Questions: Gorzelanny, Soriano, Marshall
Hello; as always, thank you in advance for your wisdom.
1. Why is it that everyone seems to consider Gorzelanny "trade bait"? There is constant discussion of needing to shore up the bullpen and using him as a trade piece.
Lilly probably won't be back next year, and Zambrano has imploded. Gorzelanny has been consistent, is cheap, is under team control and is young. I would think he would be the first person the Cubs would want to keep.
Is it that his "stuff" is not good and everyone thinks he is simply getting lucky? He has looked pretty solid to me when I've seen him.
2. There has been several mentions of a player named Kila Ka'aihu who plays for the Royals and how we should go after him. Al Yellon has mentioned this on multiple occasions.
If he has so much potential, wouldn't the Royals just hold on to him. That's another team with no chance of winning now, and I would think that he is the very type of player that they would NOT want to trade. Is there something I am missing? Is that a joke?
3. Why is Marshall not being given a chance to start, at least spot start on occasion? He has looked great although in a relief role. Is he going to be given the chance to start next year if enough baggage can be traded?
I know he is "valuable" in the pen, but shouldn't he be given a chance to start at this point, especially with Cashner up to take his spot in the pen for now? The season is all but lost now anyway; we may as well start to see what type of pitching we have for next year.
4. There was a recent thread which noted concluded that, although Soriano's contract is excessive, that he is still for the most part worth (or close to worth) his salary.
If that is the case, why is his contract considered "immovable"? If a contract is reasonable (or even close to reasonable), a trade should be possible since the player is being paid close to market value, especially when a team has needs for such a player.
Several people have asked questions before about potential trades for Soriano, [including for the slumping Aaron Rowand (who has a similar contract)], and were berated for being absolutely insane and that such a trade would be a "pipe dream". This conclusion would then mean that Soriano's contract would be considered terrible, which is why no other team would ever take it despite whether they needed a player like him or not.
I am not sure how one can conclude that his contract is reasonable or worthwhile, or anything other than horrible, and then turn around and say by the same token that he is untradeable.
Thanks again for all of your input.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
71 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Marshall has looked best and most consistent
Coming out of the pen. He’s an ok starter, but he is a pretty good lefty from the pen. Much better ERA.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Jul 14, 2010 3:44 PM CDT reply actions
Gorz is trade bait b/c of all the reasons you listed for keeping him, imo
Teams would love a consistent, cheap, young starter. I’d love for him to stick around, but if throwing him in a deal could help us unload a bad contract I’d be all for it.
Kila Ka'aihue
is my choice for the next Cubs first baseman. Ideally, you would be able to move Lee and bring in Kila for the last two months of the season, giving him a chance to show if the AAA numbers translate at all.
To answer your question why the Royals would move him, that’s part of the reason I think we should pursue him. They obviously don’t seem to believe in him. He was kind of a non-prospect who went nuts two years ago hitting 37 home runs between AA and AAA. Instead of giving him a shot to play first base or DH in ‘09, the Royals went out and acquired Mike Jacobs, paying him a lot of money when, at worst, Kila could have given the same production for the league minimum. Kila’s power dropped off some in ‘09, but his plate discipline remained very strong (104 BB to 67 Ks). This winter, the Royals again signed a bunch of washed up veteran free agents who further blocked Kila’s shot at the MLB team, even though he had an impressive spring training. Finally, with Billy Butler ahead and 1B prospect Eric Hosmer tearing up the minors behind him, Kila doesn’t appear to be in the Royal’s long term plans.
Kila has been dominant so far this year in AAA: .306/.463/584, 18 HR, 77 BB, 55 Ks. His time is obviously now or never. Understanding that the Royals are pretty much stuck with Guillen at DH (who they are trying to move), they just haven’t made any efforts to give Kila a shot. In a chat on MLBTR.com today, Tim Dierkes had this to say:
“I don’t think Moore cares too much about getting Kila to the Majors. He’s had chances to do so. I don’t see Guillen as anyone’s first choice [in a trade]. "
All of this means there is a chance he can be obtained for a reasonable price, given the possible upside. I don’t know what the price would be, or how we match up with the Royals in terms of a prospect swap, but given Moore’s track records in trades, Hendry should see just how cheap the price might be.
by Bradsbeard on Jul 14, 2010 3:54 PM CDT reply actions 5 recs
DINGDINGDING!
Winner. I’m all in favor of this.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
That would be fine - nothing wrong with taking advantage of a bad GM to get a cheap player
And given the guys the Royals signed in the offseason, Moore has 0 ability in talent evaluation. They were “cheap” in MLB terms, but in worth terms the Royals FA class of 2010 be using the phrase “Do you want fries with that” on the job.
I'm in KC. This is all correct.
Up until last year Kila seemed primed to be given a shot, but Dayton Moore and his decisions haven’t made a lot of sense. Poor Royals.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
by dtpollitt on Jul 14, 2010 4:31 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
And even if he were a great GM
Having Butler ahead and Hosmer behind means Kila should still be leveraged in a trade. His defense is apparently poor, but I doubt it’s as bad as Adam Dunn at first. He may have a short peak of only a few good years when he can capably handle the position, but that’s enough.
The bigger question is why, if Kila is available, would Moore trade him to the Cubs rather than another team. I’d guess it comes down to what Hendry would part with. Personally, I’d wave Josh Vitters at KC and see if they blink. We would certainly seem to have enough pitching to offer: maybe a couple guys like Atkins and Archer.
By the way, I’d be just as happy acquiring Alex Gordon and moving Aramis to first.
Somebody take Aramis' bat off the restricted list, please.
I'm guessing the Royals would want young pitching, not Vitters.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
debatable
Royals have a lot of good minor league arms. Could always use more, but I could also see them demand up the middle talent, which is where they are a bit thin. Of course, they’d likely ask for Hak-ju Lee, which I would say no to. I’m not certain if they would accept guys like LeMahieu or Flaherty.
I wouldn't give Lee, either.
But every team could use good young pitching.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I dunno what to think about Alex Gordon.
He’s been shafted of sorts by KC, injured last year, and is doing fairly well at AAA Omaha right now. That’s one player I can’t quite put my finger on.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Seems to me
like they just rushed his development, and he’s never been able to make the necessary adjustments at the MLB level. I think it’s good for him to get significant time at AAA, and I hope that when he does resurface he has himself straightened out. It does seem like he may need to change organizations to really succeed though.
I agree with that last statement.
I mean, the guy’s had two full seasons at the major league level, plus another half last year and couple this year. How much is enough? Granted, last year was small, and this year has been even smaller. The Royals treat him like a teenage boy in bed with a Perfect 10 model: They don’t know what the hell to do. He’s played first, short, third, outfield, you name it. I agree the guy needs to be shipped elsewhere, but I don’t know what kind of sample size I’d give him before I’d say, “I’ve seen enough.”
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
no way I offer Archer
in a deal for Kila. I’d rather keep the quality young SP prospect.
Archer's still probably two years from the major leagues and is no lock.
I’d consider this.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I wouldn't
I wouldn’t give up quality young pitching unless it’s for a high probability that said prospect will become a solid starting first baseman. Archer may very well bust, but his effort in A+ this year saw him improve the 3 areas that he needed to – control, consistency on breaking ball, and the changeup. I just think Archer’s value is higher than Kila. A potential 2/3 starter … those prospects are very valuable in trades.
I wouldn’t give up quality young pitching unless it’s for a high probability that said prospect will become a solid starting first baseman.
Which, IMO, is exactly what you’d be doing here. Archer has upside, yes — but it’s two or three years away and no guarantee.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I know what you are saying
As I’ve said before, I think Kila is getting a tad overrated here. I don’t think he’s a 1st tier starting 1st baseman. My guess is that he might be a decent 2nd tier starting 1st baseman, if he does make it as a starting first baseman. Considering that one can find solid 2nd tier starting first baseman relatively easily, I’d rather not give up a quality starting pitching prospect. Put it another way – I think Archer’s value surpasses Kila’s right now by quite a bit and making that swap is not something I would do one for one. If they offered to throw something else in there, perhaps.
Personally, while a lot of people won’t like it, I think we’re going to see the Cubs try to put Colvin or Soriano at first (probably Colvin), perhaps shift Marlon to RF, and try to find a CF that might be able to lead off.
Colvin or Soriano at first
What is the timeframe if the Cubs do move Colvin or Soriano to first? For one, we’d have to move DLee. He is a free agent after this year, and I don’t see any trades for him during this season. I would think that if one of the guys mentioned moves to first it would be after the season, or in September if the team is eliminated by then.
after the season
If they ponder either Tyler or Alfonso to 1st, it’d probably be after the season. Tyler has played some first in college before, so my guess is that, between the two, Tyler might be more likely.
I’m not saying this is the only plan, or that it’s even the best plan, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was one of the plans they are considering. They need to find a top of the order bat, and they need to see how real Colvin’s bat is. This way, they wouldn’t have to go on the market and spend for a big time 1st base bat.
They could go searching for a top of the order 2nd baseman, keep Colvin in the OF (RF) and Byrd in CF, and add a 1st baseman as well. There are other options.
Soriano at first base would be a complete and utter disaster.
Don’t even think that.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
by Al Yellon on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
rec'd
"Fasten those seatbelts!"-Pat Hughes
by katie casey on Jul 15, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed, if he does not take it seriously
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Doesn't have anything to do with taking it seriously.
He’ll be 35 next year and isn’t good defensively anywhere he plays. Putting him at 1B would be a disaster.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I'm not nearly as sold
as some people that he would be a complete and utter disaster. There’s nothing to indicate that at the moment, unless you have somehow created a mechanism through which we can translate a person’s ability in the OF to 1st with a degree of certainty. I’d make the argument that, following Soriano ever since he was a minor leaguer, that he’s a guy that is better going off quick reaction than diagnosing a play (either at 2nd or in the OF). Watch some of his stuff from the minors. Doesn’t mean that he’d be good at first, but I think he would probably be passable/decent, better than “complete and utter disaster”.
All that said, while I am fairly certain that the Cubs are pondering him at first, I do think that between Tyler and Alfonso, that they would put Tyler at 1st, considering his past experience there. That said, tis only one of the possibilities.
The two things a good major league 1B needs are...
… good hands and good footwork. Soriano has neither. He is least harmful in left field. Leave him there. Balls would be flying into dugouts often with him at 1B.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
moving Colvin to
first for a year would also allow the Cubs to wait on one of the Gonzalez/Fielder/Pujols class to man first after the 2011 season, and move Colvin back into right just as Fukudome is leaving.
DEJESUS!!!
Bottom line
there is merit to the idea of Colvin playing 1B, I would much rather Colvin play 1B than Soriano, even though I have defended that idea too.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jul 16, 2010 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree with you
The thing with Archer is that even if he doesn’t meet his full potential he is a useful piece. With a 1B prospect it is boom or bust. Either he is a great hitter and a legitimate starting 1B or his bat isn’t good enough to start at 1B and there is nowhere else on the diamond to move him. 1B is probably the most all-or-nothing position on the diamond.
He has been great in AAA
this year, but prior to that he had a great walk rate, but his contact rate didn’t look like it would translate well to the big leagues. IIRC his minor league batting average was around .260. That strikes me as a guy that would have trouble sustaining success at the big league level. He may be patient, but if he’s only getting hits at a .260 clip, it makes me think that big league pitchers won’t have too much difficultly getting him out without walking him. Kind of like Hee Seop Choi—a very patient hitter with a great eye, but had too many holes in his swing to succeed at the MLB level. Anyways, that’s my opinion of him based on 5 minutes of analysis 2 months ago.
DEJESUS!!!
We can send them our AAA Home Run King.
Jason Dubois. hehe
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
I haven't been around much the past few days ...
but I think the trade Gorzo talk has petered out. Am I wrong?
And Marshall has looked far better as a reliever than as a starter. If the Cubs didn’t have a lot of good options for the rotation, Marshall might get a spot start or two. But as it is …
The "trade Gorzo" talk died down when Zambrano blew up
No extra starters in the 2011 projections any more…
A couple of answers
I expect the Cubs to keep Gorzo. Unless it would mean the difference in unloading an expensive contract (which I don’t believe) keeping him makes sense.
Soriano is making $18 Mil this year. Based on his production that isn’t too bad especially compared to Lee, Zambrano and Ramirez. The problem is Soriano is also due $18 Mil in 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Whether he can still deliver for the next four years for $72 Mil is the question and why he is unmovable except for another bad contract.
I also like Marshall for the 2011 rotation
And would have him prepare that way for Spring Training. I think he would do at least as well as, well, Wells next year, and is a lefty.
What I hope Hendry is doing right now is talking to everyone about pitching. He would be pushing Zambrano, Lilly, and Silva, but also listening if someone made the right offer for Dempster, Wells, Gorzelanny, Marshall, or even Marmol. Dempster probably isn’t going anywhere, nor is Cashner, but might as well include the others in the conversation.
Somebody take Aramis' bat off the restricted list, please.
We paid Soriano $18 million per year based on his 2006 season stats
and instead we are basically getting a player worth about half that.
Granted his numbers are fairly decent, but nothing worth $18 million per. That’s Albert Pujols territory.
If you think you've seen it all...just wait!
by CubFanSince1970 on Jul 14, 2010 5:12 PM CDT reply actions
"Albert Pujols territory" in the current market is probably closer to $27 million.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
and Albert Pujols as a Free Agent
in 2006 was worth at least that maybe closer to $30 mil a year…
Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119
Yes.
Howard at 25 mill, the rest of the league sides the Mang inferior…his agent better look to end up with 30 mil or he isn’t trying hard.
"The ones who want to achieve and win championships motivate themselves." - Da Coach
by Sandberg's evil twin on Jul 14, 2010 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions
But based on recent years' production, 2xSoriano < 1x Pujols
But even given that I would want to see the Cubs take on the contract Pujols will get.
I do not...
I really hope the Cubs do not go after Pujols…he will be 32 when his first mega-contract season begins…I think I have seen around here some people are saying 6-7 years? too old…I agree with you that Pujols is a helluva lot better deal than Soriano…Cardinals got a helluva steal when they signed him.
Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119
You misunderstood my point
I’m talking about how much Pujols is paid now in comparison to his offensive output.
I believe he is making $15-16 mill per year right now(option for 2011 is $16 million).
Now compare Fonzy’s output/salary this year to Pujols’ and you will see what I am talking about.
If you think you've seen it all...just wait!
by CubFanSince1970 on Jul 14, 2010 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I think we can all agree
that based on recent fa signing that Pujols is grossly underpaid…and per baseball-reference.com he is being paid $14.5 mil this year
Sipping the Kool-Aid since 1982 - Kinda
Currently 34,839 on the Season Ticket Wait List - Expected age of being #0: 119
You're sure right about that.
It’s why the whole nation seems to assume Pujols will take a hometown discount and sign for a very underpaid contract to remain in STL. I don’t believe this myself, but that he did sign an underpaid one before does make it a question mark I suppose. He has had a number of years to watch many other players inferior to him sign for more money, so we will see what happens. I know I’d want him on my team, I think his history has shown he is likely to be healthy over most of his new contract.
"The ones who want to achieve and win championships motivate themselves." - Da Coach
by Sandberg's evil twin on Jul 15, 2010 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I think it is more of the fact of the length of the contract
If Soriano’s contract was 3 or 4 years in length, it wouldn’t be a horrid contract, but it was 8 years (right?)…looking back, there seems to be no reason to give a guy this many years/money hoping he will produce 30-40 HRS until he is 38 years old, it just doesn’t happen often
by HardForharden on Jul 14, 2010 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions
And, had the Cubs won it all in 2007 or 2008..
… it wouldn’t matter so much.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I get that he deserved a lot of money, the Cubs needed him,
But it’s the length of this contract that bothers me so much. Did it take 8 years to get him to sign with us? I mean…I know with Fukudome the same kind of thing was said..we had to give him a long term contract with no idea if he was worth it to sign him, but the length of these coupled with the salary bothered me then as well as now.
"The ones who want to achieve and win championships motivate themselves." - Da Coach
by Sandberg's evil twin on Jul 14, 2010 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions
I still believe we signed Fonzy
with the idea that he would hit .290-.300 and be a 40/40 (HRs/SB) or 40/30 man most of those years.
those were his numbers with Washington in his free agency year. Why wouldn’t we expect at least a couple of years like that from him for that kind of money?
If you think you've seen it all...just wait!
by CubFanSince1970 on Jul 14, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions
There a lot of 1-year wonders in walk years
And just as many teams that regret signing them after that year…..
expecting 40/40 years from a FA
is pretty dumb
by jesus christos on Jul 14, 2010 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions
So...
what would you expect for $18 million a year?
If you think you've seen it all...just wait!
by CubFanSince1970 on Jul 15, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions
On the other hand we should keep Gorz and Marshall
We are getting good to great production from them, based on what they make per year.
If you think you've seen it all...just wait!
by CubFanSince1970 on Jul 14, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions
most people have answered, but I'll answer anyways
1. Why is it that everyone seems to consider Gorzelanny “trade bait”? There is constant discussion of needing to shore up the bullpen and using him as a trade piece.
Lilly probably won’t be back next year, and Zambrano has imploded. Gorzelanny has been consistent, is cheap, is under team control and is young. I would think he would be the first person the Cubs would want to keep.
Is it that his “stuff” is not good and everyone thinks he is simply getting lucky? He has looked pretty solid to me when I’ve seen him.
I don’t think Gorzelanny is trade bait in the sense that the Cubs are/should shop him. I think Gorzelanny is something fans discuss because that’s the type of asset that teams might like in this market (under control, young lefty arm having a solid enough season).
The stuff is fine. It’s not TOR lefty stuff, but it’s your classic mid-end of the rotation lefty stuff, with a fb that is in the low 90’s and 2 decent-solid secondary offerings in the changeup and slider. He’s always had decent-solid stuff – it’s possible that he’s just slowly tapping into it.
Someone said above that if Gorzelanny erases a bad contract, then you make a deal. For the most part, I think I agree with that. If for some reason Gorzelanny can erase a bad deal, then you pull the trigger. It can’t be any bad deal, though. I mean, using Gorzelanny to erase Fukudome is unnecessary, IMO, unless Ricketts dramatically lowers payroll for 2011 to force such a move. It would have to be a contract that extended beyond 2011 for me to deal Gorzelanny to erase a contract, but that’s me.
Otherwise, I tend to think that he’ll be the favorite to be the main lefty SP for next year. Now, you should always listen, and if someone offered you a big surprise of a deal, well, Tom isn’t a guy that you stand steadfast on. But my guess, as of now, is that he is here in 2011 as a member of the starting rotation.
2. There has been several mentions of a player named Kila Ka’aihu who plays for the Royals and how we should go after him. Al Yellon has mentioned this on multiple occasions.
If he has so much potential, wouldn’t the Royals just hold on to him. That’s another team with no chance of winning now, and I would think that he is the very type of player that they would NOT want to trade. Is there something I am missing? Is that a joke?
I think Dayton is a bad GM, but I think people are going a tad overboard on Kila. He does deserve a chance, although I’m not sold that he’s a quality starting 1st baseman in the league. Maybe a decent one. The Royals do have a lot of corner talent, though. As others have noted, there’s Billy Butler in the bigs, and Eric Hosmer is close to ready. Mike Moustakas is at 3rd, although some wonder if he may have to shift to 1st. Alex Gordon has been moved to the OF. Wil Myers may have to go to 1st base eventually.
I’m not completely sold they will move him this offseason. Hosmer probably needs another year in the minors. Now, if they get good up the middle talent, then perhaps. That said, with some good young arms coming up, and contracts clearing up, I could see them give Kila a spin next year.
3. Why is Marshall not being given a chance to start, at least spot start on occasion? He has looked great although in a relief role. Is he going to be given the chance to start next year if enough baggage can be traded?
I know he is “valuable” in the pen, but shouldn’t he be given a chance to start at this point, especially with Cashner up to take his spot in the pen for now? The season is all but lost now anyway; we may as well start to see what type of pitching we have for next year.
I think Lou is comfortable with Marshall in the pen. That said, with Lilly and Gorzelanny here, and better options as starters, there was no need for him in the rotation. He might have another window next year for the rotation, but with our young arms coming up, that window could close fast, if it even opens at all.
4. There was a recent thread which noted concluded that, although Soriano’s contract is excessive, that he is still for the most part worth (or close to worth) his salary.
If that is the case, why is his contract considered “immovable”? If a contract is reasonable (or even close to reasonable), a trade should be possible since the player is being paid close to market value, especially when a team has needs for such a player.
Too much money down the road for an aging player. Nothing’s immovable, but for the Cubs to move Soriano, they’ll have to eat most, if not all, the future money, as few teams will take the risk.
by toonsterwu on Jul 14, 2010 7:58 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
definiely agree about Sori.
You’d have to pay the majority of the money, and why do that for him to play on another team when he does produce? Unless he has a blockbuster year that I don’t see happening(which is the only way I think a team would take on most of his salary), he’s here to stay as it’s not worth it to throw away all that money for him on another team.
"The ones who want to achieve and win championships motivate themselves." - Da Coach
by Sandberg's evil twin on Jul 14, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions
We talk a lot about certain contracts being "untradeable" or "unmovable".
There are two contracts on the Cubs that probably fit this description, one for sure. Fukudome is most likely untradeable, and the only reason he might not be unmovable would be the admittedly remote possibility that the Cubs could help him get a similar deal back in Japan, which someone mentioned on a different thread. But Soriano is the one contract in which there is nothing we can do but wait it out. It’s untradable, unmovable, un-anything. Like it or not, he is our left fielder for four more years. No Major League GM in their right mind would ever take on that contract.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004
good response
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jul 15, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions
appreciate the thoughtful response
as always…
"Wait, are you saying I'm a sunshine-pumping, koolaid-drinking, Soriano-loving, rainbow-rising, unicorn-riding, double-clutching, Sweet Lou-backing, Hendry-supporting, hey hey whaddya saying, Cubs are going all the waying, glass is overflowing, Rothschild is all-knowing, Cubs fan? - ballhawk
All pitching should be on the table
We have a surplus of promising young middle of the rotation arms with a need for power CI and CO bats. We should use our pitching surplus to help balance this out. We don’t have to do anything that we don’t like but it doesn’t hurt to test the market.
Royals have some nice young pitching with Montgomery and Lamb but outside of that, I don’t recall them having a whole lot. Kila seems like he could be a nice bat for us. If we perceive Gorz to be the better starter of the two, maybe we could start the bidding with Marshall and see where it gets us.
on the pitching side
don’t forget about chris dwyer, tim melville, and aaron crow. Melville/Crow have struggled a bit, but both still have good upsides. And as the 4th and 5th pitching prospects in a system … that’s pretty good.
I mean, the only relatively big system holes I see is up the middle, and even then, they did just draft Christian Colon.
good lefty arm
drafted in the 4th round from clemson last year as a draft-eligible freshman (something about being held back one year and going to prep school as well). He’s more than a Rusin type, though. FB is in the low 90’s for the most part, and he has a good curve. Changeup has reportedly improved by a fair amount this year, so he looks, right now, to be more than your classic mid-end of the rotation lefty. There are some control concerns. We’ll find out how serious they are soon, as he was just bumped up to AA.
In some ways, he’s their Chris Archer, but he probably has a touch higher value than Archer.
1. He was discussed as trade bait because he’s cheap, because the Cubs had excess starting pitchers, and because the Cubs were at one point potentially buyers. It’s looking less like there’s an excess of starters, and less likely that we’ll be buyers. So he’s probably not trade bait anymore.
2. I don’t know anything about that guy or about the Royals, so I won’t comment except to say that people often come up with unrealistic trade proposals on fan sites.
3. Because we have Lilly and Gorzellany in the rotation. We aren’t going with three lefties, and Lilly and Gorzellany are pitching fine in the rotation. And Marshall is pitching great in the bullpen. Maybe if/when Lilly goes we’ll eventually see Marshall in the rotation (though that’d have to wait until next year as I doubt they’ll stretch him out during the season).
4. There’s a difference between being basically worth the salary right now and being worth the salary down the road. It’s debatable whether Soriano is worth $18 million right now (I’d say he’s not). But everyone expects that he’ll be worth $18 million in 2-3 years as he gets to be an old player. Smart teams don’t make trades based only on player’s current value. They consider the player’s expected value over the remainder of the contract, which doesn’t look good for Soriano.
gorz
will not be traded.take it to the bank.he pitches good and is cheap.we need that for next year when lily and maybe z are gone.
While there is no need to trade Gorz for the reasons you mention
he might still get traded if the right deal is offered
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jul 19, 2010 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions

by 




















