Cubs Historic Photos: 20th In A Series
One player in this photo became famous, not long after it was taken, for something off the field. But exactly what is happening here is somewhat of a mystery. Follow me after the jump for the story.
The player I'm referring to, obviously, is the Cardinals' Curt Flood, who, after being traded to the Phillies after the 1969 season, filed suit against baseball, claiming he couldn't be treated as property and dealt against his wishes. The suit eventually reached the Supreme Court in 1972; you can read the entire Supreme Court opinion here. They upheld baseball's anti-trust exemption -- something Congress keeps saying they're going to get around to revoking, but they never do. Incidentally, that opinion is famous in judicial circles for another reason -- Justice Harry Blackmun, a huge baseball fan, was assigned to write the majority opinion and put over seventy names of baseball greats from the past into it.
Now, about the photo: your first clue is the right sleeve of Glenn Beckert. What's that patch? It's the Illinois Sesquicentennial patch, worn for the 150th anniversary of Illinois statehood in 1968 by Chicago sports teams. (I also especially like the umpire in this photo -- remember when they wore shirts and ties?)
So, now we know the photo was taken in 1968. The Cardinals played nine games at Wrigley in 1968 and Flood played in all of them. The short sleeves eliminate the two April games, and Flood didn't reach base in one of the four August games. In two of the other three August games, when Flood reached base once, he was stranded at first. In the other, he advanced on a wild pitch, unlikely to have resulted in a photo like that one.
We're left, then, with June 28, 29 and 30. On June 30, Flood reached base once on a single, but advanced to second on an error -- again, no photo like that could have resulted. On June 29, there's a possibility in the first inning, after a Flood single, he was erased on a double play, but that doesn't look like a DP pivot.
That makes this photo from June 28, 1968; Flood singled in the first inning and stole second. The Cubs lost the game 9-5; at the time, the loss made their record 31-41, ten games under .500. The 1968 Cubs are the only team in franchise history to come from ten games under .500 and finish with a winning record (84-78).
Remember, you can buy this photo and many other Cub and Chicago-related photos on eBay; search for items from seller "suntimesphotoarchive".
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Respectfully disagree
To me that looks exactly like a double-play turn by the SS coming across the bag, dragging his right toe across the back corner. The throw obviously would have come from the right side of the infield and it would seem that the placement of the umpire, looking from the RF side of second base towards the left side of the infield, would support that.
Given the relatively few spike marks in the infield dirt, I would guess this was the first inning DP from June 29.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Amend
…looking from the RF side of second base towards the right side of the infield…
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Does that look like Don Kessinger to you?
It didn’t to me, but you could be right.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Actually...
That kinda does look like Kessinger to me.
besides…that really seems like an odd position to be catching a throw from catcher as the picture appears to be shot from the first base side of the upper deck.
Now, maybe things have changed a bit in recent years, but normally an umpire wouldn’t be in that position during a stolen base attempt.
On more thing…from what I can tell, Beckert didn’t wear undershirts with sleeves like that, but Kessinger appears to have often worn undershirts of that sort.
Not the 29th
Per Retrosheet, Harry Wendelstadt was the umpire at second base that game. That picture is not Wendelstadt who was not thin as the umpire is in the picture.
Not sure
Can’t really tell whether that is or isnt’ Kessenger. But the glove placement of the infielder also seems to support that he received a throw from the right side of the infield. Just another clue perhaps.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Shirt Sleeves
The umpire is wearing a jacket and flood has semi long sleeves. Seems like a mild April day could be possible.
Eamus Ursuli!
If I remember
correctly, the umpires wore their jackets back then unless it got hot as Hades. Brickhouse used to use the umpires taking their jackets off as a true indicator, more than the thermometer, that it was blistering hot. But this could have been April if it was a nice day. Flood was forced at second in a 4-6-3 on April 13, 1968, fifth inning.
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:28 AM CST up reply actions
A tough one ...
Doesn’t look like either Kessinger or Beckert to me, the way his face is contorted, but I seem to remember Kessinger wearing flip-down shades, which are visible in the shot. Did Beckert also? I don’t have as strong a memory of him wearing them, but maybe he did. There’s this photo of Kessinger, which was easy to find.
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/don_kessinger_autograph.jpg
It hasn’t been too easy for me to find an action shot of Beckert.
It looks like the fielder has the ball well before Flood will reach the bag, which would suggest that he would have been out if stealing. And look at the ump’s right hand. Is he about to call Flood out? His left hand is open, but his right looks like it might be in the process of being made into a fist for making the out call, as he watches the infielder’s feet, which would suggest a force.
And the infielder’s hands — it looks to me like he’s about to take the ball out of his mitt for the relay throw.
One of Lee Elia's 15%
Looks like a cloudy day...
… so players probably wouldn’t have been wearing sunglasses.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
But looking under the bill of his
cap, it looks like there are sunglasses there, flipped up. I think they are contributing to the distorted look of his face. I think you can see the little lever that was used to flip the glasses up or down just under the front right corner of the bill. Maybe it was partly cloudy!
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:36 AM CST up reply actions
Beckert
That’s Glen Beckert pivoting after a throw from Kessinger. The glove is pointed in the direction it is because he is pulling the ball out, about to throw to first. There is no way that is Kessinger. Look at the direction of the feet, there is no way Kessinger could have possibly ended up “backwards” prior to making a throw to first. Coming from the shortstop position, his feet would have been pointed toward first base or right field, at worst. It is Beckert.
It looks like he's approaching from the RF side, but
look at the footprints. There are two dark marks in the dirt suggesting that his right foot arrived from the shortstop side of the bag. There are no close footprints from the 2nd base side.
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
This is a good one
Perhaps the best of all of the “clue” photos so far. But I agree, there are no footprints coming from 2B which I think is pretty indicative that it’s the SS making the pivot. In addition to him dragging his right foot as SS’s do on the turn at 2B, most 2B receive the throw with their left-foot on the bag in order to use the bag as protection on the pivot.
If the 2B is backing up with his feet in that position, he’s not going to get a return throw off and is settling for a force. If that were the 2B taking the throw, he’d be shown with his right-foot either on the bag or just having come off of it returning the throw to first.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Amend...again
…his left-foot either on the bag or just having come off of it returning the throw to first…
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Don't think it's a steal
He doesn’t appear to be going down for a tag, he looks like he’s about to throw.
I think it's a ball to end the inning, easier to throw to 2nd than to first maybe?
Or maybe the infield was playing back so Beckert had to come in to second instead of pivoting away from the infield
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
by Musicdude10 on Jan 27, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions
When I first saw the pic I said it was Beckert immediately
The one thing that is strange is where the ump is. I know in this era, the 2nd base ump stations himself on the infield grass if there is a runner at first so he gets a good view of any steal or force play at second. I can’t figure out why he is behind 2nd if Flood was on first. Maybe this is a situation where Flood is trying for a double and Becks is fielding a throw that was off the mark, which may make him look out of position.
"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse
Same here
It totally looks like Beckert, not Kessinger.
"Who's Bob Brenly? The guy that used to be the manager for Arizona?" ~ Alfonso Guilleard Soriano
Jose Arcia?
See below
I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"
Ole Beckert had some popeye sized forearms...
didn’t he? I agree with Al—the only way that’s a DP pivot is if it’s a 3-6-3 or 3-4-3…looks like Hundley may have short hopped him on the throw down and Beck was fighting the ball a little—or he was having a bit of a problem getting a handle on the ball and was turning to see where Flood was at the same time.
I remember a pretty well known SI cover from this same era with Flood making a catch in CF at Wrigley—but he appears to be trapping the ball against the wall right at the 400 Ft sign
"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like to him."
Solomon
Umpires look better now.
That suit makes him look like an undertaker.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Perhaps....
….it is indeed from the June 28, 1968 game but from the fifth inning when Flood doubled to left. Beckert would have been covering 2B and perhaps the throw got away from him which is why he’s looking towards the right-side of the infield. Perhaps the grounds crew had recently dragged the infield which explains the few spike marks other than around the bag. It also would explain why the 2B umpire would be behind the play. If there is a runner on first, the 2B umpire is usually towards the middle fo the diamond.
Who needs a stinkin' tag line? What are they for anyway?
Maybe, but
it looks to me like the infielder is grabbing the ball from underneath the mitt. And speaking of mitts, compare to Kessinger’s mitt here
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
or Beckert's mitt here

One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
The mitt in the historic photo looks
more like Kessinger’s mitt — kind of beat up and flat, rather than Beckert’s more substantial Wilson (I think). Also, I may be crazy but the infielder’s mitt looks like it only had a thumb and 3 fingers. Maybe the fourth finger is hidden. But then Kessinger’s mitt above also looks like a three-finger model. It must be the angle. I didn’t think they still made them in the late 1960’s.
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 11:45 AM CST up reply actions
Another possibility
Al – take another look at the June 30 game. Could the player in the picture be neither Kessinger or Beckert, but rather Jose Arcia, who came into the game at ss in the 2nd after Kessinger was hit by a pitch? This play might be from the top of the third inning of that game, where Flood reached 2nd on an error by the ss on a ball hit by Tim McCarver (who was no doubt talking all the way down to 1b).
Here’s Arcia’s photo from baseball cube.
The play just doesn’t look like a cover of a stolen base. The odd positioning of the fielder makes it appear as if something had gone screwy in the play. Since the PBP does not specify the error that occurred, I think this might be a photo of that play
I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"
Here's Arcia as a Cub

One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
The fielder in the picture looks more like
Arcia than either Kessinger or Beckert, IMO. So it would have had to work something like this — maybe Flood was trying to steal, or it’s a hit-and-run. McCarver batted lefty so I think the normal man to cover 2nd with Flood breaking would have been the SS. McCarver smacks it up the middle, right where Arcia is running to cover the bag. Arcia is now thinking 6-3 double play, but he boots it for the E6 (Ground Ball) detailed in the PBP. Thus the grimace. Ball ends up in the outfield, but Flood is already on his backside and so can’t advance to 3rd. Plausible?
One of Lee Elia's 15%
by waiting4cubs on Jan 27, 2010 12:54 PM CST up reply actions
This sounds much more likely to me
This isn’t Kessinger. At first glance I didn’t think Beckert either. I have no idea what Arcia looked like as a Cub. However, this scenario seems much more likely. It was a ground ball to the right side (McCarver as mentioned was a lefty). The throw was made to Arcia covering at 2nd and he dropped the ball.
I think it's Beckert.
Kessinger was a beanpole with pipe cleaner arms. Kessinger’s thighs weren’t as big as the fore arms on this guy. Not that he’s Mark McGwire but I mean Kess was skinny. I agree that something probably went wrong on the throw from home. Maybe the ball bounced in and is hidden by Beckert’s body, mitt or something.
I'm currently listening to...
the audiobook version of As They See ‘Em (thanks for the rec Al, this is a good book) so my first inclination was to look at the ump’s position. Based upon what’s in the book, wouldn’t the better position for the ump to see the play be more toward RF so that he was (in effect) between Kessinger/Beckert and Flood? It seems to me that his view is obscured by the the infielder.
A way to definitively solve the 6/28 or 6/30 question
Per Retrosheet -
6/28 – 2nd base umpire: Ken Burkhart
6/30 – 2nd base umpire: Bill Jacowski
Now just need to find pictures of one of these two. Harry Wendlestedt was also in this crew but unfortunately he wasn’t involved here as it would be easy to verify his picture.
Interesting points on Burkhart
He was a formal major league pitcher. He also made the famous Bernie Carbo/Elrod Hendricks World Series call even though he couldn’t see the play. Here is a picture. You be the judge. I can’t tell……
Bill Jackowski
I think it is Jackowski

This is the only photo I could find of Burkhart… obviously several years earlier.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"
Of course...
… now that I look at it again, I could be totally wrong.
I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"
actually..... it sort of looks photoshopped
baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it
Flood does sort of look like he was pasted on.
Maybe Al is just playing a joke on us and this photo is just made up.
"Fasten those seatbelts"-Pat Hughes
It looks like they did a dodge and burn when printing the photo
Used when creating a print from a negative.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodging_and_burning
I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"
It's from the Sun-Times photo archive.
I think they did a lot of that in those days — several other photos I have look similar.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Common photo technique when printing
No photoshop back in the day. Pictures came out that way. No doctoring involved
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
no wonder they're so hard!
baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it
by cooliogirl47 on Jan 30, 2010 5:57 PM CST up reply actions
With the umpire
in the background that would indicate to me that it is a double. Most of the time if there is someone on first the ump is in the infield so he can see a steal from the front not behind.
Let go cubs
Those of us of a certain age
learned what “Sesquicentennial” meant in 1968. Hard to believe that just 8 years from now will be Illinois’ bicentennial – and I expect the Cubs and Sox will have patches for that as well.
Let’s hope the Cubs can put the Illinois Bicentennial patch on one sleeve and the “2017 World Champions” patch on the other.
I'd like a "World Series Champions" patch before then, actually. :)
Who cares if he's a Cubs fan? This is a football forum! He is a PACKER fan as well. So, from now until March, I’m sure he’ll dedicate a lot of his time here. In late March, then we can be enemies during the baseball season. Besides, the Cubs have perhaps the most loyal baseball fanbase in the country. You have to respect that.
Go Pack!
by Jabooty on Jan 25, 2010 2:58 PM EST
by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jan 27, 2010 11:15 PM CST up reply actions

by 























