Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

When is a team out of contention?

Obviously we can all understand when a team has been mathematically eliminated. However, we all have different ideas about when we feel a season is over and it's time to look ahead to the following year. Since 2000 the Cubs have had only 1 season where they won 90 games. St. Louis, on the other hand, has had six, including two over 100. While the rest of our division has only one season with 90 wins, you would suspect our win totals should have been higher.

The wild card seems to add a possibility to win fewer games and sneak into the playoffs, but the win total for wild card teams since 2000 include only two with less than 90 wins, one at 89, the other at 88. So essentially we will probably need close to 90 wins to either win the division or enter as a wild card team.

With that in mind, let's assume the Cubs will need a minimum number of 88 wins to make the playoffs. Now the question I propose is this. At what point would you essentially suggest the season was over to make the playoffs? I know it's possible to win 15 in a row, but let's be honest. Is it reasonable to expect any team to go on a streak like that?

There is no right or wrong answer. We all look at a Cub season from an emotional bias. None of us want them to be eliminated. We all hope miracles happen. But how many times have we been surprised by a mid season comeback that propelled us into October baseball?  I'm not talking about miracle teams that surprised us out of the gate but teams that struggled and suddenly caught fire.

How many games under .500 would make you think it was unreasonable to make the playoffs? Not impossible, merely unreasonable.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 74 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There's really no way to answer this.

Being a certain amount of games over .500 doesn’t guarantee you anything. It all depends on the record of the other teams your division and, to a lesser degree, on the records of the teams in the wild-card race.

by mgrace17 on Apr 19, 2010 11:54 PM CDT reply actions  

It depends

If we’re say 10 games under .500 on June 15, but have had a massive number of injuries with players set to come back, we’re in better shape than if we were only 5 games under .500 at full strength. It also depends on how well our opponents are doing. I will say that nobody’s out of contention in April.

Brad Miller is god.

by Poloplaya14 on Apr 20, 2010 12:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Obviously it depends on how many games under .500 and that point in the season

and that point in the season they are at. Basically, to have 88 wins means you need to be 88-74, which is 14 games over .500

If on Aug 1 they were .500, they would need to play 18-11 in Aug and Sept for them to sniff a CHANCE at post season play. Let’s be real, if this particular team is is only .500 on Aug 1, I’d say they’re toast.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Apr 20, 2010 12:23 AM CDT reply actions  

As an aside

So far, this team, even without the Bradley circus, looks the same as last year. I think most folks agreed that the Cubs needed to get out of the gate in good shape, and thus far, we are making poor teams look good. We have a knack of not being able to hit pitchers that we haven’t seen before and our bases loaded run production is in the mud still.

I hope that our window didn’t close with this team 2 years ago and Cubs management is hoping to catch fire in a bottle again. All I see is the more of the same.

I like Colvin and Wells and they are good players to build around, but this may be the last hurrah for this squad. The Bradley/DeRosa/Wood debacle cost this team dearly. Z is still Z, thankfully Demp is still Demp. The bull pen is a mess and Lou still doesn’t use them properly.

I continue to cheer them on, but like last year, I am not emotionally invested in this team like in 2007 and 2008. My outlook is simply “meh” for the 2010 Cubs. I thought that they would be better than the pundits said coming out of ST, but I don’t see it. I don’t see the Cards as a juggernaut, but they are more sound than the Cubs by a long shot.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Apr 20, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow

My comments in a post made after this (but in a different thread) are similar to yours, so I apologize. I hadn’t seen your comments when I posted my thoughts (window closing two years ago, catching lightning in a bottle, etc.). I wasn’t in any way trying to steal what you wrote.

"See the stars they're shining bright, everything's alright tonight."

by markleonette on Apr 20, 2010 3:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

No worries

Superior minds tend to think alike, I always say! ;)

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Apr 20, 2010 4:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have to agree with you

As we saw the past winter, Hendry was effectively limited in his options because of all the bad back loaded contracts. I would have thought our starters might compensate for the lack of offense. But his inability to get a quality setup man looks to be the kiss of death. When you settle for a guy with a lifetime 1.45 WHIP, you asking for for problems. And Lou’s already showing his poor judgment in pitching decisions. I’m fearful he may go overboard with high pitch counts after already placing 2 guys over the 120 pitch count this past week.

I’m hard pressed to see much improvement over last year. Theriot seems a shell of his former self and Zambrano hasn’t had a good start yet. Soto is improved but this offense is worse than last year’s. Anything is possible but I sense another long frustrating year.

I looked at our playoff years and the furthest we fell behind was 1998 when we finished 2nd to the Astros who won 102 that year. However we did win 90. All other years we were a playoff team since 1984, we won the division.

If I was to bet, I’d think the new owners will clear the decks of many veterans by the trade deadline. The minor league talent seems deeper than ever and by 2012 we won’t be seeing a lot of familiar faces. I’d be surprised to see Zambrano here next year. I’d much rather see young talent out there if we aren’t in the hunt. As we’ve seen, Lou isn’t going to replace a veteran with a rookie so I think this is his swan song.

by tharr on Apr 20, 2010 6:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Until this team gets out from under the contracts of

Soriano, Fukudome and Z they’re kind of hamstrung. Especially having guys at the corner outfield positions producing as they do for the amount they make. It seems like there’s light at the end of the minor league tunnel, but Soriano’s contract alone is equal to 1/7th of the Cubs’ entire annual payroll. And they have the third highest payroll in baseball. I can’t even imagine how bad he’ll be in a year or two, let alone in four years. The Cubs’ best hope is that the division comes back to them. This team’s not winning anything close to 95 games.

by the nth on Apr 20, 2010 2:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Gee, I dunno...

Maybe when the number of games left to play is less than the number of games out of a playoff spot? I know I’m going out on a limb with my reasoning there, but I think it’s pretty solid.

What is a horse shoe? What does a horse shoe do? Are there any horse socks? Is anybody listening to me?

by lswaidz on Apr 20, 2010 4:12 AM CDT reply actions  

A lot of good points

Bad contracts, Lou’s inability to manage a bullpen, a bullpen that is way young, the continuance of hitters not to hit with runners on, poor defense, and baserunning that would embarrass a High School coach.
 I thought this team would compete for a playoff spot. However ( yes its early) early returns: This team is not that good. This falls on Hendry and Lou.

by Grockcubs on Apr 20, 2010 7:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Rec'd

4/9/10: Carlos Silva strikes out Joey Votto on three pitches. Is that what you mean by "small sample size"?

by DGU on Apr 20, 2010 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

that's a good point ...

but one difference: The Cubs in April 2007 looked very different than the Cubs in July 2007. Barrett gone, Izturis benched, Soriano in left, Jones in center, Theriot at short.

I don’t see how the Cubs can change things up to that degree this year.

by elgato on Apr 20, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why not?

We already know SS is changing, and there are seeds of change with all the OFs on roster.

It’s a lot easier to fix a bullpen than all your up-the-middle talent.

One encouraging sign – Fontenot, Soto, and Soriano all look better at the plate than last year, while Baker continues to look good.

4/9/10: Carlos Silva strikes out Joey Votto on three pitches. Is that what you mean by "small sample size"?

by DGU on Apr 20, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Correct.

If you could just get Ramirez going, that would solve a lot of the offensive issues.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 20, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree...

…and as I have stated before, you may see Lou manage in a similar fashion that he did in 07.

Remember, the 08 and 09 teams were pretty established and there wasn’t much change you were going to do throughout the year. 2010, is a different story, because there are more options/depth that can be manipulated with the day to day lineup.

By late May early June, you will probably see some changes, depending on how things move along here in the next several weeks:

Colvin may get more playing time
Nady may as well
Soriano could be used less often
Castro could get the call
They may trade for a 2nd baseman

Lot’s of stuff could happen, and I think Lou will pull out all the stops this year to get the best guys on the field despite what their paycheck says.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Apr 20, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's what I like to hear.

I needed some optimism.

"Chicago Cubs baseball is on the air."-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Apr 20, 2010 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1 !!

Rec’d….Panic I see is still contagious around here.

Just win the next game...!

by blackhawk24 on Apr 20, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's never too early to declare it over

There were sages on this site that said it’s over as long as Hendry is the GM. It’s over this year and years into the future. It’s over for this decade for sure and most likely it’s over for the rest of the century.

I don’t even know why we are talking about this.

by jerry morales rules on Apr 20, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 20, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

That team only won 85 games.

The furthest they were under .500 was 9 on June 2. The furthest behind was 8.5 games on June 23. The Division was 54 games under .500 and was by far the worst in baseball. I’d be willing to bet 85 games won’t win a playoff spot this year. And, to be honest, I haven’t given up on the season.

The question posed was: At what point in a season would it be unreasonable to expect a playoff spot? I’d guess anytime after June when they were 10 behind and/or 10 under.

by tharr on Apr 20, 2010 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Generally, I'd agree with you there.

Thus, it’s way too early to give up.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 21, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously

HOWEVER….and this is critical……
The team needs to address the problems with a sense of urgency. If we wait until the trading deadline or assume the team is just going through a slump, we are probably dooming ourselves to a poor finish. The playoffs cannot be won this early in the season. However, it can damn well be lost.

by tharr on Apr 21, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I agree with you that wins in April are just as important as wins in September....

… it is still too early to panic.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 21, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

But it's not too early

to make changes.

If a quality pitching start is 3 runs and 6 innings, then a quality hitting day is 1 for 4.

by tharr on Apr 21, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously, as we found out today!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 21, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

The W-L record is part of it

but you’ll also want to look at how many runs are scored by and against the team. Then, also you’ll want to look at what’s been done to change the run production and prevention. For example, I expect this bullpen to struggle a lot in the opening of the season, but we can hope Lou figures out who’s ready and who’s not and the guys themselves settle in a bit.

4/9/10: Carlos Silva strikes out Joey Votto on three pitches. Is that what you mean by "small sample size"?

by DGU on Apr 20, 2010 7:25 AM CDT reply actions  

The Cubs have scored 53 runs and allowed 64.

Throw out Opening Day, and they’re exactly even at 48-48, four runs a game both for and against.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 20, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Glad you refilled your prescription, Al.

I thought you went to the dark side two weeks into the season yesterday. I look to you for the silver lining.

Me however? The season thus far can be summed up with: Starting pitching great, everything else bad. Although the food at the park has improved.

by the nth on Apr 20, 2010 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Shark Experiment

needs to be over. The guy just can’t pitch right at the major league level right now. IMO, Cashner needs to be called up to try to stabilize the bullpen. He has strikeout stuff which is want you want in the late innings. An argument can be made that you don’t want to stunt his growth but the cardinals did this in 2006 with Wainwright and look at him now. If Cashner has the stuff to start, it is not going to go away.

Frustration for me is that this team is performing exactly as the 09 squad did…inability to hit with the bases loaded, inability to string multiple hits together, bullpen that can’t hold a lead, and starting pitching that has been awesome. It is like the 09 season never ended…

"All I want is food and creative love" - Rusted Root

by TheRiot Police on Apr 20, 2010 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

you already answered your own question

when the team is mathematically eliminated.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Apr 20, 2010 7:40 AM CDT reply actions  

That's when you and I might give up,

but I think what tharr is asking is when do we all feel it’s over-our opinion about when we personally consider the season is done or at what point do we give up.

I just answered for myself (sort of). I do try to wait til they’re mathematically out of it. Sometimes that is hard though.

"Chicago Cubs baseball is on the air."-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Apr 20, 2010 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, I know.

Was just giving my stance too. I understand if people want to give up at an earlier stage. Everyone gets to make their own choices.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Apr 20, 2010 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

So the question becomes:

WHAT’S OUR MAGIC NUMBER?!

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Apr 20, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

http://www.cubsmagicnumber.com/

However, it doesn’t have yesterday’s game up yet, so subtract one from that.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Apr 20, 2010 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

late July

THE FONZ HAS ARRIVED!

by amaru on Apr 20, 2010 8:07 AM CDT reply actions  

10 games out of the wild card on July 30

Back up the truck and trade all these hairy bastards

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Apr 20, 2010 8:55 AM CDT reply actions  

A trade, like the tango, takes two.

You can’t trade people if no one will take them. And with these absurd contracts, who, exactly, is going to be shopping at Cubs Market?

by the nth on Apr 20, 2010 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would give it till Aug 15

but depends on who can trade and for what.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim

by Doggie Stalker on Apr 20, 2010 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Out of contention" is basically the same thing as "impossible odds"

And right now the Cubs still have around a 12% chance of winning the division.

So “not yet” would be the answer to that.

by Wreckard on Apr 20, 2010 9:50 AM CDT reply actions  

14% chance of making the playoffs.

That’s included in “contention”, correct?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 20, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely.

The difference there being whether or not the slim odds of winning the wild card are included.

by Wreckard on Apr 20, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the better question is -

1) what does this team have to show for JH to spend trade chips on bullpen help sooner rather than later
and
2) where’s the line that puts the Cubs into sell mode?

4/9/10: Carlos Silva strikes out Joey Votto on three pitches. Is that what you mean by "small sample size"?

by DGU on Apr 20, 2010 10:05 AM CDT reply actions  

IMO...

…Ricketts is thinking long term, and I’d bet he wouldn’t want to give up any prospects for bullpen help.

Behind closed doors, Rickett’s attitude is likely this; Jim, you have the highest payroll in the NL, and you should be able to field what you need with what you have. If they acquire anyone, I’m thinking they have to trade players to free up payroll.

At the deadline, he may be willing to up the payroll (if they are close) somewhat, but it won’t be a lot.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Apr 20, 2010 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rickett’s attitude is likely this; Jim, you have the highest payroll in the NL

I hope his attitude isn’t that, because it would mean he can’t count. The Mets have a higher payroll. However, I agree with the rest of what you say. :D

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Apr 20, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know what I mean.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Apr 20, 2010 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought so...

…and I believe the Cubs are number 3 in all of baseball behind the yanks and sox.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Apr 20, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought

they were #3 behind the Yanks and the Mets?

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Apr 20, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

You gotta love...

…a post like this after 13 of 162 games.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Apr 20, 2010 10:20 AM CDT reply actions  

When they are called the Astros, Royals, Nationals, or Pirates

and perhaps the Indians, Orioles, and Padres.

For the record, I would have started Blanco at SS and Theriot at 2B for 2010, and released either Baker or Fontenot.

by DisCUBbobulated on Apr 20, 2010 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

My throw at the Dart Board

I think the Cubs are out of contention when they need to win more than 65% of their remaining games to get to 88 wins. 88 wins is a 54% winning percentage. So when the Cubs need to win more than 10% above that season winning percentage, I think they are out of contention.

Just taking a shot and thinking about it in terms of standard deviations. At this point, not fun to think about.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Apr 20, 2010 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

Well thought out.

And I agree. Beyond officially being eliminated (it ain’t over until we decide it is), this makes the most sense. When it is hard to fathom a team sustaining an extended period of exceptional play (10% above sounds fine), then you’re probably done.

by fsuapollo on Apr 20, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

At some point the teams play will settle

That settling point might be at 54% (88 wins) for the season, or it might be at 50%. And if the team does start to settle around the 50% mark, you can’t expect it to just jump up and wins those extra games to get to 88 wins.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Apr 20, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Too early to tell.

This team isn’t where they want to be, but they are by no means out of it when they are 4 back with 149 games to go.

A-well-a Byrd, Byrd, Byrd, well the Byrd is the word.

by mikegncb34 on Apr 20, 2010 10:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Reasonable But Not Certain

This year 3 of the 4 NL postseason teams currently lead their division. I don’t pay as much attention to the AL, but possibly 2 of the 4 AL postseason teams currently lead their division. Most of the time it doesn’t strike me as being this obvious in April.

After 54 games, 1/3rd of the season, a Cub fan should be able to reasonabley hold-on to contention hopes or adjust the expectations downward. Look at the record, how they’ve played over the prior 12-14 games, and what is going on with the team such as injury status of key players and any team controversies. If the division has at least one dominant team, then the standings would tell alot too at the 1/3rd mark.

by AboutTheCubs on Apr 20, 2010 11:13 AM CDT reply actions  

When Ted Lilly leaves the building.

Follow me on Twitter here and catch my twice-weekly Cubs news updates here.

by daver on Apr 20, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

LOL

But this is by far the earliest I’ve seen or heard this quote in a season in the many years I’ve followed the Cubs.

"Chicago Cubs baseball is on the air."-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Apr 20, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is that because...

we have people heading to the ledge faster than ever before??

by fsuapollo on Apr 20, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

4 Back with 149 to Go

(Sarcasm) It’s not mathematically possible for the Cubs to win the central given that math. It is time to jump!

"The big possums walk late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Apr 20, 2010 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

When

the magic number hits zero

Go Cubs!

by wild bill on Apr 20, 2010 2:51 PM CDT reply actions  

It should be noted by those

that didn’t read the Fan post, no where in it was a white flag presented. Nor were any ledges jumped from. It was merely an attempt to examine the diversity of opinion on when the fat lady begins singing. For those that want to paint criticism by anyone other than Al as traitorous, so be it. For those who want to paint every loss as a reason to fire everyone and bring up the AA team, that’s your right.

However, for those willing to have reasoned dialogue, thank you. We all have more in common than that which separates us.

by tharr on Apr 20, 2010 6:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I think some missed your post entirely

it’s a fair question—when is when?

I was suprised to see the % chance that Wreckard posted. Only a 14% chance to make the post-season as of today—that is scary. Let’s Go Cubs! Kick it gear!

by socalbob on Apr 20, 2010 6:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Right, but since it is so early...

… those percentages can change a lot with just a couple of wins.

Now, to get those wins!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Apr 21, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

yep

It was just shocking. I thought it would be in the upper 20’s with a bad start.

You ever watched the Gameday on ESPN? After 2 1/2 innings last night as we were down 2-0, the Mets had a 78% chance of winning that game. Since the data goes back to 2000, that is 10 years worth of games where the Home team wins 78% of the games they lead 2-0 after the visitor bats in the 3rd. That was a suprise.

We are fighting a lot of uphill battles lately.

by socalbob on Apr 21, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  972 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima