A Brief History of Cubs Ownership
As many of you already know, I contributed the article "A Fresh Start: One Fan's Hopes for the Ricketts Family" to the 2010 Maple Street Press Cubs Annual. (Go ahead and laugh. I'll wait.) My original draft included a section reviewing all of the Cubs' previous owners. I wound up cutting the section for space purposes, but I'd like to share it here with you all.
Maybe you already know this stuff, or perhaps you have only a vague idea of who owned the team before the Wrigleys. In any case, enjoy and let me know what you think. (Any history geeks out there can, of course, feel free to point out mistakes or oversights.) I've also included a poll - mostly for laughs.
The first recognized owner of the team that would become the Cubs is generally regarded as William Hulbert, who invested in the then-dormant club in 1874. Hulbert, often referred to as “Savior of the Game” for his role in creating both the “reserve clause” (which bound players under contract to their teams indefinitely) and the National League, owned the team until his death in 1882.
At that time, one of Hulbert’s original co-investors, Albert Spalding, took over. As you may have guessed, Spalding founded the sporting goods business that still exists today.
Spalding hung on until 1902, when, after suffering through the poorly handled rise of the competing American League, he sold off his interests to the team that could now more or less be called “the Cubs.” His buyer, James Hart, was a man who’d already been involved with the team’s ownership.
Hart didn’t stick around long either, selling the team off to Charles Murphy after the 1905 season for a mere $125,000. Murphy procured some of that sum thanks to Charles Taft, a brother of the 27th President of the United States. Murphy’s years as owner were some of the team’s finest. The Cubs appeared in the 1906, 1907, 1908 and 1910 World Series — winning the ‘07 and ‘08 contests.
Taft continued bankrolling the team as he eventually repurchased the team from Murphy in 1914. As the Great War raged, Taft and a group of investors ran the club for only a couple years before selling out to another group led by former Federal League honcho Charles Weeghman in 1916 — the man who built (what would later be called) Wrigley Field.
And that brings us to the name Wrigley. Weeghman didn’t last much longer than Thomas, selling most of his stock to William Wrigley Jr. in 1918, at least partly because of mounting gambling debts. Wrigley became full owner in 1921.
The Wrigley family owned the Cubs for 63 years. The elder Wrigley held a great passion for the team. During his tenure, the Cubs had a number of winning seasons and five World Series berths. When William Wrigley’s son, Phillip K., took over following his father’s death in 1932, the Cubs continued generally playing well for the remainder of that decade.
But, following their last World Series appearance in 1945, Phillip increasingly ran the team more as a business venture than a competitive sports organization. He died in 1977and was succeeded by his son, William, who eventually sold out to the Chicago Tribune in 1981.
The Tribune Co. was, obviously, a large business with little discernible passion for the team and a confusing management structure that made it difficult to hold anyone accountable for the team’s failures. Yet, for all its corporate machinations, good ole TribCo could’ve done worse. The company did gradually elevate the team’s payroll and, whether because of that or other reasons, the Cubs made six playoff appearances during its 28-year reign. That’s markedly better than its zero postseason appearances during the previous 36 years.
On Opening Day 2007, the Tribune announced the team was up for sale. The corporate giant had recently been bought buy real estate magnate Sam Zell, who added TribCo to his portfolio and soon directed it into bankruptcy proceedings. The sale was a lengthy, difficult affair but the Ricketts family, who were early favorites, eventually won out. They held a press conference announcing their ownership on Oct. 30, 2009.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
62 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If P.K. Wrigley gets any votes in your poll, there's something wrong.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
too late - I already cast my vote for TribCo/Zell
I just wanted to see 100% next to that choice, if only for a brief moment. Shoulda taken a picture…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
i have to agree with you ballhawk
I voted them also, and for one reason. in my life 5 playoff appearances all under their watch. like them or not, the Cubs got more in that time than any other owner did during a living members of my families life under another ownership
Wait for it....POUND SAND Without me this board is Al Yellon talking to himself.....................by BLou
True enough.
Actually, if you are 25 years old or older, that’s six playoff appearances, not five (1984, 1989, 1998, 2003, 2007, 2008).
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
brain fart
you are correct, 6 in my lifetime.
Wait for it....POUND SAND Without me this board is Al Yellon talking to himself.....................by BLou
It's pretty well known he had no idea how to run a baseball team
only a business – it’s a shame that he was responsible for the team for so long.
I'll vote for Murphy
But only because the 1907 team was the most dominant team in the history of baseball. Of course, the man was no saint, but he did preside over some very, very good squads.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
The 1998 Yankees would like to have a word with you.
Sure, the 1907 Cubs were dominant. But the 1998 Yankees had an identical regular season winning percentage and had to win three postseason series, which they did, going 11-2.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I'll take a shortstop fight to settle the debate
1907 Joe Tinker vs. 1998 Derek Jeter – who you got?
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
In a fight?
Tinker.
For baseball play? Jeter.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Thanks, man
Japanese steakhouse later.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Murphy inherited that team
The guy was a clown.
by Josh Timmers on Feb 17, 2010 5:55 PM CST up reply actions
just curious
how can the Ricketts be voted as a favorite owner when they have not been involved for one regular season game yet?
Wait for it....POUND SAND Without me this board is Al Yellon talking to himself.....................by BLou
I voted for Ricketts, and I'll own up to my vote.
I’m 25 years old, and I had a lot of back and forth on what to do. I was not going to vote for an owner I did not live through – I have done lots of research, but I find it so difficult to understand the time frame unless it was lived through.
I saw (granted many of the years as a young fan) almost the entire reign of the Tribune. They did put us to 6 playoff appearances, but … I feel they sold way short of the potential in Chicago. I love Hawk, but I hate that we have to remember the fact that he was MVP on a last place team. We had Ryno, Grace, Sosa, Dunston, Maddux, Hawk and could never put anything around them to push forward. I just cant respect an owner that is a business before a fan (hey, if you can make money, great – but DONT buy a professional sports team to get rich, do it because you LOVE the team).
I’ve only seen a few months of Rickett’s owning the team, but I love what he stands for. He’s a passionate Cubs fan, he wants to save Wrigley, and is acting on it, he wants to reinvest profits back to the team, he longs to win the world series. I am ready for this change – regardless of the difficulty of the transition. It is something Chicago has needed for a LONG time.
good points!
baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it
by cooliogirl47 on Feb 17, 2010 7:10 PM CST up reply actions
i was not saying it was right or wrong to vote him
was just curious why and you make a valid argument for it. I agree that the Trib wasnt not the best ever, but like you i would not vote for one i dont remember (I was both a few years prior to the Trib, but not enough to remember that time). I didnt want to vote Ricketts as I believe they need to prove to me first that they will be better over time.and that left one choice for me.
Wait for it....POUND SAND Without me this board is Al Yellon talking to himself.....................by BLou
Fair enough.
But the poll is “favorite Cubs owner” not “best Cubs owner.” I can pick a new band as my “favorite” even though I have no idea of whether they’ll turn out to be the best of all time.
yeah, how did The Knack work out for you there, daver?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Ouch
You realize that besides being daver’s favorite band, the Knack’s lead singer just passed away (from cancer)?
yep and no disrespect was intended
I had just heard about that so The Knack was near the top of my RAM brain cells.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
makes sense
I was disappointed in the linked obit. It didn’t say what he’d been doing the last 31 years.
i agree 100% with your thought
and was just saying why I voted as i did.
Wait for it....POUND SAND Without me this board is Al Yellon talking to himself.....................by BLou
They are my favorite because I know them personally
and have never met any of the other owners. I know how much they love the Cubs and that excites and encourages me as a fan. Their baseball decisions will obviously need time to be measured, but I’ll gladly admit to blind rah-rah favoritism here.
"There's more to life than profits...like, you know, slurpees and stuff." ~Randy Marsh
Hart didn’t stick around long either, selling the team off to Charles Murphy after the 1905 season
Charlie Murphy!
That was cold blooded.
And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.
"Hart didn’t stick around long either, selling the team off to Charles Murphy after the 1905 season"
I’m confused. The above makes it sound like Spalding was a short-term owner, but he owned the team for 20 years which was most of its history at that point. And there was a lot of colorful history packed into those 20 years. But, it’s not clear that’s what you meant so…
also
“Taft continued bankrolling the team as he eventually repurchased the team from Murphy in 1914.”
Repurchased?
Let me look into these points.
Unfortunately, I did all this research back in December (or was it November?), so I don’t have any of my materials handy. About the brevity, I’d just reiterate that this is just a thumbnail sketch.
You invited nitpicking from history geeks
but I don’t really qualify, I’m just a generic geek and nitpicker, so no need to consult the files!
And I didn’t complain about the brevity of the timelime, I knew it was a thumbnail. It was the word “either”, which implied Spalding wasn’t the owner for very long, that I had quarrel with. Not a big deal!
Hart
Hart was actually running the team from 1892 or so. Hart was kind of a Smithers to Spaldings Mr. Burns, following him around and hoping to take over his business holdings after he retired. Eventually he did get his hands on the White Stockings, although by that time he was sick of dealing with the game (which was pretty disreputable at the time) and looked to get out quickly.
Hart’s tenure with the Cubs was dealing with an aging Cap Anson, whose time had passed him by and who assumed that he, and not Hart, would inherit the team. Once he finally forced Anson out, he went looking for a baseball guy who would be loyal to him the way Anson had been loyal to Spalding. The team stunk for a while until he hired Frank Selee away from Boston. Selee then built the great Cub teams of 1906 to 1910, although he got sick and died before he could lead them to the pennant and Frank Chance got all the credit.
IDK, no vote yet, still reading all the reasons you all voted for whom.
the points about the Trib are undeniable and pretty convincing and so are the bits about William Wrigley.
baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it
William Hulbert is still near his beloved team
William Hulbert’s grave is in Graceland Cemetery, just a little north of Wrigley Field. His monument includes the names of the National League teams from the year he died (1882): Chicago, Cleveland, Buffalo, Detroit, Boston, Providence, Worcester, and Troy. He must have been prescient in order to remain close to his team since he died more than three decades before Weeghman Park/Wrigley Field was built.
Kind of a...
…contest for the tallest midget.
To date, I don’t see how anyone can not vote for the Trib, especially when you compare them to the rest of the lot.
As for Ricketts, it’s way too early to judge.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
William Wrigley (the original) was, IMO, the best.
The Cubs won two pennants while he was owner, and he laid the groundwork for two more. Had he lived longer, the Cubs might have stayed a dynasty. His son ruined that.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Worse than him dying though
was Bill Veeck Sr. dying. Veeck was really the guy who built that team. PK Wrigley would have just done whatever Veeck Sr. had asked (within reason and the budget) had he still been in charge. Instead, PK just went looking for another Bill Veeck Sr. and never found one.
And I agree with you on William Wrigley Jr. being the top owner.
by Josh Timmers on Feb 18, 2010 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
Agreed on Veeck Sr.
Veeck Sr. was a sportswriter who got the job, in part, because Wrigley told him after reading his critiques, “So you think you can do this job, OK, do it.”
PK Wrigley hired another sportswriter, Jim Gallagher, to be GM. Needless to say, Gallagher was no Veeck.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I actually have a personal connection to Gallagher.
He’s the great uncle of one of my wife’s closest friends. Apparently, he was a great family guy but, yeah, his accomplishments as GM weren’t exactly spectacular. Then again, as my wife’s friend is quick to point out, he was the GM the last time the Cubs appeared in the World Series.
After further review...
…you may very well be right.
I was thinking more in the last 40-50 years though. Some of these old timers, you just don’t know how they would have responded when the expenditures started to get much bigger.
You can’t argue with winning pennants though, especially with the Cubs.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
William Wrigley loved the Cubs and wanted to win.
I suspect he would have been the same type of owner in 2010 that the Ricketts want to be.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
That's more praise than the man who fired Joe McCarthy deserves...
Of course Wrigley One was a promotional genius who usually gave customers their money’s worth – in gum, baseball, hotels or resorts. But he’s also the guy who established the cronies-only front office hiring policy that hobbled the Cubs into the 1980’s and probably beyond.
While it’s clear he loved baseball, it’s undeniable that his principal reason for entering the game as an owner was to publicize the Wrigley brand, not only with the Cubs, but with teams in Los Angeles and Reading, PA. Always seeking the Main Chance, he was more than willing to buy stars from less-fortunate owners, then bask in the free and favorable publicity generated by these moves.
But this business model didn’t do much for the Cubs until McCarthy came along, and it quickly became obsolete once Branch Rickey built his first farm system. We can speculate that had he lived another 10 or 15 years, he would have adapted, and saved us the misery of the decades that followed 1938.
However, I think it’s far more likely that, as an enormously successful man in his 60’s and 70’s, he would have held fast to his established policies, either until the bottom fell out of Wrigley Field attendance, or when his social and business peers started to kid him about his failure to produce a winner. At that point, I think he would have sold the Cubs.
"C'mon Freeman, throw the ball somewhere!" Brickhouse, incensed, 5/15/58
"Welcome to Wrigley Field, Mr. Bah-oo-tah!" Brickhouse, rubbing it in, 7/6/60
Are you sure it was William Wrigley...
… who started that cronies-only policy? That’s something I always felt was P.K.’s doing.
As a smart businessman, when Branch Rickey started his farm systems, William Wrigley likely would have copied the idea, as you mentioned. And if he had sold the team, who knows? Maybe some other enlightened owner would have spared us the four decades of terrible.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Veeck Sr.'s career may be a good example of Wrigley One's cronyism...
…or his extreme loyalty to employees, depending on how you want to interpret Wrigley’s exceptional patience in light of the Cubs poor performance in the 1920’s. After all, Wrigley had brought Veeck in as a Cubs executive in the pennant year of 1918 as he was buying-out Weeghman. By the following season, Veeck was team president and the executive face of the franchise.
Veeck’s hiring was a typically brilliant business move by Wrigley, as it assured the team kid-glove coverage by Chicago’s sporting media, even beyond that guaranteed by the Wrigley Company’s enormous print advertising budget. But under Veeck, and presumably Wrigley, sustained mediocrity became the norm, leading up to the team’s first-ever last place finish in 1925. It wasn’t until McCarthy came on board in 1926 that things started to turn around, leading up to the great 1929 season and the near-miss of 1930.
Unfortunately, William Wrigley’s last big baseball move was to sacrifice McCarthy’s genius for the quick publicity that came with naming future Cubs crony Rogers Hornsby as manager for 1931. As we know, Hornsby’s career as a great manager was limited only to those seasons in which he could hit between .380 and .420 as an everyday player.
"C'mon Freeman, throw the ball somewhere!" Brickhouse, incensed, 5/15/58
"Welcome to Wrigley Field, Mr. Bah-oo-tah!" Brickhouse, rubbing it in, 7/6/60
You're right about the McCarthy/Hornsby thing.
I never understood that, much as I’ve read about it. I’m not sure that would have meant a pattern was starting, though. Hornsby surely wasn’t a “crony” when he was hired.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Veeck had a learning curve
and yes, he took five or six years to learn the job. But you can’t praise McCarthy for the team’s turnaround without acknowledging that it was Veeck who found McCarthy toiling away for Louisville in the minors. Or more exactly, it was Veeck’s former colleagues at a Louisville newspaper that alerted Veeck to him. It was Veeck’s genius to listen to them.
McCarthy was fired in a Steinbrennerian rant as much as anything, as McCarthy was blamed for the loss in the 1929 Series. When the Cubs failed to win the pennant in 1930 (about to finish a close second to St. Louis), McCarthy became the goat for Wrigley again.
Clearly, McCarthy’s firing was a mistake. But it’s hard to find a Cubs owner who didn’t make at least half a dozen mistakes like that.
by Josh Timmers on Feb 23, 2010 4:48 PM CST up reply actions
I wish you had used a word other than "goat".
But you’re right about the scenario.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I noticed that
when I wrote it and thought “Heck, I’ll leave it.”
by Josh Timmers on Feb 23, 2010 6:50 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for sharing this with us. Rec'd
It was a good review for me. I love the history, but so bad at remembering it. Looking forward to reading your article.
"Fasten those seatbelts"-Pat Hughes
It's amazingly cheap to ship considering how much it weighs.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by 
























