybe you want to accuse Lou of being wrong, and Zambrano of lying about it like Reed’s Johnson, but you’ll have to find your own shovel.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions
You accused Me.......
And lately, all you’ve BEEN is Comment Police.
And here you are, 12 hours later, throwing in your two cents worth. That’s calling the kettle black my friend.
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
accused you of what?
Once again, there’s a difference between saying “I disagree with your comment and here’s why” and saying “your comment is mean” or “you’re an idiot”.
I comment when I have time to comment. I spent yesterday coaching my son’s little league team, and then spent the evening with my wife. So what?
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions
see above.........you said, "And lately, all you’ve BEEN is Comment Police"
so don’t get on my case for commenting as well. At least I comment in the moment so if I disagree the other poster they can debate and defend.
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
Listen you two,
if you can’t sit together in class, we’ll have to split you up.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
how about a different class teach...........
please
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
At least I comment in the moment
Truer words were never spoken.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions
you're getting soft.........
compliments aren’t your style
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
it wasn't
a compliment.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions
duh.....
no kidding
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
it's not always easy to tell
what you do or don’t get.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Well, I think one thing you can tell for sure.........
I’m on to your game
If you had to choose just one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.
um...
yeah… ok….
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 5, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Do you read?
Honestly, do you read these posts or just fire blithely into the crowd?
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
it's not my fault
if you can’t comprehend context.
Z was playing the way his manager wants him to. You can argue all you want. It doesn’t matter.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 6, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions
The poster claimed..............
………..I would not call out Zambrano in person if the opportunity presented itself.
I said, rather emphatically, that I would.
THIS HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS MANAGER, but it does prove you don’t bother to read what is written.
I AM BASEBALL PLAYER.
I PLAY HARD
I HIT BALL
I RUN HARD
Take off the blinders, dude…….
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
I refer you to my previous content.
I took the statement and expanded on it.
Z has made statements that deny your position.
Lou has made statements that deny your position.
I’d look forward to you calling Z out in person, but you also know you’ll never get the chance. Faux bravery is like fool’s gold.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 6, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Hardly bravery, pal.
And it’s not my fault if I don’t get the chance. I’d welcome it, and without autograph (unless he wanted mine).
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
uh-huh.
keep dreaming.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on May 6, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions
No problem. Apology accepted.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
Between the lines, this is really a good fanpost
It speaks to the larger issue of the merits/drawbacks of what Cosell called “The Jockocracy”. Are athletes better credentialed to talk the game by virtue of their career? What role does on-the-job experience play in the success of an analyst? Do you, as a fan, place more credibility in Joe Morgan or Peter Gammons?
Most of the ex-players are pretty crappy analysts
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 4, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Depends upon the subject matter.
About the “game”: Morgan.
About “baseball”: Gammons
I’m no fan of either gent, actually, but if I can draw this line of distinction, that’s how I see it.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
Looking back through this I'm stunned.
that you would give more credence to Morgan because he played the game.
This the same Joe Morgan who has been documented inventing stories and anecdotes and trashing other players in a vain attempt to improve his legacy.
Joe Morgan was a great player, but is an insufferable tool who sprinkles in true knowledge with crap he makes up. Without careful analysis and research, you can’t take a word he says as fact.
Gammons, whatever else your thoughts, is a historian of the game. While Boston/New York focused, his knowledge is usually based on fact and interview, not the fuzzy mind of a rambling napoleonic former second baseman.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
That's not what I said.
In fact, if anything, you have supported my thoughts perfectly, if you accept there is a distinction between “the game” and “baseball” itself.
I’m well aware of Morgan’s antics, but as a player, I’m going to give (at least some) credence to his comments in this aspect.
Further, I know full well of Gammons, which is why I would prefer to hear from him when the general topic of baseball is in play.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
I guess it's this thought process
that has allowed Morgan to continue to torture us on Sunday Nights. The concept that because he played the game at a high level, he’s more knowledgable about the game in 2009 than anyone else.
This mind set has allowed good players to become front office people in pro sports without other credentials (Jordan, Thomas in the NBA), Matt Millen in the NFL.
I much prefer the Theo Epstein example in Boston.
I’m okay that we disagree, but most of my point was your pick of Morgan. Of those two, I believe the only answer is Gammons. If Ernie Banks, Derreck Lee, or Kerry Wood were the options, I wouldn’t have commented at all.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
I only used Morgan............
………..because he was suggested in the original post on this thread.
Trust me, I’m nooooo fan of his and would prefer any of the folks you mention, along with hundreds of others in his stead.
In as much as I would have loved to spend an afternoon with Jerome Holtzman discussing baseball and it’s history, I’d have been equally thrilled to be out on the town with Mickey Mantle, learning about the game itself.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
While being out on the town with Mantle would be something
exciting and requiring a day off of work after, I’m not certain what Mantle out on the town has to do with the discussion of whether his being a great player makes him better credentialed to discuss the game.
Mantle himself admitted he squandered his incredible talent and if he’d trained and taken care of himself, he would have had a longer and more productive career. Further, he admitted having been hung over on many occasion during games. I only bring that up to point out his memory of events may be flawed from the over hang.
I have to ask another question. By “game itself” are you referring to baseball in its entirety (strategy, positioning, technique, managing, scouting, etc.) or just anecdotes and funny stories of things that occur in the clubhouse dugout, field and traveling?
As for the entirety, I don’t believe being a player is a credential that trumps one who didn’t play. As for the wacky stories of the type that Duke Snider used to tell on Larry King, only a player in that position is qualified to tell them in the first person.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
Many potential splits to make..............
…………because there are many facets that I, personally, would love to hear more about from all the game’s “inner circle”.
“Game itself”, especially as you pose it, leads me to think of such a split. The stories and day-to-day living would be great stuff – no doubt. However I’d also love to learn more about the “mechanics”, if you will, of how the game is played from those who executed at the highest level.
Let’s face it, there are so many paths, each of them filled with enrichment, and in each case, there’s probably a number of guys we’d prefer to have telling the tales, based on the specific subject matter.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
Interesting post...
I LOVE Z. If he was on another team, many of us would be in awe of him and wished like hell that he was a Cub.
HE IS. Enjoy this while it is here. A “pitcher” like this is rare indeed – no problem with his bunt – a thing of beauty (DID YOU SEE THAT, Sean MArshall?!), nor his PH-ing.
But what is this?:
… I believe Carlos is talented, but he’s also a loose cannon and pretty much crazy."
He is GIFTED, in my opinion – more than “talented”. What do you mean, “pretty much crazy”? Are you a psychologist? Because he gets emotionally involved too much in his craft? So, have you watched much NFL this year? Under your definition, 75% of the league must be “pretty much crazy”, too. I just think you are thinking its 1973, maybe. It is not any more. Sorry.
eh...
it’s a matter of word usage. “Talented” to me is the same as “gifted”. We can both agree he’s been blessed with ability at baseball. About the “crazy” thing…no, not a psychologist, I was using the term pretty loosely. I don’t mean he’s genuinely insane, but he wears his emotions on his sleave. I do believe this can be both good and bad, but with his track record of inconsistency and not living up to his full potential seems to be pretty evident that it’s more of a hinderance. I do love the guy though, great competitor and athlete. Also, I do watch the NFL and I’m not really sure what 1973 has to do with anything? I wasn’t even alive in ‘73. I’m a very intense person, was as a player, but I think in baseball, more than any other sport, you need to be pretty “Even-Steven”.
This is the best post I have read in a long time.
And Kudos to Lows05 for writing it. FWIW, here is my quick take on this whole “Monday morning quarterbacking” situation regarding Z’s bunt single, and the resulting injury. I was having this same conversation with an annoying co-worker who is a White Sox scumbag—I mean fan—who was basically saying Z is an idiot for trying to bunt, now he screwed the Cubs by putting himself on the DL and blah, blah, blah.
Lows05 nailed it when he said we all cheered when we saw Z beat out the throw, and let out of collective expletive when he saw that he was hurt. If anyone saw the back page of the Tribune on Monday, there is a beautiful shot of Z beating the throw that perfectly captures the reaction of the crowd behind first base. Great photo. The fan reaction is 100 percent positive, as I imagine it was to the millions watching on TV like me. Cub fans love Z because he has only one way of playing, and that’s all out, all the time. Telling him to “take it easy” would be like saying to Michael Jordan, “you know MJ, you need to rest up and pace yourself on the defensive end so you’re fresh in the fourth quarter.” Not going to happen. He only had one gear on the court and that was full throttle and people loved him for it. It’s the same thing with Z. He doesn’t know how to go any less than 100 percent at any time. That’s how he is, and I wouldn’t change it for anything because he just wouldn’t be Big Z without that “no holds barred” attitude. I admit, sometimes it gets him into trouble on the field. We’ve discussed this many times, but without that competitive fire of going all out, I think he’d get himself into even more trouble.
Now the idea that the whole bunt attempt was stupid is like this: would anyone still be talking about it in a negative way if he had not gotten hurt on the play? Or would the talk revolve around how great it is that he excels in all phases of the game, puts himself on the line and does anything to help his team win, and if only we had more guys with Z’s “win at all cost” attitude we could win the World Series? No, it only becomes a stupid play AFTER something bad happens, like the basketball player who heaves a three-pointer with 15 second left on the shot clock. If he misses, it was a stupid shot. If he makes it, it was clutch and heroic.
Folks, Big Z is not stupid, and the bunt was not a stupid play. He’s a great player, and it was a great play with a bad result. Is he occasionally reckless? Yes, but so are a lot of guys. Without that recklessness, I guarantee you he would not contribute as much to the Cubs as he does with it. I give you one Devin Hester as another example of how much a once reckless guy contributes once he loses that recklessness. The difference is, Big Z still has it even after he got his big payday. Bottom line, am I happy that Z got hurt? Of course not. Would I change him if I had a chance? Not a chance.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by 

















