Top Prospects part 1
I don't feel like talking about the Cubs current struggles so I decided to break down their future. I've never done this before and I'm sure there are those out there with a much better grip on these things. However, here are my top ten prospects half way through the season. I've got them ranked 1-30 and I'll be posting the other 20 in two more parts. Hopefully this will provide positive things to talk about as we look at what could be down the road. You'll notice a strong pitching presence in the top 10. When ranking my players I've given the benefit of the doubt to younger players over older players and starting pitchers over relievers. Anyway, here you go:
- Josh Vitters – the consensus top prospect in our system and will hopefully not be used for trade bait. If he stays on course, he should be at 3rd in 2012. Currently coming out of a slump at Peoria he is hitting .316 with 15 homers however he is striking out 15% of the time.
- Jay Jackson – Hopefully he can stick as a starter because the Cubs don’t have many starters on this list. After a slow start he had been mowing people down until a rough start last time out. Still before that he had a 2.95 ERA, 1.18 WHIP, and .227 Avg/Against while striking out almost 1 per inning. He has the stuff to be a nice #2 in the league. He got better as he moved up last year and should be in the bigs at some point this year even if it’s just in September.
- Chris Archer – Came over in the DeRosa trade (shhhhhh, don’t tell the DeRosa lovers) and has been nasty. He walks to many but at the age of 20 he has a 2.19 ERA, 1.28 WHIP and a sick .174 Avg/Against. He’s been on a pitch count but he’s struck out 66 in 53 innings while walking 36. He has ace stuff if he can cut down on the walks. Oh yeah, and he hasn’t given up a HR yet this year.
- Andrew Cashner – The Cubs top pick last year struggled a bit in the minors after getting drafted but has been mowing people down so far this year. I’m not sure if he’ll stick as a starter but he’s got a power arm and if he’s not a starter he’ll be the closer. In Daytona he’s got a 1.50 ERA, 1.08 WHIP, and .201 Avg/against. He’s only pitching 3 or 4 innings a start so it’ll be interesting to see how he does when he has to go through a lineup up 2 or 3 times.
- Starlin Castro – Barely 19, the Cubs challenged him by placing him in High-A to start the season and he hasn’t missed a beat since June started. He earned an All-Star bid and as we all most likely know was awarded the MVP for the game. He’s striking out about 11% of the time. It would be nice if he could learn base stealing a little more as he’s only got a 66% success rate. From what I understand he needs to work on his fielding. Hopefully he won’t remind any of us of another Cubs shortstop prospect whose last name started with a “C” and ended in an “O”.
- Chris Carpenter – Drafted last year out of Kent State, Carpenter is a nice looking starting prospect. I originally had him ranked a little higher before giving the nod to Cashner and Archer. But, he has been lights out at Peoria with a 2.44 ERA, respectable 1.19 WHIP and solid .210 Avg/Against. He’s struck out 60 in 73 innings while walking 33. He has good size and I would think he’d be up for a promotion shortly.
- Chris Huseby- Struggled last year, but has been dominant relieving at Peoria. He owns a 2.28 ERA, ridiculous .98 WHIP, and respectable .231 Avg/Ag. He is intimidating on the mound at 6-7 and has make you miss stuff with 39K in 27 IP while only walking 2 batters. That’s right 2 BB’s all year. That’s not a typo. He’s only 21 and looking at his stats most of his ER’s have been given up on days he worked after long layoffs as in 4-7 days off. He’s a future closer.
- Tony Thomas – Sort of up and down so far during his professional career. He needs to be more consistent. He has a nice bat and will get as far as it can take him. He’s having a nice year at AA batting .271/.346. He has been leading off most of the time but strikes out way to much with 69K’s in 266 AB’s. An RH batter he is crushing lefties and struggling against righties. He’ll need to get that straightened. Once he does, I would think his bat would be ready.
- Casey Coleman – Perhaps you should call him a “gamer”. His stuff won’t blow you away. His K rate is down this year compared to last but he owns a 2.8 ERA, 1.28 WHIP, and .255 Avg/ag. He progressively got better as he moved up the chain last year and looks to be a solid starting prospect for the future especially since he’s still only 22.
- Blake Parker - #10 was a hard one for me to place. I went back and forth between Parker and a couple other guys. Ultimately, Parker is a very nice eighth inning bridge to the closer type prospect. He’s 24 now and pitching well in AAA with a 1.62 ERA, 1.26 WhIP and a .197 Avg/ag. He needs to cut down on his walks, if he can do that he’ll be set as he strikes out more than 1 per inning.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
6 recs |
81 comments
Comments
Deja vu all over again
$136 million payroll for a .500 style ballclub. Good work Jim.
by BLou on Jun 29, 2009 4:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How would
one informed on the topic say our minor league system is doing compared to the rest of the league? Are we a minor league system on the rise?
Last I heard the Rangers had the best system in the MLB, and we seemed mediocre. Is this still true of our position?
This fanpost is much appreciated after the garbage folks have been posting recently.
Kudos!
"This is an environment of welcoming, and you should just get the hell outta here." --Michael Scott
by Reddevil on Jun 29, 2009 4:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
BA ranks #27
Nuff said.
$136 million payroll for a .500 style ballclub. Good work Jim.
by BLou on Jun 29, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
our system has changed a lot since then
the dero deal the draft this year. big developments from many of our guys. i personally say its on the rise. its not that good, but improving IMO
by Glacier on Jun 29, 2009 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a fair way to put
it’s not a good system, but there’s some hope in the tunnel, hope that wasn’t there in recent years.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup. Maybe a low teens now...
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect not that high
Maybe high teens. The lack of any near-ready top prospects will still hold it back.
by rlpete on Jun 30, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's what I meant.
17-18-19 (low teens.) Badly worded, sorry.
And I mean by next year if the major jumps by Castor, Vitters, Jackson continue to be made. Then get another surprise or two (Lee?) and we may make that jump up.
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.....not pretty
But breakout years from Jackson, Castro and Vitters will certainly help
churchofbaseball.com
by MJMars on Jun 29, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
These high K rates for our hitters...
is this common for young minor leaguers like this, or is this common to the Cubs system only? It seems like low OBP/poor plate discipline is common to almost every Cubs prospect. Cubs problem, or common minor league problem? Curious as to your thoughts.
by reedjohnson on Jun 29, 2009 4:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
only high k rate
is thomas…
11% and 15% are in the low to moderate range
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jun 29, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs' K rates seem right on par with the league.
The Cubs don’t really emphasize OBP and plate discipline, but most of the league doesn’t either. Most of the league still emphasizes “tools” and potential over stats.
by Poloplaya14 on Jun 29, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
people complain about the DERO trade but
the three guys we got for him archer, stevens, gaub have all had good years. sure the deal wasnt smart for us to do for the major league roster but its not like we got robbed
by Glacier on Jun 29, 2009 7:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And...
DeRosa was just shipped again for MUCH less.
by Poloplaya14 on Jun 29, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
um what?
Perez and potentially Jess Todd or Francisco Samuel? I didn’t like the DeRo trade but thought the value was okay. That said, Chris Perez is a far better talent than anyone we got. Archer has huge upside, but is a long ways away, and Gaub/Stevens are middle relief types (and in Gaub’s case, LOOGY).
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Cubs got more.
3 decent+ prospects>one good one.
by Poloplaya14 on Jun 30, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'll respectfully disagree
i’m fine with the cubs return, this isn’t some sort of gripe about it, but most indications are that the Cardinals are going to get two quality chips in return, Perez and whoever the 2nd guy is. From a value perspective (keeping in mind that I’m somewhat lukewarm on Perez), they are, by most accounts, getting 2 assets in the upper minors with quality upsides. Now, I don’t necessarily love the deal for the Indians, as I would’ve rather seen them go after potential starting ability even though their bullpen is bad. That said, from a value perspective, i’ll take the Perez and the rumored 2nd quality chip over what we got. Doesn’t mean those two will end up being better – trades are so often judged with the benefit of hindsight, which isn’t fair.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I haven’t been following Samardzija much, but I can’t believe he has fallen out of the top ten prosepcts. Hopefully he can turn it around
by EamusCatuli23 on Jun 29, 2009 7:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No third pitch.
He doesn’t look like a potential starter anymore because of that. I still think he could be a dominant late-inning reliever though.
by Poloplaya14 on Jun 29, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harden has a pretty good career
on 2 pitches.
DEJESUS!!!
by tomas21 on Jun 30, 2009 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he's a reliever
which is what Shark will be, most likely.
by Poloplaya14 on Jun 30, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yabbut they have to be two really good pitches that can be located really well. Shark's two
pitches are not in the same league as Harden’s two pitches. A lot of starting pitchers can survive on a good fastball and a good changeup. The two look identical coming out of the guys hand. Santana and Harden have such good changeups that even if you know it’s coming you can’t hit it.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Jun 30, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference is
Samardzija doesn’t have consistency with his splitter or command with either pitch.
by Ryjo on Jun 30, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harden uses a fast ball, curve ball and changeup
check my math but I think that adds up to three pitches for Harden, not two.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Jul 1, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind that this is a personal opinion
from a guy who admittedly has “never done this before.” Take most of these (including the one that I posted just last week here )with a grain of salt unless it has toonsterwu or someone else like that in the author line. Not being catty. I love to see this kind of stuff and get different people’s opinions. It’s why I didn’t try to rank them though.
I think that Shark is still a top 10 prospect. His numbers in AAA aren’t bad and he is supposed to be working on his secondary pitches. If he really is, then the numbers (particularly recently) are encouraging. I still think that Shark has the potential to be a mid-rotation starter. When you think back, though, who thought Z had the potential to be an ace starter in 2000 or 2001?
Projections are just that: educated guesses. It is great to hear what others think. Keep ’em coming, hat…
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wanted to take a moment to note
a thanks for the call out, but also that, I’m just a fan, and that there are others on this board that probably deserve a shout out more in terms of their knowledge of our system (guys that come to mind: Raisin, Outshined One, Slamdog, mjmars). I also wanted to reiterate that people need to remember that the most important usage for prospect lists is, well, to generate discussion, and that judging prospects is a very subjective manner. Everyone judges differently.
This leads me into the fact that I should’ve commented on the OP’s list as well, rather than delving into my own. Obviously, I have some disagreements as noted below, but I wanted to take a moment to say that the list is alright. Archer’s upside isn’t something that’s really debated – it hasn’t been since he was drafted. The upside is big, but he’s not there yet. The omission of Samardzija is a bit surprising.
The three names that might generate the debate would probably be Huseby, Thomas, and Parker. The thing to remember is that past our top few guys, the system is a jumble. Thomas’ potential is excellent, and he showed earlier this year that his K/BB can be alright. I’m just wary after the huge collapse he went through. If he puts it together, he’s a very solid talent. For me, readiness should be a factor in prospect lists due to risk consideration, and to that extent, I can buy Parker as a C+ talent that gets the readiness edge over other guys. The only one I can’t really work my head around is Huseby, as his pen upside, I’m not sure he’s a future closer. As noted, I’d rather see him get worked as a starter a bit more, if they feel he’s mentally tough enough to go back to that route. That said, if you buy Huseby as a potential elite closer, I guess I could see an argument.
Anyhow, I’d encourage the OP to post part 2, which could also be used as a thread to have a strong minor league discussion in the rec’d area.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no prob
you sure know your stuff … it’s odd, for a big market club like the cubs, there doesn’t seem to be much cub prospect discussion except on cubs oriented sites, and even then, it seems to only be a smattering of folks. heck, even getting ba or bp to answer a cubs question sometimes is hard. granted, part of that is due to our system’s struggles the last few years, but yeah, it’s easy for me to remember/appreciate who knows the system real well.
as for huseby, i gotta imagine that the pen role was a way to ease him back in and see if they can build some confidence back. he didn’t start off closing earlier this year. without checking the box scores to actually know, i gotta think that most of his early season work was in low pressure situations. he generates good downhill movement, but because of all the moving parts, i’m just not sure he’ll ever be a guy that can pump mid 90’s to really be a top pen type. maybe i’m dead wrong there, but i just don’t see it happening. i just think he’s more a middle relief, borderline setup type (think Jon Rauch I guess, granted, Rauch closed for a bit) if he’s in the pen. I’m not sure what his best case scenario is as a starter, but with the movement he could generate, I’d like to see what he could do … provided the kid is mentally ready. That said, I’ll take whatever I can get out of Huseby, after last year.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey you hear anything on carrillo's stuff
i imagine it’s basically what it was last year, maybe a tick more on the fastball due to coming out of the pen, but i haven’t heard anything specific. very fascinated with the kid’s return. he’s been superb, and it’s easy to forget that he’s fairly young (22 I think). Another solid night tonight. I’d really like to see him in the rotation again.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vitters
Was just promoted to Daytona along with Chris Carpenter.
http://muskat.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/06/629_vitters_to_daytona.html
by Outshined_One on Jun 29, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Carpenter to Daytona was announced by Peoria Chiefs Nathan Baliva yesterday, as an FYI.
by Outshined_One on Jun 29, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
excellent.
I'm a Cubs FANATIC. They are my team, through thick and thin. When they play over their heads, and when they play under the gutter. When they win the division, and then get swept in the division series. When they get no-hitters and when they blow no-hitters. And some day, when they go all the way and get those rings. This is the kind of fan I am.
by drewishdrewid on Jun 29, 2009 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so bad...
These descriptions make it sound like our system isn’t THAT bad…Just that most are a couple years away…
by pjs83 on Jun 29, 2009 7:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
that's fair
the reason our system won’t get ranked high is largely because most of our promising assets are far away, and thus, there’s higher risk. Overall, we’re still in the restocking of the system process, although there’s better quality than before, imo. For example, I think our arms depth is getting really close to 2003 levels (and for people that forget, in 03, our system was considered one of the top in terms of pitching depth).
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the research!
Nice writeups – I had missed huseby’s #‘s. That’s very impressive.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jun 29, 2009 8:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They've been careful with him
I hope that they give him a look as a starter down the line, but after the mental issues last year, the 1 inning approach makes a lot of sense.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some thoughts
-I do not like Archer…yet. His ability to miss bats is nice and the fact that he’s left-handed is a bonus…but holy hell does his control suck. Lefties with a history of control problems do not have a good history. Unless he figures out his control problems, he’s going to get eaten alive at higher levels. The fact that he’s repeating Low A doesn’t help, either.
-Huseby and Parker are nice relief prospects and all, but ehhhhh. There are a handful of other guys who have higher ceilings at more premium positions who are more deserving of consideration on this list (Kyler Burke, Brett Jackson, Junior Lake, Ryan Searle, Hak Ju Lee, etc.). Plus, I saw Huseby early in the season and came away unimpressed. He had nice bite on his breaking pitch, but his velocity was high 80s/touching low 90s. He may have improved since then, but until I see something that states otherwise, I’m not going to be thrilled with a relief prospect in Low A.
-My mid-season thoughts were posted here earlier.
by Outshined_One on Jun 29, 2009 9:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
a couple things
I tend to agree with your point about LHP with poor control, but Archer is actually a righty. And while he may be repeating A-ball, his peripheral stats are trending in the right direction, and aside from the very high BB rate, his numbers are impressive. And he’s only 20…
I agree with you on Huseby and Parker, and although we only have a small sample size, I’d suggest Dae-Eun Rhee belongs on the top prospect list. Hopefully he returns from his rehab soon and improves upon his stellar stats from last year. And if we want to talk about relief prospects, I’d throw Alex Maestri and Jeff Stevens. Both need to improve their walk rate, but both have definite potential to make the bullpen at some point in time next year (probably this year for Stevens, even if he has to wait until the roster expands).
by Ryjo on Jun 29, 2009 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gah, I keep getting screwed up on which arm Archer throws with. I think it stems back from the initial trade when some sources announced him as a lefty, but whatever. My bottom line about his control remains. It’s pretty rare to see a guy with very high BB rates suddenly flip the switch and keep the rest of their numbers at the same level. There are exceptions (see: Hill, Rich), but usually those guys don’t start doing better when they move up. I just do not get a good feeling from him.
by Outshined_One on Jun 29, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey OO
took a gander at your list. interesting stuff.
Flaherty bothers me. As you note, the periphs look alright. It’s also a tough league to hit. But for a college bat, I expected better in the MWL, and his K/BB slipped badly in June.
I was supremely excited on Tony Thomas, but the horrendous K/BB collapse just makes me think the early goings were a fluke of sorts.
I think Whitenack may emerge in Boise, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Antigua and Suarez stepped forward. Darvill really intrigues me. I’m also curious how Ha/Jung do, along with Logan Watkins and Matt Cerda.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
-Flaherty’s been an odd case for me this season. His BABIP at last glance was hovering around .260, so the guy clearly has run into bad luck. However, his LD% is below 10%, which is some cause for concern in terms of his ability to hit gappers. However, his GO/FO is relatively close to even, which tells me his HR numbers are legitimate since more HRs come on flyballs than line drives. Still, there’s some cause for concern.
-I have no idea what to make of Thomas. Apparently he’s made strides defensively, but for a guy who was supposed to be a strong contact hitter, I’m left scratching my head reading his lines. It could be that the Cubs are screwing around with him in terms of his swing/pitch selection, but it could also be Thomas slumping.
-Similarly, I’m not sure what to make from what we have down in Boise and the AZ League. At the rate he’s going, Lee’s a lock for my Top 10 and has a chance to make his way into my Top 5. Apparently he’s been stellar defensively and has done very well at the plate. Everyone else is a relative unknown until I get more data. High draftees like Jackson, LeMahieu, Kirk, and Raley could all be factors. Guys like Fitzgerald and Mincone have performed well since signing. The other Koreans (Ha and Jung) are intriguing. Matchulat, Suarez, and Antigua have all flashed potential. Ditto Cerda and Watkins.
We could have some legitimate names coming out of short season ball. However, I can’t claim to have a grip on that until these guys get more playing time.
by Outshined_One on Jun 30, 2009 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raley
I was very excited that we landed him. I sort of expected it (seemed like a Wilken type of pick, a former 2-way guy). I just didn’t expect to land him so late.
I’ll be curious on Whitenack’s velocity and whether or not it really is in the mid-90’s. If so, the comparison to Dan McDaniel in terms of circumstance (I believe Raisin made that comparison) may be solid, as a more polished pitcher with a plus secondary pitch.
Thomas really is E Patt. I had hoped for better (well, Thomas may be better defensively at 2nd than EPat ever was), but his approach at the plate seemingly needs a lot of work. Even his Boise season was marked with a 22.5% K rate, and the subsequent rise probably should’ve been expected. I wonder if they would’ve been better off slow-playing him, but it seemed like a bold, smart move when they jumped him to Daytona.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting list
My top 30 has been a bit fluid this year, but the top 12 would be something like (off the top, haven’t done a new ranking in a few weeks)
1. Josh Vitters, A-/B+. He had a superbly hot streak, followed by a superbly cold run. I’ve had some Cubs fans tell me “bad luck contributed to the poor run of late”, but to say that, you’d have to say good luck helped him during his good run. That said, overall, he’s shown enough to really get some momentum going amongst prospect followers (over at Sickels, there was an interesting discussion during his hot streak on how high he’d rate – easy for Cubs fans to forget he was a borderline top 50 guy this past offseason). I’ll be very curious how he does at Daytona, but he’s exceeded my expectations on this season so far.
2. Jay Jackson, B+/A-. I was overly high on him last year, and I think I’m higher than most on him still. Ryno’s been talking about his four quality pitches – if his change and curve have stepped up that much, watch out. After a slow start, he’s been flat out dominant. I still think he’s potentially a TOR guy, with a worst case scenario of being a top late inning pen arm.
3. Andrew Cashner, B/B+. He’s had an excellent season, and I’ll be the first to say I’m surprised that the extended outings experiment has worked as well as it has. I’ll be curious if the Cubs keep him starting, or perhaps ponder pushing him as a pen arm. I expect the former, but I can’t rule out the latter, particularly if we need pen help and are in the playoff chase.
4. Jeff Samardzija, B. It seems quite unlikely that he’ll reach the innings limit this year. Granted, only 19 innings away, so who knows. He qualifies, for now. At some point, I think, depending on how the other arms develop, the Cubs need to ask themselves if Samardzija’s value as a pen arm, where he could perhaps be a late inning guy, might be greater than his value as a starter. Now, I actually don’t expect them to answer that this year, and he may have a shot at the rotation next year (Harden’s spot), but with Randy Wells strong development, and several strong arms behind him, I think they should. The lack of secondary development, by most accounts, has to be disappointing.
I think the top 4 is fairly set, in my mind. It’ll take a lot for me to see someone crack that top 4. After that, though, it’s a huge mess to work through. My attempt as of now would be
5. Starlin Castro, B-. Have to be superbly pleased with how his season has gone. He jumped to Daytona and has not only held his own, but excelled. He was the FSL ASG MVP, and is headed to the Futures game. Still some more work needed at the plate, and while he has the potential to be an excellent glove, he’s still inconsistent back there. That said, he’s young.
6. Dan McDaniel, B-. He struggled in June, but he was jumped to Daytona. Some struggles should’ve been expected. I’ll be curious how he finishes the year, but I still love his upside. At his best, this is a guy with good velo on his fastball, a sinker that moves, and a couple breaking pitches to confuse batters. That’s my type of guy, a guy that has the potential to get the groundballs when need be, while having enough bite to get the K’s. Add in his frame, and I am just fascinated by it. That said … he’s definitely a work in progress, so this is more an upside nod.
7. Hak-ju Lee, B-/C+. He’s been fine in Boise so far, but this is more an upside nod as well. Loaded with tools, it’ll be interesting following this kid.
8. Tyler Colvin, ?. Taking a wait and see on this one.
9. Brett Jackson, B-/C+. This is a tools nod. I’ve expressed this elsewhere, but I didn’t hate the pick. I didn’t like it either, was okay with it.
10. Jose Ascanio, B-/C+. I think it’s very likely that he won’t be a prospect by season’s end due to pitching enough innings, but his strong season deserves mention and he’s still a prospect.
11. Casey Coleman, C+. I was superbly high on him, but even I didn’t expect this. If his curve improves (or if the slider he’s working on develops), he’ll be that much better. I love his honesty in interviews. In a recent ITI interview, he acknowledged he was a mid-end of the rotation type and that he’s stopped throwing for velocity. I like a kid who knows what he’s able to do and what he’s good at. It was a very good read.
12. Dae-Eun Rhee C+*- This is more an upside nod as well. He flashed extremely exciting potential, and here’s hoping he can work his way back. I’m usually a bit hesitant on injuries, but it’s been that type of year.
Several guys could compete in the back of the top 12, like Brandon Guyer (was pushed, struggled and had some bad luck), Larry Suarez (upside), Chris Carpenter (I really, really like him, but let’s see how his stuff plays in Daytona and how his arm holds up, along with whether his control can improve), Chris Archer (love the upside, but if we’re comparing low A performances, Rhee’s was reportedly that much more intriguing, but I can buy Archer as top 10 in our system), Kyler Burke (taking a wait and see on how the rest of his season goes), Steve Clevenger (wonder if he’s our backup backstop in 2010). I want to include Ryan Flaherty in there, but I’m really not sure how I feel, and a lot of people seem down. I’m still lukewarm on Searle. There’s some guys that I don’t know enough of down in Boise, namely Ha and Jung, but both sound intriguing enough.
Considering how long a lit of names I’m going through, Barney would be in the top 20-25. There’s a whole host of pen arms, such as Blake Parker and Alessandro Maestri.
___________________________
Anyhow, been awhile since I worked on a list, so that was sort of shoot from the hip.
General thoughts on system (in response to above commentator): We’re still at the end of the rankings. The system has had some struggles this year. Actually, off the top, a case could be made that we’re the worst system in the game. That said, I’m still fairly excited by the system. I think I used the phrase once, but I think there’s light at the end of the tunnel in regards to the system.
As I’ve noted before, I’d love a bang-up system, top to bottom filled with talent … and moreover, different types of talent. We don’t have that. Now, this year has been terrible to follow at the big league level, but what we do finally have are some promising assets in the system, quality pitching arms and high upside positional talent. That’s been sorely lacking in recent years. With the setup of our current MLB squad, we’ve got to have the high value assets in the lower levels to work with when our current core is out the door. Value’s the keyword – most of the guys won’t pan out, but if we can create value, that could help us in trades.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice
I agree with a lot of that, although we clearly differ on some grades and names.
The only name missing from that crowd that I’ve seen tossed around is Ryan Searle. I’ve read up on him, but I’m curious about why you’re lukewarm on him, especially considering he turned 20 a few days ago.
by Outshined_One on Jun 30, 2009 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta admit
a lot of it is based upon the bad report last year on his makeup and stuff (I believe it was BA, but I honestly don’t remember right now). That’s stuck in my mind so long that I probably am being unfair with it right now. He’s had a solid season, considering the circumstances. That said, his secondary stuff is still a huge question from what I understand, and he’s really struggled in the last couple of months. Certainly, ARL gives him a boost, but I’m just not comfortable with him that high. Top 20? If I thought about it, perhaps. In all honesty, the Cubs have a huge mess after you get past the first 4 names or so. I mean, most of our system is “C/C+ types” and probably more of the former than the latter.
But at the end of the day, people place so much on prospect lists. They really are more for discussion than anything.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had a back and forth with Raisin awhile ago on Searle. Last season there were reports floating around that he was hitting the high 80s, looked soft, and was causing coaches problems in Mesa. However, reportedly, he turned it around and got his velocity up to where he’s working in the low 90s and in much better shape. My impression was that Searle’s floor was Justin Berg (sinker and nothing else), but Raisin said that his secondary stuff was actually developing to the point where it was better than Berg’s and that Searle could be a decent starter.
Still, after reading this article, it’s easy to see how he can rub people the wrong way. Considering I was once a bull-headed 20 year old, though, I’m willing to cut him some slack.
by Outshined_One on Jun 30, 2009 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like him better than berg
I buy Searle developing into a decent starter. I like him better than Berg, although definitely that is age related, due to the idea that his secondary stuff can get better. Actually, I think he reminds me a bit of Casey Coleman in terms of stuff, and I guess therein lies another factor as to why I am hesitant to push Searle higher. He’s probably got better upside than Coleman, but Coleman’s producing at a higher level, has a very good sinker in his own right, and his change is probably a bit better than any secondary option of Searle’s as of now, and much as I like Coleman, he’s only a borderline top 10 for me.
Anyhow, we’re really talking a matter of degrees here, as the difference from 5 and 20 won’t be by much.
On a side note, Searle certainly isn’t Jay Jackson in terms of off-field perception.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 2:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Searle
His issue with the offspeed stuff is command/control of it. When the curve and/or change is hitting its spots (which is half the time, I’m guessing), he’s dominating the FSL at age 19. His curve is better than Berg’s slider now, and Searle is only 19 while Berg is in his mid-20s (and Searle probably got way less coaching than Berg in his HS days since he’s from Australia).
The cockiness is a big issue, moreso for me if he’s not open to coaching but that article also said he’s really hard on himself and hopefully he’ll listen to coaching to improve his stuff.
by Raisin on Jun 30, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t consider us as bad as the Sox or Astros, who have pretty crappy systems. Having said that, the Cubs haven’t had tremendous success in drafting and developing position players in recent years. Theriot is doing better than I thought he would as an everyday SS (although I’d love it if we could get a stud SS and move him to 2B), but it’s not hard to see why many people projected him to be a utility infielder a couple years back. Hoffpauir is a capable backup, and Fox has a great bat, but just the same, the Cubs’ system isn’t known for developing its own position players.
Having said that, the Cubs have a glut of intriguing quality arms in their system—especially in the lower levels of the system. I’d say the ranking at #27 isn’t horribly off-base. Maybe a little higher, even.
by Ryjo on Jun 30, 2009 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the astros system
has had a small resurgence this past year, with Lyles and Castro probably topping the system. I’d probably place us ahead as well, but I think it’s fairly close. Norris is still a strong asset, more likely in the pen, Lo is a solid looking pen arm that has moved up to AA already. There’s some depth in the C+ type guys.
The other system I was initially thinking of that would be near the bottom, off the top, would be the Tigers. I can’t think of much at the top of their system – Ryan Perry seems like he’s the top guy right now, but another 23 innings, and he’s not a prospect anymore. Brett Jacobson has been alright. I’m too lazy to check how some of their raw assets have performed this year.
With the graduation of Gordon Beckham, the White Sox will probably be near the bottom as well, but they’ve got some quality at the top with the impact bat of Tyler Flowers to go with strong arms in Aaron Poreda and Dan Hudson. I’d have to see how their 2nd tier of guys performed this year. Dayan Viciedo has certainly flopped a bit.
The Nationals would be in the bottom mix as well, but when they add Strasburg, they’ll have that beacon of hope. Actually, as a total side note, a 1-2 punch of Strasburg/Zimmerman looks real solid … if they can fix the rest of the team.
Hmm … thinking more about it a day later, I’d say we’re probably in that 23-28 range. There’s upside, but the pieces are far off, so that should be factored in.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That should be factored in, but
The fact that a lot of our pieces are a ways off is also encouraging, since we have so much money (and NTC) committed for the next couple of years anyway.
Detroit gutted their system to get Miggy (if there’s any hitter worth giving the farm for, which I generally disagree with, he’d be one of the few), and with the call-up of Porcello, they don’t have too much.
The Sox have Poreda up too, and I don’t think he’ll get sent back down, so it’s only a matter of time before he’s not even a prospect anymore. They’re doing better, but I think their farm will need a few years to fully recover from some incredibly poor drafts. I’d have to check, but I don’t think they scout the Pacific Rim the way the Cubs and some other teams do, either.
As for the Nats, if/when they trade Dunn, they should be able to pick up a couple decent pieces. And I agree with you—if Strasburg does sign…
by Ryjo on Jun 30, 2009 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't disagree
as noted above, i think our system fits alright with our mlb team right now. the next step is to develop enough of the talent in the lower levels.
got a tough time seeing the white sox put 45 more innings on poreda. they’ve got a glut of guys in that C+ area, so really, it comes down to how one perceives the top of the two systems when comparing them to each other. Hudson’s a quality arm.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Samardzija - innings limit?
To what are you referring?
by dr stabbingworth on Jun 30, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Does anything change if he’s no longer a rookie?
by dr stabbingworth on Jun 30, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not technically a prospect anymore.
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
MLB innings
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting comment from Coleman
You figure his dad has helped direct him and in a smart way. Joe probably gave him an accurate assessment of his potential and Casey has taken it to heart. Nice to see when so many young players think they can be stars.
by rlpete on Jun 30, 2009 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since I know everyone cares
I go:
1. Vitters
2. Jackson
3. Castro
4. Cashner
5. Samardzija
6. Lee
7. Carpenter
8. Thomas
9. Rhee
10. Searle or McDaniel
Ascanio (service time) and Wells (innings) no longer can qualify for prospect lists that use the rookie eligiblity guidelines.
by Raisin on Jun 30, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great topic and some thoughts
Its great to revisit what we have and what we need. If we have to put stock in BA then we’re in alot of trouble, they’ve been off for about three yrs at least, since Josh Boyd and others have left and went to different MLB clubs. I think its pretty good for a 1st full season like Coleman to be pitching as well as he had. I’ve seen him at times and he’s been anywhere from 87 to 93 sitting mostly 89 to 91 with a couple of decent breaking balls and a good change. For a 15th rounder to have 8 wins under his belt is impressive. Huseby is quite the story, because after reading stories about him last year in the Arizona League and pitching between 80 and 83 not being used much and hearing stories from AZ Phil that it was a struggle for him to throw strikes to what we have now and have seen stories that now he’s 90 to 93 with an ungodly strikeout/walk ratio is quite the turnaround. Thanks for all the stories, its good to stay in touch.
by Slamdog on Jun 30, 2009 7:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hey slam
long time man. Have you seen Coleman’s curve of late? I’m curious how it’s looked – seems like mixed reports, and the kid was honest in his ITI interview, saying it was okay. He won’t ever be a TOR type, but if he can get a breaking pitch to freeze batters more, he’ll sneak up on people. He’s gone fairly under the radar, partly, I think, due to being pushed with Jay Jackson at the same time and Jackson just dominating.
Oh, and if you’ve seen Jackson of late, was wondering where his FB was sitting as the summer months heat up.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
toons
long time yesiree. Havent seen Coleman this year but his cb last year was pretty tight with rotation and was in the 74/78 range and have read where some people say thats he’s made his cb better. Even if he’s a 4th/5th starter thats pretty good for a 15th rounder who’s still 21 yrs old in the Southern League his 1st full year. You have the Bell’s and the Boone with 3 generation big leaugers and you might have three Coleman’s if he can keep improving and it would be the 1st time a 3 generation family would all make it as pitchers.
by Slamdog on Jun 30, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prospects
Went to a Chiefs game about a week ago and have some thoughts on a couple of players who you guys have mentioned.
Carpenter struggled early with his control but then settled down as the game went on. He was registering in the low 90’s on the O’Brien field gun for most of the first 4 innings showing a decent curveball. In this final 2 innings he got it up to 94 before striking the final batter he faced with one clocked at 96. Vitters went 0-4 as the DH so it was kind of lost cause to try to see what he could do in the field. He K’ed, F9, and went 5-3 twice. He didn’t show a lot of patience which I hope he can work on at Daytona. Huseby was ok as he made interesting putting the go-ahead run at the plate. He touched 90 but never got above that. He did show a decent slider with some nice tilt that was in the upper 70’s. Going to a Smokies game in a couple of weeks so I’ll have my take own some other guys I have not seen yet.
by BloNoCubFan19 on Jun 30, 2009 8:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vitters
has never been long on patience at the plate. And therein lies the biggest concern with him as he progresses.
"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray
by Archie on Jun 30, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE
The thing with Vitters isn’t that he’s like previous power hackers we’ve had in the system (Harvey, Dopirak, etc.). Vitters’ greatest asset is his strike zone discipline. He hasn’t walked very much or struck out very much because he jumps on pitches in the zone. It’s pretty rare to see him over-extend himself or unnecessarily expand his zone when he’s at the plate. He’s got a very strong handle on the strike zone, which is nice to see.
To me, the weakness in his game at the plate is that he gets himself out on pitchers’ pitches in the zone. That’s not necessarily a bad thing for someone his age.
by Outshined_One on Jun 30, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really have high hopes on Carpenter
but there’s a part of me that thinks he may be … well … Angel Guzman-ish and better off in the pen where he can just gun the fb/curve combination. Here’s hoping he settles down a bit. Daytona will be a good test.
A lot of arms last year moving fast.
I’m not sure Huseby will ever be a kid that guns it more than the low 90’s, and therein lies why I hope he can get a look as a starter again, if they feel he’s mentally ready. At his best, a couple seasons back, he was getting good downhill movement to pair with his breaking pitches, making him a tough guy to deal with.
by toonsterwu on Jun 30, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
radar guns
Most of the radar guns at minor league parks arent very accurate. The ones that are accurate for the most part are the ones the scouts have because they tune them everyday.
by Slamdog on Jun 30, 2009 8:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
radar guns
I know they aren’t very accurate, but I just wanted to post them to give an idea of how he threw. I hope Carpenter and Vitters can have the the same type of success at Daytona as they had at Peoria. Looks like Cashner is on his way to Tennessee so I might be able to see him. Wouldn’t mind seeing Jackson or Coleman either with the way each of them are throwing.
by BloNoCubFan19 on Jun 30, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















