Baseball Prospectus Q&A with Hendry
A little less interesting than I was hoping for, but still worth looking at.
4 months ago
MJMars
5 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Too bad...
…you have to be a subscriber to read it. Care to highlight the “worth looking at” stuff?
by bakester on Jul 13, 2009 11:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's a part I found interesting.
DL is David Lauria, the interviewer. “Wasserstrom” is Chuck Wasserstrom, the Cubs director of baseball information. He mentions the Milton Bradley decision.
DL: Your background is more scouting-oriented, while Wasserstrom’s is more statistical-analysis based. Are you finding that the two of you generally come to similar conclusions regarding the projectable future performance of players you look at?
JH: Absolutely. At the end of the day, I make the final call, but we put months into that decision. Obviously, what [Bradley] did the last couple of years, offensively, was exactly what we were looking for. Of course, they’re not all robots and they don’t always do what you want them to do. We had eight guys in the All-Star Game last year, who are this team right now, and I don’t know if any of those eight are going to make it this year. It’s hard to put your finger on that and predict.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al on Jul 13, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm confused
Wood isn’t there . . . was he including Bradley? Kind of ambiguous.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Jul 13, 2009 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When talking about defense
Hendry was asked about his philosophy on defense and defensive metrics. He said he doesn’t look at the defensive metrics, going almost completely off what the scouts tell him. That frustrated me a bit….
churchofbaseball.com
by MJMars on Jul 13, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs



















