The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #92 Larry Jackson
This is another in an update to BCB's Top 100 Cubs series, originally posted in 2006. This profile was written by Mike Bojanowski, BCB's cartoonist.
Larry Jackson is a fine representation of the starting pitchers of his era. Though well within living memory, it’s a type that now seems as distant as dead balls and webless gloves. He piled up games, innings, and decisions with clockwork regularity. He is also a classic example of a pitcher who toils for drudging teams, receiving little statistical flash or reward. He delivered three superb seasons for plodding Cubs nines during the mid 1960s; seasons that, pitched for an elite team, would have conferred major stardom.
Lawrence Curtis Jackson was born in Nampa, Idaho, near Boise, June 2, 1931, he remained a local boy all his life. Signed out of college by St. Louis, he made his pro mark spectacularly in 1952, his second season, leading Fresno to the California League pennant with a 28-4 record and 351 strikeouts. He rose steadily through the minors, debuting with the Cardinals in 1955.
Jackson divided his time between starting and relieving until 1959, when he became a starter full-time. A tall right-hander, his slider was his out pitch. His best year in St. Louis was 1960, an 18-13 record, leading the league in starts and innings pitched. He missed the beginning of the 1961 season, after his jaw was broken in a spring training game by a shard off the shattered bat of Duke Snider; nothing is new under the sun. On October 17, 1962, in one of the meaty trades so common in that era, Jackson was dealt to the Cubs, with Lindy McDaniel and Jim Schaeffer; in exchange for George Altman, Don Cardwell, and Moe Thacker.
Jackson’s first season with the Cubs is a sort that modern stat gurus love, a classic hard-luck story, revealed by a closer look at the figures. His won-loss, then as now the first thing anyone looks at, was 14-18, for a seventh place team. But his ERA was a sparkling 2.55. The Cubs scored all of 29 runs in his 18 losses, and were shutout four times, three of those 1-0. Jackson suffered eight one-run defeats in all. His only real luck that year came in the All-Star Game, the fourth of his five appearances in the midsummer classic. Though allowing two runs, tying the game, he earned the victory as the NL retook the lead immediately after his departure.
Jackson’s 1964 season is one of the most remarkable Cubs pitching years of its era; a first-class talent having the year of his life, while receiving nearly all the breaks that had always eluded him. His 24 victories (24-11, for a 76-86 8th place club), led both leagues, and were the most by a Cub since Charlie Root’s 26 in 1927. He threw 19 complete games and 297 innings, with an ERA of 3.14. In the Cy Young Award voting that year, Jackson finished second to the Angels’ Dean Chance, and ahead of Sandy Koufax. (Separate CYAs for each league were not begun until 1967. Also, the voting in ‘64 was one vote per writer). It is readily apparent that, had there been an NL award, Jackson would have won handily.
On June 30, facing Cincinnati at Wrigley, Jackson pitched the game of his life, and came within an ace of what passes for baseball immortality. As so often seems to happen in such cases, the Reds starter, Joey Jay, was also splendid, allowing two hits and one run. But Jackson was not only perfect, but utterly routine, setting down the side placidly until Pete Rose led off the seventh inning with a clean ground single precisely over the second base bag, the only Reds baserunner that day. I saw that game in person, the first Cubs game I retain in my memory. In my mind’s eye, I can still see that ball dribble into center field. This nearly forgotten jewel was played before a mob of 8,380 paid spectators, in an elapsed time of one hour, forty minutes.
Jackson’s last full Cubs season, 1965, returned to accustomed form, he was 14-21, but with four shutouts and an ERA of 3.85. He became the first NL pitcher since 1952 to win, and then lose, twenty games in consecutive seasons.
Jackson lost his first two starts in ‘66, then was involved in one of the greatest trades in Cubs history, sent with Bob Buhl to the Phillies; in exchange for Fergie Jenkins, Adolfo Phillips, and John Herrnstein. Jackson gave the Phils three steady seasons, leading the league with five shutouts the rest of 1966. On June 20, 1967, three years almost to the day after his masterpiece at Wrigley, he one-hit the Mets at Connnie Mack Stadium (the Mets’ starter that day was Bob Hendley, yet again the victim of a low-hit game).
Jackson was taken by the Montreal Expos in the expansion draft of 1968, but chose to retire, at age thirty-seven. His career record stands at 194-183, his Cubs record, 52-52, for a team whose winning percentage was .465 during his tenure. The 194 wins are the most by an NL righthander (since 1900) who did not play for a first-place team. He won a minimum of thirteen games each of his last twelve seasons.
Also remarkable is his fielding prowess, four times he led the league in fielding percentage, i.e., most chances in an errorless season. He set a record for such things in 1964, handling 109 chances without an error, breaking a mark set by the Cubs’ Mordecai Brown in 1908. Randy Jones of the Padres would break Jackson’s mark.
Larry returned to Idaho, and became a prominent, influential citizen and businessman. He entered politics, serving four terms in the Idaho legislature, and becoming chairman of the state Republican Party. He tried for the governorship in 1978, but failed to win the GOP nomination.
Jackson died of cancer, in Boise, August 28, 1990, age fifty-nine.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks, Al. Larry was a fine pitcher playing for a second division team.
He was also part of two good trades for the Cubs, both when he came from St. Louis and when he went to Philly.
Baseball is too much of a sport to be a business and too much of a business to be a sport.
William Wrigley Jr
by bubbamike the one and only on Jan 9, 2011 3:40 PM CST reply actions
Funny
For the most part all I remembered was the trade that sent Jenkins to the Cubs. However he actually had a decent career. 194 wins is nothing to be shamed of.
Hands down, the best acquisition of the pre-Leo Wrigley-Holland era...
When the trade was announced, fan and media response was near-unanimous: another ridiculous move by the Cubs. Imagine, giving away Don Cardwell and George Altman for a mediocre performer like Larry Jackson and a 27-year old has-been starter/reliever like Lindy McDaniel.
But as we know, Larry and Lindy, along with Dick Ellsworth, Billy, and Ron, proved to be the keys to the ill-fated First Cubs Renaissance of 1963 that finally ended the Terrible 20 Years of postwar futility at Wrigley Field. If only Leo had been in charge that year, the Cubs likely would have gone to the wire with the Dodgers, Cards, and Giants, with Durocher batting Lou Brock at leadoff to let him produce for the Cubs as he would do for the Cards from ‘64-’79.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
I always wondered why Jackson retired just short of 200 wins.
His last year, he was 13-17, 2.77 for a team that only won 76 games. He had a 4.8 WAR.
He would have been 38, but it’s hard to imagine a modern player coming that close to a milestone and leaving it.
Probably because...
… in the 1960s, milestones like that weren’t as big a deal as they are now.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Hey Al
A fun winter diversion for next year might be the 10 best and worst trades in Cubs history. The Jackson trade to Philly would have to be #1 or #2 based on your point of view.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Actually
I think the Card trade was the forerunner of the infamous Brock deal. St.L. was searching for an OFer from the Cubs & felt Altman was the guy, based on his previous seasons with the Cubs. However, they tried to alter his swing to take advantage of the short porch in old Sportsman park, and ruined his swing. The Cubs, wound up with a steal as McDaniel also gave them a solid closer. When the Cards came calling again in ’64 the Cubs must have thought they could do it again, with Brock for Broglio. I seem to recall that I read somewhere, that had they made the move a little earlier, they may have been able to make a deal with Brock an erratic young player, for Gibson, another erratic young player. Wonder how that might have changed history!
"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields
Wow.
I never heard that, but it’s possible. Broglio was actually better than Gibson in 1963; had Gibson come to the Cubs, maybe the Cubs would have won a couple of pennants in the mid 60s and the Cardinals wouldn’t.
Oh, well.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Your comment on the Cubs looking for a repeat of their success with the Altman-Jackson deal makes sense,
but I don’t think the Cards considered trading Gibson in ’64. After all, despite his immense potential, and even though he was already 23 when they signed him in ’58, they still avoided rushing him into a starting role until ’61. By ’62, he was an All-Star, and by ’64 clearly the Cards stopper.
If a Gibson-for-Brock deal had taken place, Bing Devine and Johnny Keane likely would have been run out of St. Louis a couple of months earlier than what actually occurred that August when Gussie Busch fired Devine and put Keane on notice.
IIRC, the Phillies and Pirates also were trying pry Brock away from the Cubs at the time. Perhaps someone on this blog has knowledge of what those teams were offering – maybe Briggs, Wise, Phillips, or Fergie?
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Rumor
Never could confirm anything, of course, but I’d heard that until the Birds found Broglio to be damaged goods, they valued him more highly that Gibby at the time, and would not have given up another (like Jackson) known commoddity for a young guy (Brock) yet established. Broglio was fairly young, and had better control. Gibson’s detractors at the time thought he was a guy who just threw fastballs because he couldn’t get anything else over. Hence the idea of trading two guys, still with un fulfilled potential for each other. Oh what might have been. (Gibby- Jenkins- Hands- Holtzman) If they couldn’t win a pennant with that, then maybe we could have really believed in the curse! (LOL)
"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields
Jackson was just barely before my time, so I have no memories of him
but I love the stories about ex-Cubs, and I enjoy these articles much more than I enjoy reading the arguments about who should be backup catcher. I’m ready for Top Cubs #101-200. If you write it, I will read it.
ask not what the Cubs can do for you - ask what you can do for the Cubs.
#101-200...
… we could be getting into dangerous mediocrity by then.
I’ll see what other kind of history pieces we can do here.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
you are a great writer, and can surely find 3 paragraphs about Gene Hiser and Manny Alexander
just joking, but I for one really enjoy any history pieces you can dig up. Hell I dropped 10 bucks for the numbers book, and really liked it.
ask not what the Cubs can do for you - ask what you can do for the Cubs.
by holy mackeral on Jan 10, 2011 4:03 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for buying the book.
Glad you enjoyed it. Copies still available — link on the sidebar. (Shameless promotion.)
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Man, all the connections
Reading about Larry Jackson sure brought back some memories. Better days in some ways—a time when a kid could know just about all of the major leaguers by going to games, watching WGN, and studying baseball cards.
I was pretty unhappy when the Cubs traded Tony Taylor and Cal Neeman for Don Cardwell and Ed Bouchee. As a Little League 2B myself, I tried to imitate Tony’s steady work at bat and in the field. But then Don Cardwell started off with a no-hitter. I listened to that one on a transistor radio in my backyard. Moose Moryn made a nice catch to end it, but George Altman also made a nice catch in the 9th. My brother and I yelled when it was over. My mother came out to see if we were still alive. When she, a good Cubs fan, heard why yelled, she joined the celebration.
Then, a couple of years later, Cardwell and Altman went to the Cards for Larry Jackson. Cardwell hung on for many years and even won a few for that 1969 New York National League team that shall not be named. Altman came back to the Cubs for a couple of years before finishing a good career in Japan. And Jackson turned out to be a nice, steady guy. Lots of innings, fielded his position, hit a little.
Then Jackson and Buhl the Mule turned into Fergie and Adolfo Phillips. Adolfo gave us a reasonably good couple of years in CF. And Fergie turned out to be one for the ages.
Nice to think about those guys again. Watching them gave me was a lot of fun.
Can you imagine how much Larry Jackson
would command salary-wise today? He probably left the game when he did because he needed to go make some money…..
Win 20, lose 20. You have to be a pretty damn good pitcher to do both, as Ellsworth did — and these two guys I certainly remember vividly….
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Jan 10, 2011 3:02 PM CST reply actions
Larry Jackson ranks higher
In Bill James’ list of top 100 pitchers (#89 in the New Abstract) than he does in the top 100 Cubs list. Though that ranking on the pitcher’s list is ambitious.
The 89th best pitcher of all time?
Wow, I wouldn’t have gone that far.
The reason he doesn’t rank higher on the Cubs list is that he was only a Cub for a little more than three seasons. One of those seasons was spectacular, though.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Just saw this
Larry Jackson was a heart and souler. He was as fine a pitcher as the Cubs had in that era. I only have fond memories of Larry.
by If we only had Hubbs on Jan 11, 2011 10:54 AM CST reply actions

by 




















