Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

While I know it's unlikely, the Cubs have the type of young talent the Jays are looking for. Is losing Jake Fox and/or Sam Fuld worth adding another ace to the rotation? I don't think so.

over 2 years ago Poster_tiny Mike Martin 69 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

no way

i agree – no way i’d give up a guy like fuld for roy halladay.

by John T. Unger on Jul 19, 2009 7:46 PM CDT reply actions  

LOL

The sun will shine in '69

by gaclaudy on Jul 19, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

sarcasm_1

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would pack Fox's bags and drive Fuld to the airport

The story said it would likely take Wells or Hart as a centerpiece, Harden as a salary-clearer and Fox.

I’d do that deal in a damn second.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jul 19, 2009 7:58 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

Wouldn’t even bat an eyelash

"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies." - Mike Royko

by DTJchris on Jul 19, 2009 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, and I'd take the Jays' GM out to dinner

if he pulled the trigger on that deal.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Jul 19, 2009 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would take

Hart AND Wells to acquire Halladay and thats probably just the foundation

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Jul 20, 2009 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely...

If we let Sam Fuld be the reason we don’t get Halladay, that’d be about 1,000 times worse than letting Felix Pie be the reason we didn’t get Brian Roberts.

Can’t see there being any possibility the Jays would actually do this.

Ohhhh I don't know, I got a guy on the other line about some whitewalls - I'll call you back.

by kifaru37 on Jul 19, 2009 8:20 PM CDT reply actions  

The Cubs are NOT getting Halladay.

This is silly to even consider.

1. We don’t need starting pitching.

2. Other teams have a much stronger desire to get him.

3. Other teams have much better pieces to trade to the Blue Jays.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Jul 19, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

agree 100%

BUT:

Is losing Jake Fox and/or Sam Fuld worth adding another ace to the rotation?

Um, Yes.

Ohhhh I don't know, I got a guy on the other line about some whitewalls - I'll call you back.

by kifaru37 on Jul 19, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right.

I was agreeing with you too.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Jul 20, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree for the most part

And I think it’s a pipedream BUT I don’t care how much SP you have. You never have enough Halladay caliber pitchers. BTW we have exactly none of those calibers.

Go Cubs Go!!!!

by cubsluver22 on Jul 19, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with points 2 and 3...

…but, with Lilly’s aches and pains lately, I’ve come to believe there is simply no such thing has having enough (or too much) starting pitching.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course you can't have too much starting good starting pitching...

But the point is that we need help in other areas, before we should address SP.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Jul 20, 2009 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I dunno...adding a Roy Halladay to your roster...

…can solve a lot of other problems – namely the bullpen. (He is, after all, Mr. CG.) But this is probably all academic because I doubt Hendry is seriously pursuing Roy.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

But when the game isn’t until 6, it’s fun to talk about regardless!

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Jul 20, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't Forget...

… Doc can block any trade he wants. Say the Brewers offer the Jays the best package of players and are willing to pay the money. Doc can still veto it.

My 2008 Christmas wish list includes this jersey. In Hendry We Trust! Current 2009 payroll.

by initram on Jul 20, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Will Hallady get us a division championship?

Well let’s look at a few different scenarios:

1) He’s a workhorse. He’ll pitch a complete game with ease. Saving our bullpen any game is a good game.
2) Pitching him in series vs. Cardinals/Brewers/Astros is a plus.
3) Our starting ERA is third in NL. Starting pitching is not our problem.
4) Cubs are #13 in NL with batting average at .250. I believe that’s up to date.
     Reds are .249
     Cardinals are .254
     Brewers are .256
     Pirates are .259
     Astros are .267
We can use a bat or hope Soriano/Fontenot can stay hot for the next few months.

From my 4 points above, Halladay is a luxary. But unless Cubs can consistently score more runs he might not be enough to provide a divisional championship. But putting him in games against our division rivals and winning those games could be enough to do that.

by ak123 on Jul 19, 2009 8:42 PM CDT reply actions  

What's most striking about that...

is that the Cardinals are .254 and that’s WITH Pujols having another amazing season. Why he isn’t walked intentionally every time I have no idea.

Pujols: .333 Avg, .456 OBP, .730 SLG, 1.186 OPS!?!, 76 R, 34 HR, 90 RBI, 232 TB, 73 BB
Rest of the team: .247 AVG, .306 OBP, .374 SLG, .681 OPS, 335 R, 131 HR, 300 RBI, 1039 TB, 240 BB

In other words, Pujols alone accounts for 18.5% or their Runs, 13.4% of their Hits, 20.6% of their HR, 18.25% of their TB, 23% of their RBI, and 23% of their BB.

by CubFan81 on Jul 20, 2009 6:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is absurdity.

First of all, the writer is clearly speculating, and has no firm basis for this speculation.

Second, the Cubs don’t match up well with the Blue Jays for a deal.

Third, the Cubs don’t need starting pitching. The starting pitching has been excellent. They could use some bullpen help and a bat, possibly a catcher.

Move along, nothing to see here.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jul 19, 2009 8:44 PM CDT reply actions  

You can never have enough starting pitching

A rotation of Halladay, Lilly, Zambrano, Dempster and either Hart or Welles?

To quote Annie Savoy:

“Oh my”

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jul 19, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

A rotation with a rejuvenated

Harden would look much better (with a Halladay addition as well). On a whole side note, I gotta imagine that if a big deal like this were to happen (not expecting it), that Randy Wells could be an option to be dealt, particularly since Toronto liked him but couldn’t find a spot for him.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 3:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Power Pitching is KING!

I haz comedy show in August. You come seez it please?: Hot Beans Delivers

by digitalbenjamin on Jul 20, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Al, completely disagree on the 2nd point

The Cubs match up much better with the Brewers than a lot of teams that are rumored to be searching.

Top shortstop prospect? Check.
Top 3rd base prospect? Check.
Top pitching prospect? Check.
Raw upside to deal from in the lower levels? Check.
Stopgap players to deal from in the upper levels?

I’m not suggesting we package Vitters, Castro, Jackson/Cashner, and more, but the Cubs match up a lot better with the Blue Jays than people think.

That said, I don’t see how we can handle it, and I don’t think we should go all-in. But for an elite talent like Halladay, I’d consider a deal if we could handle the finances without stripping the system bare. I’m just not expecting it. Particularly since there’s a part of me that thinks Lilly, who overachieved in the first half, will slide back a bit, wonders how long Z can continue pitching like it was 4 years ago, and worries about Wells workload. Again, not expecting it and I wouldn’t strip the farm for 1.5 years of him when the need isn’t huge, but it’s unlikely we deal for pen help and there really isn’t a bat out there that fits (if Fukudome doesn’t hit, I’d rather give Fuld a look than some of the options on the market (potentially), corner IF/OF are pretty much set, Theriot isn’t going anywhere under Lou, and I am fine with Baker/Fontenot). I guess another MI (I mean, we were rumored in on Lugo), maybe a Shoppach or another backup catcher, and/or maybe a pen arm would be the only things I could potentially expect).

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 3:29 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.

by DGU on Jul 20, 2009 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

I have to say, I really agree with Al on this. Right now, 1) the money doesn’t match, as the Cubs don’t have the ability to easily absorb his contract, and the Jays won’t offer a window to negotiate a new deal. 2) the needs don’t match, with this team begging for at least a productive, versatile bat off the bench more than anything else. And lastly, yes, the farm system is a touch light to speak too seriously about this deal.

I mean it could happen, but really, where’s the sizzle here?

by Damen Jackson on Jul 20, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think a Cubs' deal for Halladay seems likely.

I don’t think toonsterwu claims that either.

What I do think is that the Cubs’ farm system is underrated consistently by fans. In particular, I think it’s a lot more likely that the Cubs would deal Vitters-Castro-Jackson than the Brewers, for example, will deal Escobar-Gamel. And it’s that willingness to deal young prospects that gives Jim Hendry an edge over other GMs who have better ranked prospects.

Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.

by DGU on Jul 20, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well,

the question as I understood it was if there was a “match” there. I wouldn’t argue whether there are tradeable assets there in the Cubs system — although I suspect that the Jays might look for more MLB-ready talent in a deal — but I can’t see either side interested in having serious conversations, for various reasons of which talent is just one.

by Damen Jackson on Jul 20, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think your perspective here is unreasonable at all.

I just enjoyed toonsterwu’s stab at it.

Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.

by DGU on Jul 20, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

he has a nice take on things generally.

by Damen Jackson on Jul 20, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I was simply focusing on the talent perspective, as we have the pieces at the positions they want. Financially and need wise, the fit is not there, and I am not expecting it.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting perspective - rec'd as well.

I don’t think Hendry would/will pull the trigger, but interesting nonetheless.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't either

Unless the price was ridiculously right. And let’s face it, such a deal would likely use up a Randy Wells (or it would cause us to go heavy in), and neither one is that appetizing at this moment in time. I’m not sold Wells can keep up his efforts (I mean, case can be made that he’s been our best pitcher).

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

except for one thing in that I would expect that the Jays might want someone closer to the majors. The Cubs could package some lower level guys but teams like Phils, Rangers, Giants, etc. have closer to ready players.

Agreed that the Cubs might match up better than the Brewers however the Brewers need Halladay more. The Breers though might not be able to swing the salary since they would need to cover next season as well.

by rlpete on Jul 20, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

oops I had a typo

why’d i say match up with the brewers. I meant Blue Jays.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't even read the article

Not possible.

"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 19, 2009 9:10 PM CDT reply actions  

See toonsterwu's post above.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I love the farm

Following the farm system is fun, particularly with some of the people here that follow really closely. But look, at the end of the day, to paraphrase an average coach, you play to win the game. No, you shouldn’t clear a farm for Halladay, largely because I’m not sure that Toronto has the elite offers that they are looking for, but if for some reason we can do it (not expecting it) and we can avoid clearing the farm (put it this way, if we can avoid having 3 of our top 4 prospects involved), then I think you ponder it irregardless of the depleted farm. Short of it is, the depleted farm comment is what has me replying. The farm is about value, as are trades and transactions. It’s about the best organizational decision to win.

(Our top 4 prospects, in some order, would be Vitters, Jackson, Castro, Cashner, imo.)

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 3:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

On the bright side

If this is your first fanpost, your next is sure to be an improvement.

Is losing Jake Fox and/or Sam Fuld worth adding another ace to the rotation? I don’t think so.

Wow – ERIC HANNA LIVES.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Jul 19, 2009 11:16 PM CDT reply actions  

And it's not even a Fanpost - it's a Fanshot.

I have hope for this one.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah my bad

Got to give him credit for making it a fanshot.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Jul 20, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

bleh

not sure why i got bored and clicked the link. It’s a bleacher report thing. Also, to suggest Fox or Fuld as a key part of any deal is um … let’s leave it at that.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 3:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Also, something to consider...

is THIS article by Buster Olney (ESPN Insider) that compares the Halladay situation to Johan Santana’s a few years ago.

Though Santana was 4 years younger, they both had 1 year left on their contracts (so not a 1 race rental like Sabathia), they both had no trade clauses and in Santana’s situation teams were hesitant to offer much by way of prospects because of the likely high value extension to follow.

It is a bit of a pipe dream but then again, nothing ventured, nothing gained. If the Cubs don’t even make an offer then they’ll never know. It doesn’t need to be a farm gutting offer but something serious enough to keep them in the loop and at least keep the Jays interested enough to come back and say “Yes, but add/swap X, Y, Z” or “No thanks, we’ve got something else.”

by CubFan81 on Jul 20, 2009 6:38 AM CDT reply actions  

OT: Looking at the Halladay race, sans Cubs

I’m not one to believe that the Toronto Blue Jays are going to get a knock your socks off deal, a Teixeira like deal. It’s possible, but with teams protecting their prospects more and with the economy as it is (cost-controlled talent is meaningful), I’m just not sold. A very good deal, yes. A knock your socks off deal? Only time will tell. In the end, it only takes 2 teams, or 1 rash team. Taking a spin

New York Yankees – If they don’t put in Hughes or Chamberlain, I don’t see how they can get it done. I don’t believe the Blue Jays would deal Halladay for salary relief (that is, I think a Doc trade will be focused on the talent in return). The Yankees system isn’t bad, but it’s not good. Probably in that mid-tier. There’s some solid, intriguing talent like Austin Jackson (potential 20 HR OF that can handle CF decently), Zach McAllister (has he gotten off the DL? I’ve long been a huge fan of this strike throwing mid-rotation guy), slugger Jesus Montero, catcher Austin Romine, and some others. I mean … without Hughes or Chamberlain, I can’t envision a scenario where the Blue Jays take a deal. The talent is ok, but the fit for their need isn’t that high. Even if the Yankees took Vernon Wells contract and offered their, say, top 4 prospects, I’m not so sure the Blue Jays do it, particularly since Toronto likely wants to extract a premium.

Boston – They certainly matchup a lot better to make a deal, with a lot of arms in the system to dangle out there (such as Casey Kelly, although he’s playing short right now in his half/half program, Junichi Tazawa, Michael Bowden, Stoley Pimentel, Nick Hagadone, and some big league pen arms) and some positional prospects. The matchup isn’t great (top shortstop talent is probably Yamaico Navarro in High A) but it can work when you are talking some of their top OF talent (Josh Reddick, Ryan Kalish, Che-Hsuan Lin), a potential slugger like Lars Anderson (been struggling a tad). But Toronto likely wants a premium here as well.

Chicago White Sox – Most reports suggest Gordon Beckham is off limits, which would hurt Kenny’s chances of making this happen. That said, trade Kenny is always willing to deal from his chips, so they are a team to watch. I believe Dan Hudson is their top pitching prospect (and a case could perhaps be made, thier top prospect) although Aaron Poreda will get more nods. Big, strapping kid who has flown through the system, Hudson feels like he’s got some TOR ability. Is Poreda a big league pen arm? I could see maybe Gavin Floyd figuring into the equation if the teams truly talked. There’s an end of the rotation type arm, potentially, in John Ely, and a few other guys. Positionally, Dayan Viciedo has been bad. Tyler Flowers is a quality slugger who could fill a C/1st/DH type job. Brent Morel is a decent 3rd base guy but only in High A. I’m really not sure I see the fit. There’s some pieces. They are a bit thin on the positional side for my liking, so would a trade like Dan Hudson, Aaron Poreda, Tyler Flowers, and one get it done? Possible.

Detroit Tigers – They supposedly have the budgetary room (the implication to me seems to suggest that they could provide salary relief by taking a contract) but they just don’t have the chips. Ryan Perry’s a pen arm. Casey Crosby’s a kid from Maple Park, a big lefty, but he’s in Low A with some control concerns. There’s some other power pen arms, but the fit’s not there. On a side note, their draft last year is one that I point to as a bad draft. Got some value, but they went heavy on guys that project as pen arms, and one would guess that part of the reason was due to the fact that their pen struggled so mightily. Don’t like it, should never draft like that.

Los Angeles Angels – The system’s slipped, and with Jordan Walden’s recent injury, the chances of a deal are slim (as has been reported) unless they pony up some big league talent. System wise, Trevor Reckling is a very intriguing lefty. That said, major control concerns, but he’s 20 in AA. Another intriguing 20 year old is Will Smith, another lefty, but he’s down in Low A. Ryan Chaffee may rise up a bit this offseason, as he’s had a strong Low A debut, but the walks are bothersome. Reports sound good, though. There’s some other arms, but that’s their problem – the arm talent isn’t there. A package with a Brandon Wood and maybe another positional piece is a nice way to start, but it’s hard to see the match.

Texas Rangers – Loaded. They can make the deal if they wanted. Therein lies the question – do they want to sell those chips? With plenty of arms like Holland, Feliz, Kiker, Perez, and so on, they can make the deal. With strong positional assets at catcher and with a slugger like Justin Smoak, the options are there. There really isn’t a top shortstop or third base talent, but the quality is good enough elsewhere. Problem is, will Jon Daniels dive in?

New York Mets – It’s hard for me to buy this system as having enough. Jenrry Mejia has had a strong season, and the 19 year old is in AA. Looks intriguing. Brad Holt’s a nice arm in AA. Jefry Marte and Wilmer Flores haven’t set the world alight in Low A. Jon Niese is an intriguing upper level arm. The gigantic Scott Moviel (6’11" 235) is one of those guys that, if he puts it together, he might be intriguing, but a lot of moving parts. The positional talent just isn’t there. Reese Havens has been okay in High A. Would Omar get rash and go with an all-in? They certainly need another arm, but even an all-in might not be enough.

Philadelphia Phillies – They’ve got the chips to make a deal, with intriguing arms in Kyle Drabek (I like him a lot, though I think he’s getting a tad overrated), Antonio Bastardo, Carlos Carrasco, Jason Knapp (ridiculous 111 K’s in 85 innings, granted MWL … but he’s 18!), big leaguer JA Happ, along with interesting potential “role” arms like Joe Savery, Mike Stutes, Andrew Carpenter, and others. They’ve got two of the best minor league OF talents in Michael Taylor and Dominic Brown, a decent shortstop talent (Jason Donald, although I’m surprised how much the bat disappeared), some decent catching talent (d’Arnaud and Marson), some raw talent like Anthony Hewitt, Zach Collier, Anthony Gose. I think they’ll have to put in at least Drabek and a top OF prospect, along with Jason Donald to start the package (drabek still carries a tinge of risk … at least a year or two away). The Phillies system caught up on me in terms of their quality. They draft for tools, but prior to this year, it was okay. Guys really stepped forward, though.

St. Louis Cardinals – I’ve come to believe this is an overrated system. Solid, but overrated. I love Brett Wallace’s bat, but what position does this man play outside 1st/DH. At his size, it’s going to be a lumbering LF if he plays that, and you probably wouldn’t want him at third for an extended period. Darryl Jones is a decent OF. Bryan Anderson is a decent catcher. Pete Kozma’s a solid looking shortstop prospect, but I don’t love the fact that he takes awhile to settle in. Just one of those bothersome things, but it really isn’t an issue, and he’s 21 years old in AA. A package of Wallace/Kozma is bound to get attention, but the arms side? There just isn’t anything to excite you. A bunch of power pen arms (and another one may be shipped to Cleveland to complete the DeRosa deal) and end of the rotation type starters, or raw upside kids far away. They’ve already indicated an unwillingness to go all-in.

Milwaukee Brewers – They just completed a Cole Gillespie/Roque Merceds for Felipe Lopez deal. Doesn’t really impact their ability to make a big deal. The system’s thinned a bit, and Jeffress’ suspension doesn’t help. With an elite shortstop talent in Alcides Escobar, though, that will always get attention. Mat Gamel can hit. Where he plays, who knows, but he can hit. Brett Lawrie was a good looking Canadian prospect who has done well in the MWL. In the first half, it was Lawrie or Vitters who many people considered the top MWL hitting prospect. Jon Lucroy has struggled with the bat in AA, but he’s still a decent looking catcher prospect. The problem is, where are the arms? Jake Odorizzi was linked to us briefly last year, and he’s a nice asset … in rookie league. Chris Cody is one of those end of the rotation types. Well, there is Manny Parra, and if they put Parra in there, they can make it happen. Will Melvin deal Escobar and/or Gamel? I think the next week or so will be huge, if they slip, I think this goes by the wayside.

Los Angeles Dodgers – If you want the team that I think best fits the Blue Jays needs, I think it’s the Dodgers. This is really a loaded team right now, with a strong bullpen (and reinforcements potentially coming soon), a loaded lineup with youngsters flourishing, and a pitching staff with youngsters flourishing. Kershaw’s not going anywhere, but James MacDonald might be available. He’s a solid looking potential number 2 starter type, IMO. Then, there’s a slugging 3rd base prospect in Josh Bell, and several shortstops to choose from, from the ready (Chin-lung Hu) to the upside (Dee Gordon). Add in some decent arms in the system. Problem is, this probably isn’t a knock your socks off package. The upside in the Phillies package would be better.

San Francisco Giants – This one holds the most intrigue. The first think you do is say … why. For a team with Lincecum/Cain, that’s a nice duo, with Johnson/Sanchez following up (I mean, obviously, rotation wouldn’t be set like that). The reason it holds intrigue for me is for a variety of reasons. The Giants system is solid, but a bit top heavy. Excellent pitchers line the top with Madison Bumgarner, one of the best in the minors, and Tim Alderson, what I’d call a “workmanlike” quality arm. There’s a bevy of arms beneath that are intriguing enough, from low down like Jorge Bucardo, to a guy like Clayton Tanner, and a couple others. There’s a top catcher in Buster Posey (doubt he’s going anywhere), a potential slugging first baseman in Angel Villalona, a decent shortstop talent in Brandon Crawford, and some other decent pieces (Roger Kieschnick, Conor Gillaspie). Reason why this intrigues me

a) salary relief – the Giants have some flexibility and could offer it
b) Potential bat acquisition – A Scott Rolen could be intriguing (moving Sandoval to first). Could a Vernon Wells or Alex rios fit into the equation if the right money can be worked out.
c) the Matt Cain factor – it’s something to ponder. As it stands, Roy Halladay is under control for the rest of this year and through 2010. I believe Matt Cain’s arbitration years were bought out through 2011 (well, there’s a 2011 club option, I think that’s his last arb year, though). That’s a one year difference in control. As good as Cain has been, most people would take Halladay now and next year. Could the Giants try to make a big play, hoping Lincecum and Halladay, plus a little luck, goes a long way? Blue Jays would get a quality arm to control for an extra year. It’s one of those, no way … could it type scenarios for me.

This sort of leads into one final point. Darkhorses haven’t really been mentioned, and Halladay will control his destination to a certain extent. That said, most people really haven’t pondered the idea of a team making a short term play for the next year and a half. It probably won’t happen, but it’s something to consider. A team like Tampa, still owning a sweet system, could really use a starter. The Marlins? A bit less likely, but they have the positional chips. The Twins? They need an arm, could they work a package together? The Rockies? Probably not, but Doc is from Colorado and their system has talent. There’s also a “it’s so unlikely, but the thought crossed my mind” in the Reds. Their pitching has been inconsistent. They still need the offense to come through, but with a loaded system, if they get into it, the thought has crossed my mind.

Which leads to the final, final point … I wouldn’t expect any movement (if a trade happens) to be until late in the month. I think a lot of teams are going to use the next week or so to gauge their position.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 6:52 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Prediction

Halladay goes nowhere.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jul 20, 2009 6:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

gut feeling

says he gets dealt. That said, I’ve been wrong plenty of times, but the situation is right for the move, even if Blue Jays fans don’t buy it. Granted, the same rationale held for Brian Roberts, but one would hope that Ricciardi isn’t as foolish as Baltimore (granted, Ricciardi hasn’t exactly done a bang-up job in Toronto – as for why I thought Roberts was a bad move on their part, and potentially, an Angelos order,, is because he won’t be a key part of their future squad when they are ready to compete and he was getting up there age wise). Problem is, they are in the toughest division in baseball, with 3 teams better, and one team nipping at the heel. The chances of resigning Halladay long term? Slim veering to none. Gambling on everything coming together next year seems like a fool’s bet. The system needs help, and they won’t be able to get scot free from all the contracts, so they’ll need some younger chips. They’ve somewhat started the process, and a Hill/Lind/Snider future sounds intriguing, with maybe a JP Arenciba in some role. With 1.5 years remaining, this is the best time to deal him. With Halladay having control, the bigger market winter might not necessarily happen. There’s also the ability to capitalize off desperation (Phillies) or a team trying to avoid being trumped by another squad.

If I had to handicap it right now, my hunch would be

Phillies and Dodgers 30% each – Phillies have the desperation. Dodgers can offer a quality package that they can afford to give up.

White Sox and Giants – 10% each. Will Kenny sell the farm? I think the Giants thing might have some teeth in terms of its potential, and I think the Cain thing is something to ponder (and there were rumblings awhile ago that the Giants may ponder selling high on Cain and restocking with Bumgarner). I wouldn’t expect Bumgarner or Posey to be offered in any package.

Another club – non AL East – 10%. Could division rivals work itself into a deal? Doubt it, but something to ponder.

An AL East squad scoops in – 5%. Just don’t see it, but can’t rule it out.

Halladay stays put – 5%.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Phillies or bust

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jul 20, 2009 7:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

They are going to have to pony up

but yeah, they are the most desperate. A team clearly able to win this year, but desperately needing pitching, and a system that snuck up in it’s quality. Might be the right time to sell high and go for gold. That said, they won’t get an easy deal, and we have to see if Doc is willing to go there (not due to desperation, but more due to the pieces not being the best fit, as the Blue Jays don’t have OF spots for anyone, and Drabek is at least a year, if not two (or even 3) away.). I think, it’s at least going to take Drabek, one of the OF’s, Donald, and one more arm.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

As of right now - I agree.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

hahahahahaha

This is the most ridculous thing I’ve ever read on this site. The sad thing is that you are serious. Just to clarify, Sam Fuld and Jake Fox are both 27. That’s not really “young talent”.

by McRipper on Jul 20, 2009 8:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Right.

This was a typical “our crap for your star” fantasy league trade proposal.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jul 20, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hart, Fox and Fuld

will not get Halladay. The Jays will want someone with high upside. The author of the Bleacher Report story really has no clue.

by rlpete on Jul 20, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions  

so what you're saying is

we need to part with Scales?

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Jul 20, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

2 MUCH!!!1!!

MAYBE WE COULD GET THEM 2 TAKE DUBOYZ OR ERIN MILEZ. KTHXBYE.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

GETITDON EJIM!

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Jul 20, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

ONLY IF THEY THROW IN ADAM LIND. I THINK THE CUBS SHOULD GET HIM 2!!!

"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." - Alvin Dark

by Fishbone2 on Jul 20, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I Heard Kap Speculate...

… that Vitters, Wells, Marshall, Fox and Marmol wouldn’t be enough. I find that hard to believe.

My 2008 Christmas wish list includes this jersey. In Hendry We Trust! Current 2009 payroll.

by initram on Jul 20, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

It depends on how serious the Jays are

at wanting to get a SS out of this deal. SS is such a shallow position right now, with no one really good on the 2010 free agent market. I could see the Jays with their eyes on Alcides Escobar, Brandon Wood, Gordon Beckham, etc. and not really willing to listen to other deals w/o a top SS offering.

Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.

by DGU on Jul 20, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Three pre-arb...

MLB pitchers — including an All-Star — and a top 50 prospect? I find it hard to believe to.

by Damen Jackson on Jul 20, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

me too

and that’s an automatic no, imo. That’s just too much for 1.5 years of a guy in this market, particularly since Wells is cost-controlled cheap and so far, ridiculously good.

by toonsterwu on Jul 20, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great horny toads

Roy Halladay? To the Cubs?

Well….you’d best be prepared to offer up something like Josh Vitters, Jay Jackson, Carlos Marmol, Randy Wells. And that isn’t even going to be enticing enough by itself. Plus, the Cubs have ZERO payroll room to fit somthing like this.

$136 million payroll for a .500 style ballclub. Good work Jim.

by BLou on Jul 20, 2009 12:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Zero?

That’s not what I’ve read. Hendry has about $5-7 million to work with this year. Of course this doesn’t allow for Halladay this year, next year, or any other year for that matter.

My point is that Hendry has room to work with, but not at all suggesting it involves even looking at Halladay.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Jul 20, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Halladay will wind up with the Phillies or Yankees

$136 million payroll for a .500 style ballclub. Good work Jim.

by BLou on Jul 20, 2009 12:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I think it'll be the Phillies.

I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

by daver on Jul 20, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think were blowing smoke

1. The cheap a%* cubs have money to do what they want and have the players.The teams that wanna win spend money..we have lots of prospects in the minors. I wouldnt part with fox tho i’d dump badly and play huff or fox in right take the loss or try to trade the moron.The other thing cubs should do is get freddy sanchez fonts is not cutting it.Or you can go get lugo who would come cheap that has speed and can hit.We always look at the money issue cubs make nuttin but money screw them tell them to spend it..!!
2.I dont think we will do anything tell we get the new owners in.zell is an a$$ and hendrys to dumb.Hendry needs to take it like a man and face it he made a mistake and make a move and take the blame.

by tazz34 on Jul 21, 2009 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  292 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski