Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

The Case For The Cubs Signing Mark Buehrle

Starting pitcher Mark Buehrle of the Chicago White Sox delivers the ball against the Toronto Blue Jays at U.S. Cellular Field in Chicago, Illinois.  (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

This tweet from Fox Sports' Jon Morosi has me intrigued:

#Cubs have had multiple discussions with the agent for Mark Buehrle, source says.
Nov 16 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

 

Not just "a" discussion, but "multiple" discussions. This would seem to me to indicate that Theo & Jed are seriously interested in Buehrle.

I would be, too. Follow me past the jump to find out why.

Star-divide

Mark Buehrle has been one of the most consistent pitchers in the American League for the last decade. He doesn't get hurt. He doesn't miss starts -- he's started at least 30 games for the last 11 seasons. Here is a list of all the other pitchers in baseball who have accomplished that feat:


Yes, that's right. Nobody. Buehrle is the only pitcher in baseball who's done that. He no longer strikes out a lot of hitters -- 4.8 per nine innings in 2011 -- but then, he never really did. His career high in K rate is 6.1 per nine. He doesn't walk people -- two per nine innings in 2011, exactly on his career rate -- and he doesn't give up home runs (21 in 2011, with his home park being a launching pad).

I admit, there are caveats. Buehrle has a lot of miles on his left arm; his 2,476 innings are the most of any pitcher who debuted in 2000 or later. But they're fairly gentle miles, as Buehrle is not a hard thrower. Someone here (Josh, I think) compared him to Jamie Moyer, and I think that's accurate. The Cubs, under Jim Hendry's leadership, always liked hard-throwing pitchers better than soft-tossing control guys. Perhaps it's time to get a pitcher on the staff who can simply pile up innings and save the bullpen. Buehrle threw at least six innings in 26 of his 31 starts in 2011. He's a fast worker -- in 2005 he threw a CG win in an hour and 39 minutes -- and that can only help the defense behind him. He's lefthanded and the Cubs could use a LH starter.

He's going to be 33 years old in March, and I know that Theo went on record in his introductory news conference as saying he didn't want to pay for "past performance". In the case of Buehrle, though, since he seems durable, I think you could get four good years out of him.

Buehrle just finished a four-year, $56 million deal with the White Sox. You'd probably want to pay somewhat less than that per year, given his age. That AAV would be what Ryan Dempster is getting this year ($14 million) and though Buehrle might be worth that in 2012, he might not be in future years. Perhaps the Cubs could offer incentives based on starts and innings, something Buehrle could easily make if healthy.

Regarding comments Buehrle has made in the past regarding the Cubs, and his desire to pitch for his hometown Cardinals, I believe all of that is pretty much pandering to whatever audience he was talking to at the time. If the Cubs made him an offer he felt was the best one out there and he wanted to work for Theo and Jed and whatever manager they hire, I assume he'd take it. As JJ Stankevitz pointed out at CSNChicago.com:

Outside of enraging some White Sox fans, the Cubs make a ton of sense for Buehrle. He'd get to stay in Chicago, make multiple trips a year to his native St. Louis, pitch in a lesser hitter's league and get to hit more than a handful of times a year.

I don't know about the hitting part -- Buehrle is 5-for-47 lifetime -- but the rest of it makes a great deal of sense. I'd very much like to see the Cubs sign Buehrle.

And then there's this (you might want to mute your speakers while you're watching it):

Solid pitching. Great defense. Good guy, from everything I've heard. Go for it, Theo & Jed.

Comment 310 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If the money's right, you consider anyone who can help the team win

But, a small point I’d like to make: the White Sox/Cardinals business isn’t wholly a non-issue. If Buehrle came over, and got off to a slow start, he’d probably be on a shorter leash with fans than other players who don’t have his background. Maybe the fan reaction doesn’t matter, but if the fans hate you, it certainly can’t help get your season turned around.

Bleacher Nation - Cubs Rumors and News

by Brett Taylor on Nov 16, 2011 10:03 AM CST reply actions  

I agree with this.

And I would not overpay for Buehrle. But at the right price, he is an excellent fit.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't you think Buehrle would want to go to somewhere he can win in the next couple years?

And don’t you think the Cubs may want to seriously save some money in 12 and 13 and maybe compete for real in 14?

"I'm not a broadcaster! I'm me!"--Ron Santo

by chilango2 on Nov 16, 2011 10:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Those are legitimate questions.

Only Buehrle can answer them.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

You're suggesting the Cubs give up on the next two years?

You can’t do that with this franchise. If you do, you will alienate the casual fanbase to the point where revenue would drop… and then what do you do?

You have to at least try to compete every single year.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle is a name that would draw fans.

But this is a tough situation. If the Cubs paid Buehrle $14 million in 2012, they wouldn’t have a ton of money to fill other needs. Even if the Cubs could scrape together enough money to sign Buehrle and Fielder (presumably on backloaded deals) there’s a gaping hole at third and the outfield isn’t close to good enough.

Unless I can get a great deal for Buehrle, I’d rather spend money on Prince Fielder, who’s 27, more of a draw and somebody who has a better chance of still being in peak form in 2014-15 than Buehrle.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

You really think he would draw fans?

He may be a fan favorite of White Sox fans, but I doubt Cubs fans would flock to Wrigley because he was pitching.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I tend to agree with you.

However, I disagree with elgato. I’d much rather spend money on pitching than bust the budget on Fielder.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

If Buehrle were 27, I would go all in for him.

But 33? Eeeh …

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

As noted below

… I don’t think 33 for a pitcher of Buehrle’s type is old.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

That's a big gamble, depending on the price.

I agree that this is smarter than signing a 33-year-old pitcher who depends on velocity. Still …

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

I know.

I’m saying that the interest he’s getting and the thin free agent market might mean that a bargain for Buehrle is wishful thinking.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

That's possible.

If Theo can talk him down to 3 years, $30 million, then I’d be all about it …

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

For a decent price

he would be a good, solid pitcher. Lord knows the Cubs really need good pitching (and not going 9 innings of batting practice).

He was solid for the White Sox, did some great things like the perfect game and that play he made during an opening game (2011? 2010?). His win losses seem about average, not as good as you’d want, but not terrible. He was very well liked on the Southside.

And I never thought about that- he hasn’t really been injured, unlike Peavy.

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

He's the unPV.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Just wondering what you would define as overpayment.


If the Cubs still have a chance, no matter how small, it’s still Go Cubs, damn the math and pass the KoolAid. I'm a Sheeple and proud of it!
Spelling and grammar errors are included for creative and artistic reasons.

by eths on Nov 17, 2011 6:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Well, I'm with EG on Fielder.

Guys like that don’t hit the FA market every year. It’s unfortunate that the Cubs need pitching and that there’s little available, but as Theo said in his press conference, if it comes down to helping the team short term vs. long term, then he’ll choose long term.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Fielder's defense is the big drawback.

Part of me wouldn’t mind if the Cubs decided to sign Reyes and move Castro to third. But I don’t see that happening.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I get the "Castro to 3B" business.

His arm’s quite erratic.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh, I know.

There just aren’t any very good solutions.

1) Fielder has a bad body and is bad defensively
2) Pujols is older and will take a ton of money
3) Buehrle is old and has a lot of suitors
4) Reyes would supplant Castro
5) Wilson will get badly overpaid.
6) The rest of the options are equally problematic.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't understand why teams don't wait out free agents.

Instead, they get into bidding wars when they don’t have to.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Not necessarily

… because free agents would get nervous about not having a team to go to.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

If more teams did what you suggested a lot more teams would be nervous getting closer to ST.

I think a lot of teams try to get a reasonable deal early so they can further shape their roster the closer it gets to ST. If you start to wait too long, you may lose out on that player and then you scramble for a lesser more expensive player to cover that position. Then that would make it harder to fill other needs on top of that.

by ubercubsfan on Nov 16, 2011 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't forget the video game rosters

The more players that sign before the end of December to more “correct” the rosters are when the new MLB games come out in the spring.

by timmyfan on Nov 16, 2011 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you really think that?

You don’t think that Pujols, Reyes and Fielder hold all of the cards?

Nervous? Come on.

Come on Lisa, I'm trying to impress people here. You don't win friends with salad. ~ Homer J. Simpson

by TheBeerBaron on Nov 17, 2011 6:43 PM CST up reply actions  

That's essentially collusion, isn't it?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 11:14 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Well..

… kind of, I guess.

The more teams jump on a free agent early, the higher the price will be, though.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Sure.

That’s why I’ve been a big proponent of bargain hunting late in the offseason. But Buehrle will be signed by early 2012, at the latest.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

you know, for all the crap that fantasy baseball gets around here...

this sub-thread is a very accurate depiction of the draft-day mentality on display in living rooms, man-caves and online sites everywhere in March and April.

Life imitating fantasy – whodathunkit?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 16, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Why?

They don’t want to look bad and miss out on an opportunity even though it’s a case of fools rush in.

Yeah, Pujols won’t be worth whatever contract he’s given, just like the high price the Rangers were paying for A-Rod.

“Buehrle is old and has a lot of suitors”
That can be read a few ways…

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Two years with some sort of mutual vesting/opt-out for the 3rd/4th

I think he has a solid chance to be a “Hall of the Extremely Excellent” pitcher and pick up another 80 wins over the next 6-7 years and get into the 240 win range.

But… with the exception of Jack Morris, his comps through his current age on B-R are not guys who did particularly well as starters past the age of 32. Many of his comps had some sort of injury right about now. The question to me is whether those types of injuries have better recover rates today.

While I agree with Al that the team is too popular to ever rebuild, I’m not sure they can win in 2014 with Buehrle as a overpriced declining #5 starter who may only give them 22-23 starts and can’t move.

It's a simple question, Doctor: would you eat the moon if it were made of ribs??

by Invalid User on Nov 16, 2011 1:07 PM CST up reply actions  

To a point, I do.

Put it this way — he’ll bring more people to Wrigley than Paul Maholm. Still, I don’t think I’d sign Buehrle unless the price is extremely right. I won’t be upset if he ends up a Cub — as I said, he’s been a favorite of mine — but he seems like someone you sign as a No. 2-3 starter if you feel like you’re a pitcher away from real contention.

Buehrle, in a way, is the equivalent of Aramis Ramirez. Good players veteran who probably will be too expensive and too old for a team that is a couple years away.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I disagree on your comparison.

Ramirez is someone who’s been hurt quite a bit. As he gets older, that could happen more often.

Buehrle has never been injured. The type of pitcher he is, that means he’s likely to stay healthy through the term of a four-year deal.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

I suppose he'll bring more people to Wrigley than Maholm.

I just don’t see it being large enough to be a factor. It’d be like when Ted Lilly was signed.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle is a bigger deal in Chicago than Lilly was in 2007.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Slightly.

But factor in the folks who would be anti-Buerhle because he spent his career with the White Sox and I’m not sure there would be a big difference. I just think signing him with the idea that an extra benefit would be that he’d be a draw is overstated.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

You might be right.

But the anti-Buehrle sentiment goes away the second he signs with the Cubs.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle is a ball player

Can’t recall him saying anti cubs comments. And Edmonds proved if you can produce, nobody cares about your past

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

I was going to mention Dennis Rodman, but your example is probably more apt

I think Buehrle might be too expensive when all is said and done, but there’s no reason to not welcome him with open arms if we get him reasonably…

by MarchHare on Nov 16, 2011 6:48 PM CST up reply actions  

For most, yes.

But every Cub fan certainly isn’t rational.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Has any Sox player been stoking the flames of hate

from Cubs fans besides AJ Piercynzski and Ozzie Guillen? Of course everyone is playing to win not playing for fun, but I don’t recall Konerko, Thome, Thomas, Buehrle, Danks, or any of the other players trash talking the Cubs.

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

the league is all about pitching now

i dont see the cubs going after fielder or Albert

THEOOOOOOOOOOO to the rescue

by southsidecubbiefan on Nov 17, 2011 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Thank you!

"I'm not a broadcaster! I'm me!"--Ron Santo

by chilango2 on Nov 16, 2011 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

We were 20 games below this year.

It’s nearly impossible to alienate a fanbase this huge and this iconic and with such a large draw—its field. And I don’t care about alienating the bandwagon fan; they’ll come back when we are winning. It’s worth a few years of development and productive measures to be significantly better in 2013 or 2014.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Nov 16, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

There's a middleground.

Signing a 33-year-old pitcher (regardless of Jamie Moyer comps) to a 4-year, $56 million deal really doesn’t fit. Now, signing a 27-year-old first baseman who will be good now and in 2013-14 …

I don’t think the Cubs would be best served by doing nothing this offseason, essentially bringing back the 2011 team (minus Ramirez). THAT could hurt ticket sales.

But signing early-to-mid 30s players to long-term deals? No thanks.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree with that.

I just don’t like crippling the team with another $50M for a guy that’s gonna decline.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Nov 16, 2011 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess what I don't get is the whole....

….not alienating the fanbase by half-competing.

I guess what I am trying to say is that do you think 70-75 win seasons is really going to make the casual fan base happy? Is being a slightly below .500 team and not making the playoffs really any better than winning 65-70 games and still not making the playoffs?

I think what most of the 2014 people are trying to say is let’s put this team in the best possible position to really push for it all when we are in the best possible position to win it all. This means not blowing money on guys that won’t have a real impact on the team when its not realistically ready to compete for a championship(2012 and 2013). The suggestion is that Buehrle might be one of those guys.

by mmontice on Nov 16, 2011 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's the key distinction:

It’s pretty easy to project when a team will be really bad — like 2011 Astros bad. The Cubs should avoid that path, because it hurts advanced ticket sales, walkups and general interest.

What the Cubs need to do is walk the line between appearing dead on arrival in spring training and going for a 2007-style junk food high. The Cubs need to at least field a team that’s on the fringe of contention for part of the season.

That’s why, I think, signing Fielder makes more sense than signing Buehrle (obviously, depending on the terms). Buehrle is a great guy and a good pitcher, but giving a 4-year deal to a 33-year-old pitcher when fringe contention is all you can hope for in the first year of the deal doesn’t make a ton of sense. Paying a 27-year-old to help achieve fringe contention in 2012 AND help with the rest of the rebuilt roster in 2013 and beyond makes more sense.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 12:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Part of alienating the fanbase is the type of team taking the field.

A below .500 team filled with young prospects who are the building blocks of the future is way better than what we saw last year. Unfortunately, the Cubs didn’t have top notch young guys other than Castro, so what we saw absolutely alienated the fanbase. The team was simply filled with guys either running in place or walking backwards. Cubs fans were fed up with guys like Soriano and Zambrano, knew players like Byrd and Fukudome weren’t going to get any better, and knew big FA acquisition Pena wasn’t going to turn this team around. There were just too few building blocks. Cubs fans weren’t watching a team struggle yet grow; they watched a team stink and get worse.

The Cubs still don’t have the prospects to fill in the holes. So as long as you don’t hurt the long term competitiveness of the team, you sign guys that are better than in house options and hope for the best. Anything is possible, albeit unlikely.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I feel like giving Buehrle....

….a 4/$48M contract is most likely not in the best long term competitive interest of the team.

Prince at 5/$125M might be the same. The problem with that contract is that he would have to put up career numbers every year to make that contract worth it. It’s a scary proposition with a guy that weighs 270-290 lbs. And that contract is realistic. Its what Howard got a few years ago.

Same could said for CJ Wilson.

by mmontice on Nov 16, 2011 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Every contract isn't going to work out perfectly.

So when it comes to overpaying, you make sure you overpay elite players. I think Prince is one of those guys. I think some of the weight issues are overblown, especially when everyone just wants to scream “MO VAUGHN!” at every mention of his name.

That being said, if he could be had for 5/125, I think the Brewers would just re-sign him.

I think Buerhle for four years might be a risk worth taking. I’m kind of torn on the whole thing. No way on CJ Wilson though. Someone’s gonna overpay bad for him.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Prince is talking

about $200 million. He might not get that, but there is no way he’s signing for 5/$125M. The Brewers would re-sign him for that price.

I’m for any deal that improves the team without crippling our payroll for future seasons.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I was using 5/$125M as the minimum,

but him at 7/$175 is even better. That has an even better chance kill a team.

I agree that some of the weight issues are overblown, but then again, heavy guys often decline rapidly, whether through injury or skill reduction. Is that worth the chance at that price?

by mmontice on Nov 16, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

this sentiment is thrown around a lot

without stating what the poster believes is “over-paying”. For example I’d be comfortable with a 3-33 contract for Buehrle, but going something like 4-48 would seem like overpaying from my vantage point.

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 16, 2011 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Three and a mutual option?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

what price though?

would you be willing to go

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 16, 2011 12:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

You say 3/33 is OK, but 4/48 is not — what about 3/35 and a vesting option at 12, with a $2m buyout?

That way, if he’s good at 37, you pay him. If not, it’s not that expensive.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm asking for your opinion

my opinion is that 3/33 is stretching the bounds of something i’m ok with.

I’m wondering what you think of as over-paying when you reference it above. Not trying to be antagonistic, more trying to understand what your idea of an appropriate price for Buehrle is.

I happen to think the price it will take to get him is something that will leave me feeling a bit uncomfortable with the deal

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 16, 2011 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

You might be right.

3/33 is quite a bit lower AAV than Dempster is getting this year, for example. I don’t think that would be overpaying.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 3:46 PM CST up reply actions  

so it sounds like

you’d define is as same aav as dempster but with 3 years and an option for a 4th as your highest price point or as your desired price point? I hate to be repetitive but genuinely trying to understand what YOU think is the right range and what is too much, not what you think of what i think

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 17, 2011 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

He's great and whatever

I’m just sick at this other gossipy tweet:

What? John Wetteland didn’t answer the phone?

"I'm not a broadcaster! I'm me!"--Ron Santo

by chilango2 on Nov 16, 2011 10:06 AM CST reply actions  

I saw that one last night.

Couldn’t figure it out. Ponson hasn’t pitched since 2009 and hasn’t been any good since 2003.

Then I looked it up. Barry Praver is Ponson’s agent. Another one of Praver’s clients is Carlos Zambrano.

Wittenmyer was trying to be clever. As usual, he failed.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

That would put a bottom on your WAR,

at least

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Nov 16, 2011 10:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Beat me to it!

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

A perfect pitcher

for the dead ball era. And playing at the Field of Dreams.

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 2:38 PM CST up reply actions  

He got better!

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Nov 16, 2011 6:15 PM CST up reply actions  

He would make a great mascot for the Pirates

He’s not dead! He’s just resting, he’s just… pining for the fjords.

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 9:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought it was clever!

But I enjoyed doing the brief research to see who else Sidney Ponson’s agent represented.

by WiscCubsFan on Nov 16, 2011 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

This makes so much sense in a lot of ways.

Durable, innings eater, good guy, left handed. This should be our main target!

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.

by mrcubsfan on Nov 16, 2011 10:18 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Defense

I’m glad you briefly mentioned it on the bottom, but Buehrle owns multiple Gold Gloves. After seeing our defense from the pitcher spot on the field, he would help a lot. He could probably teach the kids on our team something too.

by airmidget1 on Nov 16, 2011 10:19 AM CST reply actions  

Or Garza

Never seen a pitcher that bad at defense. Yeesh

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Seems like a guy that’s consistent throughout his career. He could be worth 10-12M for a couple more years. His delivery is pretty fluid and doesn’t seem to put a lot of stress on his elbow or shoulder. He only throws the curve 10% of the time, too, but has 5 pitches in his repertoire.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Nov 16, 2011 10:19 AM CST reply actions  

Given the interest in Buehrle and the thin pitching market this offseason ...

I don’t really see how the Cubs wouldn’t end up overpaying. I suppose he could provide a hometown discount, but I don’t really see it happening. Usually, that only works for guys staying with the same team.

I’ve been a big Buehrle fan for years, and I’d love to see him pitch for the Cubs. But in the fourth year of any contract, he’ll be 37. Counting on somebody to be the next Jamie Moyer is pretty dangerous, considering that Moyer is an absolute anomaly.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:24 AM CST reply actions  

I hope we express some interest in Maholm

A quality lefty, who knows our division.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Nov 16, 2011 10:29 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Maholm would come pretty cheap.

If healthy, I’d consider that, too.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

We seem to do pretty well with Pittsburgh castoffs

I’d fully support going after Maholm.

The one thing I’ve learned from this season is you really need pitching depth more than anything. Maholm is young enough to rebound. Rodrigo Lopez/Ramon Ortiz/etc are not roads we should go down again. Sign Maholm and Buehrle/Chen/etc. You end up with this:

Garza
Dempster
Buehrle
Maholm
Cashner/Shark/Marshall/Someone else who surprises in camp

I’m assuming we trade Z. Stretch out whoever doesn’t win the Shark/Cashner battle and have them be a LR.

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

That Ramirez fellow

What’s his name

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Um

Where’s wells?

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Nov 18, 2011 3:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd -- I'm still on board with this.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd shoot for 2 signings like this

It would be as good as the Ted Lilly signing was. Can’t imagine he can keep up the 3+ WAR over the life of a contract, but it’s worth a shot.

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.

by IowaCubs- on Nov 16, 2011 10:33 AM CST reply actions  

Speaking of Lilly

… I’d investigate whether the Dodgers would be willing to deal him. I’d love to have him back — if LA would eat most of the contract.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Paging Easy Ed ...

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

You rang?

I see Al’s at it again. ; )

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 2:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Heh.

Say that pitcher is named Ted Jones and the Cubs could use a tough lefthander whose contract is being paid for by someone else.

You STILL don’t want him if he ever spent one day in blue pinstripes and then left?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope...

…I just don’t see the logic in back-tracking. He was here for what…4 years? How’d we do? Yep…move on.

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

No matter how many times you say crap like this, I never get used to it.

It’s just so incredibly nonsensical. We didn’t win the World Series with him on the roster, so we blame him.

Just….bizarre

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 3:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't.

He might be going more extreme than need be to be funny. But he’s been holding this stance for months.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Who's blaming him?

He was here…he was part of a team that made a run, and failed. Cubs traded him for Blake freakin’ DeWitt. They obviously were thru with Lilly. Why bring him back? It’s insane. If they traded him for a GOOD player, then I’d say they had a reason to trade him. They didn’t. He wasn’t in the “future plans” then. The team is rebuilding now. Why bring someone like that back? He’s a #5…at best. It appears we have a whole organization full of #5s. Let those guys pitch.

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 4:06 PM CST up reply actions  

You do realize it wasn't know DeWitt would suck.... right?

He did put up nearly a 2 WAR season at the age of 23, showing strong defensive ability.

He was a top 10 prospect of the Dodgers, I believe #7, and he was only 24 when we got him and under team control for a while.

Did it turn out to be a good move? No, but it wasn’t nearly as bad as you make it seem. It’s not like we threw Lilly away for someone with absolutely no promise. DeWitt simply hasn’t lived up to what we hoped he could do.

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, they were trading a player in the last few months of a contract

This wasn’t a “please god get him the hell of this team” It was a patented Jim Hendry miscalculation

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 8:26 PM CST up reply actions  

A whole organization of No. 5s?

Where were these guys while I was watching Doug Davis and Rodrigo Lopez all summer?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 5:20 PM CST up reply actions  

sort of a strange side to dig in on

given there’s a new front office making evaluations

you’re suggesting its impossible for the new front office to have liked a player the old front office got rid of and then try to bring him back? That seems strange

Note I’m not an advocate of re-acquiring Lilly, but digging your heels in on this debate isn’t something i understand the point of. It’s a different front office making different evaluations than the previous regime. There’s certainly possibilities that can exist out there where a player that was on a non-winning team before can come back to the same team and that team win. The suggestion that it’s impossible assigns way too much value to one individual player and not all the pieces around him

again, i dont think ted lilly is a sound acquisition given where we are, but I’m not making that assessment based on principle.

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 17, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Sure.

But any front office who would automatically disqualify anyone from playing for the Cubs just because they once did in the past, is possibly cutting themselves off from a source of good talent.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I love Ted and all.

But he’s clearly in decline.

by Dcr18 on Nov 16, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I'd take him as a #5

The thought of Rodrigo Lopez pitching in the 1st inning at Wrigley does not make me feel good at all.

It's a simple question, Doctor: would you eat the moon if it were made of ribs??

by Invalid User on Nov 16, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

Unless we see a transformation of epic proportions out of him…

"Chicago, My Kind Of Town"
UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Terry's down, oh my! Van Persie all by himself now, around Cech, and that'll do it!"

by bmasson11 on Nov 16, 2011 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

We won't.

No. More. Rodrigo.

Please.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Clearly in decline?

Other than the losing record, his numbers are remarkably similar to when he was here.

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

He did pitch in a cavernous ballpark.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:36 PM CST up reply actions  

True.

And actually had a lower ERA and fewer HR allowed on the road.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Didn't know that.

Interesting.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

It's fine to go "all in" so long as you have some foresight.

And don’t let your deals lead to back to back fifth place finishes.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

No thanks, not spending that type of money on a 33 year old

that doesn’t fit with Theo’s philosophy of spending that much on guys who moving away from their prime. Plus, I’m sure Theo knows this roster is not contending next year and likely not in 2013 when Buehrle will be 35……..just hang on to the money and rebuild it.

by MikeJW on Nov 16, 2011 10:34 AM CST reply actions  

Always contend...

Always, always, always contend. There is no rebuilding with this team anymore… No more “waiting.” Let’s just WIN.

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.

by IowaCubs- on Nov 16, 2011 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Though Theo & Jed have said it will take time to build up the system

… they have also said they wouldn’t just give up on any season. I expect them to go into 2012 with the idea of contending.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

There are ways of contending without spending oodles of money

I think Grady Sizemore would be an excellent addition to the OF

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Problem is, everyone thinks that.

for Sizemore, you’re likely bidding against the Yankees and about 6 other teams.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Nov 16, 2011 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Sizemore

The Rockies are working him out here in the next day or two down in Arizona it was reported.

"Haters are on notice- you’re worst nightmare is about to come true- a Cubs team that has the resources, manpower and common sense necessary to succeed. You probably ought to get on the bandwagon now."- Theo Epstein

by By Santo's Grace on Nov 16, 2011 6:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Jerry Crasnick says the Yanks are interested.

And the Giants, Rockies, Rangers, Phillies, and the Red Sox. And the Cubs.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Nov 17, 2011 3:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

I can’t stand this school of thought where we throw away a season or two, in hopes of having this amazing fantasy baseball roster of guys with the very best metrics in 2014.

What’s the point of playing, if you don’t play to win?

by Tat14 on Nov 16, 2011 11:47 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed as well

I think there will and SHOULD be an effort to contend NOW. Happens all the time in baseball……………almost every year there is a team or 2 in the playoffs that wasn’t expected to contend. Why not us? I think you can build for the future and contend at the same time

by plenz on Nov 16, 2011 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

there will be an effort...

but you’re confusing realism with effort…

is there going to be an effort to contend, yep.

is there a realistic chance we will contend. doubtful.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Nov 16, 2011 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

No offense but (lol)

I think you confuse pessimism with wisdom.

by Tat14 on Nov 16, 2011 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

There’s no guarantee you’re going to win in 2013 or 2014, either.

If you try to win EVERY single year, your odds of actually doing so improve dramatically.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Nov 16, 2011 9:26 PM CST up reply actions  

not if you do it like the Cubs had been in the past....

if you “try to win” by improving a 70 win team to an 80 win team but by doing so lock-up many long-term contracts to aging players, you’re not improving your changes to win every year.

You’re making big improvements on the first year’s probabilities that have declining effects after year 1.

The Cubs can keep trying to win every year, but they need to do it without significantly impacting their probabilities in future years.

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 17, 2011 12:18 PM CST up reply actions  

tutor

He would be a 2nd pitching coach as well, since he is the epitome of how to actually pitch, ala Maddux. Unless he gets insane offers, I say it’s worth a shot. Particularly if we DO build a team around defense next year.

"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields

by KedzieKid on Nov 16, 2011 10:41 AM CST reply actions  

Of course not.

Jim Hendry isn’t here any more.

The “willing to listen on everyone” is simply, I think, a matter of Theo & Jed letting everyone know that things are changing. That’s fine, but I would not want Starlin Castro dealt just for change’s sake.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

I expect Marmol to be gone though

if they can get the right deal, I think they have to keep Garza though as they would be looking at an Astros type record if they completely blow this thing up.

by MikeJW on Nov 16, 2011 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Saying you're willing to listen

also doesn’t mean “we’re having a fire sale and everyone must go.” It just means that if the Cubs were offered a great deal for Starlin, they wouldn’t hang up the phone.

God, it feels so good to have a comptetent GM. From Jim “Bobby Hill is untouchable” Hendry to Theo, it truly is night and day.

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 8:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Bobby Hill wasn't untouchable.

He was traded for Aramis Ramirez.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 17, 2011 8:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Marshall.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 12:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd throw Geo's name in there, too.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 17, 2011 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

I like Buehrle for the right price

How about Bruce Chen though? Solid starter with less mileage. Would be a solid 2/3 for us

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

Ugh.

Chen is older than Buehrle. Has had TWO good seasons in his career. No thanks.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Had a pretty good year last year

12-8, 3.77 era, 108 era+

Less than 1200 IP. Just saying, for those worried about Buehrle’s age and arm, here’s a guy who would probably be cheaper and less likely to get injured. Maybe not a 2 for us, but certainly a 3/4. Better than Randy Wells

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Chen made only 25 starts last year.

He had a couple of minor league outings which appear to be rehab assignments.

Much riskier.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 11:17 AM CST up reply actions  

25 starts and 4.68 xFIP says hello

by kingofnumber2 on Nov 16, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Not familiar with xFIP

good or bad?

"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck

Follow me on the twitter: @DJFreddie10 . I like to talk sports

by Musicdude10 on Nov 16, 2011 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Bad...

xFIP is basically what their ERA would be adjusted assuming normalized park, defense, etc.

It’s a sample of what their ERA “should” have been if all things were equal.

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

xFIP = Expected Fielding Independent Pitching

Here’s more about it, from FanGraphs. As they say, “xFIP has the highest correlation with future ERA of all the pitching metrics.”

Basically, it’s a way to look at what a pitcher’s ERA should have been, given the things he can control (strikeouts, walks, HRs) and normalized for park effects. So if a pitcher had a 3.77 ERA but a 4.68 xFIP, that means he was lucky, since his ERA should have been a run higher than it actually was. It also means that it’s unlikely that he can repeat that same performance level the next year.

by Jody Jody Davis on Nov 16, 2011 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Oops - hit enter too soon.

Meaning it’s unlikely that he would have a 3.77 ERA next year; his ERA should regress back towards the xFIP number.

by Jody Jody Davis on Nov 16, 2011 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

It is worth noting that since xFIP and FIP are so dependent on K/9

Certain players like Jurrjens consistently remain lower than their FIP and xFIP numbers.

It’s a lot like BABIP, you can say certain players are consistently lucky, or you can say that they’re simply great hitters.

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Right - and Buehrle also fits that profile.

In each of the last five years, his ERA has been lower than his xFIP.

by Jody Jody Davis on Nov 16, 2011 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

He makes Ozzie really mad, though.

Might be fun for when we play the Marlins.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 1:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Speaking of Royals and lefties....

How about Jeff Francis? The kid had some pretty decent years here in Denver. Might be worth a look.

"Haters are on notice- you’re worst nightmare is about to come true- a Cubs team that has the resources, manpower and common sense necessary to succeed. You probably ought to get on the bandwagon now."- Theo Epstein

by By Santo's Grace on Nov 16, 2011 6:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle

In order to be the most successful, Buehrle needs a solid defense behind him, especially the infield. Outside of Barney we don’t have that. I love Castro but his defense worries me, a lot. Find a way to “creatively” acquire David Wright, resign Pena, and switch positions for Barney and Castro? Sign Grady Sizemore! I have a really good feeling about him.

by FloridaCubsFan on Nov 16, 2011 11:29 AM CST reply actions  

warning fro stating the truth

been nice wont post anymore dont fit in to a group of critics

by notcubbiewubbie on Nov 16, 2011 12:09 PM CST reply actions   2 recs

Aw, c'mon...don't give up so easily.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 1:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I happen to speak NotCubbieWubbie, although I'm not familiar with this particular dialect. Let me give this a try.

“I received a warning for stating the truth. It has been a pleasure chatting with you wonderful ladies and gentlemen, however I will not be posting on this board any longer. It would appear as if I do not fit into the cliques here that tend to be more critical of this Cubs team. Good day.”

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

So then...he is a cubbiewubbie?

Has this all just been a front?

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that one of the nouns should be in the first declension -

i.e., “I do not fit in with the posters on this board, who often critique my manner of posting.”

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Nov 16, 2011 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

no way

somebody will over pay and i hope it’s not the cubs. the peripherals don’t support his ERA over the years and he’s getting up there in age. no way i’d come close to giving what i’m confident he’ll end up getting. no way theo will either.

by John T. Unger on Nov 16, 2011 12:32 PM CST reply actions  

I reserve the right

To change my mind when the facts change.

As such …. I don’t normally care for Phil Rogers, but this AM on Mully and Hanley, he mentioned that it seems that Buehrle’s priorities may have changed. Instead of openly pondering retirement, he now seems to really care about his baseball legacy. If this is indeed true, I may be able to stomach Buehrle with the Cubs.

Of course, this is as long as he can shut his stupid pie hole on how he’d like to pitch for the Cardinals, even 1 game to retire as one. If Buehrle can be professional about it, so can I. Perhaps he has matured. There are lots of other things to be concerned with, such as being afraid when going to New York, but perhaps he’s grown up there too.

I still find it very, very unlikely he signs with the Cubs because it would tarnish his White Sox legacy, but if he can show signs of not being the person he was before, I might be OK wirh it.

by jerry morales rules on Nov 16, 2011 12:34 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

The reason you don't sign Buehrle now

is the same reason you listen to offers on players like Garza and Marshall right now. Because realistically you aren’t going to contend next year, and it’s unlikely you are going to contend the year after that. Signing a free agent like Buerhle now just because he’s a good pitcher (and will make the team better but not a contender next year) can come back to hurt you down the road when you have a team that actually has a chance of competing and those dollars that could be used to sign a free agent in their prime are being taken up by a player who is no longer in their prime (a 37 year old pitcher). I know it’s no fun to “give up on a year” but the other option isn’t winning the World Series next year. The other option is constantly chasing your tail and signing an expensive free agent every year to a contract that is going to eventually become an albatross and never having the talent on your team align to the point where you become a contender. That has been the story of the Mets and that has been the story of the Cubs for the past several years, two big market teams with bloated payrolls who want nothing to do with delayed gratification and as a result end up being perpetually mediocre. Sometimes the moves that make you a better team in the short run and the moves that turn you into a contender are very different, and sometimes you actually have to choose one path over the other.

by kipwells2000 on Nov 16, 2011 12:55 PM CST reply actions  

The thing is, we may not compete in 2012...

But we also likely wont compete in 2013 if we completely ignore all FA this year and just go young/save money. If we try and construct our entire roster based off of our current roster, our farm players and only the 2012 FA class to go into 2013 and compete, we’ll fail then as well.

This is why it is so important to have a GM that prioritizes not only the short term, but has a vision for the long term. It is entirely possible to sign players this offseason that will help improve the team not only in 2012, but also in 2013 and beyond.

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I did make the Moyer comp

which breaks the rule that you should never, ever compare anyone to Jamie Moyer. (See also: Bo Jackson) But that mostly refers to prospects, not current major leaguers. But my point is that I believe that Buehrle is the type of guy who is going to age well.

Twenty-seven years ago, Bill James came up with the “Tommy John Family” of pitchers, defined as:

1. Left-Handed
2. Good Control.
3. Outstanding Moves to first
4. Ground-Ball pitcher
5. Relatively few strikeouts

This describes Buehrle to a T.

Generally, these guys age pretty well. Now the one problem is that these pitchers do tend to be more team-dependent and that they have trouble winning with a poor defense behind them. But we have to assume that the Jed is going to work on improving the Cubs defense and that we have to hope that the Cubs aren’t going to be a bad team beyond 2012.

I’m all in favor of signing Buehrle for the right price. The idea of not leaving Chicago might appeal to him.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:10 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I like it...
the Jed

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Nov 16, 2011 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

well put

I worry about their ability to put a good defense behind him, but if they can I think he will succeed.

I also think that shifting from the AL to the NL will help him out a bit.

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Nov 16, 2011 1:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm definitely game for Buehrle

I understand that Theo isn’t necessarily looking for “past performance”, but at some point, you need some veteran experience in the pitching staff, especially when you call up some kid who’s never pitched in the majors before. Being an Arsenal fan (and if your an Arsenal fan, you’ll know where I’m going with this), the average age of that team is like 20 years old, and it kills us in big time situations occasionally. Veterans help ease the transition over, give good advice that they’ve garnered over the years, and Buehrle is one of the best veteran pitchers out there currently. Do we overpay for him to come to Wrigley? I’m not sure, it all depends on what other teams bids and figures are, but for the most part, I feel like Buehrle would be an awesome fit for us.

"Chicago, My Kind Of Town"
UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Terry's down, oh my! Van Persie all by himself now, around Cech, and that'll do it!"

by bmasson11 on Nov 16, 2011 1:43 PM CST reply actions  

At the risk of looking foolish (and hoping I do),

Mark Buehrle will never pitch for the Cubs. He is beloved by Sox fans. He has been part of that Cubs/Sox rivalry since he came up. He would never come to the team that his fans hate more than any other.

IMO he and his agent are doing what they are supposed to do. He is negotiating with as many teams as he can to the drive his price up. So forget about getting a deal. If he was willing to take 3/30, the Sox would resign him.

by Rick B on Nov 16, 2011 1:45 PM CST reply actions  

It's possible you're right

But personally, I don’t think players look at this like fans do. For them, the team is an employer. If an executive at Pepsi got offered a job at Coca-Cola, I don’t think many of them would say no because they’d be going to their rival.

I think if Buehrle wants to stay in Chicago and the Cubs offer is better than the White Sox offer, he’d take it. He has to worry about his personal needs more than he has to worry about White Sox fans.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Kerry Wood would appear to be the exception that proves the rule.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Not really

Kerry Wood decided that the most important thing to him was being in Chicago. His wife was from here and he had a daughter he wanted to be with and needed medical attention that he wanted done in Chicago. He was comfortable with the Cubs. He decided that his desire to stay in Chicago was worth more money than what he’d get from another team.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

But he was being courted by the White Sox.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

What were the Sox offering?

We can’t judge his motives until we know what the Sox were offering.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought it had been reported that they offered two years.

I can’t find a link, though.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Two years

doesn’t really tell us much. If it was 2 years, $4 million, then that’s only half a million more than he made with the Cubs. Sure, there’s the extra year, but a guy like Wood could be confident enough to think that he’s not going to fall off the map enough to not earn a second one-year deal with the Cubs, which is what happened.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I remember a 2-year, $13 million offer being out there.

Or being speculated. The Red Sox were in the mix on Kerry, too, so it’s possible that if an offer like that existed, it wasn’t coming from the South Side.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I have trouble believing that

Since that’s closer money and he was finished as a closer. But if it’s true, then he either really placed a high value on returning to Chicago or he really did want to pitch for the Cubs and didn’t care about anything else.

One example of a guy who really did only want to play for the Cubs was Ron Santo. The guy retired a year after they traded him to the White Sox. But that was before free agency and it was 40 years ago.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

There were reports that Wood wanted $13 million over 2 years.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I've also heard that

Ron gave his salary back to the White Sox.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Nov 16, 2011 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

and even then if both the cubs and the Sox were offering...

it still goes back to comfort zone.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Nov 16, 2011 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Wood left after 2008.

When he returned in 2011, there was a new manager and a vastly different roster (and, notably, a different pitching coach). I suppose the facilities were similar and some players and management types were still around.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 2:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Like I said, I hope I'm wrong. I agree with you on most players.

Mark B is not most players. This is not Pepsi/ Coke. This is Cubs/Sox. By the way. I enjoy your contributions to this site.

by Rick B on Nov 16, 2011 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Well Thank You

I want to write up a story on changes to the farm system under Theo, but I’m waiting until we find out more about the new CBA.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, you may want to wait a few more weeks, as it appears they are still making changes/new hires.

I’d hate for you to go to all the effort (see: MSP Annual Player Articles) and not have it accurate.

There is going to be a lot of dust from this offseason, who knows when it will finally settle.

by bdlugz on Nov 16, 2011 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

The MSP thing

was a problem because we were trying to get people to buy that in April. If I write an article here in November and it’s out of date by December, well, that’s not really a big deal. I can always write another article.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I think we should stick a fork in Buehrle hopes.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/11/eleven-teams-in-on-mark-buehrle.html

Thirteen teams are apparently pursuing him. It will take a lot to sign the guy.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 1:53 PM CST reply actions  

Again, I don't know

It’s possible that he places a lot of value in staying in Chicago.

by Josh Timmers on Nov 16, 2011 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

With that much demand, he might pass up a LOT of money.

But I suppose you could be right.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

His wife was on CTL about 6 weeks ago and said...

…one of the main things they’ll be looking for in a new city is that they’ll be allowed to keep their dogs…whatever that means. They’re pretty hard into that animal right stuff, I guess

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Um.

What? Is there a city that outlawed dogs?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

That's what I was wondering...

is there pitbull laws in different cities?

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Or a law on how many?

By listening to her it sounds like they have a lot of them.

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Nov 16, 2011 2:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Dang right there is.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow.

Sometimes, the Internet still amazes me.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess that

rules out the Phillies. Too close to Michael Vick. Any city that still has a greyhound race track? I’ve heard the sport’s almost extinct and the last stronghold of it is in Florida.

I think it’s only a potential issue if they don’t live in suburbs. If they have many dogs, then that would run into issues in cities potentially.

by ddoubleheader on Nov 16, 2011 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle owns a home in Orland Park

… and is raising his family in the Chicago area. Seems as if he likes it here.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Nov 16, 2011 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

It appears the dogs could be a gamechanger.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah they're like the crazy cat lady

Only with dogs.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

This whole Buehrle signing ...

is going to the dogs.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe we should go after Randy Woof instead...

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Nov 16, 2011 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I, too, have gone on record as saying Buehrle would never play for the Cubs.

And though I’ll admit there seems to be a stronger possibility now that he might, I think it would take Theo & Jed making the absolute best offer on the market — which more than likely would mean overpaying. I don’t fault them for having discussions with Buehrle, though, as he certainly could be a stabilizing force in any rotation.

And, just out of curiousity, I wandered over to SSS to see what they’re saying. You can peruse that thread here. You might also check out the 2009 Trib article posted there, which provides one example of the kind of pointed remarks Buehrle has made about the Cubs and Wrigley Field in the past.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 1:55 PM CST reply actions  

I'm not seeing...

… any hate or ill directed towards the Cubs & nor directly against Cubs fans in the article linked above.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 4:38 PM CST up reply actions  

...
I don’t know if I could even sign with the (St. Louis) Cardinals, as much as everybody knows one day I want to play for the Cardinals. I don’t know if I could because that means I’d have to go to Wrigley three times, and that’s how much I hate going over there.

So if he wasn’t referring to the Cubs or their fans, what was he referring to? The condition of the field?

(By the way, what the hell was Buehrle talking about? If he signed with the Cardinals, he’d have to go to Wrigley Field a lot more than three times. He only had to go there three times with the White Sox.)

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, right.

The rats and all that.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Clearly...

MB does not seem to like going to Wrigley. Who knows he might not like many things about Wrigley – the hassle to get there, conditions of the clubhouse – and not liking Wrigley Field is apparently an unforgivable sin to many Cubs fans. Mark pitched for 11 years with the Sox. In that time I don’t imagine his memories of WF are of it being “The Friendly Confines” probably quite the opposite. Bu even at that, Mark does not hate of the Cubs nor Cub fans clearly in the article you linked to.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Whoa, whoa.

Don’t start calling Buehrle “MB”. Another guy with those initials played here once. Didn’t end well.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 5:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the laugh!

I’m using an iPhone and I have not mastered the ‘keyboard’. So I use abbreviations wherever I can.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 5:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Way to underplay the remarks.

What daver quoted sure doesn’t seem like a guy who simply doesn’t seem to like going to Wrigley. His vitriol is unnecessary.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Vitriol?

Isn’t that overplaying it?

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 5:32 PM CST up reply actions  

When you say you wouldn't play for your favorite team growing up

Because you hate having to possibly play at another team’s stadium, that’s some serious hate going on.

Of course, I believe those type of remarks are meant to appease the White Sox fanbase. It’s entirely possible I’m wrong, though.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 5:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Appeasement

I doubt Mark was trying to appease my fellow Sox fans by that comment. As much as some in the media and some Cubs fans would like everyone to believe that Mark pitching for the Cubs will anger Sox fans the facts are that that is not the case for many Sox fans.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 5:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, I completely agree on your latter statement.

And I’ll trust you on the appeasement. I just don’t see the point of going overboard on criticizing Wrigley. If he doesn’t like the joint, hey, no problem. I don’t see the purpose of trashing the place, though.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 5:43 PM CST up reply actions  

"Hate the place"

Is not the same as trashing it, IMHO. I honestly don’t think the comments that I’ve read are as bad as they are made to sound here.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 6:34 PM CST up reply actions  

"Hate and Love tatooed across the knuckles of his hands..."

If Mark were to trash the Cubs, Wrigley and Cubs fans you’d think there would be more there, examples, “I hate the Cubs because of…” but that’s not there. There is nothing in that statement to definitively say he was ripping Cubs fans.

To give an example, the owner of the place I work, has said virtually the same thing about Wrigley. He hates Wrigley, his words, and won’t go but I know he doesn’t hate the Cubs (in fact he’s ambivalent about them).

You’ve said he’s “gone overboard on criticizing Wrigley.” Why? Because he doesn’t like it?

Cubs fans are funny, why is it that you guys are so hyper sensitive to the slightest comment about Wrigley and/or all things Cubbie? It seems to me that in order to play, manage or GM the Cubs you have to profess love for Wrigley, or else. Even recently, there was Dave Kaplan writing that Theo was coming because the Cubs was “his dream job.” Give me break! Money? Power? Those things had nothing to do with it?

If Mark Buehrle, or anyone else, dislikes Wrigley, so what? If they can improve your team, who cares?

And finally, as I’ve said, there has been a lot of stretching and overacting to Mark’s comment. I honestly don’t think the comments that I’ve read are as bad as they are made to sound here. He merely said he “hated Wrigley.”

by DrCrawdad on Nov 16, 2011 8:59 PM CST up reply actions  

I do not want to get involved with this argument

but I do agree with you here

If they can improve your team, who cares?

with Jim Edmonds as an example.

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Nov 16, 2011 9:03 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

What is it that you're not getting?

You keep on saying “what’s the big deal with him not liking it?” There’s nothing wrong with that. In daver’s quote he goes out of his way to point out how much he “hates” the place. Why?

I’m not hyper sensitive about the whole thing. You just seem intent on finding ways to boil down the words so that they have zero meaning. You did the same thing with Reinsdorf comments. Words have meaning. You can’t just “merely” hate something.

But yes, if he can improve the team, I’m all for it. I just don’t understand the point of going so far out of your way to let your negative opinion of a stadium be known. It’s unnecessary.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 16, 2011 9:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I never said it was an unforgiveable sin.

It’s actually pretty understandable. That was just one example of a statement Buehrle has made publicly expressing negativity toward an organization that’s trying to sign him.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 16, 2011 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't understand the "We won't contend" logic

I see so many people say the Cubs won’t contend in 2012, so why bother signing player X, but even if they won’t contend in 2012 you HAVE to start building for the future today. So if the Cubs sign Buerhle for 3 years, they’ll have him in 2013 and 2014 when they’ll hopefully have a better team around him. If you remain stagnant and do nothing this offseason, what do you have in 2013? You’ll have a bunch of people saying the same thing, “Don’t sign player Y because the Cubs won’t contend in 2013.” So basically if those saying this want to save everything and load up for 2014 (which would be something similar to 2007).

Add a pitcher or two and a bat this offseason, add another piece or two after 2012, and the Cubs will be ready in 2013. Just don’t throw 2012 away and sign nobody because the team might not look like a contender.

by timmyfan on Nov 16, 2011 2:05 PM CST reply actions  

I think the notion is

that a player entering his mid-30’s is most likely to maintain peak performance for only another few years, hence, the phrase about overpaying for past performance. If you’re a contender — think the Phillies and Cliff Lee last season — it’s worth it for you to sign this sort of player, as you feel he can help get you over the top. Usually, those are large market teams to boot, so they can carry a bad contract for a year or two if a pitcher like this goes south fairly quickly.

It’s tough to see the Cubs having realistic championship aspirations over the next few seasons, so 10-12 million annually (yes, I think Mark will get that, at least), is probably better spent on 1) amateur draft signings of high-profile, high-ceiling pitchers who can be ready in 2-3 years, 2) complimentary talent (preferably younger), which allows you to go get a Buehrle when you’re ready for some help to get you over the top, 3) or keeping your powder dry for a potential dump; a promising pitcher (younger), who may come available due to the economics of the other club. See Matt Garza as an example.

Honestly, there really is no case for the Cubs to sign Mark, barring some significant “hometown” discount. But hey, I guess it makes for a nice conversation starter. In any case, staying out of the free agent market for an off-season really shouldn’t be taken as being stagnant.

by Damen Jackson on Nov 16, 2011 2:57 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

I see your point

And it makes sense for Buerhle, but as most are saying here it’s get him for the right price. But some people seem to think staying out of the market completely is good because the Cubs won’t win in 2012 and that thinking I do not agee with.

by timmyfan on Nov 16, 2011 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

i dont think anyone has advocated to bring back the 2011 team

I think most of us are used to the band aids that hendry slapped around every offseason. But, as well documented, This years Free agent pitching class is next to Nil, where 2013’s is pretty stacked. so what we dont want is to over pay for a 34 year old when you can have some shots at legit top of the rotation pitchers next year, when Z’s contract is gone, Dempsters is gone so thats 32 million dollars alone off the books where we can get real quality for a few years as opposed to gambling on an older arm to band aid the rotation.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Nov 16, 2011 4:35 PM CST up reply actions  

The other part is that the Cubs are already carrying some bad contracts in 2012

They are set up to pay Soriano, Zambrano and Dempster something over $50M. Unless the Stat Pack can move some money, that limits flexibility, too. Al did a post in the last couple of days that ran the estimated 2012 payroll up to about $87M with no FA signings. That might mean enough to sign Buerhle and Fielder, but they would be it. 3B would need to be an internal solution, along with one OF position and one starter.

by ClarkFan on Nov 16, 2011 5:12 PM CST up reply actions  

NO.

Buehrle just came off of a 4/56 deal, why would he take a pay cut and pitch for less than $14M?

Since the FA market this year is DEVOID of solid pitching, there will likely be market inflation.

Given FA pitching looks MUCH better next year, and we’ll have more contracts on the books, save the money and make a better potential choice/investment.

We should use this year, in my opinion, to make wise investments and perhaps see what we have locally, i.e. Jackson, LaHair, perhaps others at 3B, etc. I know I’ll get alot of negative response for this-but one year isn’t going to kill us, especially if we’re wise about saving money and investing it in smarter opportunities for 2013 and beyond.

by jballgame on Nov 16, 2011 5:23 PM CST reply actions  

You can be against Buehrle signing at $56 million ...

and still realize that “one year isn’t going to kill us” is the type of thinking that could really alienate the fanbase.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 5:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh please...........

Like one more year of not being competitive is really going to alienate our fanbase. If Theo et al explain WHY they’re not doing things such as signing Buehrle and WHAT their longer term plan is, I’d be willing to bet the fanbase will get behind it. Let’s not pretend as though we’ll be competitive, even if we sign guys like Buehrle, Sizemore, etc.

by jballgame on Nov 16, 2011 6:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Have you been asleep since 2003?

What a great slogan that would be for 2012: “Cubs 2012: One more year of not being competitive isn’t going to kill us.”

by Not Bruce Froemming on Nov 16, 2011 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Not Bruce...........

is Not Getting my point. Spending on Buehrle to be more competitive next year, especially at the cost he’s going to require over 3-4 years, makes it MORE difficult to be competitive after next year because of the commitment. I’d much rather commit resources, i.e. dollars, in 2013 to a much better FA pitching class than commit dollars to Buehrle this year because he’s the tallest of the midgets in a weak FA starting pitching year.

by jballgame on Nov 17, 2011 5:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind seeing Buerhle on the North Side

He’s been a model of consistency. He’s a high character class act whose defense could rub off on young pitchers and players. But if the Cubs sign him, they sure better sign a glove for third base and should do the same at first (whether by re-signing Pena or landing someone else). Was it Al who proposed the idea of signing Rollins to play third? I’d take that, and let him tutor Castro. Or maybe Omar Vizquel, who will get into the Hall for defense (and longevity) and come at a cheaper price.

Signing Buehrle would help make the flamethrowers in the rotation and the bullpen more effective because then there’s a greater difference in velocity. It was hard to get excited over Joe Borowski as closer when there was a litany of arms leading up to him that made him look like a BP guy. With the heat we have in the bullpen, a low-velocity guy like Buehrle could set the pace for mixing up hitters’ timing. You think the Madduxes wouldn’t love to work with him?

by brywilson102 on Nov 16, 2011 5:33 PM CST reply actions  

You want Vizquel to be the everyday third baseman?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Nov 16, 2011 5:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Isn't Viz like approaching AARP age?

UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Terry's down, oh my! Van Persie all by himself now, around Cech, and that'll do it!"

by bmasson11 on Nov 16, 2011 8:32 PM CST up reply actions  

This isn't a comment for or against trying to sign Buerhle

I am in favor of any pitcher that is more of a control/soft tosser to break up the parade of fireballers the Cubs trot out every series, I think having a totally different hurler to deal with in a series helps keep the opposition off balance. It always worked that way against the Cubs lol

"IN THEO WE TRUST"

by BigJohnAZ on Nov 16, 2011 6:20 PM CST reply actions  

I am ok with the signing of MB

But I am going to ask something random. Its been a couple years since I was a regular on this site so I am sorry if I didnt take the time to search….

What is this I hear about the possibility of trading for David Wright. I have moved to Tampa, FL, so my local Cubs news has been slacking a little bit… time to get back on track before spring training.

GO BULLS AND BLACKHAWKS!

by SouthsideCUBSfan on Nov 16, 2011 6:28 PM CST reply actions  

I agree with elgato.

We really shouldn’t refer to Buehrle as “MB.”

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 17, 2011 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

My grandpa watched DJ LeMahieu today in the AFL

Here is what he had to say. This coming from a guy who had never heard of him

Anyway, the point is that the Mesa team is made up of minor leaguers from the Cubs, Orioles,Pirates, Twins and White Sox and playing in the game was a Cubs minor leaguer named D.J.LeMahieu. He’s a 23 year old from Visalia,Ca., 6’4" 205 lb. 1st baseman playing with the Iowa AAA club.
He was 2 for 3 with a walk, stole 2nd once, made a great playing catching a guy in a rundown, and generally looked good. Watch for him.

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Nov 16, 2011 6:31 PM CST reply actions  

That's a verbatim quote from your grandfather?

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 17, 2011 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah copied and pasted from his email to me

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Nov 17, 2011 5:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Ohhh, I thought he said it out loud, which seemed strange.

Makes sense via email.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 18, 2011 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Sign him yesterday if you can.

Front load the contract for once if you have to.

All the guy does is pitch well and eat innings without being injured. The only way you ‘overpay’ for a pitcher like that is if you go $20m/year for them. If Ryan Dempster is worth $14m, then Buehrle is easily worth $16m/year.

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Nov 16, 2011 6:33 PM CST reply actions  

There's a pretty decent chance that Dempster performs well enough next year to be worth $14 million

And besides, if you believe in fangraphs’ player valuation methods (I personally think they’re at least a good ballpark), Dempster’s already outperformed his contract by about $4 million, so he’s only going to have to be about a 2.2 WAR player (very doable for him) to be worth the 4-year $52 million contract the Cubs originally gave him.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Nov 16, 2011 10:41 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Things that he had control of like strikeouts and walks were about the same as 2010

2010 8.50 k/9 3.59 bb/9

2011 8.20 k/9 3.55 bb/9

XFIP was 3.70

Even with the bad defense i expect his ERA to drop a lot especially when he isn’t being left in games too long by Quade

Bill James projects him for a 3.95 era in 2012.

by Mitchener on Nov 18, 2011 4:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Totally agree.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Nov 17, 2011 10:02 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd rather get Edwin Jackson

A) He’s 4.5 years younger than Buehrle.

B) Recently, he’s been better. Jackson has 11.2 WAR over the past three years versus 10.5 WAR for Buehrle (from Fangraphs).

C) I think he’ll cost less, because Buehrle has a stronger reputation around the league.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Nov 16, 2011 7:11 PM CST reply actions  

Jackson would be decent

But I doubt he’d be any less expensive than Buehrle, both are easily worth their pricetags, no more or less

UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Terry's down, oh my! Van Persie all by himself now, around Cech, and that'll do it!"

by bmasson11 on Nov 16, 2011 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know

I’m hearing Buehrle’s name pop up in rumors a lot more than Jackson’s, and that tells me the demand for Buehrle is probably higher.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Nov 16, 2011 10:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I also like Jackson's upside

He reminds me of Garza. He’s got a really good fastball. He is inconsistent like garza before he was a Cub.

I saw this interesting article on comparing Jackson to Danks.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/john-danks-the-left-handed-edwin-jackson/

by Mitchener on Nov 18, 2011 4:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Buehrle as a Cub?

I’m not sure if I remember this correctly, but I thought Buehrle once said that he’d never pitch for the Cubs. From what I remember, he was quite adamant about that. I think it was the last time he was up for a new contract. It doesn’t make sense, unless he was just saying that in a “WWE” style of speech to excite Sox fans & piss off Cub fans.

Proud member of the Lee Elia 15% club!

by dansram on Nov 16, 2011 7:55 PM CST reply actions  

What? Mike Morgan is not available?

Been there, done that. Quit paying for over the hill pitchers like Buerhle. The Cubs have money, spend it on getting some quality players for once, instead of settling for has-beens and never-will-bes.

by PokyCubs on Nov 16, 2011 8:15 PM CST reply actions  

Have you looked at the free agent market for pitchers this year?

There simply aren’t any that demand a great deal of money that are light years better than Buehrle

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Then maybe the right answer is "don't sign FA pitchers"

If you were shopping for produce and all the fruit was overripe or overpriced, would you buy some anyway?

by ClarkFan on Nov 16, 2011 9:07 PM CST up reply actions  

And I don't neccesarily disagree with that

But Poky’s comment was we should spend a bundle of money on some other pitchers. There aren’t any worth a bundle this year

by Nunyabidness on Nov 16, 2011 9:47 PM CST up reply actions  

When was the last time Cubs overpaid for a pitcher like Buehrle?

The only starting pitcher that the Cubs have overpaid in recent memory is Carlos Zambrano, and he’s not remotely similar to Buehrle.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Nov 16, 2011 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope

Jason Marquis actually outperformed his contract by a huge margin (mostly thanks to his very solid 2009 year with the Rockies, but still). I will grant you that the Cubs probably just got lucky because he was coming off an absolutely miserable 2006 season.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Nov 17, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

If I really wanted the fruits of said purchase I guess I would overpay.

Or make banana bread. Moyer anyone?

Sometimes you have to pay the piper. Considering the Ortiz-Lopez-Davis-Russell fiasco of last year, this definitely seems like one of those times.

"I'd rather hit home runs you don't have to run as hard." -- Dave Kingman

by BucknerKongCardenal on Nov 16, 2011 9:36 PM CST reply actions  

Tough one for me

I know Mark a little through charity things I’ve been involved with. I adore him. He has teased me that he and Konerko will turn me yet :). I have never made secret my love of Konerko and Buerhle on these boards.

On a side note he and Kerry Wood are close friends as their wives are too. They are both heavily involved in a couple of the same charities.

But I think he’s too expensive for the Cubs needs right now. I think the money is better spent elsewhere.

If he does sign with the Cubs would that be the biggest name ever to switch sides while still having some good years left or into their career?

Obviously Sosa and Santo were different stories. While they were huge names Sammy was just starting when he became a Cub and Santo was at the end when he became a Sox.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 17, 2011 5:39 AM CST reply actions  

When I say big name I also mean someone so identified with the other team as well.

This would almost be like if Kerry had signed with the Sox last year or Konerko had come to the Cubs.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 17, 2011 5:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Every piece of fruit

in the free agent market is overpriced and you are competing with many others who want to overpay for it. So even a large market team has to be smart about the timing of when you bite the bullet and make a move that is going to put you over the edge. Otherwise you are just perpetually making yourself a better non-contender and limiting the money you have available when you actually have a contending team that you would like to add an impact player to.
It’s a lot like that experiment they did a few years ago when they put a cookie in front of kids and told them they could have the single cookie now or have 5 cookies in an hour (the ones that were willing to wait for 5 cookies generally had more success in life). Delayed gratification!

by kipwells2000 on Nov 17, 2011 7:53 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

If Al's assumption that Buehrle could be signed for less than he's making now is correct,

I’m all for signing him. I strongly doubt that this will happen given the strong interest he seems to have created so far, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

However I can’t stand to hear this nonsense about rebuilding anymore. “Rebuilding” has nothing to do with who to sign or for what kinda money.
Either the price for Buherle (or any other player for that matter) is right, or it’s not. There’s no two ways about it.
If we write off 2012 before it even started, this neither helps the team getting better nor will it save the Cubs a single buck.
If they end up overpaying for someone in a desperate attempt to “compete” , it’s simply a bad deal.

by DamageControlFreak on Nov 17, 2011 8:25 AM CST reply actions  

I would enjoy this signing....

…just to watch the heads of fans of the other Chicago team explode.

It's 106 miles to Chicago...

by BDR529 on Nov 17, 2011 4:32 PM CST reply actions  

Keep Waiting, Keep Searching

First of all this whole, ‘Buehrle To The Cubs’ is most likely just the Mark’s agent fluffing the market. Second there is the question of whether or not Buehrle fits into the Cubs plans – financially and plans for the future. And finally…

Apparently you haven’t checked out what Sox fans are saying about IF Buehrle signed with the Cubs.

At least as far as this Sox fan is concerned, if Buehrle signs with the Cubs, fine. No problem. I’d pull for Buehrle to win every start, except of course any games against the Sox. And IF Buehrle signed with the Cubs and I were in attendance at The Cell when Mark walked out to the mound the first time in Cubs uniform, I’d give him a standing ovation. And thereafter, I would not boo the man. Why?

Mark Buehrle played a key role in the Sox 2005 World Championship with a win and a save, in addition to being a pleasure to watch in his 11 year career with the Sox.

“Watch the heads of fans of the other Chicago team explode?” That happened in 2005 when the Sox won the World Series. Cubs fans have been on edge ever since too.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 19, 2011 8:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Dr Crawdad

Who would you compare this switch to if this were to happen?

A friend said it would be like Kerry changing teams. No in my opinion Konerkno would be like Wood. Buerhle would be more like Dempster becoming a Sox.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 19, 2011 3:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Compted

It’s interesting, as much as the poster I replied to and others here wish that Buehrle signing with the Cubs would cause “angst” & “heads to explode” amongst Sox fans, I’m not seeing it at SouthSideSox and WhiteSoxInteractive nor do I feel that personally. On the other hand, IIRC Cubs fans did have loads of angst with the possibility of the Sox signing Wood. And I seem to recall anxiexty about the possibility of Ryne joining the Whites Sox staff.

The funny thing about the Wood case was that he had left the Cubs and then played for the Indians & Yankees. And in spite of that separation there was still such “visceral reaction” to Wood playing for the Sox.

So considering the lack so far of a comparable reaction to Buehrle leaving I don’t have an answer.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 19, 2011 7:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Honestly

I know some of the people at southsidesox and whitesoxinteractive. I’ve even gone to Sox games with them.

I’m not tlaking about you and the men and women there I’m talking about the meatball fan.

Just as I expect Buerhle would get a nice ovation at the Cell even as a Cub, the Cub fans would give a nice ovation to Wood or Dempster if they became Sox.

Most fans I know didn’t have a problem with Wood becoming a Sox. And I may be Kerry’s biggest fan. And this is sacriledge but I felt the Sox would be competitive in 2011 so if he didn’t come back to the Cubs I would be glad to see him sign with a team I felt had a chance to win. (Honestly I was shocked at the Sox being so bad at the beginning and end last year).

I only root for the Sox to lose when we play them. 156 games a year they are just another team. I was genuinely happy for my fiends who are Sox fans when they won in 2005. I was a regular on a Sox board back then where there were several Cub fans and also a lot of Sox fans crossed over to the CUbs board in the same group of sites. I beat the other Cub fans to posting that night.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 19, 2011 8:33 PM CST up reply actions  

What's your ...

… user name at White Sox Interactive?

by DrCrawdad on Nov 21, 2011 11:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Not talking about reaction as much as we’ve never seen a player of this magnitude change teams at this stage in their career.

Sosa and Santo are obviously the biggest names to ever play for both teams. But Sammy was just starting and Santo was at the end.

Mark has some good years left.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 19, 2011 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Hum, not sure...what about...

Kidding but there is somewhat of a comparison I suppose. However, Buehrle has only pitched for the Sox. That’s why the Wood comparison don’t compare, because if it were comparable Wood would have split with the Cubs and gone straight to the Sox.

In the end though I don’t expect Buehrle to land with the Cubs in 2012. If he does, best wishes to him.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 21, 2011 11:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd like to see him sign with the Cubs because I think he's got something in the tank yet

That’s all I really care about.

And I believe you that you wouldn’t boo him. I wouldn’t boo, say, Derrek Lee if he played for the White Sox. (I realize that’s not going to happen, just an example.)

Step Two: Develop an organizational plan

by Shanghai Badger on Nov 21, 2011 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

MB...

… does have something left in the tank. If it were my money though I easily agree to a 2 year deal, 3 years? Not really thrilled with that. 4 years? Yes, so long it’s a team option.

by DrCrawdad on Nov 21, 2011 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Broad brush, Dr. C

Cubs fans and White Sox fans aren’t as enamored with the crosstown team as you are.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Nov 23, 2011 4:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Not quite as good

Not quite as good but he’s very similar to Maddux in many ways. Off the field as well. Great guy. Very smart in the game.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Nov 19, 2011 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Small
Top 10 things I liked about watching the Cubs lose at PNC Park
Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

A Day In The Life Of An A-Ball Minor Leaguer
Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  1005 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima