Yahoo 2010 Cubs Preview
Nothing really new here, just a good summary of the offseason.
about 2 years ago
Al Yellon
23 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Low expectations
from everyone in the media, fine with me. I think this team will do just fine, health being the key. Extracting a certain individual from the clubhouse I think will help.
by Grockcubs on Feb 4, 2010 3:07 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
A year ago, the media was putting the Cubs at the top of the division. I don’t see how they think the Cubs are going to do so bad when they thought they were so good a year ago. Health was the issue last season. If healthy, the Cubs can contend with the best.
I'm optimistic about this year (as I guess I am every year)...
…but I more or less expect this year and next year to be transition years. This year, because of the new ownership and things like that, and next year because of all the minor leaguers who should be major-league ready, along with a couple of our players hitting free-agency.
Some men learn through what they read. Some men learn through what they're told. Some men have to piss on the railroad tracks. And some men keep on pissin'.
Most of what Henson writes here...
…is hard to argue with. (Then again, doesn’t every team’s hope hinge on health?) But two things in particular annoy me:
1. He writes, “Nady is recovering from a shoulder injury and might not be ready for defensive duty by the start of the season.” Um, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Nady have an ELBOW injury (i.e., Tommy John surgery)?
2. He chooses to end his article with the same, lame, stupid, boring goat/bartman reference that we see every year. And, no, I’m not going to give him a break because it’s in Haiku form.
This is what we should do to all national writers who bring up the goat/Bartman stuff:

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
While the topic of the haiku was old and moldy - it's inclusion was humorous.
I like this quote:
bq. “That first World Series title since 1908? Dream on.”
Ok – I will dream on, it’s what opening day should be about
"There are no curses here...Games are won and lost on the baseball field" - Lou Piniella
by El Borto on Feb 4, 2010 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
♪Dream on, dream on, dream until your dream comes true...♫
Some men learn through what they read. Some men learn through what they're told. Some men have to piss on the railroad tracks. And some men keep on pissin'.
It'd be nice....
….if it was more in the 0-173 range
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
bleh
Preview articles like this are just so boring and insight-deprived. Frankly, I think the central will come down to whose rotation is healthiest.
Agreed on both fronts
I really believe it’s time for Carlos Zambrano to step up, earn his money, and pitch like an ace for the whole year. With Lilly missing some time, and the loss of Harden without a replacement, he needs to be the man.
Scott Bora$ is satan.
by Canadian Cubs Fan on Feb 4, 2010 5:26 PM CST up reply actions
While I stay optimist
I think a comment like this merits a little attention.
On the field, everything must fall in place for manager Lou Piniella’s team to make the playoffs.
I believe a lot has to go “right” for the Cubs to make it to the playoffs. Rebound years, better health, and most importantly a starter has to step-up as their true ace. I don’t really care who it is, cause I have serious doubts about BigZ being that guy. With that said, anything can happen, and in sports it usually does.
"The country is full of good coaches. What it takes to win is a bunch of interested players." -Don Coryell, ex-San Diego Chargers Coach
Again, I'd say that's true for most teams...
…though I suppose the Yankees or maybe the Phillies could fall ass-backward into the postseason.
In recent years,
high expectations for the Cubs, at least from the media, have not helped the team. The Cubs, in my opinion, are the ultimate underdogs, and will be until they win the World Series. Let the mainstream media doubt the Cubs; only the attitudes of the players matter.
Remember 2003, when we had a 3 games to 1 advantage over the Marlins in the NLCS? People who barely followed the Cubs started to jump on their bandwagon, and it was almost expected that we’d make the Series. The Marlins assumed the underdog role and this, in part, helped them defeat us. Believe me, psychology in sports, as in all aspects of life, is very important.
"I am not a poet, but a poem."--Jacques Lacan
Wow that was a near perfect assessment of the 2010 Cubs
and one which will reign true, Im afraid
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
The CUBS have as good of a chance as anyone in the division
If most of the team stays healthy, it’s hard to say that they can’t compete for the division.
The Cardinals’ aren’t “amazing” on paper. They’re better than the CUBS, but who knows if that translates into dominance again.
Does anyone think that after Carp and Wainwright, the Cardinals really have much of anything to fear in that rotation? Relief pitchers are the most inconsistent variable in the game of baseball. Who is to say Franklin is as good this year?
Come on Lisa, I'm trying to impress people here. You don't win friends with salad. ~ Homer J. Simpson
Especially considering...
… that Franklin was imploding often in the last month of 2009.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Here's my question ...
A year ago, the pundits were predicting that the Cubs would win the division in a walk. Now, third place is the common prediction for the Cubs.
Here’s what I don’t understand about that argument: There haven’t been THAT many changes to the team in the past year — and some of the changes have been positive. I’ll try to do a move-by-move look at who we’ve lost and who we’ve gained.
Byrd replaces Bradley
Call me crazy, but I don’t think we lose THAT much here. Byrd’s not a great player, but outside of 2008, Bradley wasn’t really great either. Putting aside his emotional issues, Bradley’s tendency to get hurt makes me think Byrd is nearly as valuable. AND Byrd can play center, moving Kosuke to right and making us better defensively.
Gorzo/Shark/Marshall/Silva replace Harden
This is probably a downgrade, but given Harden’s injuries and his inability to go deep into games, I don’t think it’s devastating. I say this fully acknowledging that Harden has nasty, nasty stuff.
Xavier Nady replaces Reed Johnson
Nady’s injury history makes this one hard to gauge, but I still think the X man is an upgrade over Johnson — especially because Johnson’s ability to play center isn’t something the Cubs need in 2010, though a backup first baseman is.
Fontenot/Baker over Fontenot/Miles
Even if Fontenot continues to suck, this is an improvement over last year.
The only thing left, really, is the bullpen, which is still a work in progress. We lost Heilman and Gregg, but big deal. Gregg was good for two months and terrible the rest of the time. Heilman was never that good. I don’t think it will be hard to replace them.
That means that the pundits are lowering expectations of guys the Cubs have had on the roster for years. They must think that Aramis will get hurt again (likely, but not for as long as last year), Soto will continue to suck (possible, though his conditioning program makes me optimistic) and Soriano will continue to decline (frankly, this one is anybody’s guess).
Maybe the pundits were wrong last year, and expected too much of the Cubs. But if they were right, and last year was just an anomaly, then I’m optimistic about 2010.
by elgato on Feb 5, 2010 11:10 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
I like the way you think, elgato...rec'd
baseball.........is Kool Aid the remedy, or the cause of my desire for it
by cooliogirl47 on Feb 5, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
thanks to both of you
BTW, if someone were to argue that the Cubs are standing still while St. Louis and Cincinnati improve, I could respect the argument. But that’s not what I’m hearing or reading. Also, I don’t think I’ve read where anyone thinks the Cubs nucleus is too old — which is another reasonable argument.





















