What's wrong with Harden?
Why is Rich Harden's ERA over 5 this season? Come along and find out...
The short version? Hill is giving up more HR's. He isn't giving up more fly balls, so the issue is that he's giving up more HR's on his fly balls. My best guess is this is probably caused by a higher degree of consistency in his fastball velocity compared to last year. Bob Brenly may be right!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
5 recs |
157 comments
Comments
his Hr to flyball ratio has been high all year.
way above career norms. Now I don’t think this is the ONLY problem but it is definitely a big one. I guess at least he is healthy? Keep in mind to hes a free agent to be so maybe, hopefully he picks it up the second half big time to increase his own value.
by Glacier on Jul 11, 2009 4:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Take a look at the post...
his HR/FB ratio is absolutely the dominant reason for his struggles. He’s had some bad luck and his BB rate is a little worse. But the HR/FB numbers are the biggest problem by a long shot – something like an order of magnitude.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arm health
Harden has forever been plagued with shoulder problems. He is brilliant when healthy, but sustainability of health is a problem. The strategy with him is to somehow get 20 good starts a year.
$136 million payroll for a .500 style ballclub. Good work Jim.
by BLou on Jul 11, 2009 4:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't appear fatigue is an issue, though.
None of the tell-tale signs show up. His velocity is high enough and he is fine pitching deep into games if he’s not getting roughed up. I think something else is going on here.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it had to do with
the fact that he used to have a real change of speed between the fastball and the change-up, but that difference isn’t as much anymore. He’s still throwing as fast as he used to, but he doesn’t have the ability to make the change-up go SLOW enough to get the batter ahead of the pitch.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 11, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's it.
Look at Harden’s changeup velocities:

Then look at his fastball velocities:

Both are pretty even. The difference is his the spread in his fastball velocities. They are more consistent this year.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, that shoots that theory
down.
Cool chart, tho.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 11, 2009 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The chart is from where?
Just curious.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Jul 11, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's from fangraphs
easily one of the most useful sites on the internets
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett
by berselius on Jul 12, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
but the chart is skewed…he falls in the range of most pitchers which looks like he is throwing pretty slow…seriously who throws from 100-110 and why does it get a 1/3rd of the graph room?
I saw you in that coffee shop, breaking the fifth commandment. Congress passes these things for a reason, Lois.
by hansman1982 on Jul 19, 2009 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it appears
he is very healthy this year. Any other ideas?
by CalCalender on Jul 11, 2009 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not his health.
To me, he’s either tipping his pitches, hanging changeups, missing locations with his fastball, or is being too consistent with his fastball…. or it’s some combination of the above. But i don’t think it’s an injury that’s hampering him.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he is injured
Why? Because his arm angle is much lower than last year. He is not getting on top of the ball losing the downward plane. The loss of the downward plane hurts his change as well as his fastball. And I also believe he has lost 2-3 MPH on his fastball. I haven’t seen a game where he was consistently over 95 where last year that was a typical outing. Just my thoughts.
by socalbob on Jul 11, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did
you take a look at those graphs? He has not lost velocity on his fastball. That graph proves it as it is exactly what his velocity was at last year.
Also, I’ve seen pitch fx data and his arm slot hasn’t lowered either.
This is where stats are our friend because they can disprove our basic assumptions.
by CalCalender on Jul 11, 2009 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Data are your friend.
You should look at them. None of the data are consistent with either of your contentions, as CalCalendar points out.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
have you taken a look at video?
his arm slot is lower than last year. I don’t need graphs or data to tell me what my eyes see.
His velocity is not 95 MPH+ as it was when he first came over.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
good lord, your eyes are wrong. This data is voluminous, approved by MLB and correct.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, you do.
Your eyes lie. You see what you want to see, not what’s there.
Your posts are nothing but an abject rejection of reality. You might as well be arguing with me that the Earth is 6,000 years old or that climate change doesn’t exist. I don’t argue with those folks and i’m done arguing with you, too.
Have fun in fantasy land.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
whatever Shawn
nice way to discuss a subject.
You still have yet to provide me the data or video analysis to say I am wrong, yet want to pack your bags and go home. Why do my eyes lie in watching his mechanics? Oh that’s right, we can no longer discuss this.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO
Eyes are good for the 2nd pass. Use data analysis to identify questions that can be better answered, sometimes, with eyes on the guy analysis. For example, PITCHf/x may have shown (in theory) something wrong with Sanchez. Only a guy like Rags could see what was wrong and fix it. If my eyes tell me something, i run to the data to see if my eyes are lying.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's all I am trying to do
he is not throwing with the same velocity both top-end and consistent top-end (20 consecutive starts of 95+). True?
The data shows there is a potential problem. I have submitted that I think his arm slot is lower in 2008 versus 2009. I’m relaying what my eyes are telling me.
I am not discouting any of the numbers or analysis.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
... I've put lots of data into this subject.
You haven’t provided any. None at all. All you have given us is your contention that “your eyes” tell you that his arm slot has dropped. Why don’t you post some video or screen caps?
Also, CalCalendar says that the pitch F/X data show the arm slot hasn’t changed.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am using the excellent
data you have provided and judging form the data what some of the problems could be from a physical and mechanical standpoint.
I’m using my eyes in conjunction with the data.
Harry even admitted that both are necessary.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
regardless
if I haven’t mentioned, I think there is something, not sure what, with Harden. Thanks for digging in.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
But his arm slot has looked the same to me. I’ll look again. So far, I’m finding the good Harden/bad Harden is based on a couple factors – location and velocity spread b’twn the four-seam heater and the circle-change. He’s missing low with the fastball when he’s crushed, for example. I’ll have more later this week at Cubs f/x
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem could be...
…they gave Harden Prior’s old locker – good for one year and all down hill from there!
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Jul 13, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm looking forward to that post.
And if you find the arm slot has changed, I’ll admit I was wrong.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would also say his fastball
has absolutely no movement on it – straight as an arrow, exactly what you don’t pitch to a guy like Pujols. If he doesn’t hit the corners and expand the strikezone, he is gonna get clobbered.
by JFCubFan on Jul 12, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought so, too.
But his fastball hasn’t been straight. It’s had more break on it this year than in year’s past. Also, it’s got more break to it than the average fastball. This is true even if you isolate the pitches he’s give up the HR’s on.
A lack of movement on the fastball isn’t the problem.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 2:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think...
… that the alarming thing is that he’s given up homers on all fastballs (13/16). Is he injured? I don’t think so.
He’s missed a lot up in the zone. Obviously, you cannot pitch up there unless you have 94+ stuff… and he’s been around 88-91 all year.
Nice recap, it makes a lot of sense. Again, there is no right answer, just a few ideas.
by serbianking33 on Jul 11, 2009 7:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a very good point.
Of the HR’s hit on fastballs, most were in the low 90’s. But his velocity isn’t down this year, and at least a few of the HR’s were hit off pitches down in the zone.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 11, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As noted above
Missing up with the change has been a problem. The fastball is most effective up in the zone.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you...
look at the HR/FB rate for different locations for each pitch for both 2008 and 2009? That would go a long way towards answering the question, in my mind. I can do this too if I can get my hands on the data.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harry
fact that 9 of those HR’s were high fastballs? Wouldn’t that contradict the low fastball is the problem theory?
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking that
but didn’t ask it until I went back and reviewed the article. Maybe it’s a question of what’s considered “high” and what’s considered “low”— thigh-high = middle of the zone or is it waist-high = middle?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well we can list them off
this is my def of “high” or “low”
1. high change
2. high fastball
3. high change
4. high fastball
5. high fastball
6. low fastball
7. low fastball
8.high change
9. high fastball
10. low fastball
11. high fastball
12. high fastball
13. low fastball
14. middle fastball
15 high fastball
16. high fastball
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so by
my count thats 8 high fastballs that have been hit out. Also worth noting that the last 8 HR’s he has given up has been off the heater.
I just get a feeling batters are guess hitting vs this guy and that combined with the fact that Harden leaving balls up and out over the plate is hurting him
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
lack of top-end velocity, small dispersion between fastball and change-up, and, as you said, leaving balls up and out over the plate.
Guys are guessing—“fastball” and pretty much getting it. Not having it at 97 creating a late swing foulball versus 93 and getting torched to the seats is a large gap. And if his change is coming in at 86-88, then a hard drive up the middle becomes a pulled hit allowing the batter to get the head out a little further.
There is really no deception to his pitches right now.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm
not buying that argument just yet. Maybe he isn’t spiking above 95 as often as last year but his range is damn near the exact same. His average velocity per start isnt that far off as you can tell.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
do you not buy the graph
posted where he had 21 of 24 starts with 95+ MPH in 2008 and only 7 of 13 in 2009? I’m just using the data posted in this thread.
His fastball is not as explosive as it was in 2008.
The MPH on his HR’s are: 86 CH, 93 FB, 82 CH, 89 FB, 92 FB, 93 FB, 91 FB, 85 CH, 91 FB, 92 FB, 90 FB, 92 FB, 92 FB, 91 FB, 93 FB, and 92 FB.
Hitters are not cranking up on 95+ fastballs, but average 91-93 MPH stuff. Those HR’s on 91-93 MPH fastballs are foul balls to the 1st base side if he was pumping them at 97. Agree? Or am I reading the data wrong?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think
you are forgetting that Harden never averaged above 95 last year. He could dial it up there but I remember plenty of K’s of 88 mph fastballs last year as well. Overall his average FB velocity is the same as last year. Until the largest amount of data trends lower than last years largest amount of data I’m not going to worry about peaks that much.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get that
I know he didn’t average above 95, but he can’t dial it up this year. His 88 MPH K’s were because of the range of 88-98 on fastballs. I thinki his speed is too similar—not enough of a large gap.
I understand your position. I just think not having his 97-98 MPH heater 5 to 10 times a game hurts his overall fastball.
Good diologue, thanks! I wish we were sitting down over a beer talking about it.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
according to Brooks Baseball
another great pitch f/x site, Harden fastest pitch was 96.4 on 5/6/09 against Houston. And scrolling down further, he hit 96 around the 57 and 97 pitch mark. I don’t think not being able to ‘dial it up’ is the problem either.
by philadelphiacub on Jul 13, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
bob is right in the fact that Harden was throwing harder right when we first got him.
If I had more time in life I would take a look at his pitch movement on his faster pitches vs when he is in the low nineties as well as how it affects hitter contact.
Honestly though EVERY major league front office should have a pitch fx guy right now because the data is invaluable.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how do you interpret
the data that says he had 20 consecutive starts hitting 95+ MPH and 21/24 last year.
And now hits 95+ in 7 of 13 starts.
What’s your take?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there may
not be a clear cut answer yet bob, but i dont think that is a smoking gun either. We can tell by the range graph that he can dial it up. Why the frequency is off a bit isn’t easy to say yet.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, the only take i have
and I’m not sure that its really a take, si that his avg. FB velocity last year to this year is almost identical. And anecdotally, he has dialed it up this year, and given that, i’m not sure citing the frequency which he dials it up shows that he’s lost anything regarding velocity. maybe the FB velo range is a factor, but as the article posted showed, the low velo range games weren’t neccessarily multiple HR games
by philadelphiacub on Jul 13, 2009 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very good question
But different metrics will give different answers, and what’s “high” in my jargon may not match yours. I’ll make sure to dig into this particualr issue, though.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt he's injured
He’d be the first one to go on the DL if there was an injury concern.
I would have never guessed Harden would be the 5th starter based on his pitching….I always figured him the 5th starter based on his availability.
by ak123 on Jul 11, 2009 8:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way, my "best guess" was also wrong.
The games where he’s had the most consistency to his fastball velocity have been some of his best.
It’s a difficult problem to figure out. Likely, its a combination of the various things thought to be the problem, including some bad luck.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 2:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Breaking pitches
Has he thrown many curves or sliders this year? Are those pitches being thrown as often as last year? He needs to throw something besides fast balls and straight changes.
by FrankSereno on Jul 12, 2009 6:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He hasn't really thrown much other than FB, CH since coming to Chicago.
… and “guessing fastball” may be part of his problem. Sometimes his change will get mis-characterized as a slider, as it was throughout the outing against Pittsburgh. Look at Harry’s site for more on this but I’m fairly certain he’s been a 2-pitch pitcher for a while now.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's thrown one slider this year
First I’ve seen since 2007. He’s just fastball and circle-change, but I’m not ruling out a few splitters, but I seriously doubt it.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The PIT game was full of them...
but I assumed that was a mis-characterization issue, as the data on those pitches screamed “changeup” to me. Was that an error in the gameday classification?
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Gameday has a lot of trouble with Harden, is stuff is so unusual. His change-up cuts. If he throws the split, it doesn’t spin (or so I’m told). He can also turn the change over and take the cut off. I mean, he claims to have three variations on the circle change. I’ll show y’all the sliders in detail when I write it all up.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've
heard from other fx guys that Harden’s stuff is messy at times to categorize
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Command and Control ...
…. are the major problems for Harden this year, not velocity or movement. He is constantly pitching from behind because he cannot throw strikes consistently. He is also missing his spots badly — so even when he throws strikes they are way too frequently in a terrible location over the middle of the plate. That’s what makes for tons of HRs … give good ML hitters mistakes over the plate and bad things happen, even if the batter isn’t named Pujols.
If It Takes Forever ....
by wrigley1 on Jul 12, 2009 7:06 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Now this is something that the data support.
Harden is only throwing first pitches for strikes 50% of the time, compared to 56% of the time last season. So he is definitely falling behind in the count more often, and that could certainly lead to his HR issues.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
and command is one of the first things to go when injured or a change in mechanics has taken effect (lower arm slot).
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
his arm slot
isn’t lower. Saying otherwise is nonsense
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
do you have side-by-side video proof?
I doubt it.
I’m talking about a few inches, not Jim Palmer versus Dan Quissenberry.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitch FX
can spot a few inches of difference. I would familiarize yourself with it before you assume doesnt work.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cal
Pitch FX does not show the arm slot of a pitcher. It is accurate as to movement and location to an inch, I will give that and acknowledge it. I do not assume it doesn’t work.
I went back and re-read the article and it doesn’t show arm angles in 2008 versus 2009. It talks about the velocity of and movement on pitches. Also added were the charts for LD, FB, GB percentages and Harden’s non-intentional walk rate.
NONE of the data shows Harden’s release point in ‘09 versus ’08. Do you understand what I mean by release point? You seem to argue that the number of inches his pitches move is indication in no change. If you do understand release point and can show me that data where his release point is the same in ’09 as it was in ’08, please provide it. I’d love to familiarize myself with it. My eyes may be wrong, in that regard.
There may be some pitch characterization issues there where changeups are mistakenly labeled as fastballs or vice versa—written by Shawn himself shows potential gaps in the data. It’s difficult to data mine if there are errors in the sample, no?
As for velocity, Harden hit 95+ in 21 of 24 starts in ’08. This year he has topped 95+ in 7 of 13 starts. How can anyone say his velocity is not affected? Is it a mechanical flaw? Injury? Pitch selection change? Who knows. I offered my thoughts based on expericences pitching, going through injury which required a major recontruction, and what my eyes see in his mechanics.
I do not see why my position is so unreasonable to you.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for velocity, Harden hit 95+ in 21 of 24 starts in ’08. This year he has topped 95+ in 7 of 13 starts. How can anyone say his velocity is not affected?
I’m not entirely sure that you can make that correlation with half the season to go.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
arguing for arguements sake, I guess?
If you do not believe a drop from 21/24 to 7/13 is not significant, I’m suprised.
Also of note Harden had 20 consecutive starts last year of 95+ MPH. And as he tired late in the year, he had only 1 of his last 4 starts over 95+ MPH. Yep, 3 of his last 4 starts of the year he could not hit 95+ MPH. A case could be made to say Harden has failed to hit 95+ MPH in 9 of his last 17 starts—more than 50% of the time after 20 consecutive starts of 95+ MPH.
It has been discussed ad nauseum on this board about keeping Harden fresh for the end of the year as it’s commoin knowledge he tired at the end of 2008. So, I don’t believe we need his second-half of 2009 data to show a downward trend of his top-end fastball velocity.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
all I'm saying
is that if he picks it up in the second half, he could end up with 21/26, and that would not be far off of last year. Since he hasn’t even had 20 starts yet, comparing this year to last year’s starts… again. You can’t make the correlation with half the season to go.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
glass half-full
If Harden is not injured, then I can subscribe to your position.
It’s like a running back averaging 4.5 yards per carry one year, getting beaten up and averaging 3.7 yards per carry the first half of the next season and expecting him to come back to the 4.5 level for the last half of the year.
I hope we get the Harden of the 217 ERA+ (I think) of last year.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm.
If he goes from 7/13 to 21/26, that would mean he’d have hit 95+ in 14 out of his last 13 starts. Kind of impossible, if you ask me.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 13, 2009 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
probably
but I was just making numbers up.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al
the overall range of Harden’s fastball is show in the graph above. Do you see a noticeable difference between 08 and this year?
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't appear so to me.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 14, 2009 6:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BECAUSE
PITCH FX SHOWS RELEASE POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go read Harry Pavildis blog Cubs Pitch FX. He posts here all the time. Pitch FX shows release points. I can’t make this more clear. Or you know what here is an example from last year.
Z’s no hitter http://www.cubsfx.com/2008/09/carlos-zambrano-im-back-no-hitter.html
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's staring you in the face and you fail to recognize it
first of all, there is nothing you have provided that shows Harden’s release point in 2008 versus 2009 to make a comparison.
Secondly, the link you provided PROVES my point as it shows the varying release points and different heights Zambrano released his pitches. Zambrano’s 4-seamer is released HIGHER than his 2-seamer. Agree? It’s visual evidence you provided.
I am asking if you have data that shows Harden is releasing his 4-seam and 2-seam at the same height or if his arm slot has dropped in 2008 versus 2009.
I can’t make this more clear to you. Where is the data that shows Harden is throwing in the same exact arm slot or motion as in 2008? Perhaps Harden is throwing more 2-seam fastballs versus 4-seam fastballs. Why? I don’t know, but offer he may be hurt which diminishes his ability to throw in the high 90’s. Or maybe he has just naturally dropped his arm slot a couple of inches prohibiting him from maxing out his velocity.
I am offering 2 reasons, one mechanical and one physical, and asking questions without getting the data you tell me is concrete eveidence that I am wrong and you are right. It’s my opinion that he has a mechanical flaw that may be caused by injury or is just a mechanical flaw. If you can show me what I have asked for, then I can change my opinion as new data would tell me.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
*THIS* is why I don't want to argue with you:
Secondly, the link you provided PROVES my point as it shows the varying release points and different heights Zambrano released his pitches. Zambrano’s 4-seamer is released HIGHER than his 2-seamer. Agree? It’s visual evidence you provided.
So the pitch F/X data shows release points when it agrees with your assessment, but doesn’t show release points otherwise?
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes Shawn
in 1 Start
I am saying compare 2008 to 2009? What is so hard about that?
Has his arm slot dropped from last year?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it has...
I’ll admit that I haven’t seen the data. But then you have to admit you haven’t posted any evidence, either. I’m trusting CalCalendar on this one that the data show no change in arm slot and am willing to go get the data when I have time.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I posted
that if it has not changed, then I’ll accept it.
I don’t think Cal understood I was asking to see his ’09 slot versus his ’08 slot. My eyes tell me it is lower. If the data says my eyes are wrong, than I can accept it.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, come this weekend I'll try to take a look.
No promises, though. It’s a busy couple of weeks for me at work.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gameday release points are not
THey’re five feet out in flight, I back the data up and trajectory noise gets crunched out into a better estimate of release point.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes it does
You can derive arm slot from the data. Matt Lentzner and I both feel very strongly about this, and it has been a topic of discussion at the last two PITCHf/x Summits. You really should do some research before making broad statements about the technology (no offense intended)
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
none taken
I am asking for a comparison between ’08 and ’09. I do not believe the data shows the comparison. Is that correct?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what you mean
I can derive an estimate of arm angle from any chunk of data, a game, an inning, a season. We can even swag it with just a single four-seam fastball. Data never shows anything, analysis of the data reveals answers to questions. Or, usually, more freakin’ questions :-)
This is a great conversation, I’ll make sure I fanshot a link when I post my analysis at Cubs f/x
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
let me try to explain
for arguments sake, let assume Harden threw his 4-seam fastball at a 90 degree arm angle all year in 2008. I believe his arm slot is lower in 2009—where his 4-seam fastball would be about 80 to 85 degrees.
It’s a small difference, but could explain velocity loss and command issues.
Do you have data that shows arm angle from 2008 versus 2009? I would think it would take video analysis to see this.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The pitch F/X data includes...
the position of the ball throughout it’s flight. From that, you can back out where the pitch started from. In other words, it’s release point.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
compare '08 to '09?
do you have that? I am hoping Harry has it, if you don’t.
I think it’s small. It’s not a Jim Palmer versus Dan Quissenberry difference.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can do it...
but I’d have to get the spider working to download all the data again. And yes, I could compare ’08 to ’09. The data are out there.
And yes… i understand it’s a small difference. But the pitch F/X program should be able to pull it up.
Sorry if I was a little harsh earlier. I just get upset when people reject data out of hand, which is what it seemed like you were doing.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if I came across
as rejecting data, then I say “sorry” as I was trying to say “here is a possible reason” the data is what it is.
I love the data and think it’s great. I was not rejecting what you were posting, but rather expanding on the subject.
Truth probably lies somewhere in between it all.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh
dont worry sometimes us “sabermagicians” can come across as pretty bitchy and you handled it well for the most part
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
variety is the spice of life
it’s all good
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They key for Harden...
…is for him to have the exact same arm slot for both his fastball and his change. If for some reason they aren’t, it allows hitters to recognize when one or the other is coming.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Jul 13, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
harden
should we bring this guy back??? and this is scary. i think lilys contract is up.
by NOMAR on Jul 12, 2009 7:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lilly has one more year left on his deal.
And Harden won’t be back.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 12, 2009 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if you
could get the guy on a discount he should be back though. The Cubs staff seem to have found a good plan to keep his arm attached and I think this post has done a good job showing that its not a problem of velocity, or lack of movement but rather an enormous amount of pitches left up in the zone. Harden has never done that before in his career so there isnt a great reason to assume it will continue.
by CalCalender on Jul 12, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's due to the fact
That he can’t control whether his changeup dives into the dirt or floats into the hitting zone.
by zam on Jul 12, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm telling you
His fastball is not moving at all anymore. It’s become like a Farnsworth fastball, not sure why. His fastball used to have downward movement that induced a lot of balls on the ground. The fastball velocity is fine, but it is not moving at all.
by BeltwayCubsFan on Jul 12, 2009 10:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
but
we know for a fact that isn’t true. We can track pitch movement now for every single pitcher and his fastball moves. It moves more than the average mlb fastball.
by CalCalender on Jul 12, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cai, admittedly my observations involve no computerized tracking
but simply by watching him pitch. And his fastball may move more than the ‘average’ pitcher, but compared to last year’s Harden, I see far less movement.
by BeltwayCubsFan on Jul 12, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I
understand. But to me this is the new frontier of statistical analysis and its all because of pitch fx (Which is what Harry Pavildis excels at)
The average fan can now find pitch movement, speeds, location and compare it to other years, other players home vs away ect ect. Heck even a few years back the guys at USS Mariner were able to find a problem with King Felix and emailed the pitching coach. The team went on to show the data to Hernandez and it helped him out. This is a vast resource and teams that make an effort to use/master this info are going to have a good weapon.
That said, I read that shawn checked the fastballs that were hit for HR’s to make sure that those fastballs weren’t “flat” and they had the same break as his other fastballs (above average) also keep in mind we compared his fastball movement to last years and its not different either.
by CalCalender on Jul 12, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
... and I'm telling you.
You’re wrong. It was a fine hypothesis, but it’s been disproven. Why keep promoting it when the data show it to be false? Harden has given up 13 home runs on fastball this season and 7 of them have had a higher break than his average fastball from the last 3 seasons.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another thing
to look at is that of the 16 HR’s allowed 5 have come ahead in the count, 6 have come behind the count and 5 have been in an even count. So he isn’t always behind and having to throw a pitch down the middle.
So we have eliminated or shown evidence against
1. Velocity decrease
2. Flat pitches
3. Always being behind and having to make a pitch
What seems consistent
1. 13 of the 16 homers are on fastballs
2. By my count 11 of the homers are in the up & away part of the strike zone. When Harden is getting rocked he is in the zone but not in the part you want to be at.
I would say that his problem is
1. The guy has two pitches. He always has wicked stuff. After seeing him last year the NL could have deduced that on a normal day they will be over matched and hitters are now sitting on 1 of his two pitches (usually the fastball) and just waiting for a heater in the zone they can rip at. Its harder to play guess hitting vs a pitcher like Javier Vazquez who can throw multiple pitches at you but with Harden I could see it working. This could also help explain how the majority of HR’s allowed are off the fastball.
2. Harden is making a ton of mistakes. Any pitcher who leaves balls in the zone he is leaving is going to have trouble. He needs to keep his fastball down, mix in his change up a little bit more to keep hitters off his fastball and mix up his fastball velocity like he did last year.
3. We are still talking about a sample size of 74 innings here. If only a few of these HR’s balls died in the Chicago wind or were hit at Petco Harden’s ERA and FIP would take a nosedive because he doesn’t really give up runs any other way.
by CalCalender on Jul 12, 2009 10:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you've got it, CC.
And if you look at the comments section on the link I posted, you’ll see some more evidence that Harden’s ran into back luck, as you suggest in 3. A larger % of his allowed HR’s have3 been due to luck than the average pitcher. That should improve.
I also think you’re probably right about his pitches being too high in the zone, but don’t have the bulk data on hand to do that analysis.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 12, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think Harden has Bob Howry Disease?
Howry had good velocity but no movement on his fastball last year, and the results were similar to what’s happened to Harden this year.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 13, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no
because as we noted above we know movement isn’t his problem. Because all MLB parks have installed the nessacary equipment we can use pitch fx to see just how much break every pitch anyone throws has. We can also compare those numbers to last year.
Harden’s fastball is not flat, even on the pitches that get rocked.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, then...
… if there doesn’t seem to be a problem with mechanics or velocity, why is he so bad this year?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 13, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my best guesses
are right above ya.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say...
…it’s because his location of his strikes this year are not as good, and he is also getting behind hitters much more.
I don’t care how good your stuff is, consistantly getting behind major league hitters is a recipe for giving up a lot of runs.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Jul 13, 2009 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those
are both very good guesses. Like I noted above if you follow the original link you can see that the location on 11 of the HR’s is very poor. You hit the nail on the head when you said that no matter who you are pitching in poor location is going to hurt you.
What was interesting is that at least on the HR balls Harden was ahead just as often as he was behind so he isnt just grooving pitches in there to even the count, he seems to just be making a abnormally high amount of mistakes up in the zone. That can be corrected if Harden or Larry is noticing this.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess what I'm asking is...
… WHY a pitcher with Harden’s track record is suddenly having so much trouble with location.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 13, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who knows?
It could be a mechanical thing he needs to workout, it could be a mental funk, or it could be a physical issue that is holding him back.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Jul 13, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
it seems like its been forever since we saw the good Rich but its still a small sample size. This could correct itself. Right now there isn’t an obvious anwser. He seems healthy, his velocity and movement are the same as last year when people couldnt buy a hit off him.
All we know for sure is different is that Rich isn’t changing fastballs speeds as much as he was last year and perhaps his pitch selection needs to be altered.
Personally, I think it could be what I said above Harden only has two pitches. Hitters might be sitting on one of the two (most likely the fastball) and waiting for it. So far Rich is obliging by throwing that fastball in a bad spot.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure if there is a reason.
I did all this to find a cause. And believe me, I did a lot of work on it. Maybe I’m not sharp enough to track it down, but to me it doesn’t look like there’s one reason. Instead, bad luck and small sample size seem to be the main culprits, along with pitching more up in the zone. But I’d like to look at location charts for this year vs. last year before I solidify my opinion on that.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I contend
he’s hurt (not saying he needs surgery or his arm is hanging by a thread). Despite what the numbers/programs say, he has a lower arm slot than last year. Maybe 3-4 inches lower. His shoulder flexibility may be limited from all the off-season work as well. He could have a tighter shoulder capsule than before. It’s kind of like watching side-by-side video—you will see very small changes, but they have large impacts on the player.
You can be hurt and still throw the same MPH for a time, but command will suffer. And ultimately the arm will break down. His command is not near what it was in 2008.
I’ve followed him closely from his 2001 and 2002 minor league seasons and watched Rick Peterson put him through the computer analysis models with Dr. Andrews (I believe) in the off-season.
I feel I can speak because it is execatly what happened to me when I pitched leading to a major recontruction in 1990.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I found the problem!
I feel I can speak because it is execatly what happened to me when I pitched leading to a major recontruction in 1990.
Clearly, you’re projecting your past onto Harden’s present. Blowing your arm out doesn’t make you an expert. In your case, it only biases your assessment of reality.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not true Shawn
I became quite a student of pitching mechanics to help determine what caused me to break down. And I still work with children today. I don’t see how using my experiences coaching and playing bias my assessment. I could say your data mining excursions bias your assessment of reality as well as you miss the practical knowledge or skills. But I respect your approach and offer possible explanations.
I know from the physical side of pitching every 5th day in the minor leagues as to being able to maintain velocity despite an injury. And how an injury leads to lack of command—days you free-wheel it and other days you hold on more. And how some days you have it and other days you don’t.
The premise of your article is essentially a lack of command by giving up more HR/FB. To me, my experience says, he’s hurt, injured, tight shoulder, sore elbow, etc. Or it screams his mechanics are off (lower arm slot).
In watching Harden, his arm slot looks lower to me. Maybe 3-4 inches lower which would relieve pressure on his shoulder (if injured). Maybe I am right and maybe I am wrong. I don’t have the video equipment at my disposal to view him in a side-by-side session.
You wrote a fine detailed data analysis, but I don’t see where you presented anything that says, “you are wrong and I am right.” We both could be right or wrong.
You end your post with “Brenly may be right!”—meaning the consistent numbers in his fastball are leading to batters timing him better. However, as I posted to Cal, this is not telling the entire story. 21 of 24 starts in ‘08, Harden hit 95+ and in ’09 has only topped 95+ in 7 of 13 starts. This lack of top-end velocity has made his range much smaller, or consistent, in your terms. Had he been pumping fastballs in the upper 90’s in 88% of his starts in ’09, the data would tell you that his range on his fastball was not consistent (versus the smaller fluctuation of the actual data). But the question remains, why does Harden not have the pure gasoline fastball he had in ’08? Can you explain why Harden has not thrown 95+ in 87.5% of his starts in ’09 which is down 33.7% from prior year?
I offered 2 rationale explanations, care to offer yours?
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
listen...
I’ll give you this much: the pitch F/X data that would show arm slot/release point have not been shown here. I trust CalCalendar when they say they’ve seen those data. So the data haven’t been shown here. My issue is that you seem to deny that this is even possible, that you reject the best data set for this out of hand. If you’d accept those data, I’d be happy to go and get them for you. It would have to wait until the weekend, however, when I’d actually have time to do it. (And my guess is Harry would beat me to it.)
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely not.
His fastball is moving more than last year’s. Even on the HR’s he’s hit the fastball seems to be moving fine. Not all of them, but on average even those specific ones he gave up HR’s on have “Harden-like” break to them.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wrong
Harden fails when the fastball is down. He excels when it is up in the zone.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well trading with Billy Beane isn't an exact science.
But odds are Billy will win the deal.
Randy Wells. A product of the Roy Halladay School of Pitching, located in Toronto, Canada. Possible relocation.
by Cub Style on Jul 13, 2009 11:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this is stupid
Harden was beyond outstanding last year and was the perfect counter to the CC Sabathia deal.
Beane just ditched his centerpiece for Scott Hariston
That trade is a push or a win for the Cubs
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was a logical trade for both clubs...
…Beane evaluated what Harden was going to cost down the road (and his injury risk) and he decided to deal him while he still had value. The Cubs were in a better position (financially) to take him on under these circumstances.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Jul 13, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beans's already lost it, most likely
Did you see Sean Gallagher was just sent to the Padres as a PTBNL? Eric Patterson hasn’t done squat, and neither has Matt Murton. Josh Donaldson is hitting well in the minors, but he has a ways to go before making up for the production the Cubs got out of Harden last season.
by shawndgoldman on Jul 13, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wrigley Winds
Has anyone charted the wins at Wrigley when Harden pitches? I believe he’s always been a fly ball pitcher, so the wind could really affect his results.
by CubbieFaninOhio on Jul 13, 2009 1:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
actually yeah
Shawn noted that a larger than normal amount of his HR’s have fallen into the “just out” category which could be attributed to half of his games in Wrigley rather than the A’s ballaprk.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I run his stats with an "expected" outcome
His numbers are much better. He’s been unlucky in some cases, in other cases his location has sucked.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, this is great stuff.
I’ve certainly asked myself the very same question during/after Harden’s last two starts. It’s a relief to see that he’s probably not injured.
I guess the only additional question that comes to my mind is: If pitch selection may be part of the problem, what role does the catcher play? The answer would seem to be: Not much.
Soto has caught 12 of Harden’s 14 starts thus far, resulting in a .275 BAA (.852 OPS) and 14 HR.
Hill has caught 2 of Harden’s 14 starts thus far, resulting in a .244 BAA (.821 OPS) and 2 HR.
Last season, Soto caught 8 of Harden’s, resulting in a .140 BAA (.469 OPS) and 4 HR.
I’d guess it’s mostly a matter of bad location coupled with some really poor luck. Like many of the Cubs hitters, Harden probably just hit a slump of sorts in the first half of the season (though not all of his starts were bad) that’s left all of us hoping he’ll rebound in the weeks/months to come.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Jul 13, 2009 2:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
FA, he'd better step it up
I’ve seen him pitch twice in person. Each game he had some good innings, then he started getting the ball up in the zone. He exited shortly thereafter. I don’t know if he is hurt or not, the velocity appears to be there. With impending FA status he may make a push in the second half. We can hope.
by Nibbles on Jul 13, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd take a FA push right about now.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Jul 13, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
as long as he doesn't
push so hard he breaks.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd also take a push-up right now.
Cherry, if you have it.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by dat cubfan daver on Jul 13, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
TWSS
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overall
this has been a really great thread so far
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and to clarify
I have seen Harden’s release point from last year with Pitch FX but earlier in the thread I got so caught up in trying to convince bob that we CAN see the release point that I was wrong about seeing fresh Harden data from this year. I think Harry said he will have something new in a day or two so that will be fun to take a look at.
Whats really cool is how the USS Mariner group did the same thing last year to help the Seattle pitching coach convince King Felix he was relying on his fastball too much early in the count. Thats pretty cool stuff.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
to get actual change is pretty unique. Sometimes data is difficult to interpret.
Maybe Rothschild or harden visit BCB and can take away a thing or two to turn him around? I’d love that.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
shoot
when harry’s stuff comes back I would have no problem asking Al or somebody else to email it to them. No doubt it wont get looked at but you never know. Harry’s name might carry some weight he will probably be the next SABR guy to get hired by a FO
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They'll see it
A few teams send interns to scrape and gather articles, I’m pretty sure the Cubs are one of them.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well then
this might be a useful thing to get in the next few days. I’m sure Larry and Co have a great idea but data like this is always useful. Hopefully the Cubs will give you an interview Harry : )
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
an intern seeing it is one thing
and how often they see this stuff is another. Someone over there is a regular visitor, a couple times a week, but “they’ll see it” is a flip way of putting it. And, the stuff we’re looking for in terms of arm angle, they can see that better than we can in more ways than one. If I do find something, they’ll already know it.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you never know
harry. Keep plugging away, I would bet in a year or so you will be on some teams payroll.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the challenge a lot of teams face
Those who have gotten a handle on it find it useful
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anybody
know Harden’s babip?
Also, Shawn you have noted that a higher than average # of his HR’s are in the barely out variety. Is it possible to ID exaclty which ones those are and correlate them with the list you have over at ACB? I might be interesting to note whether hitters are hitting more no doubt HR’s against the fastball or the change.
by CalCalender on Jul 13, 2009 7:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Baseball-Reference.com
has it at .326.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/h/harderi01-pitch.shtml
His average over 7 years is .280. Last year, it was .252.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 13, 2009 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW
great thread, I’m really glad to see this stuff getting talked about
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 13, 2009 9:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I just read your post at Beyond the Boxscore
where you compared Harden and Greinke. You wrote this:
*We have very little 2007 on Harden
He’s not throwing as hard, that’s for sure. He’s low-mid instead of mid-upper 90s.
by Harry Pavlidis on Jul 9, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs*
I’ve brought up the lack of velocity numerous times and it seems to get glossed over. Could you provide more details on your findings? I think hitting 95+ in 21 of 24 starts in 2008 versus 2009 only having 7 of 13 is a big deal. It shows a significant decline in his velocity, yet posters talk about the “average” speed which doesn’t mean a thing to me as I look for more variance. The saying goes, “MLB hitters can time a bullet if they know it’s coming every time.” I would appreciate any data you have regarding his lost velocity.
Thanks Harry.
by socalbob on Jul 13, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great, great thread
Really appreciate the contributions here guys. From my untrained eye, it looks like the data suggests mostly bad luck combined with some control issues and maybe a minor issue with velocity variance.
by paulucla on Jul 14, 2009 10:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
shoulda donw this three days ago...
♫He climbs the mound
And breaks his leg
Her labrum’s got a tear
She waltzs on his way to bat
And trips the stair
And underneath his baseball cap
He has a chain around his neck!
I’ve even heard him singing in the shower
She’s always late for Lou,
But his penitence is true
He’s always late for everything
Except for every meal
I hate to have to say it but I very firmly feel
Rich Harden’s not an asset to the ball club
I’d like to say a word in his behalf:
Rich Hardens’s strikeouts make me laugh
How to you solve a problem like Rich Harden…♪
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 14, 2009 3:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
New Answer: Maybe nothing's wrong.
by Orval Overall on Jul 17, 2009 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
can you
articulate this in a chart?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 17, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me try
X X X X X X
XX X X X
X X X X X
X X X X X
X X X X X
X XX X X
X X X X X X
X
by Orval Overall on Jul 17, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shoot
When I typed that out the Xs made a giant “No”
Stupid formatting. Or stupid me, whichever you prefer.
by Orval Overall on Jul 17, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
web comment
know no spacing…
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Jul 17, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe he read this thread
and made some adjustments? :-D
I did not see the game so I am hoping to see the game charts. Sounds like his velocity was up. A very positive sign. I think it starts with velocity as it will further separate his change from his fastball.
Great news and let’s hope he continues this for the next 12-15 starts.
by socalbob on Jul 17, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















