Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Cubs And Pirates Postponed... But Baseball Needs Replay NOW

NOTE: This post was originally written on Wednesday night... moved to the top of the page since last night's blown call in Detroit is a topic worth discussing this morning.
Via Twittermyer, the Cubs/Pirates game was postponed at about 10:15 Eastern time:
Game called for unplayable conditions. No makeup date announced.
Gordo tweeted a bit later that there now IS a makeup date:
Game rescheduled for monday. Time tba. But day game expected.

So the Cubs will head to Houston for their off day tomorrow before taking on the Astros on Friday (and then go back to Pittsburgh on Monday -- the game is now tentatively scheduled for 11:35 am CDT). But that's not the big story in baseball tonight -- the big story, as most of you know, is the blown call in Detroit with two out in the ninth that cost Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game.

It's not the "worst call in baseball history", as many tweeted; Don Denkinger's blown call in the 1985 World Series has to be worse, if only for its impact -- it may have cost the Cardinals a World Championship (not that such a thing makes me that unhappy, but really, if they earn it, they earn it).

But a perfect game? Only done 20 times in MLB history? When is Armando Galarraga going to have a chance at that again? Some have called for Bud Selig to overrule this call and "award" Galarraga the perfecto, but that's not really helpful. How silly that would be -- giving a perfect game at a news conference.

The stupidity of MLB not using replay for things like this was underscored by the use of replay in tonight's Stanley Cup Final game -- only minutes after the farce in Detroit. Not that I wanted the goal to count against the Blackhawks, but the point is -- they got the call right. How hard is that concept for Bud Selig and his minions to understand? Instead of a weepy Jim Joyce saying he feels bad, JUST GET THE CALL RIGHT!

After the jump, I'll lay out a simple plan by which MLB could institute replay RIGHT NOW, and then refine it and have a better system in 2011.

Star-divide

In midseason, it's probably too difficult to put people in place in all 30 major league stadiums for all remaining games. So for this year, use the NHL system -- sit someone in the league offices in New York who would do all replays. There wouldn't be that many -- things like this maybe happen a few times a week, occasionally a little more often -- so MLB staff people in NYC could handle it, and communicate with umpires by phone or internet.

As I have written several times, give each manager two challenges per game. Most games, you'd never use any. Two should be enough, and would involve some element of strategy -- if you have a close call in the first inning, do you use one of your challenges up, or save it? Maybe make any close calls in the 8th inning or later mandatory review.

Reviewable calls would include: home runs (as now), fair/foul, caught/trapped, tag plays, and out/safe calls at the bases like the one Jim Joyce blew tonight. Ball/strike calls would specifically be excluded, as would any other call involving "umpire's judgment".

This would have the added benefit of eliminating manager ejections -- since they wouldn't be out there yelling and screaming, they could legitimately ask for the play to be reviewed. Players could avoid some ejections, too.

To improve the system by 2011, replay equipment would be installed at every ballpark, and a fifth umpire would be added to each crew. That umpire would rotate with the other four, and serve both as replay official AND official scorer -- thus taking away that position from sportswriters, who should never have had it in the first place.

I've been calling for such a system since the multitude of blown calls in last year's postseason. To have a call like this ruin a perhaps once-in-a-career opportunity for a pitcher, and take away what would have been the first perfect game in Detroit Tigers history, is just inexcusable.

Do it, Bud. Do it now. NOW. Tomorrow isn't too soon. Get it done. Get the calls right. It's way past time.

Poll
Should baseball add replay review for all plays except balls and strikes?
Yes
784 votes
No
207 votes

991 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 518 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Simply criminal.

Props to Galarraga for keeping his head. I loved seeing Miggy stand up for him and keep jawing with Joyce the rest of the inning.

Follow me on Twitter: @brandonrifkin

by Schwa on Jun 2, 2010 9:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I liked that too.

But I really felt bad for Joyce. They really let him have it.

Maybe next year is finally our year.

by Unique on Jun 2, 2010 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel bad for both Galarraga and Joyce.

I just saw the replay. Ugh.

I was working tonight and heard something about a perfect game for the Tigers being ‘blown’ by a bad call but then forgot about it.

That mistake will haunt Joyce for the rest of his life- not just his umpiring career (which has been over 20 years now).

And the missed opportunity will stay with Galarraga for the rest of his career too. How many chances do you get to pitch a perfect game in the majors? Ask Milt Pappas.

A situation nobody ever wants to be in. Too bad.

Maybe this will finally be event that brings REAL replay review to MLB. Like “Tommy John Surgery” and “Lou Gehrig’s Disease”, it will be known as “Galarraga Review”…

…well, maybe not.

We have met the enemy and they are us! ~ Walt Kelly, Pogo, 1971

by Zeke on Jun 3, 2010 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Everybody makes mistakes. This one just happened to be at a TERRIBLE time. Talk about being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jun 3, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Shame that a 22 year

and, by all accounts, of a very good respected career will now ONLY be remembered by this.

It was a bad call, but the idea that this guy will be remembered for this makes me sad.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 3, 2010 2:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

why?

Yes the call was blown but I dont think it was atrociously bad…and props to Joyce for calling him safe because he felt that the runner was safe…not for calling him out, even though he felt that he was safe, just because it was a perfect game.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, it was atrociously bad.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

And much like the Bartman occurrence, if the play happens in the first inning,

no one thinks anything of it (at the time). 2 outs in the ninth, well that’s different…

We have met the enemy and they are us! ~ Walt Kelly, Pogo, 1971

by Zeke on Jun 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree

I just rewatched the replay and it is pretty close (granted from a distance) I just feel SO bad for him though and all of the players.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was atrociously bad.

Given that even watching it live, and NOT in slo-mo replay, he appeared out, AND the stakes of the play (out, and it’s a perfect game), the umpire has to call out. Even the runner thought he was going to be called out.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did you see the runner's reaction?

He couldn’t believe it. Looked genuinely upset that he had been called safe.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Never saw that before.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think he

wanted to be part of history. Either way they go with this, he will be now!!

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

He clapped because he got a hit

And then I think he realized what the price of that hit was and he just put his hands on his head and had really wide eyes.

"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jun 3, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wait, what?

He has to call him out? That’s ridiculous.

by VFTB Matt on Jun 3, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ridiculous?

No. Same reason Bruce Froemming has to give Milt Pappas that call 39 years ago.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Huh? "Has to"?

So now you’re railing on a judgment call?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Froemming made the wrong judgment.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

And you know this how?

Furthermore, how do you defend that position while at the same time you take this postion w.r.t. instant replay:

Ball/strike calls would specifically be excluded, as would any other call involving “umpire’s judgment”.

Are they not in conflict?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

No.

My opinion is that Froemming missed that call. However, I would not support replay to reverse it.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, that makes sense

But when you use a phrase like “has to”, I think that’s a bit stronger than an opinion, especially in the context of this discussion.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see your point.

I still think in the context of that situation — an 8-0 game with two out in the ninth and a perfect game on the line — most veteran umpires would have given Pappas the call.

Froemming was in his second MLB season in 1972.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

See it and Call it

Umpire has to make his call and stick by it unless he gets help from the other umpires. That’s what Joyce did – he made his call and stuck by it until he saw the replay.

There is no way an umpire can think about the game context – “wow, if I call this an out, it’s a perfect game” – and make calls based on that. That’s not umpiring; that’s placating the masses.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying...

the call was correct (which obviously it wasn’t). We’ve got enough “close enough” calls because a situation. The good old turning a DP out is one of my major pet peeves.

Outs (or afe calls) shouldn’t be dictated because of the game situation.

by VFTB Matt on Jun 3, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm with you there...

At least for myself I see the ump call the guy out at first on one quite a bit just because it’s close. Instant replay alone would cause those plays to be called more closely I think…knowing that close isn’t enough for the replay that will happen if they just give it to the fielding team.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

If you are that close to history

you make sure that if you make a mistake, you make it on the side that isn’t taking something away from the kid.

THAT is why there is and should be such outrage on that call. You don’t make that safe call unless you are 100% – no 300% CERTAIN that he is safe. A tie goes to the pitcher in that situation.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

If that call was against the Cubs

I would still say give it to the kid. He deserved it. I am a Cubs fan, but a baseball fan.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely.

I would be just as upset if I were an Indians fan. Heck, even if I were Donald’s dad I would be just as upset.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I listened to ESPN last night going on and on about this.

The guy there wanted Selig to use his “best interest of baseball in this”. Which of course sounds good but as he so skillfully avoided, it will set a precedent and make a loophole for bad calls if done instead of instant replay.

Anyway they had several Cleveland callers and they all thought the call was bullshit and wrong. Pretty cool to hear.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Losing 3-0 in 28 outs and a blown call versus 27 outs doesn't make any difference in the standings

Of course if it was against the Cubs I would support it being an out. I’d like to think I would if it was the difference between winning and losing, but that’s a moral dilemma for a different day.

by madcow256 on Jun 3, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was atrociously bad for the following reasons

For those who said the play was “close”, it really wasn’t in terms of MLB calls. The fact is that even if it was a tie goes to the runner scenario, Joyce certainly would not have been faulted universally for calling him out. But it wasn’t a tie goes to the runner situation, it was barely even a bang-bang.

If you watch Joyce, he raises his hand to make an out call, and then you can tell he starts overthinking what he sees. He starts thinking that he doesn’t want to be known as the umpire who gifted an out call to preserve a perfect game. So he convinces himself that he’s making the professional call which, sadly, is the wrong one. It was also clear on the field by Joyce’s demeanor that he was 100% sure he got the call right. I do think that the ball moving around Galarraga’s glove and the less than clean foot stomp threw Joyce off.

Either way, props to Galarraga for his handling of the situation.

by BeltwayCubsFan on Jun 3, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I completely disagree

the Umps do not have to call anyone anything based on the game…if the runner is out, call him out – if he is safe, call him safe, I dont care if a guy is going for back-to-back perfect games in game 7 of the world series…make the right call.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Close? Close?

The runner was a full stride (about 3 feet) from the base when the ball was in the glove. Not close. A no-brainer call for an ump standing nearby. Furthermore, how does an ump working a 26-out perfect game situation not call him out if there is ANY DOUBT AT ALL? As some have said, the usual drill here is that you’d better be a stride past the base in this situation to hope to be called safe. You don’t need slow-mo to detect out-by-three-feet. Just reasonable vision and an attentive brain.

Most little league umps will never blow such an obvious call. (Unless its their kid!)

by cubmudgeon on Jun 3, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Quick question.

I just got her and I noticed pinella switched the lineup to Nady at first and Baker in right. Not that it makes much of a difference, But doesn’t Nady have more experience there and Baker could play first?

by mdcubsfan on Jun 2, 2010 9:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Nady has more experience at 1B, I think.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was thinking more along the lines of:

1) why not Baker at 3rd instead of A-Ram? and/or
2) why not Colvin instead of Baker in right?

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nady still might have an arm issue.

Don’t think the TJ recovery is 100% yet. 3rd base would not be a good place for him.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Is Baker all right now?

Was on vacation the last few days…haven’t heard. I sure would love an alternative to Rami taking the collar nightly that doesn’t involve Fonty at 3B.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's simply BS

I don’t think it takes a little league ump to call Donald out. Worst call in the histories of perfect games

by braziliancubsfan on Jun 2, 2010 9:52 PM CDT reply actions  

http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2010/06/cubs-nady-said-to-be-on-angels-radar.html

In a fanpost this is being discussed, though with Lee being traded…I guess I might prefer lee traded because Nady is younger, and I guess the cubs could sign him next year at 1B if he does well this year

by mdcubsfan on Jun 2, 2010 9:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Doubt it.

Nady’s probably gone next year.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would agree with you, except if he does well for the rest of the year

AND lee sucks, I would certainly consider resigning him to be a 1B/OF…He wouldn’t cost as much as DLee

by mdcubsfan on Jun 2, 2010 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not proposing it...

… but I think the notion of Soriano playing first is going to get some serious consideration for next year.

I don't care how long you've been around, you'll never see it all.

by Dou on Jun 3, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh.

I hope not. That’ll send a lot of Starlin Castro’s throws into the first base dugout.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

No way should Soriano be put at first.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

New infield defensive alignment

Play Castro behind second base, and the 2B in foul ground behind Sori to retrieve all the throws that Sori misses.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Got that right. He's in the only position now he can play in. We've seen

already how he handles new ones and it isn’t good.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, one would hope that he gets that under control eventually

I’d think a near-full season this year would go a long ways with that

by Danwood on Jun 3, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, I see now.

You’re talking about Castro. Sure, his throws will improve. That doesn’t mean Soriano would catch them.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

So did I.

If he hopped too much, you’d get more calls like last night’s by Jim Joyce.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was thinking he meant because

Soriano would not catch them, not that Castro would be out of control.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's exactly what I meant.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

As always, I blame Bud Selig.

He’s 75, 76 in less than 2 months. The average life expectancy of US male is 75.6. Just sayin’.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 9:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Sorry, not funny

Just got back from a wake for an 80-year old. Her age didn’t make it any less sad.

I'm singing, "GO CUBS GO! GO CUBS GO!" -- DrCrawdad on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM CDT

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -- Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Jun 3, 2010 6:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe that's what Al's announcement is.

He’s going to be the next Commissioner.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I accept!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's why you're so sure the DH is coming!

It all makes sense.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Dang seemed like a good plan until I saw that one.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm....let's review....

You’re bright, motivated, articulate, practical, and a true and knowledgeable lover of the game.

As I’m sure you’ll understand, this means that there’s just no match between you and MLB at the current time. But we’ll keep your resume on file.

Seriously, though – I’d love a Yellon commissionership….you’d be the new Judge Landis!

"Every day when I show up, I try to provide a little laughter...some days when I pitch it gets pretty funny, too." -- Ryan Dempster, 5/2010

by CaughtInTheVines on Jun 3, 2010 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

For one thing, the MLB offices...

… would be moved back to Chicago, where they were when Landis was commissioner.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

On the North Side...

…no doubt!

"Every day when I show up, I try to provide a little laughter...some days when I pitch it gets pretty funny, too." -- Ryan Dempster, 5/2010

by CaughtInTheVines on Jun 3, 2010 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

As I have written several times, give each manager two challenges per game. Most games, you’d never use any.

Just thinking aloud here…

Why wouldn’t I as a manager use all my challenges every game? What’s the harm? If the old adage is something to the effect of “A manager can affect as much as 10% of the game’s outcome”, I’d be darn certain to use both my challenges each and every game—thus upping the ante that my baseball mind can positively affect the game’s outcome.

There has to be some de-incentive so this doesn’t happen, akin to NFL taking timeouts away. I’m hard pressed to think of an idea, however. You cannot take away an out. But perhaps you can take away a mound visit? I dunno.

Dan

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 9:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, I can see the downside.

But two replays wouldn’t delay games unnecessarily. And the disincentive is that if you use them up early — you can’t use them when it might really count

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, there's got to be a very brief time limit, no?

I envision something akin to football, where the entire team is hustling to the center to snap the ball before a play can be challenged. This would also force MLB to implement strick time limits—if an offense is deliberating whether or not to challenge a play, the batter can’t sit outside the box while his coach is thinking.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Before the next pitch is thrown.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know that, but time limits are not enforced very well right now.

They would have to be to create a fair challenge system.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's a fair point.

I would think most managers would be pretty quick to do their challenge. Look how fast many of them run out of dugouts now to argue.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah you're right with that.

Some of those managers move pretty well for 60 year old guys wearing uniforms!

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

but thats also

just to argue – NFL Managers are quick to yell at the umps as well…throwing the challenge flag could have a “negative” impact if you were wrong – if youre wrong after storming out to the ump, so what

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is true.

I’m glad you see some of the drawbacks, it would be difficult to implement this without lengthening the games though it doesn’t have to be a lot with it. I definitely think managers would use it more than you seem to…I doubt there would be many games where it wasn’t used since the manager won’t have time to do a thorough replay review before throwing a flag or coming out of the dugout. I think a flag would be easier…because missing a sign to a pitcher or batter to stop before the manager can get out there would be criminal.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

The teams need to have someone upstairs.

Thats basically how it works in the NFL. I’d say most challenges are made by the coach upstairs seeing a bad call and relaying it to the Head coach.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

What if the onus was put on the umpires?

Leave the decision to view the replay up to them instead of the managers. For example, Jim Joyce calls “time” after the play at first and the crew goes to watch the tape – then they come back and he signals safe/out.

Now this assumes the umpire isn’t such an egomaniac that he thinks he’s infallible. Also, maybe you could institute the “can’t come out to argue” rule that Al proposed.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

To me, this response is exactly why the challenge system is a non starter.

By implementing the NFLs challenge system, you are going against your own point of “just get the call right”. In the NFL it is necessary because of the timing issues, but MLB has no game clock. The technology is in place where you can simply implement the idea of having another ump in the booth who has ultimate veto authority on any call. Whenever they see something called wrong, they call down and overturn it. No reason to leave it in the hands of a manager using challenges, because what if Jim Leyland had already used both challenges tonite? You punish the Tigers because the imps blew multiple calls?

by aphoward13 on Jun 2, 2010 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see your point.

Then let the umps decide, or the guy in the booth — although that would be more difficult if the replay umpire is in New York (as they do in the NHL).

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly. Instead of a challenge system, let the replay ump decide when to review a play.

The manager can ask but in a situation when the call was evidently right, the replay umpire would not review the play. There is no incentive not to review plays because that is that official’s main job during the game. On the other hand, no frivolous challenges would exist and replay would be used only when needed.

I believe the problem with replay is that we tend to look at the NFL system of challenges. Let’s look instead at college football, where replays are called from the official suite by people in charge of that.

If the goal is to get the meaningful calls right, challenges should be out of the equation, especially in a sport like baseball, where the meaningful plays can happen at any time during the game.

by Fraggin Judge on Jun 3, 2010 12:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

With the system they have now for HR replays...

… managers can ask for replay, or umpires can choose to do it. Maybe you could have both for other replays as well.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right

It might frustrate some teams or managers if the umps don’t choose to have their calls reviewed, but I think the majority of umpires would opt for the replay if it means they won’t be vilified for their mistake afterward, or ruin something special like in last night’s case.

by madcow256 on Jun 3, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I can see the tradeoffs with a challenge system, it would be criminal to

have something bad happen without a review possible after 2 other calls reviewed. I think you could adopt it where both umps and managers can ask for it, I don’t trust the officials to review plays if they are the only ones deciding.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

One challenge

And if it is successful, then you get another, continuing until you lose a replay decision.

This would limit gamemanship at least during the early innings.


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 4:19 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm with you, Al

But, I’d take it one step further. With Questec and Foxtrax and all these ways to call balls and strikes, let’s go there, too, and have the computer call the balls and strikes. The ump would just be back there to call foul balls, HBP, and safe/out at the plate.

by raisin1 on Jun 2, 2010 10:02 PM CDT reply actions  

LOL.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree completely

Ever since I was a kid it would frustrate me endlessly to see games determined by people on the field with less ability to get calls right that everyone else watching at home. This goes for every sport. Why can there not be one team sport where the outcome is not dependent on a referee or umpire getting something right? I always dreamed of a single umpire watching the same tv feed as everyone else and announcing the calls over the PA, subject to slow-motion replays for accuracy. I guess golf is the only sport that allows replay review in every situation.

by Jerry Mumphrey on Jun 2, 2010 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

As an umpire...

I disagree with the balls/strikes thing — With what you are proposing, really, why have umpires in the field at all? The umpires are key to game management and facilitation and if you take everything away then what umpire is really going to want to go out there and not be challeneged to perform day in and day out?

These guys are highly trained and get 99.9% of the calls right (and go unnoticed)… then when they blow a call the sky falls (and sometimes rightly so, ay Galarraga?).

I think you’d be surprised at how much the game changes if you start using a computer/camera to call balls/strikes. As a pitcher or hitter it changes the complexion of a game if I know that the umpire is giving an inch or two off the plate and he’s being very consistent about it. Now I need to be swinging instead of taking all those close pitches or be painting the heck out of that corner as a pitcher. ERAs would go up and it would become a lot more hitter-friendly.

by cj100683 on Jun 3, 2010 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

How is this bad?

think you’d be surprised at how much the game changes if you start using a computer/camera to call balls/strikes. As a pitcher or hitter it changes the complexion of a game if I know that the umpire is giving an inch or two off the plate and he’s being very consistent about it. Now I need to be swinging instead of taking all those close pitches or be painting the heck out of that corner as a pitcher. ERAs would go up and it would become a lot more hitter-friendly.

Ok, let’s play the game by the written rules, not by the arbitrary set the guy behind the plate decides on that day.

Key phrase:

changes the complexion of a game if I know that the umpire is giving an inch or two off the plate

Exactly, I don’t want the ump changing the complexion of the game. You say that as if it is a good thing. So ERAs go up and more runs are scored? Again, how is that bad? I would expect in the long run it wouldn’t make as big a difference as pitchers adjust to not having moving target game to game.

Formerly known as BleedsbluinMi.
"You ain't a beauty, but hey you're alright. And that's alright with me" - The Boss

by Dmc202 on Jun 3, 2010 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

You are right

My point is though: it will change the game…until we all get used to it. Just like the humidor did in Colorado as an example.

Overall replay makes it more fair but the umpires would be less engaged than they are now. I mean if my pitcher is up there walking people as a fielder then I get bored. If I don’t have to make any calls as an umpire then I get bored…oh hey, look at the butterfly and that smokin hot babe in the first row ;-)

by cj100683 on Jun 3, 2010 8:30 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sure MLB could find 60 umpires

who would be able to deal with the “boredom.” If that’s the only issue here, I don’t see an issue.

by msquared10 on Jun 3, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Is that the kind of person

You want running a game in front of 40k people plus national TV audiences? It would be an issue, I think. These dudes need to be engaged.

by cj100683 on Jun 3, 2010 9:45 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'd be totally on board with this.

If anyone following an ESPN GameCast can clearly see whether a pitch is actually a ball or strike, immediately and with better accuracy than the umpires…

by msquared10 on Jun 2, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Perfect games

Nobody ever really thinks about the umpires when thinking about perfect games. Along with the pitcher and defense, umps have to be perfect too.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Jun 2, 2010 10:03 PM CDT reply actions  

There's a way to get them closer to perfect.

Use it.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Feel Bad got Galarraga

But also feel bad for all of us BCB’ers recently

"If The Phone Doesn't Ring, It's Me"

by parrotinct on Jun 2, 2010 10:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Great.

That doesn’t help Galarraga now, does it?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't give him a perfect game...

… but I’d draw some tiny sliver of satisfaction from the fact that person who was in charge of making that call acknowledged that it should have been a perfect game after the fact.

I don't care how long you've been around, you'll never see it all.

by Dou on Jun 3, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sure he does

But there’s still room for the MLB to make it right, so let’s not settle for just an apology.

by madcow256 on Jun 3, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

The ump has commented

Joyce was extremely apologetic. Galarraga is being gracious. His quote was something like, “I know I threw a perfect game”. Joyce knows he blew it.
On another note, Buerhle threw a perfect game last year, and there have been two so far this year already. There have only been 20 perfect games in the whole history of pro baseball. What’s going on?

by Nibbles on Jun 2, 2010 10:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Pitching seems to be dominant the last year or two.

Look at what Jimenez has done this year besides the perfect game.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

or look at the Cub's offense

Formerly known as BleedsbluinMi.
"You ain't a beauty, but hey you're alright. And that's alright with me" - The Boss

by Dmc202 on Jun 2, 2010 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lack of steroids?

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

I think that it is more the lack of amphetamines. Players can’t use them anymore to get “up” for a game where they are really tired. Combine a very fatigued, flat team with a pitcher that has really good stuff that night and you have an increased chance for a perfect game or no hitter.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting observation

I’d thought it was the steroids, but this could actually be the reason. Players had been using pep pills for many years – Pete Rose used to in the 70s, I believe. There’s no doubt pitching is ascendant this year. LA has a 31-inning scoreless streak. We’ve had three perfect games and a no hitter. Philadelphia was shut out in 5 of 8 games (last time that happened was the 1992 Cubs).

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm such a fossil I remember that stretch

Cubs had just got Kal Daniels as a cure for the offense, but they still got shut-out/swept in Atlanta.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's Arizona that hasn't scored in 31 innings, not LA.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

Doesn’t LA have a scoreless innings stretch for their pitching staff, though? Longest in 20 years for them? I feel like I just read that.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right, and it's 31 innings.

Which is the same as the D’backs scoreless streak, since the two teams have played each other.

It’s the last seven innings of Monday’s game, the 10-inning game on Tuesday, and the 14-inning game yesterday.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cubs

I think the Cubs of 1968 had a scoreless streak that was around 40 some innings.

"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields

by KedzieKid on Jun 3, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

48 innings.

The last eight innings of a 10-inning 3-2 loss to the Braves on June 15, 1968.

Then they were shut out four straight times, the first in 11 innings by the Braves, so that’s 46 total innings. Three of those shutouts were by 1-0.

They scored in the third inning of a 3-2 win over the Reds on June 21, 1968, leaving the streak at 48 innings. I believe that is the major league record.

In that year, known as “The Year of the Pitcher”, the Cubs played in eleven 1-0 games, going 4-7. Fergie Jenkins, who went 20-15 that year, was the losing pitcher in five of those seven games and threw ten shutout innings in another of them..

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

And for Bud's inevitable excuse about pace of game

Heres a simple way to speed up avg game time, eliminate managers/players arguing calls. They will never overturn anything, so institute automatic ejection/fine/suspension for anyone arguing or leaving the dugout, just like the NBA does for skirmishes. Same for “bench clearing” brawls etc. When 12 guys r suspended, that will be the last time these idiotS rush the field and stand around for 10 min.

by aphoward13 on Jun 2, 2010 10:12 PM CDT reply actions  

That's my whole point.

Managers wouldn’t be allowed to argue. You challenge the play and it gets reviewed. That would take WAY less time.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

On that we agree

Challenges, not so much. Maybe I am biased as a Bears fan that has seen Lovie blow so many challenges and get screwed by it later in games. Getting calls right is the priority, not a guy in the dugout who can’t see the play making a call.

Plus remember, the NFL coaches have people in the booth reviewing before they throw the flag. MLB does not allow such communications.

by aphoward13 on Jun 2, 2010 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

True enough, but...

… most MLB managers would know when to use challenges and when not to.

We can complain about Lou for many things, but I think he’d know when to use those challenges. On that, he’s no Lovie.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's an interesting point. I doubt you could allow the teams to have their own

person in the booth watching the game and communicating…they would definitely tip signs.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

but it is fun

when a manager goes ballistic…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fun, but stupid and pointless.

It costs managers money (they get fined) and possibly days with their team, if they even touch a tiny bit of the bill of their cap to an umpire, they can get suspended.

What’s the point of that?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

well

the manager just needs to not touch the ump…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right, but..

… sometimes it’s inadvertent and the tiniest little touch and under the zero-tolerance policy, managers get suspended. Players, too. Replay would end this nonsense.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sometimes the ump even leans into the contact . . .

Replay would also prevent some of these ump divas from getting attention and power since they seem to desire it.

by madcow256 on Jun 3, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Indeed

Wish I had a clip of Lee Elia going against Eric Gregg in a 1982 Cubs/Dodgers game I attended at Wrigley. Elia’s lips were about a millimeter from Gregg’s.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed 100% Al

The crusty old heads of MLB have remained behind EVERY other league. Baseball needs replay NOW.

Insert Clever Statement Here

by MrNFL on Jun 2, 2010 10:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Wow, just wow

I wasn’t a huge proponent of replay before, but after this I see no other choice. That kid deserves a perfect game. That ump deserves to have the call go the right way even if he made the wrong call. If Bud Selig doesn’t do something about this now, then he never will.

Al I really appreciated the fact that you said giving him a perfect game in a press conference would just be ridiculous. Total BS. Fix this now!

by renke81 on Jun 2, 2010 10:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, I know.

But, they still lead the series!

The Flyers are tough at home. This has been a good series. Look forward to Friday.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

The countdown has begun:

I believe any sort of MLB-approved change (not that there’s gonna be one) has to be done prior to the team’s next game. Unfortunately, the Tigers play tomorrow @ 12:05. Talk about a horrible, horrible time for an early game.

Dan

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Few things

1) Selig needs to give the kid a perfect game. I don’t care if it would be ridiculous. It is less ridiculous than pretending this call was right, which is what happens if nothing is changed.

2) Al’s replay suggestions are excellent. As for the challenges thing, that is fine, but also say that disputed calls in close games (defined as calls that would put or remove the tying or go-ahead run in or from the on deck circle after the 7th inning) are reviewed automatically.

3) Tell managers they may no longer leave the dugout except to change pitchers, check on an injured player, or to specifically ask the ump to review a play or to specifically ask why the other manager has done so.

It would have taken 25 seconds max to overturn that play tonight. Do not bring me time.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 2, 2010 10:20 PM CDT reply actions  

It might have taken two minutes to make that call right.

Which is still shorter than most manager/umpire arguments.

On #2 and #3 I agree with you. I dunno about awarding him his perfect game. It would definitely be un-Seliglike, in any case.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll agree with #1

Have a heart, Bud, and let Galarraga, the Tigers and baseball fans have the perfection when we can get it.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Jun 2, 2010 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gallaraga

is on baseball tonight telling the announcers that Joyce even apologized for the mistake. Let’s quit these ridiculous posts that suggest trying to reinvent the wheel, and just do the damn obvious thing. In this case, it’s award the perfect game.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 2, 2010 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Worf you are a hot headed, blowhard but on this issue

you are 100% right.

Give the kid his perfect game.

Use the NFL model for Replay.

Keep Managers in the damn dugout where they belong rather than having them throw temper tantrums like a 2 year old on the field.

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)

by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jun 2, 2010 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sending Selig an e-mail

suggesting that he add a fan liason to the rules committee. I’m hereby nominating Worf for the job.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 2, 2010 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he gets the job does that mean he can't post anymore?

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)

by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jun 2, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he became lightheaded...

…would that make it a Dizzy Trout?

"Every day when I show up, I try to provide a little laughter...some days when I pitch it gets pretty funny, too." -- Ryan Dempster, 5/2010

by CaughtInTheVines on Jun 3, 2010 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Selig news conf unnecessary

Just issue a news release from Selig that the call is overturned. Gallaraga gets the perfect game. Ump feels better. Fans are happy. The Tigers can call their own news conference if they want.

by 3fingerbrown on Jun 3, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good breakdown of changing/not changing the call

here.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 2, 2010 10:25 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree with everything in that link.

Well stated and written.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't buy the arguments to not give Galarraga the perfect game

Yes it’s not ideal that the players and fans at the game can’t have the “perfect game moment”. I’m sure they would all settle for the next best thing at this point.

And it really doesn’t open a can of worms IF MLB initiates more replay as well.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Jun 2, 2010 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

it does

if the commish overturns games on a whim…what happens if the Cubs lose the last game of the year on a blown call and miss the playoffs – should Bud then overturn that and the Cubs win?

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey!

How about ruling fan interference on a certain NLCS game in 2003 and awarding the Cubs an out? We can go back and replay the last FOUR outs of that game, then, and give the Cubs the 2003 World Series!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

so basically every batter after that one would have been out and then the Cubs would have thrown 4 more perfect games and there we go.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Only if Jim Joyce wasn't on the umpiring crew.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

hey

that would mean Dlee would hit into a DP that way hes playing now ;-)

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

This isn't a whim

And replay would end the second scenario.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Jun 3, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was for awarding the perfect game

but now I am not…simply for:

Why retroactively overturn this call and not others? Bad calls happen all the time. Should Bud Selig be in the business of changing the outcomes of games in which outs were called on trapped balls? Should he demand that a game be started over from the top of the sixth inning when the umpires missed a balk? It’s an overused phrase, but it’s overused for a reason: where do you draw the line?

Basically we can just have Bud sit in his office and give us the box scores for the days games at 10:00 p.m. and we never have to worry about replay again. I am positive that historical moments were either created or missed in history and that is the way it is in a sport run by men…I am all for replay but in this case leave it as is Bud.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:38 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly.

I don’t think you can award the perfect game. But you can prevent this from happening again by having replay review.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's a silly, straw-man argument

This would have been the last out of the game. The call was clearly blown.

None of what you doom-and-gloomers say would happen would actually happen.

It’s just one more way baseball traditionalists like to hold down progress.

Guess what? It used to be tradition that blacks couldn’t play.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

+1

Formerly known as BleedsbluinMi.
"You ain't a beauty, but hey you're alright. And that's alright with me" - The Boss

by Dmc202 on Jun 3, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

+2

That really is the rub. It was the last out of the game, on a call so bad that even the ump issued a mea culpa.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 3, 2010 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am most certaintly not a traditionalist

but what would stop Bud from changing a strike to a ball on the batter that Gallaraga went to 3 balls on and now all of a sudden the perfect game is over with anyway, or how about a play in the first inning right before a team scores 5 runs, nope sorry you got 0…so instead of winning 5-4 you now lost 0-4…you basically take the game out of the players hands and put it into the hands of the commish – imagine if we had a tyrant for a commissioner and he started reversing calls and changing games left and right. Imagine last night if Gallaraga gave up 4 runs after that and now Bud is going back and changing that one call so Gallaraga can have his perfect game and it changes the outcome dramatically. What if then the Tigers miss the playoffs to the Indians by 1 game and the Indians win the World Series?

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're taking this too far

No one is changing the outcome of the game regarding who won or loss. All the scenarios which you paint are not in question. And a tyrant is more apt to let unjustice stand rather than correcting it.

If baseball could change the George Brett pine tar incident, it can change this. I hate to sound like Wilford Brimley, but it’s the right thing to do.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Jun 3, 2010 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

This was the last out of the game

Everything else you just brought up is just traditionalist pap

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

as I said before

I am NOT a traditionalist – I am 100% in favor of smart progress – I just dont want Bud coming back and changing something that happened in the game – slippery slope…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes even if 4 runs were given up and that scenario happened it should be reversed

the game should have been over. The argument you lay out is that some team should be awarded a playoff berth because of a bad call.

Where the right call can and should be made, it should be made. There are no effects after that call because the game is over.

by jerry morales rules on Jun 3, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Heck Yeah

It was the last out of the game. Selig can simply say the game was over at that point. No strategy, no nothing would have been changed. If that happened at any other time in the game, then I’d say he shouldn’t change the call because subsequent plays build off of previous plays. But not in this case. The game was over.

I think Selig can simply say that this is a one time occurance of extrodinary circumstances. It shouldn’t be used as a precedent for in-game calls where subsequent plays were effected.

It is odd to me how people can argue that we shouldn’t make the game more accurate just because there’s always been inaccuracy. Last night’s Blackhawks hockey game was improved because referees were allowed to review 2 potential goals and determine what he correct call was. The game was better off for it. I am for video replay, but I bring that up not to call for video reply in baseball but to say that that improvements can be made

by jerry morales rules on Jun 3, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Home runs are already reviewable

The incorrect call did not cost either team in the standings, which is the purpose of hockey replay. The replay being suggested would be different from hockey because it would be simply to validate stats. Not saying that’s a bad thing, but Hockey and Baseball currently utilize replay in the same manner.

Did the ball go over the wall?

Did the puck cross the line?

by Danwood on Jun 3, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes but

in hockey, the goals are the only “scoring” opportunities, in baseball a man on base makes an opportunity for more that one run. Like football, a bad call can cost you posession which can result in lost opportunities. A bad call can kill a rally in a heartbeat in baseball, and this game relies on rallies alot.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

An opportunity

Does not equal a score. A puck crossing the line isn’t an opportunity to score, it IS a score. Reviewing a call resulting in a man on base is equivalent to reviewing Offsides in hockey.

by Danwood on Jun 3, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

But in hockey

the only way to score is to put the puck in the goal. A HR is hardly the only way to score in baseball.

However, I think I got this off to a bit of a tangent. The point that I tried to make by bringing up video replay is that these types of changes improve the quality of the game. Whether it’s video replay or, say, a tweaking of the rules, things like that should be considered to imporove the game.

In this case, no one is arguing the umpire made the wrong call. No one. I just don’t buy the argument that “Well, there have been bad calls before. It’s just life.” No, there are ways to address mistakes.

In last night’s game, Selig can simply say that the wrong call was made, it should be reversed, and the game is over. The fact that there were other bad calls in thousands of games before this that weren’t overturned is irrelevant.

by jerry morales rules on Jun 3, 2010 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

+3

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let's see... overturning a call... blacks couldn't play....

Attaboy Worf – way to connect the dots.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Check the records

you’re in the minority on this one

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

which one?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're taking on the wrong argument here worf. why bring race into it...

If its not crucial to your tradition argument …why do this. Yes they were both traditions but race has nothing to do with making a call at first base yesterday …trying to equate them is very silly.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

btw

please get off your high horse railing against traditionalists - I AM NOT ONE - and objecting to the commish overturning something that happened in the game is no where near the same thing as segregation…or are you going to say I am pro-slavery next?

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

That seems to be where he's going with this.

I am for a lot of baseball traditions and have loved using instant replay for home runs…chiding people for being traditionalists to make your argument seem better is very silly. Issues should be discussed rather than trying to find a label for someone.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, it's that same slippery slope crap

that has kept replay out of baseball.

Every single time replay is brought up, you can count on some old fart to say, “Well, I don’t want balls and strikes”

NO ONE HAS EVER FREAKING TALKED ABOUT BALLS AND STRIKES! IT DOESN’T HAPPEN! EVERYONE GETS IT!

Your sacred “personal strike zone” where high strikes were called because the umpire couldn’t bend his fat ass over far enough to see the cutter at the knees will NEVER be changed!!!!

Every single objection to baseball trying something new basically comes back to “Well, that’s not how it was…”

And yes, that includes the desegregation of the game.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have added two polls.

One is on this post regarding replay (yes or no).

The other one is on the right sidebar asking whether Bud should award Galarraga a perfect game.

Please vote in both polls.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 2, 2010 10:27 PM CDT reply actions  

I would like to know

who the 40 some-odd people are who voted no to the replay…you should be flogged.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I voted yes.

However, I can see how individuals would vote no. Some people are just more traditionalists when it comes to baseball. I’m certain there are still many people against the Home Run replay. I like Al’s idea of replay, but I’m sure there are others who want to keep the game it’s always been without replay. But I’m always up for a good flogging!

by srwilly on Jun 3, 2010 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

They should be flogged, ostracized and made to wear Scarlet "T's"

for traditionalists. That way, children know to laugh at them and they will never again know the touch of a good woman

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey-can you come up with a different insult?

I’m about as traditionalist as they come. Yet when it comes to replay even I am for it. I don’t understand how anyone can be against it except for balls and strikes.

I don’t think “traditionalist” is necessarily a bad thing either. I’ve made my living for several years by painting sentimental rural scenes of my county before it disappears to encroaching suburbia. I’d proudly wear my “T”. Besides, I’d prefer not to know the touch of a good woman and my kids laugh at me anyway.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Katie, I would probably classify you as a "historian" over "traditionalist"

What I think Worf means when he says “traditionalist” – and feel free to correct me, big guy – is someone who steadfastly rejects improvement and innovation strictly on the grounds of “that’s the way it’s always been done”.

There’s nothing wrong with celebrating the past in art, whether you’re a painter or novelist. Tell you what – if you have a website I’d love to see some of your work.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like the sound of that...historian is better.

Even for the stuff like DH and jumbotron that I am against, it’s for better reasons than simply “get off my lawn.”

I do have a website, but I hesitate to post it here since the only thing baseball related about any of my work is that I have one painting called “Righty” and another called “Lefty.” Hmmm… wonder what inspired that.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm kind of a "retro artist" in my own right

I belong to an Internet-based group of fans that like old 60s sitcoms, and I’ve written a couple fanfiction “lost episodes” based on them. Fun to do, and the group really enjoys reading them!

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

That sounds really cool.

I’d probably be interested in that too.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

When people have to use a label to make their argument better I never

listen to their argument. It’s a shame that the squeaky wheel ever gets the grease…I have no idea if I’m considered a traditionalist in general but I don’t care much what worf would think that’s for sure. If you have a valid argument you sure don’t need a label to make a point.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely

When you get in the way of progress just because of fear or change, you are a “traditionalist”

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hear you


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry Katie, but I don't think he can

all I can tell you is consider the source.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're really out there on a limb today worf...first you play the race card,

Now you’re equating those who disagree with you as adulterers? are you trying to offend as many people as you can?

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

You went about it the wrong way.

If you have a valid argument there’s no need for labels.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wait...I thought ties go to the runner?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

For those of you who say it cannot be implemented due to changing the history of the game...

Wake up! If MLB had the technology that we do today, they would have absolutely used it. The game needs to change as time goes on.

by Adam U on Jun 2, 2010 10:27 PM CDT reply actions  

He also caused the earthquake in haiti!

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)

by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jun 2, 2010 10:56 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

There was a hilarious Tweet tonight

something to the effect that “Jim Joyce declared Florida’s beaches safe”.

Sittin' on the ledge and sippin' Kool-Aid...

by EalyEagle on Jun 2, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jim Joyce

If you rearrange the letters and translate to mandarin chinese, then to latin and back to Hebrew and then into English again you get Pontius Pilate…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a lot like Ron Santo's HOF candidacy

I don’t need a bunch of writers and ex-players telling me whether or not Ron Santo is a Hall of Famer. I know he is. Same with Armando Galarraga – I saw for myself tonight that he threw a perfect game. A blown call isn’t going to change my mind.

Sittin' on the ledge and sippin' Kool-Aid...

by EalyEagle on Jun 2, 2010 10:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Well, you have a point.

But the record books won’t say so.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

To quote Chico Marx, "Who are you gonna believe - me or your eyes?"

Videotape will endure just as long as scribblings on a page (to simplify), and in this case visual history may even trump written history.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Much as I agree with you about Ron or Galarraga,

Having your record part of history is important and very meaningful. It is a damn shame that Galarraga had that happen to him…I’m sure the tearful apology from the ump meant something to him, but the record there would mean even more to show your family.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

at the same time

I am sure Armando would like to have that moment of jubilation…just like when you graduate you need to have that ceremony to bring closure and a reality to it.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

The amount of perfect games this year

and no hitters in recent years must be a sign that the steroid era is coming to a close.

by mic on Jun 2, 2010 11:08 PM CDT reply actions  

or that the use has just switched more

to pitchers instead.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 3, 2010 2:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Always the optimist, eh?

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is good

I lost a lot of faith in baseball starting the year Brady Anderson hit 50 homers.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Current HR Leaders

Corey Hart has 14, Jose Bautista and Paul Konerko have 16. That roughly projects to season totals between 42 and 48 – quite a comedown from ten years ago!

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

That should have been a no brainer.

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

MLB should award him the perfect game

and credit him with the only 28 out prefect game in history.

That would be justice.

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)

by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jun 2, 2010 11:19 PM CDT reply actions  

If you're going to do replay

Do replay. Don’t have some stupid “challenge” system. It’s like “We’re using replay to get the calls right. Except if they blow more than two calls a game. Then we don’t care if an ump blows it.”

If we’re going to use replay, then use it to get the calls right. Don’t play some stupid game about whether people should throw a flag because maybe an ump will blow a call later in the game.

If there’s a close play, ask the umps. If they feel it deserves a replay, they’ll ask for help. None of them want to be Jim Joyce and even if one does, there are three other umps who could overrule them and go to replay.

Just say no to a stupid NFL-style challenge system.

by Josh Timmers on Jun 2, 2010 11:34 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

The nice thing about the NFL is it puts value on the challenges.

In sports that don’t often Coaches use their appeals as competitive tools in order to buy time for their guys who need them.

If some manager needs time for his bullpen to warm he can just ask for a replay, then walk out to the mound very very very slowly.

(This story was produced by BCPDnewservice. Our motto: If you don’t like this story then suck it!)

by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jun 2, 2010 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with both of you here lol.

It’s easy to say don’t have challenges…or that they will slow down the game because replay without them probably wouldn’t be evenly used. It’s a difficult choice how to handle it besides balls and strikes and I hope a reason it hasn’t been implemented it…better than tradition for sure.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ridiculous comment except fire Lou

No way do you fire a great umpire like Jim Joyce. He had the marbles to make the call he saw whether it was right or wrong. In this case it was wrong. Not his fault we got to see replay and he didn’t.

United we stand and united we'll fall......down on our knees the day we win it all!

by Bricks and Ivy on Jun 3, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

I said the same thing when I flipped on Baseball Tonight – big props to Jim Joyce…I want him as a permanent member of the post-season crew…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

So he can make more wrong calls and then apologize?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree it sucks he blew the call

but regardless of the situation he makes what he thinks is the right call – had this not been a perfect game noone would have known about this call because it was really close…not a horrifically blown call…

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, yes.

He’s human. It happens. By all accounts he’s a quality umpire who happened to mess up at the worst possible moment. I am a firm believer that people who are good at their job for 20+ years should get a second chance. I believe it even more firmly because he’s admitted it. Now, obviously if it becomes a consistent issue he should consider retiring.

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

One thing I don't get with the call.

Why didn’t he ask for help since there was so much at stake on that call? I know he thought he was certain it was an out, but why not take a one minute umpire conference and see what the others thought?

by srwilly on Jun 3, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I want him suspended for a week myself

If he was defiant and arrogant, I’d want him fired.

By all accounts, Joyce is very apologetic and doesn’t seem to be the kind of guy who would blow a call for notoriety. (Joe West)

But there still must be accountability.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

why?

was is that bad of a call if it wasnt a perfect game?

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mistakes are only as severe as the results they cause

So, it wouldn’t have been as IMPACTFUL a call. It would have been just as bad a call, but the results wouldn’t have been as bad.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

so

if he makes the same mistake in a 1 run game and then the next batter the pitcher allows a 2 run homer he should get suspended for a week? pretty soon we wont have any umpires since they all make mistakes.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

On this point I have to agree with you.

When the umpire admits his mistake, I don’t see it helping a lot to discipline him…because then it’s on the commissioner to do something about it. They make mistakes all the time and overall sure they should be disciplined for mistakes, that way you have the best ones working playoff games.One way is already on the books but I don’t see it being used well…the “grading system”. Seems to me umps are used just as frequently with seniority as accuracy.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not even God wanted to see Big Z pitch tonight

Hence the inclement weather.

In all seriousness, poor Galarraga. Kid deserved that and got screwed.

RIP Ken Griffey Jr. You will be missed, well the pre 2001 you. Nah, kidding. Class act. I still have a Griffey 24 Mariners jersey from when I was a wee lad.

"I don't know what the big deal about Crackerjack is"

by theGraceyslumpbuster on Jun 3, 2010 12:22 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

This is why I read this site every day.

Al makes more sense with this proposal than many mainstream analysts.

My respects, Al.

That umpire’s call is inexcusable and unforgivable. He erased history and ruined the enjoyment of the game, even though there was no malice or ill will on his part. However, let me congratulate the umpire for being a man, admit his mistake and tell the player he was sorry for the error. The pressure should not be on the umpire but on the Commissioner to prevent this from happening ever again, by instituting replay for this kind of call.

by Fraggin Judge on Jun 3, 2010 1:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Inexcusable? Unforgivable?

The guy blew the call on a perfect game. He didn’t accidentally launch a nuclear missile at British Columbia.

That said, it was a bad mistake.

And count me as a “no” for instant replay. Baseball doesn’t need to become like the NFL.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Jun 3, 2010 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Baseball doesn't need to become like the NFL"

Getting calls that were wrong right is turning baseball in to football? All replay would do is get calls that were wrong and make them right.

Insert Clever Statement Here

by MrNFL on Jun 3, 2010 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

In reference to the length of games?

I’m going to try to find the average time it took to play an NFL game last season for comparison’s sake. Meanwhile, Stats Inc. reported that the average length of an MLB game in 2009 was 2:52.

I’ll keep digging, but If it turns out that the average length of an NFL game is between 3:00 and 3:05 (which is what I would guess), I’d be willing to endure the extra 10 minutes if it’s devoted to instant replay and getting calls right.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's it? That's your play?

Baseball doesn’t need to become like the NFL?

You mean the most powerful sports organization in the history of the planet? You mean an entity whose PRESEASON games routinely outdo other sports’ postseasons, whose DRAFT is now arguably the fourth-biggest event in the TV year (Super Bowl, Final Four, World Series and NFL Draft)? You mean an organization that strikes fear into the hearts of every TV executive, opposing commissioner and union leader?

Yeah, why would anyone want to actually be successful?

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 6:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

This isn't about not becoming like the NFL.

It’s about getting calls right. When a ruling that is so obviously called the wrong way occurs, like the one last night, the best thing—actually, the only thing—baseball can do is adapt to the circumstances. If that means replay, that is fine with me.

And in case you haven’t noticed it this year, or really, since last October, the umpiring in baseball has been utterly horrendous. There were numerous bad calls in the playoffs last year. There were close calls that are wrong that have been made in almost every week this year. And now this.

It’s not about turning into the NFL. It’s about getting the calls right. And I think that’s what everyone wants.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Preparing to hike to the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire on Saturday....

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jun 3, 2010 7:09 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

well said

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't make me pull this car over!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Be a good boy now...


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's a man baby!

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Jun 3, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Man baby?


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Guilty as charged, officer!

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can't resist

childlike behavior, can you?

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Jun 3, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

No to replay

And most definitely NO to crediting Galarraga with a perfect game. I can’t think of one time in the history of baseball when that has been done. Even the 1919 Reds are still credited with winning the World Series. The Tigers still WON the game tonight, and that should be the most important thing to their fans.

As for replay, a bad call has as much chance going for your team as against it. When I watch my favorite NFL team play, it’s hard to even celebrate a touchdown because it’s inevitable the play will be reviewed. I don’t want that for baseball. Humans make mistakes, and human error has been a part of baseball since the beginning.

"See the stars they're shining bright, everything's alright tonight."

by markleonette on Jun 3, 2010 1:40 AM CDT reply actions  

disagree

Football is a different sport with thousands of things happening at once. Baseball only follows the ball. And yes a perfect game means more than just another win, the tigers will win around 82 of them this year, but theres only been 20 (21*) perfect games in history. My post below explains a replay system that would keep human error but also keep us from plays that only besmirch the game of baseball.

by northpaw22k on Jun 3, 2010 2:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not every play in the NFL is reviewable

Off-sides, false-starts, holding, etc., aren’t reviewable. It really just comes down to, as you say, following the ball (touchdowns, in/out of bounds, spotting the ball, etc.).

Your plan would be great for tonights game, but how often does a bases empty play cause an uproar?

"See the stars they're shining bright, everything's alright tonight."

by markleonette on Jun 3, 2010 2:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't.

But in the cases where it IS important, let’s replay it. Why wouldn’t you want to get the calls right?

I’m tired of the “human error” argument. If replay technology had been available in 1900, we’d have had replay for 100+ years. Early baseball magnates weren’t afraid of innovation. Why should we be now?

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

because Al

we have 100+ years of tradition that wont allow us to make changes, do you want to piss off the ghost of Ty Cobb…seriously, baseball was best when noone wore gloves and they used caps with tiny bills and the best slugger of the day hit 3 home runs, there were 1400 in attendance for a sold out game and those dang flapper women couldnt vote but rather were getting busy with the colored “farm hands”… GET OVER YOURSELVES AND YOUR DA%N TRADITION – its called adaptation, survival of the fittest, using everything available to you

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, if nothing else, this one call has kick-started the replay conversation in earnest.

I see only two viable alternatives.

1. Overturn the blown call in the best interest of the game and award Galarraga (as was suggested above) the only 28-out perfect game in MLB history. AND use this event as the foundation for a meaningful institution of replay review (non balls & strikes).

2. Leave the call as is and use this event as the foundation for a meaningful institution of replay review (non balls & strikes).

Therefore, the Commissioner of Baseball will do the following: nothing.

We have met the enemy and they are us! ~ Walt Kelly, Pogo, 1971

by Zeke on Jun 3, 2010 1:42 AM CDT reply actions  

The problem with overturning the call is that...

already a player batted after the call to make the last out. If the call on first is reversed that hitter becomes the last out of the game. There can be no perfect game with more than 27 outs. What does MLB do with what would be out # 28? Does the at-bat is erased, improving the hitter’s numbers artificially to preserve the pitcher’s perfect game?

I think we’re stuck with this call, unfortunately, just as we’re stuck with all other bad calls made, including the last one in Seattle that decided the game for the Mariners last night. What a season for blown calls!

by Fraggin Judge on Jun 3, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I have to say the tradition of making blown calls is horrible and should be changed.

As much as I’d like to see the call overturned there sure are consequences to it happening.
I hope it does bring about meaningful debate and action with instant replay.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Out #28 never happened

I don’t see what is so hard about this.

This wouldn’t be a 28-out perfect game, because the overturned call would be the final out.

Both the at-bat and the result are erased.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about...

2 Replays per team only on bases empty plays and inning ending force plays. This will keep from having to award runners bases after overturned calls and would basically maintain the “human element” while keeping us from these plays tonight.

by northpaw22k on Jun 3, 2010 2:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Wish the poll had a middle ground

EVERY play being reviewable would be a drag (not to mention nearly impossible unless the camera angles on broadcasts drastically improve).

I’m in favor of replay expanded beyond pure HR calls, have been for a very long time. But I really don’t want every catch to be reviewed for trap or catch.

Maybe do it a little like the NBA where replay rules expand only in the final 2 minutes/OT. Not that every game is actually decided in the 8/9, but its definitely a middle ground.

Also, I wish they’d start employing YOUNGER umpires. When your job depends on being able to see, move and keep up with 20 somethings its pretty silly to expect overweight 50 y/os to be correct all the time.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 3, 2010 2:43 AM CDT reply actions  

This.
Also, I wish they’d start employing YOUNGER umpires. When your job depends on being able to see, move and keep up with 20 somethings its pretty silly to expect overweight 50 y/os to be correct all the time.

Just ask anyone who ever watched the seismic anomaly of Bruce Froemming trying to run down the third base line to see a play in left field.

"One of the things I like about baseball is that between innings you can go to the restroom.'' ~Manny Acta.

by Goodie1969 on Jun 3, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

The one problem area I see with replay

is the force at second on a double play. It’s an unwritten rule that all you need is to get close to the bag. I’ve always been fine with this because I think it keeps the risk of an injury at a minimum.

Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene."

by cdz3210 on Jun 3, 2010 3:13 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't like that unwritten rule.

You still need to touch the bag for a force out.

by srwilly on Jun 3, 2010 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

The destruction of a great tradition...
This would have the added benefit of eliminating manager ejections — since they wouldn’t be out there yelling and screaming

One of the most colorful, entertaining and fun parts of the baseball ritual is when two (almost) elderly, overweight men stand potbelly to potbelly, noses a fraction of an inch apart, heads slightly tilted (as if for a kiss) yelling at each other with almighty rightousness of their lungs. Add to this, dirt kicking, cap stomping and base throwing, the spice of a good manager/umpire courtship dance.

Al, do you really want to destroy this?
 
 
;-)


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 4:03 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Yes, actually I do.

Enough of the stupid histrionics. GET THE CALLS RIGHT.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

cant we have both

rather than throwing a flag, or having a button they could push, require the manager to go out there and get into a fight with the umps, during the fight someone else reviews the play and after the manager is ejected they announce the decision…if the play is reveresed the manager stays, if not then he is gone, bingo – limits the replays and gives fans something entertaining to watch while we wait.

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

LMAO


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 8:06 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

How about if they fight about something else?

Like what a great call it its.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

ESPN just showed a collage of baseball commentators talking about the call.

All of them said something to the effect of “He was out!”

This includes Marty Brennaman.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Preparing to hike to the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire on Saturday....

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jun 3, 2010 6:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Oh, well then...I'm glad Marty cleared that all up for us...

We have met the enemy and they are us! ~ Walt Kelly, Pogo, 1971

by Zeke on Jun 3, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marty Brennaman said he was out?

That’s it, I’ve changed my position. HE WAS SAFE!

"One of the things I like about baseball is that between innings you can go to the restroom.'' ~Manny Acta.

by Goodie1969 on Jun 3, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm against replay...

But give this guy his perfect game.

by Pre on Jun 3, 2010 7:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Each team should get one no-fault replay.

After that, a replay request that upholds the umpire’s call should cost the team calling it an out.

Yankees suck.

by Steaming Pile on Jun 3, 2010 7:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Uh, no.

If you’re going to implement replay, don’t start taking away outs from people. Just give them one or two challenges and leave it in the hands of a replay official to determine when a replay is necessary.

by Pre on Jun 3, 2010 7:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

You lose a down in the NFL (I think).

In pro tennis, you just get so many per match, and when they’re gone, they’re gone. You probably have the right idea there. You have to limit them, or else games will start to drag on. I’d say you get one per game – the umps are usually pretty sharp in MLB.

Yankees suck.

by Steaming Pile on Jun 3, 2010 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

you lose a time out in the NFL

and in tennis, which I am a casual fan of, they give them enough to handle a fair amount of calls. Ive never seen a time in tennis where they question running out of challenges.

The NBA and NHL is more like the model. If the call is questionable, they look at it. Simple as that. Ive said before, there is probably only a handful of games a year that have more than 1 questionable call. very few with more than 1.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

edit

Very few with more than 2.
Still on 1st cup. :)

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Long against Now favor

I’ve long apposed this idea but the contrast of this call and how seamlessly replays worked in the hawks game led me to change my mind last night. Why not. What’s the harm. If they can get the call right using replay then that should be an option. They did it twice in the Stanley Cup Finals.

by mph3 on Jun 3, 2010 7:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Here's how it could work:

Replay allowed on:

  • Plays on bases (including whether a runner left too early on a sac fly)
  • Catches
  • Fair/foul
  • Homer/Ground Rule 2B
  • Hit batsmen (I’ve read a couple of ump biographies, and they will tell you that because of the angle, HBP that clip the uniform or hit the foot are very tough calls)
  • Those couple of times a year when someone loses track of the outs or the count.

Not allowed on:

  • Balls/strikes
  • Balks
  • Interference plays
  • Neighborhood plays at 2nd
  • Check swings

Bases:

  • If a player ruled out is found to be safe, he is awarded that base only

Catches:

  • If a called out is found to be a trap, the batter is awarded a single and runners move up one base
  • If a called trap is found to be a catch, runners may return to their original bases without penalty

Foul/fair

  • If a ball is called foul, but is ruled to be fair, batter is credited with a single and runners move up one base UNLESS it is the judgement of all four umps and the replay official that circumstances (deep fly ball; shot on the baseline; runners moving) that more bases would have been achieved.

(Or, you can take that out of the equation and just say it’s a single if it doesn’t leave the infield and a double and two bases if it does)

Hit batsmen:

  • Any pitch ruled to hit the batter and then found to have missed him is a ball, unless he swung, in which case it should have been called a strike anyway

I did that in 5 minutes with a baby screaming at me. It ain’t hard.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 7:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I disagree with you on "neighborhood plays".

… because they should be covered under your “plays at bases” comment — that’s what a “neighborhood play” is.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't have a problem with neighborhood plays

on double-plays because those are clearly safety issues. So long as both teams get the same break, I’m good.

But I’m also not going to go to the mattresses for it either. If neighboorhood plays go in, fair enough.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

aw-poor baby

Unless he’s screaming because you finally got sick of Barney and shut him off. In that case, let him cry.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, we had a bad diaper

The kind where you not only want to wash your hands, but jump in the shower, after changing it.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Please tell me you changed it

and didn’t wait for your wife to.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wife was already at work

Or else I’d be facing divorce proceedings for finishing my post before changing the diaper

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's reading stuff like this...

… that makes me glad my kids are teenagers.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

No kidding.

My "baby’ is graduating from H.S. tomorrow!

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Congrats!

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

thanks

It will be sooo nice not fighting with him to do his homework night after night. At least not in person. I’m sure I’ll be texting some words of wisdom while he’s away at college, but it won’t be the same.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

So know we are looking at

4+ hr games. Goodness the league doesn’t need this.
 I just can’t fathom this.

by Grockcubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's bullshit

It would have taken a minute, tops, to overturn last night’s call.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

100% correct.

How long does it take for HR replays now? There have been two or three of them at Wrigley — the delays were less than three minutes.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

No what is bullshit

if you have 3 or 4 replays, or how many is allowed. What do you allow? Your laundry list of calls to replayed would have the possibility of adding more than just 60 seconds.
 This just opens a can that does not need to be open.

by Grockcubs on Jun 3, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

It does need to be opened.

And obviously, HR replays are done in only a couple minutes, shorter than any argument. Get it done.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Word, you complete me.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 3, 2010 8:59 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Worf.

Damn iPhone.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Jun 3, 2010 9:00 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Replay

is used in every major sport. Even tennis uses it. There might be the game every so often that needs more than 1 replay, but most games dont even need 1. When there is a close call, the tv coverage sees it immediately, so there must be a way to let the mgr know. thats the way the NFL does it. the booth person makes the decision most the time not the coach.
there is enough time between plays with baseball to have a “booth” person decide wether or not a replay is eveb worth looking at.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 7:59 AM CDT reply actions  

Can I change my vote?

to “not sure” on whether the call should be reversed. My initial response was to say yes, it should. However, upon reading some of the arguments against I now think it may be a stupid precedent to set (especially with a commish like Bud).

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 8:13 AM CDT reply actions  

In the picture above

Galaraggas’s foot isn’t touching first. It’s close (way closer than some guys feet at second turning a DP), but it’s not touching. When I watched the replay, the ball definitely beat the runner, but the pitcher dropped his heel down a moment after he caught the ball. I couldn’t tell for sure from the replays (which were all from the second base side, and didn’t show this angle) whether the rest of Galaragga’s foot was already touching first before his heel dropped down.

This picture makes me wonder whether the play was closer than we though on first look.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Jun 3, 2010 8:17 AM CDT reply actions  

I guess it depends on how you interpret the video,

but to me, Galaragga’s foot was clearly on the base before the runner’s foot hit the bag. You can see the base sag under Galaragga’s pressure. And Joyce, who clearly has some interest in this, admitted he blew the call after seeing the video.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are a couple of vidcaps...

… I have seen, that clearly show Galarraga’s foot on the base while Donald’s foot was at least a half step away.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

It wasn't even that close a play, compared to hundreds of really close plays one sees at first.

On the flip side, if Joyce had called Donald out, dollars to donuts (although that’s pretty much an even bet these days) that the Indians wouldn’t have protested the call.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

its funny you said protest.

I cannot recall a time when a protest was actually upheld. Ive heard that teams were playing the game under protest several times. I guess thats just a joke.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

George Brett would like to have a word with you.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jeez.

how can I forget that one. Just saw it like 2 weeks ago on MLB network. Was explaining it to my wife. At least im on my 2nd cup now.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Indians

looked almost as excited about the whole thing as the Tigers. No way.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 3, 2010 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why would the Tribe protest?

they had no right He was out, shit happens.

by Grockcubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've seen the replay

from a few additional angles this morning, so I see where you’re coming from. But I’m going to say something that I’m sure is a little controversial: On the last out of the game, you gotta give that call to the pitcher.

And yes, it was a closer play than it initially looked, but he Joyce still got it wrong.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 3, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely correct

My post above. If you make a mistake in that situation as an umpire, you make sure you make it in favor of the pitcher in that situation. Make SURE you aren’t taking something away from him.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with you in this case...just makes me a little uneasy that an ump would

make a mistake on purpose. Definitely agree that it shouldn’t happen to mar a perfect game.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Had it been a close play the other way

and Joyce had gotten it right, I for one would have been celebrating his honor and guts.

But I agree that human nature would seem to say that the ump would basically be realllly sure about a safe call. That’s what makes this all the more bizarre.

As I see the replay, he clearly is starting the fist-pump “out” call. I think the guy just had vapor-lock and lost the connection between his brain and his hand.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

He said so. Said he was in good position (and was) and just missed the call.

He’s a stand up guy for sure. You know West would have blown bullshit out of his ass in the same place. Joyce went to the pitcher’s locker room and apologized to him. That’s class.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also

there didn’t seem to be anybody who was less upset than Galaragga, including the umpire. In interviews after the game, he just seemed genuinely excited at how well he pitched, and hoped he could keep it up in future starts. It really didn’t sound like lip service and it wasn’t said through gritted teeth. That man has an amazing attitude.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Jun 3, 2010 8:30 AM CDT reply actions  

From the link above in Als's lead-in copy
“You guys like me all watched the TV and saw the replays,” Galarraga said, “and for any pitcher in any league anywhere, that was a perfect game. When you watch the replays, it was totally an out. There’s no way he can call that safe. That’s what made me sad. I can’t help it. I really can’t help it.”

mlb.com

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Definitely for replay

wish the Cubs could replay every game this year.

"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will

by Slakkr on Jun 3, 2010 8:52 AM CDT reply actions  

iswydt

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

No to replay

This all baseball needs, more length in games, more trips to the clubhouse to discuss calls, goodness how many bang/bang calls will get replayed. What do you allow? How many do you get?
 Sorry, I am in the minority I know that, but no to 4 hour games, and more bullshit.

by Grockcubs on Jun 3, 2010 8:53 AM CDT reply actions  

I really think they'd try to figure out a way

for this to work so that it didn’t lengthen the game too much. Even if it did I’d rather have the calls right.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

What a shame...

…this whole thing is. Joyce must have had complete brain lock, because the call really wasn’t all that close.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Jun 3, 2010 8:57 AM CDT reply actions  

It is

I am just glad Galarraga took the high road. Class act. He knows Joyce botched the call. Joyce, and I give him credit he apologized the same. He knows what a jackass call he made.

by Grockcubs on Jun 3, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Very classy move...

…by Joyce and I give him credit for that.

I would like to see some type of safety net for situations like this, whether it is a challenge or a booth review, they need to do something.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Jun 3, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

They showed on baseball tonight

That he was watching the first baseman field the ball and then moved his eyes to first base too late.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

One thing is for certain

The heat will he turned on Selig/MLB like no one has ever seen before. The immediate, widespread, unanimous response to this one play last night astounded me. Instant replay, cable/satellite TV, and the internet really contributed to how we feel this morning. Yet MLB refuses to use these same tools to enhance the game on the field. Crazy.

by JFCubFan on Jun 3, 2010 9:08 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

The heat should have been turned on much sooner

like with the botched calls in the playoffs last year. Crazy is right.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Please vote in BOTH polls if you haven't....

… the one on this post is about replay; there is also one on the right sidebar on the front page asking if Bud should overturn the ruling and award a perfect game.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Note

Have also added the second poll so it is visible on this page as well as the front page (see right sidebar).

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

All of this talk

And no one’s mentioned Dale Scott’s blown call at 2nd base in the Twins-Ms game last night? Sure, Joyce’s blunder cost Galarraga a perfecto – real shame, except that he retired the next batter and the Tigers won anyway. Scott cost the Twins a victory. Not a sure win (they were in extras already), but the correct call would have gotten them out of the inning. Instead, Josh Wilson was called safe at 2nd, and the Mariners’ winning run (in the form of Ryan Langerhans) scampered home.

The new face of safe at second:

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 9:16 AM CDT reply actions  

twins are constant targets of crappy calls

that, last postseason’s, and this

Self-Proclaimed President of the Castro Boobird Face Kicking Club
The Chicago Blackhawks: The only Chicago team worth caring about.

by jesus christos on Jun 3, 2010 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

But in the tough-luck sweepstakes

The Twins were victorious. http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=7017521

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I understand the time concerns

but hasn’t that ship already sailed? it seems like the people who aren’t watching baseball because the game is long and slow already left a long time ago. It’s more likely that people will get frustrated and stop watching because of blown calls and a failure to rectify the situation than because the game is long.

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 9:21 AM CDT reply actions  

There shouldn't be any time concerns.

How many of these would you have? Maybe two a game AT MOST? If you have a proper review setup, no delay would be longer than a couple minutes, shorter than many of the idiotic arguments you have now.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is what is key

Replay MUST come with a complete and total ban on leaving the dugout or your position to argue.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right!

That should be a fair tradeoff. Managers and players would understand that the calls are going to be got correct — therefore there would be no need for arguing.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hopefully that would reduce some of the time added from instant replay being used.

Though balls and strikes would still be in play…I’d think some managers would still get ejected when you have plays like Byrd getting hosed on a ball a foot out of the strike zone.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with this as well

I doubt it would add a lot of time to the games. But even if all of the worst fears of instant replay came true it doesn’t seem like it would change people’s interest in the game, you know?

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

What is most surprising about this call

is how it contrast to other amazing umpire calls that they do get right. I am continually shocked at bang-bang plays at first. The Cubs make an out, I get mad, they show the replay and the umpire got it right. The speed of baseball is amazing – see Starlin Castro web gems for proof. The number of right calls that umpires get right today should not be overlooked.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 9:26 AM CDT reply actions  

That's the most underrated aspect of replay

In the 1970s, umpires feared replay (scoreboard replay and TV replay) but it showed that 95 percent of the time, they are right.

Replay will make the umpires look a lot better than they think

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely.

I would think that a fair amount of the time — just as in the NFL — the replay would CONFIRM the result on the field.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like the Paper industry when email and the internet came out

The paper industry thought no one would print anymore – why print an email? The opposite occurred – paper demand shot up as people printed more information.

Replay could provide additional umpire jobs.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Correct - umps should see this as a tool to help them out

instead of a threat to their jobs.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Joyce does now

If he had replay last night, he would have been saved from being a goat, and nobody would have remembered his name. He is gonna be infamous now.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course they get most calls right.

Let’s get ALL of them right.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Be careful what you wish for

What happens to the in-the-neighborhood call for a double play? It would have to go away or managers would be challenging it and the runner would be safe at second.

There goes Starlin Castro’s ankle in a snap.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's a nice thought but impossible to work for all cases.

It would definitely help but there still will be plays instant replay can’t solve. It’s not always definitive. Just as it isn’t in football.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

FWIW --

Mariano Rivera and Leyland have called Joyce one of the best. He was 2nd in an SI poll among players.

But Don Denkinger was considered a great ump, and went on to be crew chief of the 1991 World Series, which was as tense and pressure-packed a series as you’d ever see.

Richie Garcia was considered a great ump.

It happens to the greatest, which is why there should be replay.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Hmm...I sure did hear last night how many MLB players regard him as one of the best.

I think it is interesting here that no one has brought up the fact the Tigers had this happen to them. Allie may disagree with me, but to me this would have been even bigger than it is had it happened to the Yanks or Sawks…imagine the media getting ahold of that. Action on this would be more likely to happen to me. Had Sabathia gotten hosed on that call for a perfect game…I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say death threats would have been made.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

If MLB

Decides to overturn the call, I wouldn’t have a problem with it, especially since it WAS the 27th out. its not like anyone else would have had a chance after that.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 9:41 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd love to see

last night’s call be reversed and stand as a perfect game.

But while debating this in office this morning, we brought up an interesting point. What happens if Jason Donald, who was given the hit, hits safely in the next 55 games.

Would we grant him the record for longest hitting streak?

by jthack on Jun 3, 2010 9:42 AM CDT reply actions  

No

It’s a zero-sum game. If the call is reversed, he didn’t get a hit. If the call stands, there is no perfect game. It’s either-or.

If the call is reversed, his stats should reflect it, just as Gallaraga’s WHIP and BAA reflects a hit.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe I didn't word it correctly...

Hypothetical: The call is reversed, so no hit was awarded. Donald hits safely in 55 consecutive games, beginning today.

I tend to believe there would be an outcry about the reversal, which keeps him from “hitting safely in 57 games.”

Likely to happen, of course not. Just bringing up a different point.

by jthack on Jun 3, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

If it's reversed

then the hit didn’t happen. If Donald is going to whine about it, he should shut up.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

There's no way Donald would complain about it.

As noted above, he seemed genuinely surprised to have been called safe.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

what if the cubs go on a 25 game win streak

This is likely to happen as that. that fact is that he was out. and to punish the pitcher, and the ump for that matter for HISTORY, is a pretty big deal.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting tweet from Keith Olbermann:

Sources confirm MLB Commissioner’s Office meeting this morning to discuss Galarraga/Joyce “Imperfect Game” + if remedy is possible

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Stark on ESPN

just said that as well. He said he thinks they should overturn the call.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Very interesting....

I really hope that Selig does the right thing here. This is simply too significant and egregious an error to let stand. He can’t give that kid back the special moment, but he can allow him to have his rightful place in history.

by Damen Jackson on Jun 3, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

AGREED

“he can allow him to have his rightful place in history.”

That is huge. First time 3 perfectos in one season. and its only june 3.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

The home run era

is officially over! Viva La Pitcher!!

by Damen Jackson on Jun 3, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

More from..

Olbermann’s blog:

Some in the Commissoner’s office were to urge Selig to declare that with Joyce’s admission, the 27th out of the game was recorded when Cleveland’s Jason Donald grounded out, first baseman Miguel Cabrera to pitcher Galarraga, covering first. The base hit credited to Donald, and the following at bat, by Cleveland’s Trevor Crowe, would be wiped off the books and thus Galarraga would be credited with a perfect game.

There is precedent for the Commissioner’s Office to decide what is, and isn’t, a perfect game. On September 4, 1991, a so-called “Statistical Accuracy Committee” ruled that the game would only official recognize as perfect games, ones in which pitchers retired 27 (or more) consecutive batters and completed the game without a batter reaching first base. The ruling wiped off the books the 1959 game in which Harvey Haddix of Pittsburgh pitched 12 perfect innings, only to lose the game to Milwaukee on a base hit. It also erased the 1917 game in which then-pitcher Babe Ruth of the Boston Red Sox had walked the lead off batter, then been ejected by the umpire for arguing the call. Reliever Ernie Shore entered the game with none out and that runner on first, who was promptly caught stealing. Shore then retired the 26 batters he faced, and had, at the time of the Commissioner’s Office ruling, been credited with a perfect game for more than 74 years. 48 more no-hit games were also erased by the re-definition of the rules.

There are also countless instances of umpires’ on-field decisions being reviewed and even overruled by the now dormant offices of the Presidents of the American and National League. One such review confirmed a controversial “out” ruling that ultimately decided the 1908 NL pennant. More recently, in 1983, after Kansas City’s George Brett had hit a two-out, 9th inning home run to bring his team from behind to ahead in a game in New York, umpire Tim McClelland determined that Brett had broken the rules by having the gripping substance “pine tar” further up his bat than rules permitted. McClelland nullified Brett’s home run and called him out for the final out of the game. Within days, American League President Lee MacPhail had overruled McClelland, declared the home run valid, and ordered the game replayed, more than a month later, from the point directly after Brett’s home run.

I can see the point here. Usually, I’d be against overruling an on-field ruling like this — even when so clearly wrong — but based on what Olbermann writes about precedent, I think there are compelling reasons to overturn the on-field ruling.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Moreover

There is absolutely no negative impact, other than a miniscule effect on Donald’s AVG/OBP (which is counteracted by taking away an out from Crowe)

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, it's not really "counteracted"...

… because those are two different players. Crowe benefits, Donald doesn’t. I doubt either player would complain.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, they won't complain.

Donald already said he felt bad. I’m glad to see there is a precedent for it. It would potentially open up a box on other calls, past and present…so they will have to be very careful about this. Let’s hope instant replay is an outcome of it.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

In the 1908 case, the National League board of directors

upheld NL President Harry Pulliam’s decision to support umpire Hank O’Day’s ruling that Fred Merkle was out at 2nd on September 23, 1908. About 10 days earlier, in an almost identical situation (also involving the Cubs), O’Day had ruled that a Pittsburgh runner named Warren Gill could not be called out at second, and Pulliam supported that call. In both cases, the bottom line was that the ump’s call was supported. Would the MLB front office go in this direction in the Joyce case? I don’t know. But, at least in the 1908 case, the precedent is to allow the ump’s call to stand. One difference is that O’Day stood by his call(s), where Joyce admits his mistake.

One nitpick: The Merkle call did not actually decide the 1908 pennant race. There were still a lot games to be played. The game was replayed because the Cubs and Giants ended up in a dead heat. The October 8 replay decided the pennant.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

The video factor

In the Merkle play, there was no recorded visual evidence to conclusively prove he did/didn’t touch second base. But now we have the benefit of video that shows Galarraga touched the bag before Donald got there, despite Joyce calling Donald safe.

Would modern technology trump this precedent?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

The replays provide convincing evidence.

And that could be the difference — should be the difference.

Actually, in 1908 they had a lot of evidence as to what happened, even though that play has gone down as a kind of baseball Roshomon. O’Day’s decision was based more on Joe McGinnity’s interference with the play than Evers’ force out of Merkle, an aspect of the controversy that often gets lost in the telling because the rest of the story is so insane.

One of Lee Elia's 15%

by waiting4cubs on Jun 3, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Question is, will MLB supoort the Umpire or the Umpire's call?

Because the Umpire has said he made a mistake.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I want a job on the Statistical Accuracy Committee!

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Should other bad calls be reversed?

Should the 1985 World Series be given to the Cardinals because of Denkinger’s bad call?

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

A fair question

I’ve read some arguments that this is different because it was the last play of the game. The Denkinger play came with no outs in the bottom of the ninth.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Pay no attention to the straw men

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

We’ll get all the Old Royals and Cardinals together and replay the 9th inning with one out and Steve Balboni up to bat…

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Reading is FUNdamental

Ealy told you it was different. Now you’re just being obstinate. (Look it up)

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the vocabulary lesson

And if read his comment you’ll see he said it was a fair question with SOME arguments saying they are different.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's just being nice

I am not burdened by that obligation

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fine

But you open up Pandora’s Box by changing history. What about the 2007 Wild Card game between the Rockies and Padres? Replays showed that Holliday never touched home plate. Should that result be changed? Change the call to Holliday being out and there’s one out with a man on first.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

No... you do it going forward

You can throw all the examples up you want. It will still be stupid and wrong and a complete missing of the point.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you're advocating changing the result to a perfect game

it does impact past examples. If you want instant replay expanded, fine. I agree with that. But you can’t change the result of this game because “it’s not hurting anyone”. There are several examples of obvious, bad calls like this impacting the outcome of a game.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Statute of limitations?

Could MLB get away with imposing a timeframe in which a challenge is issued – 24 hours, for example?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why not just expand replay?

That way the calls are corrected on the spot. You wouldn’t have to worry about re-scheduling games and Jay Mariotti blowing a head gasket because of the result of a game being delayed 24 hours because MLB had to look at a challenge.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I meant in terms of your 2007 Wild Card example

In other words, MLB overruling what happened last night but letting the results of the Rockies-Padres game stand because, let’s face it, that was three years ago.

So my suggestion is something like this – heretofore, starting 6/3/10, if MLB doesn’t review and issue a statement 24 hours after a controversial game-ending play, then whatever the on-the-field ruling stands. Sorry, Padres and Cards, tough luck.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem here is

the 24 hour timeframe wasn’t available to the Cards and Padres at the time of their bad calls. Plus, you’re making an interesting regular season game have a different set of rules than a playoff game.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

so other teams in the future should get screwed out of a call

because of what happened in the past?

Self-Proclaimed President of the Castro Boobird Face Kicking Club
The Chicago Blackhawks: The only Chicago team worth caring about.

by jesus christos on Jun 3, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

there's the rub

Do you let teams in the past get screwed via a rule change, or do you allow future teams to get screwed via no rule change?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're correcting things going forward

You can’t change the past. You can prevent it from happening again.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right.

The teams in the past were already screwed. Too late now. Learn from mistakes and don’t let it happen again.

"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes

by katie casey on Jun 3, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm for expanded replay

Get the call right on the field. So future teams wouldn’t be screwed.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

That never happens.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

So we should go back and correct all bad calls?

Rules change, but only for events in the future. We don’t go back and change events in the past because the new rules may impact the the results of completed competitions.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

A better way of presenting my thought

How far back in the past is the “past”? Is 18 hours ago the past the way that three years or 25 years ago is the past?

I don’t mean to get into semantics – just trying to figure out a way that Galarraga can get his perfect game by virtue of a special ruling without members of the 2007 Padres taking the league office to court.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

If in your mind, he got a perfect game

then he got one. Do you need it be official? At this point, any announcement saying he got one would be anti-climactic. Now I don’t think an ex-player would take the league to court because they changed the result would happen. Any court would immediately say that they are MLB’s rules, not laws of the land. It might be controversial if he got it and fans of the Cards, Padres, or similarly screwed teams would be, justifiably in my mind, upset.

I’m just not a fan of doing this because other, more difficult questions, are raised, such as other games where a bad call directly impacted the result of a game. Even if the result was changed, it won’t impact me much. I would disagree with it, but accept it.

Sorry if this response doesn’t answer your question.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

So it's anti-climactic

It still awards Gallaraga his rightful place in history. One that he earned, I might add.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Explain myself better

I guess I’m philisophically opposed to this sort of thing. Do you think this solution should also happen in a playoff game where a bad call directly impacts the result such as this? Let’s say a Padres-Rockies situation occurs this year in the playoffs and replay has not been expanded. Should the game be replayed the next day after the 24 hour timeframe?

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're doing great, no worries

This is the kind of philosophical dimension to baseball that appeals to me and makes it my favorite sport.

I said in a different thread last night that in my mind Galarraga got a perfect game. I know what I saw, and no ruling on the field or by the commissioner or omission in the official records will make me think otherwise.

To the issue of a Padres-Rockies happening this postseason, if the call is overruled and the winning run is out, do what they did for the Pine Tar Game. Pick up play from that point. The key here is to issue a verdict in a reasonably quick amount of time, whether it doesn’t go beyond 24 hours or 12 hours or 10 minutes.

One of more compelling points you brought up so far is the different set of rules for an interesting regular season game and for the postseason. My initial reaction was, “Wow, Jim made a great point and I can’t dispute that”. But two minutes ago I thought, “Well, they have two sets of rules between the leagues with the DH”.

But again, what it all comes down to is what you said earlier – in my mind, Armando Galarraga pitched a perfect game.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, I understand your point

With regards to the Pine Tar game, I guess I see a difference between an obvious judgmental error and a question of whether a bat conformed to the rules. Brett’s bat either conformed to the rules or didn’t. There isn’t any subjectivity to it. So, to me, there is a difference.

With regards to the rules point I made, I guess I intended to say that you shouldn’t retroactively change the rules for what is an interesting regular season game, but not retroactively change the rules for a post season game. In all the cases, including the perfect game, a rule allowing a call to be reviewed many hours after the fact to occur was not on the books. And if you allow it once, you are allowing other issues, that while controversial, are dead.

It seems the people who want the result changed are far more passionate in their opinion than those that are against it. If the result is changed, I just hope it doesn’t cause more issues.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I fully admit guilt

I come from generations of Detroit Tigers fans, so I’d love to see the results changes. But if not, I understand why and what will count is what’s in my heart.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dr. Ealy and Mr. Worf ;-)

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

The call in that game was the first batter in the 9th. Ironically, if Jack Clark makes the catch on Balbonis’ foul pop-up, the Cards win anyway. Kinda like Alex Gonzo booting the DP ball in 2003. My point being the calls may have been bad, but the outcome was still in the hands of the players afterward. This game was the last out, and events that happened after this would be moot if the call was correct.

"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields

by KedzieKid on Jun 3, 2010 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Meh...I'll put a lot more stock in reports of possible action they discuss.

The firestorm in the media made this meeting inevitable. That alone doesn’t tell me anything.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

He even got the plays

that typically go with a game like this. The catch in LCF, and the carom off his leg to the SS.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Too soon?

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

icanhazperfectgame.com

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

...

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

...


"A waist is a terrible thing to mind." - Terry 'Fat Tub of Goo' Forster

by eths on Jun 3, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

nice.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW

anyone hear that Griffey retired? He picked the wrong day to do that ,huh.?

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Three perfect games in three weeks?

For a total of 21 in the history of baseball?

WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY PUTTING IN THESE BASEBALLS? No wonder Aramis can’t hit, they filled them full of dog doo, and he’s allergic.

"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk

by vonde6 on Jun 3, 2010 10:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Two Comments.

1. While we don’t pay much attention to soccer/football here in the U.S., it’s worth noting that France will be playing in the World Cup this year thanks to a blown call. IIRC, no action has been taken for that “major sport.”

2. Let’s assume Al’s replay scheme is adopted, and the next perfect game call comes down to a ball and strike decision al a Milt Pappas. Unlike 1972, the reply is perfectly clear — the pitch was a strike. Does anyone here believe there’d be less controversy than today.

by CHS on Jun 3, 2010 10:47 AM CDT reply actions  

I think

there would still be controversy, but that is a judgement call, and the call at first is clear. That is like saying in NFL the holding or pass interference calls are judgement calls. If the ball is ruled out or a dropped catch or ball crossing the plane, than the correct call is at least looked at. If inconclusive, than it stays as called.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pappas got hosed, too

I was surprised noone on TV mentioned Pappas. That was a terrible call. But there is no way MLB will, or should, start reviews of balls and strikes, even with today’s technology.

Lets Play Two Today

by RTGrules on Jun 3, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tim K

on ESPN brought that up this am, but did admit that they were different because one was balls/strikes and the other is a play.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are

a ton of bad ball/strike calls, that is the pitchers and hitters jobs to adjust to the umps “zone”. and the only time that bothers me is when it is inconsistent between the 2 teams. I dont know what the zone was like in the game w Pappas, all I know is what I hear, which is that it wasn;t a strike.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pappas

And, unlike Joyce, the umpire in the Pappas case (Froemming) was a complete jerk about the entire thing and gave the impression that he had personally tried to keep Pappas from getting the perfecto. Pappas is still steaming 38 years later.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lots of bad calls in soccer

From England’s third goal in the 1966 World Cup final to Maradona’s “Hand of God” goal.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great to hear Sportmanship is still alive

Joyce is will working behind the plate at the DET game today. And Galarraga is presenting him the Tiger’s lineup card.

"They come to see me strike out, hit a home run, or run into a fence. I try to accommodate them at least one way every game." - Gorman Thomas

by RiskyBusiness on Jun 3, 2010 10:58 AM CDT reply actions  

Galarraga has handled this very well

As have Joyce and Leyland. All class guys. Galarraga was gracious even in the heat of battle last nite.

Lets Play Two Today

by RTGrules on Jun 3, 2010 11:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Very impressive sportsmanship on all sides

they’ll make you laugh (at them), they’ll make you cry (tears of desperation)

by Emelie on Jun 3, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm even more sorry I said a bunch of nasty stuff about Jim Joyce

and not just dropping an MF bomb here on BCB.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

it was understandable, EE -- quite an emotional moment for all

they’ll make you laugh (at them), they’ll make you cry (tears of desperation)

by Emelie on Jun 3, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Galarraga's "perfect game" regardless of the last out...

seems to be an incredibly lucky/rare one. Only 3 strikeouts? How does a pitcher throw 83 pitches and record 27 outs? I wonder how many ground balls there were in this game, because 24/27 outs handled entirely by the defense is huge.

by RichieAllenIn1966 on Jun 3, 2010 11:01 AM CDT reply actions  

And, the game was completed in 1:44.

That, IIRC, is only the third game in the last 15 years that’s been that quick.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

1:44 and 88 pitches

He threw 88 pitches, according to cnnsi, but maybe that’s wrong.

After 1:44 and 88 pitches, we’d be in the 4th inning of a Zambrano start.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

LMAO

Sad, but true.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

And I heard 83 pitches.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tells you something about the Indian attack.

Right now with my Cubs having so much trouble…makes me feel better lol.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Quick games

Buehrle pitched a game in 1:39 in 2005. A 2-1 win over Seattle.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was one of the three I was thinking of.

Jon Lieber’s one-hitter against the Reds on May 24, 2001 took 1:48.

However, there was a nearly two-hour rain delay during that game, so it didn’t really end in one hour and 48 minutes.

Kerry Wood’s one-hitter against the Brewers the next day, May 25, 2001, took 1:57. I believe that is the last game at Wrigley Field that finished in under two hours.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

88

MLB.com box also says 88. But yes – it’s 83 if it’s just for the 27 outs that would have been recorded were it not for the bad call.

I think the last pitcher to throw that few in a CG might have been Aaron Cook a couple years ago. And I know Greg Maddux came in under 80 in a game he threw for Atlanta in the late 90s – might have been against the Cubs.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maddux

July 22, 1997: Greg Maddux beats the Cubs 4-1 at Wrigley, throwing 76 pitches in the CG. He faced 31 batters, so that’s about 2.4 pitches per batter. Game time was 2:07.

I remember listening to this one on the radio, and thinking Maddux was at the height of his powers.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

addendum

Although Maddux gets lots of credit, the Cubs lineup that day was not too potent, and included such warm bodies as Dave Clark, Tyler Houston, Scott Servais, an aging Ryne Sandberg and Doug Glanville.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cook - last pitcher under 80

July 1, 2008 – in a 4-0 shutout of the Padres in Colorado, Cook threw 79 pitches. Game time was 1:58.

I remembered this one because I had Cook on my fantasy team.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Boxscore from the 1997 Maddux game

The Cubs actually had five hits and a run, but no walks. The most pitches any Cub hitter saw that day was five — Mark Grace ran a count to 2-2 before flying out. He was the ONLY Cub hitter in that game to see more than four pitches. 11 Cub hitters saw only ONE pitch in that game.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maddux

When he was on, the best thing to do was just swing at the first good pitch you saw, because you weren’t going to see anything bad. The Cubs players must have known that.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is more accurate than you know

Brian McRae who was on the team gave a funny back story on this game. Before the game the Cub players agreed that since everyone knew Maddux ALWAYS threw first pitch strikes , they would in fact
all swing at the first pitch. They actually thought this was a good strategy. You can see the result in the box score.

It’s too bad that the current Cub lineup and manager think this is a good idea even when the pitcher has an ERA over 6.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim

by Doggie Stalker on Jun 3, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's a unique thought

Does this result in all the unofficial perfect games (Harvey Haddix, Babe Ruth) being re-acknowledged and legitimized, with Galarraga’s game included?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Bambino fail

He didn’t toss an unoffical perfecto – he got tossed after walking the first batter and the reliever retired the next 27 in a row.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Harvey Haddix gave up a hit, ergo he did not throw a no-hitter, and it was not a perfect game.

I never understood the controversy on that one. Even though after nine innings, he had not allowed a single runner to reach base, it wasn’t a “perfect game” because (unfortunately for him) the game wasn’t over yet.

Having said that, I fervently believe the Harvey Haddix game is the greatest pitched game in MLB history. 12 innings of perfect baseball against the likes of Aaron, Adcock, Mathews, Crandall… Oh yeah, and some guy named Andy Pafko. ;-)

Right behind that in my personal rankings is Kerry Wood’s 20K game. Certainly the most impressive pitching performance I’ve ever seen. Biggio, Bagwell, Bell and Alou weren’t too shabby either. Unbelievable total domination.

Neither one of them are “perfect games” but they are arguably two of the best pitching performances ever.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed, esp. about Kerry's 20K game

But I always wondered: if Kevin Orie makes that play and retires Ricky Gutierrez, would that have been a perfect game? I don’t think Wood walked anyone that day – did he hit a batter, or was there an error?

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wood faced 29 batters - 1 hit, 0 errors, 0 walks, 1 HBP

the HBP was Biggio. Go figure… ;-)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, that's a LOT closer to a perfect game than I thought it was!

Thanks Ballhawk.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Where's this one rank?

May 2, 1917

Pretty short box score there…

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jeez, kid - speak English much?

*Where does this one rank?

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Jun 3, 2010 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's ridiculous

to penalize a pitcher because his hitters couldn’t hit. To my mind, if somebody pitches nine innings without giving up a hit it’s a no hitter. Whether it’s Hippo Vaughn or Harvey Haddix. I agree that Haddix’ game is the best pitched game in major league history.

Bud Lite has got to overturn that call. More for the sake of Joyce, who seems to be a standup guy, that Gallaraga.

by Clark Addison on Jun 3, 2010 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta agree with the Hawk on this one

Kerry Wood’s game was the most impressive I’ve ever actually watched start to finish. I’ve managed to catch pieces of perfect games, but never first pitch to last out.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Wood game was the best pitched game I have ever seen in person.

And arguably, the most dominant pitched game in MLB history. Only Sandy Koufax’s perfect game comes close.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haddix's game has to be in the conversation, I would think,

although Wood’s game stands out because, unlike Haddix, Wood won the game.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Jun 3, 2010 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haddix game?

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Preparing to hike to the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire on Saturday....

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jun 3, 2010 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Haddix#Near_perfect_game

Self-Proclaimed President of the Castro Boobird Face Kicking Club
The Chicago Blackhawks: The only Chicago team worth caring about.

by jesus christos on Jun 3, 2010 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL, OT?

I read this morning that they haven’t decided whether to start Silva or Z tomorrow. I say leave Silva where he is, he’s earned that.

by kanderber on Jun 3, 2010 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Preparing to hike to the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire on Saturday....

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jun 3, 2010 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Good one. No more Cubs discussions here. Too depressing.

"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk

by vonde6 on Jun 3, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

those who argue that replay would ruin the flow of the game

should be forced to watch the replay of Joyce’s blown call for 48 straight hours with no bathroom breaks.

The most important thing is to get the call right, and replay would have corrected that horrible mistake.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 3, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

ha ha ha ha

Believe or Leave ~Cubswynn 9/9/2008

by slcathena on Jun 3, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting ?

What if the runner was safe and had been called out. Would we be calling for him to have the perfecto taken away? I wouldnt, but yet I think that this should be overturned. Hypocrite?
Yes i know, What if.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 11:24 AM CDT reply actions  

Where the f--- is Selig?

We’re at 12:30 p.m. EST and Selig has yet to be heard from.

Any more questions on why this sport is pathetic?

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Being a day game

in Detroit, that crowd would go nuts if they announced an overrule during the game.

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Jun 3, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

That might be the right way to do it.

It would give the fans and players the chance to celebrate on the field.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

They should announce it at DET

at the end of the game if they are overturning it.

THAT would be the best possible time.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Jun 3, 2010 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

That'd be really cool.

… assuming the Tigers win the game today, too.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

The longer Bud takes his time

the more it emboldens him into ruling that Jim Joyce’s call stands. It’s harder to correct history the further in the past it is.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Someone wake him up and pull the stake out of his heart!

His sport needs him!

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Which is why calls for Bud to "look in the mirror" are futile

He has no reflection.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Couple of other random neural blasts

Just read Joe Posnanski’s piece. Gallaraga was once part of a trade involving Soriano. He was the in the Nats organization and was sent to Texas. He lasted one start before being shipped to Detroit.

Also, Jim Joyce is the only other person I’ve seen with the Hulk Hogan mustache. That thing is magnificent.

There is no such thing as an ugly female breast

by Worf on Jun 3, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Posnanski

That’s a great column. Best one I’ve read on this so far.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep.

Separated at birth?

Jim Joyce & Goose Gossage

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

and Paul Teutul Sr (American Chopper)

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Random although somewhat related thought...

In hockey game last night, play continued on after the “no goal” call. Although NHL does have replay for disputed goal calls, evidently they wait until the next stoppage of play before they review. Given the nature of the game, that’s totally understandable.

Play went on quite a bit before the next whistle, at which point they had the review, determined it was a goal (rightly so) and then started the game back up with a center ice faceoff – after putting the time played since the goal back on the clock. Again, rightly so.

My question is… what if the Hawks had scored during that “waiting for the next whistle so we can review” period of time? Logic dictates that the goal would have had to come off the books since it “never happened”, but man oh man, can you imagine the chaos and pandemonium? Quenneville’s mustache would have fallen off – or at the least he would’ve popped a vein…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 12:43 PM CDT reply actions  

It happened in 1994 Cup Finals, I believe

Vancouver “scored” a goal with about 1:30 left. Since the referee didn’t see, he waved play-on. The Rangers went on to score about a minute later. They ended up replaying the Canucks, decided it should stand, and took away the Rangers goal.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Game 6 of the Finals.

Geoff Courtnall “scored” to make it “4-1”, but the Rangers scored (forget who) to make it 3-2. Replays showed Courtnall scored and the Canucks won 4-1.

by JimAnchower on Jun 3, 2010 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

So What.

He blew the call. No perfect game. Yes it sucks. But who said life was fair?

No way they should reverse the call.

PS It was also a crock that the Canadian Pairs figure skaters were given a gold medal back in the 2002 Olympics.

by sanshokubento on Jun 3, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

I bet if Oprah was Commissioner she'd reverse the call!

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

and you get a free car

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Assuming you posted that due to Oprah's penchant for giving out cars and other lavish gifts on occasion

but I think I read somewhere that Gallaraga did get a free car – GM gave him a convertible.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

The car thing never occurred to me

Cool that Galarraga got a convertible!

Actually I was just working off Sanshokubento’s “who said life was fair” comment. After I read it I was immediately Immediately hit with an image of Oprah – a self-proclaimed bastion of fairness and (nauseating) practicioner of self-esteem and do-goodness.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

the previous

all though it was cool he got a free car…then again – why is it that rich people get all the free stuff?

Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119

by hansman1982 on Jun 3, 2010 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pappas

As I said – Pappas is still steaming, and Froemming is still defensive 38 years later. Below is an excerpt from Chicagobreakingsports.com published today:

Pappas said he was dismayed at the initial reaction of Froemming, compared to the response from Joyce Wednesday night.

“(Froemming) just passed it off, then years later, he makes the remark: ‘Well, I didn’t know he had a perfect game,’” said Pappas. “What are you talking about, dummy? Where’s your head? He had no idea that nobody had reached first base? And now he’s saying he had no idea that a perfect game was going on? This guy is a complete idiot.”

Reached by the New York Times Wednesday night, Froemming stood by his call.

“The pitch was outside,” Froemming said. “I didn’t miss the pitch; Pappas missed the pitch. You can look at the tape. Pappas, the next day, said, ‘I know the pitch was outside, but you could have given it to me.’ That pitch has gotten better over the years. That pitch is right down the middle now.”

Pappas feels instant replay would have solved the problem Wednesday night for Galarraga.

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 1:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I support Pappas in this, but

that these two still are arguing about it almost 40 years later is pretty pathetic.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Jun 3, 2010 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thank God you're NOT Bruce Froemming

"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk

by vonde6 on Jun 3, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Given his history,

I’m proud to say I’m not him. :)

by Not Bruce Froemming on Jun 3, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

And by the way,

Thanks for making that distinction. :)

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Preparing to hike to the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire on Saturday....

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jun 3, 2010 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Funny side note

There’s an ad during Brewers games on the radio in which Bruce Froemming shills for an assisted-living facility. Perfect.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Jun 3, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

HAHAHAHAHA that's rich!!!

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

It’s kind of funny that they’re both still pissed at each other all these years later. Isn’t it time for them to make up?

"They found a delivery in my flaw." - Dan Quisenberry

by danimal15 on Jun 3, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Greeks and Germans can be quite stubborn

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thank God you're NOT Bruce Froemming

"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk

by vonde6 on Jun 3, 2010 2:19 PM CDT reply actions  

classic reply failure

"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk

by vonde6 on Jun 3, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I find some of the arguments being made her absurd

1. To me, this call is undoubtedly the biggest missed call of the generation. Yes, the stakes were arguably higher with the World Series on the line. HOWEVER, the Cardinals had every chance to overcome the blown call and still win the World Series. Furthermore, the World Series is played every single year. There is a champion every season and the Cardinals have won the world series since, had opportunities to still win the 85 series, and will undoubtedly (unfortunately) have opportunities to win those in the future. Gallaraga did not have the opportunity to overcome the blown call, though he did his best by retiring the next hitter. At that point, the no-hitter and the perfect game were gone. There has only been 20 in the history of the game and I will bet every single cent that I have that he will NEVER get that opportunity again. In a blink, it was all gone. It also was unlike Pappas because the call is not a subjective, arguable decision. He was out. As the announcer said “how is he safe?”

2. I am extremely disappointed that Selig decided not to reverse the call. Yes it would be odd to announce it at a press conference. Yes the moment is gone and the celebration on the field in front of the fans spontaneously is gone. Yes it will be controversial. But, it is the RIGHT thing to do. Gallaraga deserves it and it would have absolutely no effect on baseball as a whole. The Tigers still won the game! It would take away a hit from the runner and a hit from Gallaraga’s whip. THATS IT. The standings don’t change, no teams are effected. Everything remains the same. Not a single person on earth thinks that guy is safe. Why not just make it right? Let him have his name in the history books and at least somewhat of a moment in the sun. CAN SOMEONE HONESTLY ARGUE THAT HE DOESN’T DESERVE IT???

Obviously you can go with the Pandora’s box argument but come on. This is instant. Within 24 hours. You don’t go back and look at all the video of all the games. You just look at this one, obviously and admittedly blown call and say, no, not this time. It won’t change anything at all besides giving someone his due. Then implement replay and mirror the NFL rules (so even if the challenges are gone, the umpires can use discretion on calls like this) and never have to worry about it again.

End rant.

by KButler on Jun 3, 2010 2:23 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree with you on all your points here.

I’m also glad you see that it could cause problems in the future. I think that people here who just blindly say it is the right thing to do (and it certainly is) aren’t thinking at all of the problems that can come from it. I think the call should be reversed, now, and Selig should figure out how exactly any future problems or bad calls should be handled in the future after overturning the call.

"Everything has an end, except a sausage, which has two."

by Sandberg's evil twin on Jun 3, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Some interesting things mentioned in the ESPN article about Bud's decision

Tigers general manager Dave Dombrowski said the team will not ask MLB to overturn the call. St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa says the call should be overturned.

Thursday, a visibly upset Joyce wiped away tears as he took the field for the Tigers’ series finale against the Cleveland Indians. He and Galarraga met at home plate as the pitcher presented the umpire with the Tigers’ lineup card. Joyce shook hands with Galarraga and patted him on the shoulder.

Leyland said MLB gave Joyce the option to not work Thursday’s game, but Joyce chose to stick with his job behind the plate.

I'll go to my grave believing Armando Galarraga tossed the 21st perfect game in MLB history.

by EalyEagle on Jun 3, 2010 2:35 PM CDT reply actions  

More fodder to chew on...

One of the arguments for overturning the call is that this was the last out of the game and whatever happened afterwards wouldn’t count. W.r.t. the stats, box score, etc., the next at-bat (Crowe’s I think) i.e. the “28th out”, never happened.

That’s an easy enough position to take because it was just only one more batter. He made an out and game was over – Tigers still won.

But what if that blown call was the start of an Indians’ rally? They were only down 3-0. With Donald on 1st and the top of the order coming up, it’s not out of the realm of possibility that they could score at least 3 runs to tie it up – yes, even for the Indians. Bigger 2 out rallies have happened before.

So let’s say they do tie it up, goes into extra innings, and at that point either team could win. And then the next day (today), Bud wakes up from his coma and overturns the call, Gallaraga gets his perfect game and Tigers win.

Logically, all those extra at-bats and stats would have to come off the books, right? Could be several innings worth. So I guess my question is… Does the amount of “undoing” that would have to happen influence the impact of the decision? IOW, it’s easy enough when you’re just talking about one at-bat. But several innings worth?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 3, 2010 3:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes, I think it does matter, although...

… quite a bit of actual play was overturned in the Pine Tar Game.

Overturning two at-bats, which would not have an impact on the final score, doesn’t seem to be that much of a big deal to me.

"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra

by Al Yellon on Jun 3, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is there such a thing as

a retroactive scorer’s decison? They could take that hit away and give an Error to someone.

He’d at least get credit for a no-hitter then, which makes me feel better.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 3, 2010 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

There is. I think the official scorer has a 24 hour window after a game to make any changes.

Usually involves situations where it was a really hard hit ball that scorer initially called an error. Then maybe after reviewing replay and/or talking to the player, coaches, broadcasters, etc., the scorer will reconsider and change to a hit.

Probably happens more often than you hear about but certainly not enough where it becomes an abuse. I get the distinct impression that official scorers around the league take their jobs seriously and pride themselves on not being “homers”.

And specific to this situation, I read where the official scorer for the Tigers did review the video several times from several angles, trying to see if perhaps Gallaraga had bobbled the ball in his glove so he could be charged with an error. But scorer said it was a bang bang play – everything was clean and clear cut. Once he saw everything, he didn’t think twice about not changing it.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Jun 4, 2010 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah

Thanks, BH.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 4, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure about the 24 hour window

back in 2006 the Cubs appealed to change a hit to an error on Cedeno. The error
( and it was an error) lead to a few runs being scored and when it was changed weeks if not months later, Maddux who was the pitcher had his ERA go down. This was the game in which he attacked the Gatorade dispenser.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either Jim

by Doggie Stalker on Jun 4, 2010 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see why the play cant be called an error on Cabrera's throw

in reality, there was no error, in that the Tigers successfully completed the play, and did nothing wrong. But Joyce did rule that Galarraga’s foot was not on the base. Then why not say that Cabrera’s throw caused AG to miss the base? I realize this sounds absurd-given that the throw was fine, but no less absurd than calling him safe.

by holy mackeral on Jun 4, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

because it would be a lie

there was nothing wrong with the throw, the ump blew the call, let it go.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 4, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just for everyone calling for Joyce's head

Please watch SportsCenter tonight (specifically the Tigers highlight, obviously).

Gallaraga and Joyce have handled this in the classiest way possible. It was a beautiful moment.

Things work out best for those that make the best out of the way things work out - Coach Wooden

by Allie on Jun 4, 2010 12:40 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  968 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima