What The Cubs Gave Up
Or What You Leave Behind.
Today was a troubling day for me here at BCB, since all of my articles that I spent many hours on before Christmas working on for the Maple Street Press Annual got creamed. Not only did the profiles for four of my Top 20 prospects have to be tossed, I also had profiles of Chris Archer and Robinson Chirinos written for the Annual. I knew that Chirinos was trade bait (because he'd never beat out Geovany Soto for a job) and even said so in the article. But I decided to write on him anyway because I had a great story to go with. I thought I was on safe ground with Archer, arguably our number one prospect.
You're never going to see either article, unless someone from Tampa wants to buy them off of me. Actually, I think Maple Street Press still owns them, so you might have to buy them off of them too. It's too bad because I loved the Chirinos article. It was a big tribute to what I saw Chirinos representing: the career minor leaguer who rides the buses out of love of the game and that seemingly impossible dream that keeps them going. Yes, Bull Durham was mentioned. I'm a sucker for those guys. Sometimes people ask me why I bother reporting when one of those guys have a good game when I could be telling you that a real prospect went 1 for 4 or gave up a run in an inning of relief. I do it for a lot of reasons, but a big one is because I want to thank those career minor leaguers for their service to the game. They get precious little otherwise.
What you are going to get is my write-up of the four players we had to cut from the Top 20 Prospects list, as well as my take on the Garza trade.
I know that prospects are made to be traded. That's the nature of the business. In fact, with the exception of Archer, it made a lot of sense for the Cubs to trade the players they did, and even Archer made some sense. My problem is that I am simply not convinced that Matt Garza is the type of guy you want to give them up with. Don't tell me he's a "proven pitcher with World Series experience." If that's all you want, Jarrod Washburn has been a free agent since last year. No pitcher is ever "proven," they're all just one arm injury away from losing it all. (Yes, that goes for Chris Archer too.) Besides, that kind of non-statistical analysis has always just struck me as a way of justifying what you already believed anyway for no good reason. As someone once said of intangibles, if they actually had an impact on the game, wouldn't we be able to see that impact?
I'm also dubious of his ability to succeed at Wrigley Field. People have argued that he's going from the AL East to the NL Central, and while that doesn't make him a better pitcher, it might mean that he's a better pitcher than he's shown. I think I read somewhere that Garza had the second-toughest opponents hitting against him, so it is possible that he'll thrive against weaker hitters, although it's not like the Reds and Brewers are the Seattle Mariners. But a combination of a low strikeout rate, a high fly-ball rate and going from an excellent defensive team to a below average defensive team makes me think trouble lies ahead. Going from the Trop to Wrigley Field isn't going to be good either.
I'm not saying that Garza is going to be terrible. He's a good pitcher and will likely stay being a good pitcher for the Cubs. But there are significant risks and I don't think Garza is good enough to gut your farm system.
Luckily, the Cub farm system is pretty deep right now. In fact, I have already replaced the four names here with four more players and the hardest part of it was deciding which four. If we had the #8 Farm system yesterday, then we don't today. But we still have a good farm system.
Now, on to what we gave up:
2. Chris Archer RHP 6'3" 180 lbs. Age: 22 Acquired: Trade with Cleveland 2008
Archer was the Cubs Minor League Pitcher of the Year after a stellar season with both Daytona and Tennessee, where he dominated hitters at both levels. In 142 innings, Archer struck out 149 batters and held them to a .200 batting average. Overall, he went 15-3 with a 2.34 ERA. Archer's strength is that he gets good movement on both his fastball and breaking pitches. His fastball sits at 92-94 with good movement and he has a nasty slider that breaks out of the strike zone.
What has always done in Archer in years past is a lack of control. It's a good thing that he has so much movement on his pitches, but he often has trouble getting it over the plate. When the Cubs acquired him in the Mark DeRosa trade, they saw a raw talent who they thought could make some adjustments that would help him with his control. So far they've had some success as he's cut his walk numbers in each of the past two seasons, and while no one would term the 65 walks he issued this season as a good thing, it's a big improvement over his numbers with Cleveland.Archer's changeup is only so-so, which is why some scouts don't think he'll be more than a #3 starter. Some have argued that he'd be better ditching the changeup altogether and relying on just the fastball and slider. The idea is that he could be a dominating closer. However, with Carlos Marmol and possibly Andrew Cashner as closing possibilities, Archer will stay in the rotation for now. He'll likely start the season in Iowa and could be the very first pitcher called up to the majors when there is a spot open in the rotation. Barring injury, Archer should pitch at Wrigley Field sometime in 2011.
I had a lot more to say about Archer in the full profile of him. I think the description of him as a #3 is being conservative. I don't think he'll ever have the command to be a #1 pitcher, but I think his ceiling is as a #2. However, ceilings are just that, and it certainly was more likely that he was going to end up as a #3. But since that's what I think Matt Garza is, that's not an insult to Archer. So we gave up six years of Archer (plus other stuff) for three years of Garza.
But I don't think Archer is going to be a starter for Tampa Bay at all. My comment on him ditching the changeup and becoming a closer looks closer to reality now. The Rays have a ton of starting pitching and more on the way, which is why they traded Garza. What they are losing is a closer in Rafael Soriano, and Archer could step into that role as soon as this season. I don't see him starting the year as the closer, but he might finish it. In that role, I can see him being similar to Francisco Rodriguez, in that he combines good heat with a nasty slider that breaks out of the zone.
One reason the Cubs might want to trade Archer is Trey McNutt. They're similar pitchers and while Archer is a bit more advanced, McNutt has shown better control and it's not hard to find someone who thinks McNutt is the better prospect. If you want to know whether I ranked Archer or McNutt higher, you'll just have to buy the MSP Annual. Since I ranked Archer at #2, McNutt would be #1 if I did.
If you're in an AL-only fantasy league, Archer might be worth picking up late as the closer job in Tampa is going to be unsettled. If you're not in an AL-only fantasy league and want to be, drop me a line because I'm thinking of starting one. (I hate it when my fantasy players play the Cubs. This is my solution this year.)
5. Hak-Ju Lee SS 6'2" 170 lbs. Age: 20 Acquired: International signing, 2009. Korea
Lee didn't make a great leap forward in 2010, but neither did he hurt his prospect status with a solid year in low-A Peoria. After a slow start in April and May, Lee rebounded to hit .282 with a .354 OBP and 32 steals for the whole year. Defensively, he's still got the tools to be a gold glove caliber shortstop and he often makes plays that make minor league fans go "wow." But he's still raw and inexperienced, often making bad reads on balls and booting easy grounders in the same game.
Lee is a slap hitter who gets a running start out of the batter's box. It gives him an incredibly fast home-to-first time, but it also means he does not hit the ball with much authority. He does leg out some doubles, however.
If Lee lives up to his potential, he'll be a gold glove caliber shortstop who could be a solid leadoff or number-two hitter, although it's extremely unlikely that he ever hits for much power. Whether Starlin Castro will have to move to second base to make room for Lee is still an open question. Fortunately, it won't have to be answered next year and maybe not even in 2012.The Cubs have been very methodical with Lee so far, leaving him in Boise and Peoria for a full season each. But they might start getting more aggressive with Lee now that he is older and more comfortable in America, so while he should start the season in Daytona, a mid-season promotion is not out of the question anymore
It actually makes some sense to deal Lee because Castro has established himself as the Cubs SS for years to come. Although some scouts (and fans on this board) think that Castro is never going to be a good defensive SS, I think it makes sense to leave him there as long as possible. He's still young and while Castro doesn't have Lee's tools defensively, you can see how he might be a solid defensive SS one day. On top of that, the Cubs system is loaded with guys who can play second base. They aren't loaded with shortstops.
Lee is the hardest one of the four to project. He's still very young and very raw. I liked the way he got a lot better as the season in Peoria went on. His speed is something the Cubs could use more of, and he bats from the left side. But that slap approach at the plate might get him eaten alive as he moves up the ladder. In any case, he's never going to develop any significant power. He could be a gold glove shortstop, but right now he's a flashy but erratic kid. It was likely we were going to have to deal him after Castro established himself. The question is was now the time to deal him and was Garza the guy to deal him for.
11. Brandon Guyer OF 6'1" 210 Age: 25 Acquired: 2007 Amateur Draft 5th Round
Guyer was a rising star in the Cubs system after a strong 2008 season in Peoria, but he flopped in 2009 when promoted to Double A. He rebounded slightly after a demotion to Daytona, but in his second chance at Tennessee in 2010, he exploded. He finished the season hitting .344, which was a Smokies franchise record, along with 13 home runs and 39 doubles. He stole 30 bases and was only caught 3 times. In his last 54 games, he hit an unbelievable .427. For his efforts, he was named Cubs Minor League Player of the Year.
Despite that, Guyer is not a great prospect. He was a bit old for Double A and was repeating the level. His defense isn't quite good enough for center field and he's not likely to have the power you want in a corner outfielder. He might be a perfect fourth outfielder/pinch hitter, however. His style of play and reckless distain for his own personal safety has drawn comparisons to Eric Byrnes, and that might be a best-case scenario for him.
I guess I'm going to have to re-write that profile of Guyer I did for the 2009 MSP Annual too. What Guyer did in the second half for Tennessee last year was simply unbelievable. So unbelievable, in fact, that a lot of us chose not to believe it. Except for last season, he also has a hard time staying healthy. I think my second paragraph sums up my feelings on him. If everything breaks right for him, he's Eric Byrnes. That's something useful to have, but not exactly anything you'd cry about losing for Matt Garza. If everything breaks on him (and it just might the way he plays) then he's nothing.
14. Robinson Chirinos C 6’1" 195 Age: 27 Acquired: International signing 2000 Venezuela.
It only took Chirinos a decade in the Cubs system, but he’s finally a top prospect. Since converting from infielder to catcher in 2008, Chirinos has done nothing but hit, and the reports on his fielding and the way he handles a pitching staff have been good as well. Last season between Tennessee and Iowa, Chirinos hit .326 with 18 home runs and a .416 OBP. It’s not really a fluke, either, as Chirinos hit .294 with 11 homers and a .396 OBP the year before. The Cubs finally added him to their 40-man roster this off-season, so he should get a chance at least to make the team out of spring training, even if the numbers might mean he returns to Iowa.
Chirinos could have been the backup catcher we've been dreaming of everytime we see Koyie Hill come to the plate. He was never going to be as good as Soto though, so it did make some sense to trade him. But I think he might end up being the Rays starting catcher this season. He's like their current catcher, John Jaso, except with a little more power and better defense.
There are reasons to regret trading Chirinos. One is having to endure another season of Koyie Hill. Another is that I think his trade value would be even higher if he spent a season backing up Soto. But it's clear that the Cubs had to trade him eventually. The question is only whether this was the right opportunity to do it.
Couple of fun facts from the article. Chirinos started as a shortstop, and in his first year in rookie ball in Arizona, the catchers on his team were Geo Soto and Carlos Marmol. His family also lives in Daytona Beach during the season (he's spent a lot of time with the D-Cubs) so I'm sure he's happy that if he had to be traded, it was to Tampa Bay.
Yeah, right. I'll let Jessica tell you about him as she clearly has a much higher opinion of him than I do. I might suggest she now start championing Tony Campana.
158 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
lots
of people thought lily would be a bust at wrigley but we got 4 good years from him. this showsme the cubs want to try and win in 2011. with garza aboard im sure silva or gorz will be traded.and we all know nobody will want silva.
Nice Post
Here’s my opinion after all day to think about it…..
Yes, we gave up alot of value to get Garza. We could argue this whole deal continuously and probably will. Time will only tell who’s right and who’s wrong. Garza has some flaws and no were not challenging for anything next season as I think most of us can agree with.
What we did get is add another nice, not studly starter who is young and will provide some value. At the end of the day I believe the Cubs as a whole are a better team both now and for at least 3 more years with the Garza addition. He’s not gonna make or break a payroll.
In 2011 I really hope the likes of Z, Garza, Demp pitch great and prove their wealth. I hope Mike Qaude pans out and gets some sense of team player outta the team. If we can learn to sacrifice for each other for the betterment of the team while doing the small things(fundamentals) correctly, I think we are setup perfectly for 2012 when alot of payroll comes off the books.
In 2011 we really need for some young players to turn out and show something. Will Jackson be a CF, will Vitters be a 3b, will Mcnutt or Cashner factor in, will Colvin prove to a fulltime Major league OF.
Next offseason after these questions are answered and money becomes available we can become a contender again with some lucky breaks and a smart offseason.
Having read and edited both of Josh's articles....
… they were both really good. Sorry no one but he and I will ever read them.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
why is that exactly?
Why does MSP have ownership of something that will never get published? Shouldn’t Josh still retain rights?
Of course on the other hand, if Josh already got paid, then I guess MSP can do whatever they want with it. Josh – you did get paid, didn’t you?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Unless it's work for hire
Rights revert to the author after an article has been published and/or a given amount of time has passed, usually 3 months. I’ve re sold many articles to overseas magazines that way.
by Clark Addison on Jan 8, 2011 9:55 AM CST up reply actions
that's what i don't get - they were never published, so there's no reversion involved.
If they’re not published, seems like they’d still belong to the author. The only thing I can think of that would trump that logic would be payment. If MSP has already paid Josh, then it stands to follow that whatever Josh produced would belong to MSP, regardless of whether it gets published or not.
Of course, this all probably falls under the “it’s none of my business” umbrella. I’m just hoping that Josh doesn’t suffer the double-whammy – no published stories and no money. That would definitely not seem right.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
I am getting a reduced rate
for the articles.
by Josh Timmers on Jan 8, 2011 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
well, at least that's something
I’m guessing you’d much rather have had the articles published, but at least there’s some sort of compensation for the work involved.
Good thing too, because I just about ready to place a call into BCB’s own version of Michael Clayton and The Wolf. You know, someone who ‘fixes’ things. Yes, I’m talking about you, Doggie. MSP wouldn’t know what hit them… ;-)
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
I will inquire as to the exact status of the articles, per the contracts MSP sent out.
If they can be posted here, I’ll let Josh post them.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Funny you should mention Campana
He seems a lot like Fuld, minus the crash dummy mentality and the Stanford degree.
I think everyone but some Rays fans know Fuld was added as an act of charity of Hendry’s part. I have little doubt he asked the Rays if they thought he might make their bench (looking at their depth chart I think the answer is yes) because he was unlikely to make the Cubs bench. I think it is unfortunate that the Cubs never found a spot for a guy who could have been a very nice 5th OF, but a lot of bad timing involved.
The Cubs will have to keep an eye on the waiver wire or go dumpster diving because having traded both Guyer & Fuld they really don’t have a 5th OF unless you want to rely on Perez or Campana which I don’t.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
There may be another deal ahead.
The Cubs clearly have some starting pitcher depth now. They could easily trade Tom Gorzelanny for some bench help.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
They could but it would be a pretty crappy trade
A lefty SP even one that is back of the rotation is worth a tad more than a 5th OF which is what they are missing.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 7, 2011 9:31 PM CST up reply actions
Sure.
I’m not saying that’s ALL they could get for Gorz, but that could be part of a deal.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Well what they need is to restock the farm
A right handed 5th OF can most likely be found without a trade. One of the reasons I really hate this trade is that the Cubs will be looking for a LOT of pieces next year and have now traded many of their best chips for something that they did not need as much.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 7, 2011 9:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, with all the Hell that's been raised around here today...
…I’m thinking that Garza to the Yankees for Jesus (Montero) sounds about right.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
I dunno about two.
But clearly, the Cubs now have people that are tradeable.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
That's me speculating...
But with the Convention coming, Hendry knows he’s gonna be roasted and needs something to shield himself with. I really really think this deal is a precursor to at least a Gorzo deal and maybe one more.
I really don't think
that not getting roasted at the convention is part of Hendry’s motivation in making trades. Nor do I think he is as bad a GM as people here make him out to be. You want bad then get Bavazi, that is what a bad GM looks like.
Baseball is too much of a sport to be a business and too much of a business to be a sport.
William Wrigley Jr
by bubbamike the one and only on Jan 7, 2011 10:02 PM CST up reply actions
Well, let's see, the on-the-block list includes at least Silva and Fukudome
If Hendry could move those two, he gets his Trade Magician designation back…
One difference
is that while Fuld is fast, Campana is blazing fast. Michael Bourn fast. He’s the fastest guy in the system.
And the University of Cincinnati is a fine institution of higher learning.
Bobby Scales is hurt - hurt, I tell you - that you're not considering him for that coveted 5th OF spot.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Jan 8, 2011 12:03 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Excellent work, Josh
I worry that we may lament giving up Archer, but those are gambles that sometimes need to be taken.
Honestly don’t care about the other guys. I’m not interested in hanging on to interchangeable parts until they have no value.
Any thoughts on the “other” guys that came along with Garza? Any chance they are sleepers in this trade?
"If a horse can't eat it, I don't want to play on it." Dick Allen
perez is a swap for fuld
maybe jimbo swapped archer for matt moore
He's my Hossa
HO-HO-HO-HO-HOSSA
by jesus christos on Jan 7, 2011 8:25 PM CST up reply actions
please be the child of albert pujols
He's my Hossa
HO-HO-HO-HO-HOSSA
by jesus christos on Jan 7, 2011 8:58 PM CST up reply actions
Fernando Perez
is Minor League roster filler.
He’s apparently quite a poet. And he went to Columbia, so Jessica can have her Ivy Leaguer.
Of course Fuld wasn't an Ivy Leaguer.
or a poet.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 7, 2011 10:01 PM CST up reply actions
In the athletic world any college that makes athletes actually pass real classes = "Ivy League"
And any athlete that is literate is a poet!
Perez
Yeah, there’s nothing to indicate that he’s major league material, but there’s always that off chance that he’ll make it. That’s unlikely.
2011 - The 103rd time is the charm.
where?
outside of a few posters here speculating i’ve seen nothing suggesting that
follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jan 7, 2011 8:38 PM CST up reply actions
I just looked through that site.
I can’t find anything that mentions anything like that.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I heard it as well.
I saw mine on HotStove Cubbies. I don’t know how legit the website is though. I just want to know who the guy is.. soon.
It's Zack Rosscup.
He’s not listed among the Rays top 48 prospects. 22 years old and 12 rookie-lowA games under his belt last year.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Jan 9, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions
From another "source"
A guy on another site who apparently has some sort of insider connection to the Cubs (called the Hayden Simpson pick; called the interest in Garza; called Archer’s inclusion in the deal, among other things) said that the pitching prospect from the Rays is “a good prospect. Much more than just a throw-in.” With a system as pitching rich as the Rays, even a top 20 prospect has a chance to crack the top 10 with the Cubs. The prospect essentially makes or breaks the deal for me.
Well.... that source didn't pan out this time.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Jan 9, 2011 9:45 AM CST up reply actions
A question for you Josh
Ignoring the question of whether the trade made sense for the Cubs based on their current position, what is your take on the overpaying? That is what bugs me more than anything about this deal. Two top 4 prospects with good possible upside for a #2/#3 pitcher seems overpaying to me.
Hendry always seems to overpay for everything.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
One way to look at overpaying
If you don’t want to trade one stud prospect, you have to find a team that values multiple players. No one team is going to put the highest value on all of your prospects.
Let’s say the Cubs, given their needs and opinions of the players, rate four prospects on a ten-point scale as 8, 6, 5, 4. They try to deal with the Padres, who rate the same players 7, 7, 3, 5. Then they turn to the Rays, who rate the players 9, 5, 4, 6. While this is simplistic, it illustrates that you might have to include a certain player, or an extra player, to get a player you want, because the prospects you have are not equally valuable to all teams.
This isn’t an excuse for Hendry. If he truly believe Garza is a top 10 pitcher, then I think he’s wrong. He overpaid, but doesn’t think so. On the other hand, if the Rays valued guys like Chirinos and Lee higher than other teams, you might be willing to do a deal with them.
No one should be untouchable on this roster unless his name is Eliot Ness...or Starlin Castro.
And you might be right
Maybe Hendry believes he is a top 10 pitcher. We better hope he is right.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Well whether he believes it or not
he is wrong. Perhaps Garza can BECOME a top 10 pitcher, that seems a stretch based on what i’m reading though.
by English Cub Fan on Jan 7, 2011 9:24 PM CST up reply actions
And I agree which is why I don't like the deal.
True Garza’s 2010 wasn’t as good as 2008 and 2009 but he was close to league average last year. That isn’t someone you give up a ton to get.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Yeah the thing that irks me is the
AL East factor. I believe the perception that Garza will turn into a significantly better pitcher because he’s coming from the AL East is being given too much credibility., for all the reasons mentioned before.
A high fly ball rate pitcher moving into an unfriendly ball bark with a worse defence, doesn’t exactly scream improvement to me.
by English Cub Fan on Jan 7, 2011 9:40 PM CST up reply actions
Hendry should be committed.
Considering that Garza isn’t even one of the ten best pitchers east of the Mississippi River.
“Absolutely without question better than Garza”: Sabathia, Lester, Bucholtz, Price, Verlander, Halladay, Cliff Lee, Oswalt, Hamels, Josh Johnson, Greinke, Hudson, Santana (13).
“The group where you can start to have the debate, but a number of these guys are better than Garza”: Gallardo, Hanson, Scherzer, Marcum, Danks, Romero, Guthrie, Wade Davis, Floyd, Hughes, Sanchez, Cueto, Dempster, (13).
I didn’t even include guys with better/comparable numbers like RA Dickey & Livan Hernandez.
So… keeping in mind that this is only pitchers east of the big river (no STL, HOU, MIN, or any western division team)… you’ve got at least 13 guys who are clearly better and another 13 up for argument.
You could reasonably have a healthy debate as to whether Garza is one of the 30 best SP in all of baseball, but that is really about the ceiling.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
So there you go...
even if he fits in 30-50, he is theoretically a #2 starter.
by SouthWabashSoul on Jan 8, 2011 9:27 PM CST up reply actions
Everyone thinks he's a #2-type starter.
Hendry thinks Garza’s in the top 10 in all of baseball – i.e., a good #1 starter. And that’s what he paid for. Hopefully time will prove him right.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Jan 9, 2011 9:46 AM CST up reply actions
The thing is
that if you value Garza more than I value him, I don’t think you’re overpaying. I’m hearing that the Rangers had a pretty good offer on the table too. Their offer was more MLB-ready guys and fewer guys with Archer or Lee’s upside.
If you think Garza is going to be a really good pitcher for the Cubs over the next three years, we did not overpay, because we just barely topped the Rangers offer.
I'm in your boat on Garza though
Nice pitcher. Obviously a short-term upgrade but hardly a TOR guy.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Thinking about the Rangers, I'm not sure who they would have offered to help short-term
Looking over the roster, I suspect Tommy Hunter and ????
Was the Rangers offer still on the table after Beltre? They sure seem to have a lot of money now.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
I suppose in that context
one would have to agree that we did not overpay. I don’t have any qualms with the acquisition though, he’ll obviously be a solid pitcher for 3 years + (if healthy, naturally)
by English Cub Fan on Jan 7, 2011 10:03 PM CST up reply actions
this is a good move...
If pitching is king, then adding a starter of Garza’s talents is nothing but a positive. Did we give too much for essentially one player? Sure. Prospects are prospects, that’s the best way to put it, I think. Time will tell. I have not yet resigned myself that next season is a loss. Who knows what could happen. Did I expect the Cubs to contend in ’03, or ’07? Not really. If they truly want to contend in ’11, then adding Garza- despite the “cost”, is a positive step in that direction.
I'm a truth teller, I'm a risk taker, I'm like Johnny Cash - I walk the line...
by Jimmyeatworld on Jan 7, 2011 9:18 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I don't see it as that simple
There is no doubt that Garza will help the Cubs in 2011 but at what cost? The Brewers got Marcum for Lowrie. I wonder if the Cubs could have picked up Marcum for Lee, Chirinos and Guyer. I bet it could have come close and they would have kept Archer. Or even substitute Archer for Lee and keep Lee. Is there really much difference between those guys? Marcum was better in 2010 so it is a crap shoot who is better in 2011.
That is my biggest problem. I have zero faith in Jim Hendry. I think he is always in react mode. Oh no, the Cards and Brewers did something I have to react. I have to get lefty so let’s sign Bradley for 3 years. He never seems to drive the hard bargain. The rumors were always that the Rays needed 2 top prospects to trade Garza. Why didn’t Hendry wait? There was no rush for this deal. After Beltre signed, the only likely other place for Garza was the Nationals. Hendry always seems the nice guy who overpays, see Miles, Grabow and Bradley. I do not think the Cubs will ever win with him as GM.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
by rlpete on Jan 7, 2011 9:46 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Jays GM wanted Lawrie. Various teams including the Mariners and Padres and Jays have asked about him for a while. Melvin kept saying no until Marcum was offered. I don’t think it was a matter of Marcum being offered and a trade being worked out. I’d bet both teams went into the off-season thinking that both players would still be on their teams next season.
Quantity over quality usually doesn’t work either.
Oh Jimmy I was waiting for someone to say "Prospects are prospects"
So I could post Keith Law’s response to a Cub fan who did that in the comments to Law’s ripping the deal
“One thing to always keep in mind, that a lot of people don’t, is that prospects are just prospects. "Wow, thank God you’re here to remind us of that. We’ve never, ever had anyone throw that out there as a desperate attempt to rationalize the fact that his favorite team just gave up a ton of young talent for an insufficient return. Thank you for enlightening us all.
It is fun that Law seems to be one of the few writers to respond to posts in real time and often.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 7, 2011 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That's a real crappy thing for Law to say.
Pomposity squared. Ugh.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
And "Prospects are prospects"
is a really crappy thing for someone to say when others are trying to have a legitimate conversation about the worth of a trade.
by Xoomwaffle on Jan 8, 2011 8:11 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
And to the "Prospects are just Prospects" crowd
Would you have been happy if Brett Jackson was included too? How about McNutt? Why? Garza makes the Cubs better in 2011. Isn’t that a good thing? Jackson and McNutt may not pan out. The Cubs have lots of prospects anyway.
That is the point. Everyone has a point where the deal is too expensive. To many of us, this was too expensive for a pitcher that I see as a Ted Lilly 2.0. If Garza becomes a top pitcher in the NL as many here believe, I’ll admit I was wrong.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
You would not be wrong if Archer becomes a top pitcher
and Lee a good starting SS.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 10:31 AM CST up reply actions
The thread had a lot of serious back and forth.
Whatever you think of his opinions Law is the only guy writing for one of the big
sites that I see regularaly interact with people posting.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 10:30 AM CST up reply actions
Just had a Freudian reading slip
I clicked back ont the post and thought the headline was “WHY the Cubs gave up” instead of WHAT the Cubs gave up.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
Sorry about your articles Josh
Now I’m really not OK with the trade
"A dream you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream together is reality." John Lennon
"My favorite food is Macaroni and Cheese, from the blue box." Geovany Soto
"They played like son of a guns......lord have mercy." Mike Quade
Josh do at least get paid more if write up Garza?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
Josh is working on another prospect profile.
We’re looking for someone who knows the Rays better to write about Garza.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Is he doing Marwin Gonzalez?
He just moved up on the Cubs SS depth chart. I kid I kid.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 7, 2011 10:15 PM CST up reply actions
I'm the minor league guy anyway
So unless Garza is headed back to Iowa, he’s out of my league, so to speak.
I can tell you he was born in Selma, California, the Raisin Capital of the World.
by Josh Timmers on Jan 7, 2011 10:13 PM CST up reply actions
Didn't Know There Was A Selma, California
I had only heard of Selma, Alabama.
2011 - The 103rd time is the charm.
Archer was a
reliever/closer anyway. While he had some upside as a starter, his size and lack of changeup would mess him up.
Sucks to lose Lee, because I think he’ll be a stah, but 3 years of #2 pitcher is fine with me too. As long as Jackson and Vitters arne’t traded I’m good to go…
I am in almost complete agreement
with all of Josh’s points. Like him, I had a feeling of sadness seeing Chirinos leave and Hill remain. There is no doubt in my mind that Chirinos is a much better and cheaper alternative to Hill. On the other hand, I’m not convinced that Lee would ever make it to the bigs. If his numbers aren’t dominating in the low minors, why should we expect he’d be a quality SS in the ML?
Ultimately, I’m still looking for a clue as to the plan the organization has chosen to get us into the elite status. I don’t want a Cubs team that is competitive. I want a contender each and every year. Are we building from within? Are we a buyer for the top FA candidates? Or are we merely a reactive team that constantly plays to the public?
I have serious doubts trusting a GM who values Hill as an adequate roster player and who believes Garza is one of the 10 best pitchers in baseball. And why is it that the Rays knew exactly who they were getting but we are still unable to name the PTBNL? It all appears as if JH is unable to be a hard negotiator.
If a quality pitching start is 3 runs and 6 innings, then a quality hitting day is 1 for 4.
totally agree with you regarding Hill and Lee
What about Beef? He seems like the forgotten catcher in the Cubs organization.
The 2010 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp ruled!!!!
I think I said many of the exact same things yesterday.
Of course you summarized it well in a single post.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Regardless of what we gave up for him...
(and this doesn’t mean I want everyone to stop talking about the prospects, I’ve loved reading everyone’s reactions), Garza is now a Cub. I’m honestly extremely excited to watch him pitch in Cubbie blue and I feel like he’ll be a player that meshes really well with the rest of the clubhouse.
Also, as much as my head tells me we won’t make the playoffs next year, and certainly on paper the Cards/Reds/Brewers look better than us, my heart tells me there’s always a chance that we can catch lightning in a bottle. Hell, the White Sox did it in ‘05, the Cards in ’06, and the Giants last year. As unlikely as I know this to be, there’s always a chance…
But anyway, welcome Matt. Here’s to hoping that you have a stellar career with the Cubs and fall in love with the team as much as we have.
Recommended, Josh.
You’re great. I wouldn’t know anything about our minor leaguers without your help. Thanks.
Oh, and sign me up for your fantasy league.
Dan
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Prospects are prospects Current 2011 outlook
*I will preface this post that i do believe I could have made a separate post but just wasn’t up for it. So please read below my current opinions on the 2011 season. I’m interested in feedback and what you may or may not disagree with.
I wish they were more than that but in the last 5 years I can’t think of many players that have panned out to be what was projected (my mind is mush lately but please give me a few examples).
I’m all for the realization Cubs might not contend in 2011 but Garza adds depth to pitching in 2012. Can anyone actually argue that Cubs won’t be in contention for a Fielder calibre player that year? Okay I jumped the gun, let’s talk 2011.
Cardinals: They underperformed in 2009 and 2010. The fact their team did not make the playoffs in 2010 is just as much of a failure as Cubs not making in 2004 and 2009. Yes, I really do believe we can compare 2004 Cubs to 2009 and 2010 Cardinals.
Reds: They are good. But they have an ego. Sorry, call me a Cubs fan who thinks he knows Dusty Baker too much but I think the Reds expect the division handed to them. Hopefully it’s their @$$ that gets handed instead.
Brewers: They will contend. They have the pitching and the hitting. But to be honest, what makes them any better than 2007 or 2008 Brewers? To be honest, the only answer is Greinke. However he is a wildcard. I still am not sure if the guy is crazy or not. This team did get the wildcard in 2008 and did better than Cubs in the playoffs. There’s no reason why they can’t next year. I’ve felt the Brewers never scouted division rivals too well and that hurt them. If they do a better job, they are the team to be reckoened with. A plus for the Cubs is that they play very well in Milwaukee.
Astros: I can’t say much about them. Every year I think they will suck and the team tends to overperform. Chances are that will remain the same as last year. A thorn in Cubs side…unless ur big Z.
Pirates: Honestly I can’t say anything. Cubs should have had 7-10 more wins against them last year. They are the Cubs wildcard in 2011. This is the team they need to improve upon. Getting a winning record against Pirates should boost the teams record.
Additional Improvements: Bullpen should be better. I love Kerry Wood but we have to except it if he just doesn’t perform. Our starting rotation should be solid. Ramirez is on a contract year so lets hope he’s better too. Cubs should also let Pena use them for his contract year. Other than that we have Colvin and Castro hopefully not having sophomore slumps.
Overall the Cubs will go down two paths. Either it will be a repeat of 2009 & 2010 (AKA they should score more runs or bullpen failed) or this team will perform better than 95% of believed.
Maybe its too early to tell but if everyone on the team performs at the level we expect, they will be over .500 and contend in September. Even if they don’t make it to postseason (which would be disappointed) it would be nice to have a team to follow until the end of the season.
I would love to debate these thoughts even more… I’m a relocated Cubs fans as most know and this is my place to have some debates. Tell me if you think I’m on target or not?
One more fact
They need to scout the NL East and West better. There was no excuse losing series to the Mets the last two years.
-Teams like Phillies and Braves you should expect to split series with. I know the Marlins have an imaginary curse on us but Cubs need to beat them in series.
-Don’t even get me started with NL West. We all know Cubs suck against them. They need better scouting end of story.
I didn’t mention interleague because you never know. On paper Cubs should be the Royals and hopefully win the series against White Sox. Cubs are palying Red Sox and Yankees. Unfortunately you need to look at this as a fans dream. Yankees are in Wrigley - let’s hope they have HF advantange.
Cubs are playing at Fenway for the first time. I’ve waited for this series since I went to college at UMass. I know they will probably lose if not get swept. It’s for the experience of seeing them at Fenway.
My point as rambled as it is (we drank a lot here tonight). Improve in your division, don’t worry about interleague and please beat the Pirates!
I think the only thng I might agree with is
you drank a lot last night. I don’t understand all the scouting references. Winning and losing may not always be related to scouting but on quality of the teams involved.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
I'll further explain
(Boy I rambled last night!)
With the exception to 2010, the Cubs have always played well within their division even when they sucked. Just look at their record vs. NL Central in 2006, I think you will be very surprised.
It’s the other divisions that really hurt the Cubs. Historically they have played horrible against the NL West and NL East…even during good seasons. I’d bring in interleague to the argument but historically, most NL teams don’t play well in those series.
I think the teams have focused more than enough energy on the NL Central but not enough on other divisions. Again, this can explain their horrible performance in the playoffs in 2007 and 2008. I think last year the entire system just napped through Lou’s management and did a lousy job. Hopefully there will be improvements thsi year.
I find your scouting comments interesting
Not something I had noticed, but definitely possible and fits a pattern. The team doesn’t seem to do a very good job on behind-the-scenes work. Scouting is one of the areas, and includes both major league scouting and looking for young talent. The failures of the training staff the last two seasons have been galling – letting veterans keep playing while obviously hurt and damaging the team’s performance (Soriano in 2009; Lee and Ramirez in 2010).
The team just needs to do a better job of the nuts and bolts of operating a ball club. That’s something the Ricketts family could fix without spending $$$$.
The scouting comment about the Brewers makes me think of Dempster. It seems like he owned them with the same pitches and sequences in game after game. I don’t know how Garza will do, but Lily owned them too. At least in highlights, Garza throws a lot of high fastballs – those have been pretty effective against a lot of the aggressive hitters on the team.
Why do people here seem to think that a trade should be evaluated based on how it turns out?
If you invest your entire salary in lotto tickets and then happen to win the lottery, does that make putting your whole paycheck into the lottery a good decision? You evaluate based on the best information available comparing the expected value of one side against the expected value of the other side.
Prospects are just prospects? Could be a complete bust? Here’s a secret: THE very best value in baseball is a prospect that pans out. They are cheap and you get them for a long time. So yeah, there’s a good chance that Chris Archer will never be Matt Garza. But if Chris Archer DOES become Matt Garza, then he will be much much more valuable than Garza is now because you lots of marginal value in from those cost-controlled years. That’s why prospects are valuable: really great teams (yes, even the Yankees) get elite value for cheap from players they develop. That’s what is called a “core”. Then you supplement your core with trades and free agents and, bam, you have a championship type team.
Fire John Mozeliak
by purple_haze on Jan 8, 2011 5:52 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
The lottery
anology ins’t apt, because some people are much, much better at picking lottery numbers than others. Prospects aren’t lottery tickets, they are investments with incomplete information.
I guess a better analogy is that prospects are like stocks—if you have someone really good at picking stocks (like, say, the Rays GM), then putting your savings there is a good call. If your stock picker sucks, then you are throwing your money away. Either way you don’t know how good an investment you made until you see the return, it’s all based on incomplete information.
I think us trading 6 years of a prospect whose ceiling is Garza, and whose ability to succeed as a starter was in question, for 3 years of a known quantity in Garza is a good big market move. The player I dislike losing the most in the trade, for us, is Chirinos, because we get a relative expensive terrible player in Koyie Hill in place of a cheap player with high upside in Chirinos.
DEJESUS!!!
You left out Lee & Guyer
This was a VERY expensive deal of trading 4 guys who are more likely than not to end up in the MLB some may only be bench players but again 4 guys two of which have huge upsides
who would under control for six years for one pretty good guy for 3 years.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 10:35 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
This MAY be accurate
but we do not know. We do know that Garza is a proven top-of-the-rotation starter in the NL Central, and recently AL ALCS MVP.
Also, you may not understand, perhaps, that the Cubs not only favored Trey McNutt more than Archer, but believes that they have many more prospects up and coming equal to what they gave up.
A few years ago Garza was a mere prospect
Every player was a prospect, what separates teams is the ability to draft , develop and use prospects. The Cubs got the point where they had an excellent farm system and just
badly depleted it for one player who is good but NOT a a game changer. Baseball guys who know their stuff have all said the Cubs overpaid, the only disagreement is that a few them think it might have been worth overpaying but the vast majority think it was a bad deal made out of desperation. For once it looked like the Cubs might have a plan for the future but as usual it is just make a move now and don’t worry about the consequences in a year or two.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry, do not agree...
The Cubs got the point where they had an excellent farm system and just
badly depleted it for one player …
This just is not accurate. “Badly” depleted is grossly overstated. There are plenty of “baseball guys” who “know their stuff”, who disagree that they did not “overpay” based on what is known today. You, then, are not acknowledging what are exciting prospects that still are with the Cubs. You may wish to read up on some of the A, and AA kids coming up, and several potential nice players on the AAA team.
When you trade 3 of your top 10 including #1
You have seriously depleted your system. The Cubs have good players left but they are now really under the gun for them to make it. They no longer have major trading chips for another trade they are likely to need for next year so if guys in the system don’t move up fast they have gaping holes. I find it kind of funny that on the one hand people say Archer & Lee were overated, far from a sure thing etc, but hey don’t worry we have plenty of great stuff left anyway in our farm system.
Please point me to one non Chicago writer(established baseball person not blogger) who thinks the Cubs did not overpay, even those who think it was a good deal think the Cubs overpaid.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That's misleading though
According to many, we gave up 3 of our top 10 prospects. I would make the claim that we gave up only 2 sure-fire top 10 prospects, as all the guys from 7-15 in our system could have been rearranged in almost any order. B-Jax, Archer, McNutt, Lee, Vitters, Carpenter were the top 6. After that, they are all too close to separate, IMO. The difference from
Guyer to someone like Matt Szczur or Reggie Golden isn’t much. Chirinos barely cracked my own personal top 20.
And yes, we definately still have the pieces for a major trade if need be. I think you are terribly underrating the strength of our farm: depth. B-Jax and McNutt alone could fetch a very nice player.
But stocks are not sure things either
no matter what, you’re always playing percentages. Almost any investment you make has a chance of turning out well. But investors can’t predict how their luck will turn out. They can only try and give themselves the best chance for success and then hope. The point is that the ability of the investor should be based on how well they acted based on what they knew, not how well their luck turned out.
Fire John Mozeliak
I like the trade.
Depth in starting pitching is a great bargaining chip at the trade deadline. My guess is someone gets moved soon, but maintaining 6-7 potential starters on the 40 man roster gives the Cubs flexibility as 2011 plays out.
I am sorry to see Archer and Lee gone, but this trade shows that the Cubs are trying to win NOW. Why is that not a good thing?
Carlos Silva lemonade: made from freshly squeezed Milton Bradley lemons. -- the Jim Hendry kook book.
That shows the Cubs are tyring to win now?
By signing Carlos Pena and acquiring a #3 starter when the Cubs don’t currently have a #1, tell me how that helps them compete with the Cards or the Reds or the Brewers for that matter.
Because the Cubs didn't really move the needle with this trade...
They still don’t have much more than a 5% chance of making the playoffs. The Brewers cleared their farm system, but they replaced two replacement level pitchers with two guys that project to be worth 8-10 WAR, which increases their chances from something like <5% to around 30-40%.
Sign Carl Pavano!!!
So Greinke is a lock? That decline in his #s from 2009 to 2010 could be a big problem.
Like many Cub fans, you are harder on our roster & moves than the other teams in the division (most on BCB give division rivals the benefit of the doubt on moves).
Cubs still have a fairly good farm system and are turning into a team that has a nice blend of veterans and youth. This is much better than the Cub teams of 2007-08, at least how I see it.
Cubs have pieces that can still be moved to help with weaknesses (or injuries) that appear in the first couple of months of the season. I have no reason to get down when the Cubs are still sitting at 0-0
I’ll take another round of Kool-Aid…
Carlos Silva lemonade: made from freshly squeezed Milton Bradley lemons. -- the Jim Hendry kook book.
Well... I have to hope that Archer turns out to be the next
Juan Cruz or Angel Guzman… and Lee turns out to be any number of failed Cubs position player prospects (there’s a long list of those).
But, with Tampa doing the scouting…. I’d say odds are those guys make impacts in the major leagues.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Why do we as fans wish mediocrity or complete failure
upon players that are traded away or leave via free agency. Chris Archer seems to be a good young kid, with great talent and I wish him a long and exceedingly productive career.
Because the only way to justify this trade
is if Archer and Lee either flame out or amount to very little. At least SackMan admits what most other supporters of the trade don’t
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
So let me get this straight...
…, we should root against the future prosperity of former prospects so Hendry and the Cubs organization won’t once again be proven foolish?
I did not say I was doing that
but I think it is implicit in the posts of many people saying Archer & Lee ( and Guyer and Chirinos) were overvalued, and probably won’t amount to anything while they try to justify the deal. Oh I am sure they will say , no I think it is a win win but if Archer and Lee make decent impact on the MLB then it is a HUGE loss to get one guy who is good but not great for 3 fairly pricey years Vs 2 guys plus who are dirt cheap for 3 years and cost controlled for six.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not a fortune teller neither are the
people that post on this site, so it’s just wishful thinking that they hope Archer doesn’t meet his potential. but I still do not understand those sentiments. Look at it from this view, no matter how you feel about these prospects, if they do pan out, they very well could make their way back to the Cubs via free agency and maybe one day help this organization win a world series.
A reason to hope Archer et al do well
is that when you make a trade like this and your prospects succeed, it makes your farm system look better the next time you make a trade like this.
There’s no reason for us to not cheer for Archer, Chirinos, Guyer, Lee and Fuld.
by Josh Timmers on Jan 8, 2011 12:53 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed
Not to mention that they are on the Rays, the perennial underdog in the AL Beast. They will always have my support.
I intend to cheer for all of them
but if you don’t think many of the people calling this a good trade and denigrating the talents of these guys are going to hope they do well you are being naive. I already have a reputation for following ex cubs too closely and caring too much for guys who are no longer Cubs, but too many here gloat when an ex Cub fails in the “aren’t we glad we got rid of him mode”. Obviously the futures of all these guys will be followed closely and I don’t see too many people here cheering if Archer becomes a good starter, Lee a starting SS and heck Sam Fuld shows he really is a good 5th OF.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions
What I think should happen
and what is going to happen have no relationship to each other.
However, if Matt Garza becomes a front-line starter for the Cubs, I don’t think people will be too upset no matter what the prospects do. Joe Carter had a heck of a career, but no one got angry because Rick Sutcliffe was so good for the Cubs.
On the other hand, that was before the internet.
If Garza becomes a front line starter the value of the deal
still depends on how all 4 prospects fair and how much Garza actually can contribute to the Cubs making the post season. If there is some miracle and everything goes right and the Cubs win a WS in the next 3 years for which Garza makes a season long contribution then yes people probably won’t care if Archer wins a Cy Young in 2015. However if Garza is merely a front line pitcher on a team that can’t compete in the coming years because it has too many holes and not enough money or prospects to fill them while Archer & Lee become decent major league players and Guyer & Chirinos are solid bench guys , the deal sucks even if Garza is pretty good.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 2:35 PM CST up reply actions
People got pretty upset
about Dontrelle Willis, despite the success of Matt Clement as a Cub.
I think the only way Cub fans don’t blast the trade is if the Cubs win a World Series with Garza playing a significant role, or if all the prospects sent over flame out.
DEJESUS!!!
It's one thing to get upset...
…over letting one get a way but it’s quite another thing to wish someone a career of mediocrity.
Mel Hall
I actually thought that Mel Hall was going to be the best guy in that deal.
2011 - The 103rd time is the charm.
I guess I am a little naive in hoping my fellow
Cub fan would having nothing but well wishes for departing prospects.
I think that plays a role...
…but most of these prospects are already by other teams as much as they were by the organization that drafted them as an amateur, so they pretty much know what they’re getting into.
my feeling is that the better our prospects do for other teams, the more
teams will want to trade with us. I hope we get what we want out of this trade with the Rays and I hope the Rays are happy.
I am not one who hopes our traded prospects fail. I want teams stepping up to take what we have to offer.
Carlos Silva lemonade: made from freshly squeezed Milton Bradley lemons. -- the Jim Hendry kook book.
BTW, what is there to admit...
…I’m not a supporter of this trade and it’s certainly no skin off of my nose if these prospects pan out. It’s Hendry that has to answer for that.
that's actually not "the only way to justify this trade"
If Matt Garza pitches on a Cubs team that wins the World Series, I don’t care if Archer, Lee & Fuld become HOF’ers.
by SouthWabashSoul on Jan 8, 2011 9:40 PM CST up reply actions
Please....
If Felix Pie or Corey Patterson became exciting all-star players after leaving the Cubs, you would be pretty frustrated that the Cubs got rid of them.
If Lou Brock doesn’t blossom into a hall of fame player, nobody even remembers that trade.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Frustration, not at them,
Frustration at the Cubs organization and more specifically Jim Hendry. I’ve always checked for updates on ex-cubs hoping their careers pan out. Would it have made you feel better as a fan if Brock had not become a HoF player?
I loved this Josh
I think one thing many people do not realize, is that the Cubs from all accounts had a choice of flipping McNutt or Archer. The Cubs, based on control + heat, chose to hang on to Trey McNutt.
That speaks to the current Wilken-produced depth.
It is a far cry from the status quo when it comes to the Cubs prospects in years past.
The minors are stocked with promising pitchers and other position players. Taking the calculated risk under these conditions are plausible.
The only caveat in my mind, as I have mentioned yesterday, is that in Hendry’s mind, apparently he believes the Cubs are only a “move or two” away from a Division or Wild Card spot.
I Don’t buy this and felt that letting the top prospects improve, would only bring more value going into next year when the team will also have some $$ to spend.
Like others have said, where does this bring the team? Fighting it out for 3rd place?
To do much better, everything would have to lay out perfectly, and we all know the prospect of that in the last few years!
I'm not a big fan of this trade, however...
…the bigger calculated risk is allowing some of these high value prospects more time in the organization only to see them regress or even get hurt. I just question the timing of the trade, it really seems as though this is a half-hearted rebuild on the fly to compete for next year, when we should be looking at a 2-3 year complete revamp.
Thanks Josh for the great article...
Being an out of market Cubs fan I didn’t really know too much about the prospects we gave up. I might take some heat from this statement but I am for the trade. Just because we are rebuilding doesn’t mean we have to sit back and not make improvements to the team. We needed another solid starter in the rotation, Garza is only 27, and we got him for at least 3 years. We still have trade material on the team – Silva, Fukudome, and Gorz. , which we can fill another hole or replace some prospects with. And call me crazy, but I’m not sold on the “dominance” of the Reds, Cardinals, or Brewers.
I still think the Reds are the team to beat, but I think everyone is overrating the Cardinals and Brewers. Personally I’d rather see the Cubs trying to compete instead of laying in the cellar with the Pirates.
The Rangers offer for Garza
was Frank Francisco (paying most of his salary), Derek Holland, Engel Beltre and Robinson Chirinos, whom the Rangers would have to offer something to the Cubs for.
This according to Peter Gammons. So they were offering two major leaguers and two prospects as opposed to four prospects.
Seems like the Rays really wanted Chirinos.
So how does the Rangers' offer compare to the Cubs' offer?
I know the Rangers offered two major leaguers, but otherwise … ?
BTW, fantastic work, Josh.
Francisco and Holland
are major leaguers. Francisco could step in and be Tampa’s closer immediately, although he had mixed results doing that in Texas. Holland is a former top prospect who was decent in the majors and awesome in AAA last year.
Beltre is the Rangers #5 prospect. He’s a burner with limited power potential like Lee. Unlike Lee though, he’s an outfielder. Potentially a Michael Bourn type.
Chirinos is Chirinos. Don’t know what they’d offer us for him, but they thought they could get him. Maybe Chris Davis.
by Josh Timmers on Jan 8, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions
How in the world would the Rangers get the Cubs to trade Chirinos
so they could get Garza? As I posted before Chirinos may have little value to the Cubs but he was
a good trading chip for a lot of trades and Guyer had some value as well. This was a bad 4-1 trade
not just Lee & Archer.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
Ordinarily but they had to know they were competing against each other
and the Cubs knew the Rays wanted Chirinos. I mean it TX was really wiling to overpay it might be worth it but otherwise you don’t help them.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions
It was probably a fallback position.
If the Cubs knew they couldn’t get Garza, they could have at least gotten something for Chirinos.
You know, we’re all kind of looking past Chirinos in this deal. What if he has a good year as the Rays’ starting catcher? I know he was blocked by Soto, but still …
Big mistake in the Gammons article
Fuld majored in economics not psychology. Somebody needs to fact check.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:40 PM CST up reply actions
I doubt Fuld will either
At least he did not say he majored in Phys Ed.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jan 8, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions
Let's keep working with the Rangers
And see if we can land Chris Davis. They need a major league starter… and while they won’t get anyone of Garza’s talent, maybe Gorzo would fit in their rotation.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Could Zambrano be the next to be traded?
With all the noise the Red Sox made so far and with the Yanks getting left holding the baby on who they’ve coveted, is it possible they’d still want Z to pair with CC? Sorry if this has been discussed ad nauseum before, I’ve not kept up with all the posts this winter.
"He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know. " Abraham Lincoln
That's what Larry Bowa was saying
on the MLB network last night: That this opens the way to trade the Big Z to the Yankees.
I don’t think Bowa has a clue as to what he’s talking about though.
Unless the Yankees are offering us Jesus Montero, I don’t know what they have that would interest us.
by Josh Timmers on Jan 8, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
He was awfully good
in the second half last year and Piniella is gone.
Just giving him away would be stupid, although I admit that there’s no way the Yankees are giving us Montero for him. The problem is that I look at the Yankees top prospects and other than Montero, there’s no one that really fits our needs.
The Yankees have a problem with Montero that we had with Chirinos, only times ten. Montero is a first baseman and Teixeira’s not going anywhere. They could DH him, but Posada has to play there for now.
Why don't the Cubs need a first baseman?
And how could there be no one in the entire Yankee org that fills a need? The Cubs major league squad projects to finish fourth in the NL Central – possibly sneaking into third or even second if other teams falter – and their minor league system is now one of the worst in baseball. Getting a couple B prospects and clearing $36 million would be godsend for this team.
Sign Carl Pavano!!!
oh sorry...
you would take Montero – I read that wrong. Yeah the Yanks aren’t giving him up. They could really use Z though.
Sign Carl Pavano!!!
You're right
They aren’t giving up Montero. But I’d gladly take Manny Banuelos off their hands. Or Gary Sanchez. Or Dellin Betances. I think Z could likely fetch one of those guys, given the price of Garza and Marcum who are very similar pitchers to Z, IMO. His contract would lessen the return, obviously, so i wouldn’t expect much more than one of those guys.
The Yanks are going to trade him
I’m betting. Just not for Zambrano. They offered him to the Mariners for Cliff Lee, a deal the Mariners should have taken.
If someone big is available at the trade deadline, I think the Yankees will offer Montero for him.
A possibility
I was merely agreeing that Montero would not be the return for Z. He definately could be traded for someone more valuable than Z, though.
It seems
like that would utlimately do nothing to make the team better, it would just circuitously unload a bunch of top prospects to drop the payroll.
Garza’s value as a pitcher is probably similar to Zs, so the rotation would have no net change, the payroll would drop, and we’d lose a bunch of valuable prospects.
If that’s what Ricketts wanted, that is REALLY scary. I’m a pretty big pessimist on Ricketts, but even I’d be surprised if he’d go to these lengths to drop payroll.
DEJESUS!!!
Why do so many on BCB bash the Cubs farm system?
The Cubs seem to be in the top half to top third of most groups that rate farm systems and I seem to recall that many of the Cub farm teams have made the play-offs the last couple of years.
It seems to me that the Cubs have quietly scouted well and built a good farm system. Whether Hendry has gotten the Cubs fair value for players he has traded and signed is a whole other discussion.
But in isolation, looking at the Cubs farm system, it seems to be a much better asset than it was a decade ago.
Carlos Silva lemonade: made from freshly squeezed Milton Bradley lemons. -- the Jim Hendry kook book.
Ricketts main goal
was to build this team from within, not build by trading away your #1 prospect and other fairly valuable pieces.
To me, this is a head-scratcher because the Cubs are still in the 3-4 range in their division.
"He's a great candidate," Ryan said. "If I hadn't made him drop in coverage so often on running backs, he might be the all-time sack leader. They call it zone blitzing nowadays. We called it, 'Richard, pick him up.'" - Buddy Ryan on Richard Dent's HOF chances.
Not to detail this trade at all...
But, when discussing building your team from within the system… a trade that involves your prospects for major league talent certainly fits the bill.
In the end, you’ve used your system to build your major league roster, instead of going into free agency to acquire talent.
The Yankees use their system better than most. They trade prospects who very seldom make impacts for other teams, and keep the right prospects, who end up playing in pinstripes for a long time.
The Rays scout and develop better than most teams, out of necessity, because of their payroll budget. I wish the Cubs would build their model like the Rays. They’ve produce better talent, keep payroll down… limit the need for regular ticket price increases, and still produce better profit margins than they do, because they can cut away that giant payroll.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Lee is the guy
I didn’t want to see traded. They’ve needed a lead-off hitter for an eternity, and they go and deal their best prospect for that position. With Castro moved to second, the middle infield defense would’ve been superb.
"He's a great candidate," Ryan said. "If I hadn't made him drop in coverage so often on running backs, he might be the all-time sack leader. They call it zone blitzing nowadays. We called it, 'Richard, pick him up.'" - Buddy Ryan on Richard Dent's HOF chances.
LHP Zachary Rosscup is the pitcher we're getting back, according to Muskat
anyone confirm that and/or know anything about him?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Nothing other than his stats
He was a left-hander (some reports have him as a righty, but milb.com lists him as a lefty) and his stats in the New York-Penn League were good.
On the other hand, he was a 28th round draft pick and a 22 year old in the NYP League. He’ll be a 23 year old in Peoria next year.
Pretty close to “no one of significance.” Might have a small chance of being a productive player.
See below from St Pete times...
Rosscup, 22, split the 2010 season between the Gulf Coast League Rays (Rookie) and Hudson Valley (Short-Season A). He went a combined 3-1 with a 2.64 ERA (44.1-IP, 13-ER) in 12 appearances (eight starts). The southpaw was selected by the Rays in the 28th round of the 2009 June Draft.
Dallas Green!

by 























