Bank files foreclosure on Lakeview Baseball Club
This should make the folks who don't like the AC sign happy.
about 2 years ago
cubswynn
47 comments
0 recs |
Comments
If everyone on BCB donates $10....
It’s totally doable!
"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck
I'm glad I did a search before I posted anything
Honestly if the cubs were smart they would a) buy it. b) lower prices on that rooftop c) slowly drive other rooftops out of business d)slowly buy up other rooftops. then they would have the all the space for offices they could need; they would get all the rooftop profits; and they could outfit one or more of the bulildings with a video replay board.
---AC 00 00 00 - Believe
by mjk83 on Apr 15, 2010 2:55 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
get Tom Ricketts on the line
"They say you don’t win a pennant in April, but you can sure lose one." - Ryan Dempster
What you just described would be an antitrust violation (predatory pricing).
So, no, I would think they should not do that.
by Orval Overall on Apr 15, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Is the predatory pricing only if they do the parts about the driving the rooftop prices down?
Are most other things fair game? Would zoning issues arise?
thanks for input, and agree this would make a good fanpost.
Come visit me inside Wrigley along the Addison side mezzanine fence straight up from 1st base.
by section229beer on Apr 15, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Most other things are fair game, yes
They can buy it and use it for a commercial purpose. But you can’t deliberately undercharge for the purpose of driving others out of business just so you can consolidate your control after they are gone. I have no idea about the zoning rules, but I would think there is likely to be an issue with a big flashing scoreboard aimed across the street as some have suggested, but you can always ask for a zoning variance (which the city would likely give if it meant fewer changes to Wrigley itself).
by Orval Overall on Apr 16, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
LMAO
Under that scenario there is absolutely no chance of anyone winning an antitrust claim. The bar in predatory pricing claims is extraordinarily high and in a case like this, where real property is involved as well as entertainment services, and where many of the business owners would have a property worth considerably more than they paid for it even without the rooftop business, there is no chance a lawsuit like the one you suggest would succeed.
Since this is a stupid theoretical discussion on a blog, I probably shouldn't indulge you, but...
I’m assuming your either a law student or a 1st to 3d year associate. No one who actually advises a client would say “go ahead and do it, its hard to prove what you’re doing is illegal.” Most companies try not to break the law, not just avoid getting caught breaking the law. But even if not, ultimate proof is rarely as big an issue as the ability to state a credible case and get past summary judgment. Once you’ve done that, a multi-million dollar claim, multipled by 3, plus attorneys fees = large enough settlement to make it a very bad day for most GCs and CFOs.
by Orval Overall on Apr 16, 2010 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions
If you are as experienced as you imply
you should know that it’s silly to make assumptions about people you do not know.
This isn’t a case of advising a company to break the law, it’s about advising them how to get what they want without breaking the law. And given how difficult it is to prosecute an antitrust case generally, and in predatory pricing claims specifically, it would not be remotely difficult.
For example, if the Cubs were to purchase a piece of real property that includes a rooftop with a view inside their stadium, it would be very easy for them to legally package rooftop access to any number of additional products and/or services that they would easily and correctly show is actually in a different market from their neighbors even though the practical reality is that they would be undercutting the existing rooftop market.
This is a bummer for me...
I know a lot of people hate the AC sign, but I’ve always wanted to see the day when it has all 0’s.
Me too
Photoshop to the rescue? I don’t have a good picture of this
"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck
<img src=“”http://s262.photobucket.com/albums/ii83/fonzie2178/?action=view¤t=eamuscatuli.jpg" target="_blank">
"/>
Ahh
It’s so beautiful
"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck
Got one with 7 zeros?
Just win the next game...!
by blackhawk24 on Apr 20, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I like the AC sign too.
Always have. Al on the other hand….
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2008/11/2/651808/lakeview-baseball-club-tea
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
It celebrates failure.
That was the point of that post.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I'll just cut and paste what I said the last time.
It reminds us of our recent success and to people like myself, a hopeful sign of what we can achieve one day. Honestly how many people go to Wrigley and don’t know about the 100 years?
It’s adds to the uniqueness of Wrigleyville and should stay.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
Exactly my point.
Why do we need to remind them about the 100 years?
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
The biggest symbols in, on and around Wrigley
symbolize “the 100+ years”, not just the Anno Catuli sign.
ivy
scoreboard
marquee
bleachers
basket / catwalk
bullpens alone sidelines
true neighborhood location
tire / oil / beer sign on Sheffield bldg
no lights until ’88, still majority day games
With the exception of the ivy and scoreboard, no one item stands out by itself as a symbol of the Cubs and hence 100+ year futility, but packaged together we have whats still quite unique in all of MLB.
Just win the next game...!
by blackhawk24 on Apr 20, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions
The ivy and scoreboard go back 80 years, not 100
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 20, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
It's ridiculous ...
… amateurish, tacky, and should have been thrown out with the concrete slabs.
by bourbon_and_branch on Apr 15, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't get me wrong,
I won’t be any less overjoyed when we win the World Series and there’s no sign to change. The Cubs winning is ALL I want… Maybe I allow that sign to have too much symbolism for me, but I still think it’s kinda cool, something you don’t see anywhere else. I’ll respectfully disagree that it “celebrates” failure, because the club’s goal was always for the sign to read all zeros.
True enough.
It was interesting and fun for a while. I guess after 2003, it started to lose that for me.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yep.
I’ll give you that one Al. I’d rather be punched in the face repeatedly than to have to relive the 2003 NLCS. :-) I understand how that could ruin it for you. Or anyone for that matter.
Yep
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 16, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions
This actually is
newsworthy for a FanPost.
I am wondering if the Cubs would be an immediate player for this asset? Considering the club is looking for more signage facing the seats, it would be a perfect match for a Jumbotron, etc., or whatever they could get through zoning.
Interesting…
Yeah, that is interesting, all right.
The Cubs could buy that and put the Toyota sign on it.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
For some reason I'm okay with it there more than it's proposed place.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
similar to the TORCO sign
I like the idea of the jumbotron there.
Come visit me inside Wrigley along the Addison side mezzanine fence straight up from 1st base.
by section229beer on Apr 15, 2010 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions
wasn't the Torco sign on that building?
Don’t remember.
But buying THAT property and then charging rent wouldn’t be a profit for a while, so why bother when the profit is right there from day 1?
WOXY.com - The Future of Rock and Roll
by Gibbon Jockey on Apr 16, 2010 1:54 AM CDT up reply actions
The Torco sign...
… was where the Miller Lite sign is now.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Given the amount of advertising that would seem to accompany a jumbotron these days...
if a jumbotron goes on a rooftop, I think it would have to be on one of the bigger buildings. A 3-flat building (like the LBC) just isn’t wide enough to hold what we’re used to seeing in other parks.
If it were only the jumbotron screen, i.e. no advertising, then maybe it would fit, but isn’t advertising revenue the primary benefit of such things?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
I would think a "Jumbotron" at Wrigley
would draw a pretty decent ad revenue, regardless if it lives up to others’ distractatrons.
I’m with Shanghai below….
Jumbotron.
Come visit me inside Wrigley along the Addison side mezzanine fence straight up from 1st base.
by section229beer on Apr 16, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Jumbotron
I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Apr 16, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions
If it were only the jumbotron screen, i.e. no advertising
Couldn’t you show “advertising” ON the “screen”?
I would think so
they could use it as an electronic billboard when games are not being played.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." -- Alvin Dark
Do you have any idea how much electricity that would require?
It would be expensive and not exactly environment friendly.
"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster
@Twitter as @brommmietze
And, facing an empty stadium, would be pretty useless.
Advertising to no people doesn’t make much money.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Doesn't exactly promote goodwill with the neighbors, either.
Like an upstairs apartment neighbor who keeps his bedroom tv on 24/7. Grrrrrrrrrrr….
Come visit me inside Wrigley along the Addison side mezzanine fence straight up from 1st base.
by section229beer on Apr 16, 2010 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Far more important to consider
advertising to an empty stadium another 180-ish days a year than a few watts of power.
That is unless it can somehow be rotated to face SW and the corner of Addison/Sheffield.
Just win the next game...!
by blackhawk24 on Apr 20, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions




















