Comparing the 2009 Cardinals and Cubs going forward
So, BLou's post got me to thinking about a side-by-side comparison of the Cardinals and Cubs - how close are these teams really? As I broke things down, I was surprised where I came down on a few things.
One of the interesting things about this race is that both teams actual records match their Pythagorean Records (click here for explanation of "Pythagorean Records").
Corner Infield - Albert Pujols is the best player in baseball, but I'm not sure the gap between him and DLee is wider this year than the gap between Aramis Ramirez and Mark DeRosa. After all, since May, Derrek has been hitting .321/.398/.605 (he's in incline, you know). I thought this would be an area the Cards would win, but Aramis is tearing the cover off the ball and I'm going to say it's advantage Cubs.
Middle Infield - Julio Lugo and Ryan Theriot are the same player. Fonty/Baker & Skippy/Ryan are mirror images with Fontenot playing good defense but struggling to hit and Skippy hitting but failing at defense. I like the odds that one of Mike or Jeff can step up by season's end and so say this is a push, with potential to become an advantage for the Cubs.
Catcher - Unless there's an ESPN magazine cover curse, Yadi's the "best catcher in baseball," right? Maybe not, but he's been better than Soto this year. Advantage Cards. That said, despite Geo's low AVG, he's pacing Yadi as a hitter and could come back strong. The Cubs could close this gap.
Outfield - Soriano and Ludwick strike me as very comparable players, deficient in OBP, but bringing enough to the table to have value for their teams. I'd be concerned about Rasmus breaking out, but beyond him being still shy of 23, he's also struggling with injury. So, Fukudome has the advantage over Ankiel/Rasmus. That leaves Bradley and Holliday, which I think is closer than their current stat lines suggest. That said, until Bradley starts hitting for power, you have to give the advantage to the Cards. (I really wonder if Lou needs to move Bradley to #2 in the order to try and jump start that power by making pitchers less inclined to walk Bradley and giving him better pitches to hit.)
Front of the Rotation - Carpenter, Wainwright, and Piniero are a strong front three and these Cardinals - if healthy - will enjoy a starting pitching advantage in the playoffs (if they make it). I think Harden can be as good as Carpenter, while Carpenter isn't without his own injury risks; Randy Wells compares to Piniero as you wonder how they're both doing it and if they can keep it up. That said, I'd rather have Carpenter/Piniero and it's not even close in comparing Wainwright to Z, despite Z's comeback year. Wainwright gives the Cards a clear advantage.
Back of the Rotation - Lohse/Welleymeyer/Thompson/Boggs v. Lilly/Dempster/Marshall/Gorzelanny is just as clear an advantage for the Cubs, but the back of the rotation isn't as important should both teams make the playoffs healthy. On the other hand, it becomes much more important should the Cards suffer any pitching injuries.
Bullpen - Ryan Franklin's having a great year, and Trever Miller's doing well in his specialized role. Beyond that, the StL 'pen doesn't impress me that much. St. Louis relievers have a 4.08 ERA overall with batters hitting .243/.323/.389. Cubs relievers have a 3.95 ERA overall with batters hitting .229/.343/.377. The Cubs strengthened their bullpen at the deadline, though, and I'm going to give the Cubs a very mild advantage here.
Depth - I don't know the Cardinals organization that well, so maybe I'm missing some things, but they strike me as thin, especially after their trades. The Cubs' depth has been tested all season long by injuries and has exceeded expectations. I'll give the Cubs the advantage here.
Overall Lineup - In terms of how they do v. LHP and RHP, the Cubs' lineup is fairly balanced, while the Cardinals have struggled v. LHP, giving up .100 OPS pts. That should be helped by the additions of Matt Holliday and Mark DeRosa, but is worth keeping an eye on. It's only been 17 games, but the Cubs' offense has come alive in the second half, hitting .278/.357/.485 while outscoring the Cardinals by 34 runs. For me, this is the big question.
Defense - It looks like the Cubs have had an advantage in fielding sizable enough that the Cards' acquisitions shouldn't make up the difference. Advantage Cubs.
So, Overall - that's the big question, right?
Overall, the Cardinals have been a slightly better team. The Cubs' offense had been underperforming woefully, but with the return of Aramis Ramirez, that has changed. On the other hand, the Cardinals upgraded their biggest offensive holes with Matt Holliday, Mark DeRosa, and potentially Julio Lugo. To match that, the underperforming Cubs' hitters have to continue stepping up. They have the ability to do so.
In the end, I think these teams are fairly evenly matched and fans of both should be hoping our teams push each other to overtake the Wild Card teams and both make the playoffs.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
147 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great analysis here as always
As it has been the entire season and will remain no matter what trades STL made, the Cubs are the better team when healthy and those players performing at their career averages.
Also the health of Chris Carpenter will be an interesting follow. Remember last season Ben Sheets had a very similar season to this and at the end of September his elbow was all torn up.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
I think you overlooked an advantage to the Cards
Managing.
LaRussa is better, but moreover, the Cardinals never seem to make the stupid mistakes that the Cubs make.
There is no such thing as an ugly female breast
Like a player not touching first base going for a double in extra innings?
Stupid mistakes like that?
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
I was just giving him a hard time
Clearly the cubs are the more mental-error prone team. Products of our farm system have no fundamentals in their background, and the guys we’ve signed in free agency (Fukudome being the exception) aren’t very good at the little things either.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
What? "execution" rather than mental?
Hmmm since to miss a bag you would hope you’re thinking about something else…getting an advantage running quickly, whether to stop at second rather than third, etc…isn’t that a mental error? Seems to me it’s much the same as watching a runner, dropping the ball anticipating the throw….besides no matter what you call it, it’s still an error and a big one. All that said…I think ,without backing it up with facts, that Tony’s teams usually do a better job of bunting, suicide squeezes, etc…execution indeed as you say.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 6:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Very interesting analysis.
This type of post is the whole point of fan posts. They are meant to be a discussion and not an emotional outlet for each person that chooses to vent.
If you wish to vent, just make a comment in an existing thread, please don’t make a new fan post to express your frustration.
That’s my $0.02.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Aug 3, 2009 9:52 AM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Rec'd.
This is a good example of someone sharing original content that’s backed up with some thought and research – which I believe is primarily what Fanposts are for.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Great points about the Cubs depth being a factor
after being forced to use all these guys because of injuries. I also like the DLee is in “incline” but I wouldn’t give the Cubs’ bullpen an advantage. Franklin has been ridiculous and Gregg’s ERA is now well over 4. Plus, Matt Holliday is a great pick-up.
Now, if we can just get the whole damn team on the field for an extended period of time. I mean, if someone said before the season we’d be missing so many players and still be in it, I wouldn’t have believed them.
One other thing...
Is who really has the “Home Field” advantage… Busch vs. Wrigley. Remember, each team plays 81 games there, and that’s a big deal. In my opinion, I think the Cardinals have the advantage in fielding, as Busch is pretty damn spacious and pretty even to all points, however Wrigley has much better fans that are into every pitch and on their feet in the first few innings on a 3-2 count with 2 outs, whereas down in STL they’re busy trying to see who’s leading the NASCAR race and don’t really get into it until the 5th or 6th. Pretty much a split advantage here, but I think the quality of the crowds at Wrigley greatly outweigh those at Busch, so advantage Cubs.
by lswaidz on Aug 3, 2009 10:11 AM CDT reply actions 7 recs
Rec this bad boy so the green shines all the way down to St. Louis
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Thanks...
Don’t get me wrong though, I’m not trying to insult STL fans, they’re smart fans… just don’t seem to care sometimes. I think the Cubs really have a better, smarted 26th man than they get down in STL… I’m sure if you asked Mark DeRosa or Jim Edmunds (and they responded honestly) they’d say they would rather play in front of a Wrigley crowd than a Busch crowd… even in a Cardinals uniform, obviously :-)
I don't know.
In the post-season last year, it almost seemed that Wrigley was making things worse for us. The crowd wasn’t so much supportive as…anxious. Everyone was on pins and needles and I think that energy didn’t help a team that was already inclined to press.
I think as a player I’d rather hear the opponents’ fans booing you rather than the oppressive silence of a crowd of your own people too afraid to get their hopes up.
What was there to support last year?
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I respectfully disagree with that.
Cardinals fans are definitely into their team for the entire game. I think the NASCAR thing is not what you think it is here. It may be popular but the fans at the ballpark, for the most part, know exactly what’s going on from first pitch to last. They come early and stay late and sell out pretty often.
As far as which team get an advantage from their fans, I’d say it’s a draw.
As far as which team get an advantage from their field….whoa….that’s a tough one for me. just don’t see a clear advantage. The wind at Wrigley can help anybody if it’s blowing out but the big hitters don’t care.
It’s not as big a factor in St Louis but you don’t get as many long balls from the minor hitters.
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx
by Dave Pendleton on Aug 5, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Two things that are understimated
A. LaRussa and Duncan
B. Cardinal defense
With Khalil Greene back the Cardinals flash an awful lot of leather. Molina is outstanding, Pujols very good, DeRosa okay, Greene excellent, Holliday good, Rasmus very good.
"Cubs will win 79 to 83 games." BLou (7/21/09)
Where is Greene playing?
Lugo will split time at second and short with Ryan and Schumaker. DeRosa is going to get all most all of the playing time at third since Holiday is now in left field everyday.
If your point is that he’s a good defensive guy for late inning replacement, I guess I agree, but with the talent that’s there (especially Ryan, who’s getting so good at short it makes me sick) I don’t see him getting subbed in very often.
"Whoever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" - Frank Chance
Brendan Ryan
Has been hurt and I really don’t expect Greene to turn things around. It’s all on Lugo.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
What about the black hole at second named Schumaker?
and Greene isn’t really good anymore at defense, plus he can’t hit at all so he probably won’t play much anyway.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Looking at overall team UZR
neither the Cubs or Cardinals are very good. The Cubs have a slight edge at -2.3 vs -5.3 for STL. Both are middle of the pack overall.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Greene
has been downright terrible in the field this year and I suspect he will see little to no playing time with the cardinals down the stretch. I would not be surprised if they tride to pass him through waivers and trade him for bullpen help…that is of course assuming someone wants a headcased middle infielder who will be a free agent next year.
"When two Whales Fight, many Shrimp Die" - Korean Proverb
by TheRiot Police on Aug 3, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I doubt a single team in baseball wants Greene
Can’t hit, can’t field, and is a mental case. No thank you
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
throw in the schedule
we have 5 games at hand
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
There are a lot of individual Cardinals who I think have excellent defense.
But as a team they have not been as good as the Cubs according to defensive stats. I’m also not sure how much playing time Greene will get. Lugo has been poor at SS this year and a middle-infield defense of Lugo-Schumaker can drag down a team.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
Greene is actually terrible on defense
And he won’t be getting any playing time anyways. Rasmus, Ludwick and Holliday are all +5 to +10 defenders at their position; ditto with Brendan Ryan, Pujols and Molina. Schumaker and Derosa are the only below average defenders.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Greene?
You had me until you included him there. His defense may be good, but his offense is horrible and won’t be playing this year…unless they bring him in as a PH. I don’t know whether that “anxiety disorder” is real anymore than Miles being injured, but either way the Cards don’t want to depend on him with DeRo around. If Greene actually does play this year it won’t be starting again and I doubt he will make the playoff roster.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 6:43 AM CDT up reply actions
5
that number is a huge advantage for us. We have 5 games at hand over the Cards, so we truly control our own future.
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
That also means the Cards have 5 more off days in the remaining two months of the season
That extra rest could help them quite a bit
"There are no curses here...Games are won and lost on the baseball field" - Lou Piniella
+1
You could see this week how hard it was resting players with the off day on thursday. With only one more off day the rest of the month, it’s gonna be a real grind and you may see more of a game being blown on offense or defense simply because they are tired and having to sub or play someone overworked. I’d say it gives us only a slight edge trying to pull away.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 6:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Great analysis, DGU
At face value, I would’ve given the advantage to the Cardinals in a few of these categories. But your analysis was in depth and spot on, and has made me realize that I was looking at things from a skewed point of view. Holliday still scares me in that lineup, but I think we can win this division. The antithesis to a BLOU post, you backed up your position with stats and facts. Well done, sir…and rec’d.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
Nicely done, as always DGU
But what I would have to say is that the Cubs definitely have WAy more talent than this Cards team. Yyou consider everything that’s gone wrong with the Cubs and to see that they’re only a half game out, tells you that they’re definitely a better team. The Cardinals are a lot more consistent, however. I think if the Cubs play the way they have been playing this second half for the rest of the season, they can easily win this division. If they play like they did the first half, it’s gonna be close.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 10:56 AM CDT reply actions
The only point I have to make about that
is that the Cards should be better in the second half as well with the addition of Matt Holliday. He makes their whole lineup exponentially better, so we NEED to play better in the second half. But yes, this division is right there for us to win.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
by ambrosiadreams on Aug 3, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree with you here...on all your points
That said I think the Cubs may have an edge even with the front of the rotation…as long as they are healthy which is always a big if on either team. What isn’t mentioned a lot is besides the addition of Holliday and DeRo, Carp and Waino…even Piniero have been pitching out of their minds, and deep into the game besides. It’s a lot to expect that continues the same…not saying they will become mediocre (with Piniero id say likely other than he’s in a contract year), but sure could happen they drop off a little. They are going to get tired by the end of the year, so seems to me it depends on which starters change more.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 6:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Cards pitching
The front of the StL rotation is much more solid than the Cubs right now. Lilly is out, Dempster is coming off an injury, Zambrano had back pains, the Cubs rotation is Wells and and whole bunch of question marks, while the Cards get to run Carpenter, Wainwright and Pineiro out there.
Also, the Cards have stability in the closer’s spot, something the Cubs lack.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions
The Cardinals have had their fare share of injuries too.
besides not having Carpenter from the beginning….
Loche, Ludwick, Green, Ryan, Green, Wainwright are just a few that have been in and out and on and off the Dl.
I never was much of a TLR fan but i have to say he can do a pretty good juggling act.
The Cardinals haven’t been totally healthy for most of the season but have been doing pretty well with glue and paperclips.
The one guy that seems to me is a negative factor is Wellemeyer. I think he’s as big a mental case as Green. Physically he seems to be ok but even Duncan can’t seem to get him on track. I cringe when he takes the mound nowdays.
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx
by Dave Pendleton on Aug 5, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice post. My only quibble is on
Albert as the best player. Up until this last week, he has been without peer as the absolute best hitter in baseball.
I always have difficulty comparing a first baseman to a quality centerfielder with some power to a #1 starting pitcher. That said, every manager would want AP with a bat in his hand with the game on the line.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
Well, Hanley Ramirez has become an above-average SS this year,
so maybe he is getting to the point where the case should be made that he’s superior to Albert.
But then I remember that Ryan Theriot should be the All-Star NL SS, which means that Hanley couldn’t be better than The Riot, so it’s back to Pujols v. Theriot again.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
Joe Mauer should also get some votes for this.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Absolutely.
Is AP the best 1B/DH and #1 on the list of batters any pitcher would prefer not to see? Yup.
However, another players plus defense at a tougher position, or a starting pitchers sub 3.0 ERA has to count for something in the best player discussion.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
If given the choice of Albert or Cy Young himself.....
I’d take Albert. Cy young would have won even more games if Albert was his 1st baseman.
So would most pitchers.
Dreysdale, Gibson, Spahn, Ryan and on and on. I’d trade any of them or Albert.
I think that’s why the decision was made to convert a premier, winning pitcher to an everyday player….Babe Ruth. The hitting everyday was a bigger advantage.
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx
by Dave Pendleton on Aug 5, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Good point Al.
I think the reason he doesn’t get as many, other than Albert’s star power and track record, is that he’s a catcher…and people expect that to wear him down eventually. Which I think will happen. He’ll still hit well…but we’re talking about the best hitter in baseball here.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 6:57 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd say both teams are about equal
The records speak to that. In the end, I think the Cubs are going to get healthy and win the division. Hill has been good for the Cubs, but imagine if Soto was in the lineup and not on the dl. The Cubs just had trouble staying healthy this year, once they do get healthy, they’ll make a good run to October.
A few things
Like several other people, I appreciate the in-depth analysis in this post.
That said, although I think these “side-by-side comparisons” are fun, I don’t really see their point. This is not high school tennis, where individual parts of each team compete and the winners earn points for their team.
In baseball, teams are just that: teams. Any side-by-side analysis ignores team chemistry and communication. In this case (trying to see which team has the edge in the final two months, which is what you’re really trying to do), the analysis also ignores four other incredibly important factors:
1. Schedule. Not just the teams they face and how many games are at home, but also the off-day schedule. For example, you noted the Cards have one of the best front-end rotations in the NL. Well, they also have many off-days down the stretch, allowing them to maximize the use of those starters.
2. Injuries. Enough said.
3. Momentum. An overpowering factor as the season winds to a close.
4. Luck.
Your analysis tells us one thing thing – these teams are pretty damn evenly matched (although we could have gotten that from their records, Pythagorean Records, run differentials, ERA’s and BA’s). It’s going to be a fun two months.
exactly
the cardinals will be getting a lot of starts out of their top two – who happen to be two of the best starting pitchers in baseball right now. and did the original poster suggest that rich harden could be as good as chris carpenter? what? carpenter’s got four good pitches, great control, and goes consistently deep into games. how in the hell could rich harden ever do that?
by John T. Unger on Aug 3, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe you've never seen Rich Harden pitch.
He had a 2.00 ERA last year. He’s a different kind of pitcher than Carpenter, but he can be as good as Carpenter.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
I agree with you
On this.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
They do have a great top 2
But Carpenter is very injury prone, and TLR hasn’t exactly been careful with him.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
I was trying to compare the teams.
It’s precisely because I can’t predict injuries and luck that I wasn’t making a case for who was going to win. Indeed, these “strength of schedule” arguments aren’t of much use to me because teams can become dramatically different through their own injuries, Sept. callups, where you catch them in their rotation, etc. Everybody keeps talking confidently about the “AAA Pirates” we’ll be facing, but sometimes you bring up those AAA players who have talent but don’t have detailed scouting reports against them and they play very well for the final 6-8 weeks of a season.
I remember being out in Baltimore in 2003, watching the Orioles, and these two young kids Luis Matos and Larry Bigbie looked pretty good down the stretch. Bigbie looked like an up-coming star. There was this other guy, who played 2B, who was just miserable down the stretch – forget his name, some switch-hitter.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
I'll bet we've tried to trade for that switch hitter
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Now that was funny!
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx
by Dave Pendleton on Aug 5, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions
we win it all
since Blou will be there with his BCB Shirt, rallying the troops with his confidence and inspirational speech
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out
Nice job overall but...
Why is Ted Lilly considered in the back end of the Cubs’ rotation? Seriously.
I thought it was mid-August
But he will make a rehab start, unlike Demp.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL - you totally misread his post. But good info.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Ohhhhh yes I did
Whatever, it’s kind of unfair that he’s considered back end because just about every pitcher in the cubs rotation would be front end on just about any other team.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 3, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions
That's a fair point.
I think the engima that is Rich Harden makes it hard to pinpoint whether Harden is, in fact, the Cubs’ No. 2 or No. 4. With Ted out injured and Rich making regular starts, I guess I’d say Z and Harden are the team’s top two starters right now. But it was certainly Z and Lilly for most of the first half or so of the season.
(Disclaimer: I’m basing this assessment more on feel than numbers.)
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I think it's hard to say who the Cubs' front 3 are.
In my view, Lilly and Demp aren’t front 3, however, until they prove they are pitching healthy again.
By the end of the season, the Cubs’ front three could easily be different, and clearly different, than the front three I mention here.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
by DGU on Aug 3, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Why don't you think Lilly is a front 3 starter this season?
His numbers certainly qualify, don’tcha think? Or don’tcha?
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
he certainly was but
there is no knowing what he will be like when he returns
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Harden is actually pretty consistent
xFIP’s over about 3.70 in each of the past 3 years. The only difference has been his HR/FB rate, which is pretty much just luck.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh
I meant to reply to you with the reply that ended up treed off daver’s post.
Anyway, the question in my mind for “front 3” was “Who would I start in a short series if that series was today?”
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
by DGU on Aug 3, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions
If the playoffs started tomorrow and Lilly was healthy enough to pitch..
I would go Lilly, Zambrano, Harden. I would have a hard time choosing between Dempster and Wells for game 4.
even though Zambrano and Harden have awful postseason numbers?
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 5, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions
You would pick Dempster over Zambrano or Harden? Dempster was bad last year
Zambrano has pitched faily well the last two postseasons but has gotten no run support. I would tend to go with experience over Wells at this point.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Aug 5, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Wow.
I never thought we’d get to the point where other folks would admit the Cardinals aren’t an early season fluke, and aren’t going away!
This is going to be a tough stretch for us – especially the next couple of weeks.
Here’s hoping the Cubs hang in there, and maybe Hendry has a trick up his sleeve somewhere we don’t know about yet via waiver trades…….
"Bite my shiny metal ass!" -- Bender Bending Rodriguez
"Life is just one crushing defeat after another until you just wish Flanders was dead."
by The Jade Scorpion on Aug 3, 2009 3:27 PM CDT reply actions
Hey, Lou, watch me pull a short second baseman out of my hat!
Again?!?

I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 3, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Now here's something we hope you'll really like!
prepare the special flags, as I’m hoping the beat Dusty train rides tonight.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
Ace
Who would be considered our two top guys? RIght now, I’d think Wells has to be in the mix simply on consistency.
"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields
Wells/Lilly
Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.
by drewishdrewid on Aug 3, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions
You would throw Randy Wells in game 1 of a playoff series?
Or thats just who you think are the best right now?
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Based simply on performance this season
Wells is their best starting pitcher and should start game #1
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Considering how that worked out last season
I’m hoping Lou uses his brain and sends Z out for game 1.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
How has Zambrano pitched in playoff situations?
Have you checked his stats? I am guessing you haven’t.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
In 07, he was great
And last year everybody on the team was kicking the ball around, and it wasn’t exactly his fault. In 03, though, he wasn’t very good, but he was also a lot younger. He’s been decent in the postseason.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
He was brilliant in 2007
He was going to be brilliant last year before the ship sunk around him. Z understands that moment and he presents the best option on the roser for winning any big game.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
One year out of three
1 for 3 is a good batting average, but I would think you would want your ace to be good more often than that.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 5, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions
The alternatives to Z starting
A playoff bedwetter-Ryan Dempster
A rookie who will have a career high IP- Randy Wells
The guy who bombed game 3 last year and can only go 5 innings- Rich Harden
Superman himself- Ted Lilly
Argue Lilly if you want, but Z is the man on this team like it or not.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Wells vs Zambrano
A rookie Wells who may be physically at the end of his tether or Zambrano, a guy who has not pitched well in most of his post season appearances? There is an old expression, doing the same thing over and over (Zambrano pitching in the playoffs) expecting a different result (that he will pitch well this time) is insane.
The decision is not so cut and dried as you would have us believe. While I believe that Zambrano will start either game 1 or 2 because he is the “ace” of the staff (even though he does not act or pitch like an ace), if Wells keeps going like he has been going, he deserves to start before Zambrano.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 5, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
You realize the very thing you are holding against Z
bad playoff starts as a young pitcher, is exactly what will happen with Wells.
Z was awesome in the regular season 2003, but wasn’t ready to pitch in the playoffs.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Assumes facts not in eveidence.
Just beacuse it happened to Zambrano you assume it will happen to Wells? Two very different pitchers and two very different people.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 6, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions
I love what Randy Wells has done this season...
…but I just wouldn’t take that chance with a rookie. I’d go Z, Harden, Lilly.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Yes, while Wells is untested in the playoffs,
in the postseason Zambrano has struggled in the postseason, Harden has been awful, and Lilly is hurt and it is uncertain what kind of shape he will be in. Wells starting game #1 is not such a crazy idea after all.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 4, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Big Z's mediocre postseason numbers...
…seem to be based largely on 2003. He’s pitched relatively well in the last two postseasons. Harden’s postseason numbers do look awful but, again, he really didn’t pitch badly last year.
And, in both cases, we’re looking at a pretty small sample size of IP. I would heed the Lesson of Ryan Dempster and not just start the guy who pitched the best during the regular season. But maybe I’m just overly conservative that way.
And, yeah, I suppose we will have to see how Lilly does when he comes back. He’s gone through a similiar injury before, though, and was able to recover.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
If Ted comes back and looks the same and Wells continues.
Today I’d Ted, Z, Wells. Have Harden as the 4th and move Demp to closer/reserve starter for the playoffs.
That said, there’s 59 games left, all have to be healthy and contributing, and the Cubs have to make October.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
I dunno...Harden's too good a pitcher to leave off a postseason rotation.
If Wells stays as consistently fantastic as he’s been, maybe you slot him in but it’ll probably be at Ted’s expense, which is kinda uncool (unless Ted’s effectiveness drops after the DL stint, of couse). That’s an interesting idea about making Demp the closer, though.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Dempster as closer?
If Gregg loses it and Marmol shows no sign of ever getting straightened out, maybe they have to consider moving Dempster back to closer when Lilly returns. Dempster was a solid closer, much like Gregg has been most of the season, so if Lilly comes back strong and Wells keeps pitching the way he has been pitching, they would have the luxury of moving Dempster to the pen.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 5, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Zambrano should be the easy choice to start game 1
he sould be the team’s unquestioned ace, but he is not an ace. Also, he has, unfortunately, not responded well to playoff pressure, so do you assume he will this time? Prior to his injury, Lilly earned the right to start game 1. With his status uncertain now, who starts game 1 is wide open. Wells has the best numbers, but I agree, starting a rookie in game 1, likely on the road, may be asking too much of the kid. So you are forced to go with veterans who unfortunately have not exactly shined under the postseason lights: Zambrano, Dempster and Harden.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
--Winston Churchill
by lookingdeadred on Aug 5, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
The thing about Wells, thankfully,
is that we’ve got another two months to see how he fares before a decision like that has to be made. But if he can extend the same performance he’s given so far through the next two months, well, then you have to keep using him in the playoffs, although, probably it would be best for him to pitch the second game where there’s less pressure.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
I just see it being Demp '08 all over again.
But I guess pitching him in game two might negate that.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
You gotta get Wells in here somewhere
As mentioned, he’s been the Cubs best and most consistent starter.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
So was Ryan Dempster last season.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
I'm not saying Wells shouls be number 1
Z should, just because he’s Z, and he’ll be mad if he isn’t and he has the most experience. You’re telling me you don’t think the Cubs should have even started Ryan Dempster in the playoffs last year?
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
No, but he shouldn't have gone game one.
I would’ve gone Z, Harden, Demp last year – and, yeah, that’s obviously with the benefit of hindsight. I just don’t want to see the Cubs make the same mistake, or one like it, again. I’d still lean on the veterans in the postseason.
Of course, this is all assuming the team gets there. Come to think of it – we probably shouldn’t even be talking about this.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Brian 17
mentioned something integral to this discussion. While it’s interesting to compare the personnel, if the point is to see which team is more suited or likely to play in October, then the rest of August bodes well for the Birds.
This month the Cubs face 3 formidable teams: at the Rox for 4, vs. the Phils for 3, and at the Dodgers for 4. The Cards, on the other hand, will meet only the Dodgers in LA for 3, and (if you still consider them a threat) Houston in STL. They play 7 games against SD, 3 against Pit, 3 against Cincy, and 3 against Washington.
Both teams have comparably tough(er) schedules in September. But to keep it close, the Cubs will have to play very well against a decent batch of teams. This, in short, is a very important month for the Cubs.
"Writing is exciting and baseball is like writing. You can never tell with either how it will go or what you will do." -- Marianne Moore
and I just
read the most recent recommended fanpost and I see this is discussed in a bit more depth. All these wasted key strokes…
"Writing is exciting and baseball is like writing. You can never tell with either how it will go or what you will do." -- Marianne Moore
Wow, what a great fanpost
Excellent job of analysis, DGU.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Aug 3, 2009 10:16 PM CDT reply actions
"Corner infield, advantage Cubs"...
I’m sorry, but are you high?
ZIPS RoS projection, CHONE defensive projection
Pujols: .447 wOBA, +10
DeRosa: .346 wOBA, +2
Ramirez: .390 wOBA, -3
Lee: .371 wOBA, 0
Assuming playing time is equal, that’s a .397 wOBA for the Cardinals and a .380 wOBA for the Cubs. Over the 500 or so plate appearances that those players will receive the rest of the season, that equates to about a 7 run difference with the bat. Fielding wise, the Cards are about 15 runs better per 600 plate appearances; adjusting that to 500 yields about a 13 run difference.
So the Cardinals are projected to about about 20 runs, or 2 wins, better than the Cubs going forward. How exactly does that make you think “advantage Cubs”?
Also, I love that on “defense” you quote the THT stat, while UZR, which most people say is the best one, has the Cubs and Cardinals nearly identical on defense.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
That might have come off as a little dickish
You are definitely a very smart poster, and this is a good post overall. However, you kinda dropped the ball on those two issues.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions
That's a nicely worded backhanded apology..
I’m sorry for what i said. Oh by the way once again I’ll say you were wrong though. You think everyone has to agree with your analysis you make using stats you choose ,because it was you who said it?
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions
He actually makes a strong point.
I hope you’re not going off on him just because he’s a Cards fan.
I've committed to tweeting about the Cubs for the rest of the season. (Does that sound as ridiculous as I think it does?) Anyway, if you're on Twitter, you can follow me here.
Exactly; the apology was for the tone
There’s no rule that says people can’t disagree on content.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions
I haven't had a problem with "content" here before.
What I said was it was a backhanded apology which it was. Instead of apologizing he has to mix in a dig that he was right at the same time…I don’t have a problem at all arguing topics with any fan of any team, I said it made it a backhanded apology and I’ll stand by that.
by Sandberg's evil twin on Aug 4, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok, no problem. I don't have a stake in this, anyway.
But FWIW, DGU seemed ok with it.
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Aug 4, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
He does
But as I showed below, considering the Cubs’ corner infield better than the Cards isn’t as crazy as vivaelpujols makes it seem.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
"showed"
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't worry about it - we're here to discuss and debate. But thanks all the same.
So, as to the two issues, first defense – I see that UZR/150 has them closer than UZR itself. I didn’t factor in the difference in games played. So, ok, we can call defense a push, although Julio Lugo’s playing time at SS is worth keeping an eye on.
Mark DeRosa is hitting .208/.266/.514 so far with the Cards and given his injury, I am suspicious of both his offensive and defensive projections. I also think that the Cubs under Piniella have been de-Dustifying Aramis Ramirez’ approach at the plate; perhaps there is too much Cub-fan in this and not enough reason, but I am hopeful he can continue to beat his projections (although that AVG will come down, and with it, the OBP and SLG, too, I expect.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
by DGU on Aug 4, 2009 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions
DeRosa's numbers with the Cardinals come with a .182 BABIP
I think you know which direction that’s heading in. Also the fact he’s hit like 7 homers since his return pretty much shows that his wrist is feeling fine.
As for Ramirez beating his projection, that’s pretty unlikely even if he wasn’t just coming off of injury. His projection already calls for a .391 wOBA, which is better than he has done in any full season since 2004.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Rammy>DeRo offensivly and defensivly
And if you take out DLees April numbers, he’s very similar to Pujols.
Pujols: 308 avg 26 HR 64 RBI
Lee: 320 AVG 20 HR 61 RBI’s
So, it’s definitely a close race for the corner infield.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions
wow
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Care to elaborate on that?
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Your point about Lee post April is interesting, but it assumes
Lee won’t slump and will stay on a tear. Pujols has been slumping to bring his average down to mortal levels. If you take out Albert’s slump, his average is much higher.
Your selectively taking away one guys slump and leaving the other.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
I understand that
But take out Pujols’ slump, and that raises his average to where DLee’s is, so the only difference is homeruns.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
"if you take out D-Lee's April numbers"
The problem is you can’t do that. You can’t just highlight a players best two months, while ignoring his worst ones. You also can’t ignore that past couple of years when deciding which player is better. It’s clear that Pujols is a far better hitter than Lee going forward.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed - The difference between Ramirez and DeRosa offsets some of the
spread between Lee and Pujols to make the combinations closer to equal. Easier just to give the edge at first to the Cards and at third to the Cubs and be done with it.
if this was still new to me, i wouldn't understand
But it isn't
Because the edge at first for the Cardinals is much greater than the edge at third for the Cubs; as I showed in my initial post.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Also
CHONE defensive projections, which give weight to The Fans Scouting Report, say that DeRosa > Ramirez defensively.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 4, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
You could argue that
DeRo has some stats that are greater than Ramirez, and vice-versa.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Sure
Overally Ramirez >> DeRosa offensively. DeRosa > Ramirez defensively. Ramirez > DeRosa overall.
Pujols >>>Lee offensively. Pujols > Lee defensively. Pujols >>>> Lee overall.
>>>> is better than >
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
I, for the most part agree
But you made it seem like it was absolutely ridiculous to put the Cubs ahead of the Cards at the corner infield positions. All in all, yes, the Cards do have a better corner infield, but is someone high if they suggest that the Cubs might be better? No.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 4, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you overrate Pujols Defense
or underrate Lee’s. His defense isn’t really in decline, which is obvious on virtually every groundball hit to the left side of the cubs infield.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
I am just going by the stats
Which say that Pujols is a +10 defender and Lee is average.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
I think is where stats still don't show the complete picture
Pujols seems to have a more range to the second base side, so much so that he occasionally seems to be the second baseman, while Lee excels at playing balls down the line.
Also I would be surprised if the metrics were able to account for Ryan Theriot and Aramis Ramirez throws, some of which would probably give Pujols fits.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
This may be one instance where it is better to believe your eyes. I
have seen both Lee and Pujols many games and I find it hard to believe that anyone would feel that Pujols is a much better fielder than Lee. There may be different aspects of playing the position where one player is sligtly better than the other, but I certainly have seen no great difference. Lee excels at scooping balls and moving to his glove side. Pujols probably has more range to his right. Pujols has not had a good year defensively. He has allowed balls to go through his legs at key moments and his throwing has not been better. I would rate them as equals defensively. If pushed, I would give a slight edge to Lee.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Aug 5, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree 100% with what you said here
Defensive metrics are good, but I think they fall behind for first basemen. Too many of those little things going on to put a concrete stat on it.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
Yes, but they even out over the 3-4 year period we are talking about
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
not if one player is better than the other at the little things
Lee and Pujols could play first for 100 years and Lee will never be better at moving to his right than Pujols, and Pujols will never be better going left than Derrek.
Its essentially pointless at this point anyway because we are talking about 2 of the 3 best defensive first basemen in the game. Lee, Pujols, and Texiera are all awesome there and all add more value with their defense than metrics can measure.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
i'm digesting this....
(i don’t know how to highlight part of a post like you guys do.)
Ryan Theriot and Aramis Ramirez throws, some of which would probably give Pujols fits.
__________________________________________________
Albert hasn’t been getting that many throws that give him fits, so is that a factor as well when considering the defense of Ryan Theriot and Aramis Ramirez?
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx
by Dave Pendleton on Aug 5, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Also
Lee has never played a like a good defender. He may very well have some hidden talents that fool defensive metrics, but there is no evidence that he is actually a good defender.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
I'm certainly no expert on defensive metrics
but my understanding is that UZR doesn’t take into account the 1B’s receiving skills, and because Errors are such an erratic stat, they don’t help much in that either. In watching DLee, my sense is that his defensive reputation comes from how well he receives at 1B and that his range is indeed average. Ramirez and Theriot both fling a lot of bad throws across the diamond, which Lee saves regularly.
Of course, we know that Theriot throws poorly on purpose to make DLee look so good. Theriot never throws one or even two hoppers for any other reason than because he knows Lee can catch them and wants to make his teammates shine. That’s one of his intangibles, which Pujols only wishes he could emulate.
Randy Wells - You continue to astound me.
by DGU on Aug 4, 2009 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions
We've already discussed this, I believe
And based off at least one attempt to quantify digging balls out of the dirt, Lee, or anyone for that matter, derives much value from that ability.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/first-basemen-scoops/
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
Except for those three...
pesky gold gloves. While there have been more than a few questionable gold gloves given out, they are awarded by people that watch the game and see the throws he has to deal with.
I’d say at the least, that’s evidence he’s at least “good” at playing first base.
"Whoever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" - Frank Chance
Fun Stuff!
Good post, DGU!!
"I wouldn't be a part of any club that would have me as a member" : Groucho Marx

by 























