Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Wrigleyville Classic, Northwestern Vs. Illinois: Go West, Young Men

A general view as the Northwestern Wildcats practice for a game against the Illinois Fighting Illini on Saturday November 20 at Wrigley Field on November 18 2010 in Chicago Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)



Yesterday's controversial decision to have all offensive plays in today's Wrigleyville Classic between Northwestern and Illinois head to the west end of the field lies squarely in the lap of the Big Ten, who approved the layout after months of planning.

It does not, in my opinion, make this game a "joke" or "travesty" or "disaster" or any of the other words that were batted around here yesterday. It will disappoint those who had hoped to ballhawk on Sheffield -- and really, there's no reason they couldn't kick field goals and/or extra points in that direction -- but in the end, the two teams will play football. The rule change makes this game unique, and gives it some interest it wouldn't have had before. Admittedly, those who bought tickets on the east side or east end zone -- some paying $150 face value -- have a right to be upset at having seats that they thought would be close to some action and now will find themselves far away from the game.

Not being a college football expert myself, I'll leave it to others to discuss this game and its impact. At SB Nation Chicago, Hilary Lee posts her comments and a forecast for the game. The weather -- partly sunny, temperatures in the mid-40s -- isn't that different from many Cubs April Opening Days.

I know there are many Illini fans here and there will certainly be many clad in orange in Wrigley Field this afternoon. With a graduate degree from Northwestern, I'm rooting for the purple today. Go 'Cats.

Comment 147 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm guessing no.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 8:31 AM CST up reply actions  

i wonder if they

agreed to the teams going one direction on offense only, but waited until all tickets were paid for before announcing it

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 8:52 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Doesn't sound like it.

That would be grounds for a class-action lawsuit, I’d think.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

i didnt think so either

just stirring the pot some

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

GO U NU!!!!

My seats in 416 went from being good to awesome with yesterday’s decision. I’m looking forward to wandering all over the place down there today. Should be fun.

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Nov 20, 2010 8:59 AM CST reply actions  

I'll be in 424.

Anyone at the game, stop on by.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Looks like a pretty good

Turnout for gameday.

by LT on Nov 20, 2010 9:06 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

CubWorld live webcam

At 9:09 the NU band was outside the main entrance.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 9:09 AM CST up reply actions  

good lively crowd there

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 9:11 AM CST up reply actions  

completerly assinine

A burlesque, bullshit, crap, craziness, farce, flapdoodle, folly, foolishness, hot air, idiocy, illogicality, illogicalness, improbability, inanity, incongruity, insanity, irrationality, jazz, jive, ludicrousness, ridiculousness, senselessness, silliness, stupidity, unreasonableness, distortion, farce , imitation, lampoon, libel, mimicry, mockery, parody, pasquinade, pastiche, put-on, ridicule, satire, send-up, sham, takeoff, travesty.

If the stadium is not adequate to hold a NCAA foot ball game than don’t

13- Warner, 23- Sandberg, 40- Tillman, 11- Walter

by TBru on Nov 20, 2010 9:33 AM CST reply actions  

Yes, but the publicity generated for Wrigley Field,

is priceless. The small dimensions re-emphasize the fact that Wrigley Field is a ballpark, not a stadium. It’s national news. I’ve been getting emails and calls from friends and family from coast to coast, wondering if I’m going (they know I live on Addison near the ballpark) — and these are from people who might not even know that Northwestern and Illinois are in the Big Ten.

Alas, I have a prior commitment and can’t go, which is really making me mad.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Nov 20, 2010 9:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Hooray! they know there's a game going on

they also know that it’s completely asinine to be playing a game in a stadium that doesn’t fit.

I can’t believe they waited this long to freaking measure the dimensions

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, but...

…are ya for it or against it?

"I don't care who the manager is OR who they sign in the off-season...I just want a frickin' World Series winner" - Easy Ed

by Easy Ed on Nov 20, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed 1000%.

Disaster.

IF YOU CAN’T PLAY THE GAME AS THE RULES INDICATE, IT’S A DISASTER.

This wasn’t because of some freak accident or weather. It’s because those in charge at all levels were / are idiots.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Nov 20, 2010 3:33 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sorry Al...

….. but this IS a joke. It is hard to fathom anyone involved wouldn’t have realized that Wrigley’s seat configuration had changed since 40 years ago, and that maybe, just maybe, running the football field from right field to third base might not work. It’s undeniable it was a tight fit when the Bears did it (remember, the end zones weren’t even regulation size back THEN), so there must have been a reason why the Bears never tried RF to 3B themselves way back when. In and of itself having this gamne here is a cool, neat idea, but come on, the very next thought someone should have had (because I know I did) was “will this still fit?”.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Nov 20, 2010 10:02 AM CST reply actions  

But here's the deal.

Everyone signed off on it. Changing it 24 hours before the game is ridiculous.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

10,000 X more ridiculous

would have been to put young athletes at risk of serious injury.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

So why did everyone involved sign off on it?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

I wasn't there, so how would I know?

But, that is really beside the point. When they saw just how close that wall was to the back line of the endzone, all bets were off.

There is no quarreling with the decision. Yeah, it’s a shame they didn’t pick it up earlier. It should have dawned on somebody that there is always a problem playing football in a facility designed for baseball and maybe there is a good reason no football games were played in Wrigley in the last 40 years.

Now I read where Ricketts would like UN-Illinois to play in Wrigley every year. Good luck with that.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I assume this won't happen any more, making today unique.

Again, if they had all approved designs, and walked through only a week ago as they said they did, changing it at the last minute seems weaselly to me.

The reasons the Bears left Wrigley Field had more to do with the lack of lights in the early 1970s and the seating capacity — Soldier Field had, at the time, 25,000 more seats — than with anything to do with the field layout.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:35 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't assume that they are being weasels

My guess is that the people who were doing the review of the field layout and who signed off on it were people who don’t really understand the nuances of how football is played today.

All teams now have red zone passing plays that involve crossing routes that are designed to go right to the back of the end zone. Not to mention fade routes that involve leaping over the shoulder catches while running full speed thru the end zone

I’m guessing it was only when one of the coaches got a look at the field that a red flag went up.

I’m also sure they spent some considerable time kicking around potential solutions to the problem before they went public with it.

But, you can rest assured that going ahead and playing a normal end to end game under those field conditions was never considered a possibility once the problem was identified.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Well, maybe.

NU coach Pat Fitzgerald had already mentioned he had different game plans for each end zone. My guess is that had they left it alone, coaches wouldn’t have run passing plays into that end zone, or at least not into that area.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at this

Don’t run pass plays at one end of the field? If people think only using one end zone is a corruption of the game, their heads would explode over this.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

C'mon, this was such a fantastic idea!

Don’t be so negative! It will give us more money to spend on all of the free agents that we’re going to sign this offseason! Give them a break!

by TheGrinch13 on Nov 20, 2010 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

speaking of money

did you make the donation for The Jake Fox Challenge

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

I donated my money to the Cubs!

I wanted them to be able to pay their electricity bill!

by TheGrinch13 on Nov 20, 2010 11:27 AM CST up reply actions  

meaning you did not make it

all that talk and you skip out on it, well done.

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

it's not about nuances

or passing plays or red zone offense.

the ncaa requires that you provide a six foot "buffer around the field and that that buffer area be free from obstructions.

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

B.S. B.S. B.S.
My guess is that the people who were doing the review of the field layout and who signed off on it were people who don’t really understand the nuances of how football is played today.

No nuances here. There are minimum NCAA field dimensions. can you fit the fit at Wrigley or not? End of story.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Since the NCAA also signed off on this some time ago

I’m not sure I get your point.

I do get that B.S. B.S. B.S. is something I would expect out of someone about 10 years old.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 12:03 PM CST up reply actions  

There are no nuances to this

The field size is the field size. Measure twice, paint once.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 12:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know why I bother

You guys are really dense. Nuances of the game

My speculation, which I think is pretty viable, is that the people who signed off on this field configuration ahead of time were administrators or other people that aren’t coaches. The danger of having a wall right behind the end zone was not picked up because you need to understand how the game is played and the type of plays that are run to appreciate that.

I would bet it was when one of the coaches saw that wall that he said “if we run a fade route, someone is going to get hurt”, or something like that.

Jeez, get a life.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm not sure why you bother either

you don’t need to understand the nuances of the game to understand that if you need to have six feet of open space around the field, having a wall six inches from the field isn’t going to cut it, no matter how much ivy-imprinted padding you put on it.

you speculation isn’t viable.

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

You are clueless

I just pointed out that the NCAA signed off on this like a year ago, so clearly they decided to waive the six foot requirement.

My speculation is not only viable, it makes perfect sense, which cannot be said about your posts.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

wrong

everyone knew it was an issue. they knew it affected the “nuances of the game” and were going to try work around it. obviously it was decided that they couldn’t risk the liability.

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

seems to me administrators or other people who aren't coaches...

…yet are in a position of authority whereas they can sign off on something like this are people who understand the nuances of rules and requirements.

I’d like to hear your speculation on why these non-coaches types went ahead and signed off on this event. Do you think they were not aware of the 6 foot requirement? Or if they were, why do you think they chose to ignore/waive it?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 20, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh no

Probably the French Poetry professor!

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I think they clearly

made a conscious decision to waive the requirement. How could you conclude anything else?

Why? Because it is a unique venue and everyone got caught up in the excitement of staging the game.

And yes, unless you really understand the game or have played it, you do not realize what is at stake. Most of the people posting here do not get it…even after it is explained to them.

Most NCAA and Big Ten officials that would look at this either didn’t think about or didn’t realize the risk involved.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

you took a good post and had to throw an insult into it

which is a shame

And yes, unless you really understand the game or have played it, you do not realize what is at stake. Most of the people posting here do not get it

that is based 100% on your opinion, and you will not only state it as fact, but I am sure try to argue til the Cows come home to prove it.

you are not ignorant, but when you have to take jabs at people in the process, they jab back. so my advice would be to avoid your own jab throwing at people and i am sure that will help others not to take jabs at you (and that goes both ways)

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

point, counterpoint

i think they clearly made a conscious decision to waive the requirement. How could you conclude anything else? they clearly changed their mind. no one has concluded anything else

Why? Because it is a unique venue and everyone got caught up in the excitement of staging the game. because they are going to make a lot of money

And yes, unless you really understand the game or have played it, you do not realize what is at stake. Most of the people posting here do not get it…even after it is explained to them. the land of lincoln trophy and bowl eligibility?

Most NCAA and Big Ten officials that would look at this either didn’t think about or didn’t realize the risk involved. only i, azjazzman, realize that this decision is really about being able to run fade routes in the endzone

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm going with Northwestern athletic director Jim Phillips statement over your conjecture

From the ESPN link that circuitclout posted:

“I know both staffs are aware of it,” Phillips (Northwestern athletic director Jim Phillips) said. "From the very beginning, the players’ safety was paramount. That’s what took us the longest time. We had risk managers here; we had civil engineers, safety engineers. We had so many people look at it because nobody wants or wanted to put the student-athlete at harm’s way at a riskier type of environment.

We vetted it through all the experts at both universities and felt everyone was comfortable with the dimensions.”

Everybody from NU and IL was made aware of the east end zone.

Bottomline: They got cold feet.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 8:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd

I’d like to see azjazzman at my local watering hole pulling his antics. Those glasses he wears would likely be a permanent attachment to his face.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Nov 20, 2010 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I would love to see that also

In fact I would love to run into you anywhere, anytime. I’m pretty sure your internet tough guy act would disappear pretty quickly. And if it didn’t, I’d be happy to remove it for you.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok I'm in Mesa

Every 3rd week of March for Spring Training. I’ll be at Diamonds (the old sluggos) every afternoon/evening that week. In addition, anytime you find yourself in Albuquerque, I’d be glad to make your aquaintance…with my fist. #1 your’re alot older than I am, and #2 I’m a competative runner, who hits the gym 6 days a week. I’ll have hit you and moved on before your skull hits the ground.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Nov 21, 2010 8:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Knock it off.

Threats of physical violence? Really?

Stop now.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 21, 2010 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Al

My apologies, he started it, and chose to go there.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Nov 21, 2010 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks.

I honestly don’t care who started the threats of physical violence. They will not be tolerated here. Ever.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 21, 2010 9:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Alright

Probably pretty stupid for me to have even responded. I can’t believe that douchebag is still allowed on this site. He seems to be on a mission to make even the most reasonable people on this blog upset.

"Ask Dad. He'll know. And on the off chance he doesn't, he'll make something up"

by StevenABQ on Nov 21, 2010 9:11 AM CST up reply actions  

channel that anger into laughter

Try to imagine that his mission is to amuse us all and I think you’ll see his posts in a whole new light.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 21, 2010 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry Beer Cub

but it is others that cannot have a discussion without resorting to juvenile insults not me. You are mistaken about who it is that is a complete dick. And that level of name calling just proves my point.

When you respond to a cogent point by saying: “B.S. B.S. B.S.” you get a response in kind.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Blow it out your ass

You’re just proving the point I made, in spades. I said I was surprised no one has beat the shit out of you. You know, the generic “no one”. You then, proving my point, offer to actually fight people here. Why you aren’t banned is a mystery.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Nov 20, 2010 1:46 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

Flagged.

Of all the things I’ve seen you say, threatening to beat someone is probably the worst.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Possibly hiking up Mount Marcy during the weekend of October 23-24. State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Nov 21, 2010 6:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Unacceptable.

There’s no way threats of violence are EVER acceptable here.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 21, 2010 8:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Somebody got cold feet.

That’s all. They knew what the restrictions were. They put up specially designed (and advertised) 6 inch padding.

Maybe Pat Fitzgerald said something. But not based on his comments from Thursday’s walk-through.

Not Ron Zook – he did not see the field until Friday after the announcement.

Then again, this is not the first time the 6 foot rule has been broken and Pat Fitzgerald said that himself.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

answer: because they are going to make a lot of money

if they couldn’t have the game at wrigley the cubs weren’t in position to make a lot of money off the game and NW wouldn’t have been able to dramatically increase season ticket sales. so they had every reason to sign off on it, if they didn’t, there would be no game, and they wouldn’t make nearly as much money playing at ryan field.

it involves some speculation but it’s not hard to figure out that they knew the field didn’t fit and was potentially dangerous but they didn’t care because they were all going to make so much money. but when people starting asking questions and it became clear that the field didn’t provide the buffer required by the ncaa the powers that be realized that they would be liable if a player got hurt. recent tragic events at rutgers and notre dame have put an increased spotlight on player safety so they couldn’t get away with the “it’s old time football” excuse. so instead, they’ll play “losers walk” and hope no one fumbles into the RF end zone. and they still get to make their money, even while people watch a college football game played with pickup rules.

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 11:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Honest Answer?

Because whoever was involved was too stupid to any kind of foresight. No other answer.

"When they signed Fukudome, I knew they were trying to get me fired". - Ron Santo, January, 2008

by BeerCub on Nov 20, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

or they had green eyes

and didnt consider it a problem

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

And that's why it's a joke

and the solution to this dilemma, while probably the best that could be hoped for given the circumstances, is also a joke.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 20, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

The solution is a joke.

The adjusted game plans that were mentioned for the east end zone surely would have worked — most likely, no pass routes were going to be run into that end zone anyway.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

What???

I’m almost afraid to ask, but could you clarify this?

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I read your comment above.

As I noted, NU coach Pat Fitzgerald said he had different red zone game plans for each end zone, to adjust for the conditions.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

That is nuts

Unless this is an exhibition game where nobody cares who wins or loses, that just simply is beyond the pale.

That would be like the coach of the Bulls saying he won’t allow any of his players to dunk, because they might hurt themselves.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

doe this mean we should not hold out hope of the Super Bowl at Wrigley?

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually I could envision

a Super Bowl being played there before a world series.

by troutfishin on Nov 20, 2010 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I realize you are being facetious

but given the fact that the NFL has a requirement that the stadium that hosts the Super Bowl seat a minimum of 70,000…

If Tom Ricketts has Super Bowl fever, he’d better revisit that renovation.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Facetious yes, but as I commented

below, there is no way that future football events will be held at Wrigley without expanding the playing surface, and by where Cubs are currently located that won’t happen.

by troutfishin on Nov 20, 2010 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

The NCAA also has a requirement about buffer zones...

…yet they decided to play at Wrigley anyway.

From this espn.com article

NCAA rules state the field dimensions must have adequate space surrounding the playing surface: “Limit lines shall be marked … 12 feet outside the sidelines and the end lines, except in stadiums where total field surface does not permit. In these stadiums, the limit lines shall not be less than 6 feet from the sidelines and end lines.”

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 20, 2010 11:32 AM CST up reply actions  

ESPN game day said it was 6 feet

either way, its a lot more than what WF offers and they all knew it

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

they didnt make the statement as you did

which clarifies it well (should have added above)

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions  

how can the game not be a joke

if the solution is a joke? i agree, they should have stuck with the original plan of playing “wall is out” instead of the new solution, “loser walks.”

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

errrr, that would have made the game even more of a joke.

Having to tailor your gameplan because one end of the stadium is smaller than the other would have been beyond ridiculous.

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Stupid Big 10

Thanks the new conference alignment, we won’t get to play the Illini anymore. Because, as we used to say, it’s not much of a rivalry, but it’s the only one we have.

Where is Mick Kelleher when we need him?

by 3744nsheffield on Nov 20, 2010 10:10 AM CST reply actions  

"We" being Northwestern?

Because you’re wrong if that’s who you are talking about.

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

ESPNU

Check local listings.

It’s not a joke. So the ball gets moved. The players still have to play the game.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm joking, sir.

No harm intended to anybody’s reputation.

Writing quality posts since 1931.

by chilango2 on Nov 20, 2010 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree...

the ONLY people to really have a bitch are the ones sitting in the “wrong” end zone. It’s still 10 yards, 6 points, extra points, punts, defense and offense. I’m not a College football fan at all, but, am intrigued enough to watch this game.

"I don't care who the manager is OR who they sign in the off-season...I just want a frickin' World Series winner" - Easy Ed

by Easy Ed on Nov 20, 2010 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's the problem, you admit that you aren't a college football fan

but then say it’s not a problem. This would be like if Selig decided that in the All-star game, the players were not going to have to run the bases if they hit a homerun due to time constraints. Then someone who isn’t a baseball fan comes on and goes, “what’s the problem”

The game is still basically the same but it is a big change and a silly one.

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

It IS a joke.

Sorry, but it is. This was poor planning to the extreme

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

The real JOKE is that this game is only on ESPNU.

I live a mile from the park and have Comcast extended digital cable, and they’re showing me Virginia Tech vs. Miami and the Stanford game. I believe most people in Chicago don’t get ESPNU unless they have some sort of satellite provider.

I mean, really. That IS a joke.

by pinkpony on Nov 20, 2010 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe you should have signed up

For Uverse. :P

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Nov 20, 2010 4:01 PM CST up reply actions  

ESPNU for the game

ESPN has Gameday on currently from WF

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

true

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Erin...

…looked like she wished she was back in FL.

by thermal54 on Nov 20, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll start this off: I L L!

Go Illini! Beat the backup quarterback!

Vic Koenning is my homeboy.

by pygreg on Nov 20, 2010 10:48 AM CST reply actions  

The Big 10 knew about the field

for the months and they decide at the last minute to only use the one end zone. The Big 10 didn’t figure out the end zone in right field was close to the wall and the potential danger until this week? This had to reviewed almost a year in advance. That’s what the NHL does for the the winter classic.

This season, the Eagles were thinking of having the game against the Green Bay Packers played at Franklin Field in honor of the 1960 NFL championship team. It never happened for a number of reasons. Eagles have more season ticket holders than what Franklin Field holds, lack of bathrooms, where to sit the people who have luxury boxes and club seats, and the NFL wasn’t thrilled about the idea.

by PhillyCub on Nov 20, 2010 10:54 AM CST reply actions  

Al you have a talent for spin

“The rule change makes this game unique, and gives it some interest it wouldn’t have had before.”

If you don’t have a job in this dept., someone should give you one.

by troutfishin on Nov 20, 2010 11:08 AM CST reply actions  

Trying to make the best of it instead of complaining and bitching.

Just sayin’.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Is that your job, to make the best of it

by now even you have to start acknowledging that if the Cubs organization wants to keep hosting some of these events it might be time to start thinking about a new and improved home. The solution cannot and will not come from stadium renovations because they can’t expand the playing surface. At the very least this is embarrassing for Ricketts.

by troutfishin on Nov 20, 2010 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Talk is cheap, money is not, so this won't happen

See ya for baseball at Wrigley Field next summer and the summers after that…

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Right.

That was the first indoor game in NFL history. Played there because the Wrigley Field surface was unplayable.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Too bad

Wrigley could have hosted the World Series and the NFL playoff game in the same year. Was it an NFL Championship game? Has that ever happened?

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

1963 NFL Championship Game

was at WF, sadly the Cubs were just a bit short of the WS that season lol

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

My dad had two tickets to that game.

My brother and I flipped a coin to see who would go. I lost.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Nov 20, 2010 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

man, that sucks.

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:32 AM CST up reply actions  

get a club lol

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

in that case

hire a club of people lol

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

reminds me of the story i heard about a coworker of my dads (since retired)

was a kid in 1945 and his parents promised to take him to the next Cubs WS cus he was too young to go in 1945

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 12:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, at least the Bears have made it back to the "Championship Game" since.

But I haven’t been able to go to either of those, either.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Nov 20, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

It was called a "playoff game" because it determined final season standings.

But it was a de facto championship because the NFL “champ” was determined by standings. First place team was declared the champions.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Nov 20, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

how many stadiums have hosted

NFL, NHL and NBA championships?

Chicago Stadium did, as noted above, but did any other?

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I meant

has a stadium ever hosted the World Series and the NFL Championship in the same year.

by azjazzman on Nov 20, 2010 11:30 AM CST reply actions  

1956 Yankee Stadium. Giants NFL, beat the Bears, and Dodgers vs. Yankees.

Also Yankee Stadium, 1958 and 1962. Don’t you just love NY?

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Nov 20, 2010 11:39 AM CST up reply actions  

Depends on what you mean by same year

If you mean same “season”, then the Metrodome in 1991 would qualify.

Twins won the 1991 World Series there and the 1991 NFL season finished with the Redskins beating the Bills in Super Bowl 26, though technically that game was played in 1992 (January 26).

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 20, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

in the same thinking

different stadium, same block…

Rangers played WS down the block from where this seasons SB will be played

Chronologically inept since 2060
"I could be writing this crap!" -- Crow T. Robot
Me: Q: I can run but not walk. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
Wrigster A: Theriot

by Cubbie-Tim on Nov 20, 2010 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Somebody start up the Right Field Sucks! chant

Because for this game, it will be hard to fire a comeback from the Right Field bleachers.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Nov 20, 2010 11:48 AM CST reply actions  

RF ticketholders

really got it up the anoose with this decision. Other than that, it’s an amateur football game. So what if they head west.

by thermal54 on Nov 20, 2010 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Go 'Cats!

If DeRo could hit Reed Johnson with 60 yard bombs from the 3B line to RF, why can’t two major college football teams do the same thing? Am I missing something?

"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007

by DeRoMyHero on Nov 20, 2010 12:35 PM CST reply actions  

other than relevance?

I don’t even get this comparison

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Because you're not allowed to throw the ball toward RF

Special Wrigley Field ground rule. (Also: If the ball gets stuck in the ivy, it automatically reverts to second down.)

by The Deputy Mayor of Rush Street on Nov 20, 2010 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

If the organization is serious about hosting football in the future, then it can be worked out in the renovation. The third base stands/dugout could be modified to give the outfield end zone the necessary room.

Of course, such modifications would be contingent on Northwestern agreeing to play more games in the future. A more likely solution would involve convincing DePaul to renew its football program and use Wrigley as its full-time home.

The family may well have to get creative to finance its goals for the park.

by bourbon_and_branch on Nov 20, 2010 2:04 PM CST reply actions  

depaul

should probably renew its basketball program before it even thinks of renewing its football program.

by circuitclout on Nov 20, 2010 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Just one example and then I'm letting it go.

People say: “what’s the problem with going the same direction for both teams?”

The problem is that football, unlike any other sport, involves the elements. You PLAN for the elements. At the coin toss, the team who loses the toss is given the option of taking one side of the field or the other and usually base that choice on which way the wind is blowing and what way it will be blowing in the 2nd and 4th quarters. It’s a strategic advantage that is being taken away thanks to poor planning by the Big Ten.

Think I’m making too big a deal about this? Find some tape of the Nebraska-Iowa State game two weeks ago. The wind was HOWLING one direction, and in the fourth quarter with the game tied and the wind blowing in their faces, Nebraska had to basically play for overtime because they didn’t want to risk kicking a fieldgoal into the wind (or throwing into the wind for that matter) and giving Iowa State good field position.

Now, I have no idea what the wind is doing in Wrigley today, and that wouldn’t be the point even if there was ZERO wind.

This decisions removed an important part of the game. That’s why its a joke

"Oh Crap"
-Famous Last Words by General George Custer

by BoVandy on Nov 20, 2010 2:47 PM CST reply actions  

I understand your reasoning.

But I still think you’re making too big a deal about it.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 8:19 PM CST up reply actions  

"Ride the Wild Wind II"?

And at the end of one, it’s the Phillies 7, the Cubs 6.

I mean the Fighting Illini 21, the Wildcats 14.

by The Deputy Mayor of Rush Street on Nov 20, 2010 3:24 PM CST reply actions  

What's up kids?

More folks in Wrigley than at any time in the month of September? I think so…

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Nov 20, 2010 3:39 PM CST reply actions  

At least Wrigley was open for sports fans in November ...

God, I would love to have been there just to walk through the place and stare at it through the keyhole even ..

Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we shall go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..

coda

ELO, 1975

by cubnational on Nov 20, 2010 4:16 PM CST reply actions  

Great job Illini!

Whipped those kitties and sent ’em home pouting. Take that, Al!

Starlin Castro singles on a pop up to catcher Jason LaRue.
Ryan Theriot scores. Two out -Gameday 7/23/10

by Sandberg's evil twin on Nov 20, 2010 5:51 PM CST reply actions  

Sigh.

If only the Wildcats had remembered how to play defense.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Tempest in a teapot

Great game, wonderful publicity, kudos to Mikel LeShoure (who went to high school with my son).

Surprised no one in this thread mentioned the graphic the broadcast showed of the field for the game being played in Yankee Stadium today. It, too had less than 6 feet just on each edge of both end zones.

No one should be untouchable on this roster unless his name is Eliot Ness...or Starlin Castro.

by cubzfan on Nov 20, 2010 7:53 PM CST reply actions  

100% agreed.

See my game recap for more.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Nov 20, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  984 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima