"Wrigley Club"
This seems like a mis-read of the demand that's out there. The Cubs easily could command something approaching $300 per ticket for the best ~71 tickets behind the plate (the ones not already priced there), without the club and lost suite revenue. Instead, to avoid the PR hit (I guess?) they've added a ticket category of mediocre seats at sky high prices rather than raise existing seats to market price.
The Cubs seem to have derived this idea from the Yankees and Mets, who both added similar expensive, all you can eat clubs at the suite level way down the lines in their new stadiums.
They both sat largely empty for most of the year.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
People will pay it
I’m content with Len and Bob and my couch
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
Hope you're right
I’m all for jacking up prices so the Cubs can command all the $$’s being sucked up by secondary sellers.
Just seems a waste to charge market price for these random 71 seats and not thousands of others.
I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the Cubs aren’t top-tier players in the free agent market anymore.
Had you looked at the FanShot list...
… you would have found this FanShot, posted yesterday, on this very topic.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I did look at the fan shot list
And missed it
Sorry

by 




















