The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #93 Hank Wyse
Following Art "Solly" Hofman's No. 97 profile yesterday, here is another in a six-part offseason series this year in which I revisited the rankings of the top 100 Cubs of all time, originally done in the winter of 2006-07. In addition to six new profiles (the first was Jon Lieber, the new #100 on Nov. 29), I'll be revising the profiles of the four active players on this list (Kerry Wood, Aramis Ramirez, Carlos Zambrano and Derrek Lee) over the winter. Also, at this time there aren't any photos of Hank Wyse available that I have permission to post. If anyone does, send it to me and I'll post it with this profile.
Hank Wyse was born in Lunsford, Arkansas on March 1, 1918 and signed with the Cubs in 1940. After a couple of years in the minor leagues he made his Cubs debut on September 7, 1942 and it appeared he was on his way to a fine Cubs career -- except it was partly derailed when he suffered a back injury when he fell off a welding platform while working in the offseason in a war plant in Miami, Oklahoma. The injury gave him 4-F draft status during the war, so he was one of the few players in the primes of their careers who were not eligible for military service. He also had to wear a corset while he pitched.
Wyse was a part-time starter and part-time reliever (15 starts, 23 relief appearances) in 1943 -- that during an era when the roles were different than they are now; many pitchers would spot-start and throw out of the bullpen between those starts. Then in 1944 he became a mainstay of the Cubs' rotation, going 16-15 but with a 3.15 ERA, and in 1945 was one of the best pitchers in the National League, finishing 22-10, ranking fifth in NL ERA at 2.68 and second in NL WAR at 5.1. He was selected to the All-Star team but no game was played due to wartime travel restrictions; it was his only All-Star selection. He also finished seventh in MVP voting in those pre-Cy Young Award days. On April 28, 1945 he took a no-hitter into the eighth inning against the Pirates; Bill Salkeld broke it up with one out. At the time no Cub had thrown a no-hitter in 28 years and it would be ten more seasons before Sam Jones would break that drought.
Wyse's 20-win season in 1945 made him the only Cubs pitcher with a 20-win season between 1940 (Claude Passeau, 20) and 1963 (Dick Ellsworth, 22).
In the 1945 World Series Wyse started and lost Game Two, 4-1; that loss tied the series 1-1. For some inexplicable reason, manager Charlie Grimm wouldn't go back to his second-best starting pitcher behind Hank Borowy to start the rest of the series. Borowy had started Game One (and won), and Claude Passeau, at 36 still solid but aging, started and shut out the Tigers in Game Three on one hit. Ray Prim, who at 38 had led the NL in ERA, started and lost Game Four; the Series was now tied at two games each.
It made sense to start Borowy in Game Five, but when he lost and the Cubs needed a win in Game Six, Grimm turned back to Passeau instead of Wyse. The game went into extra innings and Borowy was used in relief, as were Wyse and Prim. The latter two pitched poorly and allowed the game to be tied; Borowy heroically threw four relief innings only a day after starting Game Five.
The Cubs won the game in the 12th inning, tying the Series again. Wyse would have been the logical choice to start Game Seven, but Grimm, apparently not trusting him after his poor outing in Game Six, went with Borowy. You know what happened next. To his dying day, Wyse always claimed that the Cubs would have won the 1945 World Series if Grimm had started him instead of Borowy.
Wyse pitched well in 1946 but declined in 1947, possibly suffering the effects of the back injury. The Cubs sold him to an independent minor league team in Shreveport, Louisiana on May 10, 1949; he pitched a couple of mediocre years for the Philadelphia Athletics and Washington Senators and retired from the major leagues after 1951. He pitched three more years in the minor leagues before retiring to private life in Oklahoma; he died in Pryor, Oklahoma, aged 82, on October 22, 2000.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Like Hal Newhouser, Hank pitched almost as well against the stars returning from WWII in 1946...
…as he had against the 4-F competition he dominated in ’45, posting a 2.68 ERA in both years. His Fergie-like 23/34 CG stat in ’45 is most impressive.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Has nothing to do with the topic but I have a question....
The Cubs 1969 jersey, is it an off white color or is it an actual white?
United we stand and united we'll fall......down on our knees the day we win it all!
by Bricks and Ivy on Dec 12, 2010 10:54 AM CST reply actions
It's a bit off-white...
… not the bright white we know today. If I can find a color photo, I’ll post it.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
when I was growing up in the 60's and 70's, we always heard how the Cubs hadnt won a pennant since 1945
but nowadays, the drought since ‘45 is rarely mentioned. It has become all about 1908. Had Wyse started and won Game 7 in ’45, it wouldn’t have impacted me, since I wasn’t born yet, but at least we would “only” be taunted about the 63 year drought. and we wouldnt have to hear about that stupid goat.
ask not what the Cubs can do for you - ask what you can do for the Cubs.
The "'08" business is a recent development, an inevitable byproduct of MLB adopting NFL-style playoffs and marketing strategy.
As baseball, like other professional sports, stages multiple-round, end-of-season tournaments that involve several division champs and wild cards, the only team that gets remembered at the finish is the one that wins it all.
To test this theory, try recalling the last five or 10 teams to lose the Super Bowl. I don’t know about you, but I can’t even name the team that lost two years ago. In the NFL, NHL, and NBA, regular seasons have evolved into little more than exhibitions and elimination tournaments that lead to the all-important multiple rounds of playoffs often won by also-rans who then are designated “Champions.”
Baseball, with its rich tradition of teams that fairly won league championships after a 154 or 162-game struggle, held off on the idea of crowning “cheese champs” until TV money became too important to ignore. Rest assured, 15 or 20 years ago very few Cubs fans knew anything about 1908. Now that National League pennants have been devalued, 1908 is more famous in Cubdom than 1927, 1961, or 1998 in Yankeeland.
Besides, there is more marketing magic in the phrase “103 years” than there is in “66 years,” and, as we know, the Cubs can get dangerously close to actually winning a league pennant. Count on it, if the Cubs actually get into the World Series and lose in the next few years, the monkey will still be on our backs, with no letup from media or MLB with its consistent mantra: “Still losers! 105 years and counting!”
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
being in the World Series and losing would kind of take the monkey off the back,
At least for me. Of course I want the whole thing, but would still prefer a pennant over no pennant, just to see them IN the W.S.. Baby steps here. In 2003, we actually won a playoff round. In 2003-2004, we had back to back winning seasons for the first time in 30 years. In 2008, we were in the postseason in back to back years for the first time in a century. We are getting there, s-l-o-w-l-y.
ask not what the Cubs can do for you - ask what you can do for the Cubs.
by holy mackeral on Dec 13, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions
Absolutely, at this point I won't get greedy. One World Series appearence will be enough for me.
Just the idea of having defeated long-time rivals like the Cards and Dodgers, along with all the expansion franchises that have so bedeviled us, will be a baseball thrill-of-a-lifetime. As long as the Cubs don’t embarrass us as victims of a World Series sweep by the Oklahoma City Mariners or some other expansion team from what Royko used to call a “crummy minor league town like Oakland,” I’m good with it.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Were his fans know as "Wyse-guys"?
Ba-da-boom. Ching!
There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary and there are 108 stitches in a baseball. Who says baseball isn't a religion?
Still a hot topic
When I was growing up in Chicago in the 1950s, this was still a hot topic of discussion—what if Wyse had started game 7? I didn’t think much of that talk at the time. Just some old-timers gassing about ancient stuff. It has become a bit more meaningful as time has passed. Borowy was an excellent pitcher. But Charlie Grimm’s hunch was almost certainly wrong.
I remember similar conversations. Now that we've seen a few games,
including the legendary Red Sox-Reds Game 6 in ‘75, it’s easy to imagine the letdown the Cubs may have excperienced following their inspiring 12-inning victory in Game 6 of the ‘45 Series. Just like the Red Sox after Fisk’s home run, the Cubs were playing with house money and Grimm, like Darell Johnson years later, played the wrong hunch in choosing a starter.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Off-topic
but does anyone know a good baseball website with stories chronicling baseball from year to year? I remember Ballhawk replied to a comment with a website a month or two back but no I can’t remember it. Thanks!
"I don't know what the big deal about Crackerjack is"
by theGraceyslumpbuster on Dec 13, 2010 11:07 AM CST reply actions
really off topic but...
it just dawned on me, and maybe it has already it been touched on in a previous write up sometime, but could the Cubs maybe be setting up to make a run at Albert Pujols when he becomes a free agent.
I mean the fact that they sign Carlos Pena to a one year deal when they could have got someone like Adam LaRoche for a multi year contract and then throw in the fact that Fukudome’s contract finally runs out at the close of this year I believe (correct me if I’m wrong).
I mean these two things will definitely free up some cap space.
It’s just speculation on my point, and maybe it has been speculated on here before, but I don’t think you can not really think about it as an option.
And who knows maybe Pujols wants to come to Chicago.
Just an observation.

by 

























