Sour grapes thou it be the Cubs still don't do well against good NL teams
Hence why I unfortunately still feel comfortable with my rotten prediction on how this season will ultimately shake out. I'm sorry, but the Cubs remain a deeply flawed and mess of a team. Donuts Hendry pulled off a nice move in getting Grabow and Gorzy, but I'm still not at all sold on this lineup or this defense or this bullpen getting it's act together to pull of making the playoffs in 2009. Even in the wretched NL Central. But kindly prove how I am wrong about this team's ability to perform well against the good competition of the NL. Yes, even the Florida Marlins fall into that category in the extremely watered down National League. Cubs can't beat the friggin Marlins for crying out loud. This weekend was illustrative of the root problems with this team.
You are now invited to crap on the messenger as always. Let the feeding frenzy begin.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
298 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Worf vs BLou
This looks like more fun:

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions
No...
What I would like to understand from “intelligent minds” (i.e., not those BCB members who think Jake Peavy is garbage) is WHY anyone should feel good about this Cub team. I’m frankly tired of this excuse that St. Louis sucks worse than us and we therefore can back into the NL Central. Gee, THAT’S inspirational and a rallying cry !!!
Cubs don’t do well against quality competition. So we can beat the crap out of the Washington Nationals, Cincinnati Reds and Houston Astros. But we can’t beat teams like Florida.
So wise ones please o’ please explain to me why a Cub fan should be so bloody optimistic.
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
Didn't the Cubs win
three out of four against Florida in Chicago this year?
by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 2, 2009 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions
who here is saying st. louis sucks?
that’s ridiculous.
"If you play more than two chords, you're showing off."--Woody Guthrie
by buckmulligan on Aug 3, 2009 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Second verse same as the first.
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
nice
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
We're 4-3 against Florida.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 9:36 PM CDT reply actions
Yepper
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
so you're saying that because we haven't beaten the phillies and dodgers enough we're a bad baseball team?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions
the 2006 cardinals sucked too
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
and the 2009 Cards are a WOEFUL 1-4 against the Phillies and 0-4 against the Rockies....
they’re a .500 baseball team.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions
dont worry, theyll run away with the division in no time
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
by jesus christos on Aug 2, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Precisely
The 2009 Chicago Cubs marketing tagline……“The 2006 Cardinals sucked too !!!!!”
Do you all feel GOOD about this?!?!? C’mon, not even the goofy bastards and drool monkeys that overwhelm this board can get behind this primary positive statement for why the 2009 Cubs shall be just fine and dandy.
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
Why did you change your sig?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm fairly certain
he’d rather the Cubs do poorly just so he can say, “I told you so”.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
by ambrosiadreams on Aug 2, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions
He removed the "cardinals will run away with this divison" part.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Good thing we only have 18 games left against teams over .500
Otherwise we would be screwed
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
True, but...
… Philadelphia is a very good team too.
"People shouldn’t bust your chops just because you’re a Sox fan on a Cub board — but I know it happens. FWIW, I think sites like this are more interesting when fans of other teams join in the conversation." by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009
May be screwed anyway
between now and the end of August, the Cubs have 11 games against teams that are at least 10 games above .500. All but 3 of those are on the road. This will tell the story of the season.
BTW
During that same stretch (August) the Cardinals only have 3 games against above .500 teams and mostly they play San Diego, Washington, Cincinnati and Pittsburg the rest of this month, so the goal for the Cubs in August will be to not boat raced.
You know why
Because this is our Cub team. Yes flawed. This is what we have. I hated the Bradley signing, I get worried and run from the TV when Marmol comes into the game, and Gregg has sucked the last two nights. And I am sure there other players who other fans have issue with. But you know what? I will pull for this team flaws and all.
I am not going to gleefully write fanposts dogging this team like I know everything about being a GM, manager and a MLB player like apparently you do.
So have at Blue Lou, kick the dog when its down, I hope the hell this team gets into the playoffs and upsets team after team.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Aug 2, 2009 9:48 PM CDT reply actions 7 recs
But Success = Fail at Failing....
so it will be a failure if we do win.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
kudos
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
The fact this thing is rec'd illustrates how silly folks can be
Interesting that quite probably last year you were completely confident that marmol would white castle the oppostion to oblivion in the 8th yet this year you run from the tele when he comes into the game.
And you call yourself a fan. Pathetic.
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
by Gibbon Jockey on Aug 3, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions
You forgot the sarcasm tag
At least, I hope that you did.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 3, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
true
my bad
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
by Gibbon Jockey on Aug 3, 2009 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Tough loss
There’s a reason many teams are always in contention:
Twins (Nathan)
Yankees (Greatest closer of all time in my opinion: Mariano Rivera
Red Sox: Papelbon
Frankly, anything less than a sweep of Cinci would be dissappointing.
Personally, in the meantime, give Guzman the ball in the 9th
Meanwhile, in reality...
… the difference between a great closer and an average closer is a handful of games a year. I think WPA is a good way to measure the contributions of relievers in terms of their results (even if it doesn’t predict future results very well); Mariano Rivera’s best WPA year was 1996, with 5.26. That’s an outstanding year, don’t get me wrong — Maddux and Pedro have each had a few seasons better, but Rivera routinely contributes about as much to the Yankees as a top-flight starter. The trouble is that the ability to make that contribution is contingent upon the team regularly having leads late in games. Without those opportunities the closer can’t pull a team up very much. A great closer doesn’t take a team from mediocrity to contention, he takes them from contention to the pennant. That’s why rebuilding teams build around position players and, to a lesser degree, starting pitching. The Yankees and Red Sox have been in contention year after year because they’ve been great hitting teams year after year (both have used large payrolls to sign the hitters and starting pitchers that give them late-game leads). The Twins have been able to develop good young talent in-house and have usually fielded good defensive squads. If any of these three teams had to rebuild their closers would likely be the first to go.
by aldimond on Aug 2, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
At the risk of sounding lazy...
…could you give a brief explanation of WPA?
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Works Progress Administration?
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Now that's what I call a New Deal!
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
WPA stands for "win percentage added"
In baseball there are a limited number of situations. That is, combinations of inning, number of outs, score, and configuration of baserunners. By some time in the nineties (or early naughties) some bunch of dorks had a database of play-by-play results of every MLB game played since 1954. So they did what any bunch of dorks with a database would do: a clever denormalization! Specifically, they figured out a team’s odds of winning after each of these situations. WPA measures the change in a team’s odds of winning while a specific player is playing (for a pitcher, just when the pitcher is on the mound; for a batter, just when he’s at the plate). When a home-team starter pitches a scoreless first the home team’s odds of winning go from .540 to .591, so the pitcher is credited with a WPA of .051 (regardless of what happened in that inning, the WPA of the at-bats will add to .051 as long as nobody scores). If the home team wins their odds of winning go from .540 to 1, and the WPA of everyone on the team (hitters and pitchers combined) will be .460, no matter the margin of victory. A home-team closer entering the top of the 9th with one-run lead and closes out the game brings his team’s odds of winning from .866 to 1 and is credited with .134 WPA.
WPA, it turns out, isn’t a great measure of talent over a small sample size — for pitchers it’s sort of like ERA, pitching wins, or saves, in that there are many factors out of a pitcher’s control. In my opinion, however, it’s a simple and elegant measure of results. WPA also elegantly factors in the “leverage” of the situation into the results (so well, in fact, that an auxilliary stat called “leverage index” has been built out of WPA to show the relative impact that an at-bat in each situation will have on the game). A run given up in a tie game means more than one given up in a blowout. A single with a runner on second means more than one given up with the bases empty. A closer today will pitch maybe a third the number of innings per year as a starter, but the closer pitches almost exclusively in high-leverage situations and thus he can have as big an effect on the team’s chances of winning over a whole season — IF he enters enough games with small leads. If the team doesn’t often hold small leads late he’ll never have the chance to make a big difference.
WPA ain’t perfect, and has some issues. First, all the factors that go into it that have little to do with talent. For pitchers: strength of the opposing lineup, defense, luck, the timing of run scoring relative to your run support; for relievers the way a manager uses a pitcher has a big effect on how much WPA he can pick up. But it elegantly factors in how many runners are on base when you’re pulled from or inserted into the game. It elegantly figures the value of a one-run save vs. a three-run save, and the value of a setup appearance vs. a closing one, or even vs. a start; a blown save where the pitcher keeps the game tied vs. one where he implodes (and thus that LaTroy Hawkins was actually pretty good in 2004, blown saves notwithstanding… flame suit on).
I should also mention a couple related stats:
LI = leverage index, a measure of how important a plate-appearance is, normalized so an average situation has LI=1. This gives rise to:
WPA/LI. If you don’t think it’s fair to reward/punish players more in the clutch, you can divide each PA’s WPA by its LI before adding it in. This measure should reward situational hitting/pitching at the plate-appearance level without being quite as noisy as straight WPA, but as far as I’ve read it still doesn’t predict anything all that well.
RE24 = Run Expectancy Added. There are 24 situations within an inning (combinations of baserunner positions and number of outs), and given each position there’s an average number of runs scored in that inning. You can add up a player’s run-expectancy changes to get RE24, which is score-neutral but situation-dependent and not totally leverage-neutral (a solo HR always adds 1 to RE24; an RBI single with runners at first and second, where the runner at first advances to third, adds more than 1). If the first batter in an inning gets on base and the next hits a homer the total RE24 between them is 2, but the guy who got on base gets part of the credit (how much depends which base he got to, so a 2-R HR with a runner on third is worth less than if the runner was on first, which might make sense kind of).
Thanks for the lengthy explanations!
I may need to read these two posts several times before any of this even begins to sink in, but I do appreciate the information.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I think the pitcher's spot came up in the order in the top of the 9th, so Lou pinch hit for him (was it Dome?)
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
He had pitched two innings last night
and he is generally a one inning guy
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 3, 2009 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree except for anything but a sweep being disappointing
Closers for World Series winners last 10 years:
Brad Lidge 41SV 1.95ERA
Jonathan Papelbon 37SV 1.85ERA
Jason Isringhausen 33SV 3.55ERA
Dustin Hermanson 34SV 2.04ERA
Keith Foulke 32SV 2.17ERA
Ugueth Urbine 32SV 1.41ERA w/Marlins
Troy Percival 40SV 1.92ERA
Byun Hyun Kim 19SV 2.94ERA
Mariano Rivera 36SV 2.86ERA
Mariano Rivera 45SV 1.83ERA
Mariano Rivera 36SV 1.91ERA
With exception to Byun Hyun Kim (who still wasn’t that bad but was awful in the World Series) all of these teams had a pitcher with dominant stuff closing out their games. We simply do not have that with Kevin Gregg but could possibly have that with Angel Guzman. Not to mention Gregg has already given up 10HR this year which is unheard of for a closer.
Carlos Marmol is that guy for us
Which is why we need him right for the playoffs.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
I always look forward to your posts B.
I don’t always agree with you and I’m still not sure where exactly this team stacks up against the rest of the league (although, as you point out, the way we tend to play against the better teams is troubling).
What I like most about your posts though is it always sets off a “high school mentality” in certain BCBers-it always kills me that, as much as they don’t like you, they can’t wait to read what you say and then jump all over it. Good for you-it’s fun to see how easy it is for you to stir them up!
No I think
the reason people get jacked at Blue Lou is, he never has anything positive to add. His main inputs are to tear this team down, and enjoy it while doing it.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
What precisely am I supposed to be so wondrously positive about with this Cub team????
The main arguments given on this blog for why the Cubs are in dandy shape in 2009 are the following.
1. The 2006 Cardinals weren’t good during the regular season, yet went on to win a World Series
2. The 2009 Cardinals aren’t much competition for winning the NL Central
If these are the two primary reasons for feeling mighty about the 2009 Chicago Cubs then I’m sorry but something is horribly amiss.
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
How about...
the 2009 Cubs have yet to play baseball to the level their players have consistently played in previous years, and they’re less than a game out of first place.
Nah…never mind…just keep pissing and moaning and telling us we’re doomed.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions
that makes sense, SWL
thats not allowed here
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
by jesus christos on Aug 2, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions
You are completely right

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Thinly veiled code for "I'm waiting for the guess hitting hack to go on one of his patented hot streaks" ???
Why don’t you have the nut sack to come out and say what you really mean instead of couching everything in “non-controversial” words so as not to offend any of the butt kissers and those who would rather talk religion on this board???
Exhibit A for mamby pamby.
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
what I really mean is...
you seem almost DISAPPOINTED that we’re still in contention. You fumble around not really saying much until something mildly bad happens and then you spring into action with a post reminding us all how fucked we are.
You’re act is almost as repetitive and MUCH MUCH older than mine.
YAWN.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
Rec'd
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Aug 2, 2009 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Your act will never be less repetitive and older than Blou's

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions
perfectly ok
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
what,
you mean to their potential???
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
yes, the team has not played up to their potential.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 3, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
So we
all should follow the leader BLou, and be pissed off about this team, screw it, no hope, no chance.
Sorry buddy don’t live my life that way, I will pull for the Cubs to win tomorrow, how about you?
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
Must I point out you only really comment
when something bad hapens?
Your comments when the team was winning on the home stand were pretty tame. You were nearly invisible. You didn’t really say anything of note.
The straw that stirs the drink…. please….
“donuts” Hendry?
Cheap.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 3, 2009 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
My only conern, BLou
is why you only come around here after tough losses. I didn’t hear you calling us all these things during the last homestand. We lost 2 of 3 in Florida, yes. But we always play poorly in Miami. The fact is, if our closer had gotten 2 more outs today, we would’ve taken 2 out of 3. I really want to respect your opinion, but it’s hard when you’re so one-sided. Show me how “flawed” we are (even after winning 7 of our last 10), the next time we spit off 6 wins in 8 games. Until then, I reserve judgement.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
I've been a diehard since 1977
Like you, I’m entitled to my own damn jaded perceptions of this Cub franchise. I have sat my ass down for games at Wrigley hundreds upon hundreds of times. My tickets and other support have subsidized this load of manure franchise for over three decades.
I WANT TO WIN, period. I don’t live in delusion any longer about this Cub team. The 2005 Chicago White Sox winning the World Series was the official tipping point for me. No more of this Luvable Loser bullshit. No more of this rose-colored glasses crap. No more curses, no more excuses, no more pinning literally everything on the shoulders of the manager.
I want to win. And this 2009 Chicago Cubs team ain’t going to win diddly shit. Hence my pissed-off-aness.
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
So your just jealous of the White Sox...got it.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, that enters into it
It should enter into it for any self-respecting Cub fan. And yeah, I look at how Kenny Williams runs the show for the White Sox and am green with envy.
I’m sick of losing, period. We actually have had dozens of threads on this board this season that RELISH in the excuse making….the weather hasn’t been warm enough, Geovany Soto thought he was smoking oregano and not weed, blah blah blah blah.
When do we get around to being a model franchise that focuses on one mission?
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
You're confusing the fanbase with the franchise.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
he confuses a lot of things
a few examples
1. common sense with Blou’s blurred vision
2. stats/facts with Blous inability to read stats/facts
3. Steroids with Weed
4. he forgets that it is ok to psot during a winning streak, instead of only post when we are losing
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
this isn't pittsburgh.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
In all honesty Blou would would bitch about that team
once it lost 2 in a row.
(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions
he would bitch if he won the Lotto
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I'm pissed off after games like today, too
but the rants and raves of a “pathetic, flawed” team after them is getting a little ridiculous. We all know that today was a tough game, I just don’t see the point in getting everybody all riled up like you do.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
by ambrosiadreams on Aug 2, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
It's the one thing he's good at....
don’t take it away from him.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions
I mean, damn it
7-3 in our last 10. And aren’t we something like the second best team since the all-star break? Today we lost a tough guy (with 3 starters out, might I add). Jesus, it’s so ridiculous how all of a sudden we are a pathetic franchise again.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
by ambrosiadreams on Aug 2, 2009 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Success is measured by numbers &
and BLou expects 162-0 or it’s a failure. Of course 162-0 will only be the start. They better go 11-0 in the playoffs also.

The sun will shine in '69
and 38-0 in spring training
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
by jesus christos on Aug 2, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Since being a Cubs fan makes you so miserable why do you persist?
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 3, 2009 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions
No! Stay...it makes the winning streaks more enjoyable when we realized he's not posting this stupid shit.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh Blue you just got

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions
youre going a little picture-happy, huh
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
by jesus christos on Aug 3, 2009 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions
At least it wasn't another
Gregg stinks post.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Those are great
“Heilmann needs to close!”
“Ryan needs to be our closer now”
“Package Fox, Miles, and Heilmann for K-Rod”
I love the craziness!
The sun will shine in '69
Bad bullpens also eventually lead to over use of starters.
With the talk of Prior’s release these past few days, remember how bad or 2003 bullpen was??? Did anyone really want the ball in the hands in Joe Borowksi or Kyle Farnsworth, with the game on the line in August, September and in the playoffs. I know i didn’t. I even remember the clinching game 5 win vs Braves when Dusty pinch hit for Wood in the top of the 9th and we were screaming that Borowski was in there.
With this anemic up and down offense combined with a mediocre bullpen at best, we are in for a lot more close games. Which means leaning heavily on our starters. I think its awful hard to be a serious contender when at best your bullpen is a little above average, your defense is average to below average at worst, your offense is not fundamentally sound—twice we had runners at 3rd with one out once with D-Lee and once with Fox and both times could not get them in. All that is awfully hard to over come when comparing to the elite teams in NL. Our starting pitching is above average – great but it is by no means elite compared to other great teams, and I fear they will be heavily leaned up these next two months.
Just some of my observations...
There’s no denying it… St. Louis is really good. Better offense than the Cubs and better pitching in my opinion, especially in the playoffs
I would much prefer Carpenter/Wainwright to any two of the Cubs starters
Franklin’s had a good year this year
The Cubs are still 2 up in the loss column. However, I truly believe if they get in the playoffs again, they’ll get spanked out again.
I want the cubs to figure things out and go on a magical run just as much as anyone else.
But the more you look at it objectively, you have to at least admit how hard it is going to be with the talent of our team and how it has performed with 59 games left. And it is not like we have randy johnson and curt schilling as two starters we can ride. The giants and Cardinals if they get in they could beat the dodgers or phillies with Cain and Lincecum or Carpenter and Wainwright. Hell Pinerio is pitching better than anyone on our staff these past few weeks. Even if Zambrano gets on fire and that is a big IF. Harden cannot go deep in games. Dempster with all his walks do you really trust him. You basically are going to have to outslug a lot of teams that have better pitching than us. We have average to below average defense. That is not a good recipe to win. That being said there is still a long way to go and you never know what is going to happen. It is baseball and we know how random and cruel this game can be.
by MandMexpress12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions
What's wrong with our defense?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Well you look at soriano, its always an adevnture. Milton has the outs wrong 30% of the time.
Theriot, Fontenot, and Baker are average at best. D-Lee is exceptional. and Kosuke and Aramis are above average
by MandMexpress12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions
and thats the nice way of putting it.
compare 2nd base and SS stop to contenders. Orlando Hudson, and Furcal. Utley and Rollins. Ryan is quietly becoming a fantastic short stop defensively and I believe hitting over 300. Obviously that is not the Be all End All. but when your behind in a lot of the major categories. not just defense but bullpen and situational hitting its awfully awfully tough. Not impossible but tough.
by MandMexpress12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions
you cannot possibly be serious...
“Ryan is quietly becoming a fantastic short stop defensively…”
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions
actually ya Ryan I am getting names mixed up but Have you seen him lately? He is better than Theriot.
by MandMexpress12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions
who isn't?
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions
that's not quite fair...fontenot hasn't played SS yet....
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions
heh...I thought you were referring to Theriot.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 2, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Can we just trade
for their pitching coach, Duncan? That may be a better acquisition than trying to acquire more bullpen or rotation help :P
"Respect" ~ Ryne Sandberg
Thats what makes it tough
You have Nathan, Mariano, and Papplebon, the rest will blow 5 to 7 games a year.
All you can do is give the ball to these guys and hope they get it done.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
No
You forgot about the cure all amazing closer Kerry Wood.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Even Rivera blew game 7 of the World Series
I still think he’s the greatest closer of all time though.
He help win four
He was the 8th inning guy for the Yanks first WS win
(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions
ohhh blou
You’re so entertaining.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:18 PM CDT reply actions
Who else heard Brenly after the game?
I believe he said “Devastating loss, not only did they lose, but now the closer talk will begin” or something along those lines.
i did
he was clearly upset. the more i think about it, if lou leaves after this year and the organization doesnt believe ryno is ready to take over, i want brenly in the dugout. i never did before but he clearly knows whats going on and could help, maybe, put us over the top.
As illustrated here
many posts about how bad Gregg is in the last two days. Gregg righted himself earlier in the year, I hope he can again. He is not lights out, he is basically an adequate closer, but if he washes out, who do they have to step up and be the closer?
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 3, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Ok this is an oxymoron
but really don’t respond to this stuff.
That is my one and only response.
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
Doggie Stalker

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions
If We Waited For A Perfect Team To Root For
We’d never be a fan. All teams are flawed in some way, obviously some more than others.
If a team is contention, fans hang in there because the only thing that matters at the end of the day is having enough wins to make the playoff. Maybe it’s 83 or maybe it’s 93. Doesn’t matter. Because once you’re in the crap shoot any thing can happen.
Blown Saves Happen
Get over it.
In case no one has been paying attention, the cubs have been playing pretty good ball since the break with a broken team. If the team gets healthy then great, if they don’t then plenty will just use it as a crutch. Same way those looking for complaints will yell about the closer. There’s always something to pitch a fit about.
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
Let's try a visualization exercise, shall we BLou?
Fast forward a few months to October where the Cubs have just won the World Series. Imagine how happy you will feel. And then, assuming you would want to share some of your happy thoughts with us, visualize what some of those happy thoughts would be.
Now back up a little to the NLCS and repeat the process. The Cubs have just won the NLCS and while you’re not as happy as you’re gonna be in a few weeks, you’re still feeling pretty good. Visualize what those thoughts would be.
Back up a little more to the NLDS. Yada, yada, yada.
Then back up to the Central Division clinching game and yada some more.
Where am I going with all this? Well, you say you WANT TO WIN, period. Well in order to win that last game, you have to win quite a few before then. And guess what – one of those wins is going to be our next one or it will never happen. So when that next win occurs, why don’t you take the time to share with us some of your happy thoughts about that victory. Show us you’re human.
Or are you just going to be a foul curmudgeon the rest of your life until and unless the Cubs win the very last game of a season.
btw – I spelled ‘curmudgeon’ right the very first try. AND used it in a sentence…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Blou, you're such a curmudgeon...

"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 2, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Now which one is Worf and which one is Blue Lou?

I can never remember.
(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 2:10 AM CDT up reply actions
I love those guys!
But if that’s BLou next to me, I’m pitching him off the balcony.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
by Worf on Aug 3, 2009 6:49 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
LMAO
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Here we go again...
Firstly, why should I “kindly” comment on this post when you never offer to “kindly” post on stuff you don’t agree with?
Secondly, you say we can’t beat the marlins, yet, we have a WINNING record against them this year! 4-3 genius
thirdly, our bp has been beat up lately, don’t be so harsh on them. Actually, we have the second lowest bullpen ERA in our division…sure we issue alot of walks, but give up few hits.
Go away, you are nothing but a troll, seriously. You come out only to say I told you so, even when you are talking pyscho-babble…Isn’t that what a troll is? You may be a fan, I’m not contesting that, but I am saying you are a troll, a regular troll
by bilbosbuttons on Aug 2, 2009 10:49 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Look at all the fun people have replying to you B.
…If you didn’t exist, it would be necessary for BCB to create you!
Bluekoolaide
In regards to this post

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 2:21 AM CDT up reply actions
The problem, BLou, is that
you always seem to pop up when the Cubs lose, but never when they win. Why is that? And why do you never have anything good to say about them? Even the worst teams have some positive aspects, or do something right here and there.
Then again, you’re not alone in any of this. You’re just the most upfront about it. So kudos for that, I guess.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 2, 2009 11:31 PM CDT reply actions
Oh Blou, you're so...
predictable.
"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies." - Mike Royko
As predictable as a Kevin Gregg fastball getting whacked over a wall
Or a Carlos Marmol slider hitting a guy in the thigh.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
.
Nope
More predictable than that.
"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies." - Mike Royko
You mean
as predictable as that.
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
by Gibbon Jockey on Aug 3, 2009 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't even bother anymore BLou
No one on this board can face the fact that this 09 team is not winning the world series, which in fact is the goal for a team like this that hasn’t won the World Series in 101 years. Many here would be content with 3 straight division championships in one of baseball’s worst divisions. The reality is this team won’t have a chance at building a world series challenger until this ownership situation is resolved and the horrible contracts that Hendry has given out expire.
The way this year’s team is built strikes no fear into anyone. A poor lineup that is only solid in the 3 and 4 holes with Lee and Ramirez. Soriano only shows up every month and a half for a 2 week tear. Bradley isn’t even worth commenting on at this point for how pathetic he has been. The starting staff is about the only positive to be found with the team at this point and if anyone else wants to say how great the offense has been in the 2nd half just look at the horrid starters we have faced along the lines of Russ Ortiz, Mike Hampton, Washington Nationals No-names, etc. The bullpen is in shambles with no reliable options and a closer with sub par stuff who strikes fear into no one.
This team will win when the front office is stacked with competent members who actually know what the hell they are doing rather than throwing money at whatever name is available on the market. Until then I’m perfectly fine waiting for that day to come
Lets Go Hawks!
Wow, you do a great BLou impersonation!
Congratulations! Excellent spoof.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 3, 2009 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions
spoof?
If you don’t see that he got more right than wrong then i’m not sure what to say….
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
by Gibbon Jockey on Aug 3, 2009 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Great!
Don’t say anything! Even better!
by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 3, 2009 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions
How about instead of your typical response of just dismissing anything negative involving
this team, you actually point out what you disagree about my argument. I know its tough for you but I’d love to see what you think for a change
Lets Go Hawks!
yup
I remember, 100 years ago, Derrek Lee said “we gotta do this again!”
o.0
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions
He has
remarkable skin for someone his age. And, according to ESPN, a very nice high butt. (I’m not making that last one up… it was on Baseball Tonight the other day.)
Yes, hmlee
I saw that too. Dod you know Orlando Hudson has a nice face? That segment was… interesting.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Emeilie would agree with this statement.
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
Reasons I am crapping on the messenger:
1) The messenger ironically misuses the expression sour grapes in the title. Sour grapes would be if you came up with some false rationalization for why you didn’t want the Cubs to do well against good teams even though you actually did. In reality, you say you want the Cubs to do well against good teams when you actually want the opposite, because…
2) The messenger would rather be right than win. You come on here and crow “I told you so” whenever one of your doom and gloom predictions is even partially true but keep mum the rest of the time, conveniently ignoring anything that proves you wrong and sulking away from arguments when the tide inevitably shifts against you. Admitting you are wrong even ONCE would buy you a lot of goodwill and credibility.
3) The messenger expects to be taken seriously when he says things like “Donuts Hendry” (because he’s fat!!!) or “Geovany Soto thought he was smoking oregano and not weed, blah blah blah blah (because he smokes pot! AND he’s fat!!!).” Ad hominem attacks and strawmen do not strengthen your position. In fact, they effectively tell your position to pound sand up its ass.
3) The messenger boldly declares that to disagree with what he says is equivalent to shooting the messenger because it is GOD’S OWN TRUTH PASSED TO HIM FROM THE PROPHET KENNY WILLIAMS HIMSELF. Have you ever once admitted that there may be more than one way of looking at things? That your opinion is just that, one man’s opinion and not incontrovertible fact?
4) Because this is Bleed Cubbie Blue. This isn’t the Bucs Dugout, and self-absorbed, messianic posts like this won’t cut it here.
So here’s the big fat crap you asked for. You’ve earned it.
by redward on Aug 3, 2009 2:13 AM CDT reply actions 22 recs
Rec this hypocracy?
How do you rec some that accuses another of “Ad hominem attacks and strawmen” that openly attacks the messenger and refuse to address his point.
Your issues with blou are well documented but endorsing the same tactics of blou against blou will just make you just as self rightous and annoying as he is.
(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Aug 3, 2009 3:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Which point shall I address?
The Cubs remain a deeply flawed and mess of a team.
I think this is easily debatable. The Cubs are flawed, yes. But they have also been plagued, and I mean plagued by injuries and have still managed to stay within half a game of first place.
Donuts Hendry pulled off a nice move in getting Grabow and Gorzy
It is entirely possible that Jim Hendry eats donuts. I concede this point.
I’m still not at all sold on this lineup or this defense or this bullpen getting it’s act together to pull of making the playoffs in 2009.
I have never once seen the messenger change his mind when presented with any evidence or argument, no matter how well-reasoned. I pass.
But kindly prove how I am wrong about this team’s ability to perform well against the good competition of the NL.
I daresay the goalposts will shift on this one, but here you go: We’re 4 – 3 vs. the Marlins, which the messenger has explicitly included among the otherwise undefined list of “good competition” in the NL.
See:
Yes, even the Florida Marlins fall into that category in the extremely watered down National League. Cubs can’t beat the friggin Marlins for crying out loud.
I disagree. So do numbers. These numbers must be delusional.
Maybe if there had been something worth addressing, I would have done so in the first place.
Excellent!!
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
BRAVO!!!
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 3, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Very well said
Sadly, Blou won’t respond to this, because, well, as you pointed out, he “sulk[s] away from arguments when the tide inevitably shifts against you.”
"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies." - Mike Royko
ok, i'll bite - here's some reasons why im still relatively optimistic
Cubs starters are 4th in the NL in ERA
. . . . and 4th in BAA
. . . . and 4th in OBP against
. . . . and 5th in WHIP
Cubs relievers are 2nd in the NL in BAA
Cubs hitters are 6th in the NL in SLG
. . . and 7th in OPS
Cubs are 43% to make the playoffs, which is the 5th highest percentage.
the Cubs are a decent, but not great, team in a season full of decent, but not great, teams.
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
Selective Stats
can be very deceiving.
Here are some more NL rankings:
Cubs hitters are dead last BA with runners in scoring position
14th in RBI with runners in scoring position
14th in total hits
10th in OBP
9th in runs scored
Dead Last in SB%
Pitching: 15th in BB allowed
13th in % Of Save Opportunities Converted
12th in HRs allowed
13th in errors committed
14th in Fielding %
sure i was selective
but it was really dumb of you to start off saying stats can be deceiving, then cite the Cubs rank in BA with RISP. that is a ridiculous stat
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
Okay
Try this then: Cubs are 5th from the bottom in WPA at -4.83. Doesn’t matter how you measure it, the Cubs are really bad in offensive game situations.
7th from the top in WPA in July.
it seems like the bats are coming around.
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
agree with that
Cubs are 7 games over .500 and on pace for 86 or 87 wins, which is significantly more than the 79-83 wins recently predicted by Blou, which is what I’m refuting and you seem to be defending.
so yeah, i agree with your Parcells quote
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
that's right
tied for first. One percentage point ahead of the Cardinals, actually, and still two up in the loss column.
We control our own destiny.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions
All we have to do now is win out and the division is ours.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Aug 3, 2009 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions
BLou, you must have the thickest skin of anybody in Chicago.
I’m sure you realize that when you challenge people’s belief systems they’ll tear into you with tooth and nail. You look at the Cubs dispassionately; most of the rest of the posters here look upon them religiously. All true believers, whether they believe in god or the Cubs, essentially say, “I don’t have to argue the point with you – I have faith.” Yet they argue the point more than anybody else. Richard Feynman said, “The first principal is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.” Most fans want to fool themselves into thinking the Cubs can win. And the Cubs just might win one of these days! But the essence of fandom is that delicious self-delusion.
When you come in with your analytical viewpoints, real Cubs fans turn vicious. I, for one, like your analyses. They ground me. They remind me not to get swept up in the religion.
But, come on, admit it: you like being the villain who shows the congregation that the world is not flat! And you like the almost hysterical response. You’re a button-pusher as well as a dispassionate analyst.
Joe, you coulda made us proud!
by copingwiththecubs on Aug 3, 2009 5:34 AM CDT reply actions
You look at the Cubs dispassionately
Uh, no, he doesn’t. He looks for reasons to complain about them.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Blous listening to the Cubs game
THe Cubs line up is brought to you by TUMS
1. Slumpy – CF
2. Slumpy – SS
3. Slumpy – 1B
4. Slumpy – 3B
5. Slumpy – FR
6. Slumpy – RF
7. Slumpy – 2B
8. Slumpy – C
9. Slumpy – P
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
oh
you want first names too?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Let's be frank, who would be more accurate and dispassionate in their worldview?
Someone who dreams the Cubs will win or someone who sees a million reasons to complain about them every day?
Joe, you coulda made us proud!
by copingwiththecubs on Aug 3, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I don
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't wanna be frank. I like being Drew.
This team has its flaws. Every team does. That doesn’t mean that they can’t win more games and make a play for the post.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
exactly
there is a different between “we have holes” and “we suck harder than a cheap hooker”
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Gregg has been pitching well lately, he had a bad night.
I wouldn’t over react to it. The bullpen has a couple of questionable pitchers but overall it’s decent. The problem is the BBs in general but otherwise I think the bullpen has improved as the season has progressed.
Now, in the playoffs with 100+ years of pressure to close out it will be interesting to see whether this bullpen can throw strikes. I hope that they do.
The Cubs complained somewhat about what they considered to be tasteless promotions y the marlins in this series. But for an organization where players and managers comment publicly on the pressure, I think the Marlins’ tasteless acts could be a good mental primer for the playoffs for the Cubs.
I still expect this team to win the NLCD, but we’ll wait and see whether they can win in the playoffs.
where were those complaining about Gregg
when he was 221/24 three days ago? He had two bad innings, should we bench Lee for two bad innings?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I'm sure this has been addressed elsewhere
But his two bad outings (recently, at least) were both against his former team. Isn’t there a chance they just know his weaknesses and how to jump on them?
good point
plus it was hot and humid
and i meant 21 of 24, if he converted 221 of 24 that would be amazing, and i am sure Blou would still find the negative
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I didn't even bother
reading the 10 dozen above posts, so forgive me if I parrot what you said.
We’re probably not as good as the Dodgers or Phillies. We’re very close with St. Louis. The next extended injury may decide the division. But I’m thankful Hendry didn’t go all St. Louis and trade off three of our best prospects. For the first time since Dallas Green was here, the Cubs are making wise decisions. If we finish in fourth in the division, most of us will be back next year (as in, regulars on BCB). We finally have a dozen or more players in the pipeline with a legitimate chance at being good. I will be intrigued to see where Baseball America (and the rest of the experts) rate us. Could well be first or second in the division, which would be a massive upgrade.
St. Louis may win the division in 2009. It might be more important to them, with Pujols impending free agency. But I am having as much fun following Starlin Castro, Hak-Ju Lee, Josh Vitters, and the rest of the kids as the big leaguers.
And if St. Louis wins the division, even by five or more games, I will be looking forward to 2010. Whether ‘the year’ happens soon or not, if we continue to draft well, we’ll be fine.
So, suddenly Hungry Jim is gonna start running a productive farm system?
You’re thinking he had a brain transplant recently?
Joe, you coulda made us proud!
by copingwiththecubs on Aug 3, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah, because
Fox, Riot, Marshall, Marmol, Wells, Soto, Fuld, Guzman, etc haven’t been productive…
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Koyie Hill
how can you forget him. He has only caught the past 23(?) games without a game off. Has anyone in MLB has done that this season besides him?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
He's not a product of the Cubs farm system.
But Koyie does deserve mad props. (And I can’t believe I just used the term “mad props.”)
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I can't believe
you used it either. Word to mah peeps.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Joe Mauer
Caught 27 games in a row, May 26th to June 26th.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions
ok, you win :=)
come on Koyie, surpass 27
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
You forgot Z
He will not be happy
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 3, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
GOOD NEWS!
I just heard on the Score that the Cubs have only 19 of the remaining 59 games against teams with winning records. That would be good news for any team, but with the Cubs battling for the NL Central that’s great news!
"People shouldn’t bust your chops just because you’re a Sox fan on a Cub board — but I know it happens. FWIW, I think sites like this are more interesting when fans of other teams join in the conversation." by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009
Those 19 games are...
… 4 with Colorado, 3 with Philadelphia, 4 with Los Angeles, 3 with St. Louis, 4 with San Francisco, 1 with the White Sox.
Of course, if the Brewers go back over .500, add seven to that total.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
It's certainly doable
The Cubs bash the teams they are supposed to win against. Which is what you want. If that pattern continues then:
IF the Cubs merely win 1 of 3 against the over .500:
6-13
IF the Cubs win 2 of 3 against the under .500:
27-13
That gives the Cubs 88 wins for the season. Does that win the NL Central though? Probably, right?
"People shouldn’t bust your chops just because you’re a Sox fan on a Cub board — but I know it happens. FWIW, I think sites like this are more interesting when fans of other teams join in the conversation." by Shanghai Badger on Mar 13, 2009
I think the WC has a good chance to come out of the NL Central.
The Rockies and Giants have to play each other 11 times. The Cubs and Cardinals only play each other 3 times. I think it’s likely the Rockies and Giants come close to splitting those games and that is what gives the Central a good chance to win the wild card.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Aug 3, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Possibly correct
It’s still too early to call which division has a best shot at the WC. That’s just my take on it.
And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.
But
the Rockies play the Cubs and the Cardinals 7 times and the Rox have gone 38-15 in the past two months. I think that trumps the above.
The Rockies play the Cubs four times, not seven.
The series vs. the Rox @ Wrigley was in April.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
"Of course, if the Brewers go back over .500, add seven to that total."
This is why I think saying “The Cubs play X games against teams who are above .500” is a bit deceptive. Let’s break it down further: games against good teams (more than 5 games above .500), mediocre teams (+/- 5 games of .500) and bad teams (more than 5 games below .500).
Here’s how the rest of the schedule looks:
Games against teams more than 5 games above .500:
Cubs 18 (3 home, 15 away)
Cardinals 9 (3 home, 6 away)
Games against teams +/- 5 games of .500:
Cubs 17 (12 home, 6 away)
Cardinals 23 (15 home, 8 away)
Games against teams more than 5 games below .500:
Cubs 24 (15 home, 9 away)
Cardinals 22 (9 home, 13 away)
FWIW
This is how I would project expected results from this remaining schedule:
games against >5 games over teams:
Cubs 6-12
Cardinals 3-6
games against +/- 5 games of .500 teams
Cubs 9-8
Cardinals 12-11
games against > 5 games under teams
Cubs 18-6
Cardinals 15-7
Final Record: Cubs and Cardinals both 88-74 to finish in a TIE.
Start your deep breathing exercises now, folks.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
and we play the tie breaker in
MILWAUKEE
( Z pitching).
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 3, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
on extended rest
He can throw a fastball at 87MPH and make you look like a fool. He can spray lines drives to right field. He can put up with crappy offense and take the loss. He is Randy Wells. He is the most interesting pitcher in the world. Stay healthy, my friends.
by jesus christos on Aug 3, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions
The only way
Z gets extended rest in the heat of a down to the wire pennant race is if he is injured or suspended.
or
we score (gasp give up) 8+ thru 5
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Um this is joke reference to the Z no hitter last year
In MILWAUKEE against the Astros in which he did indeed pitch on extended rest.
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 3, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Hard to tell from the reply
PS you were the one who only realized Obama was a White Sox fan two weeks before the election
( I get to needle azjazzman as we are the only known posters on both a baseball and silent movie buff
blog).
"I daydream just like everybody else, I just do it with my body facing the field, so everybody thinks I'm paying attention."- Greg Maddux
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 3, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually
I think it was after the election, and only then because he came to speak a couple of blocks from my house during spring training and the Cubs invited him to visit Hohokam and he declined.
Well, the Cubs don't play in "Cominsky Field"
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
And Cubs fans don't drink white wine at Wrigley.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Does anyone wanna make a bet...
that BLou is actually either:
1) Al posting under a false ID, just to raise post counts.
Problem with theory: Al couldn’t post half the garabage that BLou does without throwing up everyday; so Al have you lost weight?
2) Worf is BLou
Problem with theory: I can’t come up with one. Has anyone seen BLou and Work together?
Things that make you go mmmmmm?
The sun will shine in '69
I didn't think of that!
Can’t be Worf then, how about SWL? Anyone seem those two together before?
The sun will shine in '69
That's a real insult
to SWL. He cheers for his team. BM doesn’t do that.
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
by sue369 on Aug 3, 2009 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
SWL is funny and entertaining
and I do not think ANYONE else is quite the sour puss BLou is
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Krummy?
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
ERIC HANNA IS A GOD
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
the next time someone asks you if you're ERIC HANNA
you say YES!
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
and proclaim that we must make a trade
all the while shouting since that would be the beloved caps lock
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I AM ERIC HANNA!
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I AM ERIC HANNA!
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
TO THE LINK POST FINDER THINGAMABOB!
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2009/6/30/931029/cubs-need-to-make-a-trade
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
GETIT D ON EJIM!
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions
I AM ERIC LIND
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I AM ERIC HANNA@
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 3, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
crud
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 3, 2009 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions
I wonder whether ERIC is on Twitter.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
GOTTA GO POOP NOW!
LOOK A BIRD!
JEWEL NEEDS TO START STOCKING CORONA IN CASES, GETITDONEJIM!
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 4, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions
I'M EATING A TACO!
MY BIG BROTHER IS AN IDIOT!
SIX HOURS OF XBOX, A SNACK AND THEN ITS BEDTIME!
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
BCB POSTERS ARE MEAN!
THEY DONT NO GOOD TRADE IDEAS!
MILTON BRADLEY SUCKS
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions
Ok, there's no picture there
It was supposed to be “!!1”
I have no idea what happened, but that wasn’t a graphic photo or anything . . .
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions
TRADE SHANGHAI
FOR SOMEONE WHOCAN POSTAPIC GETIT DON EJIM!
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 4, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, I've seen that happen before.
Not sure what the deal is – I’m sure some technogeek can explain. (Oooh, sorry, I mean “technology expert.”)
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
has Mr. Don't Question My Resume
been around lately?
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
If they lose tonight
I expect a post from him telling us how foolish we all are.
Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT
BLOU cares about one thing...Cubs winning a World Series
The big majority of BCB posters care about one thing too….living in abject denial about the 2009 Cubs
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
Abject denial??
All right, I can’t take it any more. Whatever happened to sticking with your team till the bitter end? Yeah, maybe we don’t make the playoffs this year, but maybe we do. I, for one, plan to watch or listen to every game the rest of this season, and pull for them all the way. I choose to remain positive, even when the chips are down. I’m not ignoring the stats that are posted here or anything like that. BLou, you and I want the same thing in the end, we just approach it differently.
3rd Person Reference proves...
You suck at life.
"This is an environment of welcoming, and you should just get the hell outta here." --Michael Scott
BLOU cares
about being right. And respected. If only BLOU deserved either.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions
BLou cares about stats and facts
as long as they are made up by him, those that prove him wrong are not actual stats or facts, and they are part of the 2009 denial
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
can we be in denial in 2010 also
or will we still be in denial about 2009?
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
I found blou...pic revealed!!
Look at the name on the outfit…
Warning: a little gross
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e298/davidjt/BlouBulsupporter.jpg
by bilbosbuttons on Aug 3, 2009 8:35 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
I honestly
think you’d be happier if the Cardinals won the World Series.
-You deeply respect the players, manager, and system of the Cardinals
-You have no respect for the players, GM, playing style, or minor league system of the Chicago Cubs.
-You seem happy when the Cardinals do well, and happy when the Cubs lose. You are never present when the Cubs win, so I can’t comment on your mood when the Cubs win.
-You, as you have numerous times told us, work in St Louis
So why not just switch hats and be a Cardinals fan? I know it’s trite to say to be a fan of another team if you complain about yours, but you are an extreme case. You have such a reverential view of the Cardinals, and find the Cubs so dispicable, why not just switch?
I was a Cowboys fan growing up in Arizona (this was pre-Cardinals, and everyone there was a Cowboys fan), then moved to Chicago in high school. I became so embarrassed by the character of the team in the 90s, and was surrounded by so many Bears fans, that I slowly just morphed into a Bears fan and dropped the Cowboys. And I was much happier after. I don’t see any reason to be to torture yourself “rooting” for a team for which you have no respect, on or off the field, particularly when there is a team for which you hold such esteem.
DEJESUS!!!
I love the Cubs but...
I have to admit that anybody who “deeply respects(s) the players, manager and system of the Cardinals,” and “(has) no respect for the players, GM, playing style or minor league system of the Chicago Cubs,” is a fairly astute observer of baseball.
I don’t know why I’m defending BLou. I guess I’ve always hated seeing someone get ganged up on.
Joe, you coulda made us proud!
by copingwiththecubs on Aug 3, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions
having no respect
for the players on the Cubs makes you an astute observer of baseball?
Maybe you should stop defending BLOU and start defending yourself.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions
BLou WANTS
to be ganged up on. He even expected it in the post. I don’t feel bad about him getting routed when that’s exactly what he wants. One reason my comments have been held to a minimum here.
While it would be hard to root for the Cubs AND the Cards
I do root for the Red Sox because I deeply respect their system and proved that talent triumphs all. That’s not to say I think the Cubs don’t have talent; they do, but they’ll need some help getting to the postseason.
Yawn
Wake me up when you actually have something new to say. In many ways I agree with your points but I am tired of the same whiny posts over and over and over again under NIU, Blue Mike, Blue Lou, Blue Hoo or whatever new name you create for yourself.
If you hate the Cubs that much, I have a suggestion…….Turn off the TV. Why do you watch them when you already know the outcome and dislike the team so much?
by rlpete on Aug 3, 2009 9:37 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
If you can look past who posted, and who responded
There are facts in the post that I think are important. Here, they were expressed as the records against good teams vs. bad teams. Another way to look at it is our ability to compete to make the playoffs vs. the ability to compete in the playoffs.
As much as it pains me to say this, this is exactly what Kenny Williams saw and decided to act on. The PV move reduces the WS chances of making the post season, while at the same time increases their chances of winning in the post season.
I wish we had some of that vision, and why the records against good/bad teams are predictive. There will be only good teams in the playoffs.
The playoffs are a crapshoot, IMO.
Last year, the Cubs were 17-13 against the other NL teams that made the playoffs (and 5-2 versus LA). For comparisons sake, Philadelphia was 13-8.
Just because you can beat the other teams that make the playoffs doesn’t guarantee you success in the playoffs. Whomever gets hot during the playoffs, wins, period. It doesn’t matter who was good going in.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Bill Potter on Aug 3, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.
In the 2005 regular season, the White Sox were 6-10 vs. the Angels and Red Sox.
They went 7-1 against them in the postseason.
I could look for more examples, but you get the idea.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Just get there, that's my only request.
Frankly, I don’t care if it’s an 83-win Cubs team that makes the playoffs. As long as they’re in, they are one of 8 teams with a chance to win the whole thing (obviously).
We’ve seen the Cubs play three good weeks of baseball this season, and that’s all it really takes come October, regardless of record.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
The 2005
White Sox were excellent all year long in winning close games, going 35-19 during the regular season in 1 run games. They continued that in the playoffs, going 7-1 in games decided by one or two runs.
That is the story of the run by the White Sox in 2005.
you can always find the exceptions,
and yes there are no guarantees. Records against the better teams and better pitchers are good barameters. But, the bigger point is if even we make the post season, will it matter.
Why do you think Hendry was interested in PV in the off season? He knew that while starting pitching was a relative strength, and good enough to make the playoffs, we have no true Ace, and no one who stacks up against other playoff Aces’s.
They're barometers, but matter very little.
In this decade, the World Series champion has had a winning record against the postseason teams in their league 4 of 9 seasons, so it matters very little, I think.
Yes, having an “ace” is great, but not necessary. That pitcher will start 1-2 games more than likely in a series, and what happens if he gets a no-decision or loses the game? Then he’s been burned and the team is back to “average” pitchers.
Would Jake Peavy have helped the Cubs? Probably. But was he the difference between flaming out in the playoffs and winning the World Series? No.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Bill Potter on Aug 3, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I just wish you'd change the "thou" to "though" in the Fanpost title.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Then he'd have to change his user name to "BLough"
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
not
Bleaux
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
though doth protest too much
Cubs will win 79 to 83 games. Season has been over for weeks. St. Louis will eventually run away with this division. And you can print it. BLou (7/21/09)
have it
thygh way.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
ah sea watt ewe ded thair
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 3, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions
eye two sea wattcha ded their
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Mambeaux Chicken
Wasn’t that BLou also?
"The more i practice, the luckier i seem to get" -Yogi Berra
No, I am Mambochicken.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
by daver on Aug 3, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
No, I am Mambochicken.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
This was...
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
No, I am Mambochicken.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 3, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
...exactly what I was hoping for.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Only comment I'll make is this
If the Cubs can beat the teams they are supposed to beat, and be passable against the rest, their chances are fine. I’m certainly no where near the pre-season prediction of the Cards/Brewers being close, but the Cubs clearly winning, as it’s a wide open ballgame. But I still like our chances, although I think we’ll have to win the division to get in.
what is good about this team?
they have showed glimpses of flawlessness in the starting rotation, the batting order, and the bullpen. yes they lost yesterday on back to back homers in the 9th, but what did we do bad except for Gregg’s 2 pitches? if you want to say “well a loss is a loss it doesn’t matter”, well then a win is a win, and who cares that Marmol just about lost tonight. I don’t see how you can say there is nothing good about this team and that we have no chance, when we have one of the best starting rotations in not only the National League, but baseball. We have averaged the most runs since the All-Star Break than any team in the NL, and we have gotten quality start after quality start…yes that is 11 out of the last 13 games(excluding Zambrano getting hurt) if you are counting…it is sad that you keep hating on the Cubs when they have the best record in the National League since the ASB, yes 13 and 5.
Well
I don’t see what’s wrong with what BLou’s saying. I’ve already been labelled as a “BLou follower” or whatever in another thread but that couldn’t be farther from the truth.
I’ll be honest, I felt a terribly bitter taste in my mouth after we failed to win Sunday’s game against a sub-par National League team, especially with it being Kevin Gregg’s second blown save in a row against said team.
I’ve been a diehard Cubs fan since 1996, and yes, I’m of a younger demographic around here. With that established, I’ve gotten to the point with this team where all I want to do is win, at any cost. And if we’re going to suck it up against a team like the Marlins, how confident should I feel? I want this team to win, and I don’t create excuses or give anyone who doesn’t deserve it a pass (I’ll give a guy like Ted Lilly a pass on a bad start, because he’s been so good all year, but I’ll never make excuses for Soriano, Bradley, or Zambrano because they haven’t proven to me they’re out there for the team).
And yes, that means I’m going to be critical. I think Jim Hendry’s a moron for the moves he made this offseason and was criticizing this team as soon as he let Jim Edmonds walk. This team was pimped by the organization as better than last year but I have NOT ONCE this season seen any kind of shade of 2008 brilliance. And because of that, people make excuses. It’s Lou’s fault, “It’s just another one of Soriano’s slumps,” “Bradley’s getting there.” Well, how many more times does Lou have to change the lineup before it ISN’T his fault? Soriano has one good homestand and suddenly he’s a hero again? I surely haven’t seen any sign of Bradley “getting there” no matter what anyone says.
This team has been subpar at best, and yes I will admit, I was very happy seeing the Cubs play so well on their last homestand and last night against Cinci. But our first challenge since the ASB was Florida and we couldn’t handle them. Ultimately, it’s the guys who go out onto the field night after night, getting paid to do a job they haven’t gotten done the majority of the year. And I’ve been saying since May that this team didn’t have what it takes, a statement I still stand behind. The bullpen’s atrocious, we still have nagging injuries that leave massive holes on the roster, and nobody outside of Ramirez and Lee have shown signs of consistency offensively.
I want them to turn it around and prove me wrong. SO badly. Ultimately I just want this team to win. But if I want to see the team win, I won’t make excuses for them. To me, baseball is very black and white and either you get the job done, or you don’t. And there will be rare shades of gray but they’re uncommon. I don’t get the pride in suggesting “the 2006 Cardinals weren’t that good and won the WS,” because that team never struck me as remarkable, WS or not.
In order for me as a fan to feel comfortable, the guys need to turn it around. And I will continue to defend Lou Piniella because since 2007 he’s shown me he’s awake and will do what’s best for this team, despite the occasionally screw-up that every manager makes. I won’t make excuses for Geovany Soto because he’s proven to me that he didn’t care about capitalizing off last season by wasting away his offseason. I will continue to dog Soriano and Bradley until I see consistency from them.
Diff’rent strokes for diff’rent folks. All I know is I expect the best out of my team, and win or lose I’ll always root for ‘em. But I’ll also be critical of guys who just aren’t getting the job done, and there have been a lot of examples of that to me for the 2009 Cubs campaign.
Why is it that people have to trot out how long they've been a die hard fan?
Honestly, who cares. My three uncles who were part of the handful of people who taught me about the Cubs are all well in their sixties, and they’ve been fans for who knows how long, and not once have I ever heard them say, “Well, I’ve been a fan since 19xx, blargha blargha blargha words.”
This isn’t wholly directed at you, but just because you time stamp when you became a fan doesn’t make you any more right about your opinion, or in BLou’s case, it doesn’t give you the right to be a jerk.
www.facebook.com/craighudak
by Craig in South Bend on Aug 4, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions
in the vain hopes it will make whatever goofy thing they post will sound smarter
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Because it shows they've paid the cost to be the boss!
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
First of all, that wasn't the last game this year the Cubs will lose to a "sub-par" team.
It probably wasn’t the last series that they will lose to one, either. It happens to all teams. (The “first challenge” after the ASB was Philadelphia. Similar results – should have won 2 of 3 but didn’t.)
As far as Jim Edmonds goes – where is Jim playing these days? That’s right – he’s not playing. So apparently, Hendry is an idiot for not bringing him back, but what about the other 29 GMs? I think Hendry had a bad off-season, as well, but Edmonds isn’t the issue.
The issue that people have with BLou isn’t that he doesn’t have legitimate points – he does have them. However, he keeps saying them over and over again, in a near belligerent manner. His comment that people who want to be friends on a message board are pathetic is laughable, because his raison d’être is to stir the pot. He probably tells people in his real life how he “got those losers at BCB all fired up today” with pride; it shows in his posting style. I do grow tired of people who instinctively rip on everything he says because of nothing more than who is saying it, and I’ve called some people on it. By and large, though, he makes his own bed because he wants to lie in it.
We all want the Cubs to win the World Series. Could it happen this year? Certainly. The reality is that it probably won’t, but that’s not going to stop me from cheering for them.
However, if you’re pinning your hopes on this year’s team, you’re likely to be very disappointed, because they are probably at best the #3 team in the National League. I’ve felt that way for almost two months and I’ve alluded to it several times on this board, but I don’t feel the need to post it several times each week.
Finally, you’ve been a fan since 1996 – that’s great. You started out when the team was mediocre and stuck with them. I’m not making fun of you or saying that you’re not as legitmate of a fan because it’s a shorter period of time than others; all fans have to start some time. But don’t tell us about disappointment and how much you want them to win, when most of us have lived through 1984, a good percentage through 1969, and a whole lot of crap in between.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
+1
Well put Badger. I couldn’t have said it better myself.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions
soo....
he’s like reggie jackson of the late 70 yankees……
he is the straw that stirs the drink
no
Reggie Jackson was a great man, and a hero to many.
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 5, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Did he die?
Actually, Jackson was an arrogant S.O.B. when he was playing. A great player, sure. A great man? Well, I don’t think he’s a bad guy, but I’d hardly call him great.
Still, I think the board would survive if BLou learned to be a bit more flexible.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 5, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions
My 2 cents
The Cubs, as a Major League baseball franchise, haven’t won a WS title for longer than any of us have followed the team. Logic says that none of us follow this team because of all the championships.
If a fan is emotionally disturbed about this franchise, then I think one or more of the following might help to not be as emotionally disturbed in the future. You could switch to following another MLB franchise that you think will be less emotionally disturbing for you, or you could pare-down or cut-off the attention you are giving to the Cubs and not follow another MLB team.
Currently, there is only 1 of 30 teams each year that can win the WS championship. Normally, a major market team with a higher than average payroll should have a better than 1 in 30 chance of winning the championship. But never mind that, the chances are still not good enough to be waiting around for that to cure any emotional disturbances you have about the Cubs. At least mentally and preferably in reality you don’t want to be waiting.

by 


























