Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Cubs Historic Photos: 20th In A Series

One player in this photo became famous, not long after it was taken, for something off the field. But exactly what is happening here is somewhat of a mystery. Follow me after the jump for the story.

All the way to the Supreme Court

Star-divide

The player I'm referring to, obviously, is the Cardinals' Curt Flood, who, after being traded to the Phillies after the 1969 season, filed suit against baseball, claiming he couldn't be treated as property and dealt against his wishes. The suit eventually reached the Supreme Court in 1972; you can read the entire Supreme Court opinion here. They upheld baseball's anti-trust exemption -- something Congress keeps saying they're going to get around to revoking, but they never do. Incidentally, that opinion is famous in judicial circles for another reason -- Justice Harry Blackmun, a huge baseball fan, was assigned to write the majority opinion and put over seventy names of baseball greats from the past into it.

Now, about the photo: your first clue is the right sleeve of Glenn Beckert. What's that patch? It's the Illinois Sesquicentennial patch, worn for the 150th anniversary of Illinois statehood in 1968 by Chicago sports teams. (I also especially like the umpire in this photo -- remember when they wore shirts and ties?)

So, now we know the photo was taken in 1968. The Cardinals played nine games at Wrigley in 1968 and Flood played in all of them. The short sleeves eliminate the two April games, and Flood didn't reach base in one of the four August games. In two of the other three August games, when Flood reached base once, he was stranded at first. In the other, he advanced on a wild pitch, unlikely to have resulted in a photo like that one.

We're left, then, with June 28, 29 and 30. On June 30, Flood reached base once on a single, but advanced to second on an error -- again, no photo like that could have resulted. On June 29, there's a possibility in the first inning, after a Flood single, he was erased on a double play, but that doesn't look like a DP pivot.

That makes this photo from June 28, 1968; Flood singled in the first inning and stole second. The Cubs lost the game 9-5; at the time, the loss made their record 31-41, ten games under .500. The 1968 Cubs are the only team in franchise history to come from ten games under .500 and finish with a winning record (84-78).

Remember, you can buy this photo and many other Cub and Chicago-related photos on eBay; search for items from seller "suntimesphotoarchive".

Comment 50 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Respectfully disagree

To me that looks exactly like a double-play turn by the SS coming across the bag, dragging his right toe across the back corner. The throw obviously would have come from the right side of the infield and it would seem that the placement of the umpire, looking from the RF side of second base towards the left side of the infield, would support that.

Given the relatively few spike marks in the infield dirt, I would guess this was the first inning DP from June 29.

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 8:46 AM CST reply actions  

Amend

…looking from the RF side of second base towards the right side of the infield…

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 8:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Does that look like Don Kessinger to you?

It didn’t to me, but you could be right.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jan 27, 2010 8:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually...

That kinda does look like Kessinger to me.

besides…that really seems like an odd position to be catching a throw from catcher as the picture appears to be shot from the first base side of the upper deck.

Now, maybe things have changed a bit in recent years, but normally an umpire wouldn’t be in that position during a stolen base attempt.

On more thing…from what I can tell, Beckert didn’t wear undershirts with sleeves like that, but Kessinger appears to have often worn undershirts of that sort.

by doc_blume on Jan 27, 2010 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Not the 29th

Per Retrosheet, Harry Wendelstadt was the umpire at second base that game. That picture is not Wendelstadt who was not thin as the umpire is in the picture.

by rlpete on Jan 27, 2010 8:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Not sure

Can’t really tell whether that is or isnt’ Kessenger. But the glove placement of the infielder also seems to support that he received a throw from the right side of the infield. Just another clue perhaps.

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 8:53 AM CST reply actions  

Shirt Sleeves

The umpire is wearing a jacket and flood has semi long sleeves. Seems like a mild April day could be possible.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Jan 27, 2010 9:23 AM CST reply actions  

If I remember

correctly, the umpires wore their jackets back then unless it got hot as Hades. Brickhouse used to use the umpires taking their jackets off as a true indicator, more than the thermometer, that it was blistering hot. But this could have been April if it was a nice day. Flood was forced at second in a 4-6-3 on April 13, 1968, fifth inning.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

A tough one ...

Doesn’t look like either Kessinger or Beckert to me, the way his face is contorted, but I seem to remember Kessinger wearing flip-down shades, which are visible in the shot. Did Beckert also? I don’t have as strong a memory of him wearing them, but maybe he did. There’s this photo of Kessinger, which was easy to find.

http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/don_kessinger_autograph.jpg

It hasn’t been too easy for me to find an action shot of Beckert.

It looks like the fielder has the ball well before Flood will reach the bag, which would suggest that he would have been out if stealing. And look at the ump’s right hand. Is he about to call Flood out? His left hand is open, but his right looks like it might be in the process of being made into a fist for making the out call, as he watches the infielder’s feet, which would suggest a force.

And the infielder’s hands — it looks to me like he’s about to take the ball out of his mitt for the relay throw.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:25 AM CST reply actions  

Looks like a cloudy day...

… so players probably wouldn’t have been wearing sunglasses.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jan 27, 2010 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

But looking under the bill of his

cap, it looks like there are sunglasses there, flipped up. I think they are contributing to the distorted look of his face. I think you can see the little lever that was used to flip the glasses up or down just under the front right corner of the bill. Maybe it was partly cloudy!

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Beckert

That’s Glen Beckert pivoting after a throw from Kessinger. The glove is pointed in the direction it is because he is pulling the ball out, about to throw to first. There is no way that is Kessinger. Look at the direction of the feet, there is no way Kessinger could have possibly ended up “backwards” prior to making a throw to first. Coming from the shortstop position, his feet would have been pointed toward first base or right field, at worst. It is Beckert.

by Galtwho on Jan 27, 2010 9:34 AM CST reply actions  

Don't the feet appear wrong for a pivot?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jan 27, 2010 9:37 AM CST up reply actions  

It looks like he's approaching from the RF side, but

look at the footprints. There are two dark marks in the dirt suggesting that his right foot arrived from the shortstop side of the bag. There are no close footprints from the 2nd base side.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

This is a good one

Perhaps the best of all of the “clue” photos so far. But I agree, there are no footprints coming from 2B which I think is pretty indicative that it’s the SS making the pivot. In addition to him dragging his right foot as SS’s do on the turn at 2B, most 2B receive the throw with their left-foot on the bag in order to use the bag as protection on the pivot.

If the 2B is backing up with his feet in that position, he’s not going to get a return throw off and is settling for a force. If that were the 2B taking the throw, he’d be shown with his right-foot either on the bag or just having come off of it returning the throw to first.

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Amend...again

…his left-foot either on the bag or just having come off of it returning the throw to first…

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't think it's a steal

He doesn’t appear to be going down for a tag, he looks like he’s about to throw.

by Arbusto on Jan 27, 2010 9:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it's a ball to end the inning, easier to throw to 2nd than to first maybe?

Or maybe the infield was playing back so Beckert had to come in to second instead of pivoting away from the infield

"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher

by Musicdude10 on Jan 27, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

When I first saw the pic I said it was Beckert immediately

The one thing that is strange is where the ump is. I know in this era, the 2nd base ump stations himself on the infield grass if there is a runner at first so he gets a good view of any steal or force play at second. I can’t figure out why he is behind 2nd if Flood was on first. Maybe this is a situation where Flood is trying for a double and Becks is fielding a throw that was off the mark, which may make him look out of position.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Jan 27, 2010 10:18 AM CST reply actions  

Same here

It totally looks like Beckert, not Kessinger.

"Who's Bob Brenly? The guy that used to be the manager for Arizona?" ~ Alfonso Guilleard Soriano

by JohnM on Jan 27, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Jose Arcia?

See below

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Jan 27, 2010 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Ole Beckert had some popeye sized forearms...

didn’t he? I agree with Al—the only way that’s a DP pivot is if it’s a 3-6-3 or 3-4-3…looks like Hundley may have short hopped him on the throw down and Beck was fighting the ball a little—or he was having a bit of a problem getting a handle on the ball and was turning to see where Flood was at the same time.

I remember a pretty well known SI cover from this same era with Flood making a catch in CF at Wrigley—but he appears to be trapping the ball against the wall right at the 400 Ft sign

"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like to him."
Solomon

by cubfever7 on Jan 27, 2010 10:56 AM CST reply actions  

Umpires look better now.

That suit makes him look like an undertaker.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jan 27, 2010 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

I got

The Capt Morgan reference. Funny.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Jan 27, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Perhaps....

….it is indeed from the June 28, 1968 game but from the fifth inning when Flood doubled to left. Beckert would have been covering 2B and perhaps the throw got away from him which is why he’s looking towards the right-side of the infield. Perhaps the grounds crew had recently dragged the infield which explains the few spike marks other than around the bag. It also would explain why the 2B umpire would be behind the play. If there is a runner on first, the 2B umpire is usually towards the middle fo the diamond.

Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?

by krummy12 on Jan 27, 2010 11:11 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe, but

it looks to me like the infielder is grabbing the ball from underneath the mitt. And speaking of mitts, compare to Kessinger’s mitt here

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions  

The mitt in the historic photo looks

more like Kessinger’s mitt — kind of beat up and flat, rather than Beckert’s more substantial Wilson (I think). Also, I may be crazy but the infielder’s mitt looks like it only had a thumb and 3 fingers. Maybe the fourth finger is hidden. But then Kessinger’s mitt above also looks like a three-finger model. It must be the angle. I didn’t think they still made them in the late 1960’s.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Another possibility

Al – take another look at the June 30 game. Could the player in the picture be neither Kessinger or Beckert, but rather Jose Arcia, who came into the game at ss in the 2nd after Kessinger was hit by a pitch? This play might be from the top of the third inning of that game, where Flood reached 2nd on an error by the ss on a ball hit by Tim McCarver (who was no doubt talking all the way down to 1b).

Here’s Arcia’s photo from baseball cube.

The play just doesn’t look like a cover of a stolen base. The odd positioning of the fielder makes it appear as if something had gone screwy in the play. Since the PBP does not specify the error that occurred, I think this might be a photo of that play

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Jan 27, 2010 11:54 AM CST reply actions  

The fielder in the picture looks more like

Arcia than either Kessinger or Beckert, IMO. So it would have had to work something like this — maybe Flood was trying to steal, or it’s a hit-and-run. McCarver batted lefty so I think the normal man to cover 2nd with Flood breaking would have been the SS. McCarver smacks it up the middle, right where Arcia is running to cover the bag. Arcia is now thinking 6-3 double play, but he boots it for the E6 (Ground Ball) detailed in the PBP. Thus the grimace. Ball ends up in the outfield, but Flood is already on his backside and so can’t advance to 3rd. Plausible?

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

This sounds much more likely to me

This isn’t Kessinger. At first glance I didn’t think Beckert either. I have no idea what Arcia looked like as a Cub. However, this scenario seems much more likely. It was a ground ball to the right side (McCarver as mentioned was a lefty). The throw was made to Arcia covering at 2nd and he dropped the ball.

by rlpete on Jan 27, 2010 6:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it's Beckert.

Kessinger was a beanpole with pipe cleaner arms. Kessinger’s thighs weren’t as big as the fore arms on this guy. Not that he’s Mark McGwire but I mean Kess was skinny. I agree that something probably went wrong on the throw from home. Maybe the ball bounced in and is hidden by Beckert’s body, mitt or something.

by the nth on Jan 27, 2010 11:59 AM CST reply actions  

I'm currently listening to...

the audiobook version of As They See ‘Em (thanks for the rec Al, this is a good book) so my first inclination was to look at the ump’s position. Based upon what’s in the book, wouldn’t the better position for the ump to see the play be more toward RF so that he was (in effect) between Kessinger/Beckert and Flood? It seems to me that his view is obscured by the the infielder.

by madmf on Jan 27, 2010 12:03 PM CST reply actions  

A way to definitively solve the 6/28 or 6/30 question

Per Retrosheet -

6/28 – 2nd base umpire: Ken Burkhart
6/30 – 2nd base umpire: Bill Jacowski

Now just need to find pictures of one of these two. Harry Wendlestedt was also in this crew but unfortunately he wasn’t involved here as it would be easy to verify his picture.

by rlpete on Jan 27, 2010 6:42 PM CST reply actions  

Bill Jackowski

I think it is Jackowski

This is the only photo I could find of Burkhart… obviously several years earlier.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Jan 28, 2010 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Of course...

… now that I look at it again, I could be totally wrong.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Jan 28, 2010 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

actually..... it sort of looks photoshopped

baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it

by cooliogirl47 on Jan 27, 2010 7:16 PM CST reply actions  

Flood does sort of look like he was pasted on.

Maybe Al is just playing a joke on us and this photo is just made up.

"Fasten those seatbelts"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jan 28, 2010 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

It looks like they did a dodge and burn when printing the photo

Used when creating a print from a negative.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodging_and_burning

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Jan 28, 2010 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

It's from the Sun-Times photo archive.

I think they did a lot of that in those days — several other photos I have look similar.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jan 28, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Common photo technique when printing

No photoshop back in the day. Pictures came out that way. No doctoring involved

"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher

by Musicdude10 on Jan 29, 2010 9:32 AM CST up reply actions  

no wonder they're so hard!

baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it

by cooliogirl47 on Jan 30, 2010 5:57 PM CST up reply actions  

With the umpire

in the background that would indicate to me that it is a double. Most of the time if there is someone on first the ump is in the infield so he can see a steal from the front not behind.

Let go cubs

by cubsfaninkc on Jan 27, 2010 7:59 PM CST reply actions  

Those of us of a certain age

learned what “Sesquicentennial” meant in 1968. Hard to believe that just 8 years from now will be Illinois’ bicentennial – and I expect the Cubs and Sox will have patches for that as well.

Let’s hope the Cubs can put the Illinois Bicentennial patch on one sleeve and the “2017 World Champions” patch on the other.

by ChipSet on Jan 27, 2010 9:01 PM CST reply actions  

I'd like a "World Series Champions" patch before then, actually. :)

Who cares if he's a Cubs fan? This is a football forum! He is a PACKER fan as well. So, from now until March, I’m sure he’ll dedicate a lot of his time here. In late March, then we can be enemies during the baseball season. Besides, the Cubs have perhaps the most loyal baseball fanbase in the country. You have to respect that.

Go Pack!

by Jabooty on Jan 25, 2010 2:58 PM EST

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jan 27, 2010 11:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course I meant

“2010-2017 World Series Champions” :-)

by ChipSet on Jan 29, 2010 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Castro_small
Getting Excited For Baseball Season
Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

MLB 12 The Show Marlins Park Trailer, complete with the monstrosity and the fish. Here's the link...
Construction on the party patio and new LED board has begun. Taken from the Wrigley webcam, 11:35 am CT, 2/12/12
The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  384 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski