Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Foxy Day: Jake Fox's Slam, 5 RBI Lead Cubs To 11-4 Blowout Of Mets

All the Cubs can do each day is exactly what they did this afternoon -- come out, swing the bats, come from behind if necessary, make plays in the field... and who knows what might happen in the future?

Jake Fox hit a grand slam and drove in five runs to lead the Cubs to an 11-4 win over the Mets, and now the Cubs have a nice little four-out-of-six run going.

Whatever you think of Fox playing in the field -- and he's obviously only adequate at any of his defensive positions, and wouldn't have come near the nice running catch Sam Fuld made in the 8th after replacing him -- the man can hit, and is a fine player to have on a major league bench. Between Iowa and the Cubs this season, Fox now has 324 at-bats. In those AB, he has combined for 24 doubles, 27 HR and 92 RBI, while hitting .355/.430/.701. Most impressive, and though he won't come close to being voted Rookie of the Year, I could see giving him a third-place vote.

He'll probably play left field again tomorrow, as Lou reported in his postgame press conference that Alfonso Soriano's MRI showed only "inflammation" in his knee, no major damage, and he'll be examined tomorrow and possibly get a "shot" (I suppose Lou meant cortisone, if they still do that), and perhaps Soriano will be available by Monday.

In the meantime, Fox is more than a capable fill-in.

Star-divide

It started out as one of those games that you're glad you're the home team and have the last at-bat; Ryan Dempster got himself in trouble with a walk and a pair of hits leading to two runs in the first inning, and though the Cubs took the lead in the third (thanks in part to Dempster getting the walk back as a hitter), he gave it right back in the fourth. Dempster appeared to be trying to throw as hard as the wind was blowing today; he didn't have good command, though he did register seven strikeouts. The Cubs got a break in what could have been a Mets blowout inning in that fourth; Fernando Tatis tried to score with nobody out and two runs already in when a throw appeared to get away, but Mike Fontenot's relay cut him down. After that Dempster settled down and allowed only two more baserunners, while the offense was bailing him out in the fifth.

Nice game today for Milton Bradley, who had hits in his first three at-bats (making seven straight plate appearances he had reached base, including the four yesterday), and blasted a RBI double off the wall in the third, scoring Dempster. There were some scattered boos early in the game when Bradley was announced, but his play today turned those into cheers by the time he came up and walked in the eighth. I won't boo Bradley -- in fact, I hope he has a great September, because that would truly help the team. Aramis Ramirez also had a nice day today, with a pair of hits and RBI and a nice snag of a hot line drive by Angel Pagan. And Koyie Hill chipped in with two hits, including a RBI double; Hill's triple-slash numbers of .245/.329/.347 aren't great, but they are at least the equal of Geovany Soto's (.215/.322/.377). For now, I think Hill deserves the bulk of the playing time; Soto can get into shape and work hard and win the job back next spring.

Aaron Heilman came in and threw two scoreless innings in what might be his last appearance as a Cub. It was a bit surprising that Lou didn't leave him in to finish the game and get a save, but Sean Marshall hadn't thrown since Tuesday, so I can actually understand Lou's motivation to get Marshall an inning of work.

It was chilly today, and you could see the effects of the strong west-northwest wind in the upper deck seats. The LF upper deck, which was blocked from the wind, stayed full most of the game, but the RF upper deck, fully exposed, emptied out after the seventh inning stretch.

It was 64 degrees at game time and never got much warmer. 64 degrees is the average high temperature in Chicago on October 16. Let's hope this good Cubs play of the last two days keeps up and we have the chance to experience baseball at Wrigley Field on and after that date. Keep the faith.

Comment 408 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

First!

"Your eyes can decieve you. Don't trust them." Obi-Wan Kenobi, the first sabermetrician...

by Curtain Jerker on Aug 29, 2009 6:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't care what place we're in

It’s always fun seeing the Cubs tee off against the Mets!

by ak123 on Aug 29, 2009 6:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Al, you made the New York Times

That article someone mentioned in one of the gameday threads got picked up by the Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/sports/baseball/30santo.html?ref=baseball

by Blue Heron on Aug 29, 2009 6:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Cool!

I talked to that AP reporter early last week. Nice article about Santo.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was on Sports Illustrated's web site too

Blogger and all-around good guy Rick Kaempfer was also quoted.

by ChipSet on Aug 29, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

A bit.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

our paper picked it up for tomorrow

except i talked to the guy designing that page and asked him to put the name of the web site in.

by burncruisin on Aug 30, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Al Yellon...

…who also has a Cubs-themed Web site [at www.bleedcubbieblue.com]…"

??

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

no

its the Dubuque Telegraph Herald. I asked them to make it: Al Yellon, who runs bleedcubbieclue.com, a Cubs-centric Web site.

by burncruisin on Aug 30, 2009 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotcha

FanShot a link to it tomorrow?

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

not sure that worth a fanshot

how about if i just link it here in reply to you?

by burncruisin on Aug 30, 2009 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Works for me :)

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Happy Birthday!

Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT

by sue369 on Aug 29, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

we are still in this thing...

with 5 weeks left, 6.5 back…this isnt over

"God watches over drunks and third baseman."- Leo Durocher

by BelieveinBlue2314 on Aug 29, 2009 6:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Make that 5.5 back

after the Giants smack the Rockies tonight. If the Cubs keep the bats hot, they have good enough pitching to win a LOT of games in September. Let’s win these last two games in August first…

Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!

by DKT on Aug 29, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he puts them over the top

In all seriousness…isn’t Ellsbury hurt?

"Your eyes can decieve you. Don't trust them." Obi-Wan Kenobi, the first sabermetrician...

by Curtain Jerker on Aug 29, 2009 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you pull Harden back from waivers

if they win tomorrow, and the Rockies lose one of the next two…5.5 back is not insurmountable, especially with the Cubs’ schedule the rest of the way.

Scott Bora$ is satan.

by Canadian Cubs Fan on Aug 29, 2009 7:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd agree...

If it was just the Rockies. But there’s still SF, FL, and ATL.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 29, 2009 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Cubs have four games left with the Giants.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

In San Francisco.

Hopefully pitching match-ups will be favourable during that wraparound series. If they are, the Cubs shouldn’t have a problem knocking in runs, and maintaining that lead against the Giants’ anemic offense. Let’s not forget that Brian Wilson has a lot of shades of Gregg — he gets whacked around a lot.

I would like somebody to tell me though, how a guy from Venezuela gets a nickname of “Big Panda.”

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 29, 2009 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wikipedia is your friend

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Sandoval:

On defense, the Giants have used [Sandoval] as a starting third baseman, first baseman, and, for a short period, as a catcher for pitcher Barry Zito, who gave Sandoval the nickname Kung Fu Panda. He received the nickname after a play on September 19, 2008, where he scored a run against the Los Angeles Dodgers by jumping over the tag of catcher Danny Ardoin, scoring from second base on a single by Bengie Molina.

See also: Here.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 29, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rockies & Giants...

…have this weekend series, and then three more games back in Denver. Don’t forget LA, either; all three teams will be beating up on each other, and may allow the Cubs to sneak in. While not nearly as fun as controlling our own destiny, I’d still take that.

5.5 isn’t that much ground to make up.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 29, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Al, question:

Several of us were talking about this in the game threads.

What was going on in the bleacher section where everyone was wearing green shirts? Jake Fox’s grand slam landed in that group.

Game, set, match, life!

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Aug 29, 2009 7:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Pat and Ron talked about this

it’s some kind of group memorializing.. a doctor or something? Harry somebody. They’re raising money for research into juvenile leukemmia.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's the...

…. Henry Schueler Foundation. They do this every year for fundraising purposes.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Didn't get into the gamethreads today

but the parts I heard on the radio were good. We need to win tomorrow.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 7:13 PM CDT reply actions  

No nastiness

except when I whined about Buck and McCarver.

Happy birthday!

by chilango2 on Aug 29, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

You weren't alone

Other than Buck/McCarver complaints, the only real nastiness was when Demp gave up the lead in the 4th. The strong 5th inning turned attitudes around nicely, though.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 29, 2009 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd say

it was one of the better game threads of the year.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 29, 2009 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

How bad is Fox in Left field

Hey Al! You have a good seat for this so who is the better left fielder right now Fox or Soriano (before the cortisone injection). I’d like your assessment. I’m starting to think that Sori is the capable replacement for Fox.

by Krug on Aug 29, 2009 7:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Fox isn't a very good outfielder.

There’s no way I’d want him out there every day, and once you get to the 7th inning with a lead you have to get him out of there for Sam Fuld. (Or, Reed Johnson once he comes back.)

But the man can hit.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like Fox

is every bit as good as Sori defensively.

Hey Lou, we're long overdue.

by deadcatbounce on Aug 29, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

So what?

That’s not the question… the question is whether Soriano is good enough to justify benching Fox for him for the first 7 innings of a game. Sure, Fuld is superior and probably good enough offensively to make that switch in the later innings. But I’m not seeing how Soriano when not healthy or at the top of his game offensively is a defensible option regardless of his contract.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 29, 2009 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's a good question and...

… you’re right, the health is clearly the issue right now. Let’s see how the latest medical exam goes.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

and...

the fact that Soriano has never been a plus in leftfield anyway. Good arm, but fundamentally unsound. I don’t expect much more from Jake, if we’re contrasting two healthy options, but offensively there’s no contest… right now.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 29, 2009 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I realize that I sound something like a broken record

when it comes to Alfonso, but Soriano is a plus outfielder career-wise. Career, in the outfield, with 514 games, Soriano has a 21.5 UZR.

THIS YEAR, he has struggled mightily. Absolutely. But last year, and the year before, especially, he’s a plus defender.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

and i think his struggles this year

are due to injury. He just hasn’t looked himself this year, either in the field or at the plate.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

at least he finally had the MRI this morning. All they found was swelling. Possibly, he’ll get a cortisone shot.

Why the hell didn’t they do that in the first week of freakin’ July?

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

i know, tell me about it!

and the thing is, we all seemed to mention him hobbling around and grimacing.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

who knows

Theriot is not clutch, he's double clutch!

by jesus christos on Aug 29, 2009 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

just

making sure the record is straight, and understood.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what managers are for

to play the guys that are actually hitting the ball and driving in runs. Lou has to figure out a way to get Fuld and Fox in there because Sori is a big liability in LF and at bat. Yes he hit a GWHR yesterday, thank you very much. Where was he the other 27 days of August?

If you have a guy raking or semi-raking and another who can’t catch or hasn’t hit a lick for 3 frigging months the defense be damned! We need runs, damnit! The pitching has carried this team all year. Play Fox and figure out how to get Fuld or someone in LF. Sori’s not going to get any better this year, he’s been hobbling since April.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 29, 2009 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

The thing is Soriano has been terrible this year in LF. I don't think Fox could be any worse.

Soriano has something up with that knee, best to DL him and just run Fox out there.
Fox and Soriano are both major liabilities in the outfield, but one can hit and one can’t right now, you go with the guy that is hitting. He’s not the long term solution. I still have some faith that Soriano can come back and be decent if he’s healthy next year, but Fox is not the solution in LF for the future.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't want to say how poor Sori was in the field

that’s been argued and debated ad infinitum in about 206 posts lol. Personally, I think he’s horrible out there. There, I’ve said it lol

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 29, 2009 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's an objective fact that he's been bad in the field this year

You would not be correct saying that he is a bad LF overall(bad outfielder, I’ll let that slide as he probably couldn’t play Right or Center very well). He has been a very, very good LF since he moved there with the Nationals.

Also Shawn, does UZR take into account when runners don’t run on an outfielder? I never quite figured that part out.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sori in CF

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

This doesn't mean anything, but I found it humourous

That in a really, really small sample size Soriano had a decent UZR in CF. he’s not any good in center probably, but he was off to a decent start in 2007.
Again this means nothing I just get a little chuckle and I just saw that while I was looking up other stuff on Soriano’s fangraphs page.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

All stats have their limitations

UZR’s is that it needs a large sample size to be an accurate predictor of value. Outfielders see fewer plays than infielders, and need a correspondingly larger sample size to normalize their UZR. Sure, you can run a player’s UZR in CF based on 15 plays, but to use that to predict anything would be foolhardy at the very least.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right,

Which is why I said this:

This doesn’t mean anything

and this
Again this means nothing

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Skimming bites me in the rear again

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 4:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's no problem

I do that all the time as well as replying to the wrong message. I’m very good at the last one.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 4:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

This year I really don't care about his career stats in LF

I see what I see on the field and I don’t like it. He will never be Billy Williams but you can live with him in LF when he’s hitting. He quit hitting in mid May. Enough of waiting for one of his hot streaks. Do you know how many games we have lost because of that? We can’t calculate it, most likely, but I think you get my meaning.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 30, 2009 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't want to get into this again.

But your eyes aren’t what you should be trusting to evaluate defense unless you are scout. To which I would ask, why are you on this site?

Anyways he’s cost the team about (-8.7 UZR) -8.7 runs this season in the field so that’s almost a win but not quite. (.87 of a win).

You can calculate it with some degree of accuracy. It’s not the exact, but it’s pretty damn good.

Overall he’s cost the team about half a win this season. That’s terrible. A good WAR would be 2 or something.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fine. I've never looked at UZR, WAR or anything like those.

And if you say he’s cost the Cubs a half a win, I have to take the numbers word for it. But in that vein, for people to say that Fox would be more of a liability is ok, too. Maybe Sori doesn’t cost the team that badly as a defender, ok. But his AB’s have, along with others. I don’t care if Sori is slightly better than another in LF, if the other guy is driving in runs, I’ll roll the dice with the defense for the sake of runs at this point and hope we actually get some leads so I can play my defensive guys.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 30, 2009 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's fine, but you don't even need to go to the offense vs. defense thing

Fox is the right player to play right now and Soriano needs to be on the DL.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Frigging Manny is a butcher in LF but he hits a ton. Defense be damned!

It’s not like the Cubs have Murderer’s Row, they need every hit and run they can. If Soto and others were playing at last year’s numbers, NBD. But they aren’t and haven’t all year. You have to go with the hot hand when it’s hot, period.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 30, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know what happens when the #1 line isn't scoring in hockey?

They get shuffled or moved to #2 or #3 within a few games, not 2/3 of a season.

Why do managers like Lou and Dusty play guys that are scuffling for weeks on end and not sit them or move them down and get the guys hitting where they can do damage?

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 30, 2009 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know I doubt Ovie's, Crosby, Toews, Malkin, or Zetterburg

Are getting moved down a line in 2 or 3 games. But the thing in Hockey is even teh second line and third line plays a lot. What’s an average shift? 45 seconds- 2 minutes at the longest? Very different sport, not really applicable.

The difference between not starting in hockey and not starting in baseball is huge.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hockey lines and defensive pairings are *far* more about chemistry than baseball lineups

The only thing that really compares in baseball is a double-play combo or pitcher who has a personal catcher.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 30, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was trying to make a point that

when you aren’t scoring, you have to do something. Waiting and hoping for a guy to turn it around over 2 weeks in a long baseball season is normal, but 3 months? C’mon now.

Ok, I overstated that players get moved down in lines like that, but the coaches do shuffle lines constantly, and are always trying to get the right combination. Sure, they have to deal with on ice matchups, but so does a baseball manager when he has to match up with a pitcher. IDK, I was simply trying to point out that Lou has given a few players more than enough time to get going. If it’s due to injury then he’s got to be the guy to decide sit or play more intelligently or quickly.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 30, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

All I know is

Milton Bradley has to got be the hottest Cubs batter right now.

Saturday
3-4 with 1 RBI, 1 BB, 2 runs scored
Friday
3-3 with 1 BB, 2 runs scored
Thursday
0-5 (blah)
Wednesday
1-4 with 3 RBI, 1 BB, 2 runs scored
Tuesday
4-4 with 1 RBI, 1 BB, 2 runs scored
Monday
Day Off
Sunday
0-1 (didn’t start)

That’s 11 for 21. That’s an over .500 batting average, my friends.

For the past 7 days, his OPS is 1.491. For the last 14, it’s .960. And I’m pretty sure those numbers from Baseball-reference.com doesn’t cover today yet. His OBP for the past week is .550, his SLG .941!!!!!

And some of you guys want to trade him?

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 7:53 PM CDT reply actions  

He's thriving in the 2nd spot

And it suits him quite well. Still wish Dome was leading off, but MB seems to have cemented his place in the order.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 29, 2009 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

hed be even better in the leadoff spot

but that might be my antiFPSM side talking

Theriot is not clutch, he's double clutch!

by jesus christos on Aug 29, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, I still want to trade him.

But I hope he keeps hitting this way the rest of the season.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Milton Bradley leads the team

in OBP, yet you still want to trade him? That makes no sense whatsoever.

by Neifi Puppy on Aug 29, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

He leads the team in distractions, too.

Let’s see: .398 OBP; Ramirez at .391, Fukudome at .390. Not much of a difference there, is there?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just don't think you can look at the number of teams

he’s played on over the last few years, and say that his attitude, and the fact that despite putting up decent to great numbers, the teams rarely want him back for a second season.

The last time Bradley played for the same team two straight years was 2002, and 2003

by Illicat on Aug 29, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your using circumstantial evidence to prove your point.

Just because teams did get rid of him does not mean it actually had an effect on play. I’d guess that the reason most teams didn’t want him was because of injury history not his attitude.
You could, but you’re not providing any evidence on to support your claim. At the point where this Clubhouse Chemistry stuff is a complete unknown I’ll take the objective data that says he’s worth keeping.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

you'd really pay 10 mil for a .260 average

and 35 rbis? I hope you’re not one that was calling for Kosuke’s deportation last year, because that would be quite contradictory.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wasn't calling for Kosuke's deportation

And again is his the 70s where we measure value by avg and rbi. He’s been worth 6.5 Million dollars this year. That is pretty damn close to the truth given the strength of the statistic Wins Above Replacement. It’s not capturing his value with 100% accuracy, but it’s not a stretch at all to say 95%+.

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=369&position=OF#value

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

*Is this the 70s?

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Both explanations the injury one and the attitude one are completely unsupported

and could be equally true. There’s no point in making personal decisions with a type of evidence (this nebulous attitude stuff) where such a large number of things have an equal chance of being true.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

well, at least one injury

was a direct result of the attitude. so, I tend to think that goes hand in hand.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

no

one injury was the result of being flung to the ground by his manager.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

and why did that even occur, drew?

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is also irrelevant

Getting hurt arguing is one of the rarest things ever.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

that's not irrelevant.

that lends to my argument of him being a distraction.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's also irrelevant because your making one incident

into a trend.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's 2x irrelevant

One that’s not the point. The point is I could claim that Milton Bradley’s in ability to get clutch RBIs are the reason teams didn’t want him and could be right. This is about perceived perception.

Do you realize how absurd this whole conversation is? We’re arguing about getting rid of a player because of how we think team’s perceive a player.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

because his manager

wasn’t being careful.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I remember that incident, I was watching with wide eyes and that umpire blew the call...

in an important game and MB blew up. He was passionate for winning… which I can totally dig. Granted sometimes he gets in his own way, but all in all I’ll take it- we need some more fire… some more dragons!

by smash! on Aug 30, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

That too.

I have never seen a manger fling a player to the ground like that, or have I since. I haven’t seen any of Bradley’s past managers do it and I have not since (and he’s had to be held back by each one of those managers).

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's irrelevant. You missed the entire point of my post

The opinion “injuries are why he moves around so much” and “attitude is why he moves around so much” have an equal chance of being right and there is no use making personal decisions on something that is so utterly imprecise and widely varying.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

fair enough.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I stand by my opinion from last offseason

Bobby Abreu would look good in cubbie blue.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Abreu is basically Milton with more speed

he still wouldn’t have provided what we needed. Dunn, or Ibanez are the only ones who were available who would have.

And please, stat guys, spare me the “Dunn would have cost us more games than he would have won us” I’ve seen the stats, and those kind of predictors don’t take situations into account.

by Illicat on Aug 29, 2009 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

abreu so far this year:

.301/12 HR/85 RBI. not to mention the 27 stolen bases. I do agree he has much more speed than Milton, but he brings so much more. he has also played no fewer than 151 games.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh, and he's only making $5 mil this year

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

so

is Bradley.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

and he has 50 less rbi

and a much lower average.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

he scuffled at the beginning of the year.

Abreau has two months this season hitting well below .250. One of them is right now.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Paying too much for that OBP

Yes he is the hottest hitter on team, right now but for what the Cubs are paying him they could have gotten Dunn (less even) and had a more feared hitter in the line-up. I’d call their defense a wash.

His price is too high, hopefully Bradley tears it the rest of the season, that will increase his trade value in the offseason to a AL team.

The sun will shine in '69

by gaclaudy on Aug 29, 2009 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their not paying him too much

In fact they are underpaying him by 1.5 million dollars based on his accrued value this season.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know what's really funny

Milton Bradley is probably the most talked about player on the team right now. He has almost become the face of the team, either you like him or hate him, sorta like A-Rod, Sheffield, or Puljos.

The sun will shine in '69

by gaclaudy on Aug 29, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

The thing is I don't want to talk about him.

He ’s not even in the top 10 of reasons why this team is losing this year.

There are many more important things to talk about in terms of what is going/ went wrong. Fontenot can’t hit, Soto is too fat/ can’t hit/ injured, Soriano is having an awful year, Ramirez’s injury, starting pitching injuries, Carlos Marmol, Kevin Gregg, Aaron Heilman, Aaron Miles, and then maybe Bradley’s defense.
His hitting has not been the problem.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

this season looked like it was in the tank early because

Ramirez’s injury and Soriano’s extended slump/nagging injury. I don’t think you can blame the pitching, not even Gregg/Marmol/Heilman. Sure, they’ve blown their fair share of leads, but no more than normally get blown over the course of a season. Even with the injuries to the starting pitching, guys from the minors stepped up. If Zambrano hadn’t gotten hurt, would Randy Wells be where he is?

by burncruisin on Aug 30, 2009 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I sort of wondered to myself...

… if he isn’t getting off on the “nobody believes in me, they all hate me, i’ll show them” mentality he’s been displaying. Maybe its driving his great play over the last week or so.

Follow me on twitter @andrewjstone.

by AndrewJStone on Aug 30, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

A wash?

Milton is a considerably better defender than Dunn.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

their defense

is absolutely NOT a wash. Milton Bradley, in a year that started with a bad fielding stretch, has a UZR of -1.8. Career, he’s got a UZR of 27.9.

This year, for the Nats, Adam Dunn has an OF UZR of -20.7. At first base, he has an UZR of -7.5.

His career UZR at first base is -14.8. His career UZR in the outfield… wait, I need to bold this.

-93.5

NEGATIVE NINETY THREE POINT FIVE.

To suggest that their defense is a wash is utterly uninformed, so hopefully you’re more informed now. I would argue that Adam Dunn loses as many games as he wins.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

lol you know how much UZR means

who would you rather have defensively, Hanley Ramirez or Theriot? Ramirez= -23.9, theriot = 6.5

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol your not putting that in context

Bradley, in his career, is a less talented hitter than Dunn, but it’s not that big of a gap.

Hanley Ramirez is a noted terrible fielder who will likely have to move to centerfield and hits like gangbusters. Theriot’s offensive ability it nowhere near, not even remotely close (over .100 points of wOBA) to Hanley’s. Hanley is worth 7.0 wins already because of how good his bat is at a premium position. You can be good while having a defense, but you have to hit like a god.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

i said once again
who would you rather have defensively? who would you rather have defensively? who would you rather have defensively? who would you rather have defensively? who would you rather have defensively? who would you rather have defensively?

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Theriot not even close.

lol your going to say Hanley aren’t you. Please go talk to a scout about this since you won’t believe the statistics.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

first of all learn to read.

secondly, i think most scouts would say that they would take Hanley. Have you even talked to a scout in your life?

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

nope.

i didn’t say “please go talk to a scout about this since you won’t believe in statistics.” You should probably talk to a scout before you make an assumption about scouts and statistics.

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol


You haven’t talked to scouts. I haven’t either, but “Scouts” are just a code word for biased subjective analysis. If you talked to an actual scout, they’ll tell you Theriot is better. I’m really quite sure about this.

An experienced scout could not possibly confuse an above average SS with one of the worst in baseball.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

nice pic.

scouts & UZR = match made in heaven. I’d still rather have Hanley btw.

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agreed with you on this

Despite his defense, he is a much better player than Theriot. Much, much, much, much better.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

you're using the wrong numbers.

Those are heavily slanted by Ramirez’s 2007 season, which was abysmal according to UZR.

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Aug 29, 2009 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah it's a pretty clear distinction

That’s 2.82 wins he’s chopping off of his offensive value because of his defense. He is a DH, there is no doubt about it.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was talking about Dunn.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, then yes.

Three-loss butcher it is.

I recommend that as our new nickname for Adam Dunn: the 3-loss butcher.

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Aug 30, 2009 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like it

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 30, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

actually, Bradley's making $9M this year, when you count the $4M signing bonus

From Cot’s

signed by Chicago Cubs as a free agent 1/6/09
$4M signing bonus
09:$5M, 10:$9M, 11:$12M

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you wanna look at the whole deal when it's over you can add that 9 mil back and evaluate.

But on a yearly basis the question is whether he earned his salary. The signing bonus is not payed to him for services rendered or yet to be rendered it’s for signing. His salary is for his services and that’s 5 mil.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

c'mon Buzz

do you really think Bradley would have agreed to a contract that only pays him $5M the first year if the $4M signing bonus wasn’t part of it?

That’s just the games agents and GMs play and it was probably a cash flow incentive for Bradley.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

He probably wouldn't have taken the deal but his value vs. salary is still the same.

He’s still earned his salary this year. He wasn’t payed to produce like a 9mil player this year, he was payed to produce like a 5 mil player. Normally, he would be better than this, but he hasn’t.
Oh well, stuff happens.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah Buzz... you're the gift that keeps giving...

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've tonned down the personal attacks

Just cause you veil yours in ambiguity doesn’t mean their any less of a personal attack

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

but you don't

count that as part of his salary. At best, you run that $4m over the life of the contract. So that would be $1.3M extra per year. So are you saying he hasn’t performed as a $6.3m player? Because the statistics tell you he is. I certainly think he is.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fine I can agree with that.

Because it’s not assigned to the first year the split evenly over years makes sense.

Fair enough.

I keep getting away from my main point. Bradley hasn’t been the problem this year. It shouldn’t matter what they’re paying him he has played adequately enough not to be one of the major reasons this team sucks. He hasn’t played well enough to carry this team or be main contributor, but he certainly shouldn’t be the focus of the fans ire.
He has been part of the reason this team hasn’t played well, but as I’ve said before he’s not even in the top 10.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

look at the numbers, drew - does common sense not enter the picture here?

Do you really think he signs a contract like that ($5M/$9M/$12M) without the $4M signing bonus?

Let me backtrack a bit and state that I base my reasoning here on the premise that he gets the entire $4M signing bonus this year (2009). I think that’s how signing bonuses work.

So add the $4M signing bonus to his first year “salary” of $5M, doesn’t that equate to getting paid $9M this year, and shouldn’t that be how you judge him?

If on the other hand, the signing bonus is prorated, i.e. paid, over the length of the contract, then I agree with your numbers.

Either way, I’m not questioning his performance relative to his contract at all. I think he’ll be well worth the $30M for the 3 yrs. I just think it’s a bit misleading to keep trotting out the “he’s only getting paid $5M this year” argument out there.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know

if he signs the contract or not. But it’s a bonus for SIGNING. Not performing.

I’m willing to prorate the worth of the signing across the three years — so fine. $6.3m for the first year. He’s still performing at that level.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow...

I cannot hope to compete in the face of such steadfastness and literal interpretations. So before I succumb to the Einstein definition of insanity, I shall make a less-than graceful retreat, shaking my head the whole way…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see

why that’s not a reasonable interpretation.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a semantics argument...

There’s not really a “right” answer.

But regardless, the $4 million is part of the contract. You can’t not count it somewhere. You can argue whether it should be prorated over the 3 years (meaning he’s making $6.333 million this year) or you can count it as part of this year (meaning $9 million). But ignoring it is inappropriate.

And I actually agree that he’s performing at about the value of his contract this year (slightly above if you say $6.3 million, slightly below if you say $9 million).

by SouthernCub on Aug 30, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are we still in the 70s?

Why are people so hung up on AVG and RBIs? It seems that fans/beat reporters/broadcasters are the last to realize that those statistics became much less meaningful 10 years ago. Those statistics aren’t indicative of value nor are they predictive.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

say what you will. and whatever decade we happen to be in

I’ll take a .300 hitter with 100 RBI’s any day.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

A .300 hitter with 100 RBI is probably good, yes.

But you don’t really know how good given just those numbers. In 1958 Mickey Mantle batted .304 and had 97 RBI. He got on base at a .447 clip and slugged .592, but had no more RBI opportunities than the average player. In 1985 Jim Rice batted .293 and drove in 103 runs. His OBP and SLG were each about .100 lower than Mantle’s season, but he raked in RBI because he had so many more opportunities. Which is not to say Rice had a bad season or that you wouldn’t “take it” — though you might not take it over, say, what Derrek Lee is producing this year.

These results courtesy of a b-r play index search — it looks like there are more extreme examples than this on the bad end but I can’t see them because of the way the search was limited (I’m not a subscriber). While it appears that it’s rare to hit .300, drive in 100 runs, and have a legitimately bad season, it’s not rare to miss those criteria and have a better season than Rice in ’85, or to exceed them greatly and have a worse season than Mantle in ’58.

by aldimond on Aug 30, 2009 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

and what stats are?

not being snarky – just curious as to what you think the better stats would be.

Then my follow-up question would be why aren’t those stats the ones they put up on the tv screen or scoreboard when those players come up to bat?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are a lot of better statistics to understand offensive value.

About the TV thing. It’s because a majority of the viewers wouldn’t understand it and it would take away from ratings. Some people want to watch baseball with their AVG/HR/RBIs, but that doesn’t mean those stats are good at indicating value. Just because something is done on a popular level doesn’t mean it’s accurate

I’m going to list a bunch of stats that are better than RBI:

OPS
OBP
SLG
wOBA (weighted on-base average)
EqR (equivalency runs)
EqA (equivalency average)
WAR (Wins Above Replacement)
Offensive Win Shares
and quite a few more.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

To answer the follow-up

most of it is historical, and the fact that most of the “improved” statistics have only been developed over the last two decades…. or it is only until then that people realized their value.

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Aug 29, 2009 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol Milton with more speed

Do you know just how bad Abreu is in RF. He is soooo slow it’s unbelievable. His defense in RF is an atrocity -5 runs in the field this year.

And Illicat I enjoy your unsupported claims about stats you clearly don’t understand. Care to delve into the math and prove why instead of just baseless claims that stats lie?

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

he's very servicable in RF

not to mention he has a cannon of an arm.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because I know you won't believe me when I post his UZR because it disagrees with your point.

And I know you think scouts and stats guys always disagree. Go ask Keith Law (he’s a scout not a statistician btw) what he thinks or someone who is a scout and have him verify it is a legit scout talking and then I’ll believe you.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

have you even seen him play?

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

He doesn't actually watch baseball...

Just spends his time on fangraphs.com all day.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

i can write one up for you, if you'd like

living in the new york area, i’ve seen him play quite a bit.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, I have seen him play and he's slow and old.

You and I both aren’t scouts. To suggest that you can do what a scout can in terms of analysis is either the height of ignorance or the height of arrogance

2 Years ago I could have written up a ridiculous scouting report about Ryan Theriot’s defense and I would have been laughed at by any scout. It turns out Theriot is actually a good defender at SS.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

It turns out Theriot is actually a good defender at SS.

i agree, theriots a GG snub imo. never double clutches and has great range and a great SS arm

Theriot is not clutch, he's double clutch!

by jesus christos on Aug 29, 2009 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would love to

move Theriot in a trade next year

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or move him to second base where he'd be even more valuable

Why give up a good defensive, cost controlled SS? Does he have attitude problems too?

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Relax

did I mention a attitude? Getting a little testy I see

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

See that's the problem

You miss what the scouting reports (like John Dewan’s fielding bible says) about him. You are watching a game as a fan. You are not a scout.
His assets are he’s great going back on pop ups and has decent ability to get balls going to his right and has a very quick release.

His flaws are he has trouble with balls up the middle and has a weak arm.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

having a strong arm is important for a SS

dlee saves many of theriots bad throws, thats something stats doesnt show

Theriot is not clutch, he's double clutch!

by jesus christos on Aug 29, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Uggh, picks are factored in my friend

Over a large sample size that noise will clear up.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Theriot a good defender at SS?

Puke. This is something that you don’t need fangraphs for.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

It has been mentioned

by Angel hitters, Kendrick, Morales and Aybar how much they appreciate Abreu presence in the lineup and in the clubhouse. I read this by one of there beat reporters on MLB.com. I also heard this on the MLB extra innings package there announcer, Rex Hudler, for what it is worth.
 I still think The Cubs should try to trade Bradley. Never happen no one will take that contract for OBP of .390 and 35 RBI’s

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lineup protection is a myth

A player, given a large enough sample size will hit just about his career norm regardless of who hits behind or ahead of him.

The players quotes about how good it is to have abreu in the lineup is nothing. Are they scouts? Are they stats guys? No, they play baseball. Just because you play baseball doesn’t mean you know everything about it (see Joe Morgan).

When players, beat reporters, and broadcasters are your sources that’s a problem.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh really?

So Aramis’ impact on the rest of the lineup when he was out, that was just a figment of our imagination? And when he came back, that positive impact was… mythical?

I’ll take a teammates opinion of Abreu over a “stat guy” any day of the week. Because they, you know, PLAY BASEBALL. There’s another element to the game besides just numbers.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure that's what he's talking about

lineup protection usually means that a pitcher will treat a batter differently because of who is batting behind him — because Rami bats behind Lee, Lee doesn’t get bad pitches, because you’d rather have him put the ball in play and maybe make an out then have to face Rami with the man on. It’s one of the things that makes a batter like Bradley so important — he’s able to take walks and get on base even in front of Lee.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 30, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Any stats to support that Abreu is slow?

Got a 40 time? Or is that just a baseless claim?

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd.

Exactly how I feel. Thanks for expressing it better than I could.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Small sample size...

He’s SLG .413 for the season. But he’s a good #2 hitter, hopefully for another team next year.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 29, 2009 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

And unless there are good prospects coming back,

JH will hang up the phone.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's underperformed yes.

but don’t use the “he’s supposed to be a middle of the lineup guy”. His value is what is value is regardless of how he gets it. 1.4 wins above replacement is 1.4 wins above replacement.

It doesn’t matter where he hits in the lineup, it matters that he’s produced. Not to the level they expected him to, but more than what they payed him for.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

"It doesn't matter where he hits... he's produced..."

Forgive me if I’m mistaken, but aren’t the 3-5 spots in the lineup (where he’s hit) supposed to be big RBI spots? He’s got 36 RBI, and is hitting .230 with RISP. Not exactly what I’d call “production” from a middle of the order run-producer.

Is he a decent #2 hitter? Sure. But to say he’s produced anywhere he’s hit, is just not the case.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

No question

If the Cubs can get out from under the commitment to his contract, then they should do that for sure. The Cubs can find a player who can provide his production with fewer distractions, less attitude, more consistency, more reliability… and many, many less dollars. Bobby Abreu shows how paying a player such as Bradley for multiple years should be out of a smart GM’s playbook… at least one that doesn’t want to get fired.

And it’s not like the Cubs really know how to utilize him anyway… or pretty much anyone else on their roster. This isn’t all Milton’s fault (except the attitude, injuries and distractions), but if someone other team wants him, they can have him without any objection from me.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 29, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Totally disagreed.

Now your are blaming the rest of the team’s hitting and pitching woes on Milton Bradley?!?! Give me a bloody break. I suppose its Milton’s fault the economy went south.

MLB has an entire history of players with attitudes that don’t meat your lofty standards and yet they still win championships.

Your argument holds no merit at all.

by Neifi Puppy on Aug 29, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

it does hold merit because it's my opinion.

And, for what it’s worth, go look at Milton’s track record and the teams he was on. You look at Texas, who had a decent year last year (and he was an all star). They figured they were 1-2 years away from making a playoff run. Don’t you find it odd that they didn’t bring him back?

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

last 7 deals have been for one year. To me, that’s a HUGE red flag.

"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly

by ambrosiadreams on Aug 29, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm just going to start making one line posts to these types of posts:

Psuedo-Pyschology

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

sorry *Psychology

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Milton could have played another year for the Rangers

but he chose the Cubs because they offered more money

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just searched mlbtraderumors for something about it

It seems that he was offered arbitration and declined.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

And if I'm the Rangers...

…his bat would have been quite helpful in this duel with the Halos, and, by extension, the Red Sox.

Rickey has spoken. Keep the Athletics in Bump City.

by LeSaboteur on Aug 29, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

not odd at all.

Texas had a glut of outfielders

by burncruisin on Aug 30, 2009 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not Milton's fault the economy went south.

That’s Theriot’s fault, for hitting all those deep fly balls, getting lucky on cheap home runs in May, then when the luck ran out in June watching his ISO/SLG fall back to career norms without improvement in his normal areas of strength. The collapse of Theriot’s home run bubble sent shockwaves through the economy, destroying the slugging default swap markets. Derrek Lee and Jake Fox set up a program to buy out the troubled power assets, but much of the power ultimately fell to short middle infielders on other teams (see Hill, Aaron).

by aldimond on Aug 30, 2009 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right

I mean Milton injured Lilly, Dempster, and Zambrano. He injured Geo and ripped Rami’s shoulder out in a fit of rage. He pushed Soriano into that wall to injure his knee and he scared Carlos Marmol into not being able to throw strikes. He made Lou not be as good a manager.

Milton Bradley did all of this which is why the Cubs are having a bad season.

Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.

by nji232 on Aug 29, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

prove it.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Think of it as the “DeRosa Trade Proces”. Trade him after a good season and hope for the best return.

The sun will shine in '69

by gaclaudy on Aug 29, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why's it always gotta be a *black* cloud?

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 29, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

latent racism

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 29, 2009 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

SWL do you believe that

racism exists in America? and do you believe that racism can be racism if it’s not the n-word or black guy as monkey reference?
Good racial humor is one thing, that mocks stereotypes. Bad racial humor perpetuates them and just makes fun of other races (see Carlos Mencia)
Cause I know your joking and from anyone else I’d pass this up, but I think you don’t take the possibility of racism that doesn’t jump up and hit you in the face seriously.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know racism exists...

but sometimes the people who are always looking for it are worse than the actual racists.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 29, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, pretending it doesn't exist is always worse.

In what way can over analyzing racism bring as much harm as ignoring it.

Potentially ignoring it lets it happen, pointing it out where it isn’t just makes people mad. I’ll take the chance of making a few people mad at me rather than just letting it go and letting it continue.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok fair enough. That's the Jessie Jackson/Al Sharpton argument as I feel Jackson and Sharpton find valid examples of racism and then handle them poorly. I don't buy that argument as racism never become non-serious.

But I feel like it isn’t a rare thing in this world and when reasonable people point it out they rarely are doing it in a way that makes people immune to it. Some if it might be subtle and when you find racism rarely are you pointing it out incorrectly. I feel like it would take a lot of incorrect cries for people to stop listening to racism

The only time your going to run into this is benign racism. Stuff that doesn’t do much damage, but doesn’t make things better either. Saying nothing here isn’t that big of a deal.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Whatever SWL you can stuff our fingers in your ears

and go along on your merry way. I really don’t care to convince you anymore.
You are incapable of taking anything seriously, there’s really no point in arguing with you because it just becomes one meaningless quip after another. That’s fine when it comes to useless things like baseball or baseball statistics, but when it comes to something serious like racism or injustice there it’s just absurd.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

to it SWL, I beat you

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

HOW DARE YOU!

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Aug 29, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

And that was the plural, too

How big are your ears, anyway? Even if we were all in a BK commercial, I think that would get uncomfortable after a while.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 29, 2009 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

* your

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Racism and injustice

are not topics to be discussed on a baseball blog anyway. To dismiss these subjects with quips is called defusing a possibly incendiary topic before it overruns a baseball discussion.

"Was you ever punched in the face five hundred times a night? It stings after a while." ~Rocky Balboa

by Goodie1969 on Aug 30, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

This.

Someday we'll go all the way...

by CubsBullsBears on Aug 30, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

lol

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

If only

he had shown up at all the first four months of the season.

by qccub on Aug 29, 2009 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's amazing what two wins can do

for people’s attitudes….I love it

"Brant Brown...DROPS THE BALL!!!!"

by cubswgnrocks on Aug 29, 2009 8:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Driving home from

New Hampshire, taking my oldest daughter to college, a senior, goodness I am getting old.
 Had the Mets radio team, Howie Rose, Wayne Hagen, good announcers. They mentioned about Dempster child, also mention how Santo specifically sought out David Wright to talk to him about getting hit in the head. Howie Rose talked about how Santo got hit in the cheek bone in 1966, eye swelled shut instantly. Then Santo sat out for 5 games and the first game back hit a homerun on his first AB to keep a 28 game hitting streak alive
 I thought for the Mets announcers to come up with that information was pretty neat.
 Just keep on winning Cubs, who knows what can happen. I still recall the Mets having a 7 game lead with 17 to go and blowing it, so funny things happen in this game.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 8:11 PM CDT reply actions  

The Mets announcers are good

Wayne Hagin used to do White Sox games with John Rooney, then did Cardinals games for a few years. Ironically, Rooney replaced Hagin on Cards games.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 29, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Cards essentially screwed Hagin

when Rooney tired of another “White Sox Winner” and got the job he coveted.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 29, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know I shouldn't say this

Ronnie Woo-Woo makes me laugh! How long has been coming to Cubs games? I seem to remember him from 30 years ago. Part of what I enjoy about going to a Cubs game is the characters.

Ronnie Woo-Woo is a character and is certainly a part of the texture that goes with being at Cubs games.

I love watching the Cubs during the season and dread watching them in the playoffs.

by Cub Fan Mike on Aug 29, 2009 8:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Oh, God, no

I love characters as much as the next guy, but not this guy. He makes my flesh crawl.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 29, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're not going to make any friends here by saying that.

Particularly me. That person is a self-promoter, not a Cubs fan. He’s all about him.

Enough. Don’t mention him again.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Aug 29, 2009 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Uh...

You don’t like someone and thus no one is allowed to mention his name? Not that I disagree with your assessment, but telling someone not to mention him again seems harsh.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I want to keep Milton

He’s go the best hitting eye on the team and is an OBP machine. He’s great at driving the ball to the gap and plays solid defense for the most part. He’s one of the league’s best switch hitters. He can hit for power.

His skill set is very useful, and I think that this whole year (this week in particular) has taught him a lot about how to handle things. If he can learn to not to give the media so much to work with and be less uptight around the fans (like when he bowed after catching that fly ball), I think that things will cool down and he can be a popular and productive member of this team.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:25 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd like to

keep him too and especially agree with your second paragraph.

Recipe for Disaster;
C'mon Cubs, hurry up and blow this so I can relax.
by Bluekoolaide on July22, 2009 3:08 PM CDT

by sue369 on Aug 29, 2009 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really hope this year has taught him some things...

I hope so because I think he’s a good player that can help the team, and because I have a lot of sympathy for what he’s faced from the media and some fans. He seems to be an extreme introvert, and dealing with the fans, media, and even teammates will always be hard for him. I am very introverted myself and have a bit of experience performing in front of crowds that are yelling at me (fortunately on a much smaller scale than MLB). I’ve never even had to deal with a hostile crowd… sometimes crowds that want to help are just as bad. I don’t think Bradley will ever be a smash with the media. Probably the best we can hope for is something like Frank Thomas (remember his problems, for a time?). But to get even to that point Bradley will have to grow a thicker skin toward the fans, and be more shrewd about what he says. Starting next season at the plate the way he’s finished this one would go a long way, too.

(When Thomas was with the As I lived in the Bay Area, and it seemed like everyone loved him there — I think getting away from all the people that he’d sparred with over the years helped him, and he really was more mature by that time and willing to accept his role and his limitations. At the same time… say what you will about Oakland baseball fans, they mostly save the booing and heckling for opposing players. That goes a long way towards making a guy feel at home.)

by aldimond on Aug 30, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

i want to keep milton if he keeps hitting like this

but i think you can find another hitter like this without the distractions that come along

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 9:27 PM CDT reply actions  

OBP of .390, 11 HRS, and 35 RBI's

for 10 Million, sure I could find somebody, give me a offseason like Hendry had.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can't really.

The RBIs are irrelevant. You just don’t find a ton of people with .390 OBPs for 5 Mil.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

The obession

of OBP, and driving in runs don’t mean a thing. Great I guess Fox’s 5 RBI’s had nothing to do with the win today?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

What he means is that RBI don't reflect solely on you

It’s very much a team-dependent stat. If three guys hadn’t gotten on base, it would have been only one RBI.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

But it still would've been the game winner.

"Was you ever punched in the face five hundred times a night? It stings after a while." ~Rocky Balboa

by Goodie1969 on Aug 30, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

RBIs are two wide sweeping of a stat.

RBI assume that the person driving in the run did all the work to make that run come in. The way you are using RBI assume is that the frequency upon which player comes to the plate with men on base is under his control and what type of hit he has when there are men on base is under his control. There are way, way, way too many other factors with RBI to be able to extrapolate that statistic to a players production level.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure it is dependent

on other players I get that. However give me a guy who comes through in that spot. April through mid July, Bradley, Soriano, Soto, Fontenot did not step it up and drive in runs in situations they were needed. Earlier part of the year Bradley was more concerned on taking a walk then trying to drive in a run or even drive the ball.
 This teams failure has not been OBP, their failure is to drive in runs in clutch spots, 2 outs with runners in scoring position, bases loaded and less than two outs, runner on third with less than two outs. I have seen enough games this year to realize that Lee and Ramirez are our two best hitters because they get the hits when the Cubs need them. Ask yourself would you want Bradley up with the game on the line to drive a run home or Lee/Ramirez?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Aug 29, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

No he's not

But his defense would make his value equal if not slightly less than Ramirez if he was having a normal defensive year.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

There is no evidence that Bradley is more concerned about walking than hitting in the clutch.

Just because a player is really patience doesn’t mean he “doesn’t want to drive in runs”. That is just fairy tale type stuff right there. Clutch is a very minimal skill that has such minimal effect on the game it makes little difference.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

no

you want Bradley up BEFORE THEM. SO SOMEONE IS ON BASE TO BE DRIVEN IN.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

ironically

one of those guys that Jake Fox drove in?

Milton Bradley. Because he’s got AMAZING OBP.

He scored twice today. Twice yesterday. Twice on wednesday. Twice on tuesday. It’s because HE GETS ON BASE. EIGHT RUNS IN FIVE DAYS.

"I’m not going to allow Al Yellon to flush this thing down the crapper without a fight." (BLOU)
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Aug 29, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

$9M - see above

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Aug 29, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

you asked if i can find a hitter that gets on base as often and plays adequete defense

Sam fuld is a better defender than bradley and obviously bradley is a better hitter. For the short amount of time fuld has been in the big leagues, he has showed the ability to take walks and get on base.

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, for the short amount of time he has been in the big leagues

Meaning that it’s a small sample size and we don’t know what would happen if he was a full-time starter. I really do like Sam Fuld, but I’d rather put Milton out there. Sam is perfect as a defensive replacement and as platoon guy, though.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Driving in runs?

so situational hitting? The statistic that has no consistent trend from year to year? Yeah I’ll bank on that one. Instead of wOBA, OPS, OBP, SLG, and UZR. I’ll focus on who drives in runs

Again are you guys stuck in the 70s. No teams use RBI as a determining factor in baseball decisions. No GM will pick a player because of RBIs alone. This statistic has limited usefulness. It tells you a little about about someone’s ability to “drive in runs” but SLG would tell you that better.

Monopoly, twenty-one, checkers, and chess...

by Buzz on the Moon on Aug 29, 2009 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

RBIs and SLG go hand in hand

lol and yeah the rbi stat is still quite useful these days

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I'm just saying

Having more RBI than someone doesn’t mean anything in terms of how good a player you are. Mike has more RBI despite the fact that Milton is hitting roughly fifty points higher than him and has a full one hundred-point advantage in OBP.

Hell, Jason Giambi had 40 RBI this season despite hitting .193. RBI is a really awful way to determine someone’s true value.

by Pre on Aug 29, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

which season would you rather have

104 rbis, .285 average, .342 obp, .483 slg or 77 rbis, .321 avg, .436 obp, .563 slg, my opinion, i’d rather take the first.

COOL BEANS!

by lexmarklover on Aug 29, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions