Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Written by me for Baseball Nation. (Hint: the answer is "no".)

6 months ago Alyellontoppscard_tiny Al Yellon 130 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Not

until he has his appeal. But if he loses his appeal then he should lose his award. There have been other award winners suspected of juicing, but nothing this clear-cut.

But hey, I’m biased.

by tomas21 on Dec 13, 2011 11:00 AM CST reply actions  

So then

… do you retroactively strip all PED users? Bonds has been convicted. Take away all his MVPs? Clemens, if he’s convicted, take away all his CYAs?

Slippery slope, IMO.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 13, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

agreed

may addition by subtraction be real

by N Oakley on Dec 13, 2011 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Definitely

if Braun is proven to be guilty, its much different than mere suspicions, as strong as they.

I think the appeal needs to go through though, and all the facts come out, before anything can be determined definitively.

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 13, 2011 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

What about A-Rod?

He admitted to using PEDs. I guess I don’t know what awards he won, if any, during the time he admitted use.

by varrys on Dec 13, 2011 1:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Had MLB changed their policies for the period A-Rod

copped to? I can’t remember.

may addition by subtraction be real

by N Oakley on Dec 13, 2011 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

That's the point I was trying to make.

He was caught red-handed and had a positive test taken during the year of his award campaign. Stripping other awards is much messier. This is pretty easy.

Does it open the topic of discussion about other awards? Sure, but that is baseball’s fault for kowtowing the the players union on the drug issue for so long.

by tomas21 on Dec 13, 2011 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

No, you still don't get it

Braun did not test positive during his “award winning season”. He tested positive during the post season. And it is only a point-in-time test. And it does not prove if he was a PED user or he ate/drank something that caused the test results. It doesn’t matter – unless overturned, 50 game suspension and move on.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought the test was supposedly administered

at the end of last season, not over the off season.

may addition by subtraction be real

by N Oakley on Dec 13, 2011 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

It was during the playoffs

From the orignal ESPN report

The 28-year-old Braun had to provide a urine sample for testing during the playoffs, and he was notified of the positive test sometime in late October — about a month before he was named the National League’s most valuable player.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

NO you dont taqke it away

just as you dont start taking away wins and loses for teams that had people on greenies, steroids, lsd, et al. the test result was too late to say with out a shadow of a doubt that he used during the season

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 13, 2011 6:22 PM CST up reply actions  

apples and oranges

Taking away wins, as they do in college sports for example, would be great, but is simply impractical.

Winning an award, such as MVP, is an honor. Those who are caught cheating should be ineligible.

This isn’t really all that novel. Reggie Bush’s Heisman? Revoked. The 1981 Pulitzer prize for Feature writing, Revoked. Milli Vanilli’s Grammy, you got it, revoked.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Dec 13, 2011 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

nice try

but you cannot compare them to MLB, none of them can be.

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 13, 2011 10:59 PM CST up reply actions  

for starters

most palyers have a clause in their contract for a bonus with a MVP win. unlike ANY of those others, the MLBPA would get involved due to taking away the bonus.

how can you compare NCAA Football to MLB? One is college, no pay (cough) the other is professional with pay, agents, contracts, et al.

Can you really compare a music award or a writing to baseball? these are not even in the same general area of each other.

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

So because it's not baseball...

You can’t compare events where people lost awards after cheating was discovered?

by Arbusto on Dec 14, 2011 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

the others named do not have a Union for starters

the entire process would likely have to be done in much different manners.

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not a Ryan Braun fan...

But I dislike how this information got leaked via ESPN no less. It is my understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, that The Office of the Commissioner and MLB Player’s Assocation are prohibited from publicly disclosing information about a player’s test results.

If Braun did test positive and he violated the MLB drug policy then I think he should be punished with a 50 game suspension and that he should have his MVP Award stripped from him. The reason why I think he should be stripped of his NL MVP Award is because if he was using substances to artifically inflate his statistics, he was cheating. And I don’t see how you can suspend a guy for 50 games without pay, but then come back and say that he’s the Most Valuable Player. Personally I thought that Matt Kemp should have won the MVP Award as a lot of people did, but I didn’t have a problem with Ryan Braun winning the award. I just think that MLB needs to set an example by punishing Braun harshly because if they don’t this is going to keep happening.

You take away his MVP Award and you set an example to other players that if you violate the league’s drug policy, you will pay the same price. I just hope that Braun is innocent because if he did do something wrong I think he should come clean and take the punishment. He’d have to deal with some negative reaction from people for awhile, but that would go away if he stayed clean going forward and put up some good numbers.

by jeffmills1972 on Dec 13, 2011 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

MLBPA would likely step in and fight about stripping it

especially since it likely means a bonus is also stripped.

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 6:54 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't see where they'd have a leg to stand on.

Or why they’d care, considering that someone else (Matt Kemp) would be benefitting from it. It’s zero-sum, as far as the MLBPA is concerned.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 14, 2011 8:56 AM CST up reply actions  

i would think they would get involved to protect their Union Member

even with a zero sum as noted. I was a teamster (not anywhere near as strong, i know) and from my experience I see no reason why they would not go to bat for him.

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 11:12 AM CST up reply actions  

How can the MLBPA say anything whatsoever to the BBWAA about its voting processes?

What could they possibly do? Threaten to have their players boycott all baseball writers?

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 14, 2011 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

with possible bonus' involved

i am sure that there would be something MLB, MLBPA and BBWAA would all have to go over, possible with outside arbitration, collectively?

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

i think that is trying to make it more simple than it is

and i could be wrong, just as well as you could, we are speculating about all the fine details. we dont know what is done behind the scenes, but i would bet that since contracts have clauses for post season awards frm the BBWAA, it is not as simple as “we want to change our vote now” without MLB and MLBPA having issues, and doing something about it

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 14, 2011 1:26 PM CST up reply actions  

absolutely...

he took a banned substance. If MLB bans a substance and still allows him to keep the MVP award its saying that it doesnt matter what you do to get the award, we’ll reward it.

and to answer your question about retroactively: when were PEDs Banned in the MLB rules?

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Dec 13, 2011 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

MLB

It’s not MLB’s place to allow him or not allow him to keep his MVP award. MLB has as much place to strip Braun of his MVP award as it has to strip Mark Zuckerberg of his “Time Magazine Person of the Year” award. This award belongs to the Baseball Writers Association of America and is awarded by that organization. While MLB and the BBWAA work together, its up to the BBWAA to make this decision.

by dmlichte on Dec 13, 2011 11:12 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

well then in that case...

my position still stands. except take the MLB and change it for BBWAA… because if BBWAA are going to honor a cheater then they are idiots.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Dec 13, 2011 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

I think MLB did try to strip Mark Zuckerberg of his Time Magazine Person of the Year award

And award it of course to Bud Selig. And order him up a Noble for something while we’re at it.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

That's really hard

to do since there are no rules in place for the BBWAA to strip him of the award. If Braun loses his appeal, then the only way would be if he voluntarily gives up the award and I don’t see him doing that.

by Swoosie on Dec 13, 2011 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

Correct answer:

Yes, if Braun loses his appeal and has to serve a 50-day suspension due to testing positive for a banned substance during the season for which he won the MVP.

If there isn’t a price for cheating, why should players stop?

by ClarkFan on Dec 13, 2011 11:26 AM CST reply actions  

you answered yourself

The price to pay is the 50 day suspension – the award has a lot less meaning than getting banned from the game

by El Borto on Dec 13, 2011 12:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Contract Bonus

If Brewers owe money for performance what do they do?

Per Cotts
price of option may increase to $20M based on MVP, Silver Slugger, Gold Glove awards (if earned, award escalators are deferred without interest)

by courtsteve on Dec 13, 2011 6:59 PM CST up reply actions  

MVP carries a place in the history of baseball, like, say, HR records

If you get to keep them, 1/3 of a year’s salary isn’t much pain for a deca-millionaire.

by ClarkFan on Dec 13, 2011 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

This is cut and dry.

If found guilty, yes.

If innocent, no.

Kemp was the friggin’ better player anyway, I told you that from the minute the season ended.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 11:27 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Of course you do

This isn’t Bonds’ MLB anymore. This is the cleaned up version void of all PED’s…right? Void that thing and give it to Kemp.

by Cody Sharp on Dec 13, 2011 11:35 AM CST reply actions  

No

What if we find out later that Matt Kemp used?

Third place was Prince Fielder. Is it not possible that whatever positive benefit Braun got, his at-bats helped Fielder? I don’t even know who fourth place was.

Now, something that CAN be done is the Brewers should have the right (or be required by MLB, if they don’t want to make those waves with Braun) to demand return of any bonus Braun received for winning the MVP.

Now, whether this extends to Kemp having the right to claim any bonus (and that might be something MLBPA argues) is up for debate. Some guys have clauses that say if they finish as low as FIFTH in the MVP vote, the get a few bucks. Does removing Braun move those guys up?

All slippery slope stuff, but if you’re looking for real penalties, that would be one way to do it.

"It's all in the game, yo"

by Worf on Dec 13, 2011 11:36 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

This is a good point

At what point do we stop? When does the “juicing” statute of limitations run out?

Braun is the MVP. I would have voted for Kemp in the first place, but I’m not in favor of changing it now.

by Josh Timmers on Dec 13, 2011 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

completely disagree

The statute of limitations? Braun tested positive during his MVP season. Period. If he tested positive in Spring Training, during 2012, or 2015, those would be different discussions. MLB knows who tested positive during 2011, and those that did not should not be eligible.

This really isn’t all that hard IMHO

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Dec 13, 2011 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Braun tested positive during his MVP season.

Yet to be definitively determined.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 13, 2011 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Jerry Sandusky is still innocent, FYI.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

No... I'm pretty sure that's exactly what is being compared here.

I took it as, “Braun is as likely to be innocent as Sandusky is.” Which would be comparing the outcome of a possible PED used to a possible sexual predator.

by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2011 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

That's how I took it, too.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 13, 2011 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

hmmm.

That’s a bit larger than I expected.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

TWSS

Author at Acme Packing Company, SB Nation's Green Bay Packers blog.

State high point count: 4/50

If you are grouchy, irritable, or just plain mean, there will be a $10 charge for putting up with you.

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Dec 15, 2011 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Sure

I am very much a proponent of innocent until proven guilty. No question, if he wins his appeal, this is a moot point. But, if the initial reports stand… then yes, he tested positive during his MVP campaign.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Dec 13, 2011 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

His blood testosterone was 4 times the legal limit.

Short of an unprecedented lab error, he’s been using PEDs.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 14, 2011 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Wrong - there was no blood test and there is no legal limit

A urine sample was provided and the initial test showed that Braun had a testosterone to epitestosterone ratio that too high. A second test performed by the World Anti-Doping Agency lab in Montreal determined that the increased testosterone came from outside his body and was not naturally.

It is possible for someone to produce a naturally higher testosterone to epitestosterone ratio.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 14, 2011 9:50 AM CST up reply actions  

I was attempting a mixed metaphor there. Using BAC terminology. I guess if I have to explain it, it didn't work.

There is, however, a maximum acceptable T:E ratio for these sorts of things.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 14, 2011 10:11 AM CST up reply actions  

There's a T:E ratio that shows something may be wrong

But it’s determining that the testosterone is synthetic that probably got Braun in trouble.

If you can show that you naturally produce a higher T:E ratio, you should not be flagged.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 14, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Not True

Braun tested positive during the post-season. Not during his MVP season, which is based on the regular season.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

THIS

And it’s a very small but important distinction. He was never positive for any PEDs until October, meaning his regular season tests all came out clean.

by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2011 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.

If players get tested at least 3 times and no more than 6 times, then the odds are it would have come up during the regular season if he had been doing whatever it is.

by varrys on Dec 13, 2011 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

When in October is actually crucial

If he tested positive 5 days after the end of the regular season than he was likely using during the season.

The bottom is loaded with nice people, Albert. Only cream and bastards rise

by Doggie Stalker on Dec 13, 2011 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

That's close

But close is only good enough for horseshoes and hand grenades.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Post-season is still part of the season

Yes, I understand that it is a regular season award. But, he still cheated, allegedly, during the 2011 MLB season.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Dec 13, 2011 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

In Braun's case, timing is a factor

Braun was tested during the post-season. He was probably tested when the BBWAA voters were casting their ballots. So there is no way the writers could have known the test results.

And this isn’t MLB’s issue to decide. It’s the writer’s award and the writers need to decide if they want strip away awards. If they do want to strip the award, they should have a stated policy first.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 8:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Easy workaround, Worf.

You don’t “give” the award to Kemp, you have a revote. Problem solved. And Kemp wins.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

exactly

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 13, 2011 6:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

If he loses his appeal, he cheated during his award winning season. He loses the award.

If he wins his appeal, then he keeps the award.

It’s pretty cut and dry to me.

by ZeoBandit on Dec 13, 2011 11:37 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe

♪ He held me very tight under stars so bright and whispered darlin' "Who do you love tonight?" I told him "baseball, baseball...." ♫

by katie casey on Dec 13, 2011 11:53 AM CST reply actions  

Yes.

At some point, the MLB has to take a stand. Going back to Bonds, Sosa, and such shouldn’t happen. But the MLB should make Braun an example, if it’s proven he’s guilty.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 13, 2011 11:53 AM CST reply actions  

MLB?

How can MLB take a stand? Its not their award to take away. They’re taking a stand by forcing Braun to miss almost 1/3 of next season and he now faces stiffer penalties. They’ve made him an example. If the BBWAA wants to do the same, more power to them, but MLB has done all that it can.

Now if people really want to get mad at MLB, get mad at the sport for allowing Manny Ramirez to return to the sport and only miss 50 of the 100 game suspension that was initially handed to him.

by dmlichte on Dec 13, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Fine.

At some point, the BBWAA has to take a stand. Going back to Bonds, Sosa, and such shouldn’t happen. But the BBWAA should make Braun an example, if it’s proven he’s guilty.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 13, 2011 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Should he be - yes

Will he be – no

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Dec 13, 2011 12:09 PM CST reply actions  

When do we start holding the teams accountable?

Does anyone else think that the team (the Brewers in this case) should be held accountable for this in some way?

What the ?!?

by kerry wood's hot tub on Dec 13, 2011 12:24 PM CST reply actions  

Unless there was absolute proof of use in the clubhouse...

Why hold a team liable for an individual’s actions? If someone shot up in the dugout, fine. If someone dopes at home, how can the team know for certain?

Or are you saying that maybe this will lead to teams implementing stricter policies on their own? “Okay, MLB tests you 3 times a season, but we’re having tests every other week”?

by varrys on Dec 13, 2011 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that it is virtually impossible for teams to know for certain....

This reminds me of the scene in The Program when Lattimer is lifting weights and losing his mind. The coaches all know what is going on, but the program needs to win…so let’s look the other direction.

I know it is no where near that dramatic in Braun’s case, but I have a hard time believing that no one in that clubhouse knew what was going on…..

If he is innocent, this is all just speculation, but that’s what we are here for.

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." - ---The one and only Harry Caray

by kerry wood's hot tub on Dec 13, 2011 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Do I take this as a compliment?

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." - ---The one and only Harry Caray

by kerry wood's hot tub on Dec 14, 2011 9:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, they should be punished!

Maybe we can take away their best player for 1/3rd of the season next year to teach them a lesson?

by Wreckard on Dec 13, 2011 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Why am I supposed to care?

As if baseball is the only arena where people cheat?

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 13, 2011 12:32 PM CST reply actions  

I'm always the banker in Monopoly.

And I quit when somebody realizes I’m stealing.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

That's why It's better to be the banker in real life...

you don’t have to quit when somebody realizes you’re stealing.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 13, 2011 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

POLITICAL!!!!

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Dec 13, 2011 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I laughed at this.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

You cheat with Pizza?

The bottom is loaded with nice people, Albert. Only cream and bastards rise

by Doggie Stalker on Dec 13, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Everything is relative for Drew.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 13, 2011 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

FTFY

Everything is relative for Drew.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 13, 2011 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

nope

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Dec 13, 2011 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

There's a real important consideration here nobody's mentioned: The NFL has dealt with this before.

Brian Cushing cheated, won the ROY, and they revoted. And he won it again. I’m fairly certain somebody’s going to respond with “yeahbutthatstheNFLthisisMLB”; and to that I say, the MLB policy on drugs is by far the worst, maybe they should follow somebody that knows what the hell they are doing.

Dan

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 13, 2011 12:42 PM CST reply actions  

I gotta say no.

In addition to the good point Worf made above, the real punishment is the 50 game suspension.

The award is from the BBWAA, not MLB. If BBWAA wants to revoke the award that is for them as an organization to determine. The only thing MLB can really do is punish a player after the incident. Now that those punishments are steep, and (hopefully) testing is legitimate, I think we will see fewer of these incidents.

Furthermore, Braun hasn’t been found guilty. I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up not guilty. This case doesn’t seem cut and dry. I’m sure it will be an interesting and tumultuous appeal process.

by El Borto on Dec 13, 2011 12:46 PM CST reply actions  

How does the case not seem cut-and-dry?

It’s exactly like every single other instance of a player being caught with something in their system. Vague statements from the players’ camp about how the results were flawed, followed by conclusive proof that they were not.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Dec 14, 2011 9:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Not for doing PEDs

but he should for being a cocky SOB and lying about it.

“I’d hit 60-70 HRs if I took steriods.”

You should’ve come clean just how you mentioned A-Rod should have. Hypocrite.

"I'm sore and I'm pissed off. I'm a baller. I want to feel the leather. I love thumb wars. 6-8 weeks? 6. follow me for healing, Jay Cutler does" - Jaysthumb twitter acct

by propheteer on Dec 13, 2011 12:59 PM CST reply actions  

I have to say No on stripping away the MVP

What we have are two positive tests – the initial testosterone levels test, and the sythentic testosterone test – from one urine sample in the post-season. Braun could have been doing steroids all during the 2011 season, or there could be a myriad of other possibilities for why he failed these tests. It doesn’t matter; he’s still responsible for the failed tests unless he can prove an error in the process. If he can’t prove the error, he serves the 50 game suspension and moves on.

But in no way does the information that we have right now indicate that Braun was taking steroids during the 2011 season. We have we have are two positive tests from one urine sample in the post-season. We don’t have Barry Bonds treatment calendar al BALCO.

As much as I wanted Koyie Hill to win the MVP, I still can’t see stripping Braun of it.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 1:05 PM CST reply actions  

Off Season

So if he fails a test in March there is no punishment?

by courtsteve on Dec 13, 2011 7:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Sure there is "punishment"

It’s the 50 game suspension, which Braun will serve in 2012 if he can’t get the tests overturned. It doesn’t matter if the tests occur in October, March, or June.

What the writers do with the awards is completely separate. If the test results hold up, does anyone really think that the writers would vote for Braun for MVP in 2012?

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 13, 2011 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Just to throw a squirrel into a room full of dogs...

If the BBWAA can’t revoke the honor, should a player who is proven to have tested positive for a PED in the past be eligible for season awards in future years? Or maybe just prior winners.

Everyone seems to consider MVP awards, placement in final voting, gold gloves and silver sluggers so much when contemplating a player for the HOF, how should this be handled?

may addition by subtraction be real

by N Oakley on Dec 13, 2011 1:39 PM CST reply actions  

I suppose this is just hearsay but,

I heard on MLBN yesterday that of the 14 appeal cases regarding PED, 0 won. It was also said though that there has been 1 case (never made public) that was overturned. I have no idea how to substantiate this since it was kept in house. It almost seems improbable to me given the access and ease of media. Then again, pre-Twitter era…

If that’s the case, and this was leaked “out of school”, we may see something brand new (to us) in the coming days. Begging the question, how many other times could this have happened, without any of us aware?

by Tat14 on Dec 13, 2011 2:02 PM CST reply actions  

XM interviewed a former teammate of Braun

who had a positive test for elevated testosterone in the minors. He appealed and won.

I didn’t get to hear the whole interview, only snippets, but essentially he said there was something about alcohol that could throw testosterone levels out of whack and that’s what he used and won the appeal.

I’m hoping someone else heard this and may be able to offer more details.

by ScottT on Dec 13, 2011 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

The drinking defense is a fallacy and incorrect...
In his book The Testosterone Factor: A Practical Guide to Improving Vitality and Virility, Naturally, Toronto doctor Shafiq Qaadri says that alcohol promotes the destruction of the hormone testosterone.

"That first drink of alcohol will actually increase your testosterone level. That good feeling you get is part of the temptation to drink. But alcohol encourages the conversion of testosterone into estrogen, which takes place in abdominal fat cells," Qaadri writes. "Alcohol also acts as a direct irritant to the testes. After its first rush through your body, alcohol will immediately lower your T production."

by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2011 4:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Not sure what to tell you

other than it’s the defense the guy used and won his case.

by ScottT on Dec 13, 2011 4:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's a link.

Can’t listen to it at work. Like I say, I only heard snippets. His name is Brendan Katin

Brendan Katin, Brewers minor leaguer who successfully appealled a 2007 drug suspension joined MLB Roundtrip with Mike Ferrin and Cliff Floyd and taked about his experience and situation on MLB Network Radio

by ScottT on Dec 13, 2011 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I'd heard that as well.

I just don’t understand the connection though, since it has been proven scientifically false.

If there is more to this than I’ve read, can some other people throw some links out there to clarify? Obviously there must be something if baseball bought this guys side of the story.

by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2011 4:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Finally got a chance to listen to the interview

Brendan doesn’t say definitively that it was alcohol, he’s just surmising that was what caused the increased levels.

Now, whether that’s true or not, I have no clue. I’m not a chemist. Still if the reports are true that Braun tested at a ration 12 times normal testosterone, then it certainly seems a lot fishier than a couple of drinks, even if it did have that effect.

I’d guess you’d see even more drunken bar brawls if alcohol routinely jacked up testosterone to that level.

by ScottT on Dec 14, 2011 8:00 AM CST up reply actions  

No.

They haven’t pulled HR records for Sosa, McGwire and Bonds away, why this.

by Grockcubs on Dec 13, 2011 2:37 PM CST reply actions  

If he is found to have "cheated"...

…and the BBWAA do NOT strip him of his MVP, then that should open the H of F doors to the likes of Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, Palmierro, Clemens, Manny, etc…right? If not, then there’s something seriously wrong going on.

"Keep looking into the past and you'll keep repeating the past" - Some Smart Guy

by Easy Ed on Dec 13, 2011 3:03 PM CST reply actions  

The

question is premature. It can not be answered until it is found to be true or false.

by wild bill on Dec 13, 2011 3:11 PM CST reply actions  

Do you want fun?

Ryne “Saint of Wrigley” Sandberg never wound up in scandal. And he still can’t be our manager?!

WTF!

by Tat14 on Dec 13, 2011 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

RESPECK!

"It's all in the game, yo"

by Worf on Dec 13, 2011 3:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Doping is crap.


If the Cubs still have a chance, no matter how small, it’s still Go Cubs, damn the math and pass the KoolAid. I'm a Sheeple and proud of it!
Spelling and grammar errors are included for creative and artistic reasons.

by eths on Dec 13, 2011 4:27 PM CST reply actions  

I think that, if found guilty,

the fact that his reputation will forever be tarnished is worth enough to me. The whole stripping people of things is too much of a slippery slope IMO. So what he has an MVP trophy, everybody will know he doesn’t deserve it and his respect from a fan’s standpoint will be all but gone.

Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser. --Vince Lombardi

by KS_Cub4Life on Dec 13, 2011 7:20 PM CST reply actions  

I think it's a bit early to make claims of stripping away his reward

We don’t even know what kind of “illegal substance” he got busted for, we don’t even know the whole MLB list of forbidden substances. I mean the way I look at it, there’s a fine line between supplements that don’t make much of a difference in regards to performance (most protein based supplements barely make any difference, your better off with a glass of milk after a workout), and the likes of anabolic steroids and human growth hormones. If Braun got busted taking HGH or anabolics, then maybe we do need to look into this, but if it was something small, diet pills, protein based supplements, etc., I don’t think it’s enough to make much of a difference or enough to strip someone of their award.

UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA DI Men's Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Victoria Concordia Crescit"

by bmasson11 on Dec 13, 2011 10:10 PM CST reply actions  

I don't think he will or should be stripped

If he loses his appeal, that will just ensure that there’s a healthy asterisk married to his MVP. This is still the PED/Steroid era, and unless they erase Barry Bonds’ and Roger Clemens’ names from the record books, all of their awards will remain. They will be marred, of course, but they will remain.

by BoilerUp1982 on Dec 14, 2011 7:32 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  997 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima