Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

... the Cleveland Indians. (Minor league deal, spring training invite.)

6 months ago Alyellontoppscard_tiny Al Yellon 59 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Anybody else wondering

if the Cubs will bid on Norichika Aoki? Highest OBP in the Japan league, not tremendous speed, but a solid outfielder with a poor arm. I haven’t seen estimates of how much he might cost. It would be difficult to find a player more similar to Fukudome, but Kosuke had more power and less AVG and OBP in Japan than Aoki.

...formerly known as zambranofan

by cubzfan on Dec 12, 2011 8:51 AM CST reply actions  

Is he posted?

Or is he a free agent?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 12, 2011 8:57 AM CST up reply actions  

i think i read hes about to be posted.

but my question is why and where? why sign him if he’s a lot like DeJesus, and where is he going to play? i’d rather see Jackson and a run at Cespedes

by MDavis on Dec 12, 2011 9:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Ummm, what in there would make you not want him?

The poor arm (that I mentioned above)? He’s a career .400 OBA player in Japan. It’s just sort of ironic that as Theo and Jed take over, with possible outfield slots open, there is a player available, maybe at a very low price, who could be a positive outlier at getting on base; but, he’s very similar to a player the Cubs just got rid of (at least on paper) and they just signed DeJesus, who is also similar.

...formerly known as zambranofan

by cubzfan on Dec 12, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Looks like a poor man's Fukudome.

Been there, done that.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 12, 2011 11:22 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

If the Nationals are that desperate for outfield help...

Do you think they would look at Marlon Byrd? He is certainly projected to be better than Aoki, is a solid defender, and is signed to a reasonable contract. Perahps we can get salary relief and a prospect in return?

What are your thoughts?

by nickler on Dec 12, 2011 4:32 PM CST up reply actions  

He sounds like

Juan Pierre without the speed.

by tomas21 on Dec 12, 2011 9:48 AM CST up reply actions  

See my comment above.

Do you think this makes the Nationals a possible trade partner for Marlon Byrd?

by nickler on Dec 12, 2011 4:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't know how desparate the Nationals would be to trade for Byrd...

he already played for them in 2005-2006 and I don’t think they were impressed. Granted, he’s improved as player since then, but they might not be in a hurry for a second go around.

"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"--The Brain

by brook on Dec 12, 2011 6:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I hadn't realized he is only 26.

Also, it’s interesting that a fringe player like Pie can be making nearly a million a year.

by Clark Addison on Dec 12, 2011 9:22 AM CST reply actions  

Wow.

What a difference 4 years make. From a untouchable in the Cubs system to a spring training invite.

by Grockcubs on Dec 12, 2011 9:46 AM CST reply actions  

Another great scouting and drafting gem from

the “former regime”.

That and many more like him, is why the Cubs system is what it is, right now.

If you think you've seen it all...just wait!

by CubFanSince1970 on Dec 12, 2011 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Pie was always high-risk / high reward

Plus he did put up some good minor league numbers.

BA had him rated highly, so it is not like Hendry & Co where the only ones expecting more from him.

I’ve always wondered if his, ahem, injury, somehow caused effected him long-term.

"We gotta circle the bandwagons." - Devin Hester

by Jose's Eyelid on Dec 12, 2011 10:21 AM CST up reply actions  

It's possible ...

that the instruction Pie received in the minors put him on the wrong path. The Cubs, under Hendry, had an unbelievably awful track record at producing patient position players. Other than Soto, the last Cubs prospect who could take a walk was probably Mark Grace.

I would love to see a good, in-depth piece about how much coaching (at various levels) impacts players’ approaches at the plate. Some say it’s too late to tinker with this kind of thing in the majors. I wonder if the same could be said about the minors?

So, are Cubs prospects impatient at the plate because the system doesn’t foster patience, or did the Cubs for years not draft/sign patient players?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it is both

We drafted “Toolsy” players for so many years (and basically none of them have panned out).

I have yet to see an example of our Minor League coaches taking “raw talent” and refining it to the point of making a better ballplayer than when they started.

There is no reason why we shouldn’t have the best minor league coaches in all of baseball. I know it would not be a gaurantee of success, but at least the odds would increase that some players would benefit from their teaching.

If you think you've seen it all...just wait!

by CubFanSince1970 on Dec 12, 2011 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I doubt it.

Pie’s swing was awful. I never liked him from the first time I saw him. He got by in the minors on great talent but major league pitchers are going to find the holes. I remember Piniella going down to work with him over the winter. I never saw any improvement and it was after that that Piniella seemed to write him off.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 12, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

at 18 in the MWL

Pie went .285/.346/.388. Very few teenagers in their second year of pro ball can do that—he was justifiably hyped, especially after following up with a couple very good years. The raw ability was evident, but I think he lacked the ability (work ethic, baseball IQ—especially as it translates to pitch recognition—etc) to build on it. I doubt it was work ethic though, Pie was one of the most enthusiastic players I’ve seen in a long time.

Right now, Cheslor Cuthbert for the Royals is getting big hype (like top 30-40 prospect) for a .267/.345/.397 line at 18 in the MWL…people still think it’s an indicator of success. For that type of prospect, if I were a GM in trade talks I’d look really hard at the scouts’ reports on their willingness to learn/work.

by PrincetonCubs on Dec 12, 2011 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Eh ...

the main problem here wasn’t that Hendry et. al botched Pie on scouting and drafting. Pie didn’t turn out to be a Harvey or a Dopirak. But Hendry overvalued Pie once the Cubs acquired him and considered him an untouchable when he could have been a valuable trade chip.

Not since the 2003-04 teams (the Lee and Ramirez trades) did Hendry sell high on a top prospect and look good for it after the fact. That’s not to say all his trades were bad or that all the guys he traded ended up being nothings. But aside from the Garza trade — for which the jury is still out on the prospects — when did Hendry sell high on a top prospect and outsmart the other team in the process? I guess the Harden trade could apply. But no one thought the A’s got anything great back — it was billed by a couple experts as a “quantity-not-quality” haul.

I really think that Hendry, at one point in time, was a pretty good GM. His work in 2003-04 was good, and the patchwork moves for 2005 were more about making chicken salad than anything else (after the 2004 collapse). But, sometime around 2006, Hendry started to get outsmarted by other GMs where he used to outsmart the likes of Dave Littlefield. This was disguised for a while by the crazy spending in 2006-08 and the good teams that followed.

Comparatively speaking, I’m not sure if Hendry got worse. It was just that everybody else — the other GMs — got better.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 10:23 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Hendry

Just took riskier and riskier bets in the hopes that he’d have something to show for all the money he spent before the house of cards came down. If he’d won a WS in the process (or hell, even just made it to the WS for the first time since WWII), we probably wouldn’t be so down on him.

by EcoGeek on Dec 12, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Elaborate.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

After 2003

And getting closer to the WS than we had been in most Cubs’ fans lifetimes, I think there was a lot of pressure to seal the deal. 2004 would have been a great year if not for all the injuries, and I think people felt the same about 2005. When a trend emerged in 2006, he knew he had to make some big moves to right the ship, which is why you saw Soriano (the off-season’s premiere free agent, if memory serves) signed for the 2007 season. With the trip to the playoffs in 2007, there was the feeling that the Cubs were only a piece or two away, so they spent big on Fukudome, a risk given the history of other Japanese players coming to the US, but likely a good candidate to get the job done. When that wasn’t enough, you saw Milton Bradley come over in 2008. Hendry had to know his window of opportunity was closing with the aging of the players who made the run in 2003 (at least those who were still left), and with the constraints of a tighter and tighter payroll caused by his spending, had to take bigger and bigger risks to fit players within the budget he was allowed.

Hendry knew that if he was the guy to bring the Cubs a WS victory, he’d be untouchable, so he wasn’t worrying about the future. He was doing everything he could to put the Cubs in the postseason each season which worked for a little while, until the weight of the bad contracts he’d signed had robbed any hope for the future.

by EcoGeek on Dec 12, 2011 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Eh ...

I think there are a lot of holes in that. Looking at each offseason, Hendry’s biggest missteps (other than maybe Bradley) weren’t big gambles gone wrong.

1) 2003-04: All about bringing in reinforcements to the 2003 team that came close — but none of the moves was particularly risky. Some of them (Hawkins, Barrett) were good players who were square pegs in round holes — not failed risks.

2) 2004-05: The team needed a root canal after the late-season collapse. Most of the moves in that offseason (and into early 2005) stemmed from the need to dump guys (Sosa, Farnsworth, Hawkins). The big signing that offseason was Burnitz to a 1-year deal. Not exactly risky.

3) 2005-06: Hendry gambled a lot (and lost) on Juan Pierre. But the other moves were idiotic extensions for Rusch and Neifi, and a somewhat reasonable deal for Jacque Jones.

4) 2006-07: Trib opens its wallet to make the team better/easier to sell. But other than Soriano’s contract, the others made sense. The bewildering thing wasn’t the individual moves (Lilly got less than Gil Meche) it was all the moves added up (with Lee’s extension in early 2006 and Zambrano’s in late 2007).

5) 2007-08: Basically, this was the offseason of Kosuke. The Cubs were one of several teams who severely misjudged him, but considering that they weren’t even the high bidder, I don’t think this was Hendry being too much of a gambler.

6) 2008-09: By far, Hendry’s worst offseason — and it was built around the risky signing of Milton Bradley. That signing is still bewildering. Even with the year Bradley had in 2008, why did he get so much more money than Adam Dunn? I just think Hendry was off his game this offseason, for whatever reason. Everything he did just turned out so badly.

7) 2009-10: Another offseason built around dumping players (Bradley and Miles). Neither move was risky, though. And the Byrd signing was the beginning of two years of patchwork.

8) 2010-11: The Garza trade WAS a big risk. But the other big move of the offseason (the return of Kerry Wood) wasn’t.

So, other than the Garza and Pierre trades — both of which required a big haul of prospects and both of which occurred before really bad years — and the Bradley signing, I don’t think Hendry’s problem was risk taking. Hendry waited too long for Wood/Prior to be 2003 good again and then was the GM when the team handed out four really bad contracts within 26 months (Bradley, Kosuke, Soriano, Zambrano).

Hendry had a lot of problems that could be considered his main failing — his inability to develop position players (particularly ones with plate discipline) would be at the top of my list. He did take some risks that fell through, but I think that was a symptom, not a root cause.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

My contention

Is that his moves got riskier as time went on. ‘03-’05 wasn’t risky at all (which we agree on). Then, chronologically, you’ve got Juan Pierre, Soriano, Fukudome, and Bradley, all of which were increasing in risk. After Bradley, I’d say that the walls indeed came down but with the sale of the team, it took a couple years for it all to catch up to Hendry.

Also, as a counterpoint to your theory, the Hendry moves that we most regret were FA signings, not trades, which somewhat removes other GMs from the equation (at least in comparison to trades).

In all honesty, the truth is probably somewhere between our points.

by EcoGeek on Dec 12, 2011 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm ecstatic Hendry is gone.

But I do miss wandering into threads and rec’ing every post where D98 straight up dumped all over Hendry, so this is getting green.

Theo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Dec 12, 2011 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

That should have been like 4 posts. I didn't realize it was so long.

I think I blacked out there for a while

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

A Will Ferrell in Old School moment?

"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."

by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST

by fsuapollo on Dec 12, 2011 8:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Im rec'ing this just because I have to scroll so much to read it all

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Dec 12, 2011 3:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm.

I’m not sure if I buy this premise. Are you saying the Cubs were doomed because they didn’t bite on Guerrero and Beltran?

I think that’s oversimplifying. It certainly hurt them in 2004-05. But they could have made better choices in the following years.

Interesting post, though.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think those failures *doomed* Hendry.

I think that, had Hendry signed either Vlad OR Beltran, he would have been unlikely to have committed his more egregious errors, especially wrt outfield procurement.

If he’d signed Beltran, it’s unlikely he would have (could have) signed Soriano. But more to the point, he also wouldnt have traded for Pierre, because CF would have been covered.

Honestly, the fallout from not signing Carlos Beltran sent the team into about 5 years worth of spiraling poor decisions. No Beltran meant getting Pierre. Pierre’s failure got us Jones. Jones’ failure got us Dome. And Dome’s failure got us Bradley. 5 years of trying to compensate for the prior year’s failed OF acquisition, and failing.

Hendry still could have recovered, even after missing on those two elite bats. It was just a tougher job. And he made poor decisions in constructing rosters from that point forward.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 7:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Pierre and Jones were acquired in the same offseason.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 12, 2011 7:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Right. Pierre's failure got us Soriano.

His CF failure moved Jones over, which got us Dome.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 7:16 PM CST up reply actions  

What makes you think Beltran or Vlad would have signed with the Cubs...

…short of Hendry adding two years to his offer, as he later did with Soriano?

In the nearly 40 year history of modern free agency, the Cubs have signed exactly five premium or almost-premium position players: Kingman, Dawson, Bell, Alou, and Soriano. Of these, only Hawk had the all-around game that Beltran and Guerrero offered in 2003-04, and as we know, Dawson sought refuge at Wrigley only to protect his knees from the shock of Astroturf.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Dec 12, 2011 9:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Because Vlad was begging for an offer?

The maker for Guerrero was inexplicably cold after 2003. He’d hurt his back at some point prior, but he had returned healthy. He signed a deal that was universally regarded as cheap at the time.

Beltran was also begging for an offer. (through Boras, but still- it was enough talk that Hendry was forced to comment.) Obviously, he would not have been cheap. But they demonstrated 24 months later that they had enough cash to outbid NYM- soriano’s deal was 18mm bigger.

The Cubs failure to sign free agents isn’t due to Chicago being unattractive for ball players- it’s been due to the Cubs’ running a horrific organization and playing losing baseball – no one wants to sign up for that- and it’s been due to an almost total lack of effort and vision from several consecutive front offices.

When you intentionally target second tier players in an attempt to save cash (prior to 2006-ish) or due to an philosophy that spending on 2 above average players beats spending on 1 elite one (2006-2011), you don’t chase after or land any big fish.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 11:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Autocorrect - the "market" was cold....

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

clicking on that headline

I thought, “which Japanese team will it be?”

by PrincetonCubs on Dec 12, 2011 9:46 AM CST reply actions  

Ham Fighters

Is an awesome team name. I know it’s the Nippon Ham____Fighters, but Ham Fighters is a much better image.

by EcoGeek on Dec 12, 2011 10:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Do you know

How to build a flux capacitor?

by EcoGeek on Dec 12, 2011 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Where we're going... we don't need roads.

"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."

by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST

by fsuapollo on Dec 12, 2011 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Wait it out - he's only got a few years left as a "teen heartthrob".

Only Justin Timberlake Himself ever figured out how to keep that gig going longer than 5 years.

Unfortunately there are an unlimited supply of teen heartthrobs. No matter how many time machines we invent, there will always be a Bieber, or a NSync, or a Backstreet Boys, or a New Kids, or a That Kid from Home Improvement, or a Leif Garrett, and so on and so on, back to the invention of teenagers.

Far easier to just completely ignore teenagers and everything they like.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 12, 2011 1:23 PM CST up reply actions  

And before that....

David Cassady, Bobby Sherman, Paul Anka, Neil Sedaka and Bobby Vinton.

On the plus side, the Beatles and Frank Sinatra were big teen heartthrobs.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 12, 2011 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I was for one day

the day he hit that big homer against the Cards. Otherwise – meh.

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Dec 12, 2011 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

he also threw a guy out at the plate

I think in his very first game. Nice arm

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Dec 12, 2011 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I like how he wore his wristbands.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 12, 2011 4:08 PM CST up reply actions  

remember when he hit better than the flying spaghetti monster in august of 09

and everyone was freaking out that pie finally figured it out?

good times

THEOOOOOOOOO (and Hoyer)

by jesus christos on Dec 12, 2011 4:38 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  997 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima