Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

BCB Interview: Tom Ricketts, Part 3

Pitcher Carlos Zambrano of the Chicago Cubs looks to first base during the game against the Atlanta Braves at Turner Field in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Mike Zarrilli/Getty Images)

In the last of this three-part interview with Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts, we cover various topics including ticket prices, the policy on rainouts, Carlos Zambrano, the overall baseball budget, Dale Sveum, Ryne Sandberg, Mike Quade and more.

Note: this interview was conducted before the details of the new MLB/MLBPA collective bargaining agreement were made public -- at the time, Tom Ricketts didn't have any information on the new draft rules so he didn't want to make any comment on them, but I included that in this transcript to note that I did ask about it.

Star-divide


BCB: Let's move on to baseball related things. You’re anticipating the overall baseball budget to be pretty much the same as it was a year ago or a little increase? Decrease?

TR: In the same ballpark. How the baseball budget is determined is you take all the dollars you bring in, pay all your expenses and you give everything else to the baseball guys.

BCB: When you say expenses you’re talking about paying nonplaying employees?

TR: Yes.

BCB: Travel, electric bills, overhead…

TR: All the expenses that go with the overhead of running the team. And then after you’ve paid all of those, that goes to baseball and then it’ll be Theo’s job to decide how to allocate that within, in baseball. Whether it goes to on field payroll, whether it goes to amateur signings, international signings, expanded scouting. Whatever he decides.

BCB: Do you have any sense whether the major league payroll will be a little higher, a little lower, about the same as last year?

TR: You know, I don’t have a final number on that. It’ll be Theo’s call.

BCB: And he won’t talk about it. He made that clear.

TR: Well, he makes it clear that… it’s just not something that most teams talk about in advance.

BCB: In relation to that, in terms of the new collective bargaining agreement that was just signed where there is now supposed to be some sort of luxury tax for over-slot signings, do you think that will have an effect on future international signings or draft signings? Last year you did over-slot for quite a few signings.

TR: You know, it’s really hard to say. I haven’t seen any language that is in this year’s collective bargaining agreement yet so I don’t want to speculate on how that impacts teams. If the rules change somewhat on signing players, we’ll just adapt to them and be the best we can be regardless of what the underlying ground rules are.

BCB: In other words, if there were a luxury tax and you still wanted to make the signings you want to make, you would consider still doing them?

TR: Once again, I don’t know. I don’t know what the rules are, and if it got to that point it would be a decision for the baseball guys if that was the best allocation for their dollars.

BCB: You definitely make a statement the last draft and Theo said that they watched it while he was still in Boston and said: "They get it."

TR: I think that as a team we’ve probably under-invested for a while now. I think there was a little too much emphasis on getting the last piece on the major league club and that cost us in the dollars that were available for our amateur signings. I think that our draft guys did a pretty good job, given the constraints. But this year we looked at it and said let’s go ahead and try to get a few more high ceiling guys. A few guys who want a little more money over-slot and start really restocking the system with guys that may be real contributors at the major league level.

BCB: The added hirings that have been made, the new scouting director and various other people, I assume that’s also Theo’s call. That also comes out of the one big baseball budget that he’s given whenever he wants to hire new scouts and whenever he wants to expand the baseball department?

TR: Yes, that comes out of the baseball budget. Obviously they brought in Theo, then Jed and Jason [McLeod] and then Joe [Bohringer] and Shiraz [Rehman] have all come in and we’ve also blended them in with some of the guys that were already here. So, it’s definitely in their budget and actually it’s great. I think it’s great that we’re building a little more depth in our baseball staff.

BCB: Where are you putting everybody?

TR: We are space constrained, that's for sure. The good news is these guys travel a lot so we actually can figure out where to fit them. It is a need.

BCB: Regarding ticket sales, what do you hear or know about season ticket renewals? How are they going? Because I heard that some of the deadlines actually were extended for people that hadn’t paid their deposit yet.

TR: The ticket sales are very strong. We’re very, very happy. We asked for people’s deposit to come in much earlier than usual. If they missed, we just want to make sure that if anyone missed the deadline it wasn’t because they didn’t know. So that’s what you’re hearing.

BCB: And this year you’ve offered upgrades to people who might want to change locations.

TR: The nice part about getting a feel for who’s renewing their season tickets earlier is you can find out people who aren’t renewing and then move people down to their seats. It gives us a little more time to kind of shift people around if possible. I’m not sure how many seats are available for the relocations but we just want to have an orderly a process as possible. Knowing a little earlier helps us with that a lot.

BCB: Any thoughts about, because we’ve talked about this a couple of times, of readjusting the policy on rainouts?

TR: No recent discussions. We’ve talked internally, but we haven’t made any decisions.

BCB:
Obviously all over baseball rainouts were a problem this past season.

TR: 2011 from a weather perspective is one we all want to forget.

BCB: Last year, after Carlos Zambrano was asked to leave, when you were asked whether he’d be back, you said on TV, something to the extent of you’d find it very difficult to see him in a Cubs uniform again. And then Theo has laid out some ground work for him to maybe work his way back to the team.

TR: I forget the exact words I used on that television broadcast. The fact is we were very disappointed in his behavior and it wasn’t the first time we’ve been disappointed in his behavior, so at the time, it was just a matter of, well, it’s just really hard to imagine he’s really coming back in the near future. But it’s really Theo’s decision. I think that Carlos wants to be a Cub and he wants to do what’s right. We’ll leave it up to the baseball guys to manage it from there.

BCB:
What would you say, then, is the biggest difference between having Theo and Jed in charge of the baseball operations and Jim Hendry running the baseball operations?

TR: It’s still pretty early. I haven’t had a lot of time to compare the two styles, but one thing I can say is that I think we have a much bigger team now. We have a lot more guys that are looking at the problems more collectively, a few more people in each meeting. I think ultimately there will be a lot more analytical decisions. Not that Jim didn’t use analysis when he felt it was appropriate, but I think that it’ll be something that Theo and Jed will lean on a lot more than maybe Jim would have. But it’s still too early to tell the complete differences between the two baseball cultures. Outside of that, there’s a lot of energy. The guys are really on a mission here and I think it’s going to be pretty exciting to watch.

BCB: You met with Dale Sveum after they told you he was their choice. What’s your impression of him after having talked to him?

TR: I like Dale a lot. What you see is what you get. He’s a straightforward baseball guy. He has pretty full analysis when you ask him certain baseball questions. And he’s just a stand-up guy. I think players are really going to respond to him.

BCB: What was the feeling of the players when they found out Mike Quade wasn’t going to be back?

TR: I haven’t spoken to any players on that.

BCB: I don’t think any fans were surprised.

TR: Mike did his best and I wouldn’t say anything other than Mike was the right guy for the job when we made the decision. He did his best with a lot of headwinds last year. I wish him all the best and I’m sure he’ll do very well in baseball for a long time.

BCB: What do you say to the people who are upset that Ryne Sandberg wasn’t even going to be considered?

TR: The manager decision was in Theo’s court. He had his reasons for focusing on a certain kind of candidate and he just executed. It’s nothing against Sandberg or anything he’s done in the past or a reflection on what the Cubs think of him as a player or a person, it’s just what Theo was looking for at the time.

BCB: Any final words of wisdom for Cubs fans?

TR: I think most fans understand that to really get the organization heading in the right direction, it doesn’t happen overnight. That said, you get a few good off season moves and you have guys who stay healthy next year and anything can happen. We’re excited about next season, but we’re really excited about our future as we go forward. Some of the lower profile but very smart decisions that we make will start to pay off over time and fans should know that their baseball team is in good hands. We have the right guys running the organization.

Comment 351 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I really

Like his comments in his last paragraph i.e low profile moves. Nicely done Al.

by wild bill on Dec 28, 2011 8:12 AM CST reply actions  

Fielder?

the only big fish left…I hope they at least make an effort to sign him…otherwise gonna be a downer for a few years while we rebuild.

by QuincyCub on Dec 28, 2011 8:15 AM CST reply actions  

I think the answer was between the lines with how money is allocated

They are cutting at the MLB payroll level to pay for the investment throughout the organization. $25M is too much right now.

I think they are going for a $400K solution and invest the remaining money throughout the system and spread it throughout the payroll.

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Dec 28, 2011 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Tom needs to add some reality to the ticket situation

If the Cubs do not sign Fielder and the payroll comes in at around 100 to 105 million, that will be approx 25 million less than last year and 40 million less than 2009/2010.

The Cubs continue to charge Top 5 ticket prices in the same range as the Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies and Angels. Ricketts need to get a grip on reality and slash the ticket prices for 2012. Look at this roster, you can’t with a straight face charge the same prices as those other four teams. Slash the prices by at least 15 to 20%, it’s only fair as you enter rebuilding mode. It’s boderline criminal the prices the Cubs are charging this year when you look at this team. Season ticket holders should be irate and really need to start calling the Cubs now.

Who do they expect to buy single game tickets in March, who is gonna spend that kind money on a team projected for 90 to 100 losses?

by MikeJW on Dec 28, 2011 8:19 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Sadly...

At this point from an economic situation, even with the no-shows, they have to find that spot where they can maximize profit. If they can raise the prices 10% and get only 1% No-show (just throwing numbers out there) that’s more money for the team than filling the stadium by discounting ticket sales.

I don’t like it any more than anyone else, but if they spend and don’t get results that’s even dumber than trying to build a solid ballclub from the beginning.

Late in the season, in the midst of an inning and it’s just past the top of the hour so Pat mentions that we’re due for a station break. Ron kinda mumbles "Didn’t we just have one of those?" and without missing a beat Pat says "About an hour ago."

by Champaign Cubbies on Dec 28, 2011 8:22 AM CST up reply actions  

It's not the no-shows they need to worry about

… it’s the “no-buys”.

It appears they are going through a pretty good chunk of the season ticket waiting list this year. I wonder what that will mean for single game sales in March.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 8:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Al, can you imagine the 22 year old girl at the window

give me four bleachers for the white sox and four bleachers for the Saturday Reds game. Sure, that will be $688.00, good luck with that.

by MikeJW on Dec 28, 2011 8:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I can

“Sure, here’s daddy’s credit card. Thanks!”

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 28, 2011 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Sad, but true.

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 28, 2011 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I moved up over 3,000 places to the top of the list...

….and will be at Wrigley in January to pick my seats. I look at it as spending a couple of years laying the groundwork for what hopefully will be an exciting thereafter. We shall see.

"You put up with a few minor inconveniences when you live in a condemned building."

by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on Dec 28, 2011 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, if you moved up 3,000 places to the top

that means everyone else beneath you moved up 3,000 spots too. This means I get there in 10 years, just in time for my move back to Chicago.

by JFCubFan on Dec 28, 2011 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

See my sig line. We got the letter from the Cubs for the January event too.

So they are digging deep into wait list.

There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary and there are 108 stitches in a baseball. Who says baseball isn't a religion? (Now #8452 in the Cubs Season Ticket Wait List...)

by Zeke on Dec 28, 2011 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

this is the stuff that turns fans against owners fast

and Tom’s first two years have been horrible on the field and the next couple don’t look better. He needs to understand that and lower the ticket prices until the payroll comes back up and they start putting a contender on the field.

by MikeJW on Dec 28, 2011 8:26 AM CST up reply actions  

A reduction in major league team payroll shouldn't necessarily = a redecution in ticket prices.

The Cubs are still spending that money on the baseball side, it’s just shifting toward scouting and player development…. which is very necessary for this organizational transformation.

If the ticket prices are in-line with the marketplace, why should the Cubs reduce prices prior to the season? I would understand if the Cubs were charging more than the market value, but in this case you can’t really say they are when people are willing to pay for them.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions  

True enough.

And some prices have been reduced.

I think his point is — and I agree with it — that unless Prince Fielder is signed, a signing that would energize the casual fanbase, it is going to be very difficult to sell tickets at these prices to those people, coming off two bad years in a row.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

If it is difficult for the Cubs to sell tickets at that price

Then, it would be determined they are asking more than the current market value. And this is what most of us predict. However, I imagine that they’ve had a number of discussions backed by some analysis to determine the price. And, it is what is.

I do expect to see several mid-season discounts like last year’s bleacher value days. Which is why I’m not going to invest too much prior to the season. I didn’t get a good value for the tickets I purchased last year.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

The Cubs told us...

…. at the season ticket luncheon last September, that they were considering dynamic pricing on bleacher tickets, but if they did that, they would NOT discount tickets below what STH paid.

I think if they did that, they would risk having a lot more angry people than they already have.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes, the discounts did anger season ticket holders

As well as customers who paid a higher price prior to the season.

If they put together a good value package, I may be interested in that. Otherwise, I may just choose a few select individual games, and then just head to the ballpark whenever I feel like it and grab a cheap bleacher ticket off the street.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

I cannot see them doing the bleacher discounts they did last year.

50% off for almost half the schedule? That pissed off a lot of people.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Yet here you are, renewing again.

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 28, 2011 8:21 PM CST up reply actions  

You again.

Seriously, what is your problem with people wanting to watch baseball? If I choose to renew my tickets, what business is it of yours?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:53 PM CST up reply actions  

bluemike9?

Is he misnamed?

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run FOR Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Dec 28, 2011 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Can you clarify?

Am I reading that right? Are you saying they’re considering dynamic pricing on bleacher tickets but never at a price lower than what STH paid?

IOW, dynamic pricing would only be used to increase the price of an already expensive ticket on the good weather, good opponent, good winning streak good promotion games, but keep it at the baseline, STH levels for the cold, crappy weather, crappy oppenents, long losing streak, RoLo starting games?

Sounds more like semi-dynamic.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it means the flex-pricing will be even more dyanmic

With less desirable dates priced significantly lower. But that price goes for everyone… STH, flex-pack buyers, individual tix buyers, and mid-season prices.

So, if they need to offer mid-season promotions to fill seats, they’ll have to offer discounts on concessions and other merchandise, not tickets.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Right.

As they did last year with the bleacher promotional days. I would expect them to do that again.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Remember that

… single game prices are going to be higher than STH prices this year.

So it would be lowering those prices to STH levels in this dynamic system, if they use it.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh... that actually makes more sense.

I didn’t know that single tix prices were higher than STH. Therefore, they can offer tix price discounts mid-season… so long as they don’t discount below the STH price.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

ok, but still...

So if STH price for a particular game is $50 and the single game price for that same game is $55, something tells me that dynamic pricing could take that same game upwards to $75. So that’s a positive (for the Cubs) delta of $20.

Yet in this same scenario, the most dynamic pricing could take that downwards would be only to $50, the STH price. That’s a negative delta of $5.

IOW, if they are setting an artificially high baseline, then it really isn’t a dynamic pricing model.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

It's not a TRUE dynamic model, correct.

But it does give some price variance, and allows them to sell unsold inventory without screwing the STH.

Sounds fair to me.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

well, that's because you're a STH. ;-)

Seriously, a fair model needs to swing both ways. If you’re going to gouge the single game fans on the good days, you have to offer them bargains on the bad days. And the STH would be in the (relative) middle, taking the security of guaranteed supply at a pre-determined price.

Now if you’re going to say “life’s not fair” and “the Cubs aren’t in the charity business”, that’s fine too. I understand their need to design/execute a pricing model that works to their advantage so they can turn a profit. And you can call that many things – I’d probably call it “smart business” – but it wouldn’t be accurate to call it fair.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Nevertheless

… the Cubs really screwed bleacher STH by putting tickets on sale for half price last year for nearly half the schedule. It was a partial admission that they had priced them too high.

The Cubs told us they wouldn’t sell tickets below STH price. That’s their call. I’m not sure why you are suggesting they should price them lower.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm not. I'm suggesting that if they go dynamic, they should really go dynamic and let the market place dictate prices.

Otherwise, I think they should just set their prices however they want and give the STH a discount.

And I don’t know why you keep bringing up STH’s getting screwed over last year. That’s in the past. Shouldn’t we be looking forward? At least that’s what you keep saying whenever anyone brings up Quade.

So why not apply the same approach to ticket pricing discussions? I was discussing the options associated with a dynamic pricing model for this year (or whenever they might want to implement it) – what happened last year has no bearing on that.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't be disingenuous with me.

For the team, we move forward and not have to discuss Quade any more.

If they are going to continue to screw their best customers, then yes, I’m going to keep bringing it up.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Then don't move the goalposts with me.

We were discussing the merits (or not) of a dynamic pricing model. So any response by you that starts off with “Nevertheless…” is ignoring that topic and bringing in something completely different.

Furthermore, I did not specifically suggest the Cubs should price their tickets lower so you were putting words in my mouth. What I did point out is that by setting an artificially high baseline, then what they’re proposing is not really a dynamic pricing model.

By the way, have the Cubs taken any actions to suggest they are going to continue to screw their best customers? Given that STH bleacher prices have gone down and they’ve told you they won’t sell tickets below the STH price, those actions would seem to be the opposite of screwing their best customers. So there’s no need to keep bringing it up, is there?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 6:16 PM CST up reply actions  

By the way, have the Cubs taken any actions to suggest they are going to continue to screw their best customers?

Not yet.

But I’m watching them.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:53 PM CST up reply actions  

The per ticket ST discount is $1-2 dollars per ticket per game

according to the sheet the Cubs sent me.

There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary and there are 108 stitches in a baseball. Who says baseball isn't a religion? (Now #8452 in the Cubs Season Ticket Wait List...)

by Zeke on Dec 28, 2011 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

He's planning on listing the McDonalds across the street on the payroll

0- Service, Debt

Will also be listed on the payroll after this season.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 28, 2011 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I went from being a season ticket holder to not wanting to buy even one game when tickets go on sale.

How do you think the average fan feels?

Ricketts’ view on the ticket situation is typical reactive business thinking. If the current bottom line isn’t in imminent danger, just ignore it, and go on a safari.

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 28, 2011 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll be at a few.

I’m just not buying any from the box office.

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 29, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

so you'll go see the Cubs

via breaking the law?

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 29, 2011 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, that isn't right.

There are perfectly legal ways (Stubhub, for one) to buy tickets from sources other than the box office.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 30, 2011 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I liked his response on the budget,

“Would be in the same ballpark”. Had to read that twice….what other ball park would it be in?

Nice job Al, enjoyed all three parts.

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 is going into the Hall of Fame!!

by mrcubsfan on Dec 28, 2011 8:26 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Good job, Al.

You weren’t tossing softballs. But Rickettsia did a good job dancing around some of the tough questions.

by Clark Addison on Dec 28, 2011 8:35 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe he's been working with someone on that

Because we’ve seen, he could use coaching from a PR perspective at times.

Step Two: Develop an organizational plan

by Shanghai Badger on Dec 28, 2011 8:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Rickettsia

auto-correct lulz

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 28, 2011 8:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Did you know you can set up autocorrections?

So if there’s a word you typically type and it always gets corrected, it won’t now. It’s part of iOS 5.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 28, 2011 8:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh great...

…Quade was brought up and the BCB can of worms has been opened.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 28, 2011 8:39 AM CST reply actions  

Nicely done Al.

I appreciate that you weren’t pulling punches, but didn’t also try for a hatchet job. I like that he’s let you have a couple of interviews and am hopeful he believes you provided a fair representation of his statements so that he’ll give you another shot next offseason.

Thank you for this.

may addition by subtraction be real

by N Oakley on Dec 28, 2011 9:03 AM CST reply actions  

Hopefully...

… even during the season.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Any chance you'll get some time with Theo, Al?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 9:28 AM CST reply actions  

I'm hoping to.

Nothing’s been arranged yet, but I am working on it.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Good.

You did a nice job with this interview (particularly part 3). But I got a little annoyed with Ricketts punting to Theo as often as he did.

Obviously, that’s not your fault — you can only interview who you interview.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

If you do get one with theo

I would happily help you out with anything at all you need help with. I would happily fetch coffee’s etc.

Ok you probably don’t need that but a girl can dream can’t she?

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Heh.

Probably not. But thanks for the offer.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

On a more serious note

Do we see him @ ST?

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I assume he'll be in Mesa during spring training, yes.

For how long, I do not know.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Hopefully the last week he will

I WOULD LOVE to get a chance to see him,

3 months from now we will be there!!111111

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

i hope half his answers are not

well, thats up to Tom / Jed

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.

by Cubbie-Tim on Dec 28, 2011 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Man this guy rubs me the wrong way.

The priest and the asking-for-$200,000,000 things really bug me, but I want to like him, I really do, because clearly he got the right people in place this off-season. One thing’s for sure, he’s not a very fun interview.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 9:36 AM CST reply actions  

Tom Ricketts was not responsible for the priest incident.

That was Crane. And it happened before the Ricketts bought the team.

So you can’t blame him for that.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

A little revisionist history by dtpollitt

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Obviously I wasn't trying to do that.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Ahh, my bad.

The $200M thing is pretty stupid in and of itself, however.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Al I got to say you tried asking him some tough questions in this part. Better job than the Chicago media.

He sidestepped most of them as usual, but you did try.

His answer about Quade being the right guy scared me.

His answer about the rainouts was BS.

I loved your question about the different styles between Quade and Theo. It was worded well by you so it was harder for him to do his usual spin.

Nice work Al.

by TJ11 on Dec 28, 2011 10:09 AM CST reply actions  

His answer about Quade ...

was meaningless. Being honest in that situation would have been pointless.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

As I noted before

… there wasn’t much point in revisiting that.

I think TJ meant my question about style between Theo & Hendry, not Theo & Quade.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

TJ was referring to two things:
His answer about Quade being the right guy scared me.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Right.

Well, as I mentioned, there wasn’t too much point in revisiting the “Quade Era” in Chicago. It’s over and we’re moving forward.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks.

I thought it was a reasonable answer, too. I’m still in the “don’t bring Z back” camp, but we’ll see what happens.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I totally agree with you.

In fact, Ricketts’ answer shows he did, too.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I think there's value in it to understand his thought process.

But there’s no point in asking, because Tom would inevitably sidestep it.

DUMP GARZA

by shoemile on Dec 28, 2011 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Note that he did say
Mike was the right guy for the job when we made the decision.

Which implies they figured out that he wasn’t the right guy going forward.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Quade was the right guy because he was low risk with the decision still out

but going against Hendry. I think the whole transition was obvious.

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Dec 28, 2011 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Look...

What do you want him to say?

Damn, wrong manager.

Carry on.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Dec 28, 2011 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

It could actually imply a lot more.

Ricketts probably figured Quade was either some sort of weird genius (based on the results at the end of 2010) or a career minor-league guy who got lucky and who could easily be discarded after the season should 2011 be as bad as most of 2010 was.

It could also imply that Quade was a better choice than Sandberg at the time of the decision because Sandberg and Hendry didn’t get along (why hire a manager who won’t work well with a GM?) and because Ricketts wanted a manager he could dump after a year along with Hendry so the new management could bring in their own guy.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:24 AM CST up reply actions  

They didn't know that Quade would 'probably suck'.

The 24-13 finish fooled a lot of people.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Quade DID have 25+ guys...

…helping him suck, ya know? Granted, a lot of his moves were, shall we say, questionable, but, ya gotta look at what he had to play with. I’d split it this way…25% Hendry sucking…25% Quade sucking…50% the team absolutely sucking. However…if you think last year was bad………..

Happy Holidays to all BCBers...be safe.

by Easy Ed on Dec 28, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

no!

Hendry and Quade were MAKING them strike out!

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Ricketts let the 'basball guys'

make the decisions.

Hendry chose Quade.

This doesn’t get any simpler.

TR’s answer’s to that hiring makes perfect sense.

I’m glad TR lets the guys he hires run the ship. He let Hendry do his job. In retrospect, it was the wrong choice, obviously.

But it’s better that TR doesn’t meddle in baseball actions. Isn’t that what you want from a boss? Hire talented people (his new crew) and let them do their job. He respected Hendry’s long years of experience, and let him do what he wanted.

TJ will only be happy if a lie detector is strapped to any Cubs owner/GM/manager/coach.

The constant complaining is pretty tired.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Dec 28, 2011 10:37 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

He passes the buck in almost every answer.

That would have been a good time for a “Hendry was the GM and he thought this is what is best for the Cubs”

by TJ11 on Dec 28, 2011 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

How is THAT not passing the buck?

TJ, just because you need to stop expecting public officials to make comments based on what would give you emotional catharsis.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Apples and oranges.

Saying something that is in the air is Theo’s decision isn’t the same thing as pinning the blame on a very bad decision on the former GM.

In other words, Ricketts dodged some questions, but he didn’t deflect a ton of blame.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Other than George Steinbrenner ...

this is how almost all sports owners operate, TJ. Ricketts isn’t going to say something and torch Quade or Hendry. There’s no real point in doing so — other than making you feel better.

So, for Ricketts, there’s no point.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't disagree with that.

But you’re lumping everything in to (apparently) strengthen your case.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:30 AM CST up reply actions  

TJ

Not sure what you do for a living. Maybe this isn’t relavent in your line of work

But if you took the head of most companies out there and asked them hard questions do you think they would give you straight answers?

I just happy to see that at least in one of the 3 I did learn stuff.

Kudos to Al for not just lobbing softball questions

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 10:41 AM CST up reply actions   2 recs

Right.

And, if you read the actual statement by Ricketts about Quade, there’s a lot of meaning that COULD be taken from it.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd

TR isn’t a politician. He doesn’t “have” to answer to anyone. The idea that TR owes the fans a straight answer is just plain stupid.

Don’t like it? Get a billion dollars and buy your own team. Then you can give the tough answers yourself.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 28, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Ummm

Wow. If we aren’t suppose to have opinion on these things… I think it would make this comment section really dull.

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 11:42 AM CST up reply actions  

He is making money off fans stupid......

Spinning interviews does not help.

I know you believe EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH THE CUBS IS ALWAYS CORRECT…..but wow how have you not drowned in the Kool Aid yet?

by TJ11 on Dec 28, 2011 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

.

"Pounding sand since 1982...."

by cubswynn on Dec 28, 2011 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Al is a much better reporter on Cubs Baseball than any of the Chicago media.

I know that the media have certain relationships that sometimes may deter them from throwing hardball questions at people. But, for the love of god, can our reporters actually ask some real damn questions for once? Lord knows our team gave them ample opportunity last year. Would’ve love to ask this one:

“Hey Mike Quade, this is SackMan from BCB. Today, with 1 run lead entering the bottom of the 9th, you decided to make a defensive replacement in the outfield. A pretty good idea on paper. Except, you put Reed Johnson in RF for Fukudome and kept Soriano in left field. Care to share your thoughts on that?”

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Dec 28, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

It cant be asked now I guess....

But the day of……..

That should have been asked to Quade, Hendry, and Ricketts…..

And if I am asked why Ricketts? Because the other two make those stupid decisions and he can answer for them.

by TJ11 on Dec 28, 2011 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

You put WAY too much blame on other people for one persons dumb mistakes.

That stupid substitution was 100% on Quade’s shoulders. It was not something Hendry or Ricketts had to approve. Just like stupid signings are most likely 100% on Hendry’s shoulders.

Ricketts has said dozens of times he doesn’t know the ins and outs of baseball like the GMs or Managers, so he doesn’t micromanage them. He trusted Hendry’s opinions until he saw that they clearly were not in the best interest of the team. That responsibility now lies on Theo and Jed, which is why he pushes answers off to them. Not because he doesn’t want to answer it, but because he literally isn’t involved in that line of the business anymore.

by bdlugz on Dec 28, 2011 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

This is the Chicago media

The Cubs play better baseball then the Chicago media does. How did NO ONE discover/report/tweet about JH being fired 6 weeks previous?

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I just think no one leaked it.

It was in no one’s interest to get the information out, and in their minds, could have been harmful in regards to the draft signings.

DUMP GARZA

by shoemile on Dec 28, 2011 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a very fair question to ask Quade, I agree.

I have no idea – it really is pathetic that those issues don’t ever get addressed or questioned though.

by bdlugz on Dec 28, 2011 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Quade

Maybe he was the right guy. Maybe Ricketts knew that there was a decent probability that this team needed to go in a different direction and he was ready for a seismic shift in the front office… that weather it was Epstein, Friedman, Hahn or someone else, there was a good chance that Hendry was in his final days as Cubs GM. Because of that, he needed a manager who could easily be swept aside with Hendry.

by dmlichte on Dec 28, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

ding ding ding

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Dec 28, 2011 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.

I’ll say it: I supported the hiring of Mike Quade. He was familiar with our roster and had a lengthy history in the organization and in baseball in general. Quade also seemed like a nice contrast to the two superstar managers who preceded him. He dealt well with the media, was more of a coach and seemed much more engaged in the job than Lou was toward the end.

Sadly, as it turned out, none of these bright sides seemed to make much difference over the course of an awful 162-game season. His vast experience didn’t seem to add up to an ability to consistently make good in-game strategic decisions. His ability to “handle” the media went south as he increasingly made bizarre and often inaccurate post-game remarks. And he appeared to be engaged in managing a completely different team than the one we were seeing on the field.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I did not support him getting the job because there were warning flags all over despite their decent finish.

And then it all played out….If me a fan can see it…Why couldnt the Cubs front office?

by TJ11 on Dec 28, 2011 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

What were the warning flags?

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 1:06 PM CST up reply actions  

heh, good one.

I think I just heard somebody’s head explode off in the distance…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 1:09 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

I should've known.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

it's not about seeing it

it’s about caring about it. A baseball front office is going to have many concerns that a fan won’t.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Already asked.

Al said he’s checking on it.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

'but one thing I can say is that I think we have a much bigger team now'

Jim Hendry must have been the Ted Lilly of GM’s – doing the job of 6-8 people at once!!

by doofus cubs guy on Dec 28, 2011 10:33 AM CST reply actions  

It's very true that

… the Cubs front office was the smallest in MLB for many years. Even in recent years it was only second from the bottom.

Hiring these extra people should have been done years ago.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 10:41 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd.

This was a huge problem and, now, a huge improvement that everyone should recognize and celebrate.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I get the impression

Hendry was a bit of a micromanager/control freak… just between the lines.

Also, I found his remark “Not that Jim didn’t use analysis when he felt it was appropriate” quite telling. I would want my GM to use analysis ALL the time so I suspect there are a lot of lines to read between on that one, too.

by Emelie on Dec 28, 2011 12:29 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

The analysis line reminded me of when Ari Kaplan was hired.

Everyone kept referring to it as “Tom’s first hire,” and I get that technically it was, but the wording kept making it sound like his statistical analysis was a separate entity of the organization, instead of falling under Hendry’s umbrella. Now, I’m sure they worked together, but it was strange how it was hailed as a Ricketts move instead of Hendry hiring another guy to work under him.

DUMP GARZA

by shoemile on Dec 28, 2011 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

That was a major issue in the Cubs organization.

Maybe not necessarily Hendry himself, but someone like Fleita, who was responsible for the same amount of things that 3-4 bodies would encompass in other organizations.

I think the first major moves Theo/Jed have made are correcting those glaring holes in the front office. These are widely unnoticed or unheralded, but unbelievably important.

by bdlugz on Dec 28, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree 100% with this

Even if they wanted to, with such a small staff how are you able to pull together these reports. There are only so many hours in the day.

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Monkeys and Dartboards!

All the best organizations are on the Monkeys and Dartboards bandwagon.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 28, 2011 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

What about the Ari. What do you accomplish if you are the ONLY one in sabermetrics

in the whole organiation

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 11:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Monkey Recruiting: Baseball's New New Market Inefficiency

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 28, 2011 1:29 PM CST up reply actions  

A rotation full of poop-armed hurlers!

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice job, Al

This is easily the best site on the web for Cubs info and discussion. Hopefully you will continue to get more info and access as we move forward.

by Hookers or Cake on Dec 28, 2011 10:38 AM CST reply actions  

Great interview Al.

Thanks again. I especially enjoyed part one where he described the process of hiring Theo. Interesting how they went about that.

♪ He held me very tight under stars so bright and whispered darlin' "Who do you love tonight?" I told him "baseball, baseball...." ♫

by katie casey on Dec 28, 2011 10:57 AM CST reply actions  

How many other SBNation websites get to speak to the team owner?

I think the A’s website spoke to Billy Beane, but that’s all I can think of.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:05 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

I liked TR's first answer
In the same ballpark. How the baseball budget is determined is you take all the dollars you bring in, pay all your expenses and you give everything else to the baseball guys.

I can see Theo now

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 28, 2011 11:10 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

I think that was a cop-out, weird answer.

I understand owners buy a team because it’s profitable, but I don’t understand the mindset behind “balancing” the budget". Wouldn’t a championship or playoff run more than reap the rewards of a jump in payroll? An immediate increase in sales all around, but also a larger fanbase and more profitable season following a championship?

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

It's not weird or cop-out at all.

He’s actually stating that he’s not pocketing ANY funds, unlike certain teams in Southern Florida. He’s saying that after they determine the total revenue from 2011, they figure out what expenses need to be paid and then whatever is left, 100% goes back into the team. That’s a pretty cool thing to see. He’s not looking to make money – he’s looking to build a winner.

Imagine what that baseball revenue stream can look like if we can sign a 3 billion dollar TV deal or start our own Cubs network? I’ve heard estimates that the YES network takes in almost 400 million annually… I think I’m drooling over here, sorry.

by bdlugz on Dec 28, 2011 11:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Well then, I read that wrong.

I’m going to stay away from the internet today, I’ve fucked up reading on BCB twice already.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

nah... go for the hat trick

then start drinking.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

You just dropped

like 150 spots in the BCB poster power rankings. I’ve never seen such a fall.

by tomas21 on Dec 28, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

It's the off-season.

I’ve been playing Battlefield 3 and proposing to my girlfriend and eating a lot of Chipolte. I’m like Carlos Zambrano, I don’t even pay attention during the off-season, instead I’m not eating bananas and chatting on ICQ.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

won't it be that you proposed to your fiance?

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Why would I propose to her if she was already my fiance?

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 12:07 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

I'm recouping you 50 BCB points just for this response.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

you've been playing battlefield and proposing to your gf

I am under the impression that it had already happened.

If that is the case, she would currently be your fiance not your gf.

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Hm, a sound counterpoint.

Dan, I’m only giving you 25.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I give him 5 points for finding someone who would

actually say yes to him.

evilly laughing

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

ಠ_ಠ

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah but I didn’t propose to my fiance, I proposed to my girlfriend, then she gained XP and morphed into my fiance, unlocking “Wedding Planning Guidebook”, “Bridezilla”, and decreasing my life expectancy by 11. I found some mana in a treasure chest so that helped.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

WELL?????? DON'T KEEP US IN SUSPENSE!!!!!!!!!!

I mean, c’mon. You can’t just drop a bombshell like that and not tell us what the outcome was.

So? What happened? Huh? Huh? Huh???? Did Blackburn make it back in time?

heh heh…

oh, btw, congrats

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I’d post a picture, but I know SWL will just Photoshop it, so yeah, I started with a 23-clue scavenger hunt that spanned all day and ended at the place we first met, with 20 of our family and friends there, totally worked. 2+ months planning. w00t!

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

"23" clues? Hmm... Did you give a resounding speech afterwards?

Are you planning a honeymoon to the Lehigh Valley area? Gonna name your firstborn IronPig?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 28, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

what? No Cubs quiz?

A la Diner and the Baltimore Colts.

Congratulations on your impending nuptials.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Dec 28, 2011 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Very cool

Congratulations.

"Keep pushin' til' it's understood. And these badlands start treating us good."

by AussieCub on Dec 28, 2011 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

...
I’m like Carlos Zambrano Silva, I don’t even pay attention during the off-season

Fixed that for ya.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

"He’s not looking to make money"

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 29, 2011 2:20 AM CST up reply actions  

TR: All the expenses that go with the overhead of running the team. And then after you’ve paid all of those, that goes to baseball and then it’ll be Theo’s job to decide how to allocate that within, in baseball. Whether it goes to on field payroll, whether it goes to amateur signings, international signings, expanded scouting. Whatever he decides.

BCB: Do you have any sense whether the major league payroll will be a little higher, a little lower, about the same as last year?

TR: You know, I don’t have a final number on that. It’ll be Theo’s call.

And that’s why asking him about Quade or Z or Soriano is useless. TR isn’t Mark Cuban; he lets his people do their jobs. Last year, he was letting Hendry do his job.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 11:32 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

which was a huge mistake

if you step back look @ the body of work, as a company.

Not as something you feel so close to that you feel a need to defend each and every action.

There were mistakes made. I won’t want a business of any sort to make some of the money decisions that Cubs made. Would you want the company you work for to spend $$$ that way? Or put people in charge that made lots of mistakes? Was that a good idea to let them just make things worse? No,

That being said, I don’t give a rats ass about Q or JH so I care less about what TR would say about them. But I want Theo/Jed to make all the decisions

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

I don’t think TR sees it as a mistake. He saw it as a bad investment, perhaps, but one he had to follow through on.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

He surely has opinions on these things.

He just has no interest in sharing them.

DUMP GARZA

by shoemile on Dec 28, 2011 1:42 PM CST up reply actions  

exactly.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Good Job Al...

I can see TR’s really focused on the long term improvements to make the Cubs a year in year out contender.
I have to disagree with some of the folks saying “if they don’t do X…” or “If they don’t sign Y…” they must be cutting the player budget and don’t wanna win…

The get a big FA signed and hoping for the best is the old way… Over spending on a couple older FA’s is the old way…

Look I get it… we all want a winner NOW… I’ve been a fan since Ernie hit #500… I’m 46… I’ve been there and done that on the “Cubs suck again this year” band wagon…
Baseball and ownership on The North Side of Chicago is changing… This isn’t a win today and screw the future mentality anymore… It’s also not a screw today and focus solely on tomorrow mentality either…

Relax… Enjoy the ride…

We have a new GM and management team with a proven record of building a winner, one that builds for long term success and year in and year out contention…

On another note… Al, have you thought about doing a pod cast when you do interviews?

THEEEEEOOOOOOO....

by Endrick on Dec 28, 2011 12:01 PM CST reply actions  

Podcast?

I could, I guess… never really thought about that.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 28, 2011 1:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I know some local folks...

That do a gaming podcast… not sure how hard it would be to do…

I would think a couple of good mics and a good laptop and you can have a portable recording studio…

THEEEEEOOOOOOO....

by Endrick on Dec 28, 2011 4:11 PM CST up reply actions  

The question of offices @ Wrigley

With all the square feet his house has…… he could make office there . Hell he could probably also be able to put a batting cage in there also. LOL

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 12:05 PM CST reply actions  

I meant Theo

The Stat Pack

by shoemile on Oct 21, 2011 10:10 PM CDT

by Madison Cub Fan on Dec 28, 2011 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

First, outstanding work by Alternative Media

Al, you should request press passes for various Cub events.

TR: All the expenses that go with the overhead of running the team. And then after you’ve paid all of those, that goes to baseball and then it’ll be Theo’s job to decide how to allocate that within, in baseball. Whether it goes to on field payroll, whether it goes to amateur signings, international signings, expanded scouting. Whatever he decides.

The whole situation is summed up here as to what to expect as to “field payroll” coupled with an earlier quote:


In terms of player development, we had some reports that we generate here about how many players of each team make it to the major leagues. We looked at what they call bona fide prospects in each system over time, like how many of the players in each system rank at what would be producing productive major league players. And we also looked at systems in terms of which system had on balance across the entire system the best rankings in terms of looking at each player, projecting them forward and then again ranking all the teams

They are going to put a product on the field that is competitive, plays the game towards a Cubs way that will be developed down through the system, but in context of a 10 year plan, but watch how money is allocated.

TR: I think that as a team we’ve probably under-invested for a while now. I think there was a little too much emphasis on getting the last piece on the major league club and that cost us in the dollars that were available for our amateur signings.

FORGET DREAMS of FIELDER

The next move will be Garza, followed by Marmol, Soto and then the dumping of Soriano and Dempster before the amatuer drafts.

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Dec 28, 2011 12:05 PM CST reply actions  

It's possible that TheoJed are considering trading all those guys ...

but they won’t just give them away (other than Soriano). That means that finding a match on all of those guys will be incredibly difficult, meaning some of them will be back.

My guess? Soto and Garza are dealt in the offseason and Dempster, Zambrano and Marmol are shopped mid-summer.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 28, 2011 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Photoshop idea:

Take the movie poster for “Field of Dreams” and change it to “Dreams of Fielder.”

Go.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

The next move will be Garza, followed by Marmol, Soto and then the dumping of Soriano and Dempster before the amatuer drafts.

Not getting Fielder (and I agree, we won’t sign him) doesn’t mean that you pull down the walls. I could see Marmol going. If some team offers us the pot at the end of the rainbow, I can see a Garza deal. The rest of it? Unlikely.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

a little bit of both

They all have value to the team (reports of Soriano’s demise are somewhat exaggerated) but probably not enough to move his salary. I think the team needs to sell high on Soto and Demp, so there has to be a good offer for those guys.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Even I recognize that his value is low, although you continue to ignore his positive contributions from last year, simply because he’s overpaid. It’s unlikely that he’ll be moved.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 28, 2011 4:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Christmas present from father-in-law.

Homemade W and L flags!

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 28, 2011 1:16 PM CST reply actions  

I still don't see the reason for flying an "L" flag.

Just fly the “W” or nothing. We have media now. It’s not 1932.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Dec 28, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Then why bother flying the "W" flag either?

It’s a tradition that should be continued, win or lose.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 29, 2011 8:11 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed.

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on Dec 29, 2011 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with SDSJM

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

It's a tradition unique only to Wrigley.

I don’t see the validity in eliminating it simply because we have cell phones. Should we also eliminate printed box scores in newspapers or managers using phones to call bullpens? I know this is a strawman argument, but there’s literally no argument to eliminate it besides “it’s old and we have technology”, which isn’t an argument.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think it's a strawman argument you're giving...

I just don’t see the reason for it either. You fly the “W” or you don’t….that’s a worse argument I guess. I’m not trashing your gift either. I just feel bad enough over a loss and to see the “L” flying all day makes me sad every time I look at it.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

If there’s no flag (signifying a L), how would you differentiate between a loss and a no-game day?

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 2:24 PM CST up reply actions  

ha, got me there....

I suppose I’d look on my cell phone :)

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

...

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice.

And is that a Persian rug I see?

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

About 75 games.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Al

enjoyed these thoroughly

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 28, 2011 1:32 PM CST reply actions  

If I was a gambling man (and I am)...

…I’d bet that Carlos Zambrano WILL be on the 25 man roster of the Chicago Cubs in 2012 (sigh).
Speaking of gambling…my best friend from high school works in Vegas and sent me the “betting line” of next year’s baseball season. I about fell over when I seen that there are no fewer than 14 teams with longer odds to win the World Series than the Cubs…who, as it stands right now, are 35:1 to do it. They are also 20:1 to win the NL pennant. For the first time in 15 years of doing so, I will NOT be wagering on the Cubs. But, c’mon…the Cubs have a better shot at winning the WS than 14 teams?

Happy Holidays to all BCBers...be safe.

by Easy Ed on Dec 28, 2011 2:35 PM CST reply actions  

As of right now....

…I’m expecting Big Z to be in the Cubs 2012 rotation as well. Starting pitching depth is just too valuable — even for a team that’s not expected to contend. All Z offers on the current trade market is marginal salary relief, which doesn’t really help a big market team like the Cubs rebuild. Like Dempster, Z will maybe/probably be worth more at the July trade deadline.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 28, 2011 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Will Blakey

be untouchable again?

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Dec 28, 2011 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

If they add one more Wild card team for 2012...

…that would play right into Hoyer’s (notice how I said Hoyer, since HE is the GM) hands. There will be MORE teams in contention, IMO…which means more teams trying to get that one last piece to get them “in”.
. The Cubs will be so far out of it, they can deal who they want and probably have suitors for most of them. The buyers will be more plentiful by the deadline, I’d think.

Happy Holidays to all BCBers...be safe.

by Easy Ed on Dec 28, 2011 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Buying & paying for a Cubs Championship

Many heartfelt thanks Al for your thorough interview and spot-on questions with TR!

As I read through the many comments and concerns for ticket prices and policies, I am struck by the ironic nature of people’s upset regarding “paying more” for an “inferior product” on the field.

I empathize with everyone’s concern about increased ticket prices given another or several non-competitive seasons of Cubs baseball. However, I frame this upset with the irony that most of us on BCB also state emphatically and passionately that the Cubs winning it all is one of our most important events in life!

I recall living through the mid 1950s teams with Ernie and almost no other high calibre players. Then followed the hope & promise of the pre ’69 Cubs with Ronnie, Fergie, and Billy. Even then my passion was the same & only increased by the many collapses and near misses.

I can no longer afford to attend as many Cubs games as I did during the earlier eras. Yet, I would do so now, if at all possible, to support this current rebuilding for a Cubs Championship organization! My contention has never faltered that excellent management is what the Cubs lacked during my lifetime. It was fun and exciting to witness firsthand the rise of the ’69 , ’84, and ’03 Cubs teams during times that their management was atypically more effective than usual.

One of my dreams and goals in life has been to be there at Wrigley when the Cubs are in the WS & win it! I was called to buy season tickets in 2008 after waiting for an eternity. I had to decline with great pain and remorse due to finances. Owning season tickets was the only way I knew to guarantee the opportunity to witness Cubs history, but I had to watch that dream die as I said “no” to the long-awaited offer from the Cubs.

The fans always pay no matter what the quality of the product on the field. We do have choices to stay away, decline on season tickets, or just stop being a fan.

I am reminded of the children’s story about The Little Red Hen. The Mother Hen asks, ’Who will help me plant the seed, make the bread, and finally eat the bread…

Someday…

by GeneticCubsFan on Dec 28, 2011 3:02 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Great work on all three parts all

And a big thank you to Tom Ricketts to agreeing to the interviews.

"Keep pushin' til' it's understood. And these badlands start treating us good."

by AussieCub on Dec 28, 2011 9:22 PM CST reply actions  

WAI, HLOO THAR CHCAGO!

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Dec 29, 2011 12:51 AM CST reply actions  

Um...is that you?

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Nope

I have several similar shots of Atlanta, but never one where I was able to get a reflection of myself in the pic.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Dec 29, 2011 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Definitely a cool shot.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm hearing

Garza might be gone in next 24 hours. that really bothers me. isn’t he the type of person you build around? we can’t have a rotation of nobodys and expect to win anything. its like trading castro for someone younger at his position… geez next year is a wash but at this rate 2015 is looking bleak.

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 2:43 AM CST via Android app reply actions  

We can't have a rotation of Garza and a bunch of nobodies and expect to win.

We saw that last year. Trading Garza (for the right package) would be an attempt to use one talent to get multiple ones.

DUMP GARZA

by shoemile on Dec 29, 2011 6:52 AM CST up reply actions  

look at it like this

Garza + another FA SP is better than (insert name here) SP + that FA SP. We NEED a cornerstone in the rotation going forward. We are a patchwork rotation. In the past 5-10 years(or even furthur)we also have been lacking an anchor pitcher. Z was supposed to be that but he’s too inconsistent. Think of all the top tier teams, they have anchors. gallardo,carpenter,halladay,CC the list goes on. my point. I am an offensive minded guy but I’d rather take mediocre offense(and play small ball if needed) and have a solid 1-4 rotation(phillies,giants,cardinals to name a few) than have a loaded offense but poor pitching. I’m beating a dead horse but pitching wins championships. in the last 10 years the only team I cant remember with a solid rotation was the 03 marlins (who did have dontrelle who pitched out of his mind- in hindsight )

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 12:33 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

I believe Garza and Z will be in a Cubs uniform in the spring...putting Garza out there is the Cubs way of saying any trade is possible.

…and personally, I’m comfortable with that given our lack-luster line-up.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 12:39 PM CST up reply actions  

....also, I think most people will buy tickets to see Z "perform"/pitch than anyone else in the rotation, just saying,

I know that’s not how most people here think, but to an average fan, he has an “entertainment” value. You have to look at it that way too.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd explore it but nothing further.

the reason is- my definition of an anchor is a proven starter who will lock down games allowing barely any runs and go deep into games. hard to tell that with a prospect. strasburg seemed like an anchor but he’s been injured so who knows if he will ever become an anchor for the nationals. while the price difference may be worth it, its a given anchors of rotations command big bucks because they are good at what they do. its expected they are going to be good so it should be budgeted already. halladay? worth anything within reason as far as $$. Zambrano? not worth as much because inconsistent.

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 4:02 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

But the FA class next year has a lot of those pitchers, and some will certainly be available.

If you can get a #2 and even #4 starter for 6 years plus another prospect you do it. You then sign someone like Hamels or Cain and use him as your “Garza” pitcher.

by bdlugz on Dec 29, 2011 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

good point

but what about keeping Garza who is young and lock him up and still get Cain or hamels. we have money to blow, and we don’t need to get rid of everyone for talent, which we could still be a decent contender in next few years. if we lose Garza(we get prospects obviously) but that puts us with z, demps and then the clownshoes rest of rotation great for down the road but we are even worse in present state.

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 5:10 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

but the question is...would they suck less?

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 5:17 PM CST up reply actions  

right, but the less they suck the more tickets they'll sell...even if it's just by a small amount.

I think there is a considerable portion of fans that buy tickets for the “show”. In other words, there has to be a lot of tickets that sell for “entertainment” value alone. I think the FO maybe takes that into consideration, no?

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

casual fans don't care about garza's FIP

if the team is bad, casual fans won’t show

Just wee-un.

by jesus christos on Dec 29, 2011 6:08 PM CST up reply actions  

....I have to add, you know what's important in building a strong organization,

and I know what it’ll take from what I read here, but a lot of people I know couldn’t name you one player in the minors. Hell they couldn’t name half the players on the roster last year. But they buy a lot of tickets, or used to. Again, that’s why I read this site…I used to be like them and only knew what was on the field each summer. My love for and interest in baseball/Cubs brought me to BCB.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 5:55 PM CST up reply actions  

while this is

true… coolio is on my train of thought. if we lose Garza we lose a solid 2 and gain prospects to help us in like 2 years but we lose mlb depth. while we won’t win a world series we will lose even more in a division that is wide open. conceding in a major market is dangerous.

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 5:56 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

I guess

where I fall is with al. you have to build along with being contenders. a few pieces here a few there each year. not all eggs in one basket.
the Yankees buy everything and hardly win, and the pirates always rebuild and aren’t even close. good balance is how you win championships.

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 6:02 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

Thank you.

This is exactly how I feel.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 29, 2011 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

has the point been made

about how we will have a ton of interleague games which means prince would DH some of the year and play first the rest. the less he plays d the less chance for errors. I think we need to lock him up. he fits with everything we are doing. I just don’t see why he’s taking so long

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 6:04 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

10 years is what is taking so long.

I’ve been a proponent for Fielder for quite some time but I’m not sure I’d go for 10 years.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 6:39 PM CST up reply actions  

And this is 100% an option if we don't get a package that blows us away for Garza.

Which is why anyone in the camp to trade Garza is only willing to do so for a substantial package.

The guys I’m talking about getting are not low level prospects, it’s a top 20-30 prospect, a top 50-70 prospect, and a high upside younger prospect as well.

by bdlugz on Dec 29, 2011 7:28 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah

I hear ya. I just say don’t give up on Garza. at least wait until trade deadline or deal him next season. or lock him up. who knows. this is the beautiful tragedy of a close to the vest new ownership.

I just don’t understand why we have to acquire ONLY new talent. I’m ok with fielder cespedes or soler. we need something because DeJesus and Stewart will not cut it

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 7:50 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

There's a major difference between Fielder and Soler...

I assume we will be all in on Soler, and I really hope he ends up in our system regardless of what happens elsewhere.

by bdlugz on Dec 29, 2011 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I would like to know the chances of acquiring of a prospect that will actually reach Matt Garza's level or better

Kyle Drabek seemed like a can’t miss prospect and now everybody is down on him. I am starting to feel like we should just lock a proven talent like Garza for 5 years since we are a big market team and not the Rays.

I’d rather trade guys near the end of their peak, or positions we have filled, or relievers with 1 year left. Of course Garza is none of them.

A Big Market team trading a player like Garza seems unconventional, but Theo probably has a plan if it happens.

by Mitchener on Dec 29, 2011 8:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Trading Garza puts our payroll to about 90 mil

Soto, Marmol, Z and Dempster all going away leaves us with only DeJesus and Soriano on the payroll post 2012.

We could be witnessing a Frank McCourt 2.0 situation right before our eyes.

Not sure what the end game is to actually….you know…….be competitive is? What we can 100% surmise though. That the days of 120-150 million dollar payrolls are over. I’m thinking Ricketts will try to live in the 70-80 range as long as possible.

No way to spin that as good news for Cubbie baseball.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 8:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I initially thought the same thing

However it might be a combination of Theo being sick of Luchino and the challenge of being able to have full autonomy that might have prompted his move.

I hope I am ultimately wrong about the payroll. However I don’t see any obvious moves that are out there that lead us back to the 120-150 range where we have been the last 5 years.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 9:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Cole Hamels?

Matt Cain? An extension for Castro? A (possible) extension for Garza? Joey Votto?

Theo would not have left his hometown job to be the president of McCourt 2.0. And, even if he was sick of Lucchino, why would Hoyer agree to come with him?

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 9:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 29, 2011 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

That's just ridiculous.

While the current strategy could lead to a rough 2012, there’s no indication that the payroll will fall significantly in the long term or that this situation is at all analogous to the Dodgers.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 9:50 AM CST up reply actions  

The analogous situation with the Dodgers is

Ricketts bought a team without having the money to actually “buy” the team. Like McCourt he used (borrowed from Dad) 15% of the purchase.

He financed the rest.

Do we think there was any possible way that Ricketts buys this team without his Dad co-signing the note?

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 10:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Where do you get that?

Even if the Cubs salary is low in 2012

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry posted too quickly....

Even if the Cubs salary is low in 2012, how does that imply that it will be low for the future. What it does say is that the days of signing aging FA’s trying to chase a pennant are over and that is a good thing.

I’m sure there will be more free agents after this year that the Cubs could sign.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 10:03 AM CST up reply actions  

It might be a bit of paranoia on my part I admit

However Ricketts did kind of drop a hint of this at the end of Last season.

When asked what he thought about payroll going forward. He said he imagined that we would stay in the top 4 of the NL.

The 4th highest payroll that season was 97 Million dollars.

Then we saw that he deferred 50% of a 1 year contract to the only free agent of note that we signed last year.

Just a lot of smoke that points to Ricketts wanting to live in the 90ish payroll area. And bottoming out in 2012 is the easiest way for him to reset those fan expectations.

We shall see how this plays out?

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 10:10 AM CST up reply actions  

The Pena thing is completely irrelevant.

The Cubs payroll was more then $140 million last year.

This is more than a bit of paranoia. You need to take off the tinfoil hat, at this point.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

my 2 cents,

I think it’s a matter of getting his payroll under control…not going cheap because he doesn’t have the money, but trying to actually get what you’re paying for. We’ve had a World Series type payroll and non-contending teams for the past few years. Any business guy would want to turn that ship around no matter how much money is available or not available.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Again, I hope I am wrong

I just have concerns in reading the tea leaves here. Hopefully Ricketts proves me wrong and goes back to spending 140-150 annually after spending well south of 100 this year.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

You are reading what you want in the leaves.

There is no indication the Cubs are going to permanently decrease salary as you say. Do you really think Epstein and crew would have signed on for that? Look at the spending the Cubs are doing everywhere else from front office, draft picks, IFA, Latin American facilities, etc. The Cubs will spend on the major league team when appropriate.

Hendry was always chasing the missing pieces and everyone hated it. Now that Theo isn’t, some people are panicking.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Could be some truth to that

I’d just feel better if Ricketts said something along the lines of “We didn’t find anything compelling on the market. So we are going to pocket the 40 million we saved on payroll for another year”.

As it stands it just looks like we’ve halved our payroll in a matter of 15 months. That in and of itself is really bothersome.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

The thing it, it isn't Ricketts call at this point.

He is giving Theo 100% control of what he does with the money Ricketts gives him. You literally cannot compare this in any way, shape or form to the Dodgers.

by bdlugz on Dec 29, 2011 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

actually, I think that's pretty cool...
As it stands it just looks like we’ve halved our payroll in a matter of 15 months.

also, I don’t think he should or needs to make excuses for how the FO is going about their business.

"Well-behaved women seldom make History"---Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

by cooliogirl47 on Dec 29, 2011 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

You're being incredibly thickheaded.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

There's no way he'd ever be that specific.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

How do you know?

Halving it implies $75 million. Dempster, Z and Soriano are $50 million already. Add Marmol, Soto, DeJesus and Byrd you are already pushing $75 million. They still need 18 players after that. True that maybe one or two might be traded but others will be signed/acquired. I’m not convinced that LaHair will be the only 1st base option.

Why do you insist the payroll will be $70 – $80 million for the foreseeable future?

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 5:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I count 67 million minus Garza before DeJesus and Arbitration and Auto Renewals

The Payroll when Ricketts took over in 2010 was 144,359,000.

If Garza and Byrd go without bringing money back. We will be sitting at less than 50% of what we were when Ricketts took over.

I’m fine with that if we can pocket that for a future 200 Million dollar payroll. I’m upset as a fan if this is a “new way of doing business”.

No reason on earth that the Chicago Cubs should be having a payroll lower than the Cincy Reds. We might be looking at a payroll in the Oakland A’s 2011 territory.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 6:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Except you also aren't counting

DeJesus, Stewart, Wood if he resigns, Baker, Johnson, a possible 1st baseman, Maholm if he signs.

Feel free to think Ricketts bought the Cubs to turn them into the A’s.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 6:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Feel free to ignore what I say and be a blind apologist

I think it is something that should at least be mentioned on a Cubs forum. Maybe its nothing, maybe it is something.

Nobody here knows for sure what the end game is. Other than we are obviously punting the 2012 season.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 7:01 PM CST up reply actions  

An apologist?

You must have me confused with someone else.

I see what you have said. You are counting 7 players and saying that is the Cubs salary. You started saying the Cubs salary would be around $100 million which might be possible if Epstein is a great trader but then you went to between $70-80 million and now you are below $70 million and comparing them to the A’s.

Did you not see what Hendry did for the last 10 years? He kept chasing FA’s and spending money on B grade free agents. The Cubs organization is a complete disaster. They can’t contend next year. Let Epstein clear off what he can and rebuild.

Fielder is the only FA I had any interest in and until he comes down below 10 years, I’m not interested. I don’t want the Cubs to waste money on crummy FA’s and pretend to contend. Did you really want to see something like a Carlos Beltran signing? That would have been a Hendry special. 3 years for $45 million.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 7:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I think its fallacy to say that spending money is a poor idea just because Hendry was an abject failure

The reason that Epstein is in the position he is was that Boston’s owners allowed him to spend freely.

I am all for having a better ML system. I just don’t think we should be willing to punt 5 years of MLB success to accomplish this goal.

I think its extremely curious and noteworthy that we have halved the payroll in 15 months of Ricketts. You might not agree? All I am saying that I have concerns.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Except barring significant trades

they haven’t halved the payroll in half. I don’t see how you are thinking they are playing with a $75 million salary next year. Assuming Z, Soriano and Dempster return which I think is a good guess, there is $50 million already. DeJesus and Stewart who will be here push that to $57 million.

I haven’t even added Marmol, Soto, Byrd and Garza who may get moved. I haven’t added anyone else to the rotation to replace Garza nor a 1st baseman.

Even if they play 2012 at a low payroll that doesn’t mean anything about 2013, 2014 or beyond. I don’t want a Carlos Beltran type deal just to add salary. Likewise I don’t want the overrated CJ Wilson. Where do you want all this money spent?

All signs point to Ricketts willing to spend money yet you are focused on one thing, the 2012 salary.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 7:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough

My worry is that once the expectation to spend 140-150 million is gone. That the days of spending on that level will be gone as well.

The money wasn’t the reason we are in this situation.

It was that Jim Hendry was a terrible GM, bad judge of talent and an even worse negotiator.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 7:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Hey agreement there!

And I would add that spending a lot of money immediately to fix the problem isn’t the solution. The Cubs organization is much worse than many realize. It can’t be fixed with just added salary. You mentioned Theo and Boston, they also had solid minor leaguers to go along with the FA’s. The Cubs have none on the way. Cubs fans get excited by players like DJL and Flaherty. They are reserve players not championship players. To realistically compete in 2012 and 2013, the Cubs need to buy too much.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 7:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed that our ML system is atrocious

I’d just rather we attempt to compete at the MLB level as opposed to punt seasons away.

Just my humble opinion.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I also have issue

With the fact that we are punting 2012 and quite possibly 2013 and 2014 as well.

I can’t believe there isn’t more backlash over this?

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions  

i'd rather have a team that can contend for a WS every year

rather than one that constantly gets knocked out in the first round

Just wee-un.

by jesus christos on Dec 29, 2011 7:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Is there a choice?

Adding Pujols and Wilson would not make this team a serious contender.

I’d love to compete in 2012 but it isn’t realistic. I wouldn’twrite-offf 2014 though.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 7:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Most of the 40 man roster gets a split salary

400K while on the 25 man or Cubs Major League DL. And a split salary for time spent in the minors (usually about 60K).

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 7:02 PM CST up reply actions  

If it makes you feel better, then TR can pay me $40M next year to be the last guy in the bullpen.

I’m left-handed, can throw a mean knuckleball and for $40M, I will gladly carry a little pink backpack every game.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 29, 2011 3:13 PM CST up reply actions  

That the days of 120-150 million dollar payrolls are over. I’m thinking Ricketts will try to live in the 70-80 range as long as possible.

The interview doesn’t support that presumption.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 29, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

And the Cubs are not looking like 70-80 million this year either

unless Theo is a master trader and can find homes for a lot of players. Dempster, Z and Soriano are $50 million by themselves.

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

It was actually less than 130

Pena got 2 million to sign, 3 million last season and 5 million to be paid over this season.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0Ah4PW47PiAi-dDVmNFRzVENYSTF2OXJwVUUyNVJIaFE&output=html

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 10:40 AM CST reply actions  

This chart hasn't been updated since March.

No one after Marcos Mateo is due to get any money, and it doesn’t count Rodrigo Lopez or the cast of thousands that seemingly filled the No. 5 spot in our rotation. It also doesn’t factor in performance bonuses.

I think it’s safe to assume the Cubs were over $130 million last year, which should ease your concerns about “McCourt 2.0”. I saw Bruce Levine mention $140 million for the 2011 payroll earlier this week. Maybe the Pena pillow contract inflated that, but you’re still freaking out over nothing.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Why would they have the need to split up and defer such a small deal?

Why not just pay it like you would any other standard deal? That didn’t seem odd to anyone else?

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Dec 29, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

'Odd'? Sure.

A sign that we’re in for McCourt 2.0? Hell no.

Where have you gone, Kiko Calero. A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

by elgato on Dec 29, 2011 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Part of it pushed back to the 2010 payroll

The bonus deferred until December allowed the Cubs to not have to pay it during the season, which is apparently something that was needed.

I have no idea, but arguing over how they spent 5 million of $140 million is hardly troublesome. Worst case, it shows we’re only comfortable at this time with a $135 million payroll, which is still more than enough to be perennial contenders.

by bdlugz on Dec 29, 2011 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Not unless I put on my tinfoil hat.

Who knows why that was done? I don’t see how that implies the Cubs are now looking to decrease salary to the $70-$80 million mark as you said above..

John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?

by rlpete on Dec 29, 2011 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

TEAMS HAVE INTEREST IN RYAN THERIOT

Linky to MLBTR because there’s multiple sources.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 1:39 PM CST reply actions  

Good, it's about time you give up, you wanker.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

not till March.

Forget all that other stuff. I gotta believe.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 29, 2011 3:10 PM CST up reply actions  

You'll be back

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Dec 29, 2011 2:07 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

But...

…you’re…Jesus.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 2:24 PM CST up reply actions  

So the idea of Theriot getting another ring is more powerful than Armageddon itself?

Be afraid people, be very afraid…

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 29, 2011 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I believe the deal Theriot and Fontenot struck with Satan...

…was for one (1) World Series ring in exchange for their eternal souls. But I’ll have to check the contract.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

wouldn't surprise

the guy cheated me out of a shiny pokemon card

Just wee-un.

by jesus christos on Dec 29, 2011 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

In lieu of this,

I need to reevaluate my life choices.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Dec 29, 2011 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

The Mets would be perfect.

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Do the Mets even have a starting shortstop right now?

Is it possible they could go from Jose Reyes to Ryan Theriot? Oh, the joy of the misery of others!

"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach

by daver on Dec 29, 2011 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Subraction by addition...

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 29, 2011 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Jed hoyers

kid was born today. on Theo day. it’s destiny

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 29, 2011 8:39 PM CST via Android app reply actions  

I note that...

… Hoyer’s kid was named “Beckett”.

What, not “Starlin”?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Dec 30, 2011 7:58 AM CST up reply actions  

either

he likes the trading card books or he is still hanging on to his Boston ties with a hard on for josh Beckett. wagers anyone?

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 30, 2011 11:30 AM CST via Android app up reply actions  

likely

but ill stick with my gut. makes it more interesting

Mike Brown is the true definition of a businessman:
1.Build bare essentials to run business(PB Stadium)-✔
2.Hire cheap players-✔
3.When you suck don't give in to anyone's demands-✔
4. Change is a bad thing-✔

by RIP Slim on Dec 30, 2011 12:49 PM CST via Android app up reply actions  

Best of the three

I love how he’s given complete control of baseball operations, but I don’t like how he dodges hypothetical questions.

"I'm sore and I'm pissed off. I'm a baller. I want to feel the leather. I love thumb wars. 6-8 weeks? 6. follow me for healing, Jay Cutler does" - Jaysthumb twitter acct

by propheteer on Jan 1, 2012 5:13 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  997 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima