Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

(at bottom or article)

Levine is just speculating here, but I would not be surprised if the owners push this through to help finance the sale. I'm not a huge fan of the extracurricular jumbotron stuff but the current setup is pretty lacking in the informational stuff that would go on it.

The Club has to pay ~$30mm to the banks each year, and if the Jumbotron ads bring in 25-30 million I'd much rather see that than a slash in payroll. The scoreboard isn't going anywhere but I wouldn't be surprised if they set something up like they did for the winter classic, or put it on the buildings on Waveland behind the LF bleachers.

3 months ago Calvin_tiny berselius 230 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

A while back

Someone suggested they add a tron where one of the rooftops are. That’s not a bad idea.

I also wouldn’t be opposed to a “digital” version of the scoreboard. I know I’m in the minority of that opinion but it just doesn’t affect me.

Plus trons help the casual fan at the game get to know all the players better.

by ak123 on Aug 22, 2009 12:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

jorel1114 (8/22/2009 at 12:41 PM)
Report Violation
Yeah man blow up the stadium! And burn it down! And then pour acid on it with all the Cubs fans inside!!! YEAH! ####.

YEAH WOOOO

by jesus christos on Aug 22, 2009 12:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't have a problem with this...

… nor with a “ribbon board” like other parks have on the facade of the upper deck. Get more information out there; there’s so little available right now at Wrigley.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I hate the ribbon boards

they are really distracting and they are 90% advertising anyway

by azjazzman on Aug 22, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

At Chase Field, yes they are.

I find that place the worst bombardment of noise and advertising anywhere.

Other parks use them more for info. Granted, the Cubs would sell ads on one, but I think they’d find a better balance than many other teams do, the D’backs and White Sox being the worst offenders.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other parks I have been in that had them

Dodger Stadium, Turner Field, Coors Field, Minute Maid – also heavy advertising. In fact, one thing other parks do that they don’t do at Chase Field is to allow fans to post messages on the ribbon board. That is also not one of my favorite things.
I am pretty sure the boards are sold mainly on the basis of their advertising potential.

by azjazzman on Aug 22, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Al, we've had this discussion before...

Do you really think if you set a ribbon board in front of a marketing exec of a company looking to increase revenue, he/she would restrain themselves?

On a related note, can anyone cite examples of a ribbon board that doesn’t offend? i.e. is in good balance?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 23, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The one at Miller Park isn't too bad.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't have one...

…in Oakland, but I’ll let you know what the Giants do at AT&T as soon as the Cubs get here.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I became a Cubs fan because of Wrigley Field.

I liked that it was a time warp in just about every sense, and I especially like not having a jumbotron. I don’t want a stupid KissCam or Shuffling Hats game at Wrigley.

Yeah, I’m a traditionalist, the tradition is what makes each of my rare visits to Wrigley so amazing.

by Pat19 on Aug 22, 2009 1:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Very true.

i don’t understand baseball, after all. And between innings, nay, between mere at-bats, I need CONSTANT ENTERTAINMENT- even if it’s not entertaining at all. (yeah, I am a little bitter)

by Pat19 on Aug 22, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember that the affluent white people...

…who are going to go to a game expect “more from their game day experience.” Whatever happens on the field is lagniappe; the “atmosphere” is far more important, and they want t-shirts shot out of cannons, dot racing, and dance-offs. You’ll see this in spades at a Giants game, and it’s part of the rational behind moving the A’s to San Jose.

My first baseball game, however, ever was at Wrigley in ‘82. I’ve been a Cubs fan ever since, but I also wouldn’t mind a Jumbotron. It would have to be done right, of course, but it could help out with proper info, and a modicum of advertising. I keep wondering if they couldn’t appendage a pair of small-to-medium sized boards on the current one. Display the batters face on one, and the relevant stats on the other.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shuffling Hats game at Wrigley.

they have shuffling cups

by jesus christos on Aug 22, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and M&M races

baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by Cubbie-Tim on Aug 22, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and the Winner is - - - - -

‘Mickey Morandini’s Glove’

by slide on Aug 22, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a blast from the past.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hope you aren't planning to return to Wrigley now that they have the shuffling puck game on the electronic board below the scoreboard.

Sentimentality doesn’t win World Series. Players do. Maximizing revenue is going to allow the organization to get better players. I would like to know if a tradition of winning World Series could top the tradition of waiting in long lines just to get the opportunity to urinate into a trough with 20 strangers?

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course I still plan on returning- like I said, getting to Wrigley is a very rare treat for me.

And I agree with you- more revenue means more money to spend on the team. But at what cost? I’m not a win-at-all-costs type, personally. It isn’t necessary to ruin Wrigley IMO in order to win, even if it could help. I know I’ll be in the minority here- and I get your POV, I really do- but wins and losses aren’t everything to me.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'd rather start the wave.

Just say no. I am totally anti-jumbotron.

Not that anyone cares, but I’d like to see the current old scoreboard get rid of the AL team scores so it could show all of the NL teams.

"Fasten your seatbelts"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Aug 22, 2009 1:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No jumbtron

If there has to be one, and this would be a last resort, stick it on a rooftop. Want more info? Buy a program.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 22, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

The programs don't have the up to date info you can put on a jumbotron.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But unless they have the IPhone

They don’t have that access in front of them in the park.

by ak123 on Aug 22, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah

I didn’t realize.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that's just not true.

You don’t have to have an iPhone to connect to the internet at Wrigley.

by kanderber on Aug 23, 2009 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, really.

If everyone in the park got to see how the umps royally screwed the Cubs on a close play in the 7th inning, right at the moment when everyone is at their point of maximum inebriation, what harm could possibly come from that?

"Was you ever punched in the face five hundred times a night? It stings after a while." ~Rocky Balboa

by Goodie1969 on Aug 23, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct.

Great, but non-controversial, plays, are the ones allowed.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is "non-controversial" determined?

And who makes that determination?

"Was you ever punched in the face five hundred times a night? It stings after a while." ~Rocky Balboa

by Goodie1969 on Aug 23, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think anything...

… that’s close, that could show up an umpire, is not shown.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or even rain delay videos

Plus, the casual fan who doesn’t know about our “4th outfielder” or Jeff Baker yet can see his stats, a photo of what he looks like, and and get to know the team better.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just like I now know

Matt Kemp looks like John Legend? That’s facinating stuff on the Dodgers video board….captivating!

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the Dodgers fault

For their poor work on the video board. That’s why they’re hiring someone new to fill in that job full time.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes to a Jumbotron

Screw the drippy sentimentality for Wrigley. I’ve ben going to the park since 1977. Like so many Cub fans, I care about one friggin thing….WINNING A WORLD SERIES. To be honest, I could care less if they whore out the rest of the Wrigley.

Job one should be to go to Mayor Daley and tell him 60 night games is the deal. And if he doesn’t like it then he can go pound sand and the Cubs will start investigating building a new state of the art ballpark elsewhere.

Tear down the scoreboard, put up a Jumbotron if that will help…

Tear down the ivy, put up advertising boards if that will help…

I just don’t care anymore. Wrigley is an old smelly ballpark that is in need of extreme makeover anyway. If they can whore the place out by affixing the Captain Morgan pancake house to the exterior, then just go balls out and add a Jumbotron too.

"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)

by BLou on Aug 22, 2009 4:47 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Yes, but not THAT far

Jumbotron on a rooftop would be a great addition, but lets use it for Information and non obnoxious advertising. I dont mind how they use the pitch speed and digital scoreboard that they have now.

DO NOT TOUCH THE REST OF THE BALLPARK

keep the jumbotron outside the park and everyone is cool. I would’ve never been for this idea until I went to the winter classic and saw how it could work there. I mean its 2009 everyone. Just becasue we put a jumbo tron in doesnt mean we lose any of our tradition. we’ll all tell our kids about the non jumboron days and they wont be able to imagine such a thing.
Sooner or later though we will need the total grandstand redux project. that will be a sad day, but necessary to ensure the wrigley neighborhood tradtion continues for another hundred years.

hopefully we get a world series victory by then eh?

by meancubface on Aug 22, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fu*k Tradition

101 years and counting of losing? Being the laughingstock of major league baseball? The Luvable Loser tag???

SCREW the tradition attached to Wrigley. Its manufactured and phony to begin with and the BRILLIANT brain child of the Tribune Company marketing department who were smart enough to understand they could slap a coat of paint on Wrigley and sell the shit out of the ballpark experience.

I’ve been to countless hundreds of games at Wrigley in the last 33 years. While I like Wrigley as much as the next guy, the fact is the place is old, smelly and broken down. And in case you haven’t noticed already that ballpark has been shrewdly and methodically whored out the past 20 years already. Might as well complete the process and add a big fat Jumbotron in centerfield that can generate millions of advertising dollars AND from my perspective keep the fan informed.

You wan’t 1908 tradition??? Then take a vacation trip to Cooperstown.

"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)

by BLou on Aug 22, 2009 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, welcome back.

Why don’t you place this in a word doc and just cut and paste. This rant is so old and tired…..

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What tradition? A tradition of ineptitude and failure to win a World Series.

Why would improving the ball park and the revenue streams create a sad day? Anyone concerned with this team actually winning a championship should want them to do whatever is necessary to maximize revenue in order to field the best possible team. It’s sad that fan pressure to preserve an outdated hazard to public safety might keep all revenue streams from being maximized.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do not touch the ballpark?

You enjoy the troughs in the mens rooms and the dingy grandstand? The players would love to have modern facilities, and batting cages that they can use mid-game. Wrigley desparately needs to be renovated. The Ivy and the scoreboard are the best parts, and those aren’t going anywhere

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 22, 2009 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm fine with all of that, actually.

There are ways to modernize the ballpark and keep the traditional things as well. Plans are already drawn up, just waiting for new ownership to approve and finance.

And I hope they go ahead as fast as possible.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of old parks...

They did a great job with Fenway, and they have a Jumbotron too

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 22, 2009 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dodger Stadium also has troughs.

Why is this such a problem? Modern codes prohibit the use of such….facilities. Now, seperate urinals are needed. What this causes are even longer toilet waits at brand-new facilities.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah

that isn’t even remotely true.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 3:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will agree to disagree.

I have never stood in longer lines than at Petco Park and Soldier Field.

The point is useless to discuss since such plumbing can no lonber be used.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is useless

to discuss because it isn’t apples to apples. I have been in numerous newer parks and there are never long lines to get in the bathrooms because the have a lot more of them then you would have at a park like Wrigley.

Not just a few more, but multiple times more, which would negate any trough vs urinal difference.

That is simply a fact, and cannot be disputed.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then you haven't been to Petco Park.

The marble walls are pretty. The waits go on and on and on…..with larger facilities than you can find at Wrigley. Even with 20K in the park. A full house, and you’d best….wait. I’m thinking that they MUST install monitors and remove the radio speakers. You just miss way too much of the game.

At least at concession lines, there are multiple TV monitors.

This is a strange topic. With 49K in Dodger Stadium Saturday and smaller facilities that include you-know-what, I waited for less time than in brand-spanking new Petco, with larger, modern rest rooms and 19K in the park.on Monday.

Azjazzman, I respect your opinion but I see no way to explain this but what I’ve thrown out there.

I’ve said enough on this. Again, we agree to disagree and let’s let it go. Enough “toilet talk.”

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I have been in a quite a few of the newer parks

but you are right, I have not been to Petco. Hope to remedy that soon.

But, don’t assume that what you have experienced at Petco is typical of newer parks. I have never experienced a bathroom wait at any of the 10 or so that I have been to…not even right at the end of a close game when everyone rushes for the men’s room.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

....or you could just build more bathrooms

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which is probably what will happen.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They didn't at Petco

and there was plenty of room to do so. There wasn’t enough room at Soldier Field.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's only so much room in the Wrigley footprint.

I doubt if there’s room for more ‘facilities’ than there are now, and I guarantee the lines will be longer then there are now. Also, an equal number of women’s rooms must be built.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The typical design criteria now

is to have about 40% more women’s rest rooms than mens. Don’t know how they arrived at that, but that is what you see in the newer parks.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Ivy must stay.

You can do a lot with the grandstand itself, but the ivy is untouchable.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But I don't see the "need"...

…to have Pujols in a Cubs uniform. You can get Adrian Gonzalez for far less, and D. Lee is doing just fine at the one-bag. As a matter of fact, I don’t even want Pujols to make the trip north. Let him stay a Cardinal.

The ivy is the one completely identifiable feature of Wrigley that makes it Wrigley. Get rid of that and you might as well move the damn stadium to Naperville, and, that my friend, would be horrible. The Cubs need to win in Wrigley Field; anything less would be akin to a left-handed compliment.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't buy a World Series.

Just go ask the Yankees. For that matter, go ask Real Madrid. How many UEFA cups and how many Liga Trophies did they win during their “Galacticos” phase? A whole lot of nothing.

Albert is a lovely hitter, but he could just as easily have a sorry-año like somebody else we know, break his leg, or a wrist like D. Lee and be absolutely useless.

It’s a team sport, my friend. No team is ever just-one position player away from a World Series win.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How many titles do the Yankees have in the last 101 years? Please refresh my memory.

i can’t believe anyone that actually cares if their team wins would advocate not signing the best possible players. Truly unreal.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It sounds like you'd be better off in NYC.

The best players are the ones that help you win, not ones that cost the most. How many times has A-Rod come up lame in the playoffs in recent memory?

The Cubs are more than fine at both corners. Adrien Gonzalez would be a more than adequate back-up at 1B, and then segue into starting when the time came to pass. And I’ll take a fraction of what you’d use to sign Pujols and sign Trevor Hoffman to close. He’s past his prime, but he still saved thirty games in ’08 on a bad Padres team, and has saved 26-games so far on a pretty good Milwaukee club.

A proper closer is far more necessary than Albert to the Cubs.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are lots of people I would...

…sign over Albert Pujols. You sign Pujols, and I’ll take that same sum and sign Adrien Gonzalez, Trevor Hoffman, Matt Cain, Tim Lincecum, & Carlos Gonzalez to multi-year deals. And Albert will strike out far more often than he would hit.

Heck, I could probably get Freddy Sanchez or Hanley Rameriz in there, too.

Now who has gotten the most use out of their revenue? For what you’ve spent on one-player, I have five who put my team in a better chance of winning it all on a repeated basis. And that’s without ridiculously overextending myself, and ‘needing’ to extort extra revenue.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's about maximizing revenue to sign the best possible players which now you are apparently not even disputing.

You say you would take the “same sum” and in order to sign the players you suggest the Cubs would still need to maximize revenue. If you think signing Pujols is far-fetched your scenario is even more ridiculous. You are having a real hard time comprehending that the point is to make the most money possible not what specific players should be signed. I would also like to add that you have exposed yourself to be incapable of rational thought when you suggest that Trevor Hoffman would be “far more necessary than Albert…” Again, Ahahahhaahh

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You want to maximize revenue...

…and I want to maximize use of current revenue. A savvy GM could have probably signed two or three of those names for what was given to Milton, and all of them given Fonzi’s contract. Lincecum isn’t even making a million-bucks this year.

Quality pitching beats quality hitting. Hoffman as a closer is far more valuable to the Cubs organization than another 1B.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You understand that Lincecum hasn't reached free agency and that's why he's not being paid as much? You don't seem to understand the concept here.

I’m not arguing about how to best spend the revenue, again it’s about making as much revenue as possible. Just for fun, I looked up Albert Pujols’ WAR and since 2002 it is 61 and over that same time span Trevor Hoffman’s WAR is 8.4. That makes Pujols over 7 times more valuable than Hoffman. So you might think Hoffman would be “far more valuable” but you would be horrendously wrong.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand the concept, and...

…I disagree with you. Without knowing the specifics of the internal working of the Cubs’ finances, I posted some numbers below. If they’re anywhere close to being correct, that’s $250-million annual (from just two streams) that the FO has to field a World Series winner. To date, they haven’t. The payroll has become bloated, and “maximizing revenue” to sustain that bloat is ridiculous; it’s even more ridiculous to suggest continually throwing money at the problem is going to somehow make it better when the Cubs don’t have a foundation to stand on.

Fiscal irresponsibility at its finest. An irresponsibility that’s going to be foisted off on the fans.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 6:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Payroll is not Ricketts only concern.

Do you think he’s going to make his mortgage payments out of his own pocket or revenue generated by the team? Significant capital improvements also need to be made to the park. Those are things that are indisputable whether you agree with me or not. You are not looking at the big picture.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is hilarious

“The best hitter in baseball is overrated and will cost too much. I propose we use that money and get the best all-around player in baseball, the best pitcher in baseball, and just for shits and giggles, a quality #2 starter and a decent 2B.”

The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 22, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, "pound sand" will get you real far in negotiating.

I hope you don’t have to negotiate deals as part of your job. You’d probably get fired in one day.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those who scream bloody murder about proposed changes to Wrigley typically fall into two classes...

1. Fans who very rarely atttend games at Wrigley Field in the first place.

2. Some of the pukes within Wrigleyville who are hypocrites given that the sky high value of their real estate is thanks LARGELY to the presence of the Cubs at Clark and Addison.

"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)

by BLou on Aug 22, 2009 5:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm agreeing w you guys to a point

 I understand the feeling of dont change the ballpark period, and i agree to a poin., the point of moving it to naperville or something totally ridiculous like that would change the entire experience more so than just a jumbotron. The little things that will only add to the experience for everyone should be welcomed and not met with the knee jerk reactions of traditionalists, I’e pitch speed and digital scoreboards on UD facade.

we a fans have to face facts we need to be making money to win that world series. and the jumbotron can help that generate dollars, but much like fenway there’s ways to do it while keeping the essence of the wrigley experience, IE the Neighborhood, bicks and ivy, the old manual scoreboard the marquee.
Theres no one that should be against adding the jumbo tron to the rooftops. It make sense and dollars. So im agreeing with you both just not to the extreme position you guys have, maybe read the whole post and think before reacting negatively.

And eventually they have to tear down the entire grandstand and make a new park thats not “smelly”.
but if you two honestly think the park has anything to do with them not winning a world series, then you are off your rocker. Bad baseball can be played anywhere.

by meancubface on Aug 22, 2009 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

albert pujols will never be a cub no matter what the price.

and he wont be the best player in baseball forever. its not about one guy.

what are you even arguing anyway? that making wrigly one giant billboard where target advertises in the centerfield grass will bring us a world series? it has little do with how much money we have, its what we put on the field with the money we have.

World series championships are the sum of skill, determination, and pure dumb ass luck. he highest paid and most talented teams arent given the trophy. It’s all earned on the field.

im even agreeing wiht you that they should put up more advertising on a jumbotron but saying that they can leave the ivy when they do that and not move to naperville to build a giant billboard with lines and bases on it. cause no world series would matter in naperville, i;d barely care if it happened after we were at that point.

havent you ever heard that its not about where you are going, its about the ride. How are you gonna feel the day after the cubs win the world series?

my guess is hung over and bored becasue its all over.

by meancubface on Aug 22, 2009 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How has the World Series-less 101 year ride been treating you?

I never said anything is about one guy and I don’t understand your need to try and restate my thoughts. The point is that the new owner should do whatever they feel is necessary to maximize revenue without interference from simple-minded overly sentimental Wrigley fans that find a ball park more important than a World Series title. It’s obvious you are clearly a bigger fan of Wrigley than the Cubs, that’s your choice but why root for a stadium?

 No amount of revenue or any specific player guarantees anything but better players brought in with more money will increase the chances of consistent winning. I don’t go to Wrigley to watch the ivy grow, I go to watch the product on the field. I want to see the best possible product which is made possible by the revenue generated. You want to watch ivy? Go to a greenhouse.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Florida Marlins would like to have...

…a word with you about the correlation between payroll and competitiveness.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

New stadium does NOT always mean more revenue; ask the Padres

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Florida isn't moving into a new stadium in order to generate more revenue? What is your point?

The Padres new stadium has opened increased revenue streams and they are looking to dump payroll due to the owner’s divorce. Their new stadium has nothing to do with their financial issues but nice try. BTW I wasn’t contending the Cubs were going to build a new stadium I was just pointing out facts to the disillusioned.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The POINT

is that the Padres did shit with the revenue they generated. New park for the Pirates, nothing. Orioles and Camden Yards all this time? Squat. Reds? Dusty Baker. Marlins and a new park? Since no one goes now anyway, likely it won’t do much for their revenue either.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You keep changing your point. I said that Florida was moving to a new stadium to increase revenue and that is true.

You brought up San Diego and you were wrong about their stadium not generating more revenue for them. You keep changing the argument when it’s shown that your point is not valid. Now you are saying that since the Pirates, Orioles, Reds and Padres aren’t winning the Cubs shouldn’t try to maximize their revenue? There is a reason that the teams in the playoffs on average are the teams that have the higher revenues and payrolls.

You make a big deal about me using the word “stupid” but you have no problem using profanity. Seems rather hypocritical to me.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

as would the boston red sox and ny yanks with you

" I hate that lady , but would totally do her. So strange is this mind of mens." - Skisgaar Skwigelf

by Rage and Grace on Aug 22, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He said that?

Yikes…..

" I hate that lady , but would totally do her. So strange is this mind of mens." - Skisgaar Skwigelf

by Rage and Grace on Aug 22, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

For those in the cheap seats...

…I would sign a quality closer, Trevor Hoffman included, over Albert Pujols on any given day of the week.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 22, 2009 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

That’s just … well, I think it’s 100% wrong.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree to disagree, Al.

If we’re plugging holes in the current incarnation of the Cubs, there is no need for another, or a new, 1B. There is immediate need for a time-tested closer. So even if Albert was currently available, he’s not a player I would be looking at. Unless, of course, you’re willing to immediately jettison Lee who’s been just fine at 1B.

We can talk after 2010 about the viability of putting Pujols in Cubbie Blue. Given his age (29, I believe), I suspect there would be a diminishing return on a $100-million plus investment (which is what I suspect he’ll be getting as a FA). At 27, I see a better long term investment for the organization in somebody like Adrian Gonzalez.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 2:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is no immediate need for an ancient closer that is unlikely to help the team in the short-term, let alone the long-term.

Fixed

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Derrek Lee is only under contract for one more season and any top free agent replacement will cost.

If you think Adrian Gonzalez is going to be cheap when he reaches free agency you are sadly mistaken. Take a look at the deal Teixeira got from New York, I’m sure A Gon is going to be asking for something in that neighborhood.

The best free agents are going to want to go somewhere that the ownership not only spends on them but spends on the whole payroll to field a competitive team. If you think players like Adrian Gonzalez, Hanley Ramirez and Tim Lincecum aren’t going to command top dollar as free agents, you need to come out from under that rock.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You do realize Hoffman's age.....right?

Any pitch could be his last. There’s no way any team should overpay for a closer. Only Mariano Rivera is worth it. Other teams can identify closers — the Padres did, with Heath Bell.

Way cheaper than Hoffman. Bell will soon be available, and is worth a decent contract — but not a huge contract. How’s that Kerry Wood deal working out for the Tribe? How soon we forget how Eric Gagne failed for zillions of dollars.

Carlos Marmol might be the guy. The only way to know is to let him do it NOW, as the season is lost. If he can do it — you have a quality guy on the cheap. If not, you look elsewhere. Teams should develop closers, not pay huge sums for them.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's younger than Randy Johnson.

But I am not looking for a long-term investment in Hoff; a one-year deal is what I was interested in. Hoff’s contract with the Brewers won’t be up until the end of this season, but where he would earn his money on the Cubs payroll, and I mentioned this to Al, is as a mentor to Marmol. I expect Marmol to be the Cubs full-time closer for years to come; he’s clearly shown to have the stuff, but has a problem with command & focus. It’s a relatively expensive option, but I can’t help imagine how much some regular work with the all-time leader in saves would help Marmol. It’s one of those unquantifiable things like how much did Blanco help out with Geo’s ROY-season?

I like the Bell option, but I expect him to be re-signed. I believe that what’s his names divorce is finally over (or close to it), and that the Padres will eventually start to become competitive again. How soon that’ll be I have no idea, but locking up a quality closer is a step in the right direction.

That said, I’d float a contract by Bell’s agent if the occasion called for it. It’d be a modest contract, buy a lot of standards here, but worthwhile. Let the others here show their profound sense of fiscal irresponsibility.

I’ll see you your Eric Gagne, and raise you the spectacular on-going failure of Barry Zito.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 3:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we overrate the 'help'

players bring to others. Only Greg Maddux might qualify, since others pitchers have gone on record as saying so.

Having Henry Blanco around probably (but we’ll never know, this is mere speculation) would not have saved Soto this year, unless Blanco followed Soto around in the offseason.

I don’t think the Padres will keep Bell.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a fact that the teams in the playoffs have a higher than average revenue.

If you believe there is no correlation between payroll and the ability to put better players on the field then you are misinformed. Obviously the Cubs haven’t been able to develop the same kind of talent that Florida has thus they need as much revenue as possible. I would also like to let you in on the secret that Florida is actually moving to a new stadium in order to increase their revenue. What successful business franchise doesn’t try and maximize their revenue? It’s silly to even argue that a business shouldn’t attempt to maximize their revenue.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're missing the point

and on top of which cannot back that first statement at all. We have no idea what Albert Pujols is going to do in the next few years. He could be in a freak kite flying accident and sever his hand. He could go on a freak HR hitting binge and hit 100 HR’s in a season. While either are likely, just as you can’t w/ your statement about Pujols, I can’t with mine.

It’s not hard to figure out. Wrigley being one giant billboard = revenue. Revenue = more payroll flexibility. If that means the Cubs have to turn CF into a Trojan Condoms commercial then so be it. It’s no worse than the joke of futility this orginization has made itself.

You’re right though. The playoffs are a crapshoot, but getting there certainly is not. Let’s put it this way, if having that Trojan condom sign in CF means bring the most talented bat in the game then I’m willing to laugh my ass off while they win the WS.

" I hate that lady , but would totally do her. So strange is this mind of mens." - Skisgaar Skwigelf

by Rage and Grace on Aug 22, 2009 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You left out the self-important Wrigley season ticket holder that clings to the false nostalgia of Wrigley.

There are a great number of Cubs fans that seem to place the value of the “Wrigley” experience over the value of winning a title. I suppose they do this to justify all the time and money they have put into a franchise that has failed to deliver a World Series title in 101 years.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 22, 2009 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, there are some people like that.

Crane Kenney has told me more than once that he’s met people like that.

I couldn’t disagree more with that. I want to win. I also like what Wrigley Field is, but I think it can be modernized, keep the traditions, AND build a winning team.

All of the above is possible with new ownership.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 22, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree

I am for a Jumbotron if done right, and obviously modernizing the park too. But I want some of the aesthetics to be kept. To me, winning a WS title is the most important, but, as Al points out, I also think we can do that and keep a few of the storied traditions (ivy, old scoreboard).

Plus, it’s not like we don’t have the revenue now. I realize we need to increase it in the future to keep up with things, but my God, we have $135 million dollars (3rd in the league), that was grossly misspent on bad contracts. This is something very important that needs to be fixed first. Hopefully Mr. Ricketts will place that at the top of the list (I know it’s easier said than done).

Learn this line, and use it often- "Yes dear, you're right, I'm sorry" -Bob Brenly

by SotoRiot on Aug 23, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or they place that value higher than winning because that is their mindset.

Look, the whole Vince Lombardi view of winning is a very American mindset. In other parts of the world, more emphasis is placed things like playing style or the overall fan experience.

The point is, not all fans strive to win as much as you do- and that’s OK. It’s not a defense mechanism, it’s just a different mindset. All sports teams, Cubs included, have variation in their fanbases.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The thing is the stadium needs to be renovated.

A jumbotron may be needed so that Ricketts can make his mortgage payments. On top of his mortgage payments and current expenses he will also have to find a way to renovate a crumbling stadium that is nearly 100 years old. Wrigley’s grandstand needs to be renovated. Clubhouse facilities need to be upgraded. It’s unreasonable for a fanbase to expect Rickets to run this business in anything but a modern fashion.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is an argument I agree with more.

I’ll say this, though: I hope Ricketts can find a way to renovate Wrigley without really changing its identity- almost a “facelift”, if you will. I would like that to not include a Jumbotron, because IMO that would change Wrigley for the worse. Maybe that isn’t possible, but I suspect it is.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Fans who very rarely attend games at Wrigley Field in the first place"

Not everyone can attend games at Wrigley as often as you presumably can. It’s not like if you’re not there, you don’t care.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the other side to the argument

Is that for fans that rarely attend, Wrigley Field is more of a destination to experience all things baseball. Now there is nothing wrong with that, but I believe it can cloud your vision of what is really important. When people visit Wrigley, it seems like they wish they could roll it all up and stuff it in thier pocket for later. Thats cool, but it is a narrow-minded approach – Wrigley is a vehicle for the team to play at home, and the importance should be placed on the team. Times change – things change, I think it can be done to make everyone happy. But IMO, priority should be given to the true purpose of the park – to be a place for the Cubs to play, and the fans to watch them play.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 24, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just be careful what you wish for...

How many of the new stadiums have you been to around the country?

All are incredibly nice in that they have state of the art electronics and wonderful amenities; however, nearly all have absolutely zero personality (e.g. Great American, Nationals). Some try too hard to force personality (Minute Maid).

Wrigley has that personality in spades. Then again, amenities and loud noises are not what I attend a baseball game for. I understand your points, just be careful what you wish for…

by Zonk on Aug 24, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some did a good job though

Mainly I’m thinking of PNC and Camden yards. I haven’t been to it yet, but I’ve also heard good things about Pac Bell.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 24, 2009 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pac Bell

now AT&T is a fabulous ball park. In fact, I like all of the new ball parks I have been to, but AT&T is a cut above.

by azjazzman on Aug 24, 2009 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like AT&T best of the new parks.

Perfect location, perfectly executed.

PNC is probably 2nd.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 24, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But the truth of the matter is, that it cannot remain a relic of days gone by. I think they can make needed improvements, without sacrificing the things you suggest. For example, I find it unlikely that they will scrap the organ in favor of loud music like Chase Field. I have been to Wrigley 30 plus times [I’m not from Chicago] and all the parks out west including Petco, Chase Field, Safeco, etc. Do I want Wrigley to be like those parks – NO. But there are things that need to be done, most importantly renovations that would support moving administrative functions out of Wrigley Field to make room for better locker rooms, and training facilities, as well as better club suites. Wrigley Field’s personality is not going anywhere, and the new managment (or any management for that matter) would never sacrifice what has made the place a goldmine. But tasteful improvements can be made in my opinion.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 24, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Understood.

i just want to make sure that BLou wasn’t equating frequency of attendance with level of fanaticism.

by Pat19 on Aug 24, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The thing about this article that really bothers me...

is not the jumbotron, but this…

All of that said, the ultimate goal for the new owners will be to find new ways to generate revenue. One way will be through PSLs (personal seat licensing), which could cost season-ticket holders upwards of $20,000 a seat over a three- or four-year period of time. That type of tariff alone could generate $40 million for the Ricketts family debt service./blockquote>

If the Ricketts impose PSL’s, I know this season ticket holder since 1984 will be out. I can’t afford that kind of payment just for the rights to buy tickets.

See what old Cubs Scorecards looked like at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/scorecards.html
Also, see the Cubs 2009 schedule at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/sched2009.html

by kaseyi on Aug 22, 2009 7:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Finally somebody willing to maximize revenue

Screw tradition of Wrigley Field. A jumbotron would make money, so would selling naming rights to the field, so will PSLs, so will renovating the stadium.

All that will allow us to maintain and even inflate our payroll. I hope all this stuff happens.

Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.

by nji232 on Aug 22, 2009 8:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

All of that most likely will happen.

It’s interesting that people fail to understand that the Cubs is a business and Mr. Ricketts will most likely run it as such.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do all of you people think just 'dropping' a video board

on top of somebody’ s roof is so easy?

First, you have to convince some owner to give up his ‘roof-top’ revenue. If you can top that……fine…let alone retro-fit the roof.

Secondly…..I would think zoning laws would prohibit such massive signage in a residential neighborhood that’s not on a main street. The board would really have to be quite high. It would have to be way bigger than the Miller Lite® sign on Sheffield. For some reason, I don’t see the good folks of Lakeview buying this.

I do not see anything like this happening.

And, even if you tried to put it in CF — that slot is too small. Sorry, it wouldn’t be JUMBO.

Video boards are huge now, if you haven’t noticed. This would just look stupid, and would be dated the moment you build it. You’d have to keep new technology coming.

The boards at ball parks just used for crap. If they were ever really used properly, then you’d have something. At least almost every play — is replayed on NFL boards. That’s useful.

Instead, we’d be treated to “Find the ball under the hat” or the “CTA Bus Races”.
Today, at Dodger Stadium the Video Board told us that Matt Kemp kinda looks like John Legend and he like to watch TV. Fascinating!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please. Let this crap be everywhere else but Wrigley.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:56 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

But if that crap is the difference between signing a player who can help us win

and not signing that player, then it would be stupid not to have it. Precious Wrigley is great, but it hasn’t won the Cubs jack. If blowing it up meant winning the World Series I would do it in a heartbeat.

Adding a jumbotron has no negatives besides upsetting a few purists who need to wake up and get with the times.

Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.

by nji232 on Aug 23, 2009 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

I find the Cubs payroll to be bloated; a really good FO could field a highly competitive team for between $80 & $100-million. The Southsiders are around this mark, and if the BoSox divest themselves of Matsuzaka’s contract, they’ll be around ten-million over that mark.

Somebody here once said, they Cubs take in $1.5-million just in beer sales per game. Over a total season, that’s $125,500,000. Couple that with $120,000,000 in ticket sales (at $40/per and ~3-million fans per season), and the Cubs should be more than flush. $250-million should be more than enough to field a team, coaches, and settle-up the FO. If the rest of the monies that come with revenue sharing, tv deals, other merchandise, and remaining concessions aren’t comparable then I’d be shocked. If you can’t work with all of that, then I don’t know what to tell you.

The bottom-line is, there have been poor baseball related decisions made in the Cubs organization. Certain parties want to mortgage the farm to win it all now, but continuing to throw money at a situation isn’t going to do much of anything.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 4:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if you read the actual post but Ricketts may need the revenue from a JumboTron to make his mortgage payments on the team.

Any business attempts to maximize revenue streams and you can expect a business man of Ricketts acumen to do just that.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt that....

…. if the sale was contingent on Ricketts finding a way to generate more revenue, the deal would never have happened.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did it occur to you that before he got the banks to loan him the money he had to show them how he could generate additional money to pay them off?

What world do you live on where people buy a business and don’t project how to increase their revenue? I didn’t make this up.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We're talking about businesses here, not individuals

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not going to turn away from additional revenue streams, that's just stupid.

If you think he’s going to use his personal assets to finance this team you are sadly mistaken. Banks would not only look at current assets they would look at future income potential. How can you dispute that? It’s just silly

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No. No. And HECK No.

My thoughts on this abomination of desolation can be further scoured here.

The argument always comes up about money somehow guaranteeing the Cubs the ability to get good free agent talent. And that the Cubs need to bag it anyway they can – hence the often cited need for those loud, stupid and vulgar electronic monstrosities called Jumbotrons for Corporate America to pour economic stimuli into pro franchises.

But talent and skills don’t mean squat if there’s no daily consistent execution of them. 1 year ago, that wasn’t the problem. This year, it’s a different and all too familiar story. Jim Hendry has done a good job of getting talent in recent years, but overspending on it this year clearly has been our bane .. and this year, with the recent acquisitions for the “stretch” clearly misfiring, I think he’s just thrown up his hands and is quietly cleaning his desk out.

I would hope the Ricketts see that, invest heavily in scouting and the farms once more and get some new hungry talent to revive the Cubs.

Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we will go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..

coda

ELO, 1975

by cubnational on Aug 23, 2009 7:03 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ricketts is going to have a $30MM mortgage payment and the park needs capital improvements.

The place has falling concrete in case you have forgotten. Revenue generated from a JumboTron may be needed for Ricketts to even break even. You can not expect him to go into personal debt to run this team, he’s a business man. I don’t know if you are aware but large video screens were put up for the Blackhawks game and most were in agreement that it worked pretty well. Ricketts should definitely invest in scouting and the farm system on top of the capital improvements the ball park needs and continuing to have a competitive payroll. This team already has major payroll commitments that aren’t going away. You may be against it on principle but it will be a reality in some form.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The place HAD falling concrete.

That was five years ago. That problem has been fixed.

That said, the park does need substantial renovation.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it's no longer an issue why are there still nets up?

I don’t think they have netting up to catch falling concrete in other stadiums, do they? I see you actually agree with my point which is the ball park needs substantial renovation.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The nets are up ...

… “just in case”, not because any concrete has fallen.

I do agree with your principal point regarding renovation, yes, and also agree with you regarding a Jumbotron — or anything that will produce new revenue.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

People also seem to be unaware that Ricketts will need additional revenue to pay for the team.

Trib Co already owned the team thus they didn’t need the revenue he will need to pay for the purchase. This seems to be a very important point people aren’t recognizing.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You & I recognize it.

Actually, the last couple of years the Cubs have tried to get some new revenue streams with the bleacher naming rights deal, the Under Armour deal, the Captain Morgan club. Obviously, they can make far more with a Jumbotron, or their own TV channel, etc.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right, they have already been trying to open new revenue streams and the purchase will increase the need for it. Absolutely.

Unfortunately for Ricketts, TribCo has already locked in sweetheart broadcasting deals for WGN and Comcast that probably don’t give maximum benefit to the ball club. Ricketts is going to have to get more creative with revenue streams due to the fact that he can’t just start his own Cubs network. The Cubs would most certainly like to emulate the extremely profitable broadcasting networks that Boston and New York have created for themselves.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I recognze that, Al.

I think a lot of people do. Personally speaking, if Clan Ricketts cannot find a way to pay for x, y, & z, with current revenue, then he overpaid for the team; that $45-million net profit that piece of hearsay states the Cubs make would more than cover Ricketts’ payment to the bank. An honest-to-goodness Cubs fan would be willing to accept a wash in his investment, if not even a small loss for the first couple of years.

You don’t need to maximize anymore revenue out of the Cubs if you’re using what you have smartly.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 24, 2009 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

money

The people on this thread who assert that money from a jumbotron or billboards on the walls would lead to a world championship haven’t been paying attention the last 30 years or so.

In that time span, the Cubs have gone from no advertising or electronic billboards at Wrigley to an abundance. They’ve sold off the naming rights for the bleachers. They’ve raised ticket prices from $1.50 for a bleacher seat to $50. They’ve added restaurants and private clubs to the ballpark. Presumably, all this has brought in tons of money, which has allowed the team to raise its payroll from around $2 million in 1979 to well over $100 million now.

So with all this additional revenue, where is our World Championship?

I’ve been coming to Wrigley since 1975. I’ve seen all these changes to the park, most of which have been for the worse, but the team still doesn’t win. Transforming Wrigley into the North Side equivalent of the Cell wouldn’t change anything. On the other hand, an improved scouting system, and perhaps a change in schedule so that the Cubs can play more night games, might make a big difference.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Aug 23, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Your right

But at the same time, what’s the best possible way for Ricketts to make money?

Have a fire sale? Hopefully not.
Have ads around the park to hopefully build a better team? I don’t mind it.

Yes there are tons of other ways to make money but if he sees a tron as being a profitable way, I personally have no problems with that whatsoever.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't have a fire sale

We go over this again and again. Such a move is made when a team wants to get rid of players which finally have earned their big pay day. (Marlins)

These players HAVE their money. Most teams cannot afford these contracts. If they did want to take a flyer on one of these individuals, the players are performing so far below their career norms — the Cubs would literally have to pay most of the contract anyway. Yeah, you’d have a bloated contract out of the line-up, but not off the books.

You have to hope the player performs to norm — then, his value returns. Then, maybe you can deal to pay LESS of his contract if you can move him.

There will be NO fire sales.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

This team generates more money than God as it is. The team’s popularity is global. Every city they go to attendance goes up because the Cubs are in town. Every away game seems almost like a home gmae. Moreover, this idea that a jumbotron will somehow cure the team’s woes falls right in line with every other cockamamie story that has followed this team. “It took over a hundred years, but we finally figured out that allit took was a really big screen TV.” If that was the case, I invite the Cubs to play in my living room.

This team has blown plenty of money over the years on free agents, we all know that. A jumbotron won’t suddenly make the same guys who did the signings that much smarter. I would strongly suggest, as much as I like Hendry as a person, that he either be replaced or hire some talent evaluators, before the team succumb to the silly notion a jumbotron will cure all the problems.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except that now the owner has a huge sum of money due each year

that takes priority over the team’s payroll. He still wants to turn a profit which is the goal of all businesses. I wouldn’t be very easy to do that while maintaining the current payroll the Cubs have.

Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.

by nji232 on Aug 23, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who suggested that a jumbotron would cure anything?

It would open additional revenue streams which is what businesses do. The jumbotron will not be the only solution to generating more revenue but it will most certainly be an avenue that new ownership explores. You are entitled to not like it but it will happen.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have either of you ever run a business or purchased a home?

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me see your credentials? Interesting approach to counter an argument you disagree with.

Again who said a jumbotron would cure anything? You have some interesting straw man arguments going.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Try to discuss without being smug and calling things stupid

This is in reply to your post here and the one above. Since you didn’t answer my question about whether you’ve ever purchased a home, I’ll explain my point.

Home buying, a lender runs your credit. They want to ensure you’ll be able to service the debt you already have along with the loan they’re going to make for the house. They won’t loan you the money of course otherwise, and they won’t in the promise you’ll get a raise or a second job. Here. the bank loaning Ricketts the money needs to be assured he can meet the existing payroll (long term contracts, etc., all the other obligations it takes to run the Cubs. Then they’ll evaluate whether he can meet the loan payment on the sale of the team, based upon the expected revenue of the team and whatever else Ricketts declares as income. They WON’T complete the transaction based upon Ricketts saying he’ll get more partners, or he’ll try and raise more revenue via a jumbtron, highwe ticket prices or whatever else he might do.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't......

….. and you still haven’t answered.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Buying a house is completely different than buying a baseball team

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In terms of the lender making sure it's a good loan, how so?

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

First of all, the money is a lot higher

And it’s a business. I’m sure they had to submit some sort of business plan to the banks. What do I know though, I’m not a banker. But I think it means a lot more when you have a business plan than when joe schmoe says he’ll do something.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only the straw man argument said, "a jumbotron will cure all problems."

It may be a tough concept for some to understand but businesses look to maximize profit. Ricketts will have a $30MM per year mortgage payment to make and it was reported in the newspaper that a jumbotron may be an avenue he would explore to do so. Video screens were put up for the Blackhawks game at Wrigley and most agreed that it was a nice feature. Let’s not be so naive as to think Ricketts will not explore every available avenue to increase revenue, he is a shrewd business man. Businesses look to make money, it’s very possible he will attempt to cut payroll and still increase revenue.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Personally, it's not that I believe it won't happen, only that it shouldn't.

So I don’t dispute your points about Ricketts wanting to maximize profits; I just don’t like what they mean.

by Pat19 on Aug 23, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would improving the ball park and the revenue streams create a sad day? Anyone concerned with this team actually winning a championship should want them to do whatever is necessary to maximize revenue in order to field the best possible team. It’s sad that fan pressure to preserve an outdated hazard to public safety might keep all revenue streams from being maximized.


.
It’s about maximizing revenue to sign the best possible players which now you are apparently not even disputing.


. But if that crap is the difference between signing a player who can help us win and not signing that player, then it would be stupid not to have it. Precious Wrigley is great, but it hasn’t won the Cubs jack. If blowing it up meant winning the World Series I would do it in a heartbeat.

Adding a jumbotron has no negatives besides upsetting a few purists who need to wake up and get with the times.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a post, it's Art

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still waiting to see where anyone says, "jumbotron cures all problems."

A jumbotron would increase revenue. This is not in dispute. When you increase revenue you have more money available to sign better players. You seem to have a problem with this concept. A jumbotron will be one area in many that Ricketts will look at in order to maximize the profits of his business enterprise. You also neglect to recognize the many other areas I’ve addressed. Ricketts would want to increase revenue not just to sign players but to rehab a decaying stadium and pay his $30MM monthly mortgage payment on the team.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrigley needs lots of modernization

Lockerrooms, batting cages, bathrooms, concessions, new exterior, more club suites….

Anybody who routinenly attends games at Wrigley is amply aware of the shortcomings of the ballpark. Even more importantly, Ricketts is going to need to identify new revenue streams….lile personal seat licenses, more private suites and YES to a jumbotron.

"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)

by BLou on Aug 23, 2009 12:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And better food

I love Chicago food more than most. If I could have Italian Beef or a real deep dish pizza every day I would. That being said, the food at Wrigley is horrible.

Wrigley ranks as my favorite ballpark. Food ranks as the worse out of the 10+ I’ve been too.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think teams look at Jumbotrons

as revenue generators. They look at them as enhancing the fan experience, which may lead to additional tickets sold, but even that is rather hard to quantify. How many people are saying, “hey, let’s go to a game today and watch the video screen!”?

It is simply a ball park enhancement, no different than better concession stands, kids play areas, etc

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could be reading your post wrong, and if so I apologize

but a vast majority (if not all) of the jumbotron revenue is from advertising, not putting more butts in the seats

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure

it takes quite a few years before the advertising revenue generated by a Jumbotron (which is pretty meager) would exceed the cost of purchasing and installing the ’Tron, which are really expensive. And by then, the pressure starts to upgrade the board with newer technology, size, etc.

I heard the President/CEO of the D’Backs say recently, when they installed a new Jumbotron, that it was mainly about enhancing fan experience and not revenue generation, so I didn’t pull that out of the air.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, if I own a roof top

I am just going to screw the Cubs into overpaying to place that MegaTron atop my rooftop. That, of course – is after somehow they get the proper city approval to do this on a residential street. Nobody wants to touch that assertion yet, I see.

I will now refer to this as “Fantasy Megatron” in the same manner as we do to “Fantasy Baseball.” (or DFA!) Snap your fingers, and Alfonso Soriano is traded to the Blue Jays for five players and the Cubs don’t pay a dime of his deal.

Poof, — some property owner gives his roof to the Cubs for….nothing!!!

The most logical spot for such a Megatron is in the place of the old board. It’s on their damn property. They don’t have to split the revenue with some guy who owns a 2-flat on Sheffield and was making plenty of money already from his roof-top seating. If you want improvements, just go all the way, why do it half-assed?

I can see the next statement…

“Put it where the Miller Lite® sign is!"

That would be kind of like putting a 12-inch screen up there. Those are narrow buildings. And, with sun angles the LF bleachers wouldn’t see it for day games. (The RF bleachers would never see the board, anyway)

If you think a Megatron board will bring the Cubs into a World Series…well, I don’t think anything will change your mind.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 12:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Are you aware that they put large video screens for the Blackhawks game? It can be done, already has been.

Ricketts will look to increase revenue streams and it may not lead to a World Series and that still doesn’t mean he won’t pursue it. It’s fantasy to assume a business isn’t going to look to increase revenue.

by Acapulco Taco Pie on Aug 23, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You've said this about 4-5 timea t least by now

And yes, we all know. They were temporary, and were more like big screens than any jumbotron. Placement was also not very practical for baseball.

http://www.cubsbythenumbers.com/wc-pic12a.jpg

http://chicagoist.com/attachments/Marcus%20Gilmer/2009_02_17_wrigley.jpg

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 23, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

did y’all notice the in the debut of Jimmy Jones $1.2B monument to himself and Cowboys football, there were TWO punts that ricocheted off the much publicized GINORMOUS video screens? And now they are saying it will cost millions of dollars to raise them out of the way? LOLOLOL

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just wait till some Cowboys punts bounce off them.

They’ll be raised in two seconds.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently they were raised for a concert, so it shouldn't be a big deal;

of course, with Jerry Jones, it’s more an issue of pride than anything (or so I suspect).

by Pat19 on Aug 24, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo!

You just nailed it.

by azjazzman on Aug 24, 2009 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds to me

like the NFL needs to change the specs.

I also heard Jones say that there was no problem. Two punts bouncing off it in the first game! How can that not be a problem???

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I heard about that.

I couldn’t decide which was worse: the Yankees RF jet stream or hanging the video monitors so low that punts bounce off them?

Silly HOK Sports people.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 23, 2009 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know about the millions of dollars to raise them

Maybe it would cost that much to permanently move them higher, but I read where they are going to raise them temporarily for a U2 concert. I know U2 packs them in, but I can’t imagine promoters taking on a multi-million dollar expense just for one show.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 24, 2009 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A megatron board?

They need to get an Optimus Prime video screen instead. None of that decepticon crap

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They can't get rid of the current scoreboard

IIRC it’s protected by landmark protection or somesuch. Of course people aren’t going to snap their fingers and have this appear, there are always logistics to work these out. I’m sure the rooftop owners are drooling over the $$ that they might be able to get from this deal if it ends up on their building(s)

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

by berselius on Aug 23, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point

But its not like they are going to run down to Best Buy and pick up the biggest flat screen they can find and slap it on top of a rooftop. It would cost millions of dollars for one to be created and tailored to work amidst the conditions you suggest. It can be done, has been done, and likely will be done.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 23, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is one of those Blue Jays... ADAM LIND????

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 23, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

On a more serious note...

If a “MegaTron” goes up on a rooftop – and I think that’s a big if, btw – then I think the only logical place for it is the Budweiser house. Or more accurately, on top of whatever goes up after they tear the Budweiser house town.

That house sold late last season, supposedly for around $8-9M. I think the buyer is the same guy/group that just put up those two brand new rooftop buildings over on Sheffield (where the old Red Top parking lot used to be). And word on the corner (literally) is that a similar type building (big hulking concrete monstrosity) is planned to replace the Budweiser house.

Obviously nothing has happened yet, so I suppose if Cubs/Ricketts were interested, they could enter into discussions with this guy/group and figure out what would it take – structurally and financially – to put a jumbotron on top of the roof. At least they’d have the advantage of being able to start from scratch and do it right.

However, I don’t foresee a rooftop solution happening anytime soon. I just think the logistics (financial, legal, political, and physical) are challenging enough even for a Cubs-only solution. Trying to work a deal with a thrid-party private property owner just seems too much for me. Ricketts will have plenty of other headaches to deal with these next few years.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 23, 2009 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I realize

That this argument has many people complaining about altering Wrigley Field. But the truth of the matter is that there are ways to make Wrigley modern without impacting the experience that baseball and non-baseball fans enjoy. To try and make Wrigley some kind of museum does nothing for the Chicago Cubs. It annoys me that some people care more about a building that the team itself. Renovations and a Jumbotron on a rooftop [As indicated the Scoreboard is protected – it will not change] are not going to turn Wrigley into the Old Yankee Stadium 70’s era refit. I think it would be done in a balanced and tasteful way. But to continue to worship the place as many do, is ridiculous. If you want to live in the past go to a real museum, and quit trying to make our team and our park a relic of the past.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 23, 2009 5:26 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Rec.

Everyone can be as sentimental as they want but please don’t take this the wrong way but anyone who is 110% against altering Wrigley Field to make money didn’t take business classes in college and lack the education that say someone such as Ricketts has.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My issue is NOT rebuilding Wrigley

That will need to happen for the long-term. It’s this hangup with video boards that I just don’t understand.

They are not panaceas for a World Series. It’s another sliver of a possible income stream, and that’s all.

But if you like music videos, non stop commercials (I will admit the “Dodgers Code Of Conduct” as performed by James Van Deer Beek was probaly the snarkiest, most entertaining bit I’ve seen on any board in years) “Fun Facts,” ("Did you know James Loney hits .282 on night games on odd-numbered Thuirsdays in the momth of April!!) and CTA bus races, well — enjoy.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 23, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its a hard sell

But once you said CTA bus races you got me. There is no looking back — this must be done.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 23, 2009 8:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know, my experience has been

that there is very little pure advertising on the video boards. I think teams are sensitive to that, especially after everybody had a fit over those little flip boards they put behind home plate for TV and of course, the attempt to put ads on the actual bases.

by azjazzman on Aug 23, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

????

Ads are non-stop on video boards in SD, LA, Anaheim. 75% (my estimate) is either a commercial, or a sponsored feature.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 25, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think its time

For people to drop the sentimental crap, its a tired old argument. Somehow the Cubs have been high jacked by those “fans” that would have them replaying games from the past (ala Field of Dreams). These are the same idiots that revel in the lore and history of things like curses. They also like nicknames like “the lovable losers”. It really pisses me off to hear fans say something like, “I want the Cubs to win, but not if they are gonna have put a jumbotron in”. IMO, these are the worst types of fans, more concerned with the aesthetics of a ballpark, than with the team taking the field.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 23, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't call them idiots

But you make a valid point.

These fans you refer to and there are a lot I’ve met live in a fairy tale world. They look at baseball just as fan and take in no consideration the business aspect. That’s ok, but they have to at the same time hear the other side of the story why it would be a good idea to build a tron or any other add-on for Wrigley.

by ak123 on Aug 23, 2009 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright

Sorry for the strong words, as much as I love Wrigley Field, I love the Cubs more. The park is simply a means to an end. I think the changes that many have suggested can help to retain the feeling that the setimentalists want, while also enhancing the experience for everyone. But I do find it silly for people to be more concerned with the fate of certain elements of the ballpark than with the team itself. Whats next? — A petition to leave the “Budweiser” building alone and save it from certain demolition? All in the name of keeping the “atmosphere” of Wrigley Field in tact?

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 24, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're absolutely right

And these people partially live in a fantasy world and have little to no understanding how baseball operations work.

by ak123 on Aug 24, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In my fantasy world there is no Free Agency.

But that must mean I have no understanding of how baseball operations work? Or is that because I find the Cubs to have a bloated payroll it has all the desperate thrashings of a charter franchise trying to furiously shake off 100-years of suck?

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 24, 2009 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This automatically ruins the atmosphere of Wrigley. This would be Cubs equivalent of pissing in the holy water.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 23, 2009 7:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It only ruins it if you LET it ruin it.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They can't take down the scoreboard can they?

It’s landmarked and all right?

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 23, 2009 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 23, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're absolutely right, Al.

And I’ll be sure to remind you of this when Ricketts introduces Ronnie Woo-Woo as the new Cubs PA announcer… ;-)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 23, 2009 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

WOO WOO up to bat #25 derrek lee WOO WOO

Theriot is not clutch, he's double clutch!

by jesus christos on Aug 23, 2009 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh.

That’ll never happen. (It better not, anyway.)

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al on Aug 24, 2009 6:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

God damn it

Nothing is automatically ruined. Its an old building, its cool that we play there but it needs some improvements. Its not a friggin Catherdral! Quit confusing attempts at spiritual bliss with a ballpark.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Aug 23, 2009 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jumbotron in Wrigley Field? Rather not.

As an expat, who has been away from Chicago for more than 3 decades, I suppose I’m not really entitled to have an opinion about this. However, one of things I loved as a child was the feeling of tradition in the ball park: No lights, Games called due to darkness, the ivy, the scoreboard, the organ music, the smell of hot dogs, etc. When I heard that lights were being installed and night games would be played on the North Side, it felt sacrilegious. Yes I know, understand and agree with many of the arguments why lights are better for the team, but still it just doesn’t feel right. I now get the same feeling when I read about the discussion of installing a jumbotron in or across the street from the stadium.

Obviously, a ball park nearing its centenary will over the years require changes, improvements and repairs, but I would appeal to the powers that be, please be very sensitive about changing the atmosphere in the park. I believe most Cubs fans do not need loud pop music, instant replays and the like to enjoy a (hopefully) good baseball game on the North Side.

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. - Albert Einstein

by eths on Aug 24, 2009 6:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I learned to to love baseball because I first loved going to Wrigley Field.

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. - Albert Einstein

by eths on Aug 24, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The people who bitch the loudest about modernization of Wrigley are, for the most part, people who very infrequently go to games at the ballpark

I hit about 10 to 12 games a season and have been going to Wrigley for 33 years. Any “familar face” I bump into at the ballpark agrees with the sentiment that Wrigley is long overdue for major improvements.

I’m not saying that those fans who don’t live in Chicago and/or very rarely get to the ballpark aren’t entitled to an opinion, but for crying out loud if you aren’t at the ballpark then your perspective on the sanctity of the joint is a wee bit irrelevant. Fact is the ballpark is in need of major improvements.

"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)

by BLou on Aug 24, 2009 6:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ballpark does need improvement

But your opinion and perspective is just as equal as any other Cubs fan no matter how many times a year they come ot the park.

by ak123 on Aug 24, 2009 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

There you go, being wrong again

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Aug 25, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bitching? Maybe you should reread what I actually wrote.

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. - Albert Einstein

by eths on Aug 25, 2009 2:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

then you never met me.

I go to 30-40 games/year and have since 1980. count me among the ones who thinks minor tweeks are needed, but major rehauling…not really. I am not of the ADAH generation that requires me top be entertained by scoreboards or continual stimulus being pounded at me – and my 12 year old daughter , who has sat either in my seats or the bleachers, watching a game has never complained about being bored there. In fact, the only time she went to the South Side to watch a game, she complained that it was too noisy and people there seemed to be more interested in going to play at one of the “activity” areas than watching the ballgame. I don’t buy food at the park for the most part, so concessions are not of a big concern.

Yes, some of the grandstands need to be improved. Better skyboxes to attract the high rollers. better quality seats, but these major overhauls that people are talking about, major rehabs of the grandstands, both upper and lower, new scoreboards and such…I just don’t think it is really needed.

See what old Cubs Scorecards looked like at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/scorecards.html
Also, see the Cubs 2009 schedule at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/sched2009.html

by kaseyi on Aug 25, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

They should build the Triangle building and move the front office out of the park and somehow expand the locker rooms. Other than that…I think the park is fine.

See what old Cubs Scorecards looked like at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/scorecards.html
Also, see the Cubs 2009 schedule at http://cubsbythenumbers.com/sched2009.html

by kaseyi on Aug 25, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One tries to assume the best about people...

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. - Albert Einstein

by eths on Aug 25, 2009 9:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
P272649reg_small
VERY OT: The BT Football, "Congrats to ballhawk" & "Sorry, sue369" Thread
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1
Derrick_rose_poster_by_rokasm_small
You know you want him, Get it done Jim!
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Player Picture Puzzles

Recent FanPosts

Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Dscn2381_small
Cubs 2010 2B and "the L word"
Cubswin712_small
Is there anyway we trade some of our high-priced players?
Yelloncard_small
Milton Bradley Named NL "LVP" By Joe Posnanski
Self-portrait-4_small
Crazy Idea: Rob Quinlan
10424_528302137858_173702948_31567344_967269_n_small
OT: Big Ten Football Thread, Nov. 21
Small
Grabow to sign

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

Cubs install sign boards in bleachers to block Horseshoe Casino (Budweiser) building...
This one is for you sabermetricians
A Chicagoan, Part Of Cardinals Ownership Group, Dies
Making Fun Of Tim Lincecum's Hair...
Minor League Ball Interview With Billy Beane
Castillo Rumor Won't Go Away
Minor League FA's
The Cubs Debut of Turk Wendell: A Cautionary Tale Of Classic Cubs History
Slightly OT re: Cards

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman